Zum Inhalt springen
The ConsciousLibrary

Christentum · Christliche Mystik · Katholizismus · Neuplatonismus

Meister Eckhart

um 1260 – 1328Historisch belegte Person

Thüringischer Dominikaner (um 1260–1328), zweimal Magister der Theologie in Paris, Provinzial der Saxonia und Prediger in Straßburg und Köln. Auf Latein schrieb er ein unvollendetes scholastisches Werk — das Opus tripartitum, Bibelkommentare, Predigten —, auf Deutsch predigte er über den Seelengrund, die Abgeschiedenheit und die Gottesgeburt in der Seele und prägte dabei den abstrakten Wortschatz der deutschen Sprache. Vom Kölner Erzbischof angeklagt, starb er, bevor die Bulle In agro dominico (1329) achtundzwanzig aus seinen Werken gezogene Sätze verurteilte.

Werke
37Werke
Ausgaben
112Ausgaben
Zitate
9Zitate
Videos
12Videos
Bilder
6Bilder
Fraile dominico identificado tradicionalmente con Eckhart (Andrea di Bonaiuto, Via Veritatis)

Fraile dominico identificado tradicionalmente con Eckhart (Andrea di Bonaiuto, Via Veritatis) · CC BY-SA 4.0

In eigenen Worten

«Here God's ground is my ground and my ground is God's ground.»

Sermón alemán 5b, «In hoc apparuit caritas dei» (DW I)

Der zentrale Gedanke

The ground (grunt): 'Grunt' is the word Eckhart uses for what is innermost in the soul and, at the same time, innermost in God, and his boldest thesis is that the two grounds coincide: 'here God's ground is my ground and my ground God's ground' (Sermon 5b).

Biografie

5 Min. Lesezeit

Unterstützte Übersetzung aus dem spanischen Original, Durchsicht durch einen muttersprachlichen Übersetzer ausstehend.

Ein Ordensbruder aus Thüringen

Eckhart wurde um 1260 in Thüringen geboren, in Tambach oder in Hochheim bei Gotha; über seine Familie und seine Kindheit weiß man nichts Sicheres. Jung trat er in das Erfurter Dominikanerkloster ein und wurde an den Studienhäusern des Ordens ausgebildet, wahrscheinlich in Köln, wo das Erbe Alberts des Großen noch nachwirkte, und danach in Paris. Sein bekanntes Leben ist das eines Gelehrten des Predigerordens: Studium, Leitungsämter und Predigt, in dieser Reihenfolge und oft zugleich.

1293–1294 las er in Paris über die Sentenzen des Petrus Lombardus; aus diesen Monaten sind eine Antrittsvorlesung und eine Osterpredigt erhalten. Nach Thüringen zurückgekehrt, war er Prior in Erfurt und Vikar der Region. Dort hielt er den Novizen Ansprachen, die als Reden der Unterweisung (Die rede der underscheidunge) abgeschrieben wurden: Man solle sich nicht so sehr darum sorgen, was man tue, als darum, was man sei; nicht die Werke heiligen den Menschen, sondern der Mensch heiligt die Werke.

Magister in Paris

1302 erhielt er in Paris den theologischen Lehrstuhl, der den ausländischen Dominikanern vorbehalten war, und mit ihm den Titel magister, der ihm fortan anhaften sollte: „Meister“. In den Quaestiones dieses Studienjahres vertrat er gegen die übliche Lesart des Thomas von Aquin die These, dass in Gott das Erkennen grundlegender sei als das Sein, und stritt mit dem Franziskaner Gonsalvus Hispanus darüber, ob dem Intellekt oder dem Willen der Vorrang gebühre.

Von 1303 bis 1311 war er der erste Provinzial der neuen Dominikanerprovinz Saxonia, die von den Niederlanden bis nach Livland reichte, und 1307 Generalvikar für Böhmen. 1311 sandte ihn der Orden ein zweites Mal nach Paris, eine Ehre, die vor ihm nur Thomas von Aquin zuteilgeworden war. Aus diesen Jahren stammt der Plan eines Opus tripartitum — ein Werk der Thesen, eines der Fragen und eines der Auslegungen —, von dem nur Prologe, Kommentare zu Genesis, Exodus, Weisheit und Johannesevangelium sowie lateinische Predigten ausgeführt wurden. Sein Generalprolog spricht die These aus, die alles ordnet: „Das Sein ist Gott.“

Der Prediger von Straßburg und Köln

Um 1313 ließ er sich als Vikar des Ordensmeisters in Straßburg nieder, mit dem Auftrag, die zahlreichen Dominikanerinnenklöster und die Beginengemeinschaften am Oberrhein zu betreuen. Für sie predigte er auf Deutsch. Seine Predigten, von Zuhörern mitgeschrieben und in Hunderten von Handschriften kopiert, sind der Kern seines Ruhmes: Die kritische Ausgabe erkennt heute mehr als hundert an, nummeriert von Josef Quint und Georg Steer, dazu sechsundfünfzig lateinische Predigten.

Keine deutsche Predigt ist von seiner Hand erhalten. Wir kennen sie aus Nachschriften von Hörern, oft Nonnen, die ohne Namen oder vermischt mit Texten anderer Prediger umliefen; Sammlungen wie das Paradisus anime intelligentis vereinen Stücke von ihm mit denen anderer Dominikaner. Um Echtes von Unechtem zu scheiden, ging Josef Quint von den Stellen aus, die im Kölner Prozess und in Eckharts eigener Verteidigung zitiert werden und seine Urheberschaft verbürgen, und zog von ihnen ausgehend die Parallelen in Lehre und Stil heran. Deshalb ist Quints Zählung zur Art geworden, Eckhart zu zitieren, und deshalb ist manches, was man ihm im 19. Jahrhundert zuschrieb, wie der Traktat Schwester Katrei, aus seinem Werk ausgeschieden.

In ihnen kehren wenige Gedanken mit unerhörter sprachlicher Kühnheit wieder: Die Seele hat einen „Grund“ oder ein ungeschaffenes „Fünklein“, in dem der Vater unablässig seinen Sohn gebiert; damit diese Geburt geschieht, muss man alles Bild, alles Wollen und sogar Gott, wie wir ihn uns vorstellen, „lassen“ und sich von ihm „abscheiden“; jenseits von Gott ist die „Gottheit“, eine stille Wüste, in der es keine Unterscheidung gibt. Indem er das sagte, schuf Eckhart einen guten Teil des abstrakten Wortschatzes der deutschen Sprache.

Für die verwitwete Königin Agnes von Ungarn schrieb er das Buch der göttlichen Tröstung, begleitet von der Predigt Vom edlen Menschen, die lehrt, in Gott den Trost für jeden Verlust zu finden. Der Traktat Von abegescheidenheit, der die Abgeschiedenheit über die Liebe und die Demut stellt, wird ihm seit alters zugeschrieben, doch seine Echtheit ist umstritten.

Der Prozess

Um 1323 versetzte ihn der Orden an das Generalstudium in Köln. 1326 eröffnete Erzbischof Heinrich von Virneburg, beunruhigt über die Bewegungen des Freien Geistes und im Streit mit den Dominikanern, ein Inquisitionsverfahren gegen ihn, gestützt auf Listen von Sätzen aus seinen Büchern und Predigten. Eckhart antwortete mit einer peniblen Verteidigung, in der er zwischen Irren und Ketzersein unterscheidet: Irren könne er, schreibt er, aber nicht Ketzer sein, denn das eine gehöre dem Verstand an, das andere dem Willen.

Im Januar 1327 appellierte er an den Papst; am 13. Februar ließ er in der Kölner Dominikanerkirche eine notariell beurkundete öffentliche Erklärung seiner Rechtgläubigkeit verlesen und reiste nach Avignon. Dort reduzierte eine päpstliche Kommission die Anklagen auf achtundzwanzig Artikel. Eckhart starb vor dem 30. April 1328, dem Tag, an dem Johannes XXII. dem Erzbischof schrieb, das Verfahren nehme seinen Fortgang; weder Tag noch genauer Ort seines Todes sind bekannt.

Am 27. März 1329 erklärte die Bulle In agro dominico siebzehn der Artikel für häretisch und die übrigen elf für „übel klingend“ und verdächtig; sie fügte hinzu, Eckhart habe am Ende seines Lebens alles widerrufen, was in den Gläubigen einen häretischen Sinn erzeugen könne. Die Bulle wurde nur in der Kirchenprovinz Köln veröffentlicht und verurteilte nicht seine Person.

Ein unterirdisches Nachleben

Seine Schüler Johannes Tauler und Heinrich Seuse führten seine Lehre mit Vorsicht fort, und viele Predigten liefen anonym oder unter fremden Namen um. Nikolaus von Kues ließ seine lateinischen Werke abschreiben und verteidigte ihn 1449, verlangte aber, man solle sie nicht in die Hände des einfachen Volkes geben. Auf diesen Wegen und durch die Übersetzungen Taulers erreichte die rheinische Mystik die europäische Spiritualität des 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts.

Im 19. Jahrhundert entdeckten ihn Franz von Baader und Hegel wieder; Franz Pfeiffer gab 1857 die deutschen Texte heraus, und Heinrich Denifle entdeckte 1886 die lateinischen Werke, die dazu zwangen, ihn als scholastischen Theologen zu lesen. Der Nationalsozialismus wollte ihn als germanischen Mystiker vereinnahmen; die 1936 begonnene kritische Ausgabe und die spätere Forschung haben ihm seinen Platz in der dominikanischen und neuplatonischen Tradition zurückgegeben.

Seit Rudolf Otto ihn 1926 mit Shankara verglich, ist Eckhart zu einem bevorzugten Gesprächspartner im Dialog mit dem Vedanta und dem Zen-Buddhismus geworden, von Suzuki bis zur Kyoto-Schule. Diese Rezeption war fruchtbar, doch Historiker wie Kurt Flasch warnen vor einem aus seinem Kontext gelösten Eckhart: Er war ein scholastischer Magister, der von Christus und der Schrift mit den Mitteln der Philosophie seiner Zeit sprach.

Quellen: Meister Eckhart. Die deutschen und lateinischen Werke. Herausgegeben im Auftrage der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1936– (Die deutschen Werke, ed. Josef Quint y Georg Steer; Die lateinischen Werke, ed. Konrad Weiß, Josef Koch, Loris Sturlese et al.). · McGinn, Bernard. The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing. Nueva York: Crossroad, 2001. · Ruh, Kurt. Meister Eckhart: Theologe, Prediger, Mystiker. Múnich: C. H. Beck, 1985 (2.ª ed. 1989). · Flasch, Kurt. Meister Eckhart: Philosoph des Christentums. Múnich: C. H. Beck, 2010. Trad. ingl.: Meister Eckhart: Philosopher of Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015. · Meister Eckhart. The Essential Sermons, Commentaries, Treatises, and Defense. Trad. e introd. de Edmund Colledge y Bernard McGinn. Nueva York: Paulist Press, 1981 (Classics of Western Spirituality; ISBN 0809123703).

Zeitleiste

Das Leben, Jahr für Jahr

Jeder Punkt ist ein belegtes Ereignis. Klicken Sie, um es mit Quelle und Grad der Gewissheit zu lesen.

  1. um 1260 · 0 Jahre

    Birth

    He is born in Thuringia, near Gotha. Neither the exact date nor his family is known.

    Wahrscheinlich

  2. um 1275 · 15 Jahre

    Joins the Dominicans

    He enters the Dominican convent of Erfurt; the date is an estimate.

    Wahrscheinlich

  3. um 1293 · 33 Jahre

    Lecturer on the Sentences

    He lectures on the Sentences in Paris (1293–1294); the inaugural Collatio and the Easter Sermon of 1294 survive.

    Belegt

  4. um 1294 · 34 Jahre

    Prior of Erfurt

    Prior of Erfurt and vicar of Thuringia (until c. 1298); he delivers the Talks of Instruction.

    Belegt

  5. 1302 · 42 Jahre

    Master of theology

    He holds the Dominican chair for foreigners (1302–1303); Parisian Questions.

    Belegt

  6. 1303 · 43 Jahre

    Provincial of Saxony

    First provincial of the new Dominican province of Saxony (1303–1311).

    Belegt

  7. 1307 · 47 Jahre

    Vicar general of Bohemia

    The general chapter entrusts him with reforming the convents of Bohemia.

    Belegt

  8. 1311 · 51 Jahre

    Second regency in Paris

    He teaches in Paris again (1311–1313), a privilege previously held only by Thomas Aquinas.

    Belegt

  9. um 1313 · 53 Jahre

    Vicar in Strasbourg

    Vicar of the master general with care of the Dominican nuns and beguines of the Upper Rhine; the period of the great German sermons.

    Wahrscheinlich

  10. um 1323 · 63 Jahre

    Studium generale in Cologne

    He teaches and preaches in Cologne.

    Wahrscheinlich

  11. 1326 · 66 Jahre

    The trial begins

    Archbishop Henry of Virneburg opens an inquisitorial process; Eckhart writes his defence.

    Belegt

  12. 24. Januar 1327 · 67 Jahre

    Appeal to the pope

    Eckhart appeals to the Holy See against the archbishop's commissioners.

    Belegt

  13. 13. Februar 1327 · 67 Jahre

    Public declaration

    He has a protestation of orthodoxy read, recorded in a notarial instrument (now in the Vatican Archives), and leaves for Avignon.

    Belegt

  14. 1328 · 68 Jahre

    Death

    He dies before 30 April 1328, when John XXII writes to the archbishop referring to him as deceased.

    Belegt

  15. 27. März 1329

    Bull In agro dominico

    John XXII condemns twenty-eight articles: seventeen heretical and eleven evil-sounding or suspect.

    Belegt

  16. 1449

    Defence by Nicholas of Cusa

    In the Apologia doctae ignorantiae Cusanus defends Eckhart; his library preserves the main codex of the Latin works.

    Belegt

  17. 1857

    Pfeiffer's edition

    Franz Pfeiffer publishes the German texts attributed to Eckhart, the basis of his rediscovery.

    Belegt

  18. 1886

    Discovery of the Latin works

    Heinrich Denifle publishes the Latin works found in Erfurt and in Cusanus's library.

    Belegt

  19. 1936

    The critical edition begins

    The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft begins Die deutschen und lateinischen Werke (Kohlhammer).

    Belegt

Werke

Grundlegende Werke

Die Werke, ohne die sich das Vermächtnis nicht verstehen lässt.

Talks of Instruction (Counsels on Discernment) — Meister Eckhart

Schriftliches Werk · um 1296

Talks of Instruction (Counsels on Discernment)

Die rede der underscheidunge

Twenty-three chapters of practical spiritual direction on true obedience, prayer, detachment from one's own will, the Eucharist, sins and how to work without losing God. They contain the maxim that what one does matters less than what one is. It is Eckhart's earliest German work.

5 Ausgaben · amazon.com

The Book of Divine Consolation — Meister Eckhart

Schriftliches Werk · um 1318

The Book of Divine Consolation

Daz buoch der götlîchen træstunge (Liber Benedictus I)

A treatise of consolation in three parts: truths about the relation between the just man and justice, some thirty grounds of comfort in loss, and examples of sages and saints. It teaches that whoever suffers with God and for God finds that God suffers with him, and that accepted suffering becomes sweet.

6 Ausgaben · amazon.de

On Detachment — Meister Eckhart

Schriftliches Werk · um 1320

On Detachment

Von abegescheidenheit

A short treatise that places detachment above love, humility and mercy, because it compels God to come into the soul: a detached heart is a blank tablet on which God writes. Its image of the door swinging on its motionless hinge is among the most quoted in German mysticism.

6 Ausgaben · amazon.com

German Sermons (complete corpus) — Meister Eckhart

Spätere Zusammenstellung · um 1320

German Sermons (complete corpus)

Predigten (deutsche Predigten)

More than a hundred sermons preached mainly to nuns and beguines, commenting on the Gospel or Epistle of the day. In them the theses for which Eckhart is known are formulated: the birth of the Son in the ground of the soul, the uncreated spark, poverty of spirit, the Godhead beyond God. Their language, at once popular and abstract, is a landmark of German prose.

10 Ausgaben · amazon.de

German Sermon 5b: 'In hoc apparuit caritas dei in nobis' — Meister Eckhart

Schriftliches Werk

German Sermon 5b: 'In hoc apparuit caritas dei in nobis'

Predigt 5b: «In hoc apparuit caritas dei in nobis»

A sermon on the incarnation and the ground: God became man so that man might be born as son, and 'here God's ground is my ground and my ground God's ground'. It asks for a life 'without why', lived from one's own ground. A manuscript fragment discovered in 2010 is one of its oldest witnesses.

4 Ausgaben · amazon.de

German Sermon 52: 'Beati pauperes spiritu' — Meister Eckhart

Schriftliches Werk

German Sermon 52: 'Beati pauperes spiritu'

Predigt 52: «Beati pauperes spiritu»

The sermon on poverty: poor is the one who wills nothing, knows nothing and has nothing, not even a place in which God could work. It contains the prayer that God rid us of 'God' and the evocation of the state in which man was before he was created. It is his most commented sermon.

5 Ausgaben · amazon.de

Zitate

Zitate, die in einem bestimmten Werk nachgewiesen sind. Jedes trägt seine Herkunft und seinen Grad an Verlässlichkeit.

Here God's ground is my ground and my ground is God's ground.

Hie ist gotes grunt mîn grunt und mîn grunt gotes grunt.

GeprüftSermón alemán 5b, «In hoc apparuit caritas dei» (DW I)

1 / 9
Apokryphe Zitate oder Zitate umstrittener Zuschreibung (2)
  • «If the only prayer you ever say in your entire life is thank you, it will be enough.»

    A widely circulated English quotation not found in the German or Latin works of the critical edition. It appears to be a modern paraphrase; its first appearance has not been located.

  • «What we plant in the soil of contemplation, we shall reap in the harvest of action.»

    Attributed to Eckhart in modern compilations without reference to any sermon or treatise. The idea recalls Sermon 86 on Martha and Mary, but the sentence is not in it.

Letzte Worte

Es gibt keine überprüfbaren Aufzeichnungen der letzten Worte.

No account of his death survives. It is known only that he died before 30 April 1328, probably in Avignon or on the road, while the process was still open. The bull In agro dominico (1329) states that at the end of his life he revoked and deplored the articles he had admitted teaching 'insofar as they could generate a heretical sense in the minds of the faithful', but that is a legal formula, not last words.

Quelle: Juan XXII. Bula «In agro dominico», Aviñón, 27 de marzo de 1329. Texto en Denzinger–Hünermann, Enchiridion symbolorum, n.os 950–980; trad. ingl. en Colledge y McGinn (1981), 77–81.

Fragen

Was das Werk beantwortet

Zwölf große Fragen der Menschheit und was sich aus den Texten darauf antworten lässt, mit Belegen. Wir legen niemandem Worte in den Mund.

  • Was ist das Absolute? Gibt es Gott?

    Beyond the God of three Persons lies the modeless Godhead

    Persönlich und unpersönlich zugleichAusdrücklich gesagt

    Eckhart affirms the Trinitarian faith without reservation and, in his Latin works, identifies God with being itself («being is God», prologue to the Tripartite Work) and, in the Parisian Questions, with understanding. But in the German sermons he distinguishes between God, who is spoken in Persons, acts and is named by creatures, and the Godhead (gotheit), a desert ground without mode in which there is no distinction. Hence in sermon 52 he prays that God rid us of «God», that is, of the image of God as an object, and in sermon 83 he proposes loving him as a non-God, a non-spirit, a non-person. Both levels are true: the personal God is the Godhead as manifested; the Godhead is that same God in his ground, which no name reaches.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Wer bin ich? Gibt es ein wahres Selbst?

    In the ground of the soul, God's ground and mine are one

    Das Selbst ist das AbsoluteAusdrücklich gesagt

    Eckhart distinguishes in the soul its powers, which deal with images and creatures, and a ground (grunt), a spark or «little castle» so simple that not even God as Persons can peer into it (sermon 2). In that ground, he says in sermon 5b, God's ground is my ground and my ground is God's; there the Father begets his Son, and the eye in which I see God is the same eye in which God sees me (sermon 12). Sermon 52 even evokes the state in which man was in God before being created. The true self is not the one who owns, knows and wills, but the one who, detached, coincides with the divine ground.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Warum leiden wir?

    All sorrow springs from love of what is lost

    Begehren und AnhaftenAusdrücklich gesagt

    In the Book of Divine Consolation, written for a grieving queen, Eckhart diagnoses suffering with precision: all sorrow comes from love of what loss takes from us. Whoever grieves over outward goods shows that their heart was set on them and not on God. The remedy is detachment: the soul that wills nothing of its own, that has left its will in God's, cannot be wounded in what is essential, because nothing it loses was its own. Eckhart adds a theological consolation: whoever suffers for God and in God does not suffer alone, because God suffers with him, and so pain loses its bitterness.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Was geschieht nach dem Tod?

    The just live in eternity, which is a timeless now

    Ewiges Leben und AuferstehungAusdrücklich gesagt

    Eckhart shares the faith in eternal life, but shifts the emphasis from afterwards to now. In sermon 6, on the verse «the just shall live for ever», he explains that the just man, as just, is begotten by justice and lives in it as the Son in the Father; this life does not begin after death, because eternity is a now that knows no before or after. The sermons on the eternal birth place in that same now the birth of the Son in the ground of the soul. The death that matters is the death of attachment and of self-will; whoever has died to himself already shares, in the ground, in the life that does not end.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Wie erlangt man Befreiung oder Erlösung?

    Whoever seeks God by a way keeps the way and loses God

    Ohne Methode: totale AufmerksamkeitAusdrücklich gesagt

    Eckhart distrusts paths that turn into ends. In sermon 5b he warns that whoever seeks God by a way takes the way and leaves God hidden in it; whoever seeks him without a way takes him as he is in himself. What is decisive is not what one does, but what one is: the Talks of Instruction ask us to think less about works and more about being. The path, if it can be called that, is detachment: a heart empty of images, of self-will and of desire for reward, in which God begets his Son. The noble man, poor in spirit, lives and acts «without why», like life that lives because it lives.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Braucht es einen Lehrer?

    God speaks his Word in the ground of the silent soul

    Der Lehrer ist innenAus der Lehre abgeleitet

    Eckhart was himself a master —the title came from his chair in Paris— and a preacher to communities of friars and nuns. But his doctrine places the true teacher within: in the sermons on the eternal birth, the Father speaks his Word in the ground of the soul, and to hear it the faculties and images must be silenced. No outward teaching can give what is received only in that silence. In sermon 12, the eye with which the soul sees God is the same with which God sees it: ultimate knowledge does not come from outside. The preacher can only point and awaken.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Ist die Welt wirklich?

    Creatures are a pure nothing; all their being is God in them

    Offenbarung des GöttlichenAusdrücklich gesagt

    Eckhart holds two theses that only appear contradictory. On the one hand, if being is God, creatures have no being of their own: in a German sermon he goes so far as to say that all creatures are a pure nothing, not small or something, but nothing. On the other, all they have they receive from God at every instant, so that every creature is full of God and is a book about him: whoever knew a single creature thoroughly would need no sermons. In the Commentary on Genesis he interprets «in the beginning» as the Word: God creates in the eternal now in which he begets the Son. The world is real as manifestation, never as something that stands by itself.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Was ist Liebe?

    To love without why, from a ground that seeks nothing

    Was erscheint, wenn das Ich aufhörtAusdrücklich gesagt

    Eckhart distrusts love that seeks something, even God or his consolation: whoever loves God for the reward treats him like a cow, wanted for its milk and cheese. True love is «without why», like life that lives because it lives. In the treatise On Detachment he goes so far as to place detachment above love, because love urges me to love God, whereas detachment compels God to love me. And in sermon 12 he explains that whoever truly loves himself loves all people as himself, without preference. Love appears when the possessive self yields: it is God loving himself in the bare ground of the soul.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Sind wir frei, oder ist alles vorherbestimmt?

    The will is free, and its summit is to let itself go into God's

    Echter freier WilleAus der Lehre abgeleitet

    Eckhart presupposes the scholastic doctrine of free will: in his Defence he distinguishes error, which belongs to the intellect, from heresy, which belongs to the will, and therefore asserts that he can err but cannot be a heretic. But his interest lies not in the freedom to choose, but in what the will does with it. The Talks of Instruction teach gelâzenheit, letting go: renouncing one's own will so that God's will may be one's own. Whoever achieves this wills all that God wills and acts without why. The highest freedom, for Eckhart, is not choosing among options, but willing nothing of one's own.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Wozu meditieren oder beten?

    The most powerful prayer comes from an empty mind

    Meditation ist keine TechnikAusdrücklich gesagt

    Eckhart proposes no meditation techniques. In the Talks of Instruction, asked which prayer is most powerful, he answers that it is the one that comes from an empty mind, detached from all things and from itself. Asking God for this or that is, in a sense, treating him as a means; pure prayer asks for nothing. In sermon 52, the poor in spirit do not even wish to fulfil God's will, nor keep within themselves a place where God might act. And in the sermons on the eternal birth, the Word is spoken when all the faculties fall silent. Meditation is not a method to be carried out, but a silence without a centre of its own.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Kann die Vernunft das Letzte erkennen?

    Expound faith and Scripture with the natural reasons of philosophers

    Glaube und Vernunft helfen einanderAusdrücklich gesagt

    Eckhart, master of theology in Paris, states at the beginning of his Commentary on the Gospel of John his purpose: to expound what the Christian faith and the Scripture of both Testaments affirm by means of the natural reasons of the philosophers. For him, Scripture, theology and philosophy say the same thing in different ways, and Moses, Christ and Aristotle teach one truth. In the Parisian Questions he even asserts that in God understanding is more fundamental than being. But this intellectualism ends in silence: the intellect, carried to its ground, breaks through all images and concepts, and God remains beyond every name. Reason is a path, not a destination.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Sich von der Welt zurückziehen oder sie verwandeln?

    Martha, mature, acts from the ground without losing God

    Kontemplation im HandelnAusdrücklich gesagt

    Eckhart reverses a traditional reading of the Gospel. In sermon 86, on Martha and Mary, he holds that Martha, who serves, is more mature than Mary, who listens seated at Jesus's feet: Mary is still learning, whereas Martha has come to act from the ground without activity separating her from God. The Talks of Instruction insist on the same point: whoever truly has God has him everywhere, in the street and among people as much as in church or in the cell, and need not flee things but learn to pass through them. Holiness depends not on place or work, but on the being from which one acts.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen

Anekdoten und Erzählungen

Anekdoten und Erzählungen

Belegt1302–1303

The master and the Franciscan

In the 1302–1303 academic year two mendicant masters coincided at the University of Paris: Eckhart, in the Dominican chair for foreigners, and the Franciscan Gonsalvus of Spain, soon to be minister general of his order. Between them was disputed a question that divided the two schools: whether the praise of God in heaven, an act of the intellect, is nobler than the love of God in this life, an act of the will. Gonsalvus defended the primacy of the will and love; Eckhart that of the intellect, which receives God naked, as he is, whereas the will takes him under the veil of the good. The dispute survives in the Parisian Questions and in Gonsalvus's reply. Behind the scholastics there was more than a rivalry of orders: Eckhart's conviction that the ground of the soul is pure intellect, the idea he would later carry into his German sermons.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Quaestiones Parisienses (LW V) and Quaestio magistri Consalvi; analysis in McGinn (2001) and Flasch (2010).

Quelle: McGinn, Bernard. The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing. Nueva York: Crossroad, 2001.

Belegt1326

'I can err, but I cannot be a heretic'

In 1326 the commissioners of the archbishop of Cologne, Henry of Virneburg, presented Eckhart with two lists of propositions drawn from his Book of Divine Consolation, his Latin commentaries and his German sermons. The old master, who had been provincial and twice regent in Paris, replied with a long written defence. He protested, first of all, that an exempt Dominican was being judged before an episcopal tribunal; he pointed out that several articles had been miscopied or torn from their context; he explained the true sense of the others with Augustine, Thomas and Scripture; and he set out a distinction that defines his attitude: he could be mistaken, because error belongs to the intellect, but not a heretic, because heresy belongs to an obstinate will. He added that he was ready to correct anything he had said if shown something better. The defence is today the main touchstone for knowing what he really wrote.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Rechtfertigungsschrift, in the Acta Echardiana (LW V); partial English translation in Colledge and McGinn (1981).

Quelle: Acta Echardiana: documentos del proceso de Colonia y Aviñón (listas de artículos, defensa, apelación, protesta pública de 13 de febrero de 1327, votum de Aviñón, carta de Juan XXII de 30 de abril de 1328). Ed. Loris Sturlese, en Die lateinischen Werke, vol. V. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2000–2006.

Belegt13 de febrero de 1327

The protestation in the Dominican church

On 13 February 1327, after appealing to the pope against the archbishop's judges, Eckhart went up to the pulpit of the Dominican church in Cologne and had a solemn declaration read in Latin and translated into German before the people: he had always detested, as far as he could, every error in faith and morals; if anything he had written or preached could be understood in an erroneous sense, he publicly revoked it. He clarified, however, two points wrongly attributed to him, such as that the little finger of his hand had created everything. A notary, Wolter of Kettwig, drew up a record of the act, and the document is kept today in the Vatican Apostolic Archive. A few days later the commissioners rejected the appeal, and Eckhart set out for Avignon, from which he would not return.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Notarial instrument of 13 February 1327 (Vatican Apostolic Archive, Archivum Arcis, Arm. C, 1123), edited in the Acta Echardiana.

Quelle: Acta Echardiana: documentos del proceso de Colonia y Aviñón (listas de artículos, defensa, apelación, protesta pública de 13 de febrero de 1327, votum de Aviñón, carta de Juan XXII de 30 de abril de 1328). Ed. Loris Sturlese, en Die lateinischen Werke, vol. V. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2000–2006.

Belegt1328–1329

A condemnation without a condemned man

When the commission of theologians at Avignon finished its opinion, Eckhart was already dead. On 30 April 1328 John XXII wrote to the archbishop of Cologne assuring him that the process against the deceased was going ahead. Almost a year later, on 27 March 1329, the bull In agro dominico, which opens with the image of the enemy sowing weeds in the Lord's field, describes 'a certain Eckhart from Germany' who 'wished to know more than was fitting', lists twenty-eight propositions and condemns them. But the same bull adds that the master, at the end of his life, had revoked everything that could be understood in a heretical sense, and it was not addressed to the whole Church but to the archbishop and his province. The result was paradoxical: a text that marked him for centuries and, at the same time, the acknowledgement that he was never personally declared a heretic.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Letter of John XXII of 30 April 1328 (Acta Echardiana); bull In agro dominico (DH 950–980).

Quelle: Juan XXII. Bula «In agro dominico», Aviñón, 27 de marzo de 1329. Texto en Denzinger–Hünermann, Enchiridion symbolorum, n.os 950–980; trad. ingl. en Colledge y McGinn (1981), 77–81.

Belegt1449

The books Cusanus did not want in common hands

A century after the trial, the theologian John Wenck accused Nicholas of Cusa of following Eckhart's condemned doctrines. Cusanus replied in 1449 with the Apologia doctae ignorantiae, written in the voice of a disciple: he had seen many Latin works by the master in libraries, admired his ingenuity and learning, but advised removing them from public places because the people were not prepared to understand what is said in them differently from other doctors. It was a defence and a warning at once. Cusanus had those Latin works copied for himself, and the codex kept in the library of his hospital at Bernkastel-Kues, with his marginal notes, is one of the main witnesses of the Opus tripartitum. Without the cardinal's prudent curiosity, much of the Latin Eckhart would have been lost.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Nicholas of Cusa, Apologia doctae ignorantiae (1449); Codex Cusanus 21 (Bernkastel-Kues, library of the St Nicholas Hospital).

Quelle: Nicolás de Cusa. Apologia doctae ignorantiae (1449). Ed. Raymond Klibansky, Nicolai de Cusa Opera omnia, vol. II. Leipzig: Meiner, 1932.

Mündliche Überlieferungrelato del siglo XIV

Meister Eckhart's daughter

A girl knocks at the door of a Dominican convent and asks to see Meister Eckhart. The porter asks whom he should announce. She replies that she does not know. How can she not know? Because she is neither maiden, nor wife, nor widow, nor lady, nor servant, nor any of the things by which she might be named. The bewildered porter fetches the master, who comes out and questions her, and tells his brothers that he has heard the purest person he has ever known. The story, a few lines long, was copied in German manuscripts from the fourteenth century with the title 'Meister Eckhart's Daughter' and, in a sixteenth-century Augsburg codex, as 'Meister Eckhart's Feast'. There is no indication that it happened: it is an edifying exemplum that stages his doctrine of detachment from every identity, and it shows how far his name lived on as that of a master of wisdom.

Herkunft der Erzählung: An anonymous legend edited by Pfeiffer (1857) among the attributed texts; the Augsburg version, Universitätsbibliothek, Cod. III.2.8.9, fol. 104v, titles it 'Meister Eckharts Wirtschaft'.

Quelle: Pfeiffer, Franz (ed.). Deutsche Mystiker des vierzehnten Jahrhunderts, vol. II: Meister Eckhart. Leipzig: G. J. Göschen, 1857; reimpr. anastática Gotinga: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1906.

Lehren

Lehren

Die Begriffe, die das Denken gliedern, in ihrem Zusammenhang erklärt.

The ground (grunt)grunt
'Grunt' is the word Eckhart uses for what is innermost in the soul and, at the same time, innermost in God, and his boldest thesis is that the two grounds coincide: 'here God's ground is my ground and my ground God's ground' (Sermon 5b). The ground is not a faculty (neither memory, intellect nor will) but that from which they spring, and it has neither name nor mode. Eckhart also describes it as a 'spark', a 'light', a 'little castle' or a 'fortress' into which not even God as Trinity can peer, and in some texts he calls it 'uncreated and uncreatable', a formula among those condemned in 1329. What is at stake is not a divinisation of the self but the opposite: in the ground no self remains to appropriate anything. McGinn has proposed that the ground is the key word of all Eckhart's mysticism, because it unites his Latin metaphysics of being and intellect with his preaching on the life 'without why'.

Christian Neoplatonism (Augustine, Dionysius, Proclus through the Liber de causis) and scholastic debate on the powers of the soul.

Quelle: McGinn, Bernard. The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing. Nueva York: Crossroad, 2001.

The birth of God in the soulnacimiento-de-dios-en-el-alma
The most constant doctrine of the German sermons is that the Father begets his Son in the ground of the soul with the same act with which he begets him in eternity. Eckhart goes so far as to say that it would avail little that Mary gave birth to the Son of God if that birth did not also take place in every soul. The birth is neither a psychological event nor a reward, but the truth of what man is when he stops interposing images, desires and purposes: then the soul does nothing and God does everything. Eckhart insists that this birth takes place 'in the essence of the soul', not in its powers, and that it requires silence. The doctrine has roots in Origen and Augustine, but in Eckhart it becomes the centre: the incarnation happened so that man might become by grace what Christ is by nature. From this comes the condemned proposition that the good man is the only-begotten Son of God.

Greek and Latin patristics (Origen, Augustine) and the Christmas liturgy; Christology of adoptive grace.

Quelle: McGinn, Bernard. The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing. Nueva York: Crossroad, 2001.

Detachment (abegescheidenheit) and releasement (gelâzenheit)desasimiento
'Abegescheidenheit', being separated or detached, and 'gelâzenheit', having let go, are Eckhart's names for the condition of the soul that allows the birth of God. It is not asceticism or flight from the world: the Talks of Instruction ask us to leave ourselves, because whoever has left himself has left everything, and Sermon 86 praises Martha, who works without losing God. Detachment is the renunciation of all appropriation (of things, experiences, virtues, even of God as an object) and the state of being available. The treatise On Detachment places it above love, because love compels me to suffer for God whereas detachment compels God to come to me; and it compares it to the motionless hinge of a door that opens and closes. The word 'Gelassenheit' passed to Tauler, Suso, Luther, Böhme and, in the twentieth century, to Heidegger, who gave that title to a lecture in 1955.

Dominican and beguine spirituality of the Upper Rhine; the monastic tradition of renouncing one's own will.

Quelle: McGinn, Bernard. The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing. Nueva York: Crossroad, 2001.

God and the Godheaddeidad
Eckhart distinguishes between 'God' (got), the God who manifests himself as Trinity and as creator in relation to creatures, and the 'Godhead' (gotheit), the modeless, nameless and workless ground from which everything proceeds. 'God and the Godhead are as different as heaven and earth', says one sermon. As long as there are creatures, there is a 'God' who is their God; in the Godhead there is no distinction at all, it is the 'silent desert' to which the spark of the soul longs to return. Hence the prayer of Sermon 52 (that God rid us of 'God') and that of Sermon 83 to love God as a 'non-God'. It is neither atheism nor rejection of the Trinity, which Eckhart upholds, but negative theology taken to the extreme, heir to Dionysius the Areopagite: everything we say of God is more false than true, and only silence is equal to the divine ground.

Dionysian apophatic theology and the Neoplatonism of the One.

Quelle: McGinn, Bernard. The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing. Nueva York: Crossroad, 2001.

Poverty of spiritpobreza-de-espiritu
In Sermon 52, on 'Blessed are the poor in spirit', Eckhart rejects poverty understood as penance or as renouncing one's own will to do God's, because whoever still wants to do God's will still wants something. He proposes a threefold poverty: to will nothing, know nothing and have nothing, not even a place in which God could work, so that if God wishes to act in the soul he himself must be the place of his work. That poverty returns man to what he was 'before he was', when in God there was neither God nor creature. The sermon was preached in the years when the Franciscan controversy over Christ's material poverty was stirring the Church; Eckhart shifts the question from having to being. It is the text most relied on by readings that compare him with Buddhist emptiness.

The early fourteenth-century controversy on evangelical poverty and beguine spirituality.

Quelle: Meister Eckhart. Die deutschen und lateinischen Werke. Herausgegeben im Auftrage der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1936– (Die deutschen Werke, ed. Josef Quint y Georg Steer; Die lateinischen Werke, ed. Konrad Weiß, Josef Koch, Loris Sturlese et al.).

Living without whysin-porque
'Sunder warumbe', without why, is the formula with which Eckhart describes the life that springs from the ground. If one asks life for a thousand years why it lives, it will answer: I live because I live; in the same way the just man works without seeking reward, not even heaven or God, because whoever seeks something by his works turns God into a means, like someone who milks a cow for the milk and cheese. The expression disqualifies every mercantile spirituality (that of the 'merchants' of Sermon 1) and makes gratuitousness the sign of union. Angelus Silesius turned it into verse in the seventeenth century ('The rose is without why; it blooms because it blooms') and Heidegger devoted pages to it in The Principle of Reason. For Eckhart it is not moral indifference: whoever lives without why does works with more freedom and more love, because he no longer needs them.

The scholastic ethics of intention and the critique of self-interested piety.

Quelle: McGinn, Bernard. The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing. Nueva York: Crossroad, 2001.

'Being is God' and 'God is understanding'esse-est-deus
The Latin works maintain two theses that seem to contradict each other. In the Parisian Questions of 1302 Eckhart states that God is understanding (intelligere) and that being, properly speaking, belongs to creatures: God is above being, as its cause. In the general prologue to the Opus tripartitum, on the other hand, he writes that 'being is God', because everything that is has being from God and nothing has being of itself: creatures, considered in themselves, are 'pure nothing'. Scholars have debated whether there is development or coherence; the most accepted reading sees one structure in both: God is the indistinct fullness (call it being or intellect) on which everything depends at every instant, and the creature has nothing of its own. This metaphysics underpins the German preaching: if man has nothing of his own, poverty and detachment are simply the truth.

Parisian scholastic metaphysics (Thomas Aquinas, Albert the Great, Dietrich of Freiberg) and the Liber de causis.

Quelle: Flasch, Kurt. Meister Eckhart: Philosoph des Christentums. Múnich: C. H. Beck, 2010. Trad. ingl.: Meister Eckhart: Philosopher of Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.

Videos

Videos

Aufnahmen, Gespräche und Dokumentarfilme. Die Videos werden von YouTube wiedergegeben; sie werden nicht hier gespeichert.

  • Meister Eckhart with Prof. Bernard McGinn

    Vortrag· EN· 2020· 70 min

    Lumen Christi InstituteOffizieller Kanal

  • Bernard McGinn on The Nothingness of God in Jewish and Christian Mysticism

    Vortrag· EN· 2017· 64 min

    University of GlasgowOffizieller Kanal

  • The Bible and Western Culture - Meister Eckhart: From Whom God Hid Nothing

    Vortrag· EN· 2020· 44 min

    Michael Sugrue

  • Meister Eckhart & Christian Mysticism

    Analyse· EN· 2021· 44 min

    Let's Talk Religion

  • Christian Mysticism, Vedanta und Meister Eckhart – by Swami Sarvapriyānanda

    Vortrag· EN· 2025· 84 min

    Vedanta GermanyOffizieller Kanal

  • La experiencia de Dios en el Maestro Eckhart: el nacimiento de Dios en el fondo del alma

    Vortrag· ES· 2023· 74 min

    Universidad Pontificia ComillasOffizieller Kanal

  • El todo y la nada de Dios: Maestro Eckhart (Inés Fuente)

    Vortrag· ES· 2016· 15 min

    Dominicos EspañaOffizieller Kanal

  • Conferencia sobre el Maestro Eckhart y Santo Tomás de Aquino

    Vortrag· ES· 2020· 83 min

    Facultad de Teología San Vicente Ferrer de ValenciaOffizieller Kanal

  • Silvia Bara Bancel: «San Juan de la Cruz, lector del Maestro Eckhart»

    Vortrag· ES· 2026· 109 min

    Centro de Estudios de HermenéuticaOffizieller Kanal

  • Dietmar Mieth: Mystik, Widerstand und Politik – Zugänge bei Meister Eckhart

    Vortrag· DE· 2021· 65 min

    Evangelische Akademie ThüringenOffizieller Kanal

  • «L'Ombra della Luce: Tommaso d'Aquino e Meister Eckhart» con Marco Vannini e Giuseppe Barzaghi

    Vortrag· IT· 2026· 120 min

    IstitutoTomisticoOffizieller Kanal

  • Marco Vannini | Distacco | festivalfilosofia 2024

    Vortrag· IT· 2024· 48 min

    FestivalfilosofiaOffizieller Kanal

Galerie

Galerie

Bilder mit geprüfter Lizenz. Jedes bewahrt seine Urheberschaft und seinen Herkunftsnachweis.

Handschriften

Handschriften

Handschriftliche Zeugen und alte Texte, mit ihrer verwahrenden Einrichtung und ihren Einsichtsbedingungen.

  • LA · Latina (gótica) · Obras de c. 1305–1326; copia del siglo XV

    Codex Cusanus 21 (obras latinas de Eckhart)

    Erhaltener Textzeuge
    Testigo principal del Opus tripartitum y de los comentarios bíblicos
    Verwahrende Einrichtung
    Biblioteca del Hospital de San Nicolás (Cusanusstift), Bernkastel-Kues · Cod. Cus. 21
  • LA · Latina (notarial) · 13 de febrero de 1327

    Instrumento notarial de la protesta de Colonia

    Erhaltener Textzeuge
    Original
    Verwahrende Einrichtung
    Archivo Apostólico Vaticano · Archivum Arcis, Arm. C, 1123
  • GMH · Latina (gótica) · c. 1340

    Paradisus anime intelligentis

    Erhaltener Textzeuge
    Manuscrito principal de la colección
    Verwahrende Einrichtung
    Bodleian Library, Oxford · MS. Laud Misc. 479
  • LA · Latina · 1326

    Rechtfertigungsschrift (Defensa)

    Erhaltener Textzeuge
    Copia única conocida
    Verwahrende Einrichtung
    Stadtbibliothek Soest
Handschriften →

Beziehungen

Beziehungen

Einflüsse, Schülerschaften und Verwandtschaften. Die belegte Beziehung wird von der durch Analyse ermittelten Ähnlichkeit unterschieden.

  • Verwandte Gedanken mit

    Hildegard of Bingen

    Two summits of spirituality in German lands with opposite paths: Hildegard's symbolic, imaginative vision and Eckhart's detachment from every image.

    Durch Analyse ermittelte Ähnlichkeit

  • Beeinflusst von

    Jesus of Nazareth

    His whole work is exegesis: Latin commentaries on the Gospel of John and German sermons on the Gospels of the day. His central doctrine, the birth of the Son in the soul, is a reading of the incarnation.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Beeinflusst von

    Plotinus

    Eckhart's metaphysics of the One, procession and return, and his negative theology are Neoplatonic in origin, received mainly through Augustine, Dionysius the Areopagite, Proclus (Liber de causis) and Macrobius rather than by direct reading of the Enneads.

    Durch Analyse ermittelte Ähnlichkeit

  • Verwandte Gedanken mit

    Adi Shankara

    In 1926 Rudolf Otto compared Eckhart's mysticism with Shankara's Advaita: both distinguish an attributeless absolute (Godhead / nirguna brahman) from its personal manifestation and place liberation in recognising the identity of the ground. Otto also stressed the differences, especially the living dynamism of Eckhart's God.

    Durch Analyse ermittelte Ähnlichkeit

  • Verwandte Gedanken mit

    Dōgen

    Since D. T. Suzuki and the Kyoto School (Nishitani, Ueda Shizuteru), Eckhart has been a partner of Zen: his 'nothing', the life 'without why' and detachment have been read alongside emptiness and Dōgen's dropping off of body and mind. There is no historical contact.

    Durch Analyse ermittelte Ähnlichkeit

  • Beeinflusste

    John of the Cross

    Rhineland mysticism reached sixteenth-century Spain through Latin and Castilian translations attributed to Tauler, Eckhart's disciple. Research (Silvia Bara Bancel) has studied John of the Cross as an indirect reader of Eckhart in the doctrine of nothingness and the ground of the soul; the exact route of transmission is still debated.

    Durch Analyse ermittelte Ähnlichkeit

  • Verwandte Gedanken mit

    Teresa of Ávila

    Both speak of a centre or ground of the soul where God dwells, but Teresa refuses to leave behind the Humanity of Christ and distrusts imageless prayer, distancing herself from the more speculative Eckhart.

    Durch Analyse ermittelte Ähnlichkeit

  • Verwandte Gedanken mit

    Francis of Assisi

    Sermon 52 transposes to the inner plane the poverty Francis lived materially, at a time when the Franciscan controversy over Christ's poverty divided the Church.

    Durch Analyse ermittelte Ähnlichkeit

  • Beeinflusste

    Eckhart Tolle

    Ulrich Tölle adopted the name Eckhart in homage to the Dominican master, as he himself has explained on his official channel.

    Belegte Beziehung

Quellen

Quellen

Für diesen Eintrag herangezogene Bibliografie und Kataloge.

  1. Wikidata, Q76548 «Meister Eckhart» (P31=Q5; 74 enlaces entre wikis).
  2. Meister Eckhart. Die deutschen und lateinischen Werke. Herausgegeben im Auftrage der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1936– (Die deutschen Werke, ed. Josef Quint y Georg Steer; Die lateinischen Werke, ed. Konrad Weiß, Josef Koch, Loris Sturlese et al.).
  3. McGinn, Bernard. The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing. Nueva York: Crossroad, 2001.
  4. Ruh, Kurt. Meister Eckhart: Theologe, Prediger, Mystiker. Múnich: C. H. Beck, 1985 (2.ª ed. 1989).
  5. Flasch, Kurt. Meister Eckhart: Philosoph des Christentums. Múnich: C. H. Beck, 2010. Trad. ingl.: Meister Eckhart: Philosopher of Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.
  6. Meister Eckhart. The Essential Sermons, Commentaries, Treatises, and Defense. Trad. e introd. de Edmund Colledge y Bernard McGinn. Nueva York: Paulist Press, 1981 (Classics of Western Spirituality; ISBN 0809123703).
  7. Acta Echardiana: documentos del proceso de Colonia y Aviñón (listas de artículos, defensa, apelación, protesta pública de 13 de febrero de 1327, votum de Aviñón, carta de Juan XXII de 30 de abril de 1328). Ed. Loris Sturlese, en Die lateinischen Werke, vol. V. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2000–2006.
  8. Juan XXII. Bula «In agro dominico», Aviñón, 27 de marzo de 1329. Texto en Denzinger–Hünermann, Enchiridion symbolorum, n.os 950–980; trad. ingl. en Colledge y McGinn (1981), 77–81.
  9. Vega Esquerra, Amador (ed. y trad.). Maestro Eckhart, El fruto de la nada y otros escritos. Madrid: Siruela, 1998; Alianza Editorial, 2011 (ISBN 9788420654966).
  10. Otto, Rudolf. West-östliche Mystik. Vergleich und Unterscheidung zur Wesensdeutung. Gotha: Leopold Klotz, 1926. Trad. ingl.: Mysticism East and West: A Comparative Analysis of the Nature of Mysticism. Nueva York: Macmillan, 1932.
  11. Ueda, Shizuteru. Die Gottesgeburt in der Seele und der Durchbruch zur Gottheit. Die mystische Anthropologie Meister Eckharts und ihre Konfrontation mit der Mystik des Zen-Buddhismus. Gütersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1965.
  12. Pfeiffer, Franz (ed.). Deutsche Mystiker des vierzehnten Jahrhunderts, vol. II: Meister Eckhart. Leipzig: G. J. Göschen, 1857; reimpr. anastática Gotinga: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1906.
  13. Open Library, registros de edición de las obras de Meister Eckhart (consultados por ISBN y por obra).
  14. Nicolás de Cusa. Apologia doctae ignorantiae (1449). Ed. Raymond Klibansky, Nicolai de Cusa Opera omnia, vol. II. Leipzig: Meiner, 1932.
  15. Eckhart Tolle. «Why Did You Choose the Name ‘Eckhart’?», canal oficial Eckhart Tolle en YouTube (vídeo no insertable).
  16. Bara Bancel, Silvia. «San Juan de la Cruz, lector del Maestro Eckhart». Conferencia, Centro de Estudios de Hermenéutica, 2026.
  17. Meister Eckhart. Werke. Texte und Übersetzungen von Josef Quint. Ed. y comentario de Niklaus Largier. 2 vols. Fráncfort: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1993.
  18. Field, Claud (trad.). Meister Eckhart's Sermons. Londres: H. R. Allenson, 1909. Texto en Christian Classics Ethereal Library.
Rechteinhaber
Dominio público (obras del siglo XIV). La edición crítica Die deutschen und lateinischen Werke (Kohlhammer) y las traducciones modernas (Quint, Largier, Walshe, Colledge y McGinn, Vega, Vannini) están sujetas a los derechos de sus editores.
Offizielle Website
www.eckhartsociety.org/

Bestätigung ausstehend

Was dieser Eintrag noch nicht klären konnte. Wir sagen es lieber, als es aufzufüllen.

  • Registrar individualmente los sermones alemanes que faltan (Pr. 3–4, 7–8, 10–11, 13–21, 23–47, 49–51, 53–70, 72–82, 84–85 de DW I–III y los de DW IV desde el 87, salvo 101–104), cada uno con su incipit según la edición crítica: no se ha podido consultar un índice fiable en línea y no se ha querido reconstruir de memoria.
  • Verificar con la edición crítica la grafía exacta de las citas en alemán medio marcadas como «probable» (Instrucciones 4, sermones 5b —«sin porqué»— y 83).
  • Localizar ISBN de Tratados y sermones (trad. Ilse M. de Brugger, Edhasa, 1983), de los Sermoni tedeschi (Adelphi, 1985) y de los volúmenes de la edición Kohlhammer.
  • Confirmar la signatura del manuscrito de Soest que conserva la defensa y la del códice de Erfurt (Amploniana) con obras latinas.
  • C. de B. Evans (traductor, 1924): fecha de muerte desconocida; la traducción queda marcada con precaución en la sala de lectura.
  • El fragmento de Gotinga (sermón 5b): confirmar institución custodia y signatura.
  • Las fechas de subida de los vídeos se han deducido de la fecha relativa que muestra YouTube.
  • Programas de afiliación: ninguno verificado.

Recherchiert am 2026-10-25