Daoismus

Laozi

老子 · 李耳 · 老聃 · 太上老君

um 571 v. Chr. – ?Historizität umstritten

Gründergestalt des Daoismus, der die chinesische Überlieferung das Daodejing zuschreibt, das kurze Buch vom Weg und von der Tugend. Sima Qian beschreibt ihn als Archivar am Hof der Zhou, den Konfuzius um Rat fragte und der nach Westen verschwand, nachdem er fünftausend Schriftzeichen diktiert hatte. Die moderne Forschung geht davon aus, dass der Text zwischen dem 4. und 3. Jahrhundert v. Chr. entstand und sein Verfasser weitgehend eine Konstruktion der Tradition ist; die Handschriften von Guodian und Mawangdui sind heute der feste Boden, auf dem die Debatte geführt wird.

Das Leben lesen Befragen

Werke: 12Werke
Ausgaben: 26Ausgaben
Zitate: 10Zitate
Videos: 11Videos
Bilder: 8Bilder

Laozi cabalgando un buey · Public domain

In eigenen Worten

«The Tao that can be trodden is not the enduring and unchanging Tao. The name that can be named is not the enduring and unchanging name.»

Daodejing, capítulo 1 (trad. inglesa de Legge, 1891)

Zum Einstieg ein Werk

Daodejing (Tao Te Ching). The Book of the Way and its Virtue

Volltext lesen

Der zentrale Gedanke

Dao (the Way): The word dao means "road", "way" and, by extension, "method" or "doctrine"; all Chinese schools use it.

Im Zusammenhang sehen

Biografie

5 Min. Lesezeit

Unterstützte Übersetzung aus dem spanischen Original, Durchsicht durch einen muttersprachlichen Übersetzer ausstehend.

Ein Name, der „der Alte Meister“ bedeutet

Über Laozi wissen wir mit Gewissheit sehr wenig; über sein Buch immer mehr. Diese Asymmetrie bestimmt die Gestalt. Der Name, unter dem wir ihn kennen, ist kein Eigenname, sondern ein Titel: Lao („alt“, „ehrwürdig“) und zi („Meister“). Die Überlieferung gibt ihm einen Familiennamen, Li, einen Rufnamen, Er („Ohr“), und einen Mannes- oder posthumen Namen, Dan; sie verlegt seine Geburt in das Dorf Quren im Kreis Ku, im südlichen Staat Chu, im heutigen Luyi in der Provinz Henan; und sie macht ihn zum Zeitgenossen – und etwas älteren Zeitgenossen – des Konfuzius, versetzt ihn also ins 6. Jahrhundert v. Chr. All dies geht letztlich auf eine einzige Seite zurück: das 63. Kapitel der Aufzeichnungen des Historikers (Shiji) des Sima Qian, um 94 v. Chr. verfasst, vier Jahrhunderte nach den Ereignissen, die es zu berichten vorgibt.

Bemerkenswert an dieser Seite ist ihre Redlichkeit. Sima Qian erzählt, Laozi sei „Historiker der Archive“ am königlichen Hof der Zhou gewesen, Konfuzius sei zu ihm gereist, um ihn über die Riten zu befragen; als er den Niedergang der Dynastie sah, sei er nach Westen aufgebrochen und habe auf Bitten des Grenzwächters Yin Xi ein Buch in zwei Teilen über den Sinn des Weges (dao) und der Tugend (de) geschrieben, von etwas mehr als fünftausend Schriftzeichen, worauf „niemand weiß, wo er geendet hat“. Doch gleich darauf zweifelt der Historiker laut: Vielleicht war Laozi Lao Laizi, ebenfalls aus Chu und Verfasser eines anderen Buches; vielleicht war er der Großhistoriograph Dan, der hundertneunundzwanzig Jahre nach dem Tod des Konfuzius den Herzog Xian von Qin aufsuchte. „In der Welt weiß niemand, ob es so ist oder nicht“, schließt er. Es ist das älteste Eingeständnis, dass die Gestalt schon zur Zeit der Han ein Problem war.

Was die Texte vor dem Shiji sagen

Vor Sima Qian erscheint der Name Lao Dan im Zhuangzi, im Lüshi chunqiu, im Han Feizi – das ihm zwei Kommentarkapitel widmet – und im Liji, wo Konfuzius sich erinnert, von ihm Einzelheiten der Begräbnisriten gelernt zu haben. Im Zhuangzi ist der Alte Meister ein Weiser, den ein geblendeter Konfuzius aufsucht und der in einer berühmten Passage des dritten Kapitels sogar stirbt, von seinen Schülern beweint. Keine dieser Erwähnungen erlaubt es, eine Person zu datieren; alle zeigen jedoch, dass es um das 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bereits die Gestalt eines greisen Meisters gab, der mit einem Wissen vom Weg verbunden war, und dass man diese Gestalt benutzte, um Konfuzius an ihr zu messen – und mitunter herabzusetzen.

Die neuere Forschung, von A. C. Graham bis D. C. Lau, hat mit einiger Wahrscheinlichkeit rekonstruiert, wie drei Fäden zu einer einzigen Figur verschmolzen: der Ritenmeister, den Konfuzius befragt, der daoistische Weise des Zhuangzi und der Historiograph Dan am Hof der Zhou. Das Ergebnis ist eine zusammengesetzte Biographie, nützlich für eine Schule, die einen Gründer brauchte, der älter war als Konfuzius. Deshalb führt dieser Eintrag ihn als Gestalt von umstrittener Geschichtlichkeit: Es gibt keinen Grund zu bestreiten, dass ein solcher Meister existierte, aber auch kein einziges Dokument, das es belegt.

Das Buch: von der Seidenrolle zu den Bambusstreifen

Das Daodejing – auch einfach Laozi genannt – ist ein Text von etwa fünftausend Schriftzeichen, traditionell in 81 kurze Kapitel gegliedert, viele davon in gereimten Versen. Es spricht von einem unnennbaren Weg, der Himmel und Erde vorausgeht, von der Kraft des Weichen über das Harte, vom Herrscher, der umso mehr erreicht, je weniger er eingreift, vom unbehauenen Holz, vom Wasser, das alles besiegt, weil es mit nichts wetteifert. Seine Form ist aphoristisch, seine Urheberschaft kollektiv: Die Fachleute sind sich einig, dass es sich um eine Anthologie von Sprüchen aus einer Weisheitstradition handelt, über Generationen gesammelt und geschliffen.

Jahrhundertelang war der älteste verfügbare Text derjenige, den der Kommentar des Wang Bi (226–249) festgelegt hatte, neben der Rezension, die dem „Alten vom Flussufer“ (Heshang Gong) zugeschrieben wird. Zwei archäologische Funde veränderten das Bild. 1973 kamen in Grab 3 von Mawangdui bei Changsha (Hunan), das 168 v. Chr. verschlossen worden war, zwei vollständige Abschriften auf Seide zum Vorschein, A und B genannt: die erste in kleiner Siegelschrift, älter als 195 v. Chr.; die zweite in Kanzleischrift, aus dem folgenden Jahrzehnt. Beide stellen den Abschnitt über die Tugend vor den Abschnitt über den Weg, sodass das Buch auch Dedaojing hätte heißen können. 1993 wurden in Grab 1 von Guodian bei Jingmen (Hubei), datiert um 300 v. Chr., 71 Bambusstreifen in drei Bündeln geborgen, die Material enthalten, das rund einunddreißig Kapiteln des überlieferten Textes entspricht – in anderer Reihenfolge und ohne die Feindseligkeit gegenüber konfuzianischer Menschlichkeit und Rechtschaffenheit, die die spätere Fassung kennzeichnet. Sie sind bis heute die ältesten Zeugen irgendeines chinesischen Klassikers und belegen, dass der Laozi gegen Ende des 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. bereits im Umlauf war, wenn auch noch nicht in seiner endgültigen Gestalt.

Vom Philosophen zum Gott

Das spätere Schicksal Laozis war außergewöhnlich. In der Han-Dynastie, als man das Daodejing zunehmend als Handbuch des Regierens und der Langlebigkeit las, stieg sein Verfasser vom Meister zum Unsterblichen auf. Im Jahr 165 n. Chr. brachte ihm Kaiser Huan in Luyi Opfer dar und gab bei Bian Shao die Laozi-Inschrift (Laozi ming) in Auftrag, in der der Alte Meister bereits als ein Wesen erscheint, das sich mit den Weltaltern wandelt. Im religiösen Daoismus, der mit den Himmelsmeistern entsteht, wird er zum Höchsten Alten Herrn (Taishang Laojun), dem Offenbarer heiliger Schriften; und in der Polemik mit dem Buddhismus wird man behaupten, er sei nach dem Überschreiten des Passes nach Indien gezogen, um „die Barbaren zu bekehren“ und als Buddha zu lehren. Die Tang-Dynastie, deren Kaiserhaus den Familiennamen Li trug, erhob ihn zu ihrem Ahnherrn: 666 verlieh ihm Kaiser Gaozong den Titel „Erhabener Kaiser des Geheimnisvollen Ursprungs“.

Der Westen entdeckte ihn spät und auf einen Schlag: Die erste vollständige Übersetzung in eine europäische Sprache ist die französische von Stanislas Julien (1842), gefolgt von der englischen James Legges (1891) und der deutschen Richard Wilhelms (1911). Seither ist das Daodejing neben der Bibel eines der meistübersetzten Bücher der Welt, und Laozi – der Mann, von dem wir nichts wissen – eine der unverwechselbarsten Stimmen der Geistesgeschichte. Was diese Stimme sagt, und nicht, wer sie erhob, ist das, was dieser Eintrag zu dokumentieren sucht.

Quellen: Sima Qian. Shiji (Memorias históricas), juan 63, «Laozi Han Fei liezhuan», y juan 47, «Kongzi shijia». c. 94 a. C. Ed. Zhonghua shuju, Pekín, 1959. Trad. francesa parcial: Chavannes, Les Mémoires historiques de Se-ma Ts'ien, 1895–1905. · Lau, D. C. (trad.). Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching. Penguin Classics, Harmondsworth, 1963 (introducción y apéndice «The problem of authorship»). ISBN 9780140441314. · Henricks, Robert G. Lao-Tzu: Te-Tao Ching. A New Translation Based on the Recently Discovered Ma-wang-tui Texts. Ballantine Books, Nueva York, 1989. ISBN 9780345370990. · Henricks, Robert G. Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching: A Translation of the Startling New Documents Found at Guodian. Columbia University Press, Nueva York, 2000. Edición príncipe: Jingmen shi bowuguan (ed.), Guodian Chu mu zhujian. Wenwu chubanshe, Pekín, 1998. · Kohn, Livia y LaFargue, Michael (eds.). Lao-tzu and the Tao-te-ching. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1998. Incluye A. C. Graham, «The Origins of the Legend of Lao Tan».

Zeitleiste

Das Leben, Jahr für Jahr

Jeder Punkt ist ein belegtes Ereignis. Klicken Sie, um es mit Quelle und Grad der Gewissheit zu lesen.

571 v. Chr.7071113521993

um 571 v. Chr.Quren, condado de Ku, Chu (hoy Luyi, Henan)

Traditional birth

Date and place assigned by late tradition to the birth of Li Er, "Laozi". The Shiji gives the place but not the date; the year is a convention that makes him somewhat older than Confucius. Years BCE are expressed as negative numbers.

ÜberlieferungSima Qian. Shiji (Memorias históricas), juan 63, «Laozi Han Fei liezhuan», y juan 47, «Kongzi shijia». c. 94 a. C. Ed. Zhonghua shuju, Pekín, 1959. Trad. francesa parcial: Chavannes, Les Mémoires historiques de Se-ma Ts'ien, 1895–1905.

um 571 v. Chr.
Traditional birth
Date and place assigned by late tradition to the birth of Li Er, "Laozi". The Shiji gives the place but not the date; the year is a convention that makes him somewhat older than Confucius. Years BCE are expressed as negative numbers.
Überlieferung
VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr.
Archivist at the Zhou court
According to Sima Qian, Laozi was "historian in charge of the archives" (shoucangshi zhi shi) of the Zhou royal house. It is the only office tradition attributes to him.
Überlieferung
um 518 v. Chr.
Confucius consults him on the rites
The Shiji (chs. 47 and 63), the Liji and the Zhuangzi relate a visit by Confucius to the Old Master. The date is a conjecture of commentators; for critical scholarship the episode is a construction meant to subordinate Confucius.
Überlieferung
V. Jahrhundert v. Chr.
Departure westward and dictation of the book
Seeing the decline of Zhou, Laozi departs; the keeper of the pass, Yin Xi, asks him to set down his knowledge and he composes the book in two parts on the Way and Virtue. "No one knows where he ended."
Überlieferung
um 300 v. Chr.
Guodian slips: the earliest witness
Tomb 1 at Guodian is sealed with 71 bamboo slips containing material from some 31 chapters of the Laozi, in three bundles. It proves the text was already circulating by the late 4th century BCE, though not in its final form.
Belegt
um 240 v. Chr.
Wang Bi's commentary
The young philosopher Wang Bi (226–249) fixes the text and commentary that would be, for seventeen centuries, the reference version of the Daodejing.
Belegt
um 195 v. Chr. – 168 v. Chr.
Mawangdui silk copies
Two complete silk copies of the Laozi (A and B), the first earlier than 195 BCE and the second from the following years, are placed in tomb 3, sealed in 168 BCE. Both put the De section before the Dao section.
Belegt
165 v. Chr.
Emperor Huan offers him sacrifices
Emperor Huan of the Han sends offerings to Laozi's birthplace and Bian Shao composes the Inscription for Laozi (Laozi ming), the earliest testimony of his deification.
Belegt
um 94 v. Chr.
Sima Qian writes the first biography
Chapter 63 of the Shiji gathers what was told of Laozi and confesses the doubt: he may have been Li Er, Lao Laizi or the historian Dan. It is the source of almost everything tradition would repeat.
Belegt
666
Ancestor of the Tang imperial house
Emperor Gaozong, surnamed Li, grants Laozi the title Taishang Xuanyuan Huangdi ("August Emperor of the Mysterious Origin"), consecrating the dynasty's claim of descent.
Belegt
1842
First complete translation into a European language
Stanislas Julien publishes Lao Tseu, Tao Te King at the Royal Press in Paris. Legge (1891) and Wilhelm (1911) would follow.
Belegt
1973
Discovery of the Mawangdui manuscripts
The excavation of Mawangdui tomb 3 brings to light the two silk copies of the Laozi, now in the Hunan Museum.
Belegt
Oktober 1993
Discovery of the Guodian slips
The Jingmen Museum excavates Guodian tomb 1 and recovers the three bundles of Laozi slips, published in 1998.
Belegt

Werke

Grundlegende Werke

Die Werke, ohne die sich das Vermächtnis nicht verstehen lässt.

Traditionelle Zuschreibung · um 300 v. Chr.

Daodejing (Tao Te Ching). The Book of the Way and its Virtue

道德經

Some five thousand characters in 81 short chapters, many in verse, divided into two parts: the Way (chs. 1–37) and Virtue (38–81). It sets out an unnameable Dao, prior to heaven and earth, which engenders everything without possessing it; it proposes to ruler and sage non-action (wuwei), spontaneity (ziran), the simplicity of the uncarved block and the strength of the soft, symbolised by water. Its tone shifts between mysticism, political strategy and critique of civilisation. It is, with the Bible, one of the most translated books in the world.

Das Buch kaufen Das Buch ansehen Volltext lesen

15 Ausgaben · amazon.de

Laozi

The Guodian Laozi (bundles A, B and C)

The Conscious Library

Handschrift · um 300 v. Chr.

The Guodian Laozi (bundles A, B and C)

郭店楚簡《老子》甲、乙、丙

The 71 slips contain some two thousand characters corresponding to 31 chapters of the received text, in a different order and with substantive variants: missing, for instance, is the attack on benevolence and righteousness in chapter 18. Bundle C is accompanied by the Taiyi sheng shui ("The Great One Gave Birth to Water"), a cosmological text unknown until then. Published in 1998 as Guodian Chu mu zhujian, they are the oldest witness of the Laozi and have forced the text's history to be rewritten.

Nicht verfügbar Das Buch ansehen

2 Ausgaben

Handschrift · um 195 v. Chr.

The Mawangdui Laozi (silk copies A and B)

馬王堆帛書《老子》甲本、乙本

Both copies place the part on Virtue (De) before that on the Way (Dao), lack chapter divisions and present hundreds of variants against Wang Bi's text, many minor and some weighty (such as "the Way is great" instead of "Heaven is great" in chapter 25). Published in 1980 by Wenwu, they formed the basis of Henricks's translation (1989) and revolutionised study of the text.

Das Buch kaufen Das Buch ansehen

2 Ausgaben · amazon.com

Das gesamte Werk (12)

Zitate

Zitate, die in einem bestimmten Werk nachgewiesen sind. Jedes trägt seine Herkunft und seinen Grad an Verlässlichkeit.

The Tao that can be trodden is not the enduring and unchanging Tao. The name that can be named is not the enduring and unchanging name.

道可道，非常道。名可名，非常名。

GeprüftDaodejing, capítulo 1 (trad. inglesa de Legge, 1891)

1 / 10

Apokryphe Zitate oder Zitate umstrittener Zuschreibung (3)

«If you are depressed you are living in the past. If you are anxious you are living in the future. If you are at peace you are living in the present.»
Appears in no chapter of the Daodejing nor in any ancient source on Laozi. It has circulated online since the early 21st century; its psychological vocabulary ("depressed", "anxious") is modern.
«Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.»
Attributed indiscriminately to Laozi, Confucius or a "Chinese proverb". It is found neither in the Daodejing nor in the Analects; its modern form is first documented in English in Anne Isabella Thackeray Ritchie's novel Mrs. Dymond (1885).
«Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage.»
No correspondence in the Daodejing. Possibly a very loose paraphrase of chapter 67 ("compassion gives courage"), turned into a sentimental maxim.

Letzte Worte

Es gibt keine überprüfbaren Aufzeichnungen der letzten Worte.

No record exists. Sima Qian closes the biography with "no one knows where he ended" (莫知其所終). The Zhuangzi (ch. 3) relates the death of Lao Dan and his disciples' mourning, but as a parable on attachment, without final words; later hagiographies make him an immortal and therefore deathless.

Quelle: Sima Qian. Shiji (Memorias históricas), juan 63, «Laozi Han Fei liezhuan», y juan 47, «Kongzi shijia». c. 94 a. C. Ed. Zhonghua shuju, Pekín, 1959. Trad. francesa parcial: Chavannes, Les Mémoires historiques de Se-ma Ts'ien, 1895–1905.

Fragen

Was das Werk beantwortet

Zwölf große Fragen der Menschheit und was sich aus den Texten darauf antworten lässt, mit Belegen. Wir legen niemandem Worte in den Mund.

Was ist das Absolute? Gibt es Gott?
The Dao that can be named is not the constant Dao
Das UnnennbareAusdrücklich gesagt
The Daodejing, the text attributed to Laozi, opens with the warning that the Dao that can be spoken is not the constant Dao, and the name that can be named is not the constant name. In chapter 25 it describes something formed in undifferentiation, prior to heaven and earth, silent and empty, that may be the mother of the world: the text declares it does not know its name and calls it Dao for want of another. In chapter 4 it suggests it seems to precede even the ancestral Lord (di). The Dao is not a personal God: chapter 5 states that heaven and earth are not benevolent and treat beings as straw dogs. Nor is it mere nothing: it begets, nourishes and does not possess. The ultimate here is what precedes every name, which language can only point to obliquely.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Wer bin ich? Gibt es ein wahres Selbst?
No theory of the self: it advises emptying it, putting it last, knowing oneself
Nicht geäußert
The Daodejing, attributed to Laozi, does not pose the question of a true self in terms of a soul or a Self. What it offers are practical indications about the self. Chapter 7 says that the sage puts his person last and is therefore first, and that precisely by having no private interests he fulfils them. Chapter 13 links great afflictions to having a body, understood as the self that protects itself. Chapter 19 recommends lessening the private and reducing desires, and chapter 33 distinguishes knowing others, which is intelligence, from knowing oneself, which is clarity. Its ideal is the simplicity of the uncarved block. From all this one can infer a distrust of the self-assertive self, but no doctrine of what the self is.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Warum leiden wir?
Abandoning the Way brings desire, rivalry and disaster
Soziale und moralische UnordnungAus der Lehre abgeleitet
The Daodejing does not pose suffering as a metaphysical problem, but it does diagnose the causes of disorder. When the great Dao is abandoned, says chapter 18, humaneness and righteousness appear as belated remedies; when cleverness and cunning arise, great hypocrisy appears. Chapter 46 states that there is no greater misfortune than not knowing contentment and no greater fault than the desire to acquire; chapter 12, that the five colours blind the eyes and rare goods lead conduct astray. Anxiety, war and ruin arise from forced action, the urge to accumulate and estrangement from natural simplicity. The remedy is not a salvation but a return: acting without forcing (wuwei), knowing when enough is enough, and going back to the root, which chapter 16 calls stillness.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Was geschieht nach dem Tod?
Returning to the root: the text describes no personal beyond
Schweigen oder ZurückhaltungAus der Lehre abgeleitet
The Daodejing does not describe what happens to the person after death. It speaks of death, but in another register. Chapter 16 presents the life of all beings as a return to the root, which it calls stillness and the fulfilment of destiny; chapter 50 contrasts those who cling to life and shorten it with the one who knows how to preserve it; chapter 74 warns that it is useless to threaten with death a people that no longer fears it. Chapter 33 contains a disputed line — one who dies without perishing is long-lived — which some read as permanence in the Dao and others as lasting fame. What the text allows us to affirm is an attitude: to accept the cycle of arising and returning, neither forcing life nor fearing its end. The quest for physical or spiritual immortality belongs to the later Daoist tradition.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Wie erlangt man Befreiung oder Erlösung?
There is no salvation to attain: one returns to the root, to the Way
Durch Tugend und HarmonieAus der Lehre abgeleitet
The Daodejing does not speak of salvation or liberation in a religious sense. What it proposes is a return: attaining utmost emptiness, keeping stillness and watching the ten thousand things go back to their root, what chapter 16 calls knowing the constant. The path is not cumulative: whoever devotes himself to learning increases daily, and whoever devotes himself to the Way decreases, until reaching non-action (wuwei), according to chapter 48. Hence the call to simplicity, to fewer desires and to abandoning cleverness and prescriptive morality (chapter 19). The fruit is not escape from the world but living in accord with the course of things, without forcing it, and thereby enduring without danger.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Braucht es einen Lehrer?
The sage teaches without words; slighting the teacher, however clever, is great confusion
Hilfreich, aber nicht unverzichtbarAus der Lehre abgeleitet
The Daodejing does not treat discipleship as an institution, but it offers two indications. The first is that the sage teaches without words (chapter 2; also 43): his teaching is his way of being, not a doctrinal body or an authority imposed. The second is in chapter 27: the good man is the teacher of the one who is not good, and the one who is not good is material for the good; not to value the teacher nor care for the material is, however much one knows, a great confusion. The teacher therefore has value, though his way of transmitting is silent example. Since the Way cannot be spoken (chapter 1), no verbal instruction delivers it entirely.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Ist die Welt wirklich?
The ten thousand things are born of the Way and return to it in constant cycle
Natürliche Ordnung im WandelAusdrücklich gesagt
The Daodejing does not ask whether the world is real or illusory; it describes it as a process. The Way begets the one, the one the two, the two the three, and the three the ten thousand things (chapter 42); things arise from being and being from non-being (chapter 40), and all eventually return to their root (chapter 16). The course of the world is an alternation of opposites that generate each other, soft and hard, full and empty, and the Way follows what is so of itself (ziran, chapter 25). The world is therefore fully real but changing; wisdom consists in attuning to that course without forcing it.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Was ist Liebe?
The highest good is like water: it benefits without contending or proclaiming itself
Was erscheint, wenn das Ich aufhörtAus der Lehre abgeleitet
The Daodejing distrusts love understood as a virtue to be preached. Chapter 5 says that Heaven and Earth are not benevolent (ren) and treat beings as straw dogs; chapter 18, that humaneness and righteousness appear when the great Dao has been lost; chapter 38, that superior virtue does not regard itself as virtuous and therefore has virtue. Against the cultivated benevolence of the Confucians, the text proposes a goodness without self-assertion: that of water, which benefits all beings and does not contend with them (ch. 8), and that of the sage, who puts himself last and therefore comes first (ch. 7). Among its three treasures, chapter 67 names compassion (ci), comparable to a mother's care, from which courage is born. True love is not manufactured: it flows when the urge to stand out ceases.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Sind wir frei, oder ist alles vorherbestimmt?
The Daodejing does not pose freedom: it proposes moving with the Dao
Nicht geäußert
The *Daodejing* does not know the dilemma between free will and determinism as the West framed it, and attributing a position to it would be anachronistic. What it offers is something else: the Dao acts without acting and nothing is left undone (ch. 37), and the sage imitates that non-forcing (*wuwei*). In chapter 16, returning to the root is stillness, and stillness is «returning to one's destiny» (*fuming*): destiny is not an imposed chain but each being's own course, to which it is fitting to return. Chapter 73 adds that Heaven's net is vast and wide-meshed, yet nothing slips through. The freedom the text cares about is not choosing among options but ceasing to resist the natural course of things.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Wozu meditieren oder beten?
Empty and still oneself to watch all things return to their root
Die Wirklichkeit sehen, wie sie istAus der Lehre abgeleitet
The *Daodejing* describes no meditation technique, but it contains passages the Daoist tradition read as such. Chapter 16 asks one to reach utmost emptiness and hold fast to stillness; then, as the ten thousand beings arise together, one watches their return: all things flourish and go back to their root. Chapter 10 asks whether one can embrace unity without parting from it, make the breath soft as a newborn's and cleanse the mysterious mirror until it is spotless. Chapter 48 adds that the Way is followed by diminishing each day. The aim is not an extraordinary experience, but to see clearly the natural movement of things and stop getting in its way.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Kann die Vernunft das Letzte erkennen?
The Dao that can be spoken is not the constant Dao
Das Letzte liegt jenseits des VerstandesAusdrücklich gesagt
The *Daodejing* opens by denying that the ultimate can be captured in words: the Way that can be spoken is not the enduring Way, and the name that can be named is not the enduring name (ch. 1). Throughout the text accumulated knowledge appears as an obstacle: whoever devotes himself to learning increases each day, whoever devotes himself to the Way diminishes each day (ch. 48); the one who knows does not speak and the one who speaks does not know (ch. 56). This is not irrationalism but the conviction that the Dao precedes every conceptual distinction and is known only by ceasing to impose categories on it. The knowledge it proposes is of another order: clarity (*ming*) in knowing oneself and in contemplating the return of things.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
Sich von der Welt zurückziehen oder sie verwandeln?
Governing without forcing: of the best ruler the people barely know he exists
Die Gesellschaft ordnenAusdrücklich gesagt
Although the legend recorded by Sima Qian tells that Laozi left the Zhou court and departed westward, the Daodejing is largely addressed to the ruler. Its ideal is not withdrawal but an order achieved without imposing: of the best ruler the people barely know he exists (ch. 17); the more prohibitions, the poorer the people, and the sage does not act and the people transform themselves (ch. 57); governing a great state is like frying a small fish, without stirring it too much (ch. 60). Chapter 80 describes a small, sparsely populated community, content with what it has, where the neighbours' cocks can be heard and no one feels the need to travel. Wisdom is realised in the world and in politics, but through non-action (wuwei): reducing desires, weapons and laws until the natural order is restored.
Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen

Affinitäten und Spannungen

Frage für Frage aus den Positionen berechnet. Den Grund jeder Übereinstimmung und jedes Widerspruchs zeigt ein Klick.

Denkt ähnlich wie

Denkt anders als

Widerspruch beiGrundsätzliche Meinungsverschiedenheit

Laozi · Teresa of Ávila

A Thou who loves versus a Way without a name

For Teresa of Ávila the Absolute is a Thou: the Book of Her Life (ch. 8) defines prayer as friendly converse with the one we know loves us, and in the seventh dwelling places of the Interior Castle the three Persons of the Trinity communicate themselves to the soul and remain in it. The Daodejing opens by warning that the Dao that can be spoken is not the constant Dao; in chapter 25 it says it does not know its name and calls it Dao for want of another, and in chapter 5 it states that heaven and earth are not benevolent and treat beings as straw dogs. Teresa converses with the ultimate, which knows, seeks and loves her; the Daodejing points to it sideways, as a faceless mother that gives birth and does not possess. In her the Absolute is relationship; in the text, source.

Warum: The contradiction is substantive, not verbal. Teresa writes within the Catholic faith and for nuns who pray; her language is that of the revelation of a God who has made himself known as a person in Christ, and her whole itinerary depends on someone answering. The Daodejing is an anthology of aphorisms from the fourth and third centuries BCE, addressed partly to rulers, which describes the course of things and distrusts any preached benevolence. There is a point of contact: Teresa too admits that what is received in the higher dwelling places exceeds the understanding. But in her that ineffability is that of a friend too great; in the Daodejing, that of a principle that is no one's friend.

Widerspruch beiGrundsätzliche Meinungsverschiedenheit

Laozi · Confucius

Two orders for a world at war: ritual that gives form and the Way that removes it

Both seek order and both locate wisdom in government, not in withdrawal: Confucius answers the hermits that one cannot live with birds and beasts (Analects 18.6), and the Daodejing wants a ruler whose existence the people barely notice (ch. 17). But the remedy is opposite. Confucius orders through virtue, ritual and the rectification of names: let the prince be a prince and the father a father (12.11). The Daodejing sees those very virtues as symptoms of the illness: when the great Dao is abandoned, humaneness and righteousness appear (ch. 18), and ritual is the husk of loyalty and the beginning of disorder (ch. 38). One adds cultivated form; the other removes it until the natural course of things restores itself.

Warum: The conflict is real and polemical, though between texts and schools rather than persons. The Daodejing names and discredits the central Confucian concepts, humaneness, righteousness and ritual, which suggests it was composed, at least in part, against that school. The meeting between Confucius and Laozi recounted by Sima Qian in the Records of the Grand Historian (ch. 63) belongs to legend and is not considered historical. The underlying difference is anthropological: Confucius trusts that cultivated form educates human nature; the Daodejing suspects that every imposed form falsifies it. Chinese culture eventually read them as complementary, one for public office and the other for retirement.

Übereinstimmung bei

Laozi · Jiddu Krishnamurti

What can be said is not it: the nameless Way and the pathless land

The Daodejing opens by denying that the ultimate can be captured in words (ch. 1) and adds that whoever pursues learning increases daily while whoever pursues the Way decreases daily (ch. 48), and that the one who knows does not speak (ch. 56). Krishnamurti holds that thought is the response of memory and therefore always limited and old, unable to touch the immeasurable, and that every God that is thought is a projection (Freedom from the Known; The Ending of Time). Both refuse to build doctrine about the ultimate, distrust accumulated knowledge as a way to it and propose knowledge of another order: the clarity of one who empties and contemplates, in the Daodejing; the perception that arises when thought sees its limit and falls silent, in Krishnamurti.

Warum: There is no record that Krishnamurti engaged with the Daodejing; the affinity is structural. Both react against an excess of form: the Chinese text, against the proliferation of virtues, rites and learning in the schools of its time; Krishnamurti, against organisations, beliefs and spiritual methods, starting with those of the Theosophical Society that raised him. Hence the same gesture of subtraction. The difference lies in context and aim: the Daodejing also addresses the ruler and seeks a natural order of the community; Krishnamurti speaks to individuals and seeks a mutation of consciousness. One contemplates the return of things to their root; the other, the movement of thought.

Anekdoten und Erzählungen

Mündliche Überlieferungs. VI a. C. (tradicional)

Confucius asks about the rites

The most repeated scene of Chinese tradition brings its two masters face to face. Confucius, still young, travels to the Zhou capital to consult Laozi, the court archivist, about the rites. The Old Master answers with a lesson in detachment: "Those of whom you speak are already dead and their bones have turned to dust; only their words remain. The gentleman, if he finds his moment, rides in a carriage; if he does not, he walks with his head covered like a vagrant. I have heard that the good merchant hides his treasure as if he had nothing, and that the gentleman of full virtue looks like a fool. Rid yourself of your pride and your many desires, of your affected air and your ambitions: none of that serves you. That is all I have to tell you." The episode appears in the Shiji (chs. 47 and 63), in the Liji—where Confucius recalls having learned from Lao Dan details of funeral rites—and, in mocking tone, in several chapters of the Zhuangzi. Historians regard it as a construction of the Taoist school to place its founder above the Confucian one; but it was so influential that a stele in Luoyang still marks the spot where "Confucius questioned Laozi about the rites."

Herkunft der Erzählung: Shiji 63 ("Biography of Laozi and Han Fei") and 47 ("Hereditary House of Confucius"); Liji, "Zengzi wen"; Zhuangzi, chs. 13, 14 and 21. Analysed as a school legend by A. C. Graham, "The Origins of the Legend of Lao Tan" (in Kohn and LaFargue, 1998).

Mündliche Überlieferungs. VI a. C. (tradicional)

"Today I saw Laozi: he is like a dragon"

On returning from the interview, the disciples ask Confucius what he made of the Old Master. According to Sima Qian, the Master replies: "Of birds I know that they fly; of fish, that they swim; of beasts, that they run. For what runs one can set a net; for what swims, a line; for what flies, a corded arrow. But the dragon, which rises to heaven riding wind and clouds, I do not know how to catch. Today I saw Laozi: he is like a dragon!" The image fixed forever the relation between the two figures: Confucius, the man of rules and of what can be learned; Laozi, the ungraspable. The dragon thereafter became an emblem of Laozi himself, and the scene—with the carriage, the disciples and the old man—one of the most depicted motifs in Chinese iconography, from Han funerary reliefs to Ming paintings.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Shiji 63. The comparison with the dragon does not appear in sources earlier than Sima Qian.

Hagiographische Erzählungs. VI–V a. C. (tradicional)

The keeper of the pass and the five thousand characters

Laozi lives a long time in Zhou; when he sees the dynasty declining, he leaves. On reaching the pass—later tradition would identify it with Hangu, the gorge dividing the Yellow River valley from the central plain—the keeper Yin Xi says to him: "Since you are about to withdraw, I beg you to write a book for me." Laozi then composes a text in two parts, on the meaning of the Way and of Virtue, of somewhat more than five thousand characters, and departs. "No one knows where he ended." Thus, in six lines, Sima Qian explains the origin of the Daodejing and the disappearance of its author. Taoist hagiography would enrich the scene: Yin Xi will have seen from his tower a purple cloud coming from the east, sign of a sage's arrival; the journey will continue to India; the keeper will be the first disciple and recipient of new scriptures. Zhang Lu's painting illustrating this entry, with Laozi astride an ox, is the Ming version of that moment. Historically, the story serves to give an author and an occasion to a text that archaeology has shown to be anonymous and cumulative.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Core in Shiji 63; expansions in the Liexian zhuan (1st–2nd c.), Ge Hong's Shenxian zhuan (4th c.) and the Scripture of Western Ascension (5th c.).

Belegtc. 94 a. C.

Sima Qian's three Laozis

The most revealing anecdote about Laozi is not a story about him but about his historian. After recounting Confucius's visit and the departure westward, Sima Qian pauses: "Some say that Lao Laizi was also from Chu, that he wrote a book in fifteen chapters on the use of the Way and that he was a contemporary of Confucius." And he adds: "Laozi lived, it is said, more than one hundred and sixty years; others say more than two hundred, through cultivating the Way and nourishing longevity. One hundred and twenty-nine years after the death of Confucius, the annals relate that the Grand Historian Dan of Zhou visited Duke Xian of Qin... Some say Dan was Laozi; others, that he was not. No one in the world knows whether this is so or not." He closes with a phrase worth his whole biography: "Laozi was a hidden gentleman." That the first biographer confessed not knowing who his subject was, and offered three candidates two centuries apart, is the most solid datum we have; on it rests the modern discussion, which sees in "Laozi" the fusion of a master of rites, a sage of Chu and a Zhou archivist.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Literal text of Shiji 63. The critical reading follows A. C. Graham (1986/1998) and D. C. Lau (introduction to his translation, 1963).

Hagiographische Erzählungsiglos II–IV (hagiografía Han y Jin)

Eighty-one years in his mother's womb

The hagiographies explain the Old Master's name literally. According to the Shenxian zhuan attributed to Ge Hong (4th century), his mother conceived him while gazing at a shooting star—or on swallowing a pearl fallen from heaven—and carried him in her womb for seventy-two years, or by other accounts eighty-one, as many as his book has chapters. He was born beneath a plum tree (li), whence he took his surname, and he was born already old, with white hair and the long ears that earned him the name Er. Other versions have him emerge from his mother's left side, as the Buddha from Maya's, in a contest of marvels with the Buddhism then taking root in China. None of this claims to be history: it is the biography of a god in the making, the Lord Lao who transforms himself from era to era and who, in the Inscription for Laozi of 165, is already described as coeval with primordial chaos. But these tales fixed the image by which he has been represented ever since: an old man with a domed forehead and long ears, often riding an ox.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Shenxian zhuan ("Biographies of Divine Immortals"), entry on Laozi; Inscription for Laozi (Laozi ming, 165); Laozi bianhua jing (Dunhuang S.2295). Reference study: Anna Seidel, La divinisation de Lao tseu dans le taoïsme des Han (1969); Shenxian zhuan translated by Robert F. Campany (2002).

Quelle: Campany, Robert Ford. To Live as Long as Heaven and Earth: A Translation and Study of Ge Hong's Traditions of Divine Transcendents. University of California Press, Berkeley, 2002.

Umstrittensiglos II–XIII

The conversion of the barbarians

Around 300 CE, as Buddhism gained ground among the Chinese elites, the Taoist Wang Fu wrote a book to explain that foreign religion: after crossing the pass, Laozi had not disappeared but had journeyed on to India where, under the name of Buddha, he taught the barbarians a simplified and severe version of his doctrine suited to their coarseness. Buddhism would thus be Taoism for foreigners, and its return to China the homecoming of a native teaching. The theory had a respectable precedent—already in the 2nd century a memorial to Emperor Huan said that Laozi "had gone to the barbarians and become the Buddha"—and an extremely long life: for eight centuries Buddhists and Taoists debated before the emperors over the Scripture of the Conversion of the Barbarians, until Kublai Khan, after a public debate in 1281, ordered every copy burned. Fragments survived at Dunhuang. The episode shows how far Laozi's life went on being written according to the disputes of each age.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Memorial of Xiang Kai (166) in the Hou Hanshu; Wang Fu's Laozi huahu jing (c. 300), known from Dunhuang fragments and quotations; debates of 1255–1281 at the Mongol court. Study: Erik Zürcher, The Buddhist Conquest of China (1959).

Quelle: Zürcher, Erik. The Buddhist Conquest of China: The Spread and Adaptation of Buddhism in Early Medieval China. Brill, Leiden, 1959 (cap. 6 sobre la teoría del huahu).

Lehren

Die Begriffe, die das Denken gliedern, in ihrem Zusammenhang erklärt.

Dao (the Way)dao

The word dao means "road", "way" and, by extension, "method" or "doctrine"; all Chinese schools use it. What is distinctive in the Daodejing is to make it the name of what has no name: a reality prior to heaven and earth, "confused and complete", which engenders the ten thousand beings without possessing them and which the text calls "mother". The first chapter warns that the Way that can be spoken is not the constant Way: the Dao is not a concept but the ground from which concepts arise, and so it can only be pointed to by images—water, the valley, the bellows, the root. It also has a practical dimension: to follow the Dao is to accord with the way things happen of themselves, without forcing them. In Wang Bi it will be identified with non-being (wu) as ground; in religious Taoism, with the body of Lord Lao; in Western reception, often with the Logos or the absolute. Archaeology shows that at Guodian the term already had this cosmological sense by around 300 BCE.

Core of philosophical Taoism; shared with the Zhuangzi and reinterpreted by Confucianism, Chan Buddhism and Neo-Confucianism.