Aller au contenu
The ConsciousLibrary

Aristotélisme

Aristotle

Ἀριστοτέλης · أرسطوطاليس

384 av. J.-C. – 322 av. J.-C.Personne historiquement documentée

Philosophe et savant grec (384-322 av. J.-C.), disciple de Platon pendant vingt ans, précepteur d'Alexandre le Grand et fondateur du Lycée d'Athènes. Il créa la logique formelle, ordonna le savoir en disciplines et laissa des traités de physique, de biologie, de psychologie, de métaphysique, d'éthique, de politique, de rhétorique et de poétique qui dominèrent la philosophie grecque, arabe, juive et chrétienne pendant deux millénaires. Son idée de la vie contemplative comme forme suprême du bonheur demeure une référence centrale.

œuvres
67œuvres
éditions
245éditions
citations
18citations
vidéos
15vidéos
images
9images
Busto de Aristóteles (Museo Nacional Romano, Palazzo Altemps)

Busto de Aristóteles (Museo Nacional Romano, Palazzo Altemps) · Public domain

Dans ses propres mots

«“All men by nature desire to know.”»

Metafísica I (A) 1, 980a21. Inglés: trad. de W. D. Ross (Oxford, 1908); español: trad. propia del griego.

Metaphysics — Aristotle

Pour commencer, une œuvre

Metaphysics

Son idée centrale

Substance (ousia): For Aristotle, “being” is said in many ways, but all of them refer to a first one: substance.

Biographie

6 min de lecture

Traduction assistée à partir de l'original espagnol, en attente de relecture par un traducteur natif.

Un fils de médecin aux confins de la Macédoine

Aristote naquit en 384 av. J.-C. à Stagire, petite cité grecque de Chalcidique, sur la côte septentrionale de l'Égée. Son père, Nicomaque, était médecin et ami du roi Amyntas III de Macédoine, et la famille se disait issue d'Asclépios par Machaon ; sa mère, Phaestis, était originaire de Chalcis, en Eubée. Tous deux moururent alors qu'il n'était encore qu'un adolescent, et sa tutelle échut à Proxène d'Atarnée, dont le philosophe honorerait la mémoire dans son testament en commandant une statue à son effigie. Cette enfance passée parmi les médecins et les courtisans explique, selon nombre de spécialistes, deux traits de sa vie : la passion d'observer les êtres vivants et un lien avec la maison royale de Macédoine qui finirait par décider de son destin.

Il faut prévenir d'emblée que presque tout ce que nous savons de sa vie provient de sources tardives. La biographie la plus développée est celle de Diogène Laërce, rédigée au IIIe siècle apr. J.-C. à partir d'auteurs hellénistiques comme Hermippe et Apollodore ; s'y ajoutent les Vies composées par les commentateurs néoplatoniciens, plus pieuses que critiques, et une tradition hostile qui le dépeignait vaniteux et flatteur des rois. La recherche moderne, depuis Ingemar Düring, distingue avec soin les données chronologiques, probablement fiables, des anecdotes.

Vingt ans à l'Académie

À dix-sept ans, vers 367 av. J.-C., il arriva à Athènes et entra à l'Académie de Platon, où il demeura vingt ans, jusqu'à la mort du maître. Il y fut élève, chercheur, puis bientôt professeur de rhétorique. Il écrivit alors des dialogues destinés au grand public — le Gryllos, l'Eudème, le Protreptique, De la philosophie — dont Cicéron admirerait la prose comme « un fleuve d'or » ; il n'en reste que des fragments. C'est probablement aussi de ces années que datent les premières versions de ses écrits de logique.

Sa relation avec Platon fut celle d'un disciple qui discute. Diogène Laërce rapporte un mot attribué au maître : Aristote lui aurait décoché des ruades « comme les poulains ruent contre la mère qui les a mis au monde ». Sa critique de la théorie des Idées traverse la Métaphysique et l'Éthique à Nicomaque, où il avoue qu'il lui est pénible de réfuter des amis, mais que la piété commande de préférer la vérité. Werner Jaeger proposa en 1923 de lire son œuvre comme un éloignement progressif du platonisme ; on juge aujourd'hui cette chronologie trop nette, mais la tension qu'il avait relevée demeure bien réelle.

L'Asie Mineure, Lesbos et la cour de Macédoine

À la mort de Platon, en 348/347 av. J.-C., l'Académie étant passée aux mains de son neveu Speusippe, Aristote quitta Athènes. Il s'installa à Assos, en Troade, sous la protection d'Hermias, seigneur d'Atarnée, auquel le liait une étroite amitié, et épousa Pythias, nièce et fille adoptive de celui-ci ; ils eurent une fille du même nom. Vers 345/344, il gagna Mytilène, à Lesbos, où il travailla aux côtés de Théophraste, natif d'Érèse. Les nombreuses mentions de la lagune de Pyrrha dans l'Histoire des animaux ont conduit à y situer une bonne part de ses observations sur les poissons, les mollusques et les oiseaux.

En 343/342, Philippe II l'appela en Macédoine pour éduquer son fils Alexandre, alors âgé de treize ans. Selon Plutarque, les leçons se donnaient dans le sanctuaire des Nymphes de Miéza, et le prince garda toute sa vie une Iliade corrigée par son maître. Aristote obtint la reconstruction de Stagire, rasée par les Macédoniens. Vers 341, Hermias fut capturé par traîtrise par les Perses et mis à mort ; Aristote lui consacra un hymne à la Vertu et une épigramme pour sa statue de Delphes, qui devaient plus tard lui coûter cher.

Le Lycée

En 335/334, peu après l'avènement d'Alexandre, il revint à Athènes. Métèque, il ne pouvait posséder de terres ; il enseigna donc au Lycée, gymnase public consacré à Apollon Lycien, dont les promenoirs couverts — le peripatos — valurent à l'école le nom de péripatéticienne. Il y rassembla une bibliothèque et y organisa un travail collectif sans précédent : le recueil de cent cinquante-huit constitutions de cités grecques, la liste des vainqueurs aux Jeux pythiques, dressée avec son parent Callisthène, et une masse d'observations zoologiques et botaniques.

Les traités que nous conservons ne sont pas des livres polis à l'intention du public, mais des matériaux d'enseignement sans cesse remaniés : logique, physique, psychologie, biologie, métaphysique, éthique, politique, rhétorique et poétique. Cette nature explique leur densité, leurs redites et leur étonnante ampleur. Pythias mourut à Athènes ; Aristote vécut ensuite avec Herpyllis, de Stagire, dont il eut un fils, Nicomaque. Ses rapports avec Alexandre se refroidirent après la mort de Callisthène, accusé d'avoir conspiré contre le roi en 327.

Chalcis, le testament et le destin des livres

La mort d'Alexandre à Babylone, en juin 323, déchaîna à Athènes une vague antimacédonienne. Le hiérophante Eurymédon accusa Aristote d'impiété, en prenant pour prétexte l'hymne à Hermias, et le philosophe se retira à Chalcis, dans la maison de sa famille maternelle. Une tradition ancienne lui prête le mot selon lequel il ne permettrait pas aux Athéniens de pécher deux fois contre la philosophie, par allusion à Socrate. Il y mourut en 322, à soixante-deux ou soixante-trois ans, de mort naturelle selon la chronologie d'Apollodore ; la version selon laquelle il aurait bu de l'aconit, que Diogène Laërce emprunte à Eumélos, ne mérite aucun crédit.

Diogène Laërce a recopié son testament, l'un des documents personnels les plus émouvants de l'Antiquité. Aristote y nomme Antipater exécuteur testamentaire, recommande Herpyllis et ses enfants, affranchit plusieurs esclaves, interdit de vendre ceux qui l'avaient servi et demande que, quel que soit le lieu de sa sépulture, on dépose auprès de lui les ossements de Pythias, comme elle-même l'avait souhaité.

Selon Strabon et Plutarque, sa bibliothèque passa à Théophraste, puis de celui-ci à Nélée de Scepsis, dont les héritiers la cachèrent dans une cave ; un collectionneur, Apellicon de Téos, l'acheta, et Sylla l'emporta à Rome après avoir pris Athènes en 86 av. J.-C. C'est là qu'Andronicos de Rhodes aurait édité les traités dans l'ordre où, pour l'essentiel, nous les lisons encore. Les spécialistes discutent la portée de ce récit, mais le corpus actuel procède bel et bien d'une édition du Ier siècle av. J.-C.

Deux millénaires de magistère

Aucun philosophe n'a connu une postérité aussi longue. Les commentateurs grecs, d'Alexandre d'Aphrodise aux néoplatoniciens d'Athènes et d'Alexandrie, firent de sa logique la porte d'entrée de toute philosophie, même si Plotin critiqua durement ses catégories. Au IXe siècle, ses œuvres furent traduites en arabe à Bagdad ; al-Fârâbî fut surnommé « le second maître », Avicenne reconstruisit sa métaphysique et Averroès mérita le titre de « Commentateur ». Al-Ghazâlî combattit les philosophes qui le suivaient, et Maïmonide le tint pour le sommet de l'entendement humain en ce qui concerne le monde sublunaire.

Depuis Tolède, au XIIe siècle, puis grâce aux traductions de Guillaume de Moerbeke au XIIIe, son œuvre entra dans les universités latines. Pour Thomas d'Aquin, il était tout simplement « le Philosophe », et Dante le plaça dans les Limbes comme « le maître de ceux qui savent ». La révolution scientifique renversa sa physique, mais sa biologie résista : Darwin écrivit en 1882 que Linné et Cuvier, ses deux dieux, n'étaient que « de simples écoliers » à côté du vieil Aristote.

L'édition de l'Académie de Berlin, dirigée par Immanuel Bekker à partir de 1831, fixa la numérotation par page, colonne et ligne selon laquelle on le cite encore — Métaphysique 980a21 —, et en 1891 un papyrus du British Museum rendit au jour la Constitution d'Athènes. Au XXe siècle, son éthique de la vertu revint au centre du débat moral. Au lecteur d'une bibliothèque de la conscience, Aristote offre quelque chose de moins évident qu'une doctrine spirituelle : la conviction que la vie la plus haute est la vie contemplative, celle de l'intellect qui se connaît lui-même, et qu'on y parvient en éduquant patiemment les habitudes de chaque jour.

Sources: Cicerón. Académicos II (Lúculo), 119: «veniet flumen orationis aureum fundens Aristoteles». · Diógenes Laercio. Vidas de los filósofos ilustres, libro V, 1–35 («Aristóteles»). Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vol. I, Loeb Classical Library 184. Londres: Heinemann, 1925 (texto en Wikisource). · Natali, Carlo. Aristotle: His Life and School. Ed. D. S. Hutchinson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. · Düring, Ingemar. Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1957. · Barnes, Jonathan (ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press (Bollingen Series LXXI.2), 1984.

Chronologie

La vie, année après année

Chaque point est un événement documenté. Cliquez pour le lire, avec sa source et son degré de certitude.

  1. 384 av. J.-C. · 0 ans

    Birth at Stagira

    Aristotle is born, son of the physician Nicomachus and of Phaestis. Apollodorus, quoted by Diogenes Laertius, dates the birth to the first year of the 99th Olympiad (384/383 BCE).

    Documenté

  2. v. 370 av. J.-C.

    Orphaned, in the care of Proxenus

    His parents having died while he was still a child, he passes into the care of Proxenus of Atarneus. The detail comes from the late Lives; the will confirms the bond by commissioning a statue of Proxenus.

    Probable

  3. 367 av. J.-C. · 17 ans

    Entry into Plato's Academy

    At seventeen he comes to Athens and enters the Academy, where he will remain for twenty years as student, researcher and teacher.

    Documenté

  4. v. 360 av. J.-C.

    The public dialogues

    He writes dialogues and exhortations for a wide readership — Gryllus, Eudemus, Protrepticus, On Philosophy — now lost except for fragments.

    Probable

  5. 347 av. J.-C. · 37 ans

    Plato's death and departure from Athens

    After Plato's death and Speusippus's election as head of the Academy, he leaves Athens and settles at Assos with Hermias of Atarneus.

    Documenté

  6. v. 346 av. J.-C.

    Marriage to Pythias

    He marries Pythias, Hermias's niece and adopted daughter; they will have a daughter of the same name.

    Probable

  7. 345 av. J.-C.

    Lesbos and biological research

    In the archonship of Eubulus (345/344) he moves to Mytilene. With Theophrastus he studies the fauna of the lagoon of Pyrrha, the basis of much of his zoological work.

    Documenté

  8. 343 av. J.-C. · 41 ans

    Tutor to Alexander

    Philip II summons him to Macedonia to educate the thirteen-year-old Alexander. According to Plutarch, the lessons take place in the sanctuary of the Nymphs at Mieza.

    Documenté

  9. v. 341 av. J.-C.

    Execution of Hermias; the hymn to Virtue

    Hermias is treacherously captured by the Persians and executed. Aristotle composes in his honour a hymn to Virtue and an epigram for his statue at Delphi, both preserved by Diogenes Laertius.

    Documenté

  10. 335 av. J.-C. · 49 ans

    Foundation of the Lyceum

    He returns to Athens (335/334) and teaches in the gymnasium of the Lyceum for thirteen years. His followers will be called Peripatetics.

    Documenté

  11. v. 330 av. J.-C.

    The 158 constitutions and the Pythian list

    He directs the collection of the constitutions of 158 cities and, with Callisthenes, the list of victors at the Pythian Games, honoured by Delphi with an inscription.

    Documenté

  12. 327 av. J.-C.

    Death of Callisthenes

    Callisthenes, Aristotle's kinsman and historian of the expedition, dies accused of conspiring against Alexander; ancient sources place here the cooling between the king and his former teacher.

    Probable

  13. 323 av. J.-C. · 61 ans

    Charge of impiety and retreat to Chalcis

    After Alexander's death, the hierophant Eurymedon charges him with impiety over the hymn to Hermias. He withdraws to Chalcis in Euboea, to his mother's family house.

    Documenté

  14. 322 av. J.-C. · 62 ans

    Death at Chalcis

    He dies at Chalcis aged sixty-two or sixty-three, a natural death according to Apollodorus, in the same year as Demosthenes. His will is preserved by Diogenes Laertius.

    Documenté

  15. 86 av. J.-C.

    The library reaches Rome

    According to Strabo and Plutarch, Sulla carries off to Rome the library of Apellicon of Teos, which contained the manuscripts of Aristotle and Theophrastus.

    Contesté

  16. Ie siècle av. J.-C.

    Andronicus of Rhodes's edition

    Andronicus of Rhodes arranges and edits the school treatises in the first century BCE; the corpus we possess derives from his edition.

    Probable

  17. IXe siècle

    Translations into Arabic

    In the ninth century the Baghdad translators, among them Hunayn ibn Ishaq and his son Ishaq, render most of the corpus into Arabic, the foundation of falsafa.

    Documenté

  18. 1255

    Aristotle in the University of Paris curriculum

    A 1255 statute of the Paris Faculty of Arts places practically all the known works of Aristotle on the curriculum, after decades of prohibitions.

    Documenté

  19. 1495

    Aldus Manutius's editio princeps

    Aldus Manutius prints in Venice (1495–1498) the first edition of Aristotle's Greek text, in five volumes.

    Documenté

  20. 1831

    Bekker's edition

    The Prussian Academy publishes Immanuel Bekker's edition, whose pagination (for example, 980a21) remains the universal system of reference.

    Documenté

  21. 1891

    The Constitution of the Athenians reappears

    Frederic Kenyon publishes, from a papyrus acquired by the British Museum, the Constitution of the Athenians, lost since antiquity.

    Documenté

Œuvres

Œuvres essentielles

Les œuvres sans lesquelles on ne comprend pas son héritage.

Metaphysics — Aristotle

Œuvre écrite

Metaphysics

Τὰ μετὰ τὰ φυσικά

The work in which Aristotle seeks “first science”: the study of being qua being, of the highest causes and principles and of divine substance. It opens with the famous sentence “all men by nature desire to know” and with a history of earlier philosophy read as a progressive discovery of the four causes. Book B sets out the puzzles; Γ defends the principle of non-contradiction; Δ is a philosophical lexicon; Z, H and Θ, the core, examine substance, form, matter, actuality and potentiality; Λ culminates in the first unmoved mover, “thinking of thinking”; M and N criticise the Platonic theory of Forms and numbers. No work has influenced Western, Islamic and Jewish metaphysics more.

6 éditions · amazon.com

Nicomachean Ethics — Aristotle

Œuvre écrite

Nicomachean Ethics

Ἠθικὰ Νικομάχεια

The most influential work of ethics in history. It starts from the question of the highest human good, which everyone calls happiness, and defines it as an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue over a complete life. It explains ethical virtue as habit and as a mean chosen according to right reason, analyses courage, temperance, liberality, magnanimity and justice, distinguishes the intellectual virtues — with practical wisdom at their centre —, studies incontinence and pleasure, and devotes two admirable books to friendship. Book X concludes that the happiest life is the contemplative one, in which a human being lives according to what is divine in him, and leads into the Politics.

4 éditions · amazon.com

Politics — Aristotle

Œuvre écrite

Politics

Πολιτικά

A continuation of the Ethics: if happiness is the end of the individual, the city is the community that makes it possible. Book I holds that the human being is by nature a political animal, endowed with speech, and studies the household, economics and — in pages unacceptable today — natural slavery. Book II criticises Plato's Republic and the constitutions of Sparta, Crete and Carthage; book III defines the citizen and classifies regimes into correct (monarchy, aristocracy, polity) and deviant (tyranny, oligarchy, democracy); books IV–VI, based on the 158 constitutions collected at the Lyceum, analyse the causes of revolutions and praise the mixed regime resting on the middle classes; books VII–VIII describe the ideal city and its education.

4 éditions · amazon.com

Poetics — Aristotle

Œuvre écrite

Poetics

Περὶ ποιητικῆς

The founding text of Western literary theory. It conceives poetry as imitation (mimesis) of human actions, natural to human beings and a source of knowledge and pleasure, and claims it is more philosophical than history because it speaks of the universal. It defines tragedy as the imitation of a serious and complete action which, through pity and fear, accomplishes the purification (katharsis) of such emotions, and analyses its six parts, with the plot as the “soul” of the work, reversal, recognition and the tragic error (hamartia). Rediscovered in the Renaissance, it dictated the rules of classical drama for centuries.

5 éditions · amazon.com

Citations

Citations localisées dans une œuvre précise. Chacune porte sa provenance et son degré de fiabilité.

“All men by nature desire to know.”

Πάντες ἄνθρωποι τοῦ εἰδέναι ὀρέγονται φύσει.

VérifiéeMetafísica I (A) 1, 980a21. Inglés: trad. de W. D. Ross (Oxford, 1908); español: trad. propia del griego.

1 / 18
Citations apocryphes ou d'attribution contestée (3)
  • «“We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.”»

    Not Aristotle's: it is a paraphrase by Will Durant in The Story of Philosophy (1926), chapter on Aristotle, summarising in his own words the doctrine of Nicomachean Ethics II 1 on virtue as habit. The sentence circulates as if it were a direct quotation.

  • «“Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas” (“Plato is a friend, but truth is a greater friend”).»

    The idea is in Nicomachean Ethics I 6, 1096a16, but the Latin formula is not his. An ancient Life of Aristotle attributed to Ammonius transmits it as “Socrates is a friend, but truth is a greater friend”; Roger Bacon uses it with Socrates, Newton writes “amicus Plato, amicus Aristoteles, magis amica veritas”, and the version with Plato appears in Don Quixote.

  • «“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.”»

    It is found in no work of Aristotle. It appears attributed to him in American books from 1959 (Lowell L. Bennion, Religion and the Pursuit of Truth) and seems a distortion of Nicomachean Ethics I 3, 1094b23–25, which says that an educated person looks for as much precision in each subject as its nature admits.

Dernières paroles

Il n'existe aucun témoignage vérifiable de ses dernières paroles.

No reliable final sentence survives. The nearest thing to last words is his will, copied by Diogenes Laertius (V 11–16): it opens “All will be well; but, in case anything should happen, Aristotle has made these dispositions”, and closes with the instruction to lay the bones of Pythias beside him and to set up statues of Zeus and Athena the Saviours at Stagira. Contradictory accounts of his death circulated: a natural death at sixty-three (Apollodorus, accepted by Diogenes Laertius), poisoning with aconite (Eumelus, rejected by Diogenes himself) and, in late authors, the legend that he threw himself into the strait of Euripus because he could not explain its currents, with no basis in the early sources. The remark about not letting Athens “sin twice against philosophy” belongs to his departure from Athens, not to his deathbed.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas de los filósofos ilustres, libro V, 1–35 («Aristóteles»). Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vol. I, Loeb Classical Library 184. Londres: Heinemann, 1925 (texto en Wikisource).

Interroger

Ce que répond son œuvre

Douze grandes questions de l'humanité et ce que ses textes permettent d'y répondre, références à l'appui. Nous ne lui prêtons jamais de paroles.

  • Qu'est-ce que l'Absolu ? Dieu existe-t-il ?

    A first unmoved mover that is thought thinking itself

    Un Absolu impersonnelIl le dit expressément

    Aristotle reaches God through physics and metaphysics, not revelation. If there is eternal motion, there must be a first mover that moves without being moved; in book Lambda of the Metaphysics this mover is pure actuality, without matter, and moves as the beloved moves, by attraction. Its life is the best: it is thought, and since the most excellent can only think itself, it is thought of thought. Aristotle calls it god and an eternal living being, but it does not create the world, which is eternal, nor know individuals nor answer prayer. It is an absolute that is faceless intelligence, final cause of everything, closer to a principle than to someone.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qui suis-je ? Existe-t-il un vrai soi ?

    The soul is the body's form; character is forged by habit and friendship

    Un soi cultivé dans la relationIl le dit expressément

    Aristotle rejects both Plato's separate soul and the atomists' materialism. In On the Soul he defines it as the form, the first actuality of a natural body that has life potentially: it makes no sense to ask whether soul and body are one, any more than to ask it of the wax and its shape. What we call character is not given: virtues are acquired by habit, becoming just by doing just acts. And the human being, by nature a political animal, is fulfilled only in the city and in friendship: the friend is another self. Only intellect, which in an obscure passage he calls separable, immortal and eternal, escapes this embodied form.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi souffrons-nous ?

    Happiness depends on virtue, but also on fortune and the city

    Le désordre social et moralCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    Aristotle does not ask about suffering in general but about why a life fails. His answer has several layers. The main one is vice: an ill-formed character, which does not feel pleasure and pain at the right things, lives in conflict with itself, and in book IX he describes the wicked man as someone who flees from himself. But virtue is not enough: happiness also needs external goods, and great misfortunes like Priam's can ruin it, though the good man bears them nobly. And since we are political animals, a badly ordered city and a bad education deform their citizens. Pain comes from disorder of character, from fortune and from the community.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Que se passe-t-il après la mort ?

    The soul dies with the body; perhaps only intellect is immortal

    Silence ou réserveCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    If the soul is the form of the living body, as On the Soul maintains, it cannot exist without it, just as shape does not exist without wax; Aristotle describes no destiny of the individual soul after death. The exception is a brief and obscure passage: the intellect that makes all things is separable, impassive and unmixed, and it alone is immortal and eternal, though “we do not remember”. Since antiquity it has been debated whether that intellect is personal, common to all humans or even divine. The Ethics treats death as the most fearful of evils because it is an end, and the courageous man is the one who faces it nobly. About the beyond, Aristotle keeps his reserve.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Comment atteint-on la libération ou le salut ?

    Happiness is activity of the soul according to virtue, culminating in contemplation

    Par la vertu et l'harmonieIl le dit expressément

    Aristotle seeks no exit from the world but the accomplished life within it. The Nicomachean Ethics defines happiness as activity of the soul in accordance with virtue over a complete life: one swallow does not make a spring. Moral virtues are acquired by habit and consist in a mean determined by practical reason; friendship and the city are their natural setting. In book X he adds that the highest activity is contemplation, because it is that of intellect, the most divine thing in us, and urges us to make ourselves immortal as far as possible. There is no grace or sudden illumination: there is cultivated excellence that makes a human happy insofar as one can be.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Faut-il un maître ?

    Virtues are learned through good habits, laws and educators

    Utile mais pas indispensableIl le dit expressément

    Aristotle, who spent twenty years in the Academy and later founded the Lyceum, gives great weight to education but does not make it initiatory transmission. Moral virtues are acquired by habit, so it matters a great deal, or rather everything, to be habituated one way or another from youth. For this good educators and good laws are needed, and the Ethics ends by passing to the Politics precisely because the legislator is the great educator. But nobody can be virtuous for another: we become just by doing just acts. And in theoretical knowledge, loyalty to the teacher yields to truth: both being dear, piety requires preferring truth, he says when criticising Plato.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Le monde est-il réel ?

    An eternal nature, in motion, that does nothing in vain

    Un ordre naturel en transformationIl le dit expressément

    Aristotle is the defender par excellence of the reality of the sensible world. Against Parmenides, he explains change through potentiality and actuality; against Plato, he places forms in things themselves. Nature is a principle of motion and rest in what possesses it, and acts for an end: it does nothing in vain. The cosmos is eternal, without beginning or end, with a heaven of perfect circular motion and a sublunary region of ceaseless generation and corruption. Even the humblest animals deserve study, because in all natural things there is something marvellous. The world is real, ordered and changing, and knowing it is the task of science.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qu'est-ce que l'amour ?

    Perfect friendship is wishing the other's good for their own sake

    Une bienveillance ordonnéeIl le dit expressément

    Aristotle devotes two books of the Nicomachean Ethics to friendship (philia), which he considers necessary for life: no one would choose to live without friends even with all other goods. He distinguishes three kinds by their motive — utility, pleasure and the good — and only the last is perfect and lasting: that of good people who wish the friend's good for the friend's sake. The friend is another self, and right self-love, that of one who loves the best in himself, is its foundation. Friendship has its degrees and proportions: that of parents and children, of spouses, of fellow citizens. It is an ordered goodwill that begins in the household and sustains the city.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Sommes-nous libres ou tout est-il déterminé ?

    It is in our power to be virtuous and also to be vicious

    Un libre arbitre réelIl le dit expressément

    In book III of the Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle analyses the voluntary and the involuntary to delimit responsibility. Involuntary are acts forced from outside or done through ignorance of the circumstances; the others have their principle in the agent. Deliberate choice (prohairesis) bears on what depends on us, and it follows that virtue and vice are in our power: where it is up to us to act, it is also up to us not to act. Even character, once formed, is our responsibility, because we formed it by our acts. In On Interpretation he further argues that future contingents are not already settled.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi méditer ou prier ?

    Contemplation is the highest and happiest activity

    Voir la réalité telle qu'elle estIl le dit expressément

    Aristotle does not speak of prayer in a personal sense; his god hears no supplications. But he places at the summit of human life an activity that has something of what other traditions call meditation: contemplation (theoria). In book X of the Nicomachean Ethics he describes it as the activity of intellect, the most divine thing in us; it is the most continuous, the most pleasant, the most self-sufficient, the only one loved for its own sake, and in it a human lives according to what is divine in him. Its object is truth: causes, principles, the eternal. To contemplate is to see what is as it is, with no other end than seeing it.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • La raison peut-elle connaître l'ultime ?

    All humans by nature desire to know, up to the first causes

    L'étude et le savoirIl le dit expressément

    The Metaphysics opens by stating that all humans by nature desire to know, and that philosophy was born of wonder. For Aristotle reason can know the ultimate: wisdom is the science of first causes and principles, and it culminates in theology, the study of the first mover. The way is long and gradual: from sensation to memory, from memory to experience, from experience to art and science; first principles are grasped by intellect through induction. None of this is received by revelation: it is learned by inquiry, gathering the opinions of predecessors and examining their puzzles. Knowledge of the divine is the highest fruit of study.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Se retirer du monde ou le transformer ?

    Man is a political animal: the good life is realised in the city

    Ordonner la sociétéIl le dit expressément

    For Aristotle the human being is by nature a political animal, and whoever cannot live in community or does not need it is either a beast or a god. The city exists for the sake of living well, and its good is greater and more complete than the individual's; that is why ethics leads into politics and legislation. Aristotle studied one hundred and fifty-eight constitutions and discussed in the Politics which regime is best. At the same time, in book X of the Ethics he places the contemplative life, the most divine and happiest, above the political life. But even the contemplative, as a human, lives among others and chooses to act in accordance with virtue.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres

Anecdotes et récits

Anecdotes et récits

Tradition oralec. 367–347 a. C.

The colt that kicked its mother

Aristotle spent twenty years in the Academy, and tradition kept two opposite images of that companionship. According to the Neoplatonic Lives, Plato called him “the reader”, because he devoured books, and “the mind of the school”. But Diogenes Laertius records another, more bitter remark put in the master's mouth: “Aristotle spurns me, as colts kick out at the mother who bore them.” It was said that the disciple had broken away from the Academy while Plato was still alive, which the chronology contradicts: he stayed until 348/347. What the remark condenses is real: the critique of the theory of Forms that Aristotle would develop in the Metaphysics and the Ethics, always with the courtesy of one speaking of “friends”, and always without yielding. The anecdote says less about Plato than about the image antiquity formed of Aristotle: at once the most faithful and the most rebellious of students.

Origine du récit: The colt remark is in Diogenes Laertius V 2 (“they say Plato said”); the nicknames “reader” and “mind” come from the Neoplatonic Lives (Vita Marciana and related texts), collected by Düring (1957). None is contemporary.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas de los filósofos ilustres, libro V, 1–35 («Aristóteles»). Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vol. I, Loeb Classical Library 184. Londres: Heinemann, 1925 (texto en Wikisource).

Témoignage343/342–340 a. C.

Alexander's tutor at Mieza

When Philip II sought a teacher for his thirteen-year-old son, he chose the son of his own father's former physician. Plutarch relates that, to keep the prince away from the court, the lessons were given in the sanctuary of the Nymphs at Mieza, where in his day the stone seats and shady walks of Aristotle were still pointed out. There Alexander learned ethics and politics, and also those more reserved doctrines the philosophers called acroamatic. Years later, in Asia, the king wrote to his teacher to complain that he had published those lessons: how would he excel others if what he had learned were open to all? Aristotle is said to have replied that they were published and not published, since only those who had attended them would understand them. Plutarch adds that Alexander slept with an Iliad corrected by the philosopher, “the one from the casket”, next to his dagger.

Origine du récit: Plutarch, Life of Alexander 7–8 (late first century CE). The exchange of letters he quotes is almost certainly a later composition; the stay at Mieza and the teacher-pupil relationship are well attested.

Source: Plutarco. Vida de Alejandro, 7–8. Trad. inglesa de Bernadotte Perrin, Plutarch's Lives, vol. VII, Loeb Classical Library 99. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1919.

Documentéc. 341 y 323 a. C.

A hymn for an executed friend

Hermias of Atarneus, a former slave who had become ruler of a small state on the coast of Asia Minor, had welcomed Aristotle after Plato's death and given him his niece Pythias in marriage. Around 341 a general in Persian service lured him to a meeting, seized him and sent him to the Great King, who had him executed. Aristotle answered with poetry: a hymn to Virtue in which Hermias, “the nursling of Atarneus”, stands beside Heracles, Achilles and Ajax among those who died for her, and an epigram for his statue at Delphi denouncing the Persian king's treachery. Diogenes Laertius preserves both texts. Nearly twenty years later, when Athens sought a pretext against the Macedonian philosopher, the hierophant Eurymedon charged him with impiety for having sung a mortal with the honours due to a god. That hymn of friendship forced him to flee.

Origine du récit: Diogenes Laertius V 5–8 transmits the hymn, the epigram and the charge; Athenaeus (Deipnosophists XV 696a–697b) also preserves the hymn and part of the ancient debate about its religious character.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas de los filósofos ilustres, libro V, 1–35 («Aristóteles»). Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vol. I, Loeb Classical Library 184. Londres: Heinemann, 1925 (texto en Wikisource).

Tradition orale323 a. C.

“I will not let Athens sin twice against philosophy”

In the summer of 323 news reached Athens of Alexander's death in Babylon. The city, subject to Macedon since Chaeronea, rose up, and the philosopher who had educated the king and enjoyed the friendship of the regent Antipater became a natural target. When he was charged with impiety, Aristotle did not wait for the trial. He left for Chalcis in Euboea, where his mother's family had a house and where the Macedonian garrison protected him. Tradition attributes to him an explanation that has gone round the world: he did not want the Athenians to sin twice against philosophy. Seventy-six years earlier the city had condemned Socrates to death on a similar charge. The remark is less an admission of fear than the words of a man who knew the city's history and refused to play its most tragic part a second time.

Origine du récit: The remark is recorded by Aelian (Varia Historia III 36) and the Neoplatonic Lives, several centuries later. Diogenes Laertius documents the charge and the retreat to Chalcis, but not the remark; handbooks cite it as traditional.

Source: Eliano. Historias curiosas (Varia historia) III, 36; Aulo Gelio. Noches áticas XIII, 5 y XX, 5.

Documenté322 a. C.

The will of Chalcis

Antiquity seldom lets us hear the private voice of a philosopher. Aristotle's will, which Diogenes Laertius says he had come across, is one such occasion. It opens with a serene formula — “all will be well; but, in case anything should happen…” — and names as executor Antipater, the most powerful man in Greece. Then it descends to small things: his daughter Pythias will marry Nicanor when she is of age; Herpyllis, “in memory of the steady affection she has borne towards me”, will receive a talent of silver, three maids and whichever house she prefers, at Chalcis or his father's house at Stagira; several slaves will be freed, and none of those who served him will be sold. He orders statues of his mother, of Proxenus, of his brother Arimnestus, who died childless. And he asks for something that has nothing to do with property: that, wherever he is buried, the bones of Pythias, his first wife, be laid beside him, as she herself had wished.

Origine du récit: Diogenes Laertius V 11–16, who states that he found the document. Most specialists (Düring, Natali) consider it substantially authentic; Arabic versions of the will also exist.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas de los filósofos ilustres, libro V, 1–35 («Aristóteles»). Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vol. I, Loeb Classical Library 184. Londres: Heinemann, 1925 (texto en Wikisource).

Tradition oralec. 323–322 a. C.

The wine of Lesbos

Aulus Gellius relates that, old and ill, Aristotle was asked by his disciples to name a successor. There were two obvious candidates: Theophrastus of Lesbos and Eudemus of Rhodes. The philosopher asked for wine from Rhodes and from Lesbos, tasted the first and praised it — “a sound and pleasant wine” —; then tasted the second and said that both were excellent, but that the Lesbian was sweeter. The disciples understood. Theophrastus, his companion in the researches at the lagoon of Pyrrha, would lead the Lyceum for more than three decades and inherit his master's library. The story, elegant and discreet, works as a parable of how a teacher can name a successor without humiliating the other candidate.

Origine du récit: Aulus Gellius, Attic Nights XIII 5 (second century CE), with no known earlier source. That Theophrastus succeeded Aristotle is documented; the wine scene is a late anecdote.

Source: Eliano. Historias curiosas (Varia historia) III, 36; Aulo Gelio. Noches áticas XIII, 5 y XX, 5.

Contestéc. 287–40 a. C.

The books in the cellar

Strabo, who studied with the grammarian who handled those rolls, tells an extraordinary story. Theophrastus bequeathed Aristotle's library and his own to Neleus of Scepsis in the Troad. Neleus's heirs, people with no interest in philosophy, hid it in a cellar so that the kings of Pergamum, who were hunting books for their library, would not seize it. There, amid damp and moths, the rolls lay for nearly two centuries, until the bibliophile Apellicon of Teos bought them for a good price, copied them, filling the gaps unskilfully, and took them to Athens. When Sulla took the city in 86 BCE he seized the library and moved it to Rome, where the grammarian Tyrannion and then Andronicus of Rhodes put the texts in order. According to Strabo, the Peripatetics after Theophrastus, lacking those books, had hardly been able to philosophise seriously.

Origine du récit: Strabo, Geography XIII 1, 54, and Plutarch, Life of Sulla 26. Modern scholars accept the library's journey to Rome and Andronicus's edition but doubt that the treatises were unknown for two centuries: there are signs that copies circulated.

Source: Estrabón. Geografía XIII, 1, 54; y Plutarco, Vida de Sila, 26 (sobre la biblioteca de Aristóteles y Teofrasto, Neleo de Escepsis, Apelicón y Andrónico de Rodas).

Documentéc. 330 a. C. (redacción de la Ética nicomáquea)

Plato is a friend, but truth is a greater friend

In the first book of the Nicomachean Ethics, on reaching Plato's theory of the Good itself, Aristotle pauses. He knows he is about to criticise a doctrine introduced by “friends of ours”, and says so: the inquiry is made uphill by that fact. Yet, he adds, it would seem better, indeed our duty, to sacrifice what touches us closely for the sake of truth, especially as we are philosophers; for, while both are dear, piety requires us to honour truth above our friends. From those few lines came one of the most quoted mottoes of European culture. An ancient Life of Aristotle summed it up as “Socrates is a friend, but truth is a greater friend”; the scholastics repeated it; Newton wrote it in Latin at the head of his student notebooks, and Cervantes put it in Don Quixote with Plato's name. In its origin it is not a lapidary maxim but the confession of a disciple who argues with his master without ceasing to love him.

Origine du récit: The passage is Nicomachean Ethics I 6, 1096a11–17 (documented). The Latin formula “Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas” is later: the Life attributed to Ammonius, Roger Bacon (Opus maius I 7), Newton (Quaestiones quaedam philosophicae, c. 1664) and Cervantes mark its spread.

Source: Bekker, Immanuel (ed.). Aristotelis Opera, edidit Academia Regia Borussica. 5 vols. Berlín: G. Reimer, 1831–1870 (vols. I–II, texto griego, 1831).

Enseignements

Enseignements

Les notions qui structurent sa pensée, expliquées dans leur contexte.

Substance (ousia)ousia
For Aristotle, “being” is said in many ways, but all of them refer to a first one: substance. In the Categories, primary substance is the concrete individual — this man, this horse — that which is neither said of a subject nor in a subject; species and genera are secondary substances, and the other categories (quantity, quality, relation, place, time, position, state, action and affection) exist only in it. In the Metaphysics the question deepens: what makes something a substance? The central books (Z, H, Θ) examine four candidates — essence, the universal, the genus and the subject — and point to form as substance in the primary sense, because it is what makes a matter this determinate thing. The inquiry culminates in book Λ, where the highest substance is pure actuality without matter. That “what has always been sought” is substance turns metaphysics into a theory of individuals and of what makes them intelligible, against the Platonic separation of the Forms.

Aristotle's answer to the question about being raised by Parmenides and Plato; the basis of scholastic, Arabic and modern ontology.

Source: Shields, Christopher. «Aristotle». Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (revisión de 2020).

Matter and form, potentiality and actualityhilemorfismo
Every natural thing, for Aristotle, is a compound of matter (hyle) and form (morphe or eidos). Matter is what something is made of and what could be something else; form is what makes it what it is: the shape of the statue in the bronze, the organisation of a house in its bricks, life in a body. The distinction arose to explain change without falling into the Eleatic paradox: in all becoming something persists (the subject, the matter), something is lost (the privation) and something is acquired (the form). So book I of the Physics sets it out. The same scheme applies at different levels: the elements are matter for the tissues, the tissues for the organs, the organs for the living being. Matter never exists without some form, and the form of natural things does not exist apart from its matter. To this pair another is joined, set out in book Θ of the Metaphysics: potentiality (dynamis), the capacity to become, and actuality (energeia, entelecheia), its realisation; the seed is potentially a tree. Motion is “the actuality of what is potentially, as such” (Physics III 1), and actuality is prior to potentiality, because only what already is in act brings something else into act: hence the demand for a first principle that is pure actuality. With this double scheme Aristotle could think at once the unity and the transformation of beings; Thomas Aquinas made it the axis of his metaphysics.

A solution to the puzzles about change inherited from Parmenides; the basis of Aristotelian psychology and of the scholastic theory of the soul as the form of the body.

Source: Shields, Christopher. «Aristotle». Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (revisión de 2020).

The four causescuatro-causas
To know something, says Aristotle, is to know its why, and the why is said in four ways. The material cause is that out of which a thing is made (the bronze of the statue); the formal, its form or definition (the shape that makes it the statue of someone); the efficient, the source of change (the sculptor, or rather the sculptor's art); and the final, that for the sake of which it exists (to honour a god or a victor). He sets them out in Physics II 3 and in Metaphysics A, where he reviews earlier philosophy as a gradual discovery of these causes. The decisive point is that nature acts for an end: front teeth are sharp for cutting and molars broad for grinding, and that cannot be explained by chance. This teleology does not presuppose a conscious designer; the end is internal to living beings, which tend towards their mature form. Modern criticism, from Bacon to Spinoza, expelled final causes from physics, but biology still speaks of functions.

Physics II and Metaphysics A; the framework of natural science until the seventeenth century.

Source: Shields, Christopher. «Aristotle». Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (revisión de 2020).

The unmoved movermotor-inmovil
If everything that moves is moved by something else, and the series cannot be infinite, there must be a first mover that moves without being moved. Aristotle argues this in book VIII of the Physics and in book Λ of the Metaphysics. That principle must be eternal, because the circular motion of the heavens is eternal; it must be pure actuality, without potentiality or matter, since any potentiality might fail to be realised; and it moves not by pushing but as the beloved and the desired move: as a final cause. What activity belongs to it? The most excellent, thought, and the best object of thought, which is itself; hence it is “thinking of thinking”. On this principle, he says, depend the heavens and nature, and its life is like ours at its best moments, but continuous. It is not a creator and does not know the world; yet its description nourished for centuries the theology of the three religions of the book, from Avicenna and Maimonides to Thomas Aquinas.

The philosophical theology of Physics VIII and Metaphysics Λ; the point of contact between Greek philosophy and monotheistic theology.

Source: Shields, Christopher. «Aristotle». Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (revisión de 2020).

The soul as the form of the bodypsyche
In On the Soul, Aristotle defines the soul as “the first actuality of a natural organised body” that has life potentially. The soul is not a thing shut up in the body but what makes a body a living being: if the eye were an animal, sight would be its soul. Hence it makes no sense to ask whether soul and body are one, any more than to ask it of the wax and its shape. He distinguishes graded faculties: the nutritive, common to plants and animals; the sensitive, with desire and locomotion, proper to animals; and the intellective, exclusive to man. In book III he introduces an intellect that “makes all things”, separable, unaffected and immortal, as against another that “becomes all things”. Those few obscure lines provoked one of the longest debates in the history of philosophy: Alexander of Aphrodisias, Avicenna, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas argued over whether that agent intellect is divine, one for all humankind, or proper to each soul.

The psychology of On the Soul and the Parva naturalia; the origin of the medieval dispute over the agent intellect.

Source: Shields, Christopher. «Aristotle». Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (revisión de 2020).

Happiness (eudaimonia) and the contemplative lifeeudaimonia
Everyone calls the highest good happiness, the Nicomachean Ethics observes, but they disagree about what it is. Aristotle seeks it in the proper function of the human being: if what distinguishes us is reason, happiness will be an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue, and the most complete virtue, over a whole life. It is not a feeling or a state but an activity; one day is not enough, as one swallow does not make a spring; and it needs some good fortune and external goods, since it is hard to act well in poverty or solitude. Book X goes further: the highest activity is contemplation (theoria), the exercise of the intellect on what is most worth knowing. It is the most continuous, the most self-sufficient, the one loved for its own sake; whoever practises it lives by something divine within him. So we should not think mortal thoughts because we are mortal, but “make ourselves immortal” as far as we can. The practical life of ethical virtue is happy in a secondary degree.

The core of both Ethics; an inspiration for the contemplative ideal in later philosophy and mysticism.

Source: Shields, Christopher. «Aristotle». Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (revisión de 2020).

Virtue as a meantermino-medio
Ethical virtue, Aristotle explains in book II of the Nicomachean Ethics, is neither innate nor contrary to our nature: we acquire it by habit; by doing just acts we become just. It is a disposition to choose that consists in a mean relative to us, determined by reason as the prudent person would determine it. Courage lies between rashness and cowardice; liberality between prodigality and meanness; temperance between self-indulgence and insensibility. The mean is not an arithmetic average nor lukewarmness: it is to feel and act “at the right times, about the right things, towards the right people, for the right end and in the right way”, and in that sense it is an extreme of excellence. Some actions admit no mean, such as theft or murder. The virtue that guides choice is practical wisdom (phronesis), which is learned not from books but by experience. This ethics of character rather than of rules was revived in the twentieth century by Anscombe and MacIntyre.

Books II–VI of the Nicomachean Ethics; the basis of virtue ethics.

Source: Shields, Christopher. «Aristotle». Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (revisión de 2020).

Syllogism and logicsilogismo
Aristotle is the founder of formal logic. In the Prior Analytics he defines the syllogism as an argument in which, certain things being laid down, something other than them follows of necessity from their being so: if every man is an animal and every animal is mortal, every man is mortal. He studies systematically the combinations of universal and particular, affirmative and negative propositions in three figures, proves which are valid by reducing them to those of the first, and uses letters as variables for the first time. In the Posterior Analytics he applies the syllogism to demonstrative science, which starts from first principles that are true and indemonstrable, grasped by induction and intellect. The Topics deal with dialectical reasoning from accepted opinions, and the Sophistical Refutations with fallacious arguments. Kant could write that logic had taken no step forward or backward since Aristotle; only with Frege, at the end of the nineteenth century, was his system surpassed, and it remains a chapter of modern logic.

The Organon (“instrument”), the name the commentators gave to the logical treatises.

Source: Shields, Christopher. «Aristotle». Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (revisión de 2020).

Vidéos

Vidéos

Enregistrements, entretiens et documentaires. Les vidéos sont lues depuis YouTube ; elles ne sont pas hébergées ici.

  • Aristotle

    Conférence· EN· 2021· 44 min

    Gresham CollegeChaîne officielle

  • Aristotle's Lyceum - Edith Hall

    Conférence· EN· 2019· 49 min

    Gresham CollegeChaîne officielle

  • Armand Marie Leroi, "The Lagoon: how Aristotle invented science"

    Conférence· EN· 2018· 57 min

    British School at AthensChaîne officielle

  • 7. The Mixed Regime and the Rule of Law: Aristotle's Politics, I, III

    Conférence· EN· 2008· 44 min

    YaleCoursesChaîne officielle

  • 8. The Mixed Regime and the Rule of Law: Aristotle's Politics, IV

    Conférence· EN· 2008· 48 min

    YaleCoursesChaîne officielle

  • 9. The Mixed Regime and the Rule of Law: Aristotle's Politics, VII

    Conférence· EN· 2008· 46 min

    YaleCoursesChaîne officielle

  • Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 10: "THE GOOD CITIZEN"

    Conférence· EN· 2009· 55 min

    Harvard UniversityChaîne officielle

  • Edith Hall • Aristotle and the Future of the Human Race

    Conférence· EN· 2023· 81 min

    Wolf Humanities CenterChaîne officielle

  • Aristotle & Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38

    Analyse· EN· 2016· 9 min

    CrashCourseChaîne officielle

  • Aristóteles | Por Darío Sztajnszrajber

    Conférence· ES· 2016· 153 min

    Facultad LibreChaîne officielle

  • Mentira la verdad IV: Aristóteles, Metafísica - Canal Encuentro

    Documentaire· ES· 2016· 28 min

    Canal EncuentroChaîne officielle

  • 7ª - 8ª Introducción a la Filosofía de Aristóteles

    Conférence· ES· 2022· 157 min

    Fundación Universitaria EspañolaChaîne officielle

  • Aristóteles: el discípulo díscolo de Platón | Introduc. Seminario | Filosofía Clásica | Ginés Marco

    Conférence· ES· 2023· 72 min

    Ateneo Mercantil de ValenciaChaîne officielle

  • Aristóteles, Galeno y Avicena en la Escuela de Traductores de Toledo | Mariano Gómez Aranda

    Conférence· ES· 2023· 61 min

    Fundación Juan MarchChaîne officielle

  • Aristóteles, ¿el primer ecologista?

    Voir sur YouTube

    Cette vidéo ne peut pas être intégrée ; elle s'ouvre sur YouTube.

    Aristóteles, ¿el primer ecologista?

    Documentaire· ES· 2025· 25 min

    UNEDChaîne officielle

Galerie

Galerie

Images dont la licence a été vérifiée. Chacune conserve son auteur et son attribution.

Manuscrits

Manuscrits

Témoins manuscrits et textes anciens, avec leur dépositaire et leurs conditions de consultation.

  • GRC · Griego (minúscula) · s. IV a. C.

    Κατηγορίαι κ.ἄ. (Ὄργανον)

    Témoin conservé
    Códice fechado en el año 954
    Dépositaire
    Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Venecia · Gr. 201
    Numérisation
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aristotle,_Categ…
  • GRC · Griego (minúscula) · s. IV a. C.

    Τὰ μετὰ τὰ φυσικά

    Témoin conservé
    Códice copiado entre 1311 y 1321
    Dépositaire
    Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana · Vat. gr. 256
    Numérisation
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aristotle,_Metap…
  • GRC · Griego (minúscula) · s. IV a. C.

    Ἀριστοτέλους ἔργα (miscelánea)

    Témoin conservé
    Manuscrito de 1457 con miniatura de Aristóteles (fol. 8v)
    Dépositaire
    Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Viena · Cod. phil. gr. 64
    Numérisation
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aristotle,_Vienn…
  • GRC · Griego (cursiva sobre papiro) · c. 330–322 a. C.

    Ἀθηναίων πολιτεία

    Témoin conservé
    Papiro egipcio de finales del siglo I d. C., escrito en el reverso de unas cuentas agrícolas
    Dépositaire
    British Library, Londres · Papyrus 131
    Numérisation
    www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Papyr…
Manuscrits →

Relations

Relations

Influences, filiations et affinités. On distingue la relation documentée de la similitude identifiée par analyse.

  • Disciple de

    Plato

    He was Plato's student in the Academy for twenty years (c. 367–347 BCE) and his most influential critic: he rejected the separation of the Forms but kept the primacy of form and of knowledge of the universal.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Socrates

    He never met him (Socrates died in 399), but knew him through Plato and discusses him in the Metaphysics (A 6, M 4), crediting him with the search for universal definitions and inductive arguments, and in the Ethics, where he criticises his thesis that no one does wrong knowingly.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Parmenides

    Book I of the Physics answers the Eleatic denial of change with the notions of subject, privation and form, and of potentiality and actuality.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Heraclitus

    In Metaphysics Γ he argues against those who, following Heraclitus, seem to deny the principle of non-contradiction; in Parts of Animals I 5 he recalls with appreciation his saying “here too there are gods”.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Empedocles

    He discusses him often in the Physics, On the Soul and On Generation and Corruption; he criticises his explanation of living beings by chance combinations.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Pythagoras

    In Metaphysics A 5 he expounds and criticises the Pythagorean doctrine that the principles of numbers are the principles of all things; he also wrote a lost treatise on the Pythagoreans.

    Relation documentée

  • Contemporain de

    Diogenes of Sinope

    Diogenes Laertius (V 18) records an anecdotal encounter between the two over some dried figs; the episode's historicity is doubtful.

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    Plotinus

    Plotinus integrated Aristotelian concepts into his system — actuality and potentiality, the intellect thinking itself — and devoted treatises VI 1–3 of the Enneads to criticising the doctrine of the categories.

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    Augustine of Hippo

    In the Confessions (IV 16) he relates that he read and understood on his own, at about twenty, Aristotle's Categories in Latin translation, and that they did him little good in thinking about God.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Al-Ghazali

    The Incoherence of the Philosophers attacks the falasifa who followed Aristotle through al-Farabi and Avicenna, naming him explicitly as the source of their errors, although al-Ghazali accepted and spread Aristotelian logic.

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    Maimonides

    The Guide of the Perplexed relies on Aristotelian physics and metaphysics and holds that what Aristotle says about the sublunary world is true, while rejecting his thesis of the eternity of the world.

    Relation documentée

  • Idées proches de

    Ibn Arabi

    Indirect relation: Ibn Arabi knew the Aristotelian vocabulary (form, matter, intellect) through falsafa and transformed it in a mystical key; there is no record that he discussed Aristotle's texts.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

  • A influencé

    Meister Eckhart

    As a Dominican master at Paris, Eckhart worked within scholastic Aristotelianism and frequently cites On the Soul and the Metaphysics, particularly the doctrine of the intellect. A general relation, with no specific source recorded in this entry.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

  • En désaccord avec

    Baruch Spinoza

    The appendix to part one of Spinoza's Ethics rejects final causes, a pillar of Aristotelian physics, as an anthropomorphic prejudice.

    Relation documentée

  • Idées proches de

    Confucius

    A parallel often drawn by comparative philosophy: virtue as cultivated habit and the Aristotelian mean are compared with the Confucian doctrine of the mean. There was no historical contact.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

  • Idées proches de

    Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha

    A thematic parallel: the ethics of the mean and the Buddhist “middle way” between asceticism and pleasure; the underlying conceptions are very different and there was no contact.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

  • Contemporain de

    Epicurus

    Epicurus (b. 341 BCE) belongs to the following generation; his atomist physics and his ethics of pleasure developed in polemic with the Platonic and Peripatetic tradition.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

Sources

Sources

Bibliographie et catalogues consultés pour cette fiche.

  1. Cicerón. Académicos II (Lúculo), 119: «veniet flumen orationis aureum fundens Aristoteles».
  2. Wikimedia Commons: metadatos y licencias de las imágenes, verificados por la API imageinfo el 25 de octubre de 2026.
  3. YouTube: verificación de cada vídeo mediante el servicio oEmbed, 25 de octubre de 2026.
  4. Diógenes Laercio. Vidas de los filósofos ilustres, libro V, 1–35 («Aristóteles»). Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vol. I, Loeb Classical Library 184. Londres: Heinemann, 1925 (texto en Wikisource).
  5. Shields, Christopher. «Aristotle». Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (revisión de 2020).
  6. «Aristotle», Wikipedia en inglés, y «Aristóteles», Wikipedia en español (consultadas para hechos verificables y bibliografía; texto propio).
  7. Natali, Carlo. Aristotle: His Life and School. Ed. D. S. Hutchinson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
  8. Düring, Ingemar. Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1957.
  9. Barnes, Jonathan (ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press (Bollingen Series LXXI.2), 1984.
  10. Plutarco. Vida de Alejandro, 7–8. Trad. inglesa de Bernadotte Perrin, Plutarch's Lives, vol. VII, Loeb Classical Library 99. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1919.
  11. Estrabón. Geografía XIII, 1, 54; y Plutarco, Vida de Sila, 26 (sobre la biblioteca de Aristóteles y Teofrasto, Neleo de Escepsis, Apelicón y Andrónico de Rodas).
  12. Wikidata, «Aristotle» (Q868).
  13. Bekker, Immanuel (ed.). Aristotelis Opera, edidit Academia Regia Borussica. 5 vols. Berlín: G. Reimer, 1831–1870 (vols. I–II, texto griego, 1831).
  14. Open Library (Internet Archive): registros de edición e ISBN de la Biblioteca Clásica Gredos, la Loeb Classical Library (Harvard University Press) y Princeton University Press consultados el 25 de octubre de 2026.
  15. Eliano. Historias curiosas (Varia historia) III, 36; Aulo Gelio. Noches áticas XIII, 5 y XX, 5.
  16. Jaeger, Werner. Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. Berlín: Weidmann, 1923 (trad. esp.: Aristóteles. Bases para la historia de su desarrollo intelectual. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1946).
  17. Leroi, Armand Marie. The Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented Science. Londres: Bloomsbury, 2014.
  18. Kenyon, Frederic G. (ed.). Aristotle on the Constitution of Athens. Londres: British Museum, 1891 (editio princeps del Papiro 131 de la British Library).
  19. Project Gutenberg (catálogo vía Gutendex) e Internet Classics Archive del MIT (traducciones de Oxford y otras), consultados el 25 de octubre de 2026.
  20. Azcárate, Patricio de (trad.). Obras de Aristóteles. 10 vols. Madrid: Medina y Navarro, 1873–1875 (digitalización parcial en el Proyecto Filosofía en español y facsímiles completos en Wikimedia Commons).
  21. Darwin, Charles. Carta a William Ogle, 22 de febrero de 1882. Darwin Correspondence Project, DCP-LETT-13697.
  22. Moraux, Paul. Les listes anciennes des ouvrages d'Aristote. Lovaina: Éditions Universitaires, 1951.
  23. Kraye, Jill; Ryan, W. F.; Schmitt, C. B. (eds.). Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages: The Theology and Other Texts. Londres: The Warburg Institute, 1986.
  24. Rose, Valentin (ed.). Aristotelis qui ferebantur librorum fragmenta. Leipzig: Teubner, 1886; y Gigon, Olof (ed.). Aristotelis Opera III: Librorum deperditorum fragmenta. Berlín: De Gruyter, 1987.
  25. Hutchinson, D. S.; Johnson, Monte Ransome. «Authenticating Aristotle's Protrepticus». Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29 (2005): 193–294.
  26. Maimónides. Guía de perplejos II, 22 (trad. inglesa de Shlomo Pines, The Guide of the Perplexed, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963); y carta a Samuel ibn Tibón (1199) sobre los libros de Aristóteles.
  27. al-Ghazali. Tahafut al-falasifa (La incoherencia de los filósofos), introducción. Trad. inglesa de Michael E. Marmura, The Incoherence of the Philosophers. Provo: Brigham Young University Press, 2000.
  28. Agustín de Hipona. Confesiones IV, 16, 28–29 (lectura de las Categorías de Aristóteles hacia los veinte años).
  29. Plotino. Enéadas VI, 1–3 («Sobre los géneros del ser»), con la crítica de las categorías aristotélicas. Trad. inglesa de A. H. Armstrong, Loeb Classical Library 445. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1988.
  30. Spinoza, Baruch. Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata (1677), parte I, apéndice (crítica de las causas finales).
  31. Wikiquote en inglés, «Aristotle», secciones «Disputed» y «Misattributed» (atribuciones dudosas y falsas, con sus fuentes).
Ayant droit
Los textos griegos de Aristóteles son de dominio público. Las traducciones y ediciones modernas pertenecen a sus traductores y editoriales: Editorial Gredos (Biblioteca Clásica Gredos, hoy en RBA Libros), Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), Princeton University Press (The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes), Oxford University Press (Oxford Classical Texts y Clarendon Aristotle Series), Alianza Editorial, Abada y otras.

En attente de confirmation

Ce que cette fiche n'a pas encore pu établir. Nous préférons le dire plutôt que de combler.

  • Ediciones en español con ISBN no localizadas en catálogo para los opúsculos espurios Sobre el mundo, Sobre el aliento, Sobre los colores, Sobre las cosas audibles, Sobre las plantas, Relatos maravillosos, Situación y nombres de los vientos y Sobre Meliso, Jenófanes y Gorgias, ni para la Teología de Aristóteles; tampoco ediciones inglesas con ISBN del Libro de las causas y del Secreto de los secretos.
  • ISBN de la Política en la Biblioteca Clásica Gredos n.º 116 (1988) no visto en Open Library: se ha registrado la reedición de Gredos de 2022 con la misma traducción. Falta también el ISBN de History of Animals VII–X (Loeb 439, Balme).
  • Los años de primera edición de los volúmenes Loeb y de la Biblioteca Clásica Gredos proceden de la bibliografía general; los ISBN corresponden a las reimpresiones registradas en Open Library. Confirmar con los catálogos de las editoriales.
  • Gredos 2020, «Poética. Magna Moralia» (ISBN 9788424939151): confirmar qué traductor firma cada obra (el registro cita a Teresa Martínez Manzano y Leonardo Martínez Dupla).
  • Tomo V de las Obras de Aristóteles de Azcárate («Psicología: Opúsculos»): confirmar qué tratados de los Parva naturalia contiene antes de enlazarlo a cada uno por separado; hoy solo se enlaza a Acerca del sentido y lo sensible.
  • Derechos de las traducciones de Oxford en la UE: verificar las fechas de muerte de A. J. Jenkinson, W. A. Pickard-Cambridge, R. P. Hardie, E. W. Webster, G. R. T. Ross y J. Solomon. En EE. UU. todas son de dominio público por ser anteriores a 1931, salvo la de Acerca del alma de J. A. Smith (1931), que lo será el 1 de enero de 2027.
  • Traductor de la Ética nicomáquea de Project Gutenberg n.º 8438 (edición Everyman de 1911): el ebook no lo nombra; identificarlo en la edición impresa.
  • Catálogo antiguo de obras (Diógenes Laercio V 22–27, unos ciento cincuenta títulos, y las listas de Hesiquio y de Ptolomeo el Árabe estudiadas por Moraux): se han registrado las obras perdidas principales y mejor documentadas, no todos los títulos de la lista.
  • Manuscritos: añadir el Parisinus graecus 1741 (Poética y Retórica, s. X), el Vindobonensis phil. gr. 100 (s. IX, Física, Del cielo, Metafísica) y el Parisinus gr. 1853 (s. X) con sus digitalizaciones oficiales (Gallica, ÖNB), no verificadas en esta pasada; tampoco se ha verificado la digitalización íntegra del Vat. gr. 256 en DigiVatLib.
  • Wikidata registra como fecha de muerte el 7 de marzo del 322 a. C. sin fuente primaria localizada; se mantiene solo el año.
  • Vídeos: el programa de la UNED «Aristóteles, ¿el primer ecologista?» no permite inserción (oEmbed 401). No se ha encontrado un documental de televisión pública española dedicado íntegramente a Aristóteles en un canal oficial.
  • Imagen descartada: «Stagira, an ancient Greek city, birth place of Aristotle.jpg» (CC BY-SA 4.0) por metadatos de fecha anómalos (2026-06-16); revisar antes de usarla. No hay retrato de Aristóteles anterior a la copia romana del tipo de Lisipo.
  • Sin programa de afiliación verificado ni web oficial: Aristóteles no tiene titular de derechos; las editoriales citadas no se han comprobado como programas de afiliados.

Recherche effectuée le 2026-10-25