Aller au contenu
The ConsciousLibrary

Stoïcisme

Zeno of Citium

Ζήνων ὁ Κιτιεύς

v. 334 av. J.-C. – v. 262 av. J.-C.Personne historiquement documentée

Philosophe grec né à Kition, à Chypre (v. 334-262 av. J.-C.), fondateur du stoïcisme. Marchand arrivé à Athènes après un naufrage, il se forma auprès du cynique Cratès, des mégariques et des académiciens, et vers 300 av. J.-C. commença à enseigner sous la Stoa Poikilè, le portique peint qui donna son nom à l'école. Il définit la fin de la vie comme le fait de vivre en accord et divisa la philosophie en logique, physique et éthique. Son œuvre, à commencer par la République, est perdue : nous la connaissons par des fragments et des témoignages.

œuvres
28œuvres
éditions
24éditions
citations
10citations
vidéos
10vidéos
images
5images
Busto de Zenón de Citio (colección Farnese, Nápoles)

Busto de Zenón de Citio (colección Farnese, Nápoles) · CC BY-SA 4.0

Dans ses propres mots

«I made a prosperous voyage when I suffered shipwreck.»

Diógenes Laercio VII 4; Laercio advierte que otros sitúan el dicho en la época en que seguía a Crates. Griego: Diógenes Laercio VII, ed. de Wikisource griega; inglés: R. D. Hicks (Loeb, 1925, dominio público); español: traducción propia.

Republic (Politeia) — Zeno of Citium

Pour commencer, une œuvre

Republic (Politeia)

Son idée centrale

Living in agreement (homologia): The end (*telos*) of human life, according to Zeno, is "living in agreement".

Biographie

5 min de lecture

Traduction assistée à partir de l'original espagnol, en attente de relecture par un traducteur natif.

Un fondateur sans livres

Zénon de Kition fonda l'une des écoles les plus influentes de l'Antiquité, et nous ne conservons pas une seule page de lui. Ses livres, plus d'une vingtaine, se sont perdus, en partie, peut-on supposer, parce que les traités de son troisième successeur, Chrysippe, les rendirent superflus pour l'école elle-même. Ce que nous savons provient du livre VII des Vies de Diogène Laërce, qui réunit des anecdotes, un décret athénien et la liste de ses œuvres, et de centaines de citations et de paraphrases chez Cicéron, Plutarque, Stobée, Sextus Empiricus ou Athénée, rassemblées en 1905 par Hans von Arnim dans le premier volume des Stoicorum veterum fragmenta. Souvent ces sources parlent des « stoïciens » sans distinguer le fondateur de ses disciples, et isoler ce qui lui revient est une tâche délicate.

Le marchand de Kition

Il naquit vers 334 av. J.-C. à Kition, sur la côte sud de Chypre, cité grecque à forte population phénicienne ; ses adversaires l'appelaient « le Phénicien », et lui ne cacha jamais son origine. Il était le fils de Mnaséas, un négociant qui, selon Démétrios de Magnésie, lui rapportait d'Athènes des livres socratiques quand il était enfant. Laërce le décrit maigre, grand, basané, le cou de travers, amateur de figues vertes et de soleil. Vers 312, à quelque vingt-deux ans selon son disciple Persaios, il fit naufrage avec une cargaison de pourpre près du Pirée. Il monta à Athènes, s'assit dans une librairie et lut le deuxième livre des Mémorables de Xénophon ; il demanda où l'on pouvait trouver des hommes comme Socrate, et le libraire lui désigna Cratès le cynique, qui passait par là : « Suis-le. »

Apprentissage : le chien, Mégare et l'Académie

Auprès de Cratès, il apprit l'indifférence aux conventions, bien qu'il fût, raconte Laërce, trop pudique pour l'impudence cynique : le maître lui fit porter une marmite de lentilles à travers le Céramique et, comme Zénon tentait de la cacher, la lui brisa d'un coup de bâton. Il fréquenta ensuite Stilpon de Mégare, Diodore Cronos et Polémon, le scholarque de l'Académie, qui lui reprochait d'entrer par la porte du jardin pour lui voler ses doctrines et les habiller à la phénicienne. Des années plus tard, il dirait qu'il avait fait bonne traversée le jour où il fit naufrage. De cette formation multiple naquit un système propre : l'éthique cynique de l'autosuffisance et de la vertu, la dialectique mégarique et l'héritage socratique et platonicien.

La République « sur la queue du chien »

Encore disciple de Cratès, il écrivit son œuvre la plus fameuse, la République, et certains disaient en plaisantant qu'il l'avait écrite « sur la queue du chien ». C'était une réponse à Platon et un prolongement de Diogène de Sinope : une communauté de sages, seuls vrais citoyens, amis et libres, sans temples, tribunaux ni gymnases, sans monnaie, avec la communauté des femmes et le même vêtement pour les hommes et les femmes. Plutarque résuma son idéal : que nous ne vivions pas divisés en cités et en dèmes ayant chacun leurs lois, mais que nous tenions tous les hommes pour concitoyens, comme un troupeau qui paît sous une loi commune. Ses successeurs eurent parfois honte du livre ; Chrysippe le défendit comme authentique, et un bibliothécaire de Pergame alla jusqu'à retrancher de ses œuvres les passages gênants.

Le portique peint

Vers 300 av. J.-C., il commença à enseigner en se promenant sous la Stoa Poikilè, le portique de l'agora décoré par Polygnote, où, au temps des Trente, mille quatre cents citoyens avaient été mis à mort. Les gens venaient l'y écouter, et ses partisans, appelés d'abord zénoniens, furent ensuite nommés stoïciens, « ceux du portique ». Il parlait avec brièveté et âpreté, fuyait les foules et vivait avec une frugalité proverbiale : du pain, du miel, un peu de vin, un manteau léger ; « plus tempérant que Zénon le philosophe », disait-on à Athènes, et les poètes comiques raillaient une philosophie qui enseignait à avoir faim. Antigone Gonatas, roi de Macédoine, assistait à ses leçons quand il séjournait à Athènes et l'invita à sa cour ; Zénon, déjà âgé, lui envoya ses disciples Persaios et Philonidès.

Logique, physique et éthique

Zénon fut le premier, selon Laërce, à diviser la philosophie en logique, physique et éthique. Il définit la fin de la vie comme « vivre en accord », c'est-à-dire conformément à une raison cohérente ; Cléanthe, son successeur, aurait ajouté « avec la nature », bien que d'autres sources attribuent déjà la formule complète à Zénon. Il introduisit le terme kathêkon, le convenable ou le dû, et définit la passion comme un mouvement irrationnel de l'âme, une impulsion excessive, rangée sous quatre genres : peine, crainte, désir et plaisir. En physique, le monde est un être vivant et rationnel, formé d'un principe actif, le logos ou dieu, et d'un principe passif, la matière ; l'âme est un souffle chaud. Cicéron conserve le geste par lequel il expliquait la connaissance : la main ouverte était la représentation, les doigts un peu repliés l'assentiment, le poing fermé la compréhension, et le poing serré dans l'autre main la science, que seul possède le sage.

Une mort stoïcienne

Il mourut vers 262 av. J.-C. Selon Laërce, en sortant de l'école il trébucha et se brisa un orteil ; il frappa la terre de la main, cita un vers de la Niobé de Timothée — « Je viens ; pourquoi m'appelles-tu ? » — et mourut sur-le-champ en retenant son souffle. Une autre version dit qu'il cessa de s'alimenter. Persaios lui donnait soixante-douze ans ; d'autres sources, quatre-vingt-dix-huit. Les Athéniens, qui lui avaient confié les clés des remparts, votèrent de le couronner d'une couronne d'or et de l'ensevelir aux frais de la cité au Céramique, parce qu'il avait exhorté les jeunes gens à la vertu et que sa vie avait été l'exemple de ce qu'il enseignait. Antigone dit, en l'apprenant, qu'il avait perdu son public.

L'héritage du Portique

Lui succédèrent Cléanthe d'Assos puis Chrysippe de Soles, qui fit de ses intuitions un système si complet que l'école cessa de lire le fondateur. Le Portique traversa cinq siècles, passa à Rome avec Panétius et Posidonius et culmina chez Sénèque, Épictète et Marc Aurèle ; Épictète proposait de se demander, devant n'importe quel puissant, ce qu'auraient fait Socrate ou Zénon. Son idée d'une loi et d'une citoyenneté communes à tous les êtres raisonnables nourrit le droit naturel et le cosmopolitisme modernes. À Larnaca, l'antique Kition, la ville honore aujourd'hui son fils le plus célèbre.

Sources: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342). · Diógenes Laercio. Los diez libros de Diógenes Laercio sobre las vidas, opiniones y sentencias de los filósofos más ilustres, trad. de José Ortiz y Sanz, tomo II (libros VI–X). Imprenta Real, Madrid, 1792 (Internet Archive). · Arnim, Hans von (ed.). Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, vol. I: Zeno et Zenonis discipuli. Teubner, Leipzig, 1905 (Internet Archive). · Pearson, Alfred C. (ed.). The Fragments of Zeno and Cleanthes, with Introduction and Explanatory Notes. C. J. Clay, Londres, 1891 (Internet Archive). · Cappelletti, Ángel J. (introd., trad. y notas). Los estoicos antiguos: Zenón, Aristón, Apolófanes, Herilo, Dionisio de Heraclea, Perseo, Cleantes, Esfero. Gredos (Biblioteca Clásica Gredos, 230), Madrid, 1996.

Chronologie

La vie, année après année

Chaque point est un événement documenté. Cliquez pour le lire, avec sa source et son degré de certitude.

  1. v. 334 av. J.-C. · 0 ans

    Birth

    Born at Citium, son of Mnaseas (or Demeas). The date is inferred from Persaeus' chronology (arrival in Athens at 22, death at 72) and the Athenian decree of the archonship of Arrhenides (262/261 BCE). Wikidata records 334. Years BCE are expressed as negative numbers.

    Probable

  2. v. 312 av. J.-C. · 22 ans

    Shipwreck and meeting with Crates

    He is shipwrecked with a cargo of purple near Piraeus, reads Xenophon's Memorabilia in an Athenian bookshop and becomes a pupil of Crates the Cynic (Diogenes Laertius VII 2–3). Laertius also gives the age of thirty.

    Tradition

  3. v. 310 av. J.-C.

    The Republic

    While still a pupil of Crates he writes the Republic, inspired by that of Diogenes of Sinope; it was jokingly said that he had written it "on the dog's tail" (Diogenes Laertius VII 4).

    Probable

  4. v. 305 av. J.-C.

    With Stilpo, Diodorus and Polemo

    He leaves Crates and studies with the Megarian Stilpo, the dialectician Diodorus Cronus and Polemo, head of the Academy; according to Laertius, for some twenty years (VII 2, 4, 16, 25).

    Probable

  5. v. 300 av. J.-C.

    Begins teaching in the Painted Stoa

    He begins teaching in the Stoa Poikile in the agora; his followers, first called Zenonians, come to be called Stoics (Diogenes Laertius VII 5).

    Probable

  6. v. 276 av. J.-C.

    Antigonus Gonatas' invitation

    Antigonus Gonatas, king of Macedon from 277/276, who attended his lectures, invites him to his court; Zeno sends Persaeus and Philonides. Laertius copies the exchange of letters, of disputed authenticity (VII 6–9).

    Probable

  7. v. 262 av. J.-C. · 72 ans

    Death and public honours

    He dies after tripping as he left the school (Diogenes Laertius VII 28). An Athenian decree of the archonship of Arrhenides grants him a golden crown and a tomb in the Ceramicus at public expense (VII 10–12).

    Probable

  8. v. 262 av. J.-C.

    Cleanthes, second scholarch

    Cleanthes of Assos succeeds him at the head of the school; Zeno compared him to hard wax tablets, hard to write on but retaining what is written (Diogenes Laertius VII 37).

    Documenté

  9. v. 230 av. J.-C.

    Chrysippus heads the Stoa

    Chrysippus of Soli heads the school around 230–206 BCE and systematises the doctrine; his treatises displace Zeno's.

    Documenté

  10. v. 50 av. J.-C.

    Philodemus, On the Stoics

    Philodemus of Gadara discusses the Republics of Zeno and Diogenes and the Stoic attempts to disown them (PHerc. 155 and 339).

    Documenté

  11. 1891

    Pearson edits the fragments

    Alfred C. Pearson publishes The Fragments of Zeno and Cleanthes, the first annotated edition of Zeno's fragments.

    Documenté

  12. 1905

    Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, vol. I

    Hans von Arnim collects in the first volume of the SVF the fragments and testimonies of Zeno and his immediate pupils; its numbering remains the standard reference.

    Documenté

Œuvres

Œuvres essentielles

Les œuvres sans lesquelles on ne comprend pas son héritage.

Republic (Politeia) — Zeno of Citium

Œuvre écrite · v. 310 av. J.-C.

Republic (Politeia)

Πολιτεία

Zeno's most famous work, written in his youth while he still followed Crates. According to the critics cited by Diogenes Laertius (VII 32–33), it declared ordinary education useless, called those who are not virtuous enemies and strangers to one another and reserved for the good the status of citizens, friends and free men; it established community of wives, forbade building temples, law courts and gymnasia, dispensed with coinage and ordered men and women to dress alike. Plutarch sums it up as the project of a single way of life and a single order for all men, like a herd under a common law. It is the founding text of Stoic cosmopolitanism.

5 éditions · amazon.com

On Impulse, or On Human Nature — Zeno of Citium

Œuvre écrite

On Impulse, or On Human Nature

Περὶ ὁρμῆς ἢ περὶ ἀνθρώπου φύσεως

In this treatise, according to Diogenes Laertius (VII 87), Zeno was the first to designate as the end of life "living in agreement with nature", which amounts to living according to virtue, since nature leads us to it. The double title indicates that the work studied impulse (horme), the tendency that moves animals and that in man should be governed by reason. Other sources (Stobaeus) credit Zeno with the short formula "living in agreement" and Cleanthes with the addition "with nature"; the contradiction between the two testimonies is still debated.

Non disponible Voir le livre

4 éditions

Fragments and testimonies — Zeno of Citium

Compilation postérieure · 1905

Fragments and testimonies

Ζήνωνος ἀποσπάσματα (SVF I 1–332)

The only form in which Zeno can be read today. It comprises the life and sayings in Diogenes Laertius VII 1–38—the shipwreck, the pot of lentils, "a friend is another self", "we have two ears and one mouth to listen more and speak less"—the doctrines the sources expressly attribute to him in logic (comprehension illustrated with the hand), physics (the two principles, fire, the soul as warm breath) and ethics (the end, the appropriate, the passions), and the testimonies on his Republic. Von Arnim's edition numbers 332 fragments of Zeno.

11 éditions · amazon.com

Toute son œuvre (28)

Voir ses 28 œuvres dans la bibliothèque

Citations

Citations localisées dans une œuvre précise. Chacune porte sa provenance et son degré de fiabilité.

I made a prosperous voyage when I suffered shipwreck.

Νῦν εὐπλόηκα, ὅτε νεναυάγηκα.

ProbableDiógenes Laercio VII 4; Laercio advierte que otros sitúan el dicho en la época en que seguía a Crates. Griego: Diógenes Laercio VII, ed. de Wikisource griega; inglés: R. D. Hicks (Loeb, 1925, dominio público); español: traducción propia.

1 / 10
Citations apocryphes ou d'attribution contestée (2)
  • «Man conquers the world by conquering himself.»

    It circulates online attributed to Zeno of Citium without any reference. It does not appear in Diogenes Laertius nor in the fragments collected by Pearson and von Arnim.

  • «We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.»

    A modern, arithmetical version of the saying genuinely transmitted by Diogenes Laertius (VII 23), which says only "that we may listen more and talk less". The "twice as much" form is not in the ancient text.

Dernières paroles

Versions contradictoires

«"I come, I come, why dost thou call for me?"»

Ἔρχομαι· τί μ' αὔεις;

Diogenes Laertius VII 28: leaving the school he tripped and broke a toe; striking the ground with his hand, he recited this line from the poet Timotheus' Niobe, addressed to the earth or to death, and died on the spot by holding his breath. At VII 31 Laertius himself records the variant "I come of my own accord; why then call me?" and another tradition according to which he died by ceasing to eat, with no final words. English: R. D. Hicks; Spanish: own translation.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

Interroger

Ce que répond son œuvre

Douze grandes questions de l'humanité et ce que ses textes permettent d'y répondre, références à l'appui. Nous ne lui prêtons jamais de paroles.

  • Qu'est-ce que l'Absolu ? Dieu existe-t-il ?

    God is the reason pervading matter, and its substance is the whole cosmos

    Un Absolu impersonnelIl le dit expressément

    Only testimonies and fragments of Zeno survive, but they already contain the core of Stoic theology. According to Diogenes Laertius, Zeno distinguished two principles of the whole, a passive one, unqualified matter, and an active one, the reason in it, which is god; and he held that the substance of god is the whole cosmos and the heaven. God is thus immanent, corporeal in the Stoic sense, craftsman and seminal reason of all that exists, and may be given the names of Zeus or of fate. It is not a separate being creating from outside but the rational order of the world, conceived as a craftsmanlike fire proceeding methodically towards generation.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qui suis-je ? Existe-t-il un vrai soi ?

    A soul of warm breath, citizen of a single human community

    Un soi cultivé dans la relationCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    For Zeno, according to the testimonies, the soul is a warm, corporeal breath that holds the living being together and has a ruling part where impression, assent and impulse reside. The human end is to live in agreement with nature, which is to live according to virtue, and that nature is rational and therefore common. His Republic, known from Plutarch's summary, drew the political consequence: not to live apart in cities with their own laws, but to regard all humans as fellow citizens under a single law. The Stoic self is not an isolated substance: it discovers itself in its kinship with the other rational beings.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi souffrons-nous ?

    Passion is an excessive impulse, against right reason and nature

    Le désordre social et moralIl le dit expressément

    According to the testimonies, Zeno defined passion as an irrational movement of the soul contrary to nature, or an excessive impulse. The four basic passions — desire, fear, pleasure and distress — are not blows from outside: they arise from hasty judgements about what is good or bad, to which the soul gives its assent. Since the human end is to live in agreement with nature, which is to live according to virtue, suffering appears when impulse overflows rational measure. The anecdote of the shipwreck that led him to philosophy sums up the other side: a setback is no evil if reason is in order.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Que se passe-t-il après la mort ?

    The soul is corporeal and not eternal: it lasts a while and dissolves

    Silence ou réserveCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    The testimonies about Zeno are scarce on this point. According to Diogenes Laertius, for him the soul is warm breath, that is, a body, and the Stoic school held that it survives death, but not for ever. The known variants belong to his successors: Cleanthes thought all souls last until the conflagration that closes each cosmic cycle, and Chrysippus, only those of the wise. No source attributes to Zeno a description of the beyond or a personal reward. The ethics he founded rests not on what is to come but on living now in agreement with nature; death is an indifferent, neither good nor bad.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Comment atteint-on la libération ou le salut ?

    To live in agreement with nature, which is to live by virtue

    Par la vertu et l'harmonieIl le dit expressément

    Diogenes Laertius attributes to Zeno the formula that defined Stoicism: the end is to live in agreement with nature, which amounts to living according to virtue, since nature leads us to it. Virtue suffices for happiness, and all else — health, wealth, fame, even life — is indifferent. The sage, who possesses virtue, is free, a king and happy even in chains. There is no leap and no grace: the good is reached little by little, says a saying Laertius attributes to him, but it is no little thing. Zeno's own conversion, who came to philosophy after a shipwreck, became an example of that slow transformation.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Faut-il un maître ?

    He learned from several masters and founded a school open in a portico

    Utile mais pas indispensableCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    According to Diogenes Laertius, Zeno reached Athens after a shipwreck, read Xenophon in a bookshop and asked where he could find men like Socrates; the bookseller pointed to Crates, who was passing by, and he became his disciple. Afterwards he studied with Stilpo, Polemo and the dialectician Diodorus, some twenty years in all, and only then founded his own school in the Painted Portico, a public place. The path shows the teacher as a guide, not as the exclusive holder of truth: Zeno took from each what seemed right to him. His doctrine places the weight on each person's reason, which the sage embodies perfectly.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Le monde est-il réel ?

    The cosmos is god's body, a craftsmanlike fire that generates all

    Manifestation du divinIl le dit expressément

    For Zeno, according to the testimonies, the world is real and corporeal, and penetrated through and through by divine reason. God is the active principle acting in matter, and his substance is the whole cosmos and the heaven; nature is a craftsmanlike fire proceeding methodically towards generation. This rational cosmos is a living being, ensouled and intelligent, and periodically resolves into fire in a conflagration from which the same order is born again. There is no distance between the divine and the world: the world is the divine visible and at work, and each thing bears a seminal reason within it. To understand it is to understand fate.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qu'est-ce que l'amour ?

    Eros is the god of friendship and of the city's concord

    Une bienveillance ordonnéeCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    Only scattered reports about love survive from Zeno, but they are significant. Athenaeus relates that, in his Republic, he presented Eros as the god of friendship and freedom, and also as the author of the city's concord. The Stoic definition of love transmitted by Diogenes Laertius — an impulse to form a friendship aroused by visible beauty — points the same way: the sage's love seeks not the union of bodies but friendship. Asked what a friend is, Zeno replied: “Another self.” His ideal of a single human community under a common law extends that bond to all humans, though with an order marked by reason.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Sommes-nous libres ou tout est-il déterminé ?

    “It was fated that I should steal.” “And that you should be flogged”

    Le destin et la responsabilitéIl le dit expressément

    The Stoics held that everything happens according to fate, a chain of causes coinciding with the divine reason governing the cosmos, and Diogenes Laertius' report already places Zeno in that line. But they did not therefore exempt humans from responsibility. The best-known anecdote sums it up: to a slave caught stealing, who claimed it was fated that he should steal, Zeno replied that it was also fated that he should be flogged. Fate is no excuse: the assent we give to our impressions is our own work, and we answer for it. The formula attributed to the school — fate leads the willing and drags the unwilling — expresses that reconciliation.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi méditer ou prier ?

    His Republic would have no temples; no testimony of his practice remains

    Ne s'est pas prononcé

    No teaching of Zeno on prayer or meditation survives, nor any report of how he practised them. The only thing the sources transmit is a controversial thesis of his Republic: in the ideal city no temples should be built, because it is not fitting to hold sacred a work of builders and craftsmen, which is worth little. Plutarch records it to reproach the Stoics for inconsistency, since they attended the rites. The thesis suggests that the sacred lies in reason rather than in buildings, but it is not enough to attribute a doctrine of prayer to him. The spiritual exercises now associated with Stoicism belong to later authors.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • La raison peut-elle connaître l'ultime ?

    From assent to knowledge: the sage's clenched fist

    L'étude et le savoirIl le dit expressément

    Zeno founded the Stoic theory of knowledge, according to which reason can grasp reality with certainty. Cicero relates how he explained it with a gesture: the open hand with fingers outstretched was impression; the fingers slightly bent, assent; the closed fist, comprehension; and the fist gripped by the other hand, knowledge, which only the sage possesses. There are “cognitive” impressions that cannot be false, and on them a firm knowledge is built. Since the cosmos is governed by reason, human reason can know its order. That knowledge is reached through long study of logic, physics and ethics, which the school taught as a whole.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Se retirer du monde ou le transformer ?

    A single human community under a common law, like a herd grazing together

    Ordonner la sociétéIl le dit expressément

    Zeno's Republic, written according to tradition while he still followed Crates, was a political manifesto. Plutarch summarises it thus: that we should not live apart in cities and villages, each with its own laws, but regard all humans as fellow citizens, and that there be one life and one order, like a herd grazing together under a common law. Other testimonies add provocative traits: no temples, no law courts, no coinage, community of wives among the wise. More than a programme of immediate government, it is the image of a just order founded on shared reason. The later Stoic school held that the sage takes part in politics if nothing prevents him.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres

Anecdotes et récits

Anecdotes et récits

Tradition oralec. 312 a. C.

The shipwreck and the bookshop

Zeno was coming from Phoenicia with a cargo of purple when he was shipwrecked near Piraeus. He went up to Athens and, at about thirty, sat down in a bookseller's shop, where he began reading the second book of Xenophon's Memorabilia, devoted to Socrates. He liked it so much that he asked where men like that could be found. At that moment Crates the Cynic was passing, and the bookseller pointed to him: "Follow that man." From that day he was his pupil. Years later he summed up the story by saying that he had made a good voyage when he was shipwrecked. Laertius records other versions: that he learned of the shipwreck while already in Athens and thanked fortune for driving him to philosophy, or that he sold the cargo before turning to it. Demetrius of Magnesia added that his father, a merchant, brought him Socratic books from Athens as a boy.

Origine du récit: Diogenes Laertius VII 2–5 and 31–32, with several contradictory versions (Hecato, Apollonius of Tyre, Demetrius of Magnesia). The story has the shape of an exemplary conversion and was probably embellished in the school; Zeno's mercantile background and his arrival in Athens with Crates are, by contrast, plausible.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

Tradition oralec. 312–310 a. C.

The pot of lentil soup

Zeno had, Laertius says, a great aptitude for philosophy but too much natural modesty for Cynic shamelessness. Crates wanted to cure him of this defect: he gave him a pot of lentil soup to carry through the Ceramicus, the busiest quarter of Athens. When he saw that Zeno was ashamed and tried to hide it, he broke the pot with a blow of his staff. Zeno ran off with the lentil soup streaming down his legs, and Crates called after him: "Why run away, my little Phoenician? Nothing terrible has befallen you." The scene sums up Zeno's debt to and distance from Cynicism: he learned indifference to others' opinion, but never adopted scandal as a method.

Origine du récit: Diogenes Laertius VII 3, with no named source. It is a chreia of school tradition; it reflects the relationship between Cynicism and Stoicism well, but cannot be taken as verified fact.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

Témoignagec. 300–262 a. C.

Zeno's hand

To explain how we know, Zeno used a gesture. He stretched out his hand with the fingers open and the palm showing: such is presentation, the impression we receive of things. He bent his fingers a little: such is the assent we give to it. He closed his fist completely: such is comprehension (katalepsis), a word he himself coined from this simile, because the mind "grasps" the object. Finally he brought up his left hand and gripped the right fist tightly: that was knowledge, which only the sage possesses. Cicero, who tells the scene in his Academica, uses it to show how demanding the Stoic theory of knowledge was: according to Zeno, no one but the sage knows anything with certainty.

Origine du récit: Cicero, Academica II (Lucullus) 145, voiced by the Academic Cicero criticising Zeno and Antiochus; a report transmitted more than two centuries later, but consistent with the terminology other sources attribute to Zeno (katalepsis, phantasia kataleptike).

Source: Cicerón. Académicos II (Lúculo) 145, 45 a. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, The Academic Questions, Treatise De Finibus, and Tusculan Disputations, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 29247).

Documentéc. 262 a. C.

The keys of the city and the golden crown

Zeno was a foreigner in Athens and never wished to stop being one: when he contributed to the restoration of some baths and saw "Zeno the philosopher" inscribed on the pillar, he asked that "of Citium" be added. Even so, the Athenians entrusted him with the keys of the walls and honoured him with a golden crown and a bronze statue. On his death they voted a decree which Laertius copies: for having exhorted the young who came to him to virtue and temperance for many years and for having offered in his conduct an example consistent with his teaching, he was to be crowned with a golden crown and given a tomb in the Ceramicus at public expense, and the text was to be inscribed on two pillars, one in the Academy and one in the Lyceum. King Antigonus, who had requested the burial through his agent, said he had lost his audience.

Origine du récit: Diogenes Laertius VII 6, 10–12 and 15, who copies the decree. Some scholars believe the transmitted text conflates two different decrees (one during his life and one posthumous); no one doubts that Athens officially honoured Zeno.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

Contestéc. 276–262 a. C.

Zeno and Antigonus

Antigonus Gonatas, king of Macedon, admired Zeno: when in Athens he went to hear him and often invited him to his court. Once he dragged him with other revellers to the house of the musician Aristocles; Zeno slipped away after a while. Laertius copies a letter from the king, who declares himself superior in fortune and inferior in reason and asks him to come and instruct him, since whoever educates the king educates all the Macedonians; and Zeno's reply, excusing himself on account of his eighty years and sending him his pupils Persaeus and Philonides. Epictetus made the relationship an example: when Zeno went to see Antigonus he was not anxious, because the king had no power over anything Zeno valued; it was Antigonus who was anxious to please Zeno.

Origine du récit: Diogenes Laertius VII 6–9 and 13–15 (the letters, from Apollonius of Tyre); Epictetus, Discourses II 13. The friendship between king and philosopher is well attested; the letters are generally regarded as later compositions.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

Contestéc. 262 a. C.

"I come"

Zeno reached a great age without illness, Laertius says. One day, leaving the school, he tripped and broke a toe. He struck the ground with his fist and spoke a line from Timotheus' Niobe: "I come; why do you call me?" And he died there and then, holding his breath. Laertius, who devoted an epigram of his own to the scene, also knows another version: that, worn out by old age, he let himself die of hunger. For later Stoics the anecdote illustrated the "reasonable exit" from life, which the sage undertakes when a sign tells him the time has come; for the modern reader it is also an example of how tradition gave the founders of schools deaths tailored to their doctrine.

Origine du récit: Diogenes Laertius VII 28 and 31, with two versions of the death. Timotheus' Niobe was a well-known dithyramb; the gesture of striking the ground addresses the earth or the underworld. On the "reasonable exit" (eulogos exagoge), see Diogenes Laertius VII 130.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

Enseignements

Enseignements

Les notions qui structurent sa pensée, expliquées dans leur contexte.

Living in agreement (homologia)homologia
The end (*telos*) of human life, according to Zeno, is "living in agreement". Stobaeus explains that Zeno said only that—living in accordance with one single and concordant reason, since those who live in conflict are unhappy—and that Cleanthes added "with nature". Diogenes Laertius, by contrast, already credits Zeno, in his book On Human Nature, with the full formula "living in agreement with nature", which amounts to living according to virtue. The two reports are not wholly contradictory: for the Stoics human nature is rational, and the nature of the universe is governed by the same reason, so that living consistently with one's own reason is living in accordance with the order of the cosmos. Happiness consists in that consistency, and virtue suffices to attain it.

Diogenes Laertius VII 87; Stobaeus, Eclogae II 7 (LS 63B). It is the founding definition of Stoic ethics, taken up by Seneca, Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius.

Source: Durand, Marion; Shogry, Simon; Baltzly, Dirk. «Stoicism». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta; primera publicación del 20 de enero de 2023.

The appropriate (kathekon)kathekon
Zeno was, according to Diogenes Laertius, the first to use the word *kathekon*, and he wrote a treatise on it. It designates the fitting or appropriate action: one which, once done, has a reasonable justification, such as caring for one's health, honouring one's parents or serving one's country. It is an intermediate notion between the perfect action of the sage, which springs from virtue, and error: anyone can perform appropriate actions, though only the sage does so for the right reason and with a firm disposition. It allowed the Stoics to give practical content to a very demanding ethics that recognised virtue as the only good, and to guide the conduct of one still making progress. Cicero rendered it as *officium* in his treatise On Duties, and by that route it reached the modern ethics of duty.

Diogenes Laertius VII 25 and 107–109.

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

The passions (pathe)pathe
Zeno defined passion as an irrational movement of the soul, contrary to nature, or as an excessive impulse. He distinguished four supreme genera: distress or grief (*lype*), fear (*phobos*), desire (*epithymia*) and pleasure (*hedone*), referring to present or future goods and evils as we imagine them. Passions are not forces alien to reason but errors of judgement or their consequences: whoever fears death judges it an evil, and it is not. Hence the sage is not free from feeling but from passions: Stoic *apatheia* is not insensibility but the absence of disturbances. Chrysippus developed the thesis that passions are judgements, and Posidonius disputed it; in Rome Seneca devoted a whole treatise to anger.

Diogenes Laertius VII 110–111 (citing Zeno's On the Passions).

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

Presentation and comprehension (katalepsis)katalepsis
The Stoic theory of knowledge starts from presentation (*phantasia*), the impression objects produce in the soul. Some presentations are "cognitive": they come from what exists, reproduce their object faithfully and could not come from something non-existent. On giving them assent, the mind "grasps" them: that is comprehension (*katalepsis*), a word Zeno coined, according to Cicero, from the gesture of the closed fist. Knowledge (*episteme*) is a comprehension firm and unshakeable by reason, which only the sage possesses. The doctrine provoked the great Hellenistic controversy with Arcesilaus' sceptical Academy, which denied that cognitive presentations exist and recommended suspending judgement.

Cicero, Academica II 145 and I 40–42; Diogenes Laertius VII 46–54.

Source: Cicerón. Académicos II (Lúculo) 145, 45 a. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, The Academic Questions, Treatise De Finibus, and Tusculan Disputations, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 29247).

The two principles: logos and matterlogos-y-materia
In his treatise On Substance, according to Diogenes Laertius, Zeno established that the universe has two principles: a passive one, unqualified matter, and an active one, reason (*logos*) or god, which, eternal, pervades all matter and produces each thing. Both are corporeal, since only bodies can act and be acted upon. God is not an external craftsman, like Plato's demiurge, but the reason immanent in the world, identified with a craftsmanlike fire; the world is a living and rational being, born from fire and returning to it in cycles. The human soul is a fragment of that principle: a warm breath (*pneuma*). This materialist and providential physics underpins the ethics: if the world is governed by reason, living according to reason is living according to the whole.

Diogenes Laertius VII 134, 136, 142 and 157 (On Substance, On the Whole, On the Soul).

Source: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

The world-city (cosmopolis)cosmopolis
Zeno's Republic, written under the influence of Diogenes of Sinope, proposed a community without the institutions of the Greek city: without temples, law courts, gymnasia or coinage, with community of wives and friendship as the bond. In it only the wise are true citizens. Plutarch summed it up as the ideal that all men should be fellow citizens under a common law, like a herd grazing together, and compared it with Alexander's empire. Later Stoics developed the idea of a universal city of gods and rational beings, governed by right reason, which Cicero, Seneca and Marcus Aurelius spread in Rome and which stands at the origin of modern cosmopolitanism and natural law.

Diogenes Laertius VII 32–34; Plutarch, Moralia 329a–b; Schofield (1991).

Source: Schofield, Malcolm. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.

Virtue and indifferentsadiaphora
For Zeno only virtue is good and only vice is bad; everything else—life and death, health and sickness, wealth and poverty, fame and disgrace—is indifferent (*adiaphoron*) with respect to happiness. But not all indifferents have the same value: some are "preferred", like health, and others "dispreferred", like sickness, because they accord with or are contrary to nature. This distinction, which allowed reasonable choice in life without making happiness depend on it, was disputed from within: Ariston of Chios, Zeno's pupil, held that there are no differences of value among indifferents, and the Academy accused the Stoics of merely changing the names of things. It is the core of Stoic serenity before fortune.

Diogenes Laertius VII 101–105 and 160 (Ariston); Cicero, De finibus III–IV.

Source: Durand, Marion; Shogry, Simon; Baltzly, Dirk. «Stoicism». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta; primera publicación del 20 de enero de 2023.

Vidéos

Vidéos

Enregistrements, entretiens et documentaires. Les vidéos sont lues depuis YouTube ; elles ne sont pas hébergées ici.

  • La filosofía helenística (III): El estoicismo · La March

    Conférence· ES· 2022· 59 min

    Fundación Juan MarchChaîne officielle

  • La filosofía helenística (I) · La March

    Conférence· ES· 2022· 57 min

    Fundación Juan MarchChaîne officielle

  • Diógenes, Epicuro y Crisipo | Historia de la filosofía (8/61)

    Conférence· ES· 2017· 87 min

    Ernesto Castro

  • Cynics, Stoics, Epicureans

    Conférence· EN· 2021· 46 min

    Gresham CollegeChaîne officielle

  • A History of Philosophy | 16 Stoicism

    Conférence· EN· 2015· 64 min

    wheatoncollegeChaîne officielle

  • Stoicon 2018: Tony Long "Stoicism Ancient and Modern"

    Conférence· EN· 2018· 50 min

    Modern StoicismChaîne officielle

  • Stoics vs. Skeptics vs. Epicureans | AA Long on Hellenistic Philosophy

    Entretien· EN· 2025· 86 min

    Johnathan Bi

  • The philosophy of Stoicism - Massimo Pigliucci

    Analyse· EN· 2017· 6 min

    TED-EdChaîne officielle

  • Introducing... The Early and Middle Stoics

    Conférence· EN· 2020· 107 min

    Dan Taylor

  • Geschichte der Philosophie (5): Stoa, Epikureer und pyrrhonische Skepsis, Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt

    Conférence· DE· 2013· 76 min

    InstPhilChaîne officielle

Galerie

Galerie

Images dont la licence a été vérifiée. Chacune conserve son auteur et son attribution.

Manuscrits

Manuscrits

Témoins manuscrits et textes anciens, avec leur dépositaire et leurs conditions de consultation.

  • GRC · Mayúscula griega (papiro) · s. I a. C.

    Φιλοδήμου Περὶ τῶν Στωικῶν (PHerc. 155 y 339)

    Témoin conservé
    Rollos carbonizados de la Villa de los Papiros de Herculano.
    Dépositaire
    Biblioteca Nazionale «Vittorio Emanuele III», Officina dei Papiri Ercolanesi, Nápoles · PHerc. 155; PHerc. 339
Manuscrits →

Relations

Relations

Influences, filiations et affinités. On distingue la relation documentée de la similitude identifiée par analyse.

  • Disciple de

    Crates de Tebas

    His first teacher in Athens (Diogenes Laertius VII 2–4); Zeno wrote Memoirs of Crates.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Diogenes of Sinope

    Through Crates, Diogenes' pupil, he inherited Cynic ethics; his Republic continues Diogenes', as Philodemus notes, and it was said he wrote it "on the dog's tail" (Diogenes Laertius VII 4).

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Socrates

    He came to philosophy by reading Xenophon's Memorabilia of Socrates (Diogenes Laertius VII 3); Epictetus names them together as models (Encheiridion 33).

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Plato

    He studied with Polemo, head of the Academy (VII 2, 25); his Republic and his corporeal physics oppose Plato's, and his pupil Persaeus wrote against the Laws (VII 36).

    Relation documentée

  • Contemporain de

    Aristotle

    Zeno was born around 334, when Aristotle was teaching at the Lyceum; no direct relationship is recorded. The Athenian decree in his honour was also to be inscribed at the Lyceum (Diogenes Laertius VII 11).

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

  • Contemporain de

    Epicurus

    They taught at the same time in Athens, the Stoa and the Garden; Epicurus mentions in his letters Zeno's followers called Stoics and Persaeus and Philonides at Antigonus' court (Diogenes Laertius VII 5, 9).

    Relation documentée

  • Maître de

    Cleantes de Aso

    Pupil and successor at the head of the school (Diogenes Laertius VII 37, 168–176).

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    Crisipo de Solos

    Third scholarch, he systematised the doctrine and defended the authenticity of Zeno's Republic (Diogenes Laertius VII 34).

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    Epictetus

    Epictetus holds up Zeno as an example of freedom before Antigonus (Discourses II 13) and advises asking what Socrates or Zeno would have done (Encheiridion 33).

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    Marcus Aurelius

    The last great representative of the Stoa that Zeno founded; the Meditations do not name him, but develop his ethics of agreement with nature and the idea of the universal city.

    Relation documentée

  • A rencontré

    Antígono Gonatas

    The king of Macedon attended his lectures, invited him to his court and asked for him to be buried in the Ceramicus (Diogenes Laertius VII 6–9, 15).

    Relation documentée

  • Idées proches de

    Confucius

    A typological parallel: both conceive virtue as the harmony of the individual with a rational world order and make ethics the basis of public life; there is no historical contact.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

Sources

Sources

Bibliographie et catalogues consultés pour cette fiche.

  1. Wikidata, entidad Q171303 «Zeno of Citium» (91 enlaces entre wikis; P31=Q5). Registra nacimiento en 334 a. C. y muerte en 263 a. C.; lugar de nacimiento, Citio.
  2. Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro VII, 1–160 (Zenón y la doctrina estoica), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).
  3. Diógenes Laercio. Los diez libros de Diógenes Laercio sobre las vidas, opiniones y sentencias de los filósofos más ilustres, trad. de José Ortiz y Sanz, tomo II (libros VI–X). Imprenta Real, Madrid, 1792 (Internet Archive).
  4. Arnim, Hans von (ed.). Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, vol. I: Zeno et Zenonis discipuli. Teubner, Leipzig, 1905 (Internet Archive).
  5. Pearson, Alfred C. (ed.). The Fragments of Zeno and Cleanthes, with Introduction and Explanatory Notes. C. J. Clay, Londres, 1891 (Internet Archive).
  6. Cappelletti, Ángel J. (introd., trad. y notas). Los estoicos antiguos: Zenón, Aristón, Apolófanes, Herilo, Dionisio de Heraclea, Perseo, Cleantes, Esfero. Gredos (Biblioteca Clásica Gredos, 230), Madrid, 1996.
  7. Durand, Marion; Shogry, Simon; Baltzly, Dirk. «Stoicism». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta; primera publicación del 20 de enero de 2023.
  8. Schofield, Malcolm. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
  9. Dorandi, Tiziano. «Filodemo, Gli Stoici (PHerc. 155 e 339)». Cronache Ercolanesi 12 (1982).
  10. Cicerón. Académicos II (Lúculo) 145, 45 a. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, The Academic Questions, Treatise De Finibus, and Tusculan Disputations, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 29247).
  11. Plutarco. Sobre la fortuna o la virtud de Alejandro I 6 (Moralia 329a–b), s. I–II d. C. Texto griego en Wikisource griega.
  12. Epicteto. Disertaciones II 13 y Enquiridión 33, c. 108 d. C. Trad. inglesa de George Long, A Selection from the Discourses of Epictetus with the Encheiridion (Project Gutenberg n.º 10661).
  13. Long, A. A. y Sedley, D. N. The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987 (Estobeo, Églogas II 7 sobre el fin: LS 63B).
  14. Sellars, John. Stoicism. Acumen, Chesham, 2006 (Ancient Philosophies, 1).
  15. Inwood, Brad y Gerson, Lloyd P. (trads.). The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Hackett, Indianápolis, 2008.
  16. «Zeno of Citium», Wikipedia en inglés, y «Zenón de Citio», Wikipedia en español (consultadas para contrastar datos y bibliografía; texto propio).
  17. Open Library (Internet Archive): ediciones de los estoicos antiguos y de Diógenes Laercio verificadas por ISBN.
  18. Inwood, Brad (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
Ayant droit
Textos antiguos en dominio público; cada traducción y edición moderna pertenece a su traductor o editorial

En attente de confirmation

Ce que cette fiche n'a pas encore pu établir. Nous préférons le dire plutôt que de combler.

  • Fechas: se adopta c. 334–262 a. C. (cronología de Perseo y decreto del arcontado de Arrénides, 262/261); Wikidata da la muerte en 263. Laercio da también 98 años de vida y una llegada a Atenas a los 30.
  • Numeración SVF: comprobar los números de fragmento de la República y de cada tratado en SVF I (se ha citado solo el total, 1–332, para Zenón).
  • Edición española de Gredos de 2001 (ISBN 9788424925918): confirmar si es reedición del volumen de Cappelletti (BCG 230) o una obra distinta.
  • Traducción española de dominio público de los fragmentos de Zenón: no localizada; solo la de Diógenes Laercio por Ortiz y Sanz (1792).
  • Manuscritos: no hay manuscritos de obras de Zenón; se registra el papiro de Filodemo. Verificar su digitalización.
  • Imágenes: la estatua moderna de Zenón en Lárnaca (Plaza de Europa) existe en Commons, pero no se ha incluido por ser una escultura moderna que puede estar protegida por derechos de autor; revisar su licencia y la libertad de panorama en Chipre.
  • Programas de afiliación: ninguno verificado. Lista vacía.
  • Vídeos: no se ha encontrado un documental de televisión pública dedicado a Zenón en canal oficial; los vídeos son lecciones generales sobre el estoicismo antiguo.

Recherche effectuée le 2026-10-25