Aller au contenu
The ConsciousLibrary

Islam · Soufisme

Attar

فریدالدین ابوحامد محمد عطار نیشابوری · عطار

v. 1145 – 1221Personne historiquement documentée

Poète et hagiographe persan (Nichapour, v. 1145-v. 1221), apothicaire de son état et figure majeure de la poésie soufie. Sa Conférence des oiseaux (Mantiq al-tayr) raconte le voyage des oiseaux à travers sept vallées jusqu'à découvrir que le Simorgh, c'est eux-mêmes ; avec le Livre divin, le Livre de l'épreuve et le Livre des secrets, elle forme un cycle de masnavis mystiques, et son Mémorial des saints est le grand recueil persan de vies de saints. Bien des œuvres qui circulent sous son nom sont d'un autre Attar. Rumi fut son héritier.

œuvres
29œuvres
éditions
32éditions
citations
6citations
vidéos
13vidéos
images
8images
La asamblea de las aves

La asamblea de las aves · CC0

Dans ses propres mots

«Praise to the pure Creator of the soul, who gave the dust a soul and gave it faith.»

Mantiq al-tayr, dístico inicial («Fi al-tawhid»), texto persa según Ganjoor; traducciones propias.

Son idée centrale

The Simorgh and the thirty birds: The Simorgh is a fabulous bird of Iranian tradition, wise and benevolent, which in the *Shahnameh* raises the hero Zal.

Biographie

6 min de lecture

Traduction assistée à partir de l'original espagnol, en attente de relecture par un traducteur natif.

L'apothicaire de Nichapour

Abou Hamid Mohammad, fils d'Abou Bakr Ibrahim, signa son œuvre de deux noms : Farid al-Din, « perle de la religion », et Attar, le métier de celui qui vend parfums, drogues et remèdes. Il vécut à Nichapour, la grande ville du Khorassan, et l'on sait fort peu de chose de sa vie avec certitude. Deux contemporains seulement le mentionnent : l'anthologiste Mohammad Awfi, qui le range parmi les poètes de l'époque seldjoukide, et le philosophe Nasir al-Din Tusi, qui, encore étudiant, lui rendit visite alors qu'Attar était déjà un vieillard, et confia des années plus tard à son disciple Ibn al-Fuwati combien son éloquence l'avait frappé. La notice suivante, celle du Tarikh-e gozideh de Hamdallah Mostowfi, date de 1330.

Son œuvre parle peu de lui, mais elle dit une chose précise : qu'il exerçait la pharmacie et recevait en personne une foule de clients, et qu'il composa le Livre de l'épreuve (Mosibat-nameh) et le Livre divin (Elahi-nameh) tout en travaillant dans son officine. Comme il ne dépendait pas de la poésie pour vivre, il put mépriser le métier de panégyriste de cour, qu'il ne pratiqua jamais. Bernd Reinert souligne que son existence de pharmacien et de soufi ne semble pas avoir été interrompue par des voyages, et que dans sa vieillesse il vécut très retiré ; les grandes pérégrinations à La Mecque, à Damas ou en Inde que lui prêtent des biographies plus tardives relèvent de la légende.

Des dates incertaines

Badiozzaman Forouzanfar a calculé qu'il naquit vers 540 de l'hégire (1145-1146) ; la seule date qu'Attar mentionne lui-même, 573 (1177), comme l'année où il acheva La Conférence des oiseaux, figure dans un vers qui ne se trouve pas dans tous les manuscrits. Quant à sa mort, l'opinion la plus répandue, que suivent Forouzanfar et Reinert, veut qu'il ait péri dans le massacre par lequel les Mongols dévastèrent Nichapour en safar 618, c'est-à-dire en avril 1221 ; Hermann Landolt rappelle que 1230 demeure possible. L'Encyclopaedia Britannica de 1911, fidèle aux sources tardives, lui accordait encore cent dix ans de vie, de 1119 à 1229 : un exemple de la manière dont le personnage grandit à mesure que son œuvre devenait célèbre.

Les légendes

De son vivant, Attar n'était guère connu hors de Nichapour. Sa grandeur de mystique et de conteur fut découverte au XVe siècle, et c'est alors que Djami et Dowlatchah de Samarcande ornèrent sa biographie de récits merveilleux. Selon Dowlatchah, un derviche qui contemplait sa boutique lui demanda comment il comptait mourir en laissant derrière lui tant de marchandises ; Attar abandonna l'officine et se fit soufi. Selon le même auteur, un soldat mongol qui l'avait capturé refusa mille dirhams pour lui et, lorsqu'un autre en offrit un sac de paille, Attar lui conseilla d'accepter, car il ne valait pas davantage ; le soldat, furieux, le tua. Forouzanfar a démontré que les maîtres qu'on lui a attribués — Nadjm al-Din Kobra, Qotb al-Din Heydar et d'autres — sont des inventions ; seule est plausible sa relation avec Madjd al-Din Baghdadi, qu'il dit lui-même avoir connu, et peut-être une filiation uwaysi, intérieure, avec Abou Saïd Abol-Kheyr.

Une œuvre qui grandit avec sa renommée

La légende lui attribua autant d'ouvrages que le Coran compte de sourates, et démêler lesquels sont de sa main a occupé les spécialistes pendant un siècle. Hellmut Ritter releva des différences de style et de confession — certaines œuvres sont sunnites, d'autres chiites — et songea d'abord à une évolution du poète ; en 1941, Saïd Nafisi prouva que celles d'inspiration chiite, comme le Mazhar al-adja'ib et le Lisan al-ghayb, sont d'un autre Attar, originaire de Tun, qui vécut à Mechhed quelque deux cent cinquante ans plus tard. Un second groupe, emmené par le Djawhar al-dhat et centré sur la figure d'al-Hallaj, ne lui appartient pas davantage pour des raisons de style, bien que son auteur reste à identifier. Attar dresse lui-même la liste de ses œuvres dans ses prologues : le Divan, l'Asrar-nameh, La Conférence des oiseaux, le Mosibat-nameh, l'Elahi-nameh, le Djavaher-nameh et le Charh al-qalb, et il ajoute qu'il a détruit ces deux derniers de ses propres mains.

À cette liste s'ajoutent le Mokhtar-nameh, choix de ses quatrains, et le Tadhkirat al-awliya, son unique ouvrage en prose. Le cas le plus débattu est celui du Khosrow-nameh, roman courtois aussi appelé Gol o Hormoz : Reinert le tenait pour authentique ; Mohammad Reza Shafi'i-Kadkani a soutenu qu'il s'agit d'un faux plus tardif et que le titre par lequel Attar désignait une autre de ses œuvres correspondait en réalité à l'Elahi-nameh, thèse que Landolt tient pour démontrée ; en 2019, Austin O'Malley a rouvert la question avec un manuscrit de 1297 qui l'attribue déjà à Attar.

Les quatre masnavis mystiques

L'Asrar-nameh, ou Livre des secrets, dépourvu de récit-cadre, médite en vingt-deux discours sur la chute de l'âme et sa délivrance des liens du monde. La Conférence des oiseaux (Mantiq al-tayr), son chef-d'œuvre, emprunte à la Risalat al-tayr attribuée aux frères Ghazali l'assemblée des oiseaux en quête d'un roi : guidés par la huppe, ils traversent sept vallées et trente seulement parviennent devant le Simorgh, pour découvrir que le Simorgh, c'est eux-mêmes, si morgh, « trente oiseaux ». Le Livre de l'épreuve suit un pèlerin qui interroge quarante êtres, de l'ange Gabriel aux prophètes, jusqu'à ce que l'Âme universelle lui révèle que ce qu'il cherche est en lui. Dans le Livre divin, un calife répond aux désirs mondains de ses six fils — la fille du roi des fées, la magie, la coupe de Djamchid, l'eau de la vie, l'anneau de Salomon, l'alchimie — en leur montrant leur sens intérieur. Les quatre œuvres disent la même chose de quatre manières : le but de l'homme est caché en lui.

Le mémorial des saints

Le Tadhkirat al-awliya, ou Mémorial des saints, rassemble les vies et les paroles des maîtres du soufisme classique, de Dja'far al-Sadiq, Uways al-Qarani et Hasan de Bassora jusqu'à al-Hallaj, en qui Attar voyait celui qui avait porté le soufisme à sa perfection. Les biographies plus tardives que contiennent certaines copies ne sont pas de lui. Attar ne cite presque jamais ses sources et remanie les récits à sa guise, si bien que le livre éclaire peu l'histoire des personnages qu'il dépeint, mais beaucoup la sensibilité soufie ; il traduisit en outre en persan, avec une grande fidélité, les paroles transmises en arabe. Dès la seconde moitié du XIIIe siècle, il fut très lu ; une ancienne version en turc oriental, en écriture ouïgoure, fut traduite en français par Pavet de Courteille en 1889.

Postérité

Rumi adopta pour son Masnavi le mètre de La Conférence des oiseaux et réécrivit des histoires d'Attar. La tradition voulut davantage : que le vieux poète, voyant passer à Nichapour la famille de Baha al-Din Walad, eût offert à l'enfant Rumi un exemplaire de l'Asrar-nameh. Ritter expliqua la légende par l'influence de cet ouvrage sur le prologue du Masnavi, et Franklin Lewis y voit un mythe de succession. Ali Shir Navaï adapta La Conférence des oiseaux en turc tchaghataï et fit élever le mausolée de Nichapour, restauré en 1940. L'Europe le découvrit par le Pend-nameh que traduisit Silvestre de Sacy en 1819, aujourd'hui tenu pour apocryphe, puis par l'édition (1857) et la traduction (1863) du Mantic uttaïr, ou le Langage des oiseaux de Garcin de Tassy, qui enthousiasma Edward FitzGerald au point qu'il en donna une version libre, Bird-Parliament, restée inédite de son vivant et publiée à titre posthume en 1889.

Sources: «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource. · FitzGerald, Edward. Letters and Literary Remains of Edward FitzGerald, ed. William Aldis Wright, vol. II. Londres: Macmillan, 1889 (incluye «Bird-Parliament» con la nota de E. B. Cowell sobre su génesis). · Attar, Farid al-Din. The Tadhkiratu 'l-awliya («Memoirs of the saints»), ed. Reynold A. Nicholson, con introducción de Mirza Muhammad Qazvini. 2 vols. Londres y Leiden: Luzac / Brill, 1905–1907 (Persian Historical Texts).

Chronologie

La vie, année après année

Chaque point est un événement documenté. Cliquez pour le lire, avec sa source et son degré de certitude.

  1. v. 1145 · 0 ans

    Birth in Nishapur

    Abu Hamid Muhammad, son of Abu Bakr Ibrahim, is born. Foruzanfar calculates c. 540/1145–1146; the 1911 Britannica, following late sources, gave 1119.

    Probable

  2. v. 1170 – 1221

    Druggist and Sufi

    He practises pharmacy in Nishapur and attends many customers; according to his prefaces, he composes the *Musibat-nama* and the *Ilahi-nama* in the shop. The legends of his conversion by a dervish date from the fifteenth century.

    Documenté

  3. 1177

    Date of the Mantiq al-tayr

    A closing line of the *Mantiq al-tayr* dates its completion to 573/1177, but it is not found in all manuscripts.

    Contesté

  4. v. 1209

    Meeting with Majd al-Din Baghdadi

    Attar says in the *Tadhkirat al-awliya* that he met Majd al-Din Baghdadi, disciple of Najm al-Din Kubra, who died around 1209; he is the only plausible master among those tradition ascribed to him.

    Probable

  5. v. 1215 – 1221

    Visit of Nasir al-Din Tusi

    The young Tusi visits the aged Attar in Nishapur (between 612/1215 and 618/1221, according to Foruzanfar) and praises his eloquence, as transmitted by his pupil Ibn al-Fuwati.

    Documenté

  6. avril 1221

    Death in the Mongol sack of Nishapur

    According to the most widespread opinion (Foruzanfar, Reinert), he dies violently in the massacre of Safar 618/April 1221; Landolt considers 1230 possible. The tale of the sack of straw is Dawlatshah's legend.

    Probable

  7. 1297

    Oldest manuscript of the Khusraw-nama

    A copy of 1297, now in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, already contains the romance and its preface under Attar's name: Austin O'Malley adduces it in 2019 against the forgery thesis.

    Documenté

  8. 1330

    Mustawfi's mention

    Hamdallah Mustawfi mentions him in the *Tarikh-e guzida*, the third surviving notice after those of Awfi and Tusi.

    Documenté

  9. v. 1486

    The legend is born

    In the fifteenth century his work is rediscovered; Jami (*Nafahat al-uns*, 1476–1478) and Dawlatshah (*Tadhkirat al-shu'ara*, 1486) embroider his life with tales of conversion, masters and death. Ali Shir Nava'i raises a mausoleum for him in Nishapur.

    Documenté

  10. 1819

    The Pand-nama in Europe

    Silvestre de Sacy publishes in Paris the *Pend-Namèh, ou le Livre des conseils*, the first 'Attar' work translated in Europe; modern scholarship considers it apocryphal.

    Documenté

  11. 1857 – 1863

    Garcin de Tassy's edition

    Joseph Garcin de Tassy edits the Persian text of the *Mantiq al-tayr* (1857) and publishes his French translation in 1863; Edward FitzGerald, delighted, composes his free version *Bird-Parliament* (1862, posthumous in 1889).

    Documenté

  12. 1905 – 1907

    Nicholson's edition of the Tadhkirat

    Reynold A. Nicholson publishes in London and Leiden, with an introduction by Muhammad Qazvini, the edition of the *Tadhkirat al-awliya* (1905–1907).

    Documenté

  13. 1940

    Ilahi-nama edition and renovation of the mausoleum

    Hellmut Ritter publishes the critical edition of the *Ilahi-nama* (Leipzig and Istanbul); the Nishapur mausoleum is fully renovated under Reza Shah.

    Documenté

  14. 1941

    Nafisi identifies the 'other Attar'

    Sa'id Nafisi shows in his *Jostoju dar ahval o asar-e Farid al-Din Attar* that the Shi'ite works ascribed to Attar belong to a namesake from Tun who lived in Mashhad some two and a half centuries later.

    Documenté

  15. 1984

    Davis and Darbandi translation

    Afkham Darbandi and Dick Davis publish *The Conference of the Birds* in Penguin Classics, the most widely read English verse version.

    Documenté

Œuvres

Œuvres essentielles

Les œuvres sans lesquelles on ne comprend pas son héritage.

Mantiq al-tayr (The Conference of the Birds) — Attar

Œuvre écrite · v. 1177

Mantiq al-tayr (The Conference of the Birds)

منطق‌الطیر (Mantiq al-tayr), también مقامات الطیور (Maqamat al-tuyur)

A masnavi of several thousand couplets and Attar's masterpiece. The birds of the world gather to choose a king; the hoopoe, Solomon's messenger, proposes that they seek the Simorgh. Each bird excuses itself with a human weakness (the nightingale's love for the rose, the parrot's longing for immortality, the peacock's paradise) and the hoopoe answers with stories, among them that of Shaykh San'an in love with a Christian girl. Those who set out cross seven valleys: quest, love, knowledge, detachment, unity, bewilderment, and poverty and annihilation. Only thirty arrive, and they discover that the Simorgh is their own reflection: *si morgh*, 'thirty birds'. The frame story comes from the Ghazalis' *Risalat al-tayr*.

14 éditions

Œuvre écrite

Ilahi-nama (The Book of God)

الهی‌نامه (Ilahi-nama)

A masnavi of some 6,500 couplets with a frame story: a caliph asks his six sons what they desire, and each asks for something marvellous (the daughter of the king of the fairies, mastery of magic, Jamshid's world-reflecting cup, the water of life, Solomon's ring, alchemy). The father shows them that, taken literally, these wishes are absurd, but that understood inwardly they can be fulfilled: the princess is the purified soul, the cup is the mystic united with God, the elixir is the divine light that transforms everything. Hundreds of stories, from three to four hundred lines, illustrate the same message as the *Mantiq al-tayr*: what man seeks is within him.

3 éditions

Tadhkirat al-awliya (Memorial of God's Friends) — Attar

Œuvre écrite

Tadhkirat al-awliya (Memorial of God's Friends)

تذکرة الأولیاء (Tadhkirat al-awliya)

Attar's only prose work and the great Persian collection of saints' lives: some seventy biographies of masters of classical Sufism, from Ja'far al-Sadiq, Uways al-Qarani and Hasan of Basra to al-Hallaj, with their sayings and anecdotes, among them those of Rabi'a al-Adawiyya. Attar relies almost solely on written sources he rarely names and reworks the stories with a taste of his own, but he translates the Arabic sayings faithfully. The account of al-Hallaj's execution is its most famous page. Widely read since the thirteenth century, it also matters as a specimen of early Persian prose.

6 éditions

Toute son œuvre (29)

Voir ses 29 œuvres dans la bibliothèque

Citations

Citations localisées dans une œuvre précise. Chacune porte sa provenance et son degré de fiabilité.

Praise to the pure Creator of the soul, who gave the dust a soul and gave it faith.

آفرین جان آفرین پاک را / آن که جان بخشید و ایمان خاک را

VérifiéeMantiq al-tayr, dístico inicial («Fi al-tawhid»), texto persa según Ganjoor; traducciones propias.

1 / 6
Citations apocryphes ou d'attribution contestée (2)
  • «Boundless praise to that pure God who gave faith to a handful of dust.»

    Opening couplet of the *Pand-nama*, which imitates the beginning of the *Mantiq al-tayr*. Ritter considers it apocryphal: there is no trace of the work before the fifteenth century and its language is alien to Attar's, although it was the first work 'of his' translated in Europe (Silvestre de Sacy, 1819).

  • «Praise to the Creator of the soul and soul of the soul, who is both manifest and hidden.»

    Opening of the *Mazhar al-aja'ib*, a fifteenth-century Shi'ite poem composed by the Attar of Tun and ascribed for centuries to Farid al-Din; Sa'id Nafisi showed in 1941 that it belongs to that late namesake.

Dernières paroles

Attribution traditionnelle

«Sell me for the sack of straw, for I am worth no more.»

Words put in his mouth by the legend transmitted by Dawlatshah of Samarkand (1486), more than two and a half centuries later: captured by a Mongol soldier, he is said to have refused to be sold for a thousand dirhams and then advised accepting a sack of straw (or fodder), which enraged the soldier, who killed him. It is a Sufi parable on the worth of the self, not a testimony; it is not even certain that he died in 1221.

Source: «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource.

Interroger

Ce que répond son œuvre

Douze grandes questions de l'humanité et ce que ses textes permettent d'y répondre, références à l'appui. Nous ne lui prêtons jamais de paroles.

  • Qu'est-ce que l'Absolu ? Dieu existe-t-il ?

    The Creator praised is also the mirror where the seeker is lost

    À la fois personnel et impersonnelIl le dit expressément

    Attar opens The Conference of the Birds by praising a personal Creator who gave soul to dust and granted it faith, and in the Memorial of the Saints he gathers prayers addressed to a Thou who answers. But the ending of the same poem shows another face of the divine. The Simurgh, the king the birds seek through seven valleys, turns out to be a mirror: the thirty birds who arrive — si murgh, in Persian — see that those thirty birds are the Simurgh, and the Presence explains to them, without tongue, that whoever arrives sees himself in it. Then they are lost in Him like a shadow in the sun. The Absolute is at once the King who is sought and entreated and the faceless unity in which the seeker is extinguished.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qui suis-je ? Existe-t-il un vrai soi ?

    The thirty birds discover that they are the Simurgh

    Le Soi est l'AbsoluIl le dit expressément

    Attar's answer lies in the ending of The Conference of the Birds. Thousands of birds set out in search of their king, the Simurgh; only thirty survive the seven valleys. On arriving, they see that those thirty birds, si murgh in Persian, are the Simurgh, and the Presence tells them it is a mirror in which whoever arrives sees himself, soul and body. What the seeker finds at the end of the path is not a different object but his own reality in God. To get there one must cross the valley of poverty and annihilation (fana), where the self is consumed like the moth in the flame. The self being sought is not the one that sets out on the journey: it is the one that appears when that one has been extinguished.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi souffrons-nous ?

    The soul's unrest is longing for the King; its pain is already the path

    La séparation d'avec DieuIl le dit expressément

    Attar wrote an entire book on affliction, the Musibat-nama: a restless wayfarer, guided by his master, questions angels, prophets, elements and creatures without anything calming his unrest, until he discovers that what he seeks lies in the ocean of the soul. The root of suffering is separation from the King: the birds of The Conference of the Birds live without a sovereign, scattered and busy with their attachments, and each makes an excuse not to set out. But Attar does not want to suppress this pain. The pain (dard) of the search is precious, because it is what sets one moving: whoever enters the valley of the quest meets a hundred hardships at every moment, and only through them advances. What is truly tragic is not to feel the lack.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Que se passe-t-il après la mort ?

    Dying to oneself in the valley of annihilation to subsist in God

    Vie éternelle et résurrectionIl le dit expressément

    Attar shares the eschatology of Islam, but his attention lies on another death: the one the seeker must pass through in life. The seventh valley of The Conference of the Birds is that of poverty and annihilation (fana), where the self is lost like a drop in the ocean or a moth in the flame; the poem adds that after this extinction the birds are returned to themselves and subsist in God. In the Memorial of the Saints he narrates the death of many masters as the culmination of their path, and his account of the execution of al-Hallaj is one of the most famous. Legend attributes to Attar himself a death at the hands of a Mongol soldier, with a last gesture of detachment, but it is a late account.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Comment atteint-on la libération ou le salut ?

    Crossing seven valleys with a guide: of thousands of birds, thirty arrive

    Par une pratique disciplinéeIl le dit expressément

    The Conference of the Birds is an itinerary. The hoopoe announces to the birds that there are seven valleys on the way: the quest, love, knowledge, detachment, unity, bewilderment and, finally, poverty and annihilation; after that lies the King's court. Before setting out, each bird presents its excuse — the nightingale its rose, the hawk its king, the duck its water — and the hoopoe answers each with a story that dismantles its attachment. Liberation thus requires sustained effort, a guide and the progressive renunciation of all that holds one back. Many die on the way or give up; only thirty arrive. What they find at the end, however, is not a reward earned: it is their own annihilation in the Simurgh.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Faut-il un maître ?

    Without the hoopoe, no bird would have set out to seek the King

    IndispensableIl le dit expressément

    In The Conference of the Birds the birds do not set out on their own: they need the hoopoe, who knows the way, has been with Solomon and knows where the Simurgh lives. Before leaving they cast lots to choose a guide, and the lot falls on her; from then on they follow her, question her and confide their fears to her, and she answers each with a story. In The Book of Affliction the wayfarer also advances accompanied by a master who interprets what each creature tells him. For Attar, without a guide the soul gets lost in its excuses and in the dangers of the journey. The Memorial of the Saints is, at bottom, a gallery of masters whose lives and words serve as a guide to the reader.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Le monde est-il réel ?

    All the birds are the shadow of the Simurgh

    Manifestation du divinIl le dit expressément

    In The Conference of the Birds the hoopoe tells that the Simurgh first manifested itself in China, at midnight, and let fall a feather; all the images and arts of the world arise from the attempt to reproduce it. Later she explains to the birds that when the Simurgh showed its face its shadow fell upon the earth, and from that shadow came the birds: each of them is a shadow of the King it seeks. The world, then, is neither illusion nor autonomous reality but manifestation: reflection, shadow or trace of a beauty that exceeds it. That is why it can lead the seeker to that beauty, and why it can also hold him back, when the shadow is mistaken for the one who casts it.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qu'est-ce que l'amour ?

    Love is a fire that burns reason: the valley of love

    Le désir ardent et l'unionIl le dit expressément

    In The Conference of the Birds the second valley is that of love: whoever enters it must be all fire, and whoever is not cannot cross it. Love does not calculate, knows neither prudence nor reputation, and that is why Attar constantly sets it against reason, which stops at the threshold. His most famous story shows it to the point of scandal: Shaykh San'an, a venerated master, falls in love with a Christian girl, abandons his faith, tends pigs for her, and returns to Islam only through his disciples' intercession. The story does not approve of apostasy; it teaches that love drags one on to lose everything and that only such total detachment prepares for true Love, in which the lover is finally consumed.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Sommes-nous libres ou tout est-il déterminé ?

    No theory of freedom: in the valley of independence, all is God's

    Ne s'est pas prononcé

    Attar does not address free will as a theological problem. His poems presuppose both the seeker's decision and God's sovereignty. The birds of The Conference of the Birds choose to set out or to stay, and each is responsible for its excuses; but in the fourth valley, that of independence (istighna), the hoopoe describes a God who needs nothing and no one, before whom a hundred worlds may burn without its mattering. And in the valley of unity everything is discovered to be one, so that the distinction between the one who acts and what happens fades away. Attar lets effort and absolute divine self-sufficiency coexist without trying to reconcile them in a doctrine.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi méditer ou prier ?

    The prayer of the saints: intimate converse with God, without calculation

    L'amitié avec DieuCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    Attar wrote no treatise on prayer, but his work is full of it. His masnavis open with praises and supplications to God, and the Memorial of the Saints gathers dozens of prayers of the Sufi masters, among them Rabia's famous one, which asks to be burned in hell if she worships from fear and not to be deprived of eternal beauty if she worships for God Himself. In the stories of his poems, the one who truly prays is often God's madman or the beggar, who speaks to the Lord with a frankness that would scandalise the pious. What Attar celebrates is that relationship without intermediaries or calculation, in which the soul addresses God as a Friend, with complaints, entreaties and love.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • La raison peut-elle connaître l'ultime ?

    Reason stops at the threshold; love and bewilderment go on

    L'ultime est au-delà du mentalIl le dit expressément

    Attar insistently sets love against reason. In the valley of love of The Conference of the Birds reason has no place: love is fire and reason, smoke. In the valley of knowledge each traveller sees according to his capacity, and no knowledge is the same for all. Further on, in the valley of bewilderment (hayrat), the seeker no longer knows anything, not even whether he exists or not, whether he is inside or outside; it is a perplexity worth more than all certainties. The stories of God's madmen that fill his masnavis say the same with humour: the one who has lost his mind sometimes sees more than the sage. For Attar the ultimate is not thought: it is suffered and loved.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Se retirer du monde ou le transformer ?

    He wrote his poems in the pharmacy, among hundreds of patients

    La contemplation dans l'actionCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    Attar was neither a withdrawn ascetic nor the shaykh of an order, but a pharmacist of Nishapur. In the introduction to the Khusraw-nama he tells that he composed The Book of Affliction and The Divine Book in his pharmacy, where hundreds of patients consulted him every day. His doctrine, however, demands radical detachment: the birds of The Conference of the Birds must abandon wealth, affections and securities, and the fourth valley is that of independence from everything. Attar resolves the tension in a way characteristic of Persian Sufism: detachment is inward and does not require giving up one's trade. One can heal bodies, sell remedies and write verses while the heart travels the valleys of the path.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres

Anecdotes et récits

Anecdotes et récits

Récit hagiographiques. XII (según la leyenda)

The dervish at the shop

Attar was in his shop in Nishapur, surrounded by jars and goods, when a wandering dervish stopped at the door and gazed sadly inside. The druggist ordered him to move on. "It costs me nothing to go," the dervish replied, "but I pity you: how will you be able to think of death and leave all these goods behind?" The words came at the right moment: Attar closed the shop, became the disciple of a Sufi master and began the life that would make him the great poet of the spiritual path. In some versions the dervish, to show how easy it is to die, lies down on the ground and expires on the spot.

Origine du récit: A story transmitted by Dawlatshah of Samarkand (*Tadhkirat al-shu'ara*, 1486) and summarised by the 1911 *Britannica*; Reinert counts it among the initiation myths created in the fifteenth century. Attar's own work shows that he went on practising as a pharmacist while writing his poems.

Source: «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource.

Récit hagiographique1221 (según la leyenda)

A thousand dirhams or a sack of straw

When the Mongols took Nishapur, the legend goes, a soldier captured the aged Attar. Someone offered a thousand dirhams for him, and the poet advised the soldier not to sell, since he would surely be offered more. Soon another man came by and offered a sack of straw, or of horse fodder, for the old man. "Sell me," said Attar, "for I am worth no more." The soldier, enraged at having lost the first offer, killed him on the spot. The tale turns the poet's death into a last lesson on the nothingness of the self, in keeping with the valley of poverty and annihilation in which the *Mantiq al-tayr* culminates.

Origine du récit: Dawlatshah (1486), summarised by the 1911 *Britannica*. That Attar died in the Nishapur massacre of 1221 is the most widespread opinion (Foruzanfar, Reinert), but Landolt allows for 1230; the details of the dialogue are legend.

Source: «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource.

Récit hagiographiquec. 1216 (según la leyenda)

The old poet and the boy Rumi

Around 1216 the family of the preacher Baha al-Din Walad left Khorasan heading west. According to tradition, passing through Nishapur they visited the aged Attar, who saw the preacher's son, little Jalal al-Din, and predicted that the child would kindle a fire in the hearts of God's lovers. As a token he gave him a copy of his *Asrar-nama*, the book of secrets. The scene offered Rumi's devotees a perfect chain of transmission between the two great mystical poets of the Persian language, and it is still repeated in almost every popular biography.

Origine du récit: A tradition of the late anthologies. Hellmut Ritter explained it as a reflection of the *Asrar-nama*'s influence on the prologue of the *Masnavi* (Reinert), and Franklin Lewis (2000) considers it a succession myth, as summarised by Landolt. There is no contemporary source for the meeting.

Source: Landolt, Hermann. «Farid al-Din 'Attar». En Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopaedia. Nueva York: Routledge, 2006; versión publicada por The Institute of Ismaili Studies.

Témoignage1215–1221

Tusi visits the old druggist

Between 1215 and 1221, a student from Tus who would become one of the great philosophers and astronomers of Islam, Nasir al-Din Tusi, visited Attar in Nishapur when he was already a very old man. Years later he told his pupil Ibn al-Fuwati what had impressed him: the poet's eloquence and his way of interpreting the discourse of the Sufi masters, the knowers of God. Tusi spoke mainly of his 'great divan' and mentioned only one narrative poem, the *Mantiq al-tayr*; he also noted how prolific he was. It is one of only two direct testimonies about Attar that survive.

Origine du récit: Tusi's report transmitted by his pupil Ibn al-Fuwati (d. 1323); dates according to Foruzanfar's reckoning. Recorded by Reinert and Landolt.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Documentés. XII–XIII

Poems written in the pharmacy

Unlike court poets, Attar did not live by his verse. In the *Asrar-nama* he recalls that he personally attended a great many customers in his pharmacy, and in the second preface of the *Khusraw-nama* he says that he began the *Musibat-nama* and the *Ilahi-nama* while working there. The image of the druggist preparing remedies for the body while composing poems on the healing of the soul is not a later allegory: it is what he himself says. He also tells that, when writing, more ideas came to him than he could use, and that the effort of composition put him in a state that kept him from sleeping.

Origine du récit: Attar's own statements in the *Asrar-nama* (p. 170 and vv. 3146–3151 of Gowharin's edition) and in the second preface of the *Khusraw-nama* (Ritter, 'Philologika X', 1939), recorded by Reinert. Should the *Khusraw-nama* not be his, as Shafi'i-Kadkani argues, this last point would lose support.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Documentés. XII–XIII

Two books cast into the fire

In the preface to the *Mukhtar-nama*, Attar lists the works he had written and adds an unusual detail: two of them, the *Jawahir-nama* and the *Sharh al-qalb*, he destroyed with his own hands. He does not fully explain his reasons, and nothing but the titles remains of those books. The gesture contrasts with the proud awareness the poet had of his art (he called himself the 'seal of the poets') and with the abundance his contemporaries reproached him for. For modern scholarship it also has a practical value: Attar's list is the starting point for separating his authentic works from the dozens ascribed to him.

Origine du récit: Preface to the *Mukhtar-nama* (text in Ritter, 'Philologika X', pp. 147–153), cited by Reinert and Landolt.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Enseignements

Enseignements

Les notions qui structurent sa pensée, expliquées dans leur contexte.

The Simorgh and the thirty birdssimurgh
The Simorgh is a fabulous bird of Iranian tradition, wise and benevolent, which in the *Shahnameh* raises the hero Zal. Attar turns it into a symbol of the divine Reality, inaccessible and sovereign, to which all creatures aspire. The outcome of the *Mantiq al-tayr* rests on a pun: *si morgh* means 'thirty birds' in Persian. The thirty birds that survive the journey, now purified, behold the Simorgh and discover that it is their own reflection, and that they are it. The Presence, they are told, is a mirror like the sun: whoever arrives sees himself. Attar thus expresses his deepest conviction, that man finds the supreme Being within himself, but only after measuring the distance between his dependence and the majesty he seeks.

It reworks the motif of the birds' journey to the king from the *Risalat al-tayr* of Avicenna and the Ghazalis.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

The seven valleyshaft-vadi
The hoopoe tells the birds that between them and the Simorgh's court lie seven valleys, from which no one has returned to tell their extent: the quest (*talab*), where everything must be renounced; love (*ishq*), where reason is abandoned; knowledge (*ma'rifat*), in which each wayfarer sees according to his capacity; detachment (*istighna*), where desires and the world lose their worth; unity (*tawhid*), in which all is seen as one; bewilderment (*hayrat*), in which the wayfarer no longer knows anything, not even whether he exists; and poverty and annihilation (*faqr* and *fana*), where the self disappears. Each valley is illustrated with stories. The scheme turns the stations (*maqamat*) of the Sufi path into a narrative itinerary and has become one of the most widespread images of Islamic mysticism.

It turns into an itinerary the stations (*maqamat*) and states (*ahwal*) of the Sufi manuals.

Source: Attar. Obras en persa: Diván, Mantiq al-tayr, Ilahi-nama, Asrar-nama, Musibat-nama, Mujtar-nama, Tadhkirat al-awliya y obras atribuidas (Pand-nama, Bulbul-nama, Ushtur-nama, Yawhar al-dhat, Mazhar al-ayaib, Haylay-nama, Bisar-nama, Waslat-nama, Si fasl, Bayan al-irshad, Nuzhat al-ahbab, Jusraw-nama). Ganjoor.

Love and reasonishq-o-aql
The opposition between reason (*aql*) and love (*ishq*) runs through all of Attar's work, which introduces it as a central theme in the fifth discourse of the *Asrar-nama*. Reason is useful for practical life and for the religious sciences he valued (law, exegesis, prophetic tradition), but it cannot cross the threshold of the divine; love can, because it demands risking everything. Attar distrusted the Aristotelian heritage and never wished to reveal nature's secrets in his poems, not even those of the medicine he knew by trade. His heroes of love are often madmen, beggars or sinners, like Shaykh San'an, who gives up everything for a Christian girl. In the *Mantiq al-tayr*, the valley of love immediately follows that of the quest and precedes that of knowledge.

A common theme of Persian mysticism since Ahmad Ghazali and Sanai; Rumi inherited it from Attar.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Hayrat: bewildermenthayrat
Bewilderment or perplexity (*hayrat*) is for Attar not a failure of knowledge but a necessary stage of the path. In the *Mantiq al-tayr* it is the sixth valley, where the wayfarer, dazzled by the Beloved's beauty, no longer knows whether he exists or not, whether he is inside or outside, lover or beloved. In the *Musibat-nama* the whole poem dramatises inner bewilderment and restlessness: the wayfarer questions forty beings of heaven and earth and all reply that they are as lost as he is. The *Mukhtar-nama* devotes chapters to bewilderment and annihilation. Hellmut Ritter placed this experience at the centre of his study of Attar's 'ocean of the soul'.

A concept present in Islamic mysticism since Dhu'l-Nun and al-Junayd.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Faqr and fana: poverty and annihilationfana
The last of the seven valleys is that of poverty (*faqr*) and annihilation (*fana*): the wayfarer, stripped of everything, vanishes in the divine ocean like a drop in the sea, and only then can permanence (*baqa*) be spoken of. Attar insists that this is not destruction but transformation: in the *Ilahi-nama* he defines true alchemy as the passage of body into heart and of heart into pain, and in the *Musibat-nama* the Universal Soul asks the wayfarer to cast himself into the ocean of the soul and efface himself completely. The legend of his death, in which the poet declares himself worth less than a sack of straw, is the popular staging of this doctrine.

Classical Sufi doctrine formulated by al-Junayd and Bayazid; in al-Hallaj, hero of the *Tadhkirat*, it reaches its extreme expression.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Vidéos

Vidéos

Enregistrements, entretiens et documentaires. Les vidéos sont lues depuis YouTube ; elles ne sont pas hébergées ici.

  • The Long Journey Home | Attar's «The Conference of the Birds» | Spotlight

    Analyse· EN· 2022· 7 min

    The MetChaîne officielle

  • Attar's «Conference of the Birds» — The Greatest Sufi Masterpiece?

    Analyse· EN· 25 min

    Let's Talk Religion

  • Life-changing power of Attar's Conference of the Birds

    Entretien· EN· 3 min

    Sholeh WolpéChaîne officielle

  • La quête de l'Autre : «Le cantique des oiseaux» d'Attâr par Leili Anvar

    Conférence· FR· 2014· 59 min

    Résonance[s]

  • Et Dieu dans tout ça : «Le cantique des oiseaux» d'Attâr avec Leili Anvar

    Entretien· FR· 2012· 18 min

    Résonance[s]

  • Leili Anvar présente le livre d'art Le Cantique des oiseaux sur Public Sénat

    Entretien· FR· 9 min

    Éditions Diane de SelliersChaîne officielle

  • Lecture du Cantique des Oiseaux d'Attâr au Festival des Musiques Sacrées de Fès 2014

    Enregistrement de tiers· FR· 2014· 68 min

    Transcordancias | Global Music Live

  • Philosophie et Littérature — Attar : La Conférence des Oiseaux (Jeudis Philo)

    Conférence· FR· 106 min

    Ancrages Éditions

  • هفت شهر عشق عطار ۱ (Las siete ciudades del amor de Attar, 1)

    Conférence· FA· 26 min

    Dr Elahi Ghomshei — canal oficialChaîne officielle

  • دکتر الهی قمشه‌ای — آشنایی با عطار نیشابوری

    Conférence· FA· 2025· 39 min

    Majalle-ye farhangi-honari-ye Attar

  • حکایت نوشیروان و پیرمرد | الهی نامه عطار نیشابوری

    Enregistrement de tiers· FA· 28 min

    Rashid KakavandChaîne officielle

  • مختارنامه | رباعیات عطار نیشابوری

    Enregistrement de tiers· FA· 2026· 24 min

    Rashid KakavandChaîne officielle

  • La conferencia de los pájaros — Farid ud-Din Attar

    Analyse· ES· 2022· 3 min

    Universidad Externado de ColombiaChaîne officielle

Galerie

Galerie

Images dont la licence a été vérifiée. Chacune conserve son auteur et son attribution.

Manuscrits

Manuscrits

Témoins manuscrits et textes anciens, avec leur dépositaire et leurs conditions de consultation.

  • FA · Nastaliq · c. 1177 (texto)

    منطق‌الطیر (Mantiq al-tayr), manuscrito de Herat

    Témoin conservé
    Códice copiado en 892/1487 por Sultán Ali Mashhadi; pinturas timúridas y otras añadidas hacia 1600 por Habiballah de Saveh
    Dépositaire
    Metropolitan Museum of Art, Nueva York · 63.210
  • FA · Perso-árabe · s. XII–XIII

    خسرونامه (Khusraw-nama), copia de 1297

    Témoin conservé
    Manuscrito fechado en 1297 que contiene el romance y su prólogo atribuido a Attar
    Dépositaire
    Bibliothèque nationale de France, París
  • CHG · Uigur · s. XIII (original persa)

    تذکرة الأولیاء (Tadhkirat al-awliya), versión turca oriental en escritura uigur

    Témoin conservé
    Manuscrito de la Biblioteca Nacional de Francia traducido por Pavet de Courteille (*Tezkereh-i-Evliâ*, 1889-1890)
    Dépositaire
    Bibliothèque nationale de France, París
Manuscrits →

Relations

Relations

Influences, filiations et affinités. On distingue la relation documentée de la similitude identifiée par analyse.

  • A influencé

    Rumi

    Documented literary influence: Rumi adopted the metre of the *Mantiq al-tayr* for the *Masnavi* and reworked Attar's stories. By contrast, the meeting in Nishapur in which the aged Attar supposedly gave the *Asrar-nama* to the boy Rumi is a late legend: Ritter explained it by that work's influence on the prologue of the *Masnavi*, and Franklin Lewis considers it a succession myth (classification: hagiographic, no contemporary source).

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Al-Ghazali

    The frame story of the *Mantiq al-tayr* comes from the *Risalat al-tayr* ascribed to Ahmad Ghazali or to his brother Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali; Attar expanded and deepened the allegory.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Al-Hallaj

    Attar closes the *Tadhkirat al-awliya* with the life and martyrdom of al-Hallaj, whom he regarded as the perfecter of Sufism; the apocryphal *Jawhar al-dhat* and other 'second group' works make him their central figure.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Rabia al-Adawiyya

    Attar devotes a chapter of the *Tadhkirat al-awliya* to Rabi'a, the main source for many of her sayings and anecdotes in the Persian tradition, among them the prayer of disinterested love.

    Relation documentée

  • Contemporain de

    Ibn Arabi

    Contemporaries (Ibn Arabi was born in 1165 and Attar died around 1221), at the two ends of the Islamic world; no contact or mutual knowledge of their works is recorded.

    Relation documentée

  • Idées proches de

    Hafez

    Attar's *qalandari* ghazals, with their language of wine and the libertine, anticipate the figure of the *rend* that Hafez brought to its most refined form.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

  • Idées proches de

    Kabir

    Both teach that what is sought lies within the seeker and distrust outward religion; no historical connection is known.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

Sources

Sources

Bibliographie et catalogues consultés pour cette fiche.

  1. Wikidata, Q194091 «Attar of Nishapur» (P31=Q5; 69 enlaces entre wikis; P569 1145-03; P570 1221-04-26; P1559 فَریدالدّین ابوحامِد محمّد عطّار نِیشابوری).
  2. Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.
  3. Landolt, Hermann. «Farid al-Din 'Attar». En Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopaedia. Nueva York: Routledge, 2006; versión publicada por The Institute of Ismaili Studies.
  4. O'Malley, Austin. «An Unexpected Romance: Reevaluating the Authorship of the Khosrow-nāma». Al-'Usur al-Wusta 27 (2019), pp. 201–232. DOI 10.7916/alusur.v27i1.6785.
  5. «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource.
  6. Attar. Obras en persa: Diván, Mantiq al-tayr, Ilahi-nama, Asrar-nama, Musibat-nama, Mujtar-nama, Tadhkirat al-awliya y obras atribuidas (Pand-nama, Bulbul-nama, Ushtur-nama, Yawhar al-dhat, Mazhar al-ayaib, Haylay-nama, Bisar-nama, Waslat-nama, Si fasl, Bayan al-irshad, Nuzhat al-ahbab, Jusraw-nama). Ganjoor.
  7. «Attar of Nishapur». Wikipedia en inglés (mausoleo de Navai y su renovación de 1940; recepción moderna).
  8. FitzGerald, Edward. Letters and Literary Remains of Edward FitzGerald, ed. William Aldis Wright, vol. II. Londres: Macmillan, 1889 (incluye «Bird-Parliament» con la nota de E. B. Cowell sobre su génesis).
  9. Attar, Farid al-Din. The Tadhkiratu 'l-awliya («Memoirs of the saints»), ed. Reynold A. Nicholson, con introducción de Mirza Muhammad Qazvini. 2 vols. Londres y Leiden: Luzac / Brill, 1905–1907 (Persian Historical Texts).
Ayant droit
Dominio público (obra de los siglos XII–XIII). Las ediciones críticas (Shafii-Kadkani, Sukhan) y las traducciones modernas (Penguin, Norton, Islamic Texts Society, Paulist Press, Manchester University Press, Cerf, Diane de Selliers, Seuil, Fayard…) están sujetas a los derechos de sus editores y traductores.

En attente de confirmation

Ce que cette fiche n'a pas encore pu établir. Nous préférons le dire plutôt que de combler.

  • Sala de lectura en inglés: el *Bird-Parliament* de FitzGerald (dominio público) solo se ha encontrado dentro del vol. II de *Letters and Literary Remains* (archive.org/details/lettersliteraryr02fitziala, OCR limpio), que contiene otras obras; no se registra hasta hallar una página propia.
  • Sala de lectura en francés: la traducción de Garcin de Tassy (1863) está en Internet Archive con un OCR inservible (texto francés leído como persa); buscar una transcripción limpia (Wikisource o Gallica en modo texto).
  • No se ha encontrado traducción española del *Ilahi-nama*, del *Musibat-nama* ni del *Asrar-nama* en Open Library; confirmar traductor de las ediciones de Humanitas (2007), Troquel (1994) y de «72 santos sufíes» (Hastinapura, 2000), y si esta última procede del *Tadhkirat*.
  • Localizar ISBN de las ediciones críticas de Shafii-Kadkani del *Ilahi-nama*, *Asrar-nama*, *Musibat-nama*, *Mujtar-nama* y *Tadhkirat* (Sukhan).
  • Imagen: la miniatura de Hossein Behzad (1960) que usa Wikidata como retrato figura en Commons como dominio público por la ley iraní, pero el pintor murió en 1968; no se ha incluido por dudas sobre su situación en la UE.
  • Verificar con la edición impresa (Shafii-Kadkani, introducción al *Ilahi-nama*) la tesis de que el *Jusraw-nama* citado por Attar es el *Ilahi-nama*; aquí se apoya en Landolt (2006). Leer el artículo de O'Malley (2019), del que solo se ha consultado el resumen.
  • Comprobar el enlace de la ficha del Met (63.210) y la signatura del manuscrito de 1297 del *Jusraw-nama* en la BnF.
  • Vídeos en español de canales institucionales: solo uno (Universidad Externado de Colombia); faltan documentales de televisiones públicas.

Recherche effectuée le 2026-10-25