الانتقال إلى المحتوى
The ConsciousLibrary

الأبيقورية

Epicurus

Ἐπίκουρος

341 ق.م – 270 ق.مشخصية موثّقة تاريخيًا

فيلسوف يوناني (341–270 ق.م)، مؤسس مدرسة «الحديقة» في أثينا. جمع بين طبيعيات ذرية ورثها عن ديمقراطيس وأخلاقٍ تجعل اللذة، بمعنى انتفاء الألم من البدن والاضطراب من النفس، غايةَ الحياة. علّم ألّا يخاف الإنسان الآلهة ولا الموت، وأن يرعى الصداقة. ولم يبقَ من لفائفه التي بلغت نحو ثلاثمئة إلا ثلاث رسائل، ومجموعتان من الحِكَم، وشذرات من عمله الأكبر «في الطبيعة».

مؤلَّفًا
49مؤلَّفًا
طبعة
58طبعة
اقتباسًا
13اقتباسًا
مقطع فيديو
15مقطع فيديو
صورة
6صورة
Cabeza de Epicuro (Metropolitan Museum)

Cabeza de Epicuro (Metropolitan Museum) · CC0

بكلماته

«Let no one be slow to seek wisdom when he is young nor weary in the search thereof when he is grown old. For no age is too early or too late for the health of the soul.»

Carta a Meneceo, en Diógenes Laercio X 122. Griego: Diógenes Laercio X, ed. de Wikisource griega; inglés: R. D. Hicks (Loeb, 1925, dominio público); español: traducción propia.

فكرته المحورية

Pleasure (hedone) as the end: For Epicurus pleasure is "the beginning and end of the blessed life": the first good, innate in every living being, and the rule by which we judge each choice.

السيرة

4 دقيقة قراءة

ترجمة مُعانة من الأصل الإسباني، بانتظار مراجعة مترجم من أهل اللغة.

ثلاثمئة لفافة وثلاث رسائل

كان أبيقور من أغزر مؤلفي العصور القديمة إنتاجًا: إذ ينسب إليه ديوجانس اللائرتي نحو ثلاثمئة لفافة، ليس فيها استشهاد واحد بغيره. وقد ضاع كل ذلك تقريبًا. وما بقي لنا يصل إلينا من ثلاث طرق. فالكتاب العاشر من «سِيَر» اللائرتي ينقل كاملةً ثلاث رسائل — إلى هيرودوت وإلى فيثوكليس وإلى مينيكيوس — والأقوال الأساسية الأربعين ووصيّته. وطمرت السُّحب البركانية الملتهبة التي قذفها فيزوف سنة 79، في فيلا بهركولانيوم، مكتبةَ الأبيقوري فيلوديموس، وفيها لفائف متفحمة من رسالته الكبرى «في الطبيعة». وفي سنة 1888 ظهرت في مخطوطة من المكتبة الفاتيكانية مجموعة أخرى من الحِكَم. وحول ذلك تبقى أخبار الرواقيين والأكاديميين والمسيحيين، وكثيرًا ما تكون معادية، وأصداء أمينة لتلاميذ مثل لوكريتيوس.

ساموس وقولوفون وتيوس

وُلد سنة 341 ق.م في ساموس، حيث كانت أثينا قد أسكنت مستوطنين؛ وكان أبوه نيوكليس معلّم صبيان ومواطنًا أثينيًا من دائرة غارغيتوس، وأمه تُدعى خايريستراتي. وبحسب الأبيقوري أبولودوروس، اتجه إلى الفلسفة في الرابعة عشرة، ضائقًا بأن معلّميه عجزوا عن أن يشرحوا له ما «العماء» (الخاوس) عند هسيودوس. وفي الثامنة عشرة جاء أثينا ليؤدي خدمة الفتوّة العسكرية، حين كان كسانوقراطيس يعلّم في الأكاديمية وكان أرسطو قد اعتزل في خلقيس. وبعد موت الإسكندر طرد برديكاس الأثينيين من ساموس، فلحق أبيقور بأسرته في قولوفون. وعلى مقربة منها، في تيوس، استمع إلى الديمقراطي نوسيفانيس، صاحب كتاب «الحامل الثلاثي» الذي يقال إنه أخذ منه كتابه «القانون»؛ أما هو فأنكر ذلك دائمًا، وزعم أنه علّم نفسه بنفسه، وأمطر معلّمه القديم بالشتائم.

من بحر إيجة إلى الحديقة

في الثانية والثلاثين بدأ يعلّم في ميتيليني بجزيرة لسبوس، ثم بعد قليل في لامبساكوس على الهلسبونت، حيث جمع التلاميذ الذين سيرافقونه طوال حياته: ميترودوروس وبولياينوس وإيدومينيوس وكولوتيس وليونتيوس وزوجته ثيميستا. ونحو سنة 307 ق.م عاد إلى أثينا واشترى بثمانين مينا بستانًا، هو «الحديقة» (كيبوس)، الذي أعطى المدرسة اسمها. وكانت جماعة أصدقاء أكثر منها قاعة درس: يعيش فيها إخوته، ونساء مثل ليونتيون أو ثيميستا، والعبد ميس الذي كان يشارك في الدرس؛ يأكلون ببساطة، ويقنعون بالخبز والماء وقليل من النبيذ الممزوج، ولا يجعلون أموالهم مشاعًا، لأن ذلك، كما كان أبيقور يقول، يفترض انعدام الثقة بين الأصدقاء. وبعد قرون كان سينيكا يذكّر بالنقش الذي على الباب: «أيها الضيف، ستطيب لك الإقامة هنا؛ فهنا الخير الأسمى هو اللذة».

دواء للخوف

كان أبيقور يقسم الفلسفة إلى قانونيات وطبيعيات وأخلاق، ويُخضع الأوليين للثالثة: فلا معنى لدراسة الطبيعة إلا إن حررت من الخوف. فكل ما هو موجود ذرّات لا تنقسم تتحرك في الخلاء؛ والنفس أيضًا مركّب من ذرات يتفكك بتفكك البدن؛ والآلهة موجودة، لكنها تعيش سعيدة غير مكترثة، فلا تعاقب أحدًا ولا تثيبه. ومن هنا أشهر أقواله: الموت لا شيء بالنسبة إلينا، لأننا ما دمنا موجودين فهو غير موجود، وحين يوجد هو لا نكون نحن. واللذة مبدأ الحياة السعيدة وغايتها، لكنها ليست لذة المتهتكين، بل انتفاء الألم من البدن (أبونيا) وانتفاء الاضطراب من النفس (أتاراكسيا، أي الطمأنينة). وللوصول إليها ينبغي التمييز بين الرغبات الطبيعية الضرورية والرغبات الباطلة، والاختيار بحكمة عملية هي أثمن من الفلسفة نفسها. والصداقة أعظم خير تهبه الحكمة، والحياة المعتزلة — «عِشْ متواريًا»، كما سيلخّصها الأبيقوريون — تقي من الطموح ومن السياسة.

الإحساسات والذرات والانحراف

تذهب نظرية المعرفة، التي عُرضت في كتاب «القانون» المفقود، إلى أن الإحساسات كلها صادقة، وأن الخطأ ينشأ من الظن الذي نضيفه إليها؛ ومعها تكون التصورات المسبقة (برولبسيس) وانفعالات اللذة والألم معاييرَ الحقيقة. وتتبع الطبيعيات ديمقراطيس عن كثب، وكان أبيقور مدينًا له بأكثر مما يعترف، لكنها تفترق عنه في نقطة حاسمة: فلإنقاذ الحرية في وجه الضرورة، يمكن للذرات أن تنحرف عن مسارها انحرافًا ضئيلًا. وهذا الانحراف، الذي سمّاه اللاتين كليناميْن، لا يرد في نصوص أبيقور الباقية، وإنما نعرفه من لوكريتيوس وشيشرون، وإن كانت الرسالة إلى مينيكيوس تفضّل منذ ذلك الحين أساطير الآلهة على الضرورة الصارمة عند الطبيعيين، وتقرّر أن ثمة ما هو في وسعنا.

الافتراءات والمدافعون

لم تُفترَ على مدرسة قديمة كما افتُري على هذه. فقد روى تيموقراطيس، أخو ميترودوروس والمنشقّ عن الحديقة، أن أبيقور كان يتقيأ مرتين في اليوم من فرط الأكل، وينفق على مائدته مينا كل يوم؛ وأشاع الرواقي ديوتيموس خمسين رسالة فاحشة نُسبت إليه زورًا. وسمّاه إبكتيتوس داعيةَ الترف والتخنّث، وجعل آباء الكنيسة كلمة «أبيقوري» مرادفًا للملحد والمنغمس في الملذات. وديوجانس اللائرتي، الذي ينقل هذه التهم، يفنّدها بشهادة وصيّته، ووفاء أصدقائه، وتقشّف الحديقة. على أن أبيقور نفسه، والحق يقال، احتقر بلا هوادة أفلاطون وأرسطو والكلبيين والجدليين.

أسعد الأيام

مات سنة 270 ق.م، في الثانية والسبعين، بعد أربعة عشر يومًا من الألم بسبب حصاة كانت تمنعه من التبوّل، كما كان يروي خليفته هرمارخوس. وفي ذلك اليوم الأخير كتب إلى إيدومينيوس أنه يقابل آلام المثانة والأمعاء، التي لا يمكن أن تكون أشد، بفرح النفس بذكرى أحاديثهما، وأوصاه برعاية أبناء ميترودوروس. وأضاف كاتب السِّيَر هرميبوس أنه دخل حوضًا من البرونز فيه ماء فاتر، وطلب نبيذًا صرفًا، فشربه ومات بعد أن سأل أصدقاءه أن يذكروا تعاليمه. وفي وصيته ترك الحديقة للمدرسة، وأعتق عبيده ميس ونيكياس وليكون وفايدريون، وجعل لقاءً في اليوم العشرين من كل شهر إحياءً لذكراه وذكرى ميترودوروس.

العقب الطويل

بقيت الحديقة قرونًا على وفاء نادر لمؤسسها. ففي القرن الأول قبل الميلاد علّم فيلوديموس الأبيقورية في إيطاليا، وصبّها لوكريتيوس في الكتب الستة من «في طبيعة الأشياء»؛ وفي القرن الثاني للميلاد أمر ديوجانس الأوينواندي بنقش تعاليمها على جدار في مدينته بليكيا، ليقرأها من يشاء. ثم دفنتها المسيحية؛ وكان اكتشاف بوجيو براتشوليني لمخطوطة لوكريتيوس سنة 1417 بداية عودتها، وفي القرن السابع عشر وفّق بيير غاسندي بين الذرية الأبيقورية والإيمان، ووضعها في أصل العلم الحديث. واليوم، مع برديات هركولانيوم التي تُفكّ رموزها شيئًا فشيئًا، يبقى أبيقور الفيلسوف الذي قدّم السكينة بوصفها صنعةً تُتعلَّم.

المصادر: García Gual, Carlos. Epicuro. Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 1981. · Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342). · Diógenes Laercio. Los diez libros de Diógenes Laercio sobre las vidas, opiniones y sentencias de los filósofos más ilustres, trad. de José Ortiz y Sanz, tomo II (libros VI–X). Imprenta Real, Madrid, 1792 (Internet Archive). · Usener, Hermann (ed.). Epicurea. Teubner, Leipzig, 1887 (Internet Archive). Edición clásica de los textos y testimonios; numeración «Us.» de los fragmentos. · Bailey, Cyril (ed. y trad.). Epicurus: The Extant Remains. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1926 (Internet Archive).

الخط الزمني

الحياة عامًا بعد عام

كل نقطة حدث موثّق. انقر لتقرأه مع مصدره ودرجة اليقين فيه.

  1. 341 ق.م · أقل من عام

    Birth

    Born on Samos on the 7th of the month Gamelion in the third year of the 109th Olympiad, archonship of Sosigenes (January–February 341 BCE), according to Apollodorus' chronology in Diogenes Laertius X 14. Son of Neocles and Chaerestrate, Athenian citizens. Wikidata records 342 and 341. Years BCE are expressed as negative numbers.

    موثّق

  2. نحو 327 ق.م · 14 عامًا

    Hesiod's chaos

    By his own account he comes to philosophy at fourteen; Apollodorus the Epicurean says it was out of contempt for teachers who could not explain Hesiod's "chaos" to him (Diogenes Laertius X 2).

    تقليد

  3. 323 ق.م · 18 عامًا

    Ephebe in Athens

    Comes to Athens at eighteen for his ephebic service, when Xenocrates heads the Academy and Aristotle is in Chalcis (Diogenes Laertius X 1).

    موثّق

  4. نحو 321 ق.م · 20 عامًا

    Colophon and Nausiphanes

    With the Athenian settlers expelled from Samos by Perdiccas, he joins his father in Colophon. At Teos he hears the Democritean Nausiphanes, though he later denied having had teachers (Diogenes Laertius X 1, 13–14).

    مرجَّح

  5. نحو 311 ق.م

    First school

    Around 311 BCE—Laertius says at thirty-two—he begins teaching at Mytilene and then at Lampsacus, where Metrodorus, Polyaenus, Idomeneus, Colotes, Leonteus and Themista join him (Diogenes Laertius X 15).

    مرجَّح

  6. نحو 307 ق.م · 34 عامًا

    Return to Athens and purchase of the Garden

    Returns to Athens in the archonship of Anaxicrates (307/306 BCE) and buys for eighty minae the garden that gives the school its name (Diogenes Laertius X 2, 11).

    موثّق

  7. نحو 277 ق.م

    Death of Metrodorus

    Metrodorus of Lampsacus, his closest disciple, dies seven years before Epicurus (Diogenes Laertius X 23); the master's will provides for his children.

    مرجَّح

  8. 270 ق.م · 71 عامًا

    Death

    Dies in the second year of the 127th Olympiad, archonship of Pytharatus (271/270 BCE), aged seventy-two (ancient reckoning), after fourteen days of illness from a urinary stone. Hermarchus of Mytilene succeeds him (Diogenes Laertius X 15–22).

    موثّق

  9. نحو 150 ق.م

    The inscription of Diogenes of Oenoanda

    A citizen of Oenoanda, Diogenes, has a great inscription with Epicurus' doctrines carved on a stoa of his city, of which hundreds of fragments have been recovered. Approximate date (second century CE).

    موثّق

  10. 79 ق.م

    The Herculaneum library

    The eruption of Vesuvius buries the Villa of the Papyri and Philodemus' library, with rolls of Epicurus' On Nature; the papyri will be found carbonised in the eighteenth century.

    موثّق

  11. نحو 55 ق.م

    Lucretius, On the Nature of Things

    Lucretius composes in Latin hexameters the six books of his poem, the fullest surviving exposition of the Epicurean system.

    مرجَّح

  12. 1417

    Poggio finds Lucretius

    The humanist Poggio Bracciolini discovers a manuscript of On the Nature of Things in a German monastery and has it copied; the poem reintroduces Epicureanism into European culture.

    موثّق

  13. 1888

    The Vatican Sayings

    Karl Wotke publishes, with Hermann Usener's help, the collection of 81 Epicurean sayings he had found in the codex Vaticanus graecus 1950.

    موثّق

المؤلَّفات

المؤلَّفات الأساسية

المؤلَّفات التي لا يُفهم إرثه من دونها.

Letter to Menoeceus — Epicurus

مراسلات

Letter to Menoeceus

Ἐπιστολὴ πρὸς Μενοικέα

Epicurus' most widely read text: a short moral treatise in the form of a letter. It opens by urging philosophy at any age, since it is never too early or too late for the health of the soul; recalls that the gods are immortal and blessed and do not concern themselves with men; shows that death is nothing to us; classifies desires as natural and necessary, natural and unnecessary, and empty; defines pleasure as the absence of pain in the body and of disturbance in the soul, not the enjoyment of the profligate; places prudence above philosophy; and closes with the portrait of the sage, who lives "like a god among men".

10 طبعات · amazon.com

Letter to Herodotus — Epicurus

مراسلات

Letter to Herodotus

Ἐπιστολὴ πρὸς Ἡρόδοτον

A summary of Epicurean physics addressed to a disciple. It sets out the principles: nothing comes from nothing or perishes into nothing; the whole consists of bodies and void; compound bodies are made of indivisible atoms, of varied though not infinite shapes, moving ceaselessly at equal speed; there are infinitely many worlds. It explains perception through the images (eidola) that flow from things, the bodily nature of the soul and its dispersal at death, and ends by showing that the study of celestial phenomena serves to free us from fear, not to foretell.

9 طبعات · amazon.com

Principal Doctrines (Kyriai Doxai) — Epicurus

مجموعة لاحقة

Principal Doctrines (Kyriai Doxai)

Κύριαι δόξαι

The forty maxims condense the system into short formulas meant to be learned by heart. The first four contain the so-called "fourfold remedy": the blessed and immortal being neither has troubles nor causes them; death is nothing to us; the limit of pleasure is the removal of all pain; intense pain is brief and prolonged pain is bearable. Then come maxims on prudence and justice, on desires, on the security friendship brings and, at the end, a theory of justice as a compact neither to harm nor be harmed.

9 طبعات · amazon.com

Vatican Sayings — Epicurus

مجموعة لاحقة

Vatican Sayings

Ἐπικούρου προσφώνησις (Gnomologium Vaticanum Epicureum)

A collection of moral maxims at times more poetic and personal in tone than the Principal Doctrines. They include the most quoted sayings on friendship—"friendship dances around the world", calling everyone to wake to happiness—on gratitude for past goods, the simplicity of what is necessary, independence from fame and politics, and preparation for death. Together with the Principal Doctrines, it was the school's instrument for memorisation.

6 طبعات · amazon.com

On Nature — Epicurus

مؤلَّف مكتوب · نحو 300 ق.م

On Nature

Περὶ φύσεως

Epicurus' major work: a series of lectures in thirty-seven rolls that set out, completely and polemically, the physics, theory of knowledge and psychology of the system. The scholia to the Letter to Herodotus refer to it for the thesis that the whole consists of bodies and void or for the variety of shapes of worlds. The Herculaneum papyri, deciphered with difficulty since the eighteenth century and today with imaging techniques, preserve discussions of moral responsibility (Book XXV) and of language and error (Book XXVIII), in a dense style very different from that of the letters.

3 طبعات · amazon.com

الأقوال

أقوال محدَّدة الموضع في مؤلَّف بعينه. كل منها يحمل مصدره ودرجة الثقة به.

Let no one be slow to seek wisdom when he is young nor weary in the search thereof when he is grown old. For no age is too early or too late for the health of the soul.

Μήτε νέος τις ὢν μελλέτω φιλοσοφεῖν, μήτε γέρων ὑπάρχων κοπιάτω φιλοσοφῶν· οὔτε γὰρ ἄωρος οὐδείς ἐστιν οὔτε πάρωρος πρὸς τὸ κατὰ ψυχὴν ὑγιαῖνον.

متحقَّق منهCarta a Meneceo, en Diógenes Laercio X 122. Griego: Diógenes Laercio X, ed. de Wikisource griega; inglés: R. D. Hicks (Loeb, 1925, dominio público); español: traducción propia.

1 / 13
أقوال منحولة أو مختلَف في نسبتها (3)
  • «Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?»

    The so-called "Epicurean paradox" appears in no surviving text of Epicurus. Its source is the Christian apologist Lactantius (On the Anger of God 13, c. 314), who attributes it to Epicurus in order to refute it; many scholars think it comes from the sceptical Academy (Carneades) rather than the Garden, and the modern question form is owed mainly to Hume.

  • «I was not; I was; I am not; I do not care.»

    A Latin funerary formula (non fui, fui, non sum, non curo) attested in Roman epitaphs of the imperial age, Epicurean in inspiration. It circulates attributed to Epicurus, but it is not in his texts nor in Greek.

  • «The fourfold remedy: God presents no fears; death no worries; the good is easy to get; the terrible is easy to endure.»

    The doctrine is Epicurus' (Principal Doctrines I–IV), but the compact formula of the "tetrapharmakos" is by his follower Philodemus (first century BCE), in a Herculaneum papyrus. Presenting it as a literal quotation from Epicurus is inaccurate.

الكلمات الأخيرة

نسبة تقليدية

«"Remember the doctrines" (according to Hermippus, he bade his friends remember his doctrines and so died).»

τοῖς τε φίλοις παραγγείλαντα τῶν δογμάτων μεμνῆσθαι οὕτω τελευτῆσαι

Diogenes Laertius X 15–16 records the account of the biographer Hermippus (third century BCE): ill with a stone for fourteen days, he got into a bronze bath of warm water, asked for unmixed wine, drank it, bade his friends remember his doctrines and died. Laertius' own epigram puts in his mouth "χαίρετε, καὶ μέμνησθε τὰ δόγματα" ("farewell, and remember the doctrines"), a literary version. The most reliable testimony of his last hours is not spoken words but the last-day letter to Idomeneus (X 22), which Cicero knows as addressed to Hermarchus (De finibus II 96): "I write this on the blissful day that is also the last of my life…". English: R. D. Hicks; Spanish: own translation.

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

اسأل

بماذا يجيب أثره

اثنا عشر سؤالًا كبيرًا من أسئلة الإنسانية، وما تتيح نصوصه الإجابة به عنها، مع المراجع. ولا نقوّله ما لم يقل أبدًا.

  • ما المطلق؟ هل الله موجود؟

    The gods exist, happy and indifferent: they neither made the world nor govern it

    لا إله خالقيقوله صراحةً

    Epicurus is no atheist: in the Letter to Menoeceus he affirms that the gods exist and that knowledge of them is evident, and he defines them as incorruptible and happy beings. But precisely for that reason they cannot concern themselves with the world: the first Principal Doctrine says that the happy and incorruptible being neither has troubles nor causes them, and is subject neither to anger nor to favour. The cosmos is not their work but that of atoms combining in the void, and celestial phenomena must not be ascribed to their government. Human happiness therefore depends on no God: freedom from fear of the gods is one of the first remedies of his philosophy.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • من أنا؟ هل توجد ذات حقيقية؟

    The soul is a compound of atoms that disperses with the body

    لا توجد ذات دائمةيقوله صراحةً

    In the Letter to Herodotus Epicurus describes the soul as a body of fine parts spread throughout the organism, resembling breath with an admixture of heat, and adds that it cannot feel apart from the body's covering: when the body dissolves, its atoms scatter and it ceases to exist. To call the soul incorporeal, he says, is to speak idly. There is therefore no permanent self surviving the composition that forms it. Ethics rests on this physics: fear of death arises from imagining that we will still be there to suffer it, and vanishes once one understands that, the compound dissolved, nobody remains to be affected.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • لماذا نتألّم؟

    Empty desires and groundless fears disturb us

    التعلّق والشهوةيقوله صراحةً

    Epicurus identifies the good with pleasure, understood above all as absence of pain in the body and of disturbance in the soul, and explains unhappiness by two causes. The first is ill-ordered desires: some are natural and necessary, others natural and unnecessary, and others empty, like those for wealth or glory, which have no limit and are therefore never sated. The second is false opinions that breed fear, above all of the gods and of death. The Letter to Menoeceus teaches how to classify desires and weigh pleasures and pains, and physics dissolves the fears. We suffer by desiring what we do not need and fearing what should not be feared.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • ماذا يحدث بعد الموت؟

    Death is nothing to us: where it is, we are not

    الموت نهاية الشخصيقوله صراحةً

    Epicurus keeps no reserve: he states with confidence that death is the dissolution of the compound of atoms we are and that no one remains to undergo it. Hence his most famous argument, in the Letter to Menoeceus: good and evil lie in sensation, and death is the privation of sensation; so when we are, death is not, and when death is, we are no longer. The second Principal Doctrine reduces it to one line. The fear of death is thus an error, and its remedy is not a hope but physics properly understood. What matters is the quality of present life, not its length.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • كيف يُبلَغ التحرّر أو الخلاص؟

    Meditating day and night on the truths that heal the soul

    بالممارسة المنضبطةيقوله صراحةً

    For Epicurus philosophy is medicine for the soul, and its goal, ataraxia, is reached by sustained work. The Letter to Menoeceus begins by saying that no one is too young or too old to philosophise and ends with a watchword: meditate on these things day and night, by oneself and with someone like oneself, so as to live like a god among humans. The content of that meditation is fixed: the gods are not to be feared, death is nothing, the good is easy to obtain and pain easy to endure. The Principal Doctrines and the epitomes were written to be memorised. To this is added the study of nature, without which fears are not dissolved.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • هل نحتاج إلى معلّم؟

    The Garden: learning among friends, with someone like oneself

    الجماعة والتقليديقوله صراحةً

    Epicurus presented himself as self-taught and denied owing anything to his teachers, but the way he proposed is communal. In the Garden at Athens men and women, free and slave, lived together, united by friendship, which according to Principal Doctrine XXVII is the greatest thing wisdom provides for happiness. The Letter to Menoeceus recommends meditating on the doctrine alone and with someone like oneself, and the school cultivated the founder's memory with feasts and portraits. Seneca transmits an Epicurean counsel: choose a good man and keep him always before your eyes, acting as if he saw you. One learns in a community of friends and with its texts.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • هل العالم حقيقي؟

    Atoms and void: infinite worlds that arise and dissolve without design

    نظام طبيعي في تحوّليقوله صراحةً

    In the Letter to Herodotus Epicurus sets out an atomist physics: nothing comes from nothing nor is destroyed into nothing; the whole consists of bodies and void, and compound bodies result from indivisible and indestructible atoms in perpetual motion. There are infinite worlds, like and unlike ours, which form by aggregation and dissolve over time, without the gods' intervention or any purpose. The senses are reliable: they are the final criterion of truth, and what is not perceived is inferred from what is. The world is real, material and changing; knowing its natural causes is what frees from fears.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • ما الحب؟

    Friendship, the greatest good wisdom provides; falling in love, a risk

    إحسان منظَّميقوله صراحةً

    Epicurus carefully distinguishes erotic love from friendship. The first he distrusts: the sage will not fall in love, because love is not sent by the gods and usually brings more disturbance than pleasure. Friendship, by contrast, is at the centre of his ethics: of all that wisdom provides for happiness, by far the greatest is the possession of friendship. One Vatican Saying states that every friendship is desirable in itself, though it began in utility; another, that friendship dances around the inhabited world announcing to all to wake up to happiness. It is an affection cultivated with measure, among equals, sustaining the life of the Garden.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • هل نحن أحرار أم أن كل شيء مقدَّر؟

    What depends on us has no master: better myth than fate

    إرادة حرة حقيقيةيقوله صراحةً

    Epicurus is the first philosopher to state clearly the risk that a deterministic physics might cancel responsibility. In the Letter to Menoeceus he describes the sage as one who laughs at the fate some present as master of all, knows that some things happen by necessity, others by chance and others depend on us, and that what depends on us has no master, so that blame and praise follow from it. He adds that it would be better to follow the myths about the gods than to be enslaved to the fate of the natural philosophers. The doctrine of the swerve of atoms, known chiefly through Lucretius, was devised to save that freedom.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • لماذا نتأمّل أو نصلّي؟

    Honouring the gods without fear and repeating daily the truths that calm

    الطقس وتهذيب الذاتيُستنتج من تعاليمه

    Epicurus did not pray to the gods to obtain favours, because they do not intervene in the world, but neither did he abandon cult. According to Philodemus, he took part in civic festivals and the mysteries, and honoured the gods for their perfection, as models of an undisturbed happiness. His characteristic practice is another: the repetition of doctrine. The Letter to Menoeceus asks one to meditate on his teachings day and night, alone and with a friend; the epitomes and Principal Doctrines were composed to be memorised. Thus the truths that free from fear are fixed in the soul. Serene rite, repeated study and daily conduct make up the life of the Garden.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • هل يستطيع العقل أن يعرف الحقيقة القصوى؟

    No one is too young or too old to study nature

    الدراسة والتعلّميقوله صراحةً

    For Epicurus reason, resting on the senses, can know the ultimate constitution of things: atoms and void. His theory of knowledge, set out in the Canon, takes sensations, preconceptions and feelings as criteria of truth; what is not directly perceived is inferred from what is evident, provided nothing contradicts it. Philosophy is a lifelong task: no one is too young or too old to philosophise, begins the Letter to Menoeceus. And study has a practical aim: without knowing the nature of the universe it is impossible to dissolve fear about the most important matters. Learning is the way to serenity.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • الانسحاب من العالم أم تغييره؟

    Live unnoticed: the sage will not engage in politics, unless needed

    الانسحاب لكي نجديقوله صراحةً

    Epicurus advised standing apart from public life. The maxim “live unnoticed”, transmitted by Plutarch, who attacked it in a whole essay, sums up his position; Diogenes Laertius adds that the sage will not engage in politics, and a Vatican Saying urges freeing oneself from the prison of business and politics. The reason is that ambition for fame and power brings disturbance, and the security that truly matters comes from the quiet life and withdrawal from the crowd. But that withdrawal is not solitude: Epicurus founded the Garden, a community of friends living together on the outskirts of Athens. It is about withdrawing from the city in order to live with friends.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين

التقارب والتوتّر

التقارب والتوتّر

محسوبة سؤالًا سؤالًا انطلاقًا من مواقفه. وسبب كل اتفاق أو اختلاف يظهر بالنقر.

حكايات وروايات

حكايات وروايات

شهادةc. 307–270 a. C.

The Garden and its gate

When Epicurus returned to Athens around 307 BCE, he bought a garden outside the walls for eighty minae and settled there with his friends. It was a community without precedent: with the philosophers lived his brothers, women such as Leontion and Themista, and slaves such as Mys, who studied alongside the rest. They ate frugally, drank water and only a little watered wine, and did not hold property in common, because that, Epicurus said, would be a sign of mistrust among friends. Seneca, who admired him though a Stoic, relates that over the entrance one read: "Stranger, here you will do well to tarry; here our highest good is pleasure." And he adds that the keeper who welcomed you offered no banquet but barley porridge and plenty of water, and asked whether you had been well received: these gardens, he said, do not whet hunger, they quench it.

أصل الرواية: Diogenes Laertius X 3, 10–11 (citing Apollodorus and Diocles); Seneca, Letters to Lucilius 21.10. The inscription is Seneca's testimony, four centuries later, and there is no evidence that it was already there in Epicurus' time.

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

موثّقc. 307–270 a. C.

A little pot of cheese

Epicurus' opponents painted him as a glutton. He himself, in his letters, told another story: that he made do with water and plain bread, and in one of them he asked a friend: "Send me a little pot of cheese, that I may have a feast whenever I wish." Diogenes Laertius quotes the line as proof of who the man who taught that pleasure is the end of life really was. The Letter to Menoeceus explains it in theory: bread and water give the greatest pleasure to the hungry, and getting used to a simple diet gives health, removes fear of fortune and makes one enjoy abundance better when it comes now and then. The cheese is, in that logic, a calculated luxury.

أصل الرواية: Diogenes Laertius X 11, quoting verbatim a now-lost letter of Epicurus; the theory, in the Letter to Menoeceus (X 130–131).

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

مختلَف فيهs. III a. C. en adelante

The slanders of Timocrates

Timocrates, Metrodorus' brother, had been a member of the Garden and left it. In a book entitled Delights he claimed that Epicurus vomited twice a day from overeating, spent a mina a day on his table, had gone years unable to rise from his chair, and that he himself had barely escaped those secret night-time gatherings. Others added more: the Stoic Diotimus spread fifty obscene letters attributed to Epicurus; it was said that he and his mother went from house to house reciting charms, that he plagiarised Democritus and Aristippus, that he flattered the powerful. Diogenes Laertius records all this only to conclude that its authors were mad, and sets against it the evidence of the will, of the bronze statues his city dedicated to him and of the loyalty of his friends.

أصل الرواية: Diogenes Laertius X 3–9. These are accusations by opponents or by a deserter from the school, transmitted together with their refutation; no modern historian takes them as fact, but they show the hostility that surrounded Epicureanism from the start.

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

شهادة270 a. C.

The last day

Epicurus spent his last two weeks with a stone that blocked his urine, as his successor Hermarchus reported. On the day of his death he wrote to Idomeneus, one of his disciples from Lampsacus: he told him that he was spending that blissful day, which was also the last of his life; that the pains of bladder and bowels were so great that nothing could increase them, but that against them all he set the joy of the soul at the memory of their conversations; and he asked him, by the loyalty he had always shown to him and to philosophy, to look after Metrodorus' children. According to the biographer Hermippus, at the end he got into a bronze bath of warm water, asked for unmixed wine, drank it and died after bidding his friends remember his teachings. Cicero, who knew the letter addressed to Hermarchus, used it to mock the ethics of pleasure; for the Epicureans it was proof that the doctrine could be lived.

أصل الرواية: Diogenes Laertius X 15–16 and 22 (Hermarchus, Hermippus and the text of the letter); Cicero, De finibus II 96. The letter survives by quotation and its authenticity is not seriously disputed; the bath scene comes from a Hellenistic biographer fond of exemplary deaths.

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

تقليد شفهيc. 327 a. C.

Hesiod's chaos

Epicurus said he had come to philosophy at fourteen. The Epicurean Apollodorus, who wrote a life of the master, told how: reading with his schoolmaster Hesiod's line that "first of all Chaos came to be", the boy asked what chaos had come from, and since neither that teacher nor the grammarians could answer, he decided to find the answer himself. The biographer Hermippus gave another version: that he had been a schoolmaster and turned to philosophy on reading the books of Democritus. Both stories fit what came later: the principle that nothing comes from nothing and the debt, never fully acknowledged, to Democritus' atomism.

أصل الرواية: Diogenes Laertius X 2, with two versions (Apollodorus the Epicurean and Hermippus). It is a school anecdote, transmitted by a sympathetic biographer; its value is illustrative rather than documentary.

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

موثّق1417–1888

How Epicurus came back

For more than a thousand years, all that remained of Epicurus was Book X of Diogenes Laertius and his enemies' caricatures. His return was the work of chance. In 1417 the humanist Poggio Bracciolini found a manuscript of Lucretius' poem in a German monastery and had it copied. In the eighteenth century the excavations at Herculaneum brought to light a library of carbonised rolls, that of the Epicurean Philodemus, with books of On Nature still being deciphered today. In the late nineteenth century the blocks of the huge inscription in which one Diogenes, in the second century, had had the doctrines of the Garden carved for his fellow citizens appeared at Oenoanda in Lycia. And in 1888 Karl Wotke found in the Vatican Library the eighty-one sayings that have been called Vatican ever since.

أصل الرواية: Greenblatt (2011) for the finding of Lucretius; Konstan (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) for Herculaneum and Oenoanda; Wotke (1888) for the Vatican Sayings. These are well-documented facts of the history of transmission.

المصدر: Konstan, David. «Epicurus». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta; primera publicación 2005, revisión sustancial del 8 de julio de 2022.

التعاليم

التعاليم

المفاهيم التي ينتظم بها فكره، مشروحة في سياقها.

Pleasure (hedone) as the endhedone
For Epicurus pleasure is "the beginning and end of the blessed life": the first good, innate in every living being, and the rule by which we judge each choice. But his idea of pleasure is almost the opposite of what the name of his school came to suggest. The highest pleasure is not excitement but the absence of pain: the limit of pleasure is the removal of all suffering (Principal Doctrine III), and once reached it cannot increase, only vary. Hence the distinction, which Laertius attributes to Epicurus against the Cyrenaics, between pleasures "in motion", such as eating when hungry, and "static" or katastematic pleasures, such as the state of one no longer hungry or troubled. Ethics is a calculation: sometimes one forgoes a pleasure that brings greater harm and accepts a pain that brings a greater good. And that calculation requires prudence, which Epicurus values above philosophy itself.

Letter to Menoeceus (X 128–132), Principal Doctrines III–V and Diogenes Laertius X 136. The confusion with vulgar hedonism began with his Stoic and Christian opponents.

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

Ataraxia and aponiaataraxia
The two names of static pleasure are *aponia*, absence of pain in the body, and *ataraxia*, absence of disturbance in the soul. The second is the more important, because the soul suffers not only from the present but from past and future, and above all from false opinions: fear of the gods, fear of death, desire for what is not needed. Epicurean physics and theology serve above all to remove these fears, and the Letter to Pythocles itself warns that the study of the heavens has no other end than tranquillity. Ataraxia is not apathy: the sage feels pain, mourns his friends and cries out on the rack, according to Laertius, but keeps his serenity because he knows that intense pain is brief and prolonged pain bearable.

Letter to Menoeceus (X 128, 131), Letter to Pythocles (X 85), Principal Doctrine IV, Diogenes Laertius X 118. The term was shared by Sceptics and Epicureans, with different meanings.

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

The classification of desiresdeseos
Epicurus distinguishes three kinds of desire. The natural and necessary, like drinking when thirsty, are those that remove a pain and are easy to satisfy. The natural but unnecessary, like the desire for refined food, only vary pleasure without increasing it. And the empty, neither natural nor necessary, like craving for wealth, honours or power, arise from empty opinions and have no limit, since nothing sates them. The key to happiness lies in recognising this difference: what is natural is easy to get and has a limit; what is empty is inexhaustible. Hence the frugality of the Garden, which is not ascetic renunciation but strategy: whoever is content with little enjoys the little more and fears fortune less.

Letter to Menoeceus (X 127–131), Principal Doctrines XV, XXVI, XXIX–XXX and the scholion to XXIX (X 149).

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

The fourfold remedy (tetrapharmakos)tetrafarmaco
The first four Principal Doctrines form a compendium of Epicurean ethics that the school later called the "fourfold remedy". First: the blessed and immortal being has no troubles and causes none, so the gods are not to be feared. Second: death is nothing to us, for what has dissolved has no feeling. Third: the limit of pleasure is the removal of all pain, so the good is easy to attain. Fourth: intense pain is brief and prolonged pain bearable, so evil is easy to endure. The formula condensed into four short phrases is Philodemus', in a Herculaneum papyrus, but the content is the master's. It answers to the Epicurean idea of philosophy as medicine of the soul: arguments memorised so as to have them to hand at the moment of fear.

Principal Doctrines I–IV (Diogenes Laertius X 139–140); Philodemus, PHerc. 1005; Long and Sedley (1987), ch. 25.

المصدر: Long, A. A. y Sedley, D. N. The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.

Atoms, void and the swerve (clinamen)atomismo
Epicurus' physics starts from the principles that nothing comes from nothing or perishes into nothing, and that the whole consists of bodies and void. Compound bodies result from the union of atoms, indivisible and indestructible particles of definite shape, size and weight, infinite in number, moving ceaselessly at equal speed through an equally infinite void. There are infinitely many worlds that come into being and perish. The soul is a compound of fine atoms spread through the body, which disperses at death. To Democritus, from whom he took the essentials, Epicurus added a piece known to us from Lucretius and Cicero: a minimal, uncaused swerve of the atoms, which explains how they collide and form bodies and breaks the chain of necessity, leaving room for freedom.

Letter to Herodotus (X 38–68); Lucretius II 216–293; Cicero, On Fate and De finibus I. The swerve does not appear in Epicurus' surviving texts.

المصدر: Konstan, David. «Epicurus». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta; primera publicación 2005, revisión sustancial del 8 de julio de 2022.

The canon: criteria of truthcanon
The "canonic" is the Epicurean theory of knowledge, set out in the lost Canon. There are three criteria of truth: sensations, preconceptions (*prolepseis*) and the feelings of pleasure and pain. All sensations are true, because they are real effects of the images flowing from things; error arises from the opinion we add to them, for instance by judging without waiting to see up close. Preconceptions are general notions formed by repeated experience—the shape of a man or a horse—without which we could name or investigate nothing. For what is not seen directly, like atoms or celestial phenomena, the rule of non-contradiction with what is evident applies: explanations not refuted by the visible are accepted.

Diogenes Laertius X 31–34; Letter to Herodotus (X 37–38, 50–52).

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

Friendship (philia) and "live unnoticed"philia
Of all that wisdom provides for happiness, the greatest is friendship (Principal Doctrine XXVII). Epicurus grounds it in utility—friends give security in an uncertain world—but the Vatican Sayings raise it to a good desirable in itself and even say that the sage will suffer for a friend under torture as for himself. The community of the Garden was its practical realisation. Its complement is retirement: the sage will not engage in politics unless necessary, because ambition and fame bring disturbance, and the motto "live unnoticed", which Plutarch attacked in a whole essay, sums up that attitude. It is not indifference to others but the choice of a circle of friends over the crowd.

Principal Doctrines XXVII–XXVIII; Vatican Sayings 23, 52 and 56–57; Diogenes Laertius X 119; Plutarch, Moralia 1128a–1130e.

المصدر: Konstan, David. «Epicurus». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta; primera publicación 2005, revisión sustancial del 8 de julio de 2022.

Epicurus' godsdioses-epicureos
Epicurus was not an atheist. He held that the gods exist, since all peoples have a clear preconception of them, and that they are immortal and perfectly happy beings, of human form and made of very fine atoms. But precisely because they are happy they do not concern themselves with the world: they did not create it, do not govern it, neither grow angry nor grant favours, since all that would imply weakness and care (Principal Doctrine I). Popular religion is impious, said the Letter to Menoeceus, not for denying the gods but for attributing to them what does not befit them. The gods are a model of the happy life that the sage can imitate and contemplate without fear. Lucretius and Cicero add that they live in the spaces between the worlds, the *intermundia*.

Letter to Menoeceus (X 123–124), Principal Doctrine I and its scholion (X 139); Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods I.

المصدر: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).

مقاطع الفيديو

مقاطع الفيديو

تسجيلات ومقابلات وأفلام وثائقية. تُشغَّل مقاطع الفيديو من YouTube؛ ولا تُستضاف هنا.

  • La filosofía helenista (II): Los epicúreos · La March

    محاضرة· ES· 2022· 53 min

    Fundación Juan Marchالقناة الرسمية

  • 13ª . 14ª. La Filosofía de Epicuro y su escuela

    محاضرة· ES· 2022· 114 min

    Fundación Universitaria Españolaالقناة الرسمية

  • "La biblioteca de los papiros de Herculano y el gran muro epicúreo de Enoanda", C. García Gual

    محاضرة· ES· 2016· 65 min

    GipuzkoaKulturaالقناة الرسمية

  • La filosofía helenística (I) · La March

    محاضرة· ES· 2022· 57 min

    Fundación Juan Marchالقناة الرسمية

  • Diógenes, Epicuro y Crisipo | Historia de la filosofía (8/61)

    محاضرة· ES· 2017· 87 min

    Ernesto Castro

  • Cynics, Stoics, Epicureans

    محاضرة· EN· 2021· 46 min

    Gresham Collegeالقناة الرسمية

  • A History of Philosophy | 15 Epicurean Philosophy

    محاضرة· EN· 2015· 63 min

    wheatoncollegeالقناة الرسمية

  • Epicureanism - David Sedley, Angie Hobbs, James Warren

    فيلم وثائقي· EN· 2021· 42 min

    PhilosophyHub

  • Stoics vs. Skeptics vs. Epicureans | AA Long on Hellenistic Philosophy

    مقابلة· EN· 2025· 86 min

    Johnathan Bi

  • Catherine Wilson - How To Be an Epicurean

    محاضرة· EN· 2019· 43 min

    UNE Center for Global Humanitiesالقناة الرسمية

  • PHILOSOPHY - History: Epicurus’ Cure for Unhappiness [HD]

    تحليل· EN· 2014· 10 min

    Wireless Philosophyالقناة الرسمية

  • Epicurus and the Epicureans in the Ancient World | Philosophers in the Midst of History

    محاضرة· EN· 2020· 86 min

    Gregory B. Sadler - That Philosophy Guy

  • « Montaigne & Épicure : grandeur et limites de l'hédonisme » - André Comte-Sponville | ENS-PSL

    محاضرة· FR· 2016· 61 min

    École normale supérieure - PSLالقناة الرسمية

  • Ringvorlesung "Philosophie im Garten: von Epikur bis Foucault"

    محاضرة· DE· 2021· 71 min

    Uni Erfurt Liveالقناة الرسمية

  • Geschichte der Philosophie (5): Stoa, Epikureer und pyrrhonische Skepsis, Prof. Dr. Torsten Wilholt

    محاضرة· DE· 2013· 76 min

    InstPhilالقناة الرسمية

المعرض

المعرض

صور بترخيص متحقَّق منه. كل منها تحتفظ بمؤلّفها ونسبتها.

المخطوطات

المخطوطات

شواهد مخطوطة ونصوص قديمة، مع جهة حفظها وشروط الاطّلاع عليها.

  • GRC · Minúscula griega · Sentencias de los ss. IV–III a. C.; copia del s. XIV

    Gnomologium Vaticanum Epicureum (Ἐπικούρου προσφώνησις)

    الشاهد المحفوظ
    Único testimonio de la colección, dentro de un códice misceláneo.
    جهة الحفظ
    Biblioteca Apostólica Vaticana, Ciudad del Vaticano · Vat. gr. 1950
  • GRC · Mayúscula griega (papiro) · Obra de fines del s. IV–comienzos del III a. C.; copias de época helenística tardía

    Περὶ φύσεως (papiros de Herculano)

    الشاهد المحفوظ
    Rollos carbonizados de la biblioteca de Filodemo en la Villa de los Papiros, sepultada por el Vesubio en el 79 d. C.
    جهة الحفظ
    Biblioteca Nazionale «Vittorio Emanuele III», Officina dei Papiri Ercolanesi, Nápoles · PHerc. (varios números; p. ej. PHerc. 1479/1417 para el libro XXVIII)
المخطوطات →

العلاقات

العلاقات

تأثيرات وتلمذة وتقارب في الأفكار. تُميَّز العلاقة الموثّقة عن التشابه المستخلَص بالتحليل.

  • تأثّر بـ

    Demócrito

    His atomist physics derives from Democritus, whose books reportedly led him to philosophy according to Hermippus (Diogenes Laertius X 2); Epicurus played down the debt and called him "Lerocritus" (X 8).

    علاقة موثّقة

  • تلميذ

    Nausífanes de Teos

    Apollodorus names him as Epicurus' teacher; Epicurus denied it and insulted him (Diogenes Laertius X 7–8, 13–14).

    علاقة موثّقة

  • اختلف مع

    Plato

    Epicurus called the Platonists "toadies of Dionysius" and Plato "the golden" (Diogenes Laertius X 8); his physics and theology oppose those of the Timaeus.

    علاقة موثّقة

  • اختلف مع

    Aristotle

    He reached Athens when Aristotle was in Chalcis (X 1) and scorned him as a profligate who squandered his patrimony (X 8).

    علاقة موثّقة

  • اختلف مع

    Socrates

    There is no direct testimony from Epicurus about Socrates; his disciple Colotes attacked the Socratics, and Plutarch answered him in Against Colotes.

    تشابه مستخلَص بالتحليل

  • معاصر لـ

    Diogenes of Sinope

    Epicurus came to Athens as an ephebe around 323, the year Diogenes died; there is no record that they met. He called the Cynics "foes of Greece" (Diogenes Laertius X 8) and taught that the sage will not play the Cynic (X 119).

    تشابه مستخلَص بالتحليل

  • معاصر لـ

    Zeno of Citium

    Both taught in Athens at the same time, the Garden and the Stoa, from the late fourth century until Epicurus' death in 270; their schools were rivals for centuries (Diogenes Laertius VII and X).

    علاقة موثّقة

  • أثّر في

    Lucrecio

    Lucretius set out Epicurus' doctrine in De rerum natura and celebrates him as the liberator of humankind.

    علاقة موثّقة

  • اختلف مع

    Epictetus

    Epictetus repeatedly argues against Epicurus, whom he calls a preacher of effeminacy (Discourses I 23, II 20, III 7; Diogenes Laertius X 6).

    علاقة موثّقة

  • أثّر في

    Marcus Aurelius

    Though a Stoic, he quotes Epicurus approvingly on pain, which is neither unbearable nor everlasting (Meditations VII 64), and on his serenity in illness (IX 41).

    علاقة موثّقة

  • أثّر في

    Séneca

    Seneca quotes Epicurus in almost all of his early Letters to Lucilius and describes the inscription of the Garden (21.10).

    علاقة موثّقة

  • أفكار قريبة من

    Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha

    A frequent typological parallel: both conceive wisdom as therapy against the suffering produced by desires and false opinions, and seek a state of peace (ataraxia, nirvana); there is no historical contact.

    تشابه مستخلَص بالتحليل

المصادر

المصادر

المراجع والفهارس التي رُوجعت لهذه الصفحة.

  1. García Gual, Carlos. Epicuro. Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 1981.
  2. Wikidata, entidad Q43216 «Epicurus» (150 enlaces entre wikis; P31=Q5). Registra nacimiento en 342 o 341 a. C. y muerte en 270 a. C.; lugar de nacimiento, Samos; de muerte, Atenas.
  3. Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres, libro X (Epicuro: vida, testamento, cartas a Heródoto, Pitocles y Meneceo, Máximas capitales), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb Classical Library 185, 1925 (Wikisource en inglés); texto griego en Wikisource griega; trad. de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342).
  4. Diógenes Laercio. Los diez libros de Diógenes Laercio sobre las vidas, opiniones y sentencias de los filósofos más ilustres, trad. de José Ortiz y Sanz, tomo II (libros VI–X). Imprenta Real, Madrid, 1792 (Internet Archive).
  5. Usener, Hermann (ed.). Epicurea. Teubner, Leipzig, 1887 (Internet Archive). Edición clásica de los textos y testimonios; numeración «Us.» de los fragmentos.
  6. Bailey, Cyril (ed. y trad.). Epicurus: The Extant Remains. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1926 (Internet Archive).
  7. Arrighetti, Graziano (ed. y trad.). Epicuro. Opere. Einaudi, Turín, 1960; 2.ª ed. 1973 (incluye los libros de Sobre la naturaleza conservados en Herculano).
  8. Konstan, David. «Epicurus». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta; primera publicación 2005, revisión sustancial del 8 de julio de 2022.
  9. Inwood, Brad y Gerson, Lloyd P. (trads.). The Epicurus Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia, introd. de D. S. Hutchinson. Hackett, Indianápolis, 1994.
  10. Séneca. Epístolas morales a Lucilio 21.10 (inscripción del Jardín), c. 64 d. C. Texto latino en The Latin Library.
  11. Plutarco. «Si está bien dicho “vive oculto”» (Εἰ καλῶς εἴρηται τὸ λάθε βιώσας), Moralia 1128a–1130e, s. I–II d. C. Texto griego en Wikisource griega.
  12. Lucrecio. De rerum natura, s. I a. C. Trad. inglesa de William Ellery Leonard, On the Nature of Things, Dutton, 1916 (Project Gutenberg n.º 785).
  13. Long, A. A. y Sedley, D. N. The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
  14. Sedley, David. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
  15. Warren, James (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.
  16. «Epicurus», Wikipedia en inglés, y «Epicuro», Wikipedia en español (consultadas para contrastar datos y bibliografía; texto propio).
  17. Wotke, Karl. «Epikurische Spruchsammlung», con notas de Hermann Usener. Wiener Studien 10 (1888). Primera edición de las Sentencias vaticanas a partir del Vaticanus graecus 1950.
  18. Smith, Martin Ferguson (ed.). Diogenes of Oenoanda: The Epicurean Inscription. Bibliopolis, Nápoles, 1993.
  19. O'Keefe, Tim. «Epicurus (341–271 B.C.E.)». Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ISSN 2161-0002).
  20. Open Library (Internet Archive): ediciones de Epicuro y de Diógenes Laercio verificadas por ISBN.
  21. Marco Aurelio. Meditaciones VII 64 y IX 41 (numeración estándar; en la traducción de Casaubon, VII 35 y IX 41), c. 170–180 d. C. Trad. inglesa de Meric Casaubon (1634) (Project Gutenberg n.º 2680).
  22. Epicteto. Disertaciones recogidas por Arriano, I 23, II 20 y III 7 (polémica contra Epicuro), c. 108 d. C. Trad. inglesa de George Long (Project Gutenberg n.º 10661).
  23. Lactancio. Sobre la ira de Dios 13, c. 314 d. C. Trad. inglesa de William Fletcher, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. VII, 1886 (Wikisource en inglés).
  24. Greenblatt, Stephen. The Swerve: How the World Became Modern. W. W. Norton, Nueva York, 2011 (trad. esp. El giro, Crítica, 2012).
  25. Wilson, Catherine. Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008.
  26. Cicerón. Del supremo bien y del supremo mal (De finibus) I–II y Sobre la naturaleza de los dioses I, 45 a. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge (Project Gutenberg n.º 29247).
صاحب الحقوق
Textos antiguos en dominio público; cada traducción y edición moderna pertenece a su traductor o editorial

في انتظار التأكيد

ما لم تتمكّن هذه الصفحة من حسمه بعد. نفضّل أن نقول ذلك على أن نملأ الفراغ.

  • Tradiciones: el catálogo (content/traditions.json) no tiene «epicureísmo»; se asigna provisionalmente «secular-contemplative». Valorar dar de alta una tradición «epicureanism».
  • Traductores de las ediciones españolas de Cátedra (Obras completas, ISBN 9788437613307) y Tecnos (Obras, ISBN 9788430942572): no comprobados en catálogo; añadirlos cuando se verifiquen.
  • Arrighetti, Epicuro. Opere (Einaudi): no se ha localizado ISBN en Open Library; registrado sin ISBN.
  • Sentencias vaticanas: el texto griego de la n.º 52 se ha tomado de la edición corriente y cotejado solo en su comienzo; cotejar con la edición de Arrighetti. Localizar una traducción española de dominio público de las Sentencias vaticanas.
  • Manuscritos: verificar la digitalización del Vat. gr. 1950 en DigiVatLib (la URL probada devolvió 404) y los números de inventario de los papiros de Herculano de Sobre la naturaleza (libros II, XI, XIV, XV, XXV, XXVIII, XXXIV) con el Catalogo dei Papiri Ercolanesi.
  • Libros de Sobre la naturaleza conservados: se citan con seguridad el XV, el XXV y el XXVIII; confirmar la lista completa con Arrighetti y Sedley.
  • Programas de afiliación: ninguno verificado. Lista vacía.
  • Vídeos: el programa In Our Time de la BBC está subido por un canal no oficial; no se ha encontrado la versión oficial en YouTube.

بُحث بتاريخ 2026-10-25