सामग्री पर जाएँ
The ConsciousLibrary

यहूदी धर्म

Baruch Spinoza

ברוך שפינוזה

1632 – 1677ऐतिहासिक रूप से प्रमाणित व्यक्ति

बारूक स्पिनोज़ा (1632-1677) पुर्तगाली यहूदी मूल के डच दार्शनिक थे, जिन्हें 1656 में एम्स्टर्डम के यहूदी समुदाय से निष्कासित कर दिया गया और जिन्होंने लेंस घिसकर जीवन-यापन किया। उनके 'धर्मशास्त्रीय-राजनीतिक प्रबंध' (1670) ने आधुनिक बाइबल-आलोचना की नींव रखी और विचार की स्वतंत्रता का पक्ष लिया; 1677 में मरणोपरांत प्रकाशित 'एथिका' ईश्वर को प्रकृति से अभिन्न मानती है और ज्ञान के माध्यम से मुक्ति का मार्ग सुझाती है। एक शताब्दी तक नास्तिक माने गए स्पिनोज़ा बुद्धिवाद और उग्र प्रबोधन की केंद्रीय विभूतियों में हैं।

कृतियाँ
22कृतियाँ
संस्करण
74संस्करण
उद्धरण
12उद्धरण
वीडियो
15वीडियो
चित्र
10चित्र
Retrato anónimo de Spinoza (Wolfenbüttel)

Retrato anónimo de Spinoza (Wolfenbüttel) · Public domain

उनके अपने शब्दों में

«By God, I mean a being absolutely infinite—that is, a substance consisting in infinite attributes, of which each expresses eternal and infinite essentiality.»

Ética, I, definición 6 (trad. inglesa de Elwes)

मूल विचार

Deus sive Natura: God or Nature: The core of the Ethics is that there exists only one substance, absolutely infinite, which is cause of itself and of which everything else is a mode or affection: that substance is God, and it is also Nature.

जीवनी

6 मिनट का पाठ

स्पैनिश मूल से सहायता-प्राप्त अनुवाद, मातृभाषी अनुवादक द्वारा समीक्षा लंबित।

एम्स्टर्डम का पुर्तगाली समुदाय

बारूक स्पिनोज़ा का जन्म 24 नवंबर 1632 को एम्स्टर्डम के पुर्तगाली यहूदी समुदाय में हुआ। यह समुदाय उन 'कोन्वेर्सो' (ईसाई बनाए गए यहूदियों) के वंशजों से बना था जो इबेरियाई इन्क्विज़िशन से बचकर भागे थे और जिन्हें डच गणराज्य में खुलकर यहूदी धर्म में लौटने की स्वतंत्रता मिली थी। उनके पिता मिगेल एक प्रतिष्ठित आयातक व्यापारी थे, जो आगे चलकर 'तलमुद तोरा' मंडली के प्रबंधकों में शामिल हुए; उनकी माँ हन्ना देबोरा का देहांत बालक के छह वर्ष पूरे होने से कुछ ही सप्ताह पहले हो गया। बारूक ने समुदाय की पाठशाला में शिक्षा पाई, जहाँ उन्होंने हिब्रू सीखी, टीकाओं सहित तोरा पढ़ी और स्पेनी तथा पुर्तगाली में—जो उनके घर की भाषाएँ थीं—शिक्षा ग्रहण की। लगभग सत्रह वर्ष की आयु में उन्होंने पढ़ाई छोड़कर परिवार के व्यापार में हाथ बँटाना शुरू किया, जिसे आंग्ल-डच युद्धों ने चौपट कर दिया। 1654 में पिता की मृत्यु के बाद उन्होंने अपने भाई गेब्रियल के साथ कारोबार की बागडोर सँभाली।

1656 का हेरेम

27 जुलाई 1656 को मंडली के मुखियाओं ने तेईस वर्षीय बारूक के विरुद्ध 'हेरेम' घोषित किया—बहिष्कार का ऐसा दंडादेश जिसकी कठोरता का समुदाय में कोई पूर्व उदाहरण नहीं था। इसमें उन्हें दिन-रात, सोते-जागते शापित ठहराया गया और सबको मना कर दिया गया कि कोई उनसे बात न करे, उनका लिखा न पढ़े और चार हाथ से अधिक उनके निकट न जाए। दस्तावेज़ यह स्पष्ट नहीं करता कि उन पर किन "घृणित पाखंडों" का आरोप था; बाद की गवाहियों से संकेत मिलता है कि वे तब तक आत्मा की अमरता, तोरा के मूसा-रचित होने और इस्राएल के चुने हुए होने की धारणाओं को नकारने लगे थे। उन्होंने कभी अपने विचार वापस नहीं लिए, और न ही वह दंडादेश कभी हटाया गया। उनके पहले जीवनीकार, लूथरन पादरी योहानेस कोलेरुस के अनुसार उन्होंने स्पेनी में एक आत्म-रक्षा लेख लिखकर उत्तर दिया था, जो अब उपलब्ध नहीं है। उन्होंने न ईसाई धर्म अपनाया, न किसी चर्च से जुड़े; उस समय से वे अपने नाम के लातिनी रूप 'बेनेदिक्तुस' से हस्ताक्षर करने लगे।

लातिनी, देकार्त और मित्र-मंडली

कट्टरपंथी विचारों वाले पूर्व जेसुइट फ़्रांसिस्कुस फ़ान देन एंदेन की पाठशाला में उन्होंने लातिनी सीखी और देकार्त के दर्शन से परिचित हुए, जो आगे चलकर उनका आरंभ-बिंदु भी बना और सबसे बड़ा प्रतिपक्ष भी। वे कॉलेजियंट और असहमत मेनोनाइट लोगों के संपर्क में आए—ऐसे ईसाई जो किसी चर्च से बँधे नहीं थे और पादरियों के बिना धर्मग्रंथ पर चर्चा करते थे—और उन्होंने मित्रों का एक समूह अपने चारों ओर जुटाया: यारिख़ येलेस, पीटर बालिंग, लोडेविक मेयर, सिमोन दे व्रीस, योहानेस बाउमेस्टर और प्रकाशक यान रीवेर्त्स। ये लोग अपनी बैठकों में उनके दर्शन के मसौदे पढ़ते थे। लगभग 1658 में उन्होंने लाइडन विश्वविद्यालय में व्याख्यान सुने।

राइन्सबर्ग और फ़ोरबर्ग: लेंस घिसने वाला दार्शनिक

1661 में वे लाइडन के निकट राइन्सबर्ग में जा बसे, जहाँ सूक्ष्मदर्शियों और दूरबीनों के लेंस घिसकर जीविका चलाने लगे; क्रिस्टियान हाइगेन्स ने उनके काम की उत्कृष्टता की प्रशंसा की थी। वहीं उन्होंने अधूरा रह गया 'बुद्धि के परिष्कार पर प्रबंध' और 'ईश्वर, मनुष्य और उसके कल्याण पर लघु प्रबंध' लिखा; दूसरा ग्रंथ केवल उन्नीसवीं शताब्दी में दो डच प्रतिलिपियों के माध्यम से प्रकाश में आया। 1663 में उन्होंने अपने नाम से 'देकार्त के दर्शन के सिद्धांत' प्रकाशित किया, जिसके परिशिष्ट में 'तत्त्वमीमांसीय विचार' जुड़े थे—यही एकमात्र कृति थी जिस पर उन्होंने जीवनकाल में अपना नाम दिया। उसी वर्ष वे हेग के निकट फ़ोरबर्ग चले गए, जहाँ उन्होंने 'एथिका' पर काम जारी रखा और रॉयल सोसाइटी के सचिव हेनरी ओल्डनबर्ग से पत्र-व्यवहार किया।

धर्मशास्त्रीय-राजनीतिक प्रबंध

1665 में उन्होंने 'एथिका' का काम रोककर एक संघर्षशील ग्रंथ लिखना शुरू किया। 'धर्मशास्त्रीय-राजनीतिक प्रबंध' (Tractatus theologico-politicus) 1670 में गुमनाम रूप से और एक झूठे मुद्रण-स्थान के साथ प्रकाशित हुआ, जो उसे हैम्बर्ग में छपा बताता था। इसमें प्रतिपादित किया गया कि बाइबल को किसी भी अन्य ऐतिहासिक ग्रंथ की तरह, उसकी भाषा और संदर्भ के आधार पर पढ़ा जाना चाहिए; कि मूसा ने पंचग्रंथ नहीं लिखा; कि चमत्कार, यदि उन्हें प्रकृति के नियमों का उल्लंघन माना जाए, असंभव हैं; और कि सच्चा धर्म न्याय और परोपकार में सिमट जाता है। इसका राजनीतिक निष्कर्ष यह था कि राज्य का लक्ष्य स्वतंत्रता है, और दार्शनिक चिंतन की स्वतंत्रता न केवल शांति और धर्मनिष्ठा को हानि पहुँचाए बिना दी जा सकती है, बल्कि उन्हें नष्ट किए बिना छीनी भी नहीं जा सकती। सभी संप्रदायों के धर्मशास्त्रियों ने इसे एक नास्तिक की रचना कहकर निंदा की, और 1674 में हॉलैंड के न्यायालय ने इस पर प्रतिबंध लगा दिया। उनके मित्र आद्रियान कूरबाख़ का अंजाम—जो डच भाषा में लिखे ऐसे ही विचारों के कारण 1669 में कारागार में मरे—लेखक की सावधानी को समझाता है; उन्होंने अनुरोध किया था कि इस ग्रंथ का अनुवाद न किया जाए।

हेग: एथिका और सावधानी

1670 से वे हेग में रहे—पहले एक आवास-गृह में, फिर पाविल्योन्सख़्राख़्त पर चित्रकार हेंड्रिक फ़ान देर स्पाइक के घर में। उनका जीवन अत्यंत सादा था: कोलेरुस के अनुसार उन्होंने अपने मित्र सिमोन दे व्रीस का उत्तराधिकारी बनने से इनकार कर दिया और उनके परिवार द्वारा दी जाने वाली वार्षिक वृत्ति को पाँच सौ से घटवाकर तीन सौ गिल्डर करवा दिया; 1673 में उन्होंने पैलेटिनेट के इलेक्टर द्वारा हाइडेलबर्ग में प्रस्तावित दर्शनशास्त्र की पीठ भी अस्वीकार कर दी, इस आशंका से कि स्थापित धर्म में बाधा न डालने की शर्त उनकी स्वतंत्रता को सीमित कर देगी। वे आगंतुकों से मिलते थे—नवंबर 1676 में लाइबनित्ज़ ने उनके साथ कई दिन बिताए—और अपने पत्रों पर एक अँगूठी से मुहर लगाते थे जिस पर Caute शब्द अंकित था, अर्थात् "सावधानी से"। लगभग 1675 में उन्होंने ज्यामितीय क्रम में सिद्ध की गई 'एथिका' पूरी की, किंतु यह अफ़वाह फैलने पर कि वे ईश्वर के अस्तित्व को नकारने वाली कोई पुस्तक तैयार कर रहे हैं, उसे प्रकाशित करने का विचार त्याग दिया। इसके बाद उन्होंने एक 'राजनीतिक प्रबंध' और हिब्रू व्याकरण पर काम किया, जो दोनों अधूरे रह गए।

मृत्यु और मरणोपरांत कृतियाँ

21 फ़रवरी 1677 को चौवालीस वर्ष की आयु में हेग में फेफड़ों के एक रोग से, संभवतः क्षय रोग से, उनका देहांत हुआ, जिसे काँच की धूल ने और बिगाड़ दिया होगा। कोलेरुस ने फ़ान देर स्पाइक की स्मृतियों के आधार पर उनके अंतिम दिन का जो चित्र खींचा है, उसके अनुसार उस सुबह वे नीचे आकर परिवार से बातें करते रहे और दोपहर लगभग तीन बजे चल बसे; उस समय उनके पास एम्स्टर्डम के एक चिकित्सक के अतिरिक्त कोई नहीं था। 25 फ़रवरी को उन्हें नीउवे केर्क में दफ़नाया गया। मित्रों ने उनकी पांडुलिपियाँ सुरक्षित कर लीं और उसी वर्ष के अंत में, लेखक और मुद्रक के नाम के बिना, लातिनी में Opera posthuma और उसका डच अनुवाद De nagelate schriften प्रकाशित किया, जिनमें 'एथिका', 'राजनीतिक प्रबंध', 'बुद्धि का परिष्कार', व्याकरण और चुने हुए पत्र शामिल थे। 1678 में हॉलैंड की प्रांतीय सभा ने इन पर प्रतिबंध लगा दिया। 2010 में वैटिकन पुस्तकालय में 'एथिका' की एकमात्र ज्ञात संपूर्ण हस्तलिखित प्रति की पहचान हुई, जो 1677 में 'होली ऑफ़िस' (धर्माधिकरण) को सौंपी गई थी।

उत्तरकालीन प्रभाव

पूरी एक शताब्दी तक उनका नाम नास्तिकता का पर्याय बना रहा। 1785 में जर्मनी में छिड़े सर्वेश्वरवाद-विवाद ने उन्हें लेसिंग, हर्डर, गेटे, शेलिंग और हेगेल के लिए एक केंद्रीय संदर्भ बना दिया; नोवालिस ने उन्हें "ईश्वर में मदमस्त मनुष्य" कहा, और आइंस्टाइन ने स्पिनोज़ा के ईश्वर में अपनी आस्था घोषित की। आज उन्हें एक साथ बुद्धिवाद के महान व्यवस्था-निर्माता, आधुनिक बाइबल-आलोचना के संस्थापक और लोकतंत्र तथा सहिष्णुता के आरंभिक सिद्धांतकारों में से एक के रूप में पढ़ा जाता है, और यह बहस अब भी जारी है कि उनका Deus sive Natura ("ईश्वर अर्थात् प्रकृति") सर्वेश्वरवाद है, प्रकृतिवाद है या नास्तिकता का ही एक रूप।

स्रोत: Nadler, Steven. Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 (2.ª ed. 2018). ISBN 9780521552103. · Colerus, Johannes. Korte, dog waaragtige levens-beschryving van Benedictus de Spinosa. Ámsterdam, 1705; trad. francesa «La Vie de B. de Spinosa» (1706), en Œuvres de Spinoza, trad. Émile Saisset, t. II, París, Charpentier, 1861 (Wikisource). · B. d. S. Opera posthuma. [Ámsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz], 1677; y De nagelate schriften van B. d. S., trad. Jan Hendriksz Glazemaker, 1677. · Spinoza, Benedictus de. Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata (texto latino en Wikisource, a partir de la ed. bilingüe de Appuhn, Garnier, 1913); The Ethics, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (Londres, 1883), Project Gutenberg #3800. · Spinoza, Benedictus de. Tractatus theologico-politicus. «Hamburgi» [Ámsterdam], 1670 (texto latino en Wikisource, ed. Gebhardt); A Theologico-Political Treatise, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (1883), Project Gutenberg #989-992.

कालक्रम

जीवन, वर्ष-दर-वर्ष

प्रत्येक बिंदु एक प्रमाणित घटना है। उसे स्रोत और निश्चितता के स्तर सहित पढ़ने के लिए क्लिक करें।

  1. 24 नवंबर 1632 · 0 वर्ष

    Birth of Baruch Espinosa

    Born in the Jewish quarter of Vlooienburg, son of the merchant Michael de Espinosa and Hannah Deborah.

    प्रमाणित

  2. 1638 · 5 वर्ष

    Death of his mother

    Hannah Deborah dies, a few days before the boy turns six.

    प्रमाणित

  3. 1649 · 16 वर्ष

    Leaves his studies for the family business

    After the death of his brother Isaac he leaves the community school to work with his father.

    प्रमाणित

  4. मार्च 1654 · 21 वर्ष

    Death of his father

    He takes charge of the family firm, ruined by the Anglo-Dutch war, with his brother Gabriel.

    प्रमाणित

  5. 27 जुलाई 1656 · 23 वर्ष

    Herem of the Talmud Torah congregation

    The leaders of the Portuguese community expel him with a sentence of exceptional harshness that was never lifted.

    प्रमाणित

  6. लगभग 1657 · 24 वर्ष

    Latin with Van den Enden

    Studies Latin and Cartesian philosophy at Franciscus van den Enden's school; frequents Collegiants and Mennonites.

    संभावित

  7. लगभग 1658 · 25 वर्ष

    Classes at Leiden University

    Attends courses in Cartesian philosophy.

    संभावित

  8. 1661 · 28 वर्ष

    Settles in Rijnsburg

    Lives by grinding lenses; his surviving correspondence and the writing of the Short Treatise and the Ethics begin.

    प्रमाणित

  9. 1663 · 30 वर्ष

    Principles of Descartes' Philosophy; move to Voorburg

    Publishes under his name the geometrical exposition of Descartes and the Metaphysical Thoughts, and moves to Voorburg.

    प्रमाणित

  10. 1665 · 32 वर्ष

    Begins the Theological-Political Treatise

    Interrupts the Ethics to write a defence of the freedom to philosophise.

    प्रमाणित

  11. 1670 · 37 वर्ष

    Anonymous publication of the TTP; move to The Hague

    The book appears with a false imprint and provokes condemnations from theologians of every confession.

    प्रमाणित

  12. 20 अगस्त 1672 · 39 वर्ष

    Murder of the De Witt brothers

    According to Leibniz, Spinoza wished to post a placard with the words 'ultimi barbarorum' and his landlord prevented him by locking him in.

    संभावित

  13. 30 मार्च 1673 · 40 वर्ष

    Declines the Heidelberg chair

    Replies to Johann Ludwig Fabritius declining the chair of philosophy offered by the Elector Palatine.

    प्रमाणित

  14. जुलाई 1673 · 40 वर्ष

    Journey to the French camp at Utrecht

    Visits the headquarters of the invading French army; on his return, according to Colerus, the family fears a riot and he replies 'I am a good republican'.

    संभावित

  15. जुलाई 1674 · 41 वर्ष

    Ban of the Theological-Political Treatise

    The Court of Holland bans the book together with Hobbes' Leviathan and other heterodox writings.

    प्रमाणित

  16. 1675 · 42 वर्ष

    Gives up publishing the Ethics

    Finishes the work and abandons printing it amid rumours that he is preparing a book denying God.

    प्रमाणित

  17. नवंबर 1676 · 43 वर्ष

    Leibniz's visit

    Leibniz spends several days in conversation with him.

    प्रमाणित

  18. 21 फ़रवरी 1677 · 44 वर्ष

    Death

    Dies at about three in the afternoon of a lung disease; buried on 25 February in the Nieuwe Kerk.

    प्रमाणित

  19. दिसंबर 1677

    Opera posthuma

    His friends publish the Ethics and the unpublished works in Latin and Dutch.

    संभावित

  20. जून 1678

    Ban of the posthumous works

    The States of Holland ban the Opera posthuma.

    संभावित

  21. 1785

    The pantheism controversy

    The dispute between Jacobi and Mendelssohn over Lessing's alleged Spinozism revives his reading in German idealism.

    प्रमाणित

  22. 2010

    Discovery of the Vatican manuscript of the Ethics

    Leen Spruit and Pina Totaro identify codex Vat. lat. 12838, handed to the Holy Office by Niels Stensen in 1677.

    प्रमाणित

कृतियाँ

आवश्यक कृतियाँ

वे कृतियाँ जिनके बिना उनकी विरासत को समझा नहीं जा सकता।

Ethics, Demonstrated in Geometrical Order — Baruch Spinoza

मरणोपरांत कृति · 1677

Ethics, Demonstrated in Geometrical Order

Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata

His major work, set out like Euclid's geometry, with definitions, axioms, propositions, demonstrations and scholia, in five parts: God; the nature and origin of the mind; the origin and nature of the affects; human bondage, or the strength of the affects; the power of the intellect, or human freedom. It starts from a single infinite substance, God or Nature, of which all things are modes; denies free will and final causes; analyses the passions as natural phenomena arising from the striving to persevere in being; and proposes an ethics of joy and knowledge culminating in the intellectual love of God and the experience of the eternity of the intellect.

17 संस्करण · amazon.com

Theological-Political Treatise — Baruch Spinoza

लिखित कृति · 1670

Theological-Political Treatise

Tractatus theologico-politicus

A defence of the freedom to philosophise in twenty chapters. The first fifteen subject the Bible to historical and philological examination: prophecy as imagination, the election of the Hebrews as political prosperity, miracles as ignorance of causes, the authorship of the Pentateuch and the historical books, the method of interpreting Scripture by Scripture itself. The last five ground the state in natural right, identified with power, analyse the Hebrew theocracy and conclude that the end of the state is freedom and that everyone must be able to think what he wishes and say what he thinks. It is one of the founding works of modern biblical criticism and of liberal and democratic political thought.

9 संस्करण · amazon.com

Political Treatise — Baruch Spinoza

मरणोपरांत कृति · 1677

Political Treatise

Tractatus politicus

A treatise of political theory which, unlike the Theological-Political Treatise, leaves biblical exegesis aside and studies how monarchy, aristocracy and democracy must be organised so that peace and freedom do not depend on the virtue of rulers. It starts from the idea that human actions are to be understood, not laughed at, lamented or detested, and that each one's right extends as far as his power. It remained unfinished just as it was to deal with democracy, the form of government he considered most absolute.

5 संस्करण · amazon.es

Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect — Baruch Spinoza

मरणोपरांत कृति · 1677

Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect

Tractatus de intellectus emendatione

An essay on method that opens with one of the most famous autobiographical pages in philosophy: the experience that the goods men pursue—wealth, honour, pleasure—are vain, and the resolve to seek a true good that would give continuous and supreme joy. It distinguishes four modes of perception, analyses the true idea, fiction, falsity and doubt, and seeks the way to direct the intellect towards knowledge of nature. It is the most accessible way into his thought.

7 संस्करण · amazon.com

वचन

किसी निश्चित कृति में स्थित वचन। प्रत्येक के साथ उसका स्रोत और विश्वसनीयता का स्तर है।

By God, I mean a being absolutely infinite—that is, a substance consisting in infinite attributes, of which each expresses eternal and infinite essentiality.

Per Deum intelligo ens absolute infinitum, hoc est, substantiam constantem infinitis attributis, quorum unumquodque aeternam et infinitam essentiam exprimit.

सत्यापितÉtica, I, definición 6 (trad. inglesa de Elwes)

1 / 12
अप्रामाणिक या विवादित आरोपण वाले उद्धरण (2)
  • «'Even if I knew that tomorrow the world would end, I would still plant an apple tree today.'»

    Attributed to Spinoza and, more often, to Luther; it appears in no work or letter of Spinoza's, and for Luther too there is no source before the twentieth century.

  • «'God would say: stop praying and beating your breast; what I want you to do is go out into the world and enjoy your life…' (the so-called 'God of Spinoza')»

    A text spread on social media since the 2010s under the title 'If God Spoke' or 'The God of Spinoza'. It belongs to no work of Spinoza's: its style and personal theology (a God who speaks, loves and advises) contradict the Ethics, which denies that God has will or human affects. It is usually linked to Einstein's remark 'I believe in Spinoza's God'.

अंतिम शब्द

उनके अंतिम शब्दों का कोई सत्यापन-योग्य अभिलेख उपलब्ध नहीं है।

No reliable last words survive. Colerus, who questioned his landlords, relates that that morning he came down to talk with the family, took chicken broth at midday and died at about three in the afternoon, alone with a physician from Amsterdam whom he designates as 'L. M.' (later research usually identifies him with Georg Hermann Schuller). Colerus expressly denies that he said 'O God, have mercy on me, a miserable sinner' or asked for pastors to be kept away: no one in the house heard any such thing, and those repentance stories died out in the eighteenth century.

स्रोत: Colerus, Johannes. Korte, dog waaragtige levens-beschryving van Benedictus de Spinosa. Ámsterdam, 1705; trad. francesa «La Vie de B. de Spinosa» (1706), en Œuvres de Spinoza, trad. Émile Saisset, t. II, París, Charpentier, 1861 (Wikisource).

पूछें

उनकी कृतियाँ क्या उत्तर देती हैं

मानवता के बारह महान प्रश्न और उनके ग्रंथ उनका जो उत्तर देने देते हैं, संदर्भों सहित। हम कभी उनके मुख में अपने शब्द नहीं रखते।

  • परम सत्य क्या है? क्या ईश्वर है?

    God, or Nature: an infinite substance without will or ends

    निराकार परम सत्तास्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    Spinoza understands by God an absolutely infinite being, a substance consisting of infinite attributes, and demonstrates that apart from it no other can exist or be conceived: whatever is, is in God. This God is not a person. He does not act for ends or by a free decree of the will, but from the necessity of His nature, as its properties follow from the nature of a triangle. The appendix to the first part of the Ethics dismantles the image of a God who arranges the world for man and rewards or punishes, and the preface to the fourth states that the reason why God, or Nature, acts and exists is one and the same. The Absolute is the whole of reality understood in its necessity, accessible to the intellect and the object of an intellectual love that does not expect to be returned.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • मैं कौन हूँ? क्या कोई सच्चा आत्म है?

    The mind is part of the infinite intellect of God

    आत्मन् ही ब्रह्म हैउनके सिद्धांत से निष्कर्षित

    Spinoza denies that the soul is a substance: the human mind is the idea of an actually existing body and, as such, a finite mode of God's thought. From this he draws a consequence he states plainly: the human mind is part of the infinite intellect of God. Its actual essence is the striving (conatus) to persevere in its being. While it knows itself confusedly, it takes itself for a dominion within a dominion, free and independent; when it knows itself adequately, it knows that it is in God and is conceived through God. The fifth part of the Ethics adds that something of the mind is eternal, and that the intellectual love with which the mind loves God is part of the love with which God loves Himself. The true self is the one that understands itself from the Absolute.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • हम दुःख क्यों भोगते हैं?

    We suffer because we know the causes of our affects badly

    हम क्या हैं, इसका अज्ञानस्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    Spinoza calls bondage human powerlessness to moderate and restrain the affects: a man subject to them is not his own master but at the mercy of fortune. Sadness is the passage to a lesser perfection, and the sad passions — hatred, fear, envy, anxious hope — arise from inadequate ideas, that is, from knowing in a mutilated and confused way what affects us and what we are. That is why the remedy is cognitive: an affect that is a passion ceases to be one as soon as we form a clear and distinct idea of it. Understanding that everything happens necessarily gives the mind greater power over the affects and makes it suffer less from them. His maxim of method sums up the attitude: not to laugh at human actions, nor weep over them, nor detest them, but to understand them.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • मृत्यु के बाद क्या होता है?

    Something of the mind is eternal: not lasting afterwards, but outside time

    जो मैं हूँ, वह न जन्मता है न मरता हैस्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    Spinoza denies personal immortality as it is usually understood: the mind can imagine or remember nothing except while the body endures, so no memory or personality survives. But he affirms that the mind cannot be entirely destroyed with the body: something of it remains that is eternal, the idea that expresses the essence of this body under the aspect of eternity. That eternity is not an endless duration that would begin after death, but a way of being outside time, and it is experienced even now: we feel and know by experience that we are eternal. The more the mind understands by the third kind of knowledge, the greater the part that does not perish and the less it fears death. That is why the free man thinks of nothing less than of death.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • मुक्ति या उद्धार कैसे प्राप्त होता है?

    Freedom is born of understanding: happiness is virtue itself

    प्रत्यक्ष ज्ञान सेस्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    Spinoza calls by the same name freedom, blessedness or salvation: the constant and eternal love of God that is born of knowledge. The fifth part of the Ethics traces the way. First, reason orders the affects and weakens them by understanding their causes; then the third kind of knowledge, intuitive science, sees each singular thing in God and produces the greatest contentment of mind. From it arises the intellectual love of God, which does not expect to be returned and in which salvation consists. Happiness is not the reward of virtue but virtue itself: we do not enjoy it because we restrain our passions; we restrain them because we enjoy it. The way is hard, he admits, but all things excellent are as difficult as they are rare.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • क्या गुरु आवश्यक है?

    Neither prophets nor theologians: in speculative matters, reason alone judges

    कोई आध्यात्मिक सत्ता नहींस्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    The Theological-Political Treatise is largely a plea against spiritual authority in matters of truth. Spinoza shows that the prophets excelled in imagination and moral uprightness, not in philosophical knowledge, and that their opinions about nature bind no one. Scripture teaches only obedience, justice and charity; its interpretation belongs to each person by the natural light, without need of a caste of interpreters. That is why philosophy must not be the handmaid of theology, nor theology of philosophy, and the State must guarantee freedom to philosophise. Spinoza had teachers and correspondents, but in the Ethics the only guide is the order of the demonstrations, which anyone can follow and check.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • क्या संसार वास्तविक है?

    Everything follows necessarily from God: nothing is contingent, nothing is a miracle

    परिवर्तनशील प्राकृतिक व्यवस्थास्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    For Spinoza the world is real and governed by a seamless necessity. In nature there is nothing contingent: everything is determined by the necessity of the divine nature to exist and to act in a certain way, and things could not have been produced in any other manner or order. He distinguishes natura naturans, God as free cause, from natura naturata, the totality of modes that follow from it. The Theological-Political Treatise draws the consequence: a miracle understood as a violation of natural laws is impossible, because those laws are eternal decrees of God; what we call a miracle is an event whose cause we do not know. The world is neither appearance nor a stage for man: it is the very order of the real.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • प्रेम क्या है?

    Intellectual love of God and desire of the good for all men

    ईश्वर और पड़ोसी से प्रेमस्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    Spinoza defines love as joy accompanied by the idea of an external cause, and from there builds an ethics of love without sentimentality. Whoever loves God cannot strive for God to love him in return: the intellectual love of God, born of the third kind of knowledge, expects nothing back, and is part of the love with which God loves Himself. That love does not isolate: the good that whoever follows virtue desires for himself he also desires for others, and all the more the greater his knowledge of God. Towards others, reason counsels answering hatred with love and generosity, because hatred conquered by love turns into love, and that love is greater than if hatred had not preceded it.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • क्या हम स्वतंत्र हैं, या सब कुछ पूर्वनिर्धारित है?

    We think ourselves free because we ignore the causes; freedom is understanding

    जागने तक हम यंत्र हैंस्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    Spinoza denies free will: in the mind there is no absolute will; it is determined to will this or that by a cause, which is determined by another, and so on to infinity. Men believe themselves free because they are conscious of their desires and ignorant of the causes that determine them; in a letter he illustrates this with a thrown stone that, if it could think, would believe it moved by its own will. While man lives under the passions he is driven by external causes like the sea by contrary winds. But there is a true freedom: to act from the necessity of one's own nature alone, guided by reason. One is free not by escaping necessity but by understanding it.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • ध्यान या प्रार्थना क्यों करें?

    Not praying to change the order of nature, but understanding it

    यथार्थ को जैसा है वैसा देखनाउनके सिद्धांत से निष्कर्षित

    Spinoza does not pray in the usual sense: if God does not act for ends or change His decrees, asking Him to alter the course of nature makes no sense, and the Theological-Political Treatise analyses superstition as the child of fear and hope. What takes the place of prayer is meditation on life, not on death, and the exercise of understanding. In the Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect he tells how he resolved to seek a true good which, once found, would give continuous and supreme joy, and the Ethics identifies it with knowledge of the union of the mind with the whole of Nature. His practice is to see each thing in God, under the aspect of eternity, and in this he finds contentment.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • क्या बुद्धि परम को जान सकती है?

    The human mind has adequate knowledge of the essence of God

    अध्ययन और विद्यास्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    Spinoza is the most confident in this group in the power of reason. In the Ethics he demonstrates that the human mind has adequate knowledge of the eternal and infinite essence of God, and he distinguishes three kinds of knowledge: imagination, source of error; reason, which forms common notions; and intuitive science, which sees each singular thing in God. The ultimate is not beyond the mind: it is its supreme object. At the same time he separates philosophy from faith: in the Theological-Political Treatise he holds that Scripture teaches not speculative truths but obedience and charity, and that neither must theology be the handmaid of reason nor reason of theology. Knowing is a long road, requiring method and the emendation of the intellect.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें
  • संसार से हटें या उसे बदलें?

    The end of the State is freedom: a political order that lets people think

    समाज को व्यवस्थित करनास्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

    Spinoza led a retired life: he ground lenses, declined a chair at Heidelberg to preserve his freedom and lived soberly in lodgings in Rijnsburg, Voorburg and The Hague. But his philosophy does not counsel flight from the world. The free man sketched in the Ethics is freer in the State, where he lives by common laws, than in solitude, and nothing is more useful to man than another man guided by reason. His two political treatises seek the conditions of a just and stable order: the Theological-Political Treatise concludes that the end of the State is in truth freedom, and defends tolerance and freedom of expression. For Spinoza the philosophical life needs a well-ordered society, and thinking about it is part of his task.

    इस प्रश्न की अन्य गुरुओं से तुलना करें

निकटता और तनाव

निकटता और तनाव

उनके मतों के आधार पर प्रश्न-दर-प्रश्न आकलित। प्रत्येक सहमति या टकराव का कारण क्लिक करने पर।

इनसे मिलता-जुलता सोचते हैं

प्रसंग और वृत्तांत

प्रसंग और वृत्तांत

प्रमाणित1656

The herem

On 27 July 1656, from the reader's platform of the Talmud Torah synagogue, the sentence against Baruch Espinosa was read in Portuguese. The lords of the Mahamad declared that they had tried by various means to turn him from his 'evil ways' and that, in view of his 'abominable heresies' and 'monstrous deeds', confirmed by witnesses, they expelled him from the people of Israel. They cursed him by day and by night, lying down and rising up, going out and coming in, and ordered that no one should communicate with him orally or in writing, do him any favour, stay under the same roof or within four cubits of him, or read any paper made or written by him. No other herem in the community was so harsh, nor was this one ever lifted. The text, however, does not say what he had done or thought.

वृत्तांत का स्रोत: The text is preserved in the community's book of ordinances (Stadsarchief Amsterdam) and is edited and analysed by Nadler and Wikipedia; the reasons are a matter of conjecture.

स्रोत: Nadler, Steven. Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 (2.ª ed. 2018). ISBN 9780521552103.

विवादितc. 1656

The knife at the exit

Pierre Bayle related in his Dictionary (1697) that a Jew tried to kill Spinoza on his way out of a theatre performance, wounding him with a knife in the face, and tradition added that the philosopher kept the torn coat as a reminder. Colerus, who knew Spinoza's landlords, gives another version, which they said they had heard from his own mouth: one evening, leaving the old Portuguese synagogue, he saw someone approach with a knife and stepped aside in time; the blow reached only his clothes. The two versions differ in place and wound, and neither can be verified, but both reflect the violence of the conflict surrounding his break with the community.

वृत्तांत का स्रोत: Bayle, Dictionnaire historique et critique (1697), art. 'Spinoza'; Colerus, Life (1705), correcting Bayle from the Van der Spycks' testimony. The detail of the coat comes from later traditions.

स्रोत: Colerus, Johannes. Korte, dog waaragtige levens-beschryving van Benedictus de Spinosa. Ámsterdam, 1705; trad. francesa «La Vie de B. de Spinosa» (1706), en Œuvres de Spinoza, trad. Émile Saisset, t. II, París, Charpentier, 1861 (Wikisource).

साक्ष्य1672

Ultimi barbarorum

On 20 August 1672, in the midst of the French invasion, a mob lynched in The Hague Johan de Witt, Grand Pensionary of Holland, and his brother Cornelis, and tore their bodies apart. Spinoza, who admired De Witt's republican regime, wanted to go out at night and post near the site of the massacre a placard with the words 'ultimi barbarorum', 'the lowest of barbarians'. His landlord, Van der Spyck, fearing he too would be killed, locked the door and would not let him out. It is one of the rare moments when the philosopher of serenity lost his composure.

वृत्तांत का स्रोत: Leibniz records it in a note as something Spinoza himself told him during the 1676 visit; Nadler and the biographical tradition report it.

स्रोत: Nadler, Steven. Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 (2.ª ed. 2018). ISBN 9780521552103.

साक्ष्य1673

'I am a good republican'

In the summer of 1673, when Louis XIV's army occupied Utrecht, Spinoza travelled to the French headquarters, apparently at the invitation of the circle of the Prince of Condé, who was interested in his books; the prince had already left and they never met. On his return to The Hague a rumour spread that he was a spy, and his landlord feared people would storm the house. Colerus relates that Spinoza reassured him: he had nothing to fear, important people knew why he had made the journey, and if the mob gathered at the door he would go out to meet them even if they did to him what they had done to the De Witts, for he was a good republican and had sought only the glory and advantage of the State.

वृत्तांत का स्रोत: Colerus, Life (1705), from Van der Spyck's testimony. Stouppe's role and Condé's absence are recorded in Colerus and Lucas.

स्रोत: Colerus, Johannes. Korte, dog waaragtige levens-beschryving van Benedictus de Spinosa. Ámsterdam, 1705; trad. francesa «La Vie de B. de Spinosa» (1706), en Œuvres de Spinoza, trad. Émile Saisset, t. II, París, Charpentier, 1861 (Wikisource).

प्रमाणित1673

The chair he did not want

In February 1673 Johann Ludwig Fabritius, counsellor of the Elector Palatine Karl Ludwig, wrote to Spinoza offering him in his prince's name the ordinary chair of philosophy at the University of Heidelberg, with the fullest freedom to philosophise, provided he did not use it to disturb the publicly established religion. Spinoza took some six weeks to reply. He thanked him for the honour but declined: he had never wished to teach in public, teaching would take time from his own philosophy and, above all, he did not know within what limits that freedom should be confined so as not to seem to wish to disturb religion. He preferred, he said, his tranquillity.

वृत्तांत का स्रोत: Letters 47 (Fabritius, 16 February 1673) and 48 (Spinoza, 30 March 1673), published in the Opera posthuma.

स्रोत: Wikipedia (en), «Epistolae (Spinoza)» y «List of Epistolae (Letters) of Spinoza» (88 cartas: 50 de Spinoza, 38 de sus corresponsales).

साक्ष्य1671-1677

Spiders, a pipe and a single bed

Colerus gathered from the Van der Spycks the habits of their lodger. Spinoza sometimes spent whole days without leaving his room, ate little—gruel with raisins and butter, a little wine—and, when tired of meditating, came down to talk of anything with the family or smoked a pipe. For distraction he looked for spiders and made them fight, or threw flies into the web and watched the battle laughing out loud; he also examined insects under the microscope. When he won the lawsuit against his sisters over his father's inheritance, he left them everything except a bed. And at his death the inventory of his goods fitted into a few lines: books, prints, some polished glasses and the tools for polishing them.

वृत्तांत का स्रोत: Colerus, Life (1705); the detail of the inheritance and the bed also in Colerus. Indirect testimony of the landlords, gathered almost thirty years later.

स्रोत: Colerus, Johannes. Korte, dog waaragtige levens-beschryving van Benedictus de Spinosa. Ámsterdam, 1705; trad. francesa «La Vie de B. de Spinosa» (1706), en Œuvres de Spinoza, trad. Émile Saisset, t. II, París, Charpentier, 1861 (Wikisource).

प्रमाणित1676

Three days with Leibniz

In November 1676, on his way to Hanover, the young Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz stopped in The Hague and spent several days in conversation with Spinoza, to whom he had written years earlier about optics and whose manuscript of the Ethics he wished to see. They talked of philosophy and current politics, and Leibniz took notes, among them a proof of God's existence that he discussed with him. In public Leibniz always distanced himself from Spinoza and called him dangerous; in private he acknowledged the importance of the meeting, and his concern that his name not appear in the letters of the Opera posthuma shows how much it compromised him.

वृत्तांत का स्रोत: Documented by Leibniz's notes and correspondence and by Leibniz's 1671 letter to Spinoza published in the Opera posthuma.

स्रोत: Wikipedia (en), «Baruch Spinoza»; y (es), «Baruch Spinoza».

शिक्षाएँ

शिक्षाएँ

वे अवधारणाएँ जो उनके चिंतन को रूप देती हैं, उनके संदर्भ में समझाई गई।

Deus sive Natura: God or Naturedeus-sive-natura
The core of the Ethics is that there exists only one substance, absolutely infinite, which is cause of itself and of which everything else is a mode or affection: that substance is God, and it is also Nature. God is not a personal being who creates the world from outside by an act of will, but the infinite power expressed in all things by the necessity of its nature. The formula Deus seu Natura appears in the preface to Part Four: the reason why God or Nature exists and the reason why it acts are one and the same, and as it does not exist for an end, neither does it act for an end. He distinguishes natura naturans, God as free cause, from natura naturata, the modes that follow from him. Whether this is pantheism, panentheism, naturalism or atheism is the great dispute of his reception.

A radical reworking of the Cartesian notion of substance; it has disputed antecedents in Jewish mysticism and Giordano Bruno.

स्रोत: Spinoza, Benedictus de. Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata (texto latino en Wikisource, a partir de la ed. bilingüe de Appuhn, Garnier, 1913); The Ethics, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (Londres, 1883), Project Gutenberg #3800.

Substance, attributes and modesatributos-y-modos
Spinoza defines substance as what is in itself and conceived through itself; attribute as what the intellect perceives of substance as constituting its essence; mode as the affections of substance, which are in another and conceived through another. God has infinite attributes, of which we know two: thought and extension. Mind and body are not two substances interacting, as in Descartes, but one and the same thing expressed under two attributes: the order and connection of ideas is the same as the order and connection of things. Hence the human mind is the idea of the human body, and its power of thinking grows with the body's aptitude to be affected in many ways. This parallelism, as his interpreters called it, dissolves the Cartesian problem of the communication of substances.

Ethics, Parts I and II.

स्रोत: Spinoza, Benedictus de. Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata (texto latino en Wikisource, a partir de la ed. bilingüe de Appuhn, Garnier, 1913); The Ethics, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (Londres, 1883), Project Gutenberg #3800.

Conatus and the affectsconatus
Each thing, in so far as it is in itself, strives to persevere in its being, and that striving, the conatus, is its actual essence. In the human being, conscious of itself, it is called desire, and desire is the very essence of man. All affects derive from three primary ones: desire; joy, the passage to a greater perfection or power of acting; and sadness, the passage to a lesser. Love is joy accompanied by the idea of an external cause; hatred, sadness with the idea of its cause. Spinoza announces that he will treat human actions and appetites as if they were lines, planes or bodies, and from this comes a naturalistic psychology of the passions—hope and fear, envy, ambition, pity—that does not condemn them but explains their necessity. A thing is not good because we desire it: we desire it and therefore call it good.

Ethics, Part III; antecedents in Hobbes and the Stoics.

स्रोत: Spinoza, Benedictus de. Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata (texto latino en Wikisource, a partir de la ed. bilingüe de Appuhn, Garnier, 1913); The Ethics, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (Londres, 1883), Project Gutenberg #3800.

The three kinds of knowledgetres-generos-de-conocimiento
Spinoza distinguishes opinion or imagination, formed from vague experience and signs, the source of all falsity; reason, which knows through common notions and adequate ideas of the properties of things; and intuitive science, which proceeds from an adequate idea of the essence of certain attributes of God to adequate knowledge of the essence of singular things. He illustrates the difference with the problem of finding the fourth proportional of three numbers: one may know the rule by hearsay, deduce it from Euclid or see it at a glance. From the third kind arises the highest contentment of mind and the intellectual love of God, which is eternal. Falsity is nothing positive but a privation of knowledge.

Ethics, II, proposition 40, scholium 2; antecedent in the four modes of perception of the Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect.

स्रोत: Spinoza, Benedictus de. Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata (texto latino en Wikisource, a partir de la ed. bilingüe de Appuhn, Garnier, 1913); The Ethics, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (Londres, 1883), Project Gutenberg #3800.

Necessity, bondage and freedomlibertad-y-servidumbre
For Spinoza nothing in nature is contingent: everything is determined by the necessity of the divine nature. Men believe themselves free because they are conscious of their desires and ignorant of the causes that determine them, like a thrown stone that, if it could think, would believe itself free. Bondage is human impotence to moderate and restrain the affects, which drive us to see the better and do the worse. Freedom is not free will but acting from the necessity of one's own nature alone, that is, being guided by reason: an affect that is a passion ceases to be one as soon as we form a clear and distinct idea of it, and no affect can be restrained except by a stronger one. The free man does not think of death, seeks his true advantage, which coincides with that of others, and overcomes hatred with love.

Ethics, Parts IV and V; Letter 58 to Schuller (the stone that believes itself free).

स्रोत: Spinoza, Benedictus de. Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata (texto latino en Wikisource, a partir de la ed. bilingüe de Appuhn, Garnier, 1913); The Ethics, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (Londres, 1883), Project Gutenberg #3800.

Intellectual love of God and eternity of the mindamor-intellectualis-dei
The fifth part of the Ethics culminates in an affect that is not a passion: the intellectual love of God, the joy that accompanies knowledge of the third kind with the idea of God as cause. It is the same love with which God loves himself, and in it consist salvation, blessedness or freedom. Spinoza also holds that something of the human mind is eternal: not a personal immortality with memory and duration, which he denies, but the idea that expresses the essence of the body under the aspect of eternity. 'We feel and know that we are eternal.' Blessedness is not the reward of virtue but virtue itself, and the way to it, though arduous, can be found: all things excellent are as difficult as they are rare.

Ethics, V, propositions 21-42; the expression sub specie aeternitatis.

स्रोत: Spinoza, Benedictus de. Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata (texto latino en Wikisource, a partir de la ed. bilingüe de Appuhn, Garnier, 1913); The Ethics, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (Londres, 1883), Project Gutenberg #3800.

Freedom to philosophise and critique of Scripturelibertas-philosophandi
The Theological-Political Treatise separates philosophy, which seeks truth, from theology, which seeks only obedience, and holds that Scripture teaches neither science nor metaphysics but a simple moral doctrine: to love God and one's neighbour. To understand it he proposes interpreting the Bible by the Bible itself, as nature is studied, reconstructing the Hebrew language, the history of each book, its authors and its transmission; hence his conclusion that Moses did not write the Pentateuch and that Ezra compiled the historical books. In politics, he grounds the state in natural right, which he identifies with power, and concludes that the sovereign can regulate actions but not thoughts: the end of the state is freedom, and the freedom to think and to say what one thinks cannot be suppressed without harm to peace.

Theological-Political Treatise; antecedents in Hobbes, Ibn Ezra and Uriel da Costa.

स्रोत: Spinoza, Benedictus de. Tractatus theologico-politicus. «Hamburgi» [Ámsterdam], 1670 (texto latino en Wikisource, ed. Gebhardt); A Theologico-Political Treatise, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (1883), Project Gutenberg #989-992.

वीडियो

वीडियो

रिकॉर्डिंग, साक्षात्कार और वृत्तचित्र। वीडियो YouTube से चलते हैं; वे यहाँ संग्रहीत नहीं हैं।

  • Steven Nadler on Spinoza and the Herem

    व्याख्यान· EN· 68 min

    Institute for Tolerance Studiesआधिकारिक चैनल

  • Spinoza on the Divinity of Scripture | Prof. Steven Nadler

    व्याख्यान· EN· 73 min

    The Van Leer Jerusalem Instituteआधिकारिक चैनल

  • Spinozarede 2025 Steven Nadler

    व्याख्यान· EN· 2025· 58 min

    Stichting Spinoza Den Haagआधिकारिक चैनल

  • Steven Nadler, Spinoza and Menasseh..., Spinoza's Ethics... - 20-21 maggio 2019

    व्याख्यान· EN· 2019· 171 min

    SNS Humanities (Scuola Normale Superiore)आधिकारिक चैनल

  • The Philosophy of Spinoza & Leibniz - Bryan Magee & Anthony Quinton (1987)

    साक्षात्कार· EN· 1987· 44 min

    Philosophy Overdose

  • Why Study Baruch Spinoza with Agata Bielik-Robson

    व्याख्यान· EN· 12 min

    University of Nottinghamआधिकारिक चैनल

  • Spinoza, religio, and the re-conceiving of religion, God and Nature w/ Clare Carlisle

    साक्षात्कार· EN· 82 min

    John Vervaeke's Lectern

  • Spinoza | Por Darío Sztajnszrajber

    व्याख्यान· ES· 142 min

    Facultad Libre

  • Spinoza materialista. Gabriel Albiac

    व्याख्यान· ES· 61 min

    Cima & Holzenthal

  • El papel del Tractatus Politicus en la estructura de la Ética de Spinoza. Gabriel Albiac

    व्याख्यान· ES· 2024· 112 min

    Sociedad Filosofía Alicante

  • Diego Tatián: Spinoza y la filosofía de la liberación

    साक्षात्कार· ES· 39 min

    Canal Abierto

  • Grandes documentales: Baruch Spinoza y Gottfried Leibniz

    वृत्तचित्र· ES· 53 min

    ABC TV Paraguay

  • Gilles Deleuze : cours sur Spinoza n°1/14 (remasterisé en 2023)

    व्याख्यान· FR· 1980· 124 min

    Louis Simon

  • Pourquoi il faut relire Spinoza aujourd'hui

    साक्षात्कार· FR· 39 min

    France Cultureआधिकारिक चैनल

  • Spinoza | The Apostle of Reason, 1994

    YouTube पर देखें

    यह वीडियो एम्बेड करने की अनुमति नहीं देता; यह YouTube पर खुलेगा।

    Spinoza | The Apostle of Reason, 1994

    वृत्तचित्र· EN· 1994· 51 min

    STEFAN CLASSIC FILMS

चित्रशाला

चित्रशाला

सत्यापित लाइसेंस वाले चित्र। प्रत्येक में उसके रचयिता और श्रेय का उल्लेख सुरक्षित है।

पांडुलिपियाँ

पांडुलिपियाँ

पांडुलिपि-साक्ष्य और प्राचीन पाठ, उनके संरक्षक और अध्ययन की शर्तों सहित।

  • LA · Latin · c. 1675

    Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata

    संरक्षित पाठ-साक्ष्य
    Copia manuscrita completa anterior a la edición de 1677
    संरक्षक
    Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana · Vat. lat. 12838
  • NL · Latin · c. 1660-1662

    Korte verhandeling van God, de mensch en deszelvs welstand (códice A)

    संरक्षित पाठ-साक्ष्य
    Copia de finales del siglo XVII
    संरक्षक
    Koninklijke Bibliotheek, La Haya · 75 G 15
  • NL · Latin · c. 1660-1662

    Korte verhandeling van God, de mensch en deszelvs welstand (códice B)

    संरक्षित पाठ-साक्ष्य
    Copia de mediados del siglo XVIII, revisión de A
    संरक्षक
    Koninklijke Bibliotheek, La Haya
पांडुलिपियाँ →

संबंध

संबंध

प्रभाव, शिष्यत्व और वैचारिक निकटता। प्रमाणित संबंध को विश्लेषण से पहचानी गई समानता से अलग दर्शाया गया है।

  • इनसे प्रभावित

    Thomas Hobbes

    His theory of natural right as power and his biblical criticism engage with Leviathan.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इनसे मतभेद

    Maimonides

    The Theological-Political Treatise expressly criticises his method of accommodating Scripture to philosophy.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इनसे प्रभावित

    René Descartes

    His starting point: he expounded his Principles in 1663 and built his system in critical dialogue with him.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इनसे प्रभावित

    Uriel da Costa

    A relative on his mother's side; his heterodoxy and excommunication marked the community in which Spinoza grew up.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इनसे भेंट

    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

    Correspondence from 1671 and a visit of several days in The Hague in November 1676.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इनसे पत्राचार

    Henry Oldenburg

    Secretary of the Royal Society; his most frequent correspondent (1661-1676).

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इनसे भेंट

    Christiaan Huygens

    A neighbour at Voorburg; he praised his lenses and they discussed optics.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इनके शिष्य

    Franciscus van den Enden

    His teacher of Latin and modern philosophy in Amsterdam.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इनके समकालीन

    Johan de Witt

    Republican Grand Pensionary whose murder in 1672 outraged him; some biographers credit him with a pension from De Witt, which is unproven.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इनसे मिलते-जुलते विचार

    Estoicos

    An ethics of understanding necessity and of serenity before the passions.

    विश्लेषण से पहचानी गई समानता

  • इनसे मिलते-जुलते विचार

    Zeno of Citium

    Identification of God with the rational nature of the cosmos and life according to reason.

    विश्लेषण से पहचानी गई समानता

  • इनसे मिलते-जुलते विचार

    Meister Eckhart

    A mysticism of union with God through knowledge, in another theological frame.

    विश्लेषण से पहचानी गई समानता

  • इन्हें प्रभावित किया

    Martin Buber

    Critically discussed Spinoza's impersonal God from his philosophy of dialogue.

    विश्लेषण से पहचानी गई समानता

  • इन्हें प्रभावित किया

    Albert Einstein

    Declared in 1929 that he believed in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

  • इन्हें प्रभावित किया

    G. W. F. Hegel

    Declared that one is either a Spinozist or no philosopher at all; the pantheism controversy made Spinoza an interlocutor of German idealism.

    प्रमाणित संबंध

स्रोत

स्रोत

इस प्रविष्टि के लिए देखे गए ग्रंथ-सूची और सूचीपत्र।

  1. Nadler, Steven. Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 (2.ª ed. 2018). ISBN 9780521552103.
  2. Nadler, Steven. «Baruch Spinoza». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, publicado el 29-6-2001, revisión sustantiva del 8-11-2023.
  3. Wikidata, «Benedictus de Spinoza» (Q35802).
  4. Wikipedia (en), «Baruch Spinoza»; y (es), «Baruch Spinoza».
  5. Colerus, Johannes. Korte, dog waaragtige levens-beschryving van Benedictus de Spinosa. Ámsterdam, 1705; trad. francesa «La Vie de B. de Spinosa» (1706), en Œuvres de Spinoza, trad. Émile Saisset, t. II, París, Charpentier, 1861 (Wikisource).
  6. B. d. S. Opera posthuma. [Ámsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz], 1677; y De nagelate schriften van B. d. S., trad. Jan Hendriksz Glazemaker, 1677.
  7. Spinoza, Benedictus de. Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata (texto latino en Wikisource, a partir de la ed. bilingüe de Appuhn, Garnier, 1913); The Ethics, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (Londres, 1883), Project Gutenberg #3800.
  8. Spinoza, Benedictus de. Tractatus theologico-politicus. «Hamburgi» [Ámsterdam], 1670 (texto latino en Wikisource, ed. Gebhardt); A Theologico-Political Treatise, trad. R. H. M. Elwes (1883), Project Gutenberg #989-992.
  9. Spinoza, Benedictus de. Tractatus politicus, en Opera posthuma, 1677 (texto latino en Wikisource).
  10. Wikipedia (en), «Epistolae (Spinoza)» y «List of Epistolae (Letters) of Spinoza» (88 cartas: 50 de Spinoza, 38 de sus corresponsales).
  11. Spruit, Leen, y Pina Totaro (eds.). The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza's Ethica. Leiden: Brill, 2011. ISBN 9789004209268.
  12. Koninklijke Bibliotheek (La Haya), «Korte verhandeling van God, de mensch, en deszelvs welstand by Baruch Spinoza» (KB 75 G 15) y colección especial «Benedictus de Spinoza»; Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon, «Short Treatise on God, Man and His Wellbeing».
  13. Bayle, Pierre. Dictionnaire historique et critique, art. «Spinoza». Rotterdam: Reinier Leers, 1697.
  14. Lucas, Jean-Maximilien. La Vie de feu Monsieur de Spinosa (1719), en Œuvres de Spinoza, trad. Saisset, t. II, 1861 (Wikisource).
  15. Open Library, ediciones de Spinoza (Ethica, Tratado teológico-político, Tratado político, Correspondencia, Collected Works de Curley, Complete Works de Shirley, Opere de Mignini, etc.).
  16. Wikisource: «Scriptor:Benedictus de Spinoza» (la), «Auteur:Baruch Spinoza» (fr), «Author:Benedictus de Spinoza» (en) y «Autore:Baruch Spinoza» (it).
अधिकार-धारक
Dominio público (el autor murió en 1677). Las traducciones modernas pertenecen a sus traductores y editoriales.

पुष्टि की प्रतीक्षा में

जो यह प्रविष्टि अभी तक निश्चित नहीं कर सकी है। हम उसे भर देने के बजाय कह देना बेहतर समझते हैं।

  • Sala de lectura en español: no se ha localizado ninguna traducción española en dominio público con texto en línea. La Ética de Manuel Machado (Garnier, 1913) quedará libre en España el 1-1-2028 (murió en 1947); conviene buscar un texto digitalizado limpio para entonces.
  • Correspondencia completa en inglés (Elwes, 1883-1884) solo está en escaneos de Internet Archive y en sacred-texts.com, que bloqueó la consulta; verificar una fuente de texto limpio.
  • Principios de la filosofía de Descartes, Pensamientos metafísicos y Compendio de gramática hebrea: las páginas latinas enlazadas desde Wikisource no existen aún; buscar texto latino limpio (p. ej., ed. Van Vloten-Land o Bruder en Internet Archive, OCR por revisar).
  • Confirmar el año de muerte de R. H. M. Elwes (Project Gutenberg indica 1892) y la signatura del códice B del Tratado breve en la Koninklijke Bibliotheek.
  • Precisar el editor de la Hebrew Grammar de M. J. Bloom (Londres, 1963) y añadir ediciones con ISBN en ruso, hebreo y árabe (p. ej., el Tratado teológico-político traducido por Hasan Hanafi).
  • Relaciones con slugs fuera del catálogo (rene-descartes, thomas-hobbes, uriel-da-costa, gottfried-wilhelm-leibniz, henry-oldenburg, christiaan-huygens, franciscus-van-den-enden, johan-de-witt, estoicismo, albert-einstein, g-w-f-hegel).
  • Vídeos: no hay grabaciones de universidades o televisiones públicas españolas sobre Spinoza localizadas por la búsqueda; los documentales en español son divulgativos.

2026-10-25 को शोधित