Heraclitus

परम सत्य क्या है? क्या ईश्वर है?

A common logos and an ever-living fire that no god made

निराकार परम सत्तास्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

For Heraclitus the ultimate is the logos, the measure according to which everything happens, and the ever-living fire that is kindled and quenched in measures. Fragment B30 explicitly denies that any of the gods or of men made the cosmos: it always was, is and will be. The divine here has no face of craftsman or father. Yet Heraclitus does not abandon religious language: B32 says that the one, the only wise thing, is unwilling and willing to be called by the name of Zeus, and B67 calls god the unity of opposites, day and night, winter and summer, war and peace. It is an impersonal and intelligent principle that the traditional name of the god only half designates.

मैं कौन हूँ? क्या कोई सच्चा आत्म है?

The soul has no limits: its measure is the common logos

आत्मन् ही ब्रह्म हैउनके सिद्धांत से निष्कर्षित

Heraclitus says of himself that he searched himself (B101) and that it belongs to all humans to know themselves and to be sound of mind (B116). But what he finds in searching himself is not a private interiority: you would not find the limits of the soul though you travelled every road, so deep is its logos (B45). That logos is common to all, as thinking is common (B113), and the error of the many lies in living as if they had a private understanding (B2). The soul is moreover fiery and changing: it comes from water and dies into water (B36). His work suggests that the depth of the self coincides with the measure governing the cosmos, though he never states an identity.

हम दुःख क्यों भोगते हैं?

Sickness makes health sweet: whoever misses the logos suffers

हम क्या हैं, इसका अज्ञानउनके सिद्धांत से निष्कर्षित

Heraclitus devotes no fragment to the cause of suffering, but his work allows an attitude to be reconstructed. Opposites are inseparable: sickness makes health pleasant, hunger satiety, weariness rest (B111), and it would not be better for humans to get all they wish (B110). For god all things are beautiful, good and just; it is humans who have taken some things as unjust and others as just (B102). War itself is common and justice is strife (B80). Pain thus arises from a partial view: from those who do not grasp the logos although everything happens according to it (B1) and who live as if asleep.

मृत्यु के बाद क्या होता है?

At death things await humans that they neither expect nor imagine

मौन या संयमउनके सिद्धांत से निष्कर्षित

Heraclitus speaks of death in several fragments, always in his enigmatic style, and none offers a description of the beyond. B27 says that at death things await humans that they neither expect nor imagine; B62, that immortals and mortals live each other's death; B36 places the soul in the cycle of elements, for to souls it is death to become water. B25 promises greater portions to greater deaths, perhaps those of the fallen in battle. Together they suggest that death is one more transformation within the flux governed by the logos, and that what comes after does not match usual expectations; they do not allow us to affirm personal survival or to deny it.

मुक्ति या उद्धार कैसे प्राप्त होता है?

The wise is one thing: to know the thought that steers all through all

प्रत्यक्ष ज्ञान सेउनके सिद्धांत से निष्कर्षित

Heraclitus speaks not of salvation but of waking up. Humans live as if asleep, not understanding the logos although everything happens according to it (B1), and each turns towards a private world. The wise, says B41, is one thing: to know the thought that steers all things through all things. That understanding is not given by much learning, which did not teach Hesiod or Pythagoras (B40), but by listening to the logos and agreeing that all is one (B50). B112 joins knowledge and conduct: sound thinking is the greatest virtue, and wisdom is to speak the truth and act according to nature, heeding it. What frees is grasping the common measure.

क्या गुरु आवश्यक है?

Not to me but to the logos: borrowed learning gives no understanding

कोई आध्यात्मिक सत्ता नहींस्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

Heraclitus is perhaps the Greek thinker most hostile to the authority of recognised sages. Much learning does not teach understanding, says B40; otherwise it would have taught Hesiod, Pythagoras, Xenophanes and Hecataeus. Homer deserves to be thrown out of the contests and flogged, and Hesiod, teacher of most, did not know that day and night are one. He does not even claim authority for himself: it is wise, listening not to him but to the logos, to agree that all is one (B50). And against any school he sets his own method: I searched myself (B101). No one can grasp for another the logos that is common to all.

क्या संसार वास्तविक है?

Ever-living fire, kindled and quenched in measures

परिवर्तनशील प्राकृतिक व्यवस्थास्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

For Heraclitus the world is real and in perpetual transformation. B30 describes it as an ever-living fire kindled and quenched in measures, which no one made and which always was, is and will be. Upon those who step into the same rivers, other and other waters flow (B12): the identity of things holds through change, like that of the river. Opposites are joined in tension, as in the bow and the lyre (B51), and war is the father of all things (B53). But the flux is not chaos: the sun will not overstep its measures (B94). The real is the changing course of things, ordered by a logos to which the wise attune themselves.

प्रेम क्या है?

No fragment speaks of love; the uniting force is tension

इस पर कुछ नहीं कहा

Among Heraclitus' surviving fragments there is none devoted to love, either erotic or as goodwill. What joins things in his work is not attraction but the tension of opposites: what differs agrees with itself, a harmony of opposing tensions, as in the bow and the lyre (B51). War is the father of all (B53) and justice is strife (B80). Heraclitus even reproaches Homer for wishing strife would vanish from among gods and men, since without it there would be no harmony (A22). It would be forced to extract a doctrine of love from this; the closest is hidden harmony, which is better than the manifest (B54).

क्या हम स्वतंत्र हैं, या सब कुछ पूर्वनिर्धारित है?

Character is a human being's destiny

नियति और उत्तरदायित्वस्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

Heraclitus' most quoted fragment on this question is B119: character is a human being's destiny, his daimon. The sentence can be read in two senses that do not exclude each other: each person's destiny is not an alien power but is identified with his way of being; and, at the same time, that character works as a force that guides him. Elsewhere Heraclitus states that everything happens according to the logos (B1) and through strife and necessity (B80), and that the sun will not overstep its measures, for the Erinyes, helpers of Justice, would find it out (B94). There is an order governing everything, but the centre of gravity of human destiny lies in conduct.

ध्यान या प्रार्थना क्यों करें?

Praying to statues is talking to walls: one must grasp the logos

यथार्थ को जैसा है वैसा देखनाउनके सिद्धांत से निष्कर्षित

Heraclitus sharply criticises the religious forms of his time. Those who purify themselves by defiling themselves with blood are like someone who, having stepped into mud, would wash it off with mud; and they pray to statues as if one were to converse with houses, knowing nothing of gods or heroes (B5). Mystery rites, as practised, are unholy (B14). What he proposes instead is a form of attention: to listen to the logos and not to him (B50), to wake from the sleep in which most live (B1) and to search oneself (B101). The aim is not to gain favours but to see what is, the common logos that nature, which loves to hide, conceals.

क्या बुद्धि परम को जान सकती है?

Nature loves to hide; the logos is common, but few grasp it

गूढ़ ज्ञानउनके सिद्धांत से निष्कर्षित

Heraclitus believes the logos can be understood — it is common to all, as thinking is (B113) — but that almost no one does. Nature loves to hide (B123), invisible harmony is better than visible (B54), and the lord whose oracle is at Delphi neither speaks nor conceals but gives signs (B93), just like his own enigmatic style, which earned him the nickname “the Obscure”. Eyes and ears are bad witnesses for those with barbarian souls (B107), and much learning does not give understanding (B40). Unless one expects the unexpected, one will not find it (B18). The ultimate is accessible but requires deciphering the signs; truth is in plain sight, hidden from those who cannot look.

संसार से हटें या उसे बदलें?

The people must fight for the law as for its city wall

समाज को व्यवस्थित करनास्पष्ट रूप से कहा है

Ancient biography relates that Heraclitus renounced hereditary kingship in favour of his brother, refused to give laws to Ephesus and ended up living in the mountains, feeding on herbs. But these anecdotes, transmitted by Diogenes Laertius, are largely regarded as inferences from his fragments. The fragments themselves speak otherwise: the people must fight for the law as for the wall (B44); those who speak with understanding must rely on what is common to all, as a city on its law, and far more strongly, for all human laws are nourished by one, the divine (B114). Wisdom thus has a civic dimension: just law reflects the logos.