Aller au contenu
The ConsciousLibrary

Bouddhisme · Mahāyāna · Zen / Chan

Dōgen

道元 · 希玄 · 承陽大師 · 永平道元

1200 – 1253Personne historiquement documentée

Moine japonais de l'époque de Kamakura (1200-1253), fondateur de la branche Sôtô du zen au Japon et du monastère d'Eihei-ji. Formé au Tendai, il se rendit dans la Chine des Song et reçut de Rujing la transmission de l'école Caodong. Il enseigna le « simplement s'asseoir » (shikantaza) comme accomplissement et non comme moyen, et laissa avec le Shôbôgenzô, écrit en japonais, l'un des sommets de la philosophie bouddhique. Longtemps ignorée hors de son école, son œuvre fut redécouverte au XXᵉ siècle.

œuvres
115œuvres
éditions
203éditions
citations
9citations
vidéos
11vidéos
images
4images
Dōgen contemplando la luna (Tsukimi no zō)

Dōgen contemplando la luna (Tsukimi no zō) · Public domain

Dans ses propres mots

«To study the Buddha way is to study the self. To study the self is to forget the self. To forget the self is to be verified by the myriad things. To be verified by the myriad things is to let the body and mind of oneself and the body and mind of others drop away.»

Shōbōgenzō, «Genjōkōan» (1233). Traducción propia del japonés.

Son idée centrale

Just sitting (shikantaza): An expression Dōgen attributes to his teacher Rujing: "just sitting" (shikan, "only, solely"; taza, "sitting").

Biographie

5 min de lecture

Traduction assistée à partir de l'original espagnol, en attente de relecture par un traducteur natif.

Un aristocrate orphelin sur le mont Hiei

Dôgen naquit à Kyôto au début de l'an 1200, au sein de la haute noblesse de cour. L'identité de ses parents demeure incertaine : la tradition, qui s'appuie sur la chronique de Kenzei (1452) révisée au XVIIIᵉ siècle, en fait le fils du ministre Koga (Minamoto) Michichika et d'une fille du régent Matsudono Motofusa, tandis que d'autres historiens lui donnent pour père Horikawa Michitomo. Les mêmes sources rapportent qu'il perdit son père à deux ans et sa mère à sept, et que la fumée de l'encens, lors des funérailles maternelles, lui révéla l'impermanence : récit édifiant, que rien ne permet de vérifier.

Vers 1213, il reçut l'ordination sur le mont Hiei, le grand centre de l'école Tendai. Selon sa biographie traditionnelle, une question l'y tourmentait : si tous les êtres possèdent d'emblée la nature de bouddha, comme l'enseignait la doctrine de l'éveil originel, pourquoi les bouddhas de tous les temps se sont-ils astreints à la pratique ? En 1217, il entra au Kennin-ji de Kyôto, le monastère fondé par Eisai, qui avait introduit au Japon l'école Rinzai, et devint le disciple de son successeur Myôzen.

La Chine : le cuisinier et le maître

En 1223, Dôgen et Myôzen s'embarquèrent pour la Chine des Song. Son propre récit, dans les Instructions au cuisinier, rapporte deux rencontres décisives : celle d'un vieux cuisinier de monastère qui avait parcouru des lieues pour acheter des champignons et refusa de s'attarder à converser, parce que son travail était sa pratique ; et celle d'un autre qui faisait sécher des champignons sous le soleil de midi et répondit que « les autres ne sont pas moi ». Tous deux lui apprirent que la voie n'est pas séparée des tâches ordinaires.

Après avoir parcouru plusieurs monastères, il rencontra en 1225, sur le mont Tiantong, le maître Rujing, de l'école Caodong, qui exigeait de ses moines une pratique implacable de la méditation assise. Sous sa direction, Dôgen fit l'expérience qu'il nommera « se dépouiller du corps et de l'esprit » (shinjin datsuraku) et reçut la transmission de la lignée. La même année, Myôzen mourut au monastère ; Dôgen recueillit ses reliques et en laissa le témoignage. Les notes de ses entretiens avec Rujing, le Hôkyôki, furent retrouvées par son disciple Ejô après sa mort.

Le retour les mains vides

Il regagna le Japon en 1227. Des années plus tard, il résumerait son voyage en une phrase célèbre : il avait appris que les yeux sont à l'horizontale et le nez à la verticale, et il revenait « les mains vides », sans rapporter un seul poil de bouddhisme. C'est cette année-là qu'il aurait rédigé le Fukan zazengi, exhortation universelle à la pratique du zazen, dont la copie autographe de 1233 est conservée à Eihei-ji. Après un séjour au Kennin-ji, il se retira à Fukakusa, au sud de Kyôto, où il écrivit le Bendôwa en 1231 et fonda en 1233 le monastère de Kôshô-ji.

C'est au Kôshô-ji que se forma la première communauté : en 1234 arriva Koun Ejô, qui serait son successeur, et en 1241 le rejoignit un groupe de moines de l'école Daruma, parmi lesquels Gikai et Gien. Il y rédigea le Tenzo kyôkun (1237) et la plupart des fascicules qui composent le Shôbôgenzô, écrits en japonais et non en chinois, comme le voulait l'usage chez les maîtres de son temps. On y trouve « Genjôkôan » (1233), « Uji » et « Sansuikyô » (1240), ainsi que « Busshô » (1241).

Echizen et Eihei-ji

En 1243, pour des raisons qui restent débattues — la pression des moines du mont Hiei, la concurrence d'autres maîtres zen dans la capitale ou le désir d'une vie monastique plus rigoureuse —, Dôgen accepta l'invitation de son protecteur, le guerrier Hatano Yoshishige, et s'établit dans la province d'Echizen, sur la côte de la mer du Japon. Durant le premier hiver, il prêcha dans des temples de montagne avec une intensité extraordinaire : en quelques mois, il prononça des dizaines de fascicules. En 1244, il fonda le Daibutsu-ji, qu'il rebaptisa en 1246 Eihei-ji, « Temple de la Paix éternelle ».

À Eihei-ji, Dôgen se consacra à la vie monastique et à la formation d'une communauté restreinte et exigeante. Ses sermons formels en chinois furent réunis dans l'Eihei kôroku, et ses règlements — sur la cuisine, les repas, la conduite envers les moines anciens ou les charges du monastère — formèrent plus tard les Règles pures d'Eihei. En 1247-1248, il se rendit à Kamakura à l'invitation du régent Hôjô Tokiyori, mais revint au bout de quelques mois et refusa d'y fonder un temple.

Les dernières années

Dans ses dernières années, il révisa en profondeur le Shôbôgenzô et entreprit une nouvelle série de douze fascicules, davantage centrés sur la foi en la causalité karmique, les préceptes et la vie monastique ; il entendait en réunir cent. Malade, il écrivit le dernier, « Les huit prises de conscience du grand être », au début de 1253. L'été venu, il céda la charge d'abbé à Ejô et partit se soigner à Kyôto. Il y mourut le vingt-huitième jour du huitième mois de 1253, à cinquante-trois ans. La tradition a conservé un poème d'adieu et le récit selon lequel il aurait inscrit sur un pilier un passage du Sûtra du Lotus.

Une œuvre redécouverte

Pendant des siècles, le Shôbôgenzô fut un trésor gardé par les monastères sôtô, plus vénéré que lu. Les controverses des XVIIᵉ et XVIIIᵉ siècles sur la discipline de la lignée en stimulèrent l'étude, et l'édition d'Eihei-ji, imprimée entre 1796 et 1815, le mit à la portée des moines. En 1926, le philosophe Watsuji Tetsurô le présenta au public cultivé comme une œuvre de pensée, et depuis lors Dôgen est lu aux côtés de Heidegger et de la phénoménologie. Il est aujourd'hui l'un des penseurs japonais les plus traduits, et son école Sôtô compte parmi les plus importantes du bouddhisme japonais.

Sources: Kim, Hee-Jin. Eihei Dōgen: Mystical Realist. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004 (1.ª ed. Dōgen Kigen—Mystical Realist, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1975). ISBN 9780861713769. · Bodiford, William M. Sōtō Zen in Medieval Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1993. ISBN 9780824814823. · Bodiford, William M. «Textual Genealogies of Dōgen». En Steven Heine (ed.), Dōgen: Textual and Historical Studies. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 15–41. ISBN 9780199754472. · Tanahashi, Kazuaki (ed.). Treasury of the True Dharma Eye: Zen Master Dogen's Shobo Genzo. Boston: Shambhala, 2010. ISBN 9781590304747. · Leighton, Taigen Dan; Okumura, Shohaku (trads.). Dōgen's Extensive Record: A Translation of the Eihei Kōroku. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004 (ed. rev. 2010, ISBN 9780861716708).

Chronologie

La vie, année après année

Chaque point est un événement documenté. Cliquez pour le lire, avec sa source et son degré de certitude.

  1. 19 janvier 1200 · 0 ans

    Birth

    Born on the 2nd day of the 1st month of Shōji 2 (19 January 1200 in the Julian calendar; 26 January in the proleptic Gregorian), into a family of the high nobility. His exact parentage is disputed.

    Documenté

  2. 1207 · 7 ans

    Death of his mother

    According to Kenzei's chronicle, his mother dies when he is seven; tradition links his vocation to this bereavement.

    Tradition

  3. 1213 · 13 ans

    Tendai ordination

    Receives the tonsure on Mount Hiei under the name Buppōbō Dōgen.

    Probable

  4. 1217 · 17 ans

    Disciple of Myōzen

    Enters Kennin-ji, founded by Eisai, and studies with his successor Myōzen, of the Rinzai Zen school.

    Documenté

  5. 1223 · 23 ans

    Journey to Song China

    Sails to China with Myōzen. At the port he meets the old cook of Mount Ayuwang, an episode he relates in the Tenzo kyōkun.

    Documenté

  6. 1225 · 25 ans

    Rujing and "dropping off body and mind"

    Studies with Tiantong Rujing of the Caodong school, receives his transmission and, according to his school, attains realisation. Myōzen dies at Tiantong the same year.

    Documenté

  7. 1227 · 27 ans

    Return to Japan

    Returns to Japan with Myōzen's relics. The first draft of the Fukanzazengi is attributed to this year.

    Documenté

  8. 1231 · 31 ans

    Bendōwa

    Writes the Bendōwa, an exposition of zazen practice in question-and-answer form (colophon: "Kangi, year of the hare, mid-autumn").

    Documenté

  9. 1233 · 33 ans

    Founding of Kōshō-ji and "Genjōkōan"

    Founds Kannon-dōri-in (Kōshō-ji). Writes "Genjōkōan" for a lay disciple from Kyūshū and copies the Fukanzazengi in his own hand (Tenpuku version).

    Documenté

  10. 1234 · 34 ans

    Koun Ejō arrives

    Ejō, formerly of the Daruma school, becomes his disciple; he will be his successor and the compiler of many of his works.

    Documenté

  11. 1243 · 43 ans

    Move to Echizen

    Invited by Hatano Yoshishige, he leaves Kyoto and settles in the mountains of Echizen, where in a few months he preaches dozens of fascicles.

    Documenté

  12. 1246 · 46 ans

    Daibutsu-ji renamed Eihei-ji

    The monastery founded in 1244 is given the name Eihei-ji, "Temple of Eternal Peace".

    Documenté

  13. 1247 · 47 ans

    Journey to Kamakura

    Invited by the regent Hōjō Tokiyori, he teaches in Kamakura for some months and returns to Eiheiji in 1248.

    Documenté

  14. 1253 · 53 ans

    Last fascicle

    On the 6th day of the 1st month he writes "Hachi dainingaku" (The Eight Awarenesses of the Great Being), the last of the twelve-fascicle series.

    Documenté

  15. 22 septembre 1253 · 53 ans

    Death

    Dies in Kyoto on the 28th day of the 8th month of Kenchō 5 (22 September 1253 Julian; 29 September proleptic Gregorian), at the house of his disciple Kakunen.

    Documenté

  16. 1815

    Eiheiji printed edition

    Woodblock printing of the Shōbōgenzō begins in the Eiheiji edition (Honzan-ban), the basis of modern 95-fascicle editions.

    Documenté

  17. 1879

    Title of Jōyō Daishi

    Emperor Meiji grants him the posthumous title Jōyō Daishi; in 1854 Emperor Kōmei had bestowed that of Busshō Dentō Kokushi.

    Documenté

  18. 1926

    Watsuji Tetsurō and the rediscovery

    The philosopher Watsuji publishes "Shamon Dōgen", presenting Dōgen as a thinker to the Japanese educated public.

    Documenté

Œuvres

Œuvres essentielles

Les œuvres sans lesquelles on ne comprend pas son héritage.

Shōbōgenzō (Treasury of the True Dharma Eye) — Dōgen

Œuvre écrite · v. 1253

Shōbōgenzō (Treasury of the True Dharma Eye)

正法眼蔵

Dōgen's major work and one of the summits of Buddhist thought. Its fascicles, preached or written over twenty-two years, comment on kōans, sutras and sayings of Chinese masters in a deliberately twisted Japanese that breaks Chinese syntax to make the texts say what, in his view, they really say. It treats the oneness of practice and realisation, buddha-nature as impermanence, being-time, Dharma transmission, zazen and monastic life down to its most concrete details. It was little read outside his school until the 20th century.

10 éditions

Œuvre écrite · v. 1227

Fukanzazengi (Universal Recommendation for Zazen)

普勧坐禅儀

A short manifesto in Chinese parallel prose presenting zazen as the universal practice, open to all. It describes the place, posture, breathing and mental attitude —"thinking not-thinking"— and asserts that zazen is not a method for attaining awakening but "the Dharma gate of ease and joy". It is the text Sōtō monasteries recite each evening.

2 éditions

Tenzo kyōkun (Instructions for the Cook) — Dōgen

Œuvre écrite · 1237

Tenzo kyōkun (Instructions for the Cook)

典座教訓

Instructions for the monk in charge of the kitchen, an office Dōgen considered among the highest in the monastery. It explains how to plan, wash rice or handle ingredients with the same care as one's eyes, and includes the account of his encounters in China with two old cooks. It ends with the "three minds": joyful, nurturing and magnanimous.

Non disponible Voir le livre

2 éditions

Toute son œuvre (115)

Voir ses 115 œuvres dans la bibliothèque

Citations

Citations localisées dans une œuvre précise. Chacune porte sa provenance et son degré de fiabilité.

To study the Buddha way is to study the self. To study the self is to forget the self. To forget the self is to be verified by the myriad things. To be verified by the myriad things is to let the body and mind of oneself and the body and mind of others drop away.

佛道をならふといふは、自己をならふ也。自己をならふといふは、自己をわするるなり。自己をわするるといふは、萬法に證せらるるなり。萬法に證せらるるといふは、自己の身心および他己の身心をして脱落せしむるなり。

VérifiéeShōbōgenzō, «Genjōkōan» (1233). Traducción propia del japonés.

1 / 9
Citations apocryphes ou d'attribution contestée (1)
  • «"If you cannot find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?"»

    Widely circulated online as a quotation from Dōgen. It has not been located in that form in the Shōbōgenzō or the Eihei kōroku; it seems a free paraphrase of ideas from "Genjōkōan" or the Fukanzazengi ("why leave your own seat to wander in the dusty lands of other countries?").

Dernières paroles

Attribution traditionnelle

«"Fifty-four years lighting up the highest heaven. With a leap I shatter the billion worlds. Ah! The whole body seeks nothing: alive, I plunge into the Yellow Springs."»

五十四年 照第一天 打箇𨁝跳 觸破大千 咦 渾身無覓 活陷黄泉

A farewell poem (yuige) transmitted by Kenzei's chronicle (1452), two centuries after his death, and reproduced by the Sōtō tradition. It closely follows the death poem of his teacher Rujing, which may be homage or reconstruction. The same chronicle relates that, days before dying in Kyoto, Dōgen walked around his room reciting the Lotus Sutra passage declaring that any place where practice occurs is a place of awakening, wrote it on a pillar and named the house "Lotus Sutra Hermitage". The "fifty-four years" follow the traditional reckoning of age.

Source: Kenzei. Eihei kaisan Dōgen oshō gyōjō Kenzeiki (Crónica de Kenzei), 1452; ed. de Kawamura Kōdō, Shohon taikō Eihei kaisan Dōgen zenji gyōjō Kenzeiki, Tokio: Taishūkan shoten, 1975.

Interroger

Ce que répond son œuvre

Douze grandes questions de l'humanité et ce que ses textes permettent d'y répondre, références à l'appui. Nous ne lui prêtons jamais de paroles.

  • Qu'est-ce que l'Absolu ? Dieu existe-t-il ?

    No creator and no eternal mind: the whole of existence is buddha-nature

    Pas de Dieu créateurIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen does not raise the question of a creator God: his framework is Mahāyāna Buddhism, in which liberation depends on no supreme being. What takes the place of the ultimate is buddha-nature, and in «Busshō» he rereads it radically: the Nirvana Sutra's statement that all beings have buddha-nature comes to mean that the whole of existence is buddha-nature. At the same time he refuses to read it as a soul or eternal mind hidden behind phenomena; in «Sokushin zebutsu» and in the «Bendōwa» he calls that idea the heresy of Śreṇika. The ultimate is not behind things: according to «Shohō jissō», the true form of reality is phenomena themselves, mountains, rivers and the earth.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qui suis-je ? Existe-t-il un vrai soi ?

    To study the self is to forget the self

    Il n'y a pas de soi permanentIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen's answer lies in the most quoted passage of the «Genjōkōan»: to study the Buddha way is to study the self; to study the self is to forget the self; to forget the self is to be verified by the ten thousand things, and that is to drop off one's own body and mind and those of others. There is no true self to be discovered behind body and mind: in the «Bendōwa» and in «Sokushin zebutsu» Dōgen expressly rejects the idea of an eternal mind-nature that would survive the dissolution of the body. What is called self is realised in letting go, in the «dropping off of body and mind» he heard from his teacher Rujing and identifies with zazen.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi souffrons-nous ?

    Flowers fall though we love them: suffering is resisting impermanence

    Le désir et l'attachementCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    Dōgen does not build a theory of suffering distinct from the classical Buddhist one, but he gives it his own accent. In the «Genjōkōan», after describing how buddhas awaken within delusion, he observes that, even so, flowers fall though we love them and weeds grow though we dislike them: attachment and aversion stop nothing. The talks recorded by Ejō in the Shōbōgenzō zuimonki return again and again to impermanence, to the brevity of life and to the desire for fame and gain as what turns one from the way. The remedy is not to flee change but to practise without seeking gain, as the Gakudō yōjinshū asks, and to drop the self that clings.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Que se passe-t-il après la mort ?

    Life and death are the Buddha's life; karma also ripens in future lives

    Renaissance selon le karmaIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen treats death in two registers. In the «Genjōkōan» firewood does not become ash: firewood occupies its position in time, and ash its own; likewise life does not become death, just as winter does not become spring. In «Zenki» life is the manifestation of the total function and so is death, and the brief «Shōji» states that this birth and death is the very life of the Buddha. None of these texts promises the survival of a soul: the «Bendōwa» expressly rejects the idea of a mind that survives the body. Yet in the late fascicles, such as «Sanjigō», Dōgen insists that karma ripens in this life, in the next or in later ones.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Comment atteint-on la libération ou le salut ?

    Practice and realisation are one: sitting is already awakening

    Par une pratique disciplinéeIl le dit expressément

    For Dōgen, the way is zazen, and his central thesis is in the «Bendōwa»: to think that practice and realisation are not one is the view of those outside the way; in the Buddha Dharma they are one and the same. One does not meditate in order to attain awakening later: sitting in the right posture, seeking nothing, is already its realisation, and so practice never ends. The same text records the watchword of his lineage: from the first meeting with the teacher, do not resort to incense, prostrations, invocations, repentance or sutra reading, but simply sit and drop off body and mind. The Universal Recommendation for Zazen presents it as a gate open to all.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Faut-il un maître ?

    The way is transmitted face to face; without a true teacher, no way

    IndispensableIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen is one of the firmest defenders of the teacher in the history of Zen. His own life illustrates it: he travelled to China because he found no one in Japan to answer him, and only with Rujing did he understand, as he says in the Eihei kōroku, that the eyes are horizontal and the nose vertical. In Points to Watch in Studying the Way he asks the beginner to seek a true teacher, for without one it is better not to study. In «Menju» he insists that the way is transmitted from person to person, face to face, and in «Shisho» he describes the certificate of succession that attests it. In «Jishō zanmai» he criticises those who claim to verify their awakening by themselves, without teacher or scriptures.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Le monde est-il réel ?

    The mountains and waters of the present are the expression of the ancient buddhas

    Manifestation du divinIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen is perhaps the Buddhist thinker who most emphatically affirms the reality of phenomena. The «Sansuikyō» begins by saying that the mountains and waters of right now are the realisation of the expression of the ancient buddhas, and comments on the saying that the blue mountains are constantly walking. In «Shohō jissō» the true form of reality is not behind things but is things themselves. In «Kūge» he inverts the classic image of illusion, the flowers in the sky seen by the diseased eye, and holds that they too are the flowering of reality. And in «Uji» he joins being and time: each thing is a time, complete in its moment, and the whole world is that unfolding.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qu'est-ce que l'amour ?

    Generosity, kind speech, beneficial action and identity with others

    Une compassion sans limitesIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen does not treat love as a feeling but as the conduct of the bodhisattva. His most direct exposition is «Bodaisatta shishōbō», on the four methods by which the bodhisattva draws beings: generosity, which asks nothing in return; kind speech, born of a compassionate mind and able, he says, to change the course of things; action that benefits others without distinguishing between them and oneself; and identity with others, not separating oneself from them. In «Hotsu bodaishin» he defines the mind of awakening as the vow to free others before oneself. And in the Instructions for the Cook he shows the same attitude in the care with which food is prepared for the community.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Sommes-nous libres ou tout est-il déterminé ?

    No one escapes causality, not even the awakened

    Le karma et le choixIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen returns twice to the kōan of Baizhang's wild fox: a former master was reborn five hundred times as a fox for answering that one who has awakened does not fall into the law of cause and effect, and was freed on hearing that he does not ignore it. In «Dai shugyō» he treats it with the ambiguity of the kōan; in «Jinshin inga», from his late series, he strongly affirms that no one, not even the awakened, escapes the causality of karma, and that denying it is the worst of wrong views. «Sanjigō» explains how acts ripen in this life or later ones. But karma does not cancel practice: «Shoaku makusa» recalls that not doing evil and practising good is something chosen and carried out.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi méditer ou prier ?

    Zazen is not learning meditation: it is the gate of repose and joy

    La méditation n'est pas une techniqueIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen devoted whole texts to zazen, from the Universal Recommendation for Zazen to «Zazengi» and «Zazenshin». In them he describes precisely the place, the cushion, the posture, the breathing and the attitude: sitting immobile like a mountain, think not-thinking; and how does one think not-thinking, by non-thinking. But he warns that the zazen he speaks of is not learning meditation, not a gradual technique for reaching a state: it is the gate of repose and joy, the Dharma itself. In «Zazenshin» he criticises quietist readings that make meditation an emptying of the mind. One sits, then, not to obtain something, but because sitting in this way is already the realisation of the way.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • La raison peut-elle connaître l'ultime ?

    The way is not intelligence, yet words too realise it

    L'ultime est au-delà du mentalIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen occupies a singular place in Zen. On the one hand, he warns in Points to Watch in Studying the Way that the way must not be confused with intelligence or learning, and his instruction for zazen is to think not-thinking: an activity that is neither thinking nor ceasing to think. On the other, he rejects the Zen contempt for words. In «Gabyō» he holds, against the proverb, that without painted rice cakes there is no way to satisfy hunger; in «Dōtoku», that the buddhas always express the way and that saying something true is realisation itself; in «Bukkyō», that there is no special transmission outside the scriptures. Language is not a finger pointing at the moon: rightly used, it is the moon.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Se retirer du monde ou le transformer ?

    Leaving home is the way of all buddhas, far from court and fame

    Se retirer pour trouverIl le dit expressément

    Dōgen's views evolved on this point. In the 1231 «Bendōwa» he answered that lay people too can practise zazen and realise the way. But over the years he increasingly affirmed the superiority of monastic life: in «Shukke», preached in 1246 at the newly founded Eihei-ji, he holds that all buddhas attained the way after leaving home, and «Shukke kudoku», from his late series, sets out with sutra quotations the merits of ordination over lay life. His own life reflects it: in 1243 he left Kyoto for the mountains of Echizen, far from the court, and the Pure Standards of Eihei regulate every gesture of a secluded community. Service to the world is done from monastic practice.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres

Affinités et tensions

Affinités et tensions

Calculées question par question à partir de ses positions. La raison de chaque accord ou de chaque désaccord s'affiche d'un clic.

Anecdotes et récits

Anecdotes et récits

Témoignage1223

The two cooks

In May 1223, newly arrived at the port of Ningbo, Dōgen was still aboard the Japanese ship when an old monk in his sixties came on board to buy mushrooms. He was the cook (tenzo) of the monastery on Mount Ayuwang and had walked some twenty miles to prepare a special soup. Dōgen, delighted, invited him to stay and talk and asked why, at his age, he did not devote himself to meditation and the study of texts rather than cooking. The old man laughed: "Good foreigner, you do not yet understand what practice is or what words are." Months later, at Tiantong, he saw another old cook, bent and hatless, drying mushrooms under a scorching sun. He asked why he did not give the task to an assistant. "Others are not me," he replied. "And why now, in this heat?" "If not now, when?" Dōgen told both encounters in his Instructions for the Cook as the origin of his understanding that the way lies in everyday work.

Origine du récit: Dōgen's own first-person account in the Tenzo kyōkun (1237), written fourteen years later.

Source: Uchiyama, Kōshō; Wright, Thomas (trad.). Refining Your Life: From the Zen Kitchen to Enlightenment (incluye la traducción del Tenzo kyōkun). Nueva York / Tokio: Weatherhill, 1983. ISBN 9780834801790.

Récit hagiographique1225

"Drop off body and mind!"

According to Sōtō tradition, one early morning in 1225, during intensive meditation on Mount Tiantong, Rujing saw that the monk sitting next to Dōgen had fallen asleep. He struck him with his slipper and shouted: "Zen practice is the dropping off of body and mind! What do you expect to achieve by sleeping?" On hearing this, Dōgen suddenly awoke to reality. He went to the abbot's room, burned incense and prostrated himself. Rujing asked why. "Body and mind have dropped off," he replied. Rujing confirmed it: "Body and mind dropped off; dropped off body and mind." Dōgen warned him not to approve him lightly, and the master answered that he was not doing so. The scene has become the school's founding moment, but Dōgen himself does not narrate it: although "dropping off body and mind" appears constantly in his writings and in the Hōkyōki, the dramatised account comes from much later biographies.

Origine du récit: The dialogue appears in Sōtō biographies of the 14th and 15th centuries, particularly Kenzei's chronicle (1452). Scholars (Kim, Heine) treat it as a hagiographic reconstruction of an experience Dōgen mentions without narrating.

Source: Kenzei. Eihei kaisan Dōgen oshō gyōjō Kenzeiki (Crónica de Kenzei), 1452; ed. de Kawamura Kōdō, Shohon taikō Eihei kaisan Dōgen zenji gyōjō Kenzeiki, Tokio: Taishūkan shoten, 1975.

Documentéc. 1236

Coming home with empty hands

In one of his first formal sermons at Kōshō-ji, recorded in the Eihei kōroku, Dōgen summed up in a few words what he had brought from China. He had not visited many monasteries, he said; he had simply met his teacher Rujing and recognised at once that the eyes are horizontal and the nose vertical, and since then no one had been able to deceive him. So he had come home with empty hands, without a single hair of Buddhism. And he added: time passes naturally; every morning the sun rises in the east, every night the moon sets in the west; the clouds gather and the bare mountains appear; the rain stops and the surrounding hills look low. Against those who returned from the continent laden with sutras, images and relics, Dōgen presented his journey as the discovery of the most obvious.

Origine du récit: Eihei kōroku, vol. 1, formal sermon no. 48, in his disciples' compilation; words attributed to Dōgen in a contemporary record.

Source: Leighton, Taigen Dan; Okumura, Shohaku (trads.). Dōgen's Extensive Record: A Translation of the Eihei Kōroku. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004 (ed. rev. 2010, ISBN 9780861716708).

Récit hagiographiquec. 1213–1217

The great doubt of Mount Hiei

Traditional biographies place the origin of Dōgen's search in a question he asked himself on Mount Hiei as a young Tendai monk. The dominant doctrine, that of original enlightenment (hongaku), taught that all beings are inherently buddhas. If so, he wondered, why did the buddhas of the three times have to arouse the mind of the way and practise so strenuously? None of his teachers could answer him, and on the advice of one of them he is said to have gone to Kennin-ji and eventually to China. The question sums up exactly the problem Dōgen would resolve with the oneness of practice and realisation: practice does not lead to an absent buddhahood but is its manifestation. That is precisely why historians regard it as a retrospective formulation, composed from his mature work.

Origine du récit: Kenzei's chronicle (1452) and later Sōtō biographies. Kim and Bodiford read it as a doctrinal reconstruction rather than a biographical memory.

Source: Kenzei. Eihei kaisan Dōgen oshō gyōjō Kenzeiki (Crónica de Kenzei), 1452; ed. de Kawamura Kōdō, Shohon taikō Eihei kaisan Dōgen zenji gyōjō Kenzeiki, Tokio: Taishūkan shoten, 1975.

Documenté1247–1248

Return from Kamakura

In 1247, invited by the regent Hōjō Tokiyori, effective ruler of warrior Japan, Dōgen left Eihei-ji and spent some eight months in Kamakura teaching laypeople. On his return, in the third month of 1248, he ascended the Dharma hall and explained himself to his monks. Some might think, he said, that he valued laypeople more than monks, or that in Kamakura he had spoken of a Dharma he had never taught them. Not so: he had only preached that those who do good rise and those who do evil fall, that one reaps what one sows, that one should throw away the tile and keep the jade. And he confessed that his love of the mountain was now greater than before. The scene shows a master who refuses the protection of political power, in contrast to the Rinzai masters of his time, who founded great temples in Kamakura.

Origine du récit: Eihei kōroku, vol. 3, formal sermon no. 251, delivered on his return; the length of the journey is inferred from the dates of the sermons.

Source: Leighton, Taigen Dan; Okumura, Shohaku (trads.). Dōgen's Extensive Record: A Translation of the Eihei Kōroku. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004 (ed. rev. 2010, ISBN 9780861716708).

Récit hagiographique1248

The expulsion of Genmyō

Kenzei's chronicle relates that, after the journey to Kamakura, Hōjō Tokiyori wished to donate land to Eihei-ji and handed the deed of donation to a monk named Genmyō, who returned to the monastery proud of his errand and announced it to all. Dōgen, indignant that a monk should rejoice at bringing wealth and ties to power, expelled him at once. Not content with that, he had his seat removed from the monks' hall and the earth beneath it dug out to a depth of seven feet, so that no trace of his presence remained. The story, often cited to illustrate Dōgen's austerity and his refusal of political patronage, does not appear in his writings or in thirteenth-century sources.

Origine du récit: Kenzei's chronicle (1452), two centuries later. No confirmation in contemporary sources.

Source: Kenzei. Eihei kaisan Dōgen oshō gyōjō Kenzeiki (Crónica de Kenzei), 1452; ed. de Kawamura Kōdō, Shohon taikō Eihei kaisan Dōgen zenji gyōjō Kenzeiki, Tokio: Taishūkan shoten, 1975.

Enseignements

Enseignements

Les notions qui structurent sa pensée, expliquées dans leur contexte.

Just sitting (shikantaza)shikantaza
An expression Dōgen attributes to his teacher Rujing: "just sitting" (shikan, "only, solely"; taza, "sitting"). It designates zazen practised without an object of meditation, without a kōan and without aspiring to an awakening experience as a future goal. For Dōgen, zazen is not a means to reach enlightenment but enlightenment itself in action: sitting in the posture of the buddhas is acting as a buddha. Hence the demand for constant practice and the insistence on correct form —place, posture, breathing, hands—, detailed in the Fukanzazengi and the "Zazengi" fascicle. The expression became the emblem of the Sōtō school as against kōan-based Rinzai Zen, although Dōgen himself commented on hundreds of kōans and did not define himself in opposition to another school.

Bendōwa, Fukanzazengi, "Zazengi", "Zanmai ō zanmai", Hōkyōki.

Source: Bielefeldt, Carl. Dōgen's Manuals of Zen Meditation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.

Dropping off body and mind (shinjin datsuraku)shinjin-datsuraku
A formula Dōgen received from Rujing, describing both zazen and realisation. It does not mean abandoning the body to free the soul, nor suppressing the mind, but that the distinction between a practising self and an outer world ceases to function as a boundary. In "Genjōkōan" it appears at the end of the chain: studying the way, studying the self, forgetting the self, being verified by the myriad things and finally letting the body and mind of oneself and others drop away. Dōgen insists that this dropping off is not a state reached once and for all but is renewed in each practice, and he even inverts the formula —"body and mind dropped off"— to indicate that what has dropped off is also what remains standing.

Hōkyōki, Bendōwa, "Genjōkōan", Eihei kōroku.

Source: Kim, Hee-Jin. Eihei Dōgen: Mystical Realist. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004 (1.ª ed. Dōgen Kigen—Mystical Realist, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1975). ISBN 9780861713769.

Oneness of practice and realisation (shushō ittō)shusho-itto
Dōgen's answer to the question that, according to tradition, had led him to China: if all beings possess buddha-nature, why practise? In the Bendōwa he states that thinking practice and realisation are two things is a view alien to Buddhism: practice is "practice upon realisation" and realisation manifests only in practising. Hence "the beginner's practice is already the whole of original realisation", and there is no moment when one may stop practising because one has arrived. The formula rejects both the quietism of one who believes he is already a buddha without doing anything and the instrumentalism of one who practises to obtain a result.

Bendōwa (1231); basis of his critique of the Tendai doctrine of original enlightenment.

Source: 正法眼藏 (Bendōwa, 75 fascículos y 12 fascículos), texto japonés con colofones de fecha y lugar de cada fascículo. Edición en línea del templo Shōmon-ji (松門寺).

Actualising the fundamental point (genjōkōan)genjokoan
The title of the first fascicle of the Shōbōgenzō and one of Dōgen's central expressions. Kōan, which in Zen designated the "cases" or dialogues used as objects of practice, is understood here as reality itself as it presents itself; genjō means "to manifest, to be realised". Each thing, in its moment, is a complete case that does not refer to another: firewood does not turn into ash, but firewood and ash each occupy their position in the Dharma, with their before and after. Awakening is like the moon reflected in water: the moon does not get wet and the water is not broken, and the whole moon fits in a dewdrop. The expression gave its name to the reading of Dōgen as a thinker of presence.

"Genjōkōan" (1233, revised in 1252).

Source: Tanahashi, Kazuaki (ed.). Treasury of the True Dharma Eye: Zen Master Dogen's Shobo Genzo. Boston: Shambhala, 2010. ISBN 9781590304747.

Being-time (uji)uji
In Chinese the expression youshi (Japanese uji) simply means "at times". Dōgen splits it into u, "being, existence", and ji, "time", and builds on it one of the most original reflections on temporality. Time is not a river flowing apart from things: every being is time and every time is being. I myself unfold time, and each moment contains the whole universe. Time "passes" (kyōryaku) not as linear succession but as a going from today to tomorrow, from today to yesterday and from yesterday to today, without one moment cancelling another. The reading of Dōgen alongside Heidegger, begun in the 20th century, has made this fascicle one of the most discussed texts of Japanese philosophy.

"Uji" (1240); related to "Genjōkōan" and "Busshō".

Source: Nagatomo, Shigenori. «Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Publicado el 28-06-2006; revisión sustancial del 07-03-2024.

Thinking not-thinking (hishiryō)hishiryo
Dōgen takes from a dialogue of the Chinese master Yaoshan the description of the mental attitude of zazen. A monk asks what the master thinks while sitting motionless; Yaoshan replies: "I think not-thinking." "How do you think not-thinking?" "Beyond thinking" (hishiryō). Dōgen makes this exchange "the essential art of zazen" in the Fukanzazengi and in the "Zazengi" and "Zazenshin" fascicles. Hishiryō is neither discursive thinking (shiryō) nor its suppression (fushiryō), but an awareness that lets thoughts arise and pass without clinging to or rejecting them. The expression has been the object of numerous philosophical interpretations, from phenomenology to cognitive science.

Fukanzazengi, "Zazengi" and "Zazenshin".

Source: Bielefeldt, Carl. Dōgen's Manuals of Zen Meditation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.

All existence is buddha-nature (shitsuu busshō)shitsuu-bussho
The Nirvana Sutra states: "all sentient beings have buddha-nature" (一切衆生悉有仏性). Dōgen rereads the phrase by breaking its Chinese syntax: "all sentient beings; all existence (shitsuu) is buddha-nature". Buddha-nature thus ceases to be a seed or hidden potential within beings, to be actualised in the future, and is identified with existence as a whole, including mountains, rivers and stones. In the same fascicle, "Busshō", he goes so far as to say that impermanence is buddha-nature, and comments on Zhaozhou's "no" to the question whether a dog has buddha-nature as an expression of that same reality. It is one of the best-known examples of his creative reading of scripture.

"Busshō" (1241); critical dialogue with the Tendai doctrine of original enlightenment.

Source: Kim, Hee-Jin. Eihei Dōgen: Mystical Realist. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004 (1.ª ed. Dōgen Kigen—Mystical Realist, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1975). ISBN 9780861713769.

Vidéos

Vidéos

Enregistrements, entretiens et documentaires. Les vidéos sont lues depuis YouTube ; elles ne sont pas hébergées ici.

  • 第四章「証」~道元禅師の生涯~

    Documentaire· JA· 2025· 19 min

    【公式】大本山永平寺Chaîne officielle

  • 第三章「道」~道元禅師の教え~

    Documentaire· JA· 2025· 5 min

    【公式】大本山永平寺Chaîne officielle

  • 【禅のこころ-曹洞宗-】正法眼蔵(法話)

    Conférence· JA· 2022· 4 min

    【公式】禅のこころ-曹洞宗-Chaîne officielle

  • [EN] Soto Zen Buddhism, Daihonzan Eiheiji

    Documentaire· EN· 2014· 11 min

    SOTOZENNETChaîne officielle

  • [ES] Budismo Soto Zen, Daihonzan Eiheiji

    Documentaire· ES· 2013· 11 min

    SOTOZENNETChaîne officielle

  • [FR] Le Bouddhisme Soto Zen, le Sanctuaire Eiheiji

    Documentaire· FR· 2013· 11 min

    SOTOZENNETChaîne officielle

  • Philosophy and Philology in Edo Commentaries on Dōgen's Shōbōgenzō

    Conférence· EN· 2017· 87 min

    SOAS University of LondonChaîne officielle

  • Professor T. Griffith Foulk, "Dogen's Genjo Koan" workshop, June 20, 2020

    Conférence· EN· 2020· 157 min

    Village Zendo

  • The Life and Times of Dogen: Intro to Dogen 1 of 6

    Conférence· EN· 2022· 86 min

    Sanshin Zen Community

  • Le Zen entre deux langues : Le cas de Dôgen (1200-1253) (1) - Jean-Noël Robert (2017-2018)

    Conférence· FR· 2022· 63 min

    Lettres, langage, philosophie - Collège de FranceChaîne officielle

  • Conversación con Dokusho Villalba, maestro zen, traductor de Shobogenzo, de Eihei Dogen

    Entretien· ES· 2023· 30 min

    Editorial KairósChaîne officielle

Galerie

Galerie

Images dont la licence a été vérifiée. Chacune conserve son auteur et son attribution.

Manuscrits

Manuscrits

Témoins manuscrits et textes anciens, avec leur dépositaire et leurs conditions de consultation.

  • ZH · Kanji (escritura regular) · 1233 (Tenpuku 1)

    普勧坐禅儀 (天福本)

    Témoin conservé
    Rollo de 28,8 × 318,7 cm, de mano de Dōgen
    Dépositaire
    Daihonzan Eihei-ji (Eiheiji, Fukui)
    Numérisation
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fukan-Zazengi-In…
  • JA · Kanji y kana · 1241

    正法眼蔵 嗣書

    Témoin conservé
    Fascículo «Shisho» del Shōbōgenzō
    Dépositaire
    Museo de Historia de la Cultura Zen de la Universidad Komazawa (Tokio)
  • JA · Kanji y kana · 1240

    正法眼蔵 山水経

    Témoin conservé
    Fascículo «Sansuikyō» del Shōbōgenzō
    Dépositaire
    Zenkyū-in (Toyohashi)
  • JA · Kanji y kana · Copia de 1446 a partir de otra de 1420

    十二巻本正法眼蔵 (永光寺本)

    Témoin conservé
    Único testimonio completo de la serie de doce fascículos y único de «Ippyakuhachi hōmyōmon»
    Dépositaire
    Yōkō-ji (Hakui, Ishikawa)
Manuscrits →

Relations

Relations

Influences, filiations et affinités. On distingue la relation documentée de la similitude identifiée par analyse.

  • Disciple de

    Tiantong Rujing

    Chinese Caodong master on Mount Tiantong (1225–1227), from whom he received transmission. Dōgen calls him "my late teacher, the old buddha".

    Relation documentée

  • Disciple de

    Myōzen

    Eisai's successor at Kennin-ji; Dōgen's teacher from 1217 and travelling companion to China, where he died in 1225.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Myōan Eisai

    Founder of Kennin-ji, where Dōgen trained in Rinzai Zen. Whether they actually met is disputed: Eisai died in 1215 and Dōgen's references are indirect.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

  • Maître de

    Koun Ejō

    Disciple from 1234, copyist of most Shōbōgenzō fascicles, author of the Shōbōgenzō zuimonki and successor as abbot of Eihei-ji (1253).

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    Keizan Jōkin

    Third successor in his lineage (through Ejō and Gikai), founder of Sōji-ji and great propagator of the Sōtō school; the school venerates Dōgen and Keizan as its two founders.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Huineng

    Dōgen calls the Sixth Patriarch "Daikan Kōso" and comments on his sayings in several fascicles (for example "Busshō" and "Hokke ten hokke").

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Bodhidharma

    Founding patriarch of Chan in tradition; Dōgen comments on his transmission of "skin, flesh, bones and marrow" in "Kattō" and his coming from the west in "Soshi seirai i".

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Nāgārjuna

    Dōgen counts him among the Indian patriarchs of his lineage and comments on his figure in "Busshō".

    Relation documentée

  • Contemporain de

    Shinran

    Contemporaries in early Kamakura-period Kyoto and founders of two of the great Japanese schools, with opposite approaches: seated practice versus trust in Amida's power. There is no record that they met.

    Relation documentée

  • Idées proches de

    Zhuangzi

    Both think of reality as transformation and distrust fixed categories; an affinity noted by modern interpreters.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

Sources

Sources

Bibliographie et catalogues consultés pour cette fiche.

  1. Wikidata, entidad Q318064 «Dōgen» (P31=Q5; 54 enlaces entre wikis; nombre nativo 道元; nacimiento 1200, muerte 1253 en Kioto).
  2. Kim, Hee-Jin. Eihei Dōgen: Mystical Realist. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004 (1.ª ed. Dōgen Kigen—Mystical Realist, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1975). ISBN 9780861713769.
  3. Bodiford, William M. Sōtō Zen in Medieval Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1993. ISBN 9780824814823.
  4. Bodiford, William M. «Textual Genealogies of Dōgen». En Steven Heine (ed.), Dōgen: Textual and Historical Studies. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 15–41. ISBN 9780199754472.
  5. Tanahashi, Kazuaki (ed.). Treasury of the True Dharma Eye: Zen Master Dogen's Shobo Genzo. Boston: Shambhala, 2010. ISBN 9781590304747.
  6. Leighton, Taigen Dan; Okumura, Shohaku (trads.). Dōgen's Extensive Record: A Translation of the Eihei Kōroku. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004 (ed. rev. 2010, ISBN 9780861716708).
  7. Leighton, Taigen Dan; Okumura, Shohaku (trads.). Dōgen's Pure Standards for the Zen Community: A Translation of Eihei Shingi. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996. ISBN 9780791427101.
  8. Bielefeldt, Carl. Dōgen's Manuals of Zen Meditation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
  9. Heine, Steven. Did Dōgen Go to China? What He Wrote and When He Wrote It. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  10. 正法眼藏 (Bendōwa, 75 fascículos y 12 fascículos), texto japonés con colofones de fecha y lugar de cada fascículo. Edición en línea del templo Shōmon-ji (松門寺).
  11. Wikisource en japonés: «普勸坐禪儀» y «學道用心集», según Eiheiji (ed.), Shōyō daishi shōgyō zenshū, vols. 1 y 3, 1909 (Biblioteca Nacional de la Dieta, NDLJP 823139 y 823141).
  12. Kenzei. Eihei kaisan Dōgen oshō gyōjō Kenzeiki (Crónica de Kenzei), 1452; ed. de Kawamura Kōdō, Shohon taikō Eihei kaisan Dōgen zenji gyōjō Kenzeiki, Tokio: Taishūkan shoten, 1975.
  13. Nagatomo, Shigenori. «Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Publicado el 28-06-2006; revisión sustancial del 07-03-2024.
  14. Dumoulin, Heinrich. Zen Buddhism: A History. Vol. 2: Japan. Bloomington: World Wisdom, 2005 (1.ª ed. inglesa 1990). ISBN 9780941532907.
  15. Wikipedia en inglés, «Shōbōgenzō» (listas de las versiones de 60, 75, 12 y 28 fascículos, basadas en Bodiford 2012), y en japonés, «正法眼蔵» y «道元». Consultadas el 25-10-2026 y contrastadas con s4 y s10.
  16. Uchiyama, Kōshō; Wright, Thomas (trad.). Refining Your Life: From the Zen Kitchen to Enlightenment (incluye la traducción del Tenzo kyōkun). Nueva York / Tokio: Weatherhill, 1983. ISBN 9780834801790.
  17. Tanahashi, Kazuaki (ed.). Moon in a Dewdrop: Writings of Zen Master Dōgen. San Francisco: North Point Press, 1985. ISBN 9780865471863.
  18. Masunaga, Reihō (trad.). A Primer of Sōtō Zen: A Translation of Dōgen's Shōbōgenzō Zuimonki. Honolulu: East-West Center Press, 1971. ISBN 9780824800949.
  19. Editorial Kairós. Ficha de «Shōbōgenzō. Volumen I», de Eihei Dōgen, trad. de Dokushō Villalba, ISBN 9788499884653 (e-book 9788499885018).
  20. Daihonzan Eiheiji, sitio oficial del monasterio fundado por Dōgen.
  21. Sōtōshū Shūmuchō, SOTOZEN-NET, sitio oficial de la escuela Sōtō.
  22. Watsuji Tetsurō. «Shamon Dōgen» (El monje Dōgen). En Nihon seishinshi kenkyū (Estudios de historia espiritual de Japón). Tokio: Iwanami Shoten, 1926.
Ayant droit
Obra en dominio público; cada traducción moderna pertenece a su traductor o editorial. Eihei-ji y la Sōtōshū custodian los manuscritos autógrafos.

En attente de confirmation

Ce que cette fiche n'a pas encore pu établir. Nous préférons le dire plutôt que de combler.

  • Filiación de Dōgen (Koga Michichika o Horikawa Michitomo como padre) discutida; la ficha sigue la versión tradicional con reservas.
  • Fechas: se dan en calendario juliano (19-01-1200 y 22-09-1253); Wikidata registra 1253-09-29, que corresponde al gregoriano proléptico. Revisar la entrada de Wikidata.
  • Fascículos sin colofón (serie de 12, «Shōji», «Yuibutsu yobutsu», «Dōshin») registrados con año aproximado (década de 1250); fechas de «Bodaisatta shishōbō» (1243) y «Hokke ten hokke» (1241) tomadas de la tradición, sin ver el colofón.
  • Sala de lectura: el Shōbōgenzō solo está en línea en una página única (Shōmon-ji) que reúne todos los fascículos; el importador no puede separarlos. Buscar una edición por fascículos (Wikisource no la tiene aún). No hay traducciones inglesas o españolas en dominio público.
  • Sala de lectura: confirmar si la transcripción del Shōmon-ji se basa en una edición crítica moderna con derechos editoriales propios en la UE (se ha registrado sin «caution» por ser texto del siglo XIII).
  • ISBN no verificados: Bielefeldt (1988), Heine (2006), Nishijima-Cross (Windbell), Iwanami bunko (Mizuno), traducción italiana de Aldo Tollini; ediciones en ruso, árabe e hindi no localizadas.
  • Confirmar la condición de Bien Cultural Importante del autógrafo de «Sansuikyō» (Zenkyū-in) y la signatura del autógrafo de «Shisho» (Universidad Komazawa).
  • La autenticidad de «Shōji» y de parte de los poemas del Sanshō dōei es discutida; se mantienen como atribuidos.
  • Vídeos: los documentales de France 2 («Sagesses bouddhistes») y la emisión de France Culture «Une vie, une œuvre» (1998) solo están en canales de terceros; no se han incluido.

Recherche effectuée le 2026-10-25