Aller au contenu
The ConsciousLibrary

Tantra · Bouddhisme · Mahāyāna · Bouddhisme tibétain

Tsongkhapa

ཙོང་ཁ་པ་བློ་བཟང་གྲགས་པ། · tsong kha pa blo bzang grags pa · རྗེ་རིན་པོ་ཆེ། · 宗喀巴

1357 – 1419Personne historiquement documentée

Moine, philosophe et réformateur tibétain (1357-1419), né dans l'Amdo et formé pendant deux décennies auprès de maîtres de toutes les écoles du Tibet central. Sa synthèse de la discipline monastique, de l'étude raisonnée, de la voie graduelle (lamrim) et du tantra, ainsi que sa lecture prāsaṅgika de Nāgārjuna, ont fondé l'école gelug, née autour du monastère de Ganden (1409), à laquelle appartiennent les dalaï-lamas. Ses œuvres complètes occupent dix-huit volumes.

œuvres
175œuvres
éditions
58éditions
citations
5citations
vidéos
13vidéos
images
7images
Tsongkhapa, pintura del siglo XVI (Rubin Museum of Art)

Tsongkhapa, pintura del siglo XVI (Rubin Museum of Art) · Public domain

Dans ses propres mots

«Without the wisdom that realises how things are, even if you have trained in renunciation and the mind of awakening you cannot cut the root of existence; therefore strive in the means of realising dependent origination.»

Los tres aspectos principales del camino, estrofa 9 (texto tibetano de Lotsawa House; traducción del investigador)

Son idée centrale

Stages of the path (lamrim): The lamrim is a way of organising all the Buddha's teachings as a graded itinerary for a single person.

Biographie

5 min de lecture

Traduction assistée à partir de l'original espagnol, en attente de relecture par un traducteur natif.

Un moine de l'Amdo

Tsongkhapa naquit en 1357, au dixième mois de l'année du coq de feu, à Tsongkha, contrée de pasteurs de la province de l'Amdo, au nord-est du monde tibétain ; c'est de ce lieu que lui vient le nom sous lequel l'histoire l'a retenu. Son nom de moine était Losang Drakpa, et ses disciples l'appelèrent Je Rinpoché, « le Seigneur précieux ». Presque tout ce que l'on sait de son enfance provient des biographies que ces mêmes disciples, au premier rang desquels Khedrup Gelek Pelzang, rédigèrent dans les années qui suivirent sa mort : à les en croire, il reçut à trois ans les vœux laïcs du quatrième karmapa, Rolpe Dorje, et fut ordonné novice à sept ans par son premier maître, Chöje Döndrub Rinchen, qui l'éleva dans la tradition kadampa.

Vingt ans d'apprentissage

En 1372, à seize ans, il partit pour le Tibet central, d'où il ne devait jamais revenir. S'ensuivit une formation d'une ampleur exceptionnelle, même pour son époque : la médecine et les pratiques kagyu à Drikung auprès de Chenga Chökyi Gyalpo, la Perfection de sagesse au collège de Nyethang Dewachen, l'Abhidharma et la Voie du milieu auprès du sakya Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö, son maître décisif, et le Kālacakra auprès de maîtres de la tradition jonang. À dix-neuf ans, il soutint ses premiers débats publics, et vers vingt-cinq ans il reçut l'ordination complète. Le registre des enseignements qu'il reçut, conservé dans le premier volume de ses œuvres, énumère des lignées de toutes les écoles ; il explique pourquoi la tradition voit en lui un grand synthétiseur plutôt que le fondateur d'une secte.

En 1388-1389, il acheva sa première grande œuvre, la Guirlande d'or de l'éloquence, commentaire monumental de l'Ornement de la claire réalisation qui fit de lui un érudit reconnu. Mais le jeune scolastique n'était pas satisfait de sa compréhension de la vacuité. Vers 1390, il rencontra Lama Umapa, un mystique du Tibet oriental qui, selon les biographies, servait d'intermédiaire avec Mañjuśrī, le bodhisattva de la sagesse ; par son entremise, puis — toujours selon ces récits — directement, Tsongkhapa aurait soumis ses doutes philosophiques à la divinité. La réponse fut une consigne pratique : délaisser un temps l'enseignement, se retirer et se purifier.

La retraite de Wölkha

À partir de 1392, il se retira avec un petit groupe de disciples, huit selon la tradition, dans la vallée de Wölkha, au sud-est de Lhassa. Là, racontent ses biographes, il accomplit des centaines de milliers de prosternations devant les trente-cinq bouddhas de confession, restaura la grande statue de Maitreya du monastère de Dzingchi et reçut du maître Lhodrak Namkha Gyaltsen les instructions kadampa de la voie graduelle. Vers 1397-1398, après avoir rêvé de Nāgārjuna et de ses disciples, il serait parvenu à la compréhension définitive de la vacuité en lisant le commentaire de Buddhapālita aux Stances fondamentales de la Voie du milieu. Les rêves et les visions relèvent de l'hagiographie ; ce qui est vérifiable, c'est l'inflexion de son œuvre vers la lecture prāsaṅgika de Nāgārjuna, qu'il défendrait jusqu'au bout, et le poème qui la célèbre, l'Éloge de la production conditionnée.

Les grands traités

En 1402, au monastère de Radreng (Reting), fondé au XIe siècle par Dromtönpa, disciple d'Atiśa, il acheva le Grand traité des étapes de la voie de l'Éveil, le Lamrim Chenmo. La même année, il réunit à Namtsé Deng la communauté monastique pour restaurer l'observance du vinaya, convaincu que la discipline était la condition de tout le reste. Suivirent les traités sur l'éthique du bodhisattva et l'éthique tantrique (1403), le Grand exposé du mantra secret (1405), l'Essence de l'éloquence et l'Océan du raisonnement, composés à l'ermitage de Sera Chöding en 1407 et 1408, la Lampe qui illumine les cinq étapes (1411), le Lamrim moyen (1415) et, en 1418, l'Illumination de la pensée, son dernier grand commentaire.

Une conviction traverse ces livres. Pour Tsongkhapa, le raisonnement n'est pas l'ennemi de la contemplation mais son instrument : la vacuité doit être comprise par l'analyse, et la simple suspension de la pensée n'y conduit pas. La vacuité, de surcroît, n'abolit pas le monde conventionnel ; c'est précisément parce que rien n'existe par soi-même que les causes produisent des effets et que l'éthique a un sens. D'où son insistance à identifier avec exactitude l'« objet de la négation », afin de ne nier ni trop ni trop peu, et sa critique de ceux qui, au Tibet, confondaient le vide avec le néant ou la méditation avec l'absence d'idées.

Lhassa, 1409

Son prestige parvint jusqu'à la cour de Chine. En 1407, puis de nouveau en 1413, l'empereur Yongle, de la dynastie Ming, l'invita à lui rendre visite ; Tsongkhapa déclina, et sa lettre de réponse est conservée parmi ses écrits divers. Ce fut son disciple Shakya Yeshe qui, des années plus tard, se rendit à la cour à sa place. Au premier mois de 1409, sous le patronage du souverain Phagmodrupa Drakpa Gyaltsen, il inaugura au Jokhang de Lhassa la Grande Fête de la prière (Monlam Chenmo), qui serait célébrée chaque année jusqu'en 1959. La même année, il fonda sur le mont Drok Riwo le monastère de Ganden, « le joyeux », du nom de la terre pure de Maitreya.

Autour de Ganden se forma la communauté que la postérité appellerait Gelug, « ceux de la tradition vertueuse ». Ses disciples multiplièrent les fondations : Jamyang Chöje Tashi Palden ouvrit Drepung en 1416 et Jamchen Chöje Shakya Yeshe, Sera en 1419. Gyaltsab Darma Rinchen et Khedrup Gelek Pelzang furent ses successeurs intellectuels, et un autre disciple, Gendun Drub, serait reconnu par la suite comme le premier dalaï-lama.

Mort et héritage

Tsongkhapa mourut à Ganden en 1419, le vingt-cinquième jour du dixième mois tibétain, date que les monastères gelug commémorent depuis lors par la fête des lampes de Ganden Ngamchö. La tradition rapporte qu'avant de mourir il remit son bonnet et son manteau à Gyaltsab Je, premier détenteur du trône de Ganden. Son corps, conservé dans un stūpa d'argent et d'or, fut vénéré pendant plus de cinq siècles ; après la destruction du monastère en 1959 et pendant la Révolution culturelle, il fut brûlé et, selon le témoignage recueilli par Thomas Laird, seuls le crâne et une partie des cendres furent sauvés.

Peu de figures du bouddhisme tibétain ont été à ce point enveloppées de légende. En 1845, le missionnaire français Évariste Huc trouva à Kumbum, le monastère élevé sur son lieu de naissance, un arbre dont les feuilles, disaient les moines, portaient des lettres sacrées depuis que sa mère y avait jeté ses cheveux ; Huc le vit et ne sut l'expliquer. Les biographies parlent de visions de Mañjuśrī et de signes prodigieux ; ses propres écrits, en revanche, montrent un lecteur infatigable des textes indiens, exigeant envers les sources, qui écrivait pour que d'autres puissent raisonner par eux-mêmes. Cette œuvre, dix-huit volumes dans l'édition de Tashilhunpo, demeure le cœur de la formation des monastères gelug et des enseignements de l'actuel dalaï-lama.

Sources: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465. · Thurman, Robert A. F. (ed.). The Life and Teachings of Tsong Khapa. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1982; nueva ed. 2006, ISBN 9788186470442. Incluye la traducción de la biografía tradicional y de varias obras breves. · Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665. · Tsongkhapa. Ocean of Reasoning: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Trad. Geshe Ngawang Samten y Jay L. Garfield. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780195147339. · Thurman, Robert A. F. Tsong Khapa's Speech of Gold in the Essence of True Eloquence: Reason and Enlightenment in the Central Philosophy of Tibet. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. ISBN 9780691072852 (reed. como The Central Philosophy of Tibet, 1991, ISBN 9780691020679).

Chronologie

La vie, année après année

Chaque point est un événement documenté. Cliquez pour le lire, avec sa source et son degré de certitude.

  1. 1357 · 0 ans

    Birth

    Born in the tenth month of the fire-bird year at Tsongkha (Amdo), into a herding family.

    Documenté

  2. v. 1360 · 3 ans

    Lay vows from the fourth Karmapa

    According to his biographies he receives lay vows and the name Kunga Nyingpo from the fourth Karmapa, Rolpe Dorje.

    Tradition

  3. v. 1363 · 7 ans

    Novice ordination

    He is ordained a novice by Chöje Döndrub Rinchen, his first teacher, receiving the name Losang Drakpa.

    Tradition

  4. 1372 · 16 ans

    Departure for central Tibet

    He leaves Amdo to study in central Tibet and will never return home. He reaches Drikung in the autumn of 1373.

    Documenté

  5. 1375 · 19 ans

    First public debates

    He holds his first formal debates on the great treatises.

    Documenté

  6. v. 1381 · 25 ans

    Full ordination

    He receives full monastic ordination at about twenty-five.

    Probable

  7. v. 1389 · 32 ans

    The Golden Garland

    He completes his commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra (1388–1389), his first major work; that year he makes a Cakrasaṃvara retreat in Yarlung.

    Documenté

  8. v. 1390 · 33 ans

    Meeting Lama Umapa

    He meets the mystic Umapa, through whom, according to the biographies, he consults Mañjuśrī.

    Tradition

  9. v. 1392 · 35 ans

    The Wölkha retreat

    He withdraws with eight disciples to Wölkha; prostrations, purification and restoration of the Dzingchi Maitreya.

    Tradition

  10. v. 1397 · 40 ans

    Insight into emptiness

    After dreaming of Nāgārjuna and his disciples he attains, according to tradition, a definitive understanding of emptiness while reading Buddhapālita; he composes the Praise of Dependent Origination.

    Tradition

  11. 1402 · 45 ans

    The Lamrim Chenmo

    He completes the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path and gathers the community at Namtsé Deng to restore the vinaya.

    Documenté

  12. 1405 · 48 ans

    The Ngagrim Chenmo

    He completes the Great Exposition of Secret Mantra.

    Documenté

  13. 1407 · 50 ans

    The Yongle emperor's invitation; the Essence of Eloquence

    He declines the invitation to the Ming court (repeated in 1413) and composes the Essence of Eloquence and the Ocean of Reasoning at Sera Chöding (1407–1408).

    Documenté

  14. 1409 · 52 ans

    Great Prayer Festival and founding of Ganden

    He institutes the Monlam Chenmo at the Jokhang in the first month, with Drakpa Gyaltsen's patronage, and founds Ganden monastery.

    Documenté

  15. 1415 · 58 ans

    The Middle-Length Lamrim

    He composes the middle-length version of the stages of the path.

    Documenté

  16. 1416 · 59 ans

    Founding of Drepung

    His disciple Jamyang Chöje Tashi Palden founds Drepung.

    Documenté

  17. 1418 · 61 ans

    Illuminating the Intent

    He composes his last great commentary, on Candrakīrti's Entering the Middle Way.

    Documenté

  18. 1419 · 62 ans

    Death

    He dies at Ganden on the 25th day of the tenth Tibetan month; that year his disciple Shakya Yeshe founds Sera.

    Documenté

  19. 1845

    Huc at Kumbum

    The missionary Évariste Huc describes Kumbum's 'tree of ten thousand images' and the legend of its origin.

    Documenté

  20. v. 1966

    Destruction of the tomb

    After Ganden's destruction (1959) and during the Cultural Revolution his preserved body is burned; remains were saved according to testimonies.

    Documenté

Œuvres

Œuvres essentielles

Les œuvres sans lesquelles on ne comprend pas son héritage.

Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment (Lamrim Chenmo) — Tsongkhapa

Œuvre écrite · 1402

Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment (Lamrim Chenmo)

སྐྱེས་བུ་གསུམ་གྱི་ཉམས་སུ་བླང་བའི་རིམ་པ་ཐམས་ཅད་ཚང་བར་སྟོན་པའི་བྱང་ཆུབ་ལམ་གྱི་རིམ་པ། (skyes bu gsum gyi nyams su blang ba'i rim pa thams cad tshang bar ston pa'i byang chub lam gyi rim pa)

His most widely read work and the founding text of the Geluk school. Finished in 1402 at Radreng (Reting) monastery, it expands Atiśa's Lamp for the Path into a complete course for the 'three types of person': one who seeks a good rebirth, one who seeks liberation and one who aspires to buddhahood for the sake of others. Its last two sections, on calm abiding (śamatha) and special insight (vipaśyanā), contain his mature account of emptiness and of the 'object of negation'. It fills vol. 13 (pa) of the collected works.

Non disponible Voir le livre

11 éditions

Great Exposition of Secret Mantra (Ngagrim Chenmo) — Tsongkhapa

Œuvre écrite · 1405

Great Exposition of Secret Mantra (Ngagrim Chenmo)

རྒྱལ་བ་ཁྱབ་བདག་རྡོ་རྗེ་འཆང་ཆེན་པོའི་ལམ་གྱི་རིམ་པ་གསང་བ་ཀུན་གྱི་གནད་རྣམ་པར་ཕྱེ་བ། (rgyal ba khyab bdag rdo rje 'chang chen po'i lam gyi rim pa gsang ba kun gyi gnad rnam par phye ba)

The tantric counterpart of the Lamrim Chenmo, completed in 1405. It sets out systematically the four classes of tantra (action, performance, yoga and highest yoga), the difference between the perfection vehicle and the mantra vehicle, the requirements of initiation and vows, deity yoga and the generation and completion stages of Guhyasamāja. Its central thesis is that tantra does not replace renunciation, bodhicitta and the view of emptiness but presupposes them. It fills vol. 3 (ga).

Non disponible Voir le livre

7 éditions

Essence of Eloquence: Treatise Differentiating the Interpretable and the Definitive — Tsongkhapa

Œuvre écrite · 1407

Essence of Eloquence: Treatise Differentiating the Interpretable and the Definitive

དྲང་བ་དང་ངེས་པའི་དོན་རྣམ་པར་འབྱེད་པའི་བསྟན་བཅོས་ལེགས་བཤད་སྙིང་པོ། (drang ba dang nges pa'i don rnam par 'byed pa'i bstan bcos legs bshad snying po)

Composed in 1407–1408 at the Sera Chöding hermitage above Lhasa, it is his hermeneutical work: how to decide which of the Buddha's teachings are to be taken literally and which require interpretation. It goes through the Mind-Only (Yogācāra) reading of the Saṃdhinirmocana, then those of Bhāviveka and Candrakīrti within Madhyamaka, concluding in favour of the Prāsaṅgika approach. Tradition regards it as the most difficult of his books. Vol. 14 (pha).

Non disponible Voir le livre

3 éditions

The Three Principal Aspects of the Path — Tsongkhapa

Correspondance

The Three Principal Aspects of the Path

ལམ་གྱི་གཙོ་བོ་རྣམ་གསུམ། (lam gyi gtso bo rnam gsum)

Fourteen stanzas sent as a letter to his disciple Tsakho Önpo Ngawang Drakpa in Gyalmorong (eastern Tibet), and preserved among the miscellaneous writings (vol. 2, kha). They reduce the whole path to three dispositions: renunciation or the determination to be free, bodhicitta, and the correct view of emptiness understood as compatible with dependent origination. It is probably the most widely taught and memorised text by Tsongkhapa in the Tibetan world.

Non disponible Voir le livre

4 éditions

Toute son œuvre (175)

Voir ses 175 œuvres dans la bibliothèque

Citations

Citations localisées dans une œuvre précise. Chacune porte sa provenance et son degré de fiabilité.

Without the wisdom that realises how things are, even if you have trained in renunciation and the mind of awakening you cannot cut the root of existence; therefore strive in the means of realising dependent origination.

གནས་ལུགས་རྟོགས་པའི་ཤེས་རབ་མི་ལྡན་ན། །ངེས་འབྱུང་བྱང་ཆུབ་སེམས་ལ་གོམས་བྱས་ཀྱང༌། །སྲིད་པའི་རྩ་བ་བཅད་པར་མི་ནུས་པས། །དེ་ཕྱིར་རྟེན་འབྲེལ་རྟོགས་པའི་ཐབས་ལ་འབད། །

VérifiéeLos tres aspectos principales del camino, estrofa 9 (texto tibetano de Lotsawa House; traducción del investigador)

1 / 5
Citations apocryphes ou d'attribution contestée (1)
  • «The more you understand emptiness, the more respect you will have for the law of cause and effect.»

    Circulates online as a literal quotation from Tsongkhapa. It has not been located in this form in any of his works; it is a popular paraphrase of an idea he does develop (the compatibility of emptiness and dependent origination in the Three Principal Aspects and the Praise of Dependent Origination).

Dernières paroles

Il n'existe aucun témoignage vérifiable de ses dernières paroles.

No reliable last words survive. His disciples' biographies describe his death at Ganden, in meditation, on the 25th of the tenth month of 1419, and tradition adds that he handed his hat and cloak to Gyaltsab Je as a sign of succession, but they transmit no final sentence that can be attributed to him.

Source: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Interroger

Ce que répond son œuvre

Douze grandes questions de l'humanité et ce que ses textes permettent d'y répondre, références à l'appui. Nous ne lui prêtons jamais de paroles.

  • Qu'est-ce que l'Absolu ? Dieu existe-t-il ?

    Nothing escapes emptiness, neither a god nor an Absolute

    Pas de Dieu créateurCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    Tsongkhapa does not devote a treatise to denying God: together with all the Indian scholasticism he comments on, he takes for granted the Buddhist critique of an eternal creator. What occupies his work is more radical. In the Praise of Dependent Origination he venerates the Buddha precisely for having seen and taught that everything arises dependently, and in the section on special insight in the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path he carefully defines the «object of negation»: intrinsic existence, which nothing possesses. Neither a god nor an impersonal Absolute escapes this analysis; emptiness itself is empty. The buddhas, to whom he addresses prayers and praises, are not creators but beings who have completed the path; taking refuge in them is justified because they teach how to be liberated, not because they govern the world.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qui suis-je ? Existe-t-il un vrai soi ?

    The self exists only as a designation; what is negated is its intrinsic existence

    Il n'y a pas de soi permanentIl le dit expressément

    Tsongkhapa devoted much of his work to specifying exactly what is negated when one says there is no self. In the section on special insight in the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path he distinguishes the conventional self, which acts, remembers and reaps the fruits of its deeds, from the self that exists by itself, which is the «object of negation». Negating too much leads to nihilism and destroys ethics; negating too little leaves clinging intact. The person exists as a mere designation on the aggregates, and precisely for that reason it functions: if it had its own existence it could not change. The Three Principal Aspects of the Path sums up the consequence: without the wisdom that understands how things are, neither renunciation nor the mind of awakening cuts the root of existence.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi souffrons-nous ?

    The root of saṃsāra is clinging to an existence that nothing has

    Le désir et l'attachementIl le dit expressément

    The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path devotes its middle section to contemplating the suffering of cyclic existence in order to awaken renunciation: the suffering of pain, that of change and the one that pervades all that is conditioned. Its origin is the afflictions and the karma they impel, and among them attachment keeps the wheel turning. But Tsongkhapa insists that the root is not cut by renunciation or compassion alone: in the Three Principal Aspects of the Path he warns that, without the wisdom that understands how things are, the root of existence cannot be cut (verse 9). That root is the ignorance that clings to self and things as though they existed intrinsically. We suffer because we cling to what we believe solid.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Que se passe-t-il après la mort ?

    Death is certain, its hour uncertain, and only the Dharma helps

    Renaissance selon le karmaIl le dit expressément

    In the section on the initial scope of the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path, Tsongkhapa arranges the meditation on death around three roots: death is certain, its moment uncertain, and at that moment nothing helps except the Dharma. From there he moves to the sufferings of the lower destinies, to refuge and to the law of karma, because what determines the next birth is one's actions. Rebirth is not for him an inherited, unexamined belief: mind does not arise from matter but from a previous instant of the same nature, which requires a continuity before and after this life. His work also includes tantric instructions for the moment of death, such as the transference of consciousness.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Comment atteint-on la libération ou le salut ?

    A path in stages: renunciation, the mind of awakening and correct view

    Par une pratique disciplinéeIl le dit expressément

    Tsongkhapa's work is the most systematic exposition of the gradual path in Tibetan Buddhism. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path arranges practice into three scopes: that of one who seeks a good rebirth, that of one who seeks liberation from the cycle and that of one who aspires to buddhahood for the good of all. The Three Principal Aspects of the Path condenses it into renunciation, the mind of awakening and correct view of emptiness, and warns that without the last the other two do not cut the root. Wisdom is not a sudden intuition: it is cultivated by uniting mental calm and special insight, with study, reflection and analytical meditation. Monastic ethics and, at its culmination, tantra complete a path that demands discipline and perseverance.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Faut-il un maître ?

    Relying on the master is the root of the path; examining him first, too

    IndispensableIl le dit expressément

    The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path opens its practical exposition with how to rely on the spiritual master, which it presents as the root of the whole path. Tsongkhapa lists the qualities the master must have, drawing on the Ornament of the Sūtras: disciplined, serene, pacified, wiser than the disciple, with knowledge of emptiness and compassion. He asks the disciple to examine him before committing and then to serve him in thought and deed. In the tantric domain, his commentary on the Fifty Verses on the Master regulates the relationship in detail. The figure of the master is indispensable because the path is long and subtle; but it does not cancel critical study, which he himself practised rigorously on the Indian texts.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Le monde est-il réel ?

    Appearance dispels the extreme of existence; emptiness, that of nothingness

    Un réseau de causes sans substanceIl le dit expressément

    Tsongkhapa made dependent origination the centre of his work and of his devotion. In the Praise of Dependent Origination he venerates the Buddha for having seen and taught it, and in the Three Principal Aspects of the Path he formulates his most characteristic thesis: as long as the understanding of appearances, which arise dependently and do not deceive, and that of emptiness present themselves separately, one has not yet understood the Buddha's intent (verse 11). The two imply each other: precisely because things arise dependently they are empty, and because they are empty they can arise and function. Hence, he adds, appearance dispels the extreme of existence and emptiness that of non-existence (verse 13). The world is fully valid conventionally and lacks intrinsic existence.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qu'est-ce que l'amour ?

    See all as mothers swept by four rivers and take on their liberation

    Une compassion sans limitesIl le dit expressément

    In the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path, Tsongkhapa systematised the two Indian and Tibetan methods for generating the mind of awakening: the seven instructions of cause and effect, which begin by recognising all beings as mothers in previous lives, remembering their kindness and wishing to repay it, and the method of equalising and exchanging self with others, inherited from Śāntideva. From love, which wishes their happiness, arises compassion, which cannot bear their suffering, and from it the extraordinary intention to take their liberation upon oneself. The Three Principal Aspects of the Path condenses it in an image: beings are swept along by the four rivers of birth, ageing, sickness and death, and seeing this awakens the supreme mind.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Sommes-nous libres ou tout est-il déterminé ?

    Karma is certain and grows, but it can be purified and redirected

    Le karma et le choixIl le dit expressément

    In the section on the initial scope of the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path, Tsongkhapa sets out the laws of karma as the Indian tradition records them: it is certain, because happiness arises from virtue and suffering from non-virtue; it multiplies, because a small act can yield a great fruit; one does not meet what one has not done; and what has been done is not lost by itself. But this determinism is not closed: the same treatise teaches how to purify negative karma through regret, the antidote, the resolve not to repeat it and refuge. Emptiness, far from cancelling causality, is what makes it possible, because only what lacks intrinsic existence can change. Present choice is real on the conventional level.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi méditer ou prier ?

    Unite mental calm and special insight; meditation is also analysis

    Voir la réalité telle qu'elle estIl le dit expressément

    The last two sections of the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path are devoted to mental calm (śamatha) and special insight (vipaśyanā). Tsongkhapa explains how to develop stable concentration, without laxity or agitation, and how to use it to examine the nature of things. His most characteristic thesis is that analytical meditation is not an obstacle to concentration but part of it: whoever merely fixes the mind without examining does not cut the root of cyclic existence. Special insight consists in understanding emptiness with a concentrated mind, until calm and analysis sustain each other. Prayer, supplications to the lineage and tantric practice have their place, but in the service of that understanding.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • La raison peut-elle connaître l'ultime ?

    Reason decides which scripture is definitive and leads to emptiness

    L'Écriture et le raisonnementIl le dit expressément

    Tsongkhapa grants reason a larger role than almost any other Tibetan Buddhist author. In the Essence of Eloquence he addresses a classic problem: the sūtras say different things, and one must distinguish those of interpretable meaning from those of definitive meaning. That distinction cannot be made by appeal to another scripture, which would be circular, but by reasoning. Scripture is a source of knowledge, but reason interprets it. Likewise, emptiness is first understood inferentially, through analysis, and only afterwards, by meditative familiarisation, directly and non-conceptually. Hence he criticises those who scorn analysis in the name of a thought-free experience: without reasoning, meditation does not cut the root of ignorance.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Se retirer du monde ou le transformer ?

    Withdraw into solitude and fulfil your purpose soon; then reform the community

    Se retirer pour trouverIl le dit expressément

    The Three Principal Aspects of the Path ends with an exhortation: when you have understood the essential points for yourself, withdraw into solitude, rouse the strength of effort and soon fulfil your ultimate purpose (verse 14). Tsongkhapa practised what he taught: he spent years in retreat with a small group of disciples before his maturity as a teacher. But his life is not exhausted in retreat. He restored monastic discipline, founded the monastery of Ganden, instituted the Great Prayer of Lhasa in 1409, with rules he himself set, and wrote letters of advice to rulers and to the Ming emperor. Retreat is the condition of realisation; the well-ordered monastic community is the place where that realisation is preserved and transmitted.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres

Anecdotes et récits

Anecdotes et récits

Témoignage1845–1846

The tree of ten thousand images

When Tsongkhapa was three—so runs the legend the monks of Kumbum told the Lazarist missionary Évariste Huc—his mother shaved his head so that he could take up the religious life and threw the hair outside the tent. From it sprang a tree of fragrant wood on whose leaves a letter of Tibet's sacred script appeared, engraved. Centuries later the monastery of Kumbum, whose name means 'a hundred thousand images', was built on the spot. Huc and his companion Joseph Gabet spent several months there from 1845 and set out to see the marvel with sceptical eyes. They found it: an old tree, protected by a wall, on whose leaves, branches and bark well-formed Tibetan characters could be made out, more or less complete according to the age of the leaf. He wrote that they searched in vain for some fraud and gave up trying to explain it. The passage, one of the most quoted in his Souvenirs, made Kumbum known in Europe and was debated by other travellers for decades.

Origine du récit: Huc, Souvenirs d'un voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet et la Chine (1850), vol. II, chapter on Kumbum; English translation by William Hazlitt (1852), vol. 2, 'The Tree of Ten Thousand Images' (Project Gutenberg no. 33269). The legend of the tree's birth is hagiographic; the description of the tree is Huc's direct testimony. Huc's closing comment is summarised, not quoted.

Source: Huc, Évariste-Régis. Souvenirs d'un voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet et la Chine pendant les années 1844, 1845 et 1846. 2 vols. París: Adrien Le Clere, 1850 (descripción de Kumbum y del «árbol de las diez mil imágenes»).

Récit hagiographiquec. 1390–1398

Questions to Mañjuśrī

Around 1390, already a recognised scholar, Tsongkhapa met Lama Umapa, a yogi from eastern Tibet who, it was said, had seen Mañjuśrī, the bodhisattva of wisdom, since childhood. His disciples' biographies relate that Tsongkhapa began to put his hardest questions about emptiness through him and that the answers unsettled him: none of the positions he knew—neither that of the great Sakya masters nor that of the Jonang—was correct. Later, the same accounts say, he no longer needed an intermediary. The deity's advice was surprisingly practical: to stop teaching for a time, withdraw with a few disciples and accumulate merit and purification, for understanding would come from the union of practice, study of the Indian texts and reflection. The episode explains Mañjuśrī's importance in Tsongkhapa's iconography, which shows the deity's sword and book on his shoulders.

Origine du récit: Khedrup Gelek Pelzang's biographies, especially the 'secret' one (gsang ba'i rnam thar, vol. 1 of the collected works); summarised and analysed in Jinpa 2019, chs. 5–7. Tsongkhapa left a note on the signs seen at Wölkha (bka' 'bum thor bu 02.3.037) and a letter to Umapa (02.3.045).

Source: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Récit hagiographique1392–1393

The prostrations of Wölkha

The retreat Tsongkhapa began in 1392 in the Wölkha valley with eight disciples has become the Geluk model of purification. Traditional accounts measure his effort in millions of prostrations before the thirty-five confession buddhas—thirty-five sets of a hundred thousand, it is often said—and nearly two million maṇḍala offerings, until the stone on which he prostrated was marked and his hand wore down the offering base. The figures have the symbolic precision of hagiography: thirty-five echoes the number of confession buddhas, and their function is to teach that philosophical understanding requires a preparation of the heart. What his works do document is the importance he gave to the practice: his tantric writings include a visualisation of the thirty-five buddhas, and during those years he restored the Maitreya image at the nearby monastery of Dzingchi.

Origine du récit: Traditional biographies (Khedrup) and their oral circulation in Geluk monasteries; Jinpa 2019 discusses the retreat. The specific figures come from oral tradition and later biographies, not from Tsongkhapa's writings.

Source: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Récit hagiographiquec. 1397–1398

The dream of Nāgārjuna

According to the biographies, one night in 1397 or 1398, still at Wölkha, Tsongkhapa dreamed of Nāgārjuna and his five Indian disciples discussing emptiness. One of them, Buddhapālita, came up to him and touched his head with a book. The next day, while reading precisely Buddhapālita's commentary on the Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way, he reached chapter eighteen, the examination of the self, and the doubt that had accompanied him for years dissolved: he understood that emptiness is not nothingness but the absence of intrinsic existence in the very things that arise dependently. That same understanding, tradition says, inspired the Praise of Dependent Origination, in which he celebrates the Buddha for teaching dependent origination as the reason that establishes emptiness. The dream is hagiographic; the doctrinal turn towards Buddhapālita and Candrakīrti, by contrast, is visible throughout his later work.

Origine du récit: Khedrup Gelek Pelzang's biography (dad pa'i 'jug ngogs); Jinpa 2019; Thurman (ed.) 1982. The dating varies between 1397 and 1398 according to the sources.

Source: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Documenté1407–1414

The emperor's invitation

In 1407 an embassy from the Yongle emperor, the third Ming sovereign, reached central Tibet with an invitation for Tsongkhapa to visit the Chinese court. It was an offer of enormous prestige: that same year the fifth Karmapa, Deshin Shekpa, had officiated before the emperor in Nanjing. Tsongkhapa declined. His reply, preserved among his miscellaneous writings as a letter 'to the great sovereign of the Ming', courteously pleads that he cannot undertake the journey. The invitation was repeated in 1413, and again he refused; he sent his disciple Shakya Yeshe instead, who was received by the emperor and, on his return, founded Sera monastery in 1419. The episode is one of the best documented of his life and shows the distance he kept from power: he accepted the patronage of Tibetan rulers for the Great Prayer and for Ganden, but would not become an imperial chaplain.

Origine du récit: Sparham and Ehm (SEP) give the invitations of 1407 and 1413; the letter appears in the bka' 'bum thor bu (BDRC index 02.3.110). Shakya Yeshe's journey to court and the founding of Sera are documented in Geluk historiography and Chinese sources.

Source: Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.

Tradition oralefinales del s. XIV

The prayer that returned to its author

The most recited stanza in Geluk Buddhism, the Migtsema, invokes Tsongkhapa as Avalokiteśvara, source of objectless compassion, as Mañjuśrī, lord of stainless wisdom, and as Vajrapāṇi, destroyer of Māra's hosts. According to tradition, the text was not born for him. Tsongkhapa is said to have composed it in honour of his teacher Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö, placing his name in the last line; Rendawa, on reading it, replied that those qualities better suited his disciple, changed the name and sent it back. Ever since, the stanza has been addressed to 'Tsongkhapa Losang Drakpa'. The story condenses a real, documented relationship—Rendawa was his principal Madhyamaka teacher, and Tsongkhapa dedicated several praises and letters to him—and an ideal: the master who recognises that the disciple has surpassed him.

Origine du récit: An account from the Geluk tradition, recorded by Jinpa 2019 and by Lotsawa House in its introduction to the 'Prayer to Rendawa'. The praises to Rendawa appear in the bka' 'bum thor bu (02.3.004–006).

Source: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Contesté1959–1969

What remained of his body

For more than five centuries Tsongkhapa's body, preserved and covered in gold, rested in a great stūpa at Ganden, the Serdung, a pilgrimage centre for the whole Geluk world. Ganden was razed after the 1959 uprising and its buildings were dynamited during the Cultural Revolution. According to the account gathered by the journalist Thomas Laird, Red Guards forced a monk, Bomi Rinpoche, to carry the body to the pyre; the monk managed to save the skull and part of the ashes, which are kept today in the rebuilt stūpa. Another version, circulated in exile, holds that only a tooth survived, whose clay impressions were secretly distributed among the faithful. The two versions agree in essentials: Tibet's most venerated relic was destroyed and what little was saved was saved by its devotees.

Origine du récit: Laird, The Story of Tibet (2006), cited in Wikipedia's 'Ganden Monastery' article; the tooth version comes from the same encyclopaedia ('Je Tsongkhapa') and from unverified exile accounts. The exact date of the cremation could not be established.

Source: Laird, Thomas. The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama. Nueva York: Grove Press, 2006.

Enseignements

Enseignements

Les notions qui structurent sa pensée, expliquées dans leur contexte.

Stages of the path (lamrim)lamrim
The lamrim is a way of organising all the Buddha's teachings as a graded itinerary for a single person. Tsongkhapa inherited it from Atiśa's Lamp for the Path (eleventh century) and the Kadam masters, and gave it its classic form in the Lamrim Chenmo: after reliance on the teacher and reflection on the precious human birth, the practitioner goes through the topics proper to three 'types of person'. The small one seeks a good rebirth and meditates on death, the lower realms, refuge and karma; the middling one seeks liberation and meditates on the suffering of saṃsāra and its causes; the great one seeks buddhahood for others and cultivates bodhicitta, the six perfections and, finally, the union of calm abiding and special insight. The key to the method is that each stage becomes experience before moving to the next, and that no teaching is discarded: everything finds its place on one person's path.

Heir to Atiśa's Kadam tradition; the axis of Geluk training, also adopted with variations by other Tibetan schools.

Source: Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665.

The three principal aspects of the pathtres-aspectos-principales
Tsongkhapa summed up the whole path in three dispositions. The first is renunciation or the 'determination to emerge' (nges 'byung): a detachment born not of contempt for the world but of understanding that no achievement within conditioned existence is stable. The second is bodhicitta, the aspiration to awaken for the good of all beings, without which renunciation remains individual salvation. The third is the correct view (yang dag pa'i lta ba) of emptiness, without which neither renunciation nor compassion can cut the root of suffering, which is grasping at intrinsic existence. The teaching does not replace the lamrim but shows its skeleton: everything else is a means of generating these three qualities. Its most famous formulation is the fourteen-stanza letter to Tsakho Önpo Ngawang Drakpa, which ends with an exhortation to withdraw and practise.

A synthesis of the lamrim; received according to tradition as an instruction from Mañjuśrī.

Source: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

The object of negationdgag-bya
For Tsongkhapa, the most frequent error in meditating on emptiness is not knowing what is being negated. If one negates too much—the very existence of things, or their causal efficacy—one falls into nihilism and destroys the basis of ethics; if one negates too little—only a permanent substance, or a self invented by philosophies—innate grasping remains intact. Hence his insistence on identifying the object of negation (dgag bya) precisely: intrinsic existence, existence from the thing's own side, which the ordinary mind spontaneously projects onto persons and phenomena. What is negated is not the chair, but the chair as existing by itself. This doctrine, developed in the special-insight section of the Lamrim Chenmo, was at the centre of the great controversies with later Sakya authors such as Gorampa and Shākya Chokden, who accused him of negating too little.

Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka; Tibetan scholastic controversy of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.

Source: Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.

Emptiness and dependent originationorigen-dependiente-vacuidad
The core of Tsongkhapa's philosophy is the equivalence between emptiness and dependent origination that Nāgārjuna had formulated and that he reads through Buddhapālita and Candrakīrti. Things are empty of intrinsic existence precisely because they arise in dependence on causes, parts and conceptual designation; and because they are empty, they can arise, change and produce effects. Emptiness is therefore neither a reality hidden behind appearances nor nothingness, but the mode of being of appearances themselves. Hence, according to Tsongkhapa, conventional truth retains its full validity: there are correct and incorrect perceptions, virtuous and harmful actions, although nothing exists by itself. The Praise of Dependent Origination celebrates the Buddha precisely for teaching this compatibility, and the Three Principal Aspects places the completion of analysis in it.

Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka in Candrakīrti's Prāsaṅgika interpretation.

Source: Tsongkhapa. Ocean of Reasoning: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Trad. Geshe Ngawang Samten y Jay L. Garfield. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780195147339.

The eight difficult pointsocho-puntos-dificiles
Tsongkhapa held that Candrakīrti's Prāsaṅgika school is distinguished from the others by a set of 'difficult' theses which he fixed in a list of eight, recorded by Gyaltsab in his notes and developed in Illuminating the Intent. According to Sparham and Ehm's summary, they concern the bases (rejection, even conventionally, of self-defined particulars; rejection of the storehouse consciousness; conventional acceptance of external objects), the path (rejection of autonomous reasoning as a means to understand reality; rejection of reflexive awareness; the way the two obscurations exist; the understanding of absence of own-nature by śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas) and the result (how a buddha knows conventional things). The list shaped all Geluk teaching of Madhyamaka and was criticised by other schools, which saw in it a construction more Tibetan than Indian.

Tibetan Madhyamaka doxography.

Source: Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.

Union of calm abiding and special insightshamatha-vipashyana
The last two sections of the Lamrim Chenmo deal with calm abiding (śamatha), stable and clear concentration, and special insight (vipaśyanā), the analysis that understands emptiness. Tsongkhapa insists that neither suffices on its own: concentration without analysis does not cut grasping, and analysis without concentration does not stabilise. The goal is their union, in which analysis itself induces stability. In this context he sharply criticises the idea that awakening consists in suspending all thought, which Tibetans associated with the Chinese master Heshang Moheyan, protagonist of the eighth-century Samye debate: for Tsongkhapa the mere absence of concepts is a state of concentration, not an understanding, and confusing the two is one of the greatest dangers of the path.

The final section of the Lamrim Chenmo and the Middle-Length Lamrim; Tibetan polemic against the 'sudden' model attributed to Chan.

Source: Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665.

Vidéos

Vidéos

Enregistrements, entretiens et documentaires. Les vidéos sont lues depuis YouTube ; elles ne sont pas hébergées ici.

  • Thupten Jinpa PhD - "Tsongkhapa: Philosopher, Teacher and Yogi"

    Conférence· EN· 138 min

    Tse Chen Ling Center

  • Thubten Jinpa | Tsongkhapa: Philosopher, Teacher & Yogi

    Conférence· EN· 143 min

    Jamyang Buddhist Centre

  • Tsongkhapa's Vision of Manjushri in Wölkha – Thupten Jinpa PhD

    Conférence· EN· 90 min

    Tse Chen Ling Center

  • Mystical Dimensions of Tsongkhapa with Thupten Jinpa (Full Talk)

    Conférence· EN· 43 min

    Sacred Stream

  • Thupten Jinpa on Tsongkhapa and Negating Too Much

    Analyse· EN· 8 min

    Wisdom Publications Inc.Chaîne officielle

  • Robert Thurman - "The Life and Legacy of Lama Tsongkhapa"

    Conférence· EN· 119 min

    Tse Chen Ling Center

  • What is Tsongkhapa's Essence of True Eloquence? Robert A.F. Thurman Exploring Buddhism

    Conférence· EN· 117 min

    Tibet House US NYC | Menla Resort OnlineChaîne officielle

  • “Three Principal Aspects of the Path" & "Concise Stages of the Path to Enlightenment"

    Conférence· EN· 71 min

    Dalai LamaChaîne officielle

  • «Los Tres Aspectos Principales del Camino» y el «Lamrim Abreviado», de Tsongkhapa

    Conférence· ES· 71 min

    El Dalái LamaChaîne officielle

  • Tsongkhapa's "Praise to Dependent Origination"

    Conférence· EN· 171 min

    Dalai Lama Archive

  • Day6-pm: Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment

    Conférence· EN· 117 min

    Dalai LamaChaîne officielle

  • Las cualidades especiales de las enseñanzas de Lama Tsong Khapa

    Conférence· ES· 80 min

    FPMT EspañolChaîne officielle

  • La Vida de Lama Tsongkhapa - Dr. Alexander Berzin

    Enregistrement de tiers· ES· 22 min

    Narraciones Budismo

Galerie

Galerie

Images dont la licence a été vérifiée. Chacune conserve son auteur et son attribution.

Manuscrits

Manuscrits

Témoins manuscrits et textes anciens, avec leur dépositaire et leurs conditions de consultation.

  • BO · Tibetano (dbu can) · 1388–1419

    རྗེ་ཙོང་ཁ་པའི་གསུང་འབུམ། (gsung 'bum, bkras lhun par rnying)

    Témoin conservé
    Xilografía de las planchas antiguas de Tashi Lhunpo, 18 vols.; reimpresión fotográfica de Dharamsala (Sherig Parkhang), 1997
    Dépositaire
    Buddhist Digital Resource Center (BDRC), copia digital · bdr:MW29193 (índice bdr:O2DB2379)
    Numérisation
    library.bdrc.io/show/bdr:MW29193…
Manuscrits →

Relations

Relations

Influences, filiations et affinités. On distingue la relation documentée de la similitude identifiée par analyse.

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Nāgārjuna

    His philosophy is a reading of Nāgārjuna; the Ocean of Reasoning comments chapter by chapter on the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, and he also annotated the Sixty Stanzas of Reasoning.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Śāntideva

    He taught and annotated the wisdom chapter of the Bodhicaryāvatāra and the Śikṣāsamuccaya (vols. 14 and 16 of his works); Śāntideva is one of the sources of the great-scope lamrim.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha

    The Praise of Dependent Origination addresses the Buddha as unsurpassed teacher for teaching dependent origination; the Essence of Eloquence is a hermeneutics of his words.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Milarepa

    A lineage relationship, not a personal one: the six yogas of Nāropa that Tsongkhapa expounded in the Book of Three Inspirations are the cycle Marpa transmitted to Milarepa, which he received at Kagyu centres such as Drikung.

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    The 14th Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso)

    The 14th Dalai Lama, spiritual head of the Geluk lineage descending from Tsongkhapa through his disciple Gendun Drub (1st Dalai Lama), has taught and commented on the Lamrim Chenmo (From Here to Enlightenment, 2012), the Three Principal Aspects and the Great Exposition of Secret Mantra.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Bodhidharma

    An indirect, not historical, relationship: the Lamrim Chenmo criticises the concept-free meditation that Tibetan tradition attributed to the Chan master Heshang Moheyan (Samye debate, eighth century), heir of the school that claimed descent from Bodhidharma. Tsongkhapa does not mention Bodhidharma.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

  • Disciple de

    Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö (1349–1412)

    His principal teacher of Madhyamaka and Abhidharma; he dedicated praises, letters and an instruction to him (vols. 2, 12 and 14).

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Atiśa Dīpaṃkara Śrījñāna

    The Lamrim Chenmo develops Atiśa's Lamp for the Path to Enlightenment and the Kadam tradition.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Candrakīrti

    His principal authority in Madhyamaka; Illuminating the Intent comments on his Entering the Middle Way.

    Relation documentée

  • Maître de

    Gyaltsab Darma Rinchen (1364–1432)

    Chief disciple and first holder of the Ganden throne; he recorded several of his teachings in writing.

    Relation documentée

  • Maître de

    Khedrup Gelek Pelzang (1385–1438)

    Disciple and author of his principal biographies; retrospectively, the first Panchen Lama.

    Relation documentée

  • Maître de

    Gendun Drub (1391–1474)

    Disciple, founder of Tashi Lhunpo and posthumously recognised as the first Dalai Lama.

    Relation documentée

  • A correspondu avec

    Emperador Yongle (dinastía Ming)

    He invited him to court in 1407 and 1413; Tsongkhapa declined by letter.

    Relation documentée

Sources

Sources

Bibliographie et catalogues consultés pour cette fiche.

  1. Wikidata, «Tsongkhapa», QID Q323439 (VIAF 65296968; LCCN n80017690; BDRC bdr:P64; Treasury of Lives 8986).
  2. Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.
  3. Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.
  4. Buddhist Digital Resource Center (BDRC). gsung 'bum/ tsong kha pa (bkras lhun par rnying / d+ha sar bskyar par brgyab pa), reimpresión de las planchas antiguas de Tashi Lhunpo, Dharamsala, 1997, 18 vols., instancia bdr:MW29193, índice bdr:O2DB2379 (contenido volumen por volumen).
  5. Thurman, Robert A. F. (ed.). The Life and Teachings of Tsong Khapa. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1982; nueva ed. 2006, ISBN 9788186470442. Incluye la traducción de la biografía tradicional y de varias obras breves.
  6. Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665.
  7. Tsongkhapa. Ocean of Reasoning: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Trad. Geshe Ngawang Samten y Jay L. Garfield. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780195147339.
  8. Thurman, Robert A. F. Tsong Khapa's Speech of Gold in the Essence of True Eloquence: Reason and Enlightenment in the Central Philosophy of Tibet. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. ISBN 9780691072852 (reed. como The Central Philosophy of Tibet, 1991, ISBN 9780691020679).
  9. Jinpa, Thupten. Self, Reality and Reason in Tibetan Philosophy: Tsongkhapa's Quest for the Middle Way. Londres: RoutledgeCurzon, 2002.
  10. Ary, Elijah S. Authorized Lives: Biography and the Early Formation of Geluk Identity. Somerville (MA): Wisdom Publications, 2015.
  11. Laird, Thomas. The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama. Nueva York: Grove Press, 2006.
  12. Wikipedia (en). «Je Tsongkhapa», «Ganden Monastery» y «Monlam Prayer Festival». Usadas como índice de traducciones y bibliografía secundaria; contrastadas con t2, t3 y t4.
  13. Wikimedia Commons, API imageinfo (licencia, autor, fecha y descripción de cada fichero citado en images[]).
  14. Open Library (Internet Archive). Registros de ISBN de cada edición citada en works[].
  15. Huc, Évariste-Régis. Souvenirs d'un voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet et la Chine pendant les années 1844, 1845 et 1846. 2 vols. París: Adrien Le Clere, 1850 (descripción de Kumbum y del «árbol de las diez mil imágenes»).
  16. Ium, Michael. «Tsongkhapa as a mahāsiddha». Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 45 (2022): 73–117. doi:10.2143/JIABS.45.0.3291577.
  17. Kilty, Gavin (trad.). The Splendor of an Autumn Moon: The Devotional Verse of Tsongkhapa. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2001. ISBN 9780861711925.
  18. Mullin, Glenn H. Tsongkhapa's Six Yogas of Naropa. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 1996. ISBN 9781559390583.
  19. Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso). From Here to Enlightenment: An Introduction to Tsong-kha-pa's Classic Text The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Ed. y trad. Guy Newland. Boston: Snow Lion, 2012. Trad. esp.: De aquí a la iluminación, Madrid: Gaia Ediciones, 2014, ISBN 9788484454854.
  20. YouTube: conferencias y documentales verificados por oEmbed el 2026-10-25 (detalle en videos[]).
  21. Lotsawa House. «Three Principal Aspects of the Path» (lam gyi gtso bo rnam gsum), texto tibetano con colofón; y presentación de «Prayer to Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö».
Ayant droit
Obra original en dominio público (m. 1419). Las traducciones modernas tienen derechos propios: Shambhala Publications/Snow Lion (Lamrim Chenmo; Gran exposición del mantra secreto; Seis yogas), Wisdom Publications (Iluminación del pensamiento, Lamrim medio, Lámpara de las cinco etapas, ética tántrica), Oxford University Press (Océano de razonamiento), Princeton University Press (Esencia de la elocuencia), SUNY Press, Ediciones Dharma (versión española del Lamrim Chenmo), Gaia Ediciones.

En attente de confirmation

Ce que cette fiche n'a pas encore pu établir. Nous préférons le dire plutôt que de combler.

  • Sala de lectura: no se ha encontrado ningún texto de Tsongkhapa en dominio público con texto completo en Gutenberg, Wikisource (inglés, chino, multilingüe) ni Internet Archive con OCR limpio. Todas las traducciones occidentales son posteriores a 1970 y la china de Fazun (m. 1980) tiene derechos en la UE y en España. El texto tibetano original (libre en todas partes) solo está en BDRC, que el importador no lee. Revisar si BDRC o el ACIP ofrecen e-textos importables.
  • Ediciones españolas: solo se han verificado en catálogo las de Ediciones Dharma (Lamrim Chenmo, 2000, 2007, 2011; el catálogo no indica qué volumen es cada una) y el comentario del Dalái Lama (Gaia, 2014). No se ha localizado con ISBN una edición española de Los tres aspectos principales, la Alabanza del origen dependiente ni de la Gran exposición del mantra secreto.
  • Las obras secundarias de las obras completas (vols. 1–12, 14–18) se han registrado a partir del índice de BDRC; sus títulos se han traducido y descrito según el título y el género, sin lectura del texto. Algunas identificaciones quedan por confirmar: 01.09 (zhu lan sman mchog), 07.6 («Los cuatrocientos cincuenta»), 11.07 (a tsa la gar b+ha), 14.4 (relación con el Lamrim medio) y 02.3.056 (identificación con Yon tan gzhir gyur ma).
  • Los textos del vol. 1 que son biografías de Tsongkhapa escritas por discípulos (01.01–01.04, entre ellas las de Khedrup) y el colofón de impresión del vol. 13 no se registran como obras suyas; se mencionan en la entrada «gsung-bum».
  • Fechas: ordenación completa (c. 1381) y novicio (c. 1363) proceden de la tradición biográfica resumida en Jinpa 2019; no se ha podido leer el libro directamente. Treasury of Lives (8986) devuelve 403 a clientes automáticos.
  • Citas: el texto tibetano de Los tres aspectos principales se ha cotejado con Lotsawa House; las traducciones al español e inglés son del investigador. La primera estrofa de la Alabanza del origen dependiente se da de memoria y está marcada como «probable»: cotejar con una edición.
  • Relación con Padmasambhava: no se ha documentado ninguna relación directa entre ambos (separados por seis siglos y escuelas distintas); no se registra.
  • Duraciones de vídeo tomadas de la página de resultados de YouTube; el año de publicación no se ha registrado (la API oEmbed no lo devuelve).

Recherche effectuée le 2026-10-25