Skip to content
The ConsciousLibrary

Buddhism · Mahayana · Zen / Chan

Huineng

惠能 / 慧能 · 六祖大鑒禪師 · 慧能 (Enō)

638 – 713Historicity debated

Chinese monk of the Tang dynasty, venerated as the sixth patriarch of Chan and founder of the “sudden awakening” school. Tradition presents him as an illiterate woodcutter who defeated his master's chief disciple with a poem and received Bodhidharma's robe; modern scholarship has shown that this biography was built by his follower Shenhui. The Platform Sūtra attributed to him is the founding work of Chan and Zen.

Read the life Ask
works
11works
editions
25editions
quotes
8quotes
videos
12videos
images
5images
Daikan Zenji (Huineng), templo Shōfukuji

Daikan Zenji (Huineng), templo Shōfukuji · Public domain

In their words

«Among people there are northerners and southerners; in buddha-nature there is neither north nor south. A barbarian's body is not like Your Reverence's, but what difference is there in buddha-nature?»

Sūtra de la plataforma, versión de Dunhuang, respuesta a Hongren (§3 de Yampolsky). Traducción propia del chino clásico.

The Platform Sūtra of the Sixth Patriarch — Huineng

Their central idea

Buddha-nature is equally present in everyone, regardless of origin, culture or learning: awakening is not a conquest but the recognition of what one already is.

See in context

Biography

5 min read

The patriarch who had to be invented

Few figures in Buddhism are as famous and as uncertain as Huineng, the “sixth patriarch” of Chan. Tradition knows almost everything about him: that he was an illiterate woodcutter from south China, that he awakened on hearing a line of the Diamond Sūtra, that he defeated his master's chief disciple with a poem and received Bodhidharma's robe at night. History, by contrast, knows very little: that there was a monk named Huineng, a disciple of the fifth patriarch Hongren, who taught at Caoxi in northern Canton and died in 713 with a rather regional reputation. Everything else was written later, and largely out of necessity: that of a school seeking a founder to the measure of its doctrine.

The life the sūtra tells

The canonical account is the autobiography that opens the Platform Sūtra. Huineng, surnamed Lu, was born in 638 in Xinzhou, in present-day Guangdong; his father, an official from Fanyang demoted and banished to the south, died early, and the boy supported his mother by selling firewood in the market of Nanhai. One day, delivering a bundle to an inn, he heard a customer recite the Diamond Sūtra and his mind “opened”. He thus learned that Hongren was teaching at Huangmei, travelled to him and, when the master scorned him as a “southern barbarian”, answered that people are from the north or the south, but buddha-nature is not. Hongren sent him to husk rice at the mill, far from the meditation hall, and there he spent eight months.

The poems on the wall

The central episode is a contest. Hongren asks his disciples for a poem showing their understanding, and promises the robe to whoever has it. Shenxiu, the most respected monk, writes at night on the corridor wall: the body is the tree of awakening, the mind a mirror on its stand; it must be wiped constantly so that no dust settles. Huineng, who cannot read, asks to have it read to him and dictates his reply. In the Dunhuang copy there are two stanzas, the first of which says that awakening has no tree, the mirror has no stand and, buddha-nature being always pure, there is nowhere for dust to settle. Only the editions of the tenth to thirteenth centuries put in his mouth the line everyone knows: “from the beginning there is not a single thing.” The difference is not minor: Zen's most quoted formula is not its oldest.

The robe and the flight

Hongren, the story goes, erases the poem to protect its author, comes to the mill at night, expounds the Diamond Sūtra to him and hands him the robe and bowl, signs of the transmission. He accompanies him to the river and advises him to flee. At the Dayu pass a former general, Huiming, overtakes him to seize the robe and cannot lift it from the ground; the later version adds that Huineng asked him what his original face was before thinking of good and evil. The later editions have him live fifteen years hidden among hunters, eating vegetables cooked in their meat pots, before appearing at the Faxing temple in Canton, where two monks were arguing whether the banner or the wind was moving: “neither the wind nor the banner; what moves is your mind.” The temple's master, Yinzong, is said to have ordained him then.

The sermon at Dafan

The text that made him famous presents itself as the transcript of a sermon at the Dafan temple in Shaozhou, before the prefect Wei Qu, monks, scholars and over a thousand listeners, recorded by his disciple Fahai. It teaches that awakening is sudden because one's own nature is already pure, that meditation and wisdom are one thing—like the lamp and its light—and that the method is summed up in no-thought, no-form and no-abiding: not suppressing thoughts, but not being caught in them. It also confers “formless precepts” and criticises seated meditation that amounts to not moving. Huineng died in 713 at the Guoen temple in his home town, aged seventy-six according to the sūtra, and his body was taken to Caoxi; the one venerated at the Nanhua temple as his mummy was already seen by the Jesuit Matteo Ricci in 1589.

Shenhui and the making of the sixth patriarch

Modern criticism began around 1930, when the philosopher Hu Shi found among the Dunhuang manuscripts the works of Shenhui (684–758), a monk who claimed to be Huineng's disciple. In 732, at a public assembly at Huatai, Shenhui accused the school of Shenxiu—the most powerful in the capital—of usurping the succession: Hongren's true heir was his own master, the unknown southerner, and the true teaching was the sudden, not the gradual. Hu Shi concluded that the Platform Sūtra itself was the work of Shenhui or his circle; the Dunhuang copy even contains a prophecy that, twenty years after the master's death, someone would risk his life to defend his doctrine, which is exactly what Shenhui did. Philip Yampolsky, who edited and translated the Dunhuang text in 1967, nuanced the thesis: the sūtra was composed around 780, from materials of diverse origin; Yanagida Seizan proposed that its compiler belonged to the Oxhead school, an idea John McRae adopted. McRae, in his studies of the Northern school and in Seeing through Zen, showed that the opposition between sudden and gradual was above all a polemical weapon, and formulated the rule by which Huineng is read today: it is not true, and therefore it is more important.

Three versions of one book

The Platform Sūtra is the only Chinese text by a master to receive the title jing, “sūtra”, reserved for the Buddha's word, and it never stopped growing. The oldest surviving copy, found at Dunhuang and now in the British Library, dates from the mid-ninth century and has some twelve thousand characters; other Dunhuang copies survive in China. In 967 the monk Huixin reorganised it into two fascicles and eleven sections, a version preserved in Japan; in 1056 Qisong prepared another, now lost; and in 1291 Zongbao published the one that would become canonical, of more than twenty thousand characters in ten chapters, with the episodes of the hunters, the banner and the original face. Morten Schlütter has shown that these enlargements answered the disputes of the Chan schools of the Song period. In the thirteenth century Dōgen rejected it as apocryphal; the Linji lineage, from which Hakuin's Zen descends, and the Caodong lineage, from which Dōgen's and Shunryu Suzuki's descends, still recognise in Huineng their common root.

Sources: Yampolsky, Philip B. (ed. y trad.). The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch: The Text of the Tun-huang Manuscript. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 1967; reed. 2012 (ISBN 9780231159562). · McRae, John R. Seeing through Zen: Encounter, Transformation, and Genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. ISBN 0520237986. · McRae, John R. (trad.). The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch, translated from the Chinese of Tsung-pao. Berkeley: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, 2000. ISBN 1886439133. · McRae, John R. The Northern School and the Formation of Early Ch'an Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press (Kuroda Institute), 1986. · Schlütter, Morten y Stephen F. Teiser (eds.). Readings of the Platform Sūtra. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 2012. ISBN 9780231158206.

Timeline

A life, year by year

Each point is a documented event. Click to read it, with its source and degree of certainty.

  1. 638 · age 0

    Birth in Xinzhou

    Born in Xinzhou (Guangdong) into the Lu family; his father, an official from Fanyang, had been demoted and banished to the south.

    Tradition

  2. c. 661

    Reaches Huangmei and meets Hongren

    After hearing the Diamond Sūtra he travels to Mount Huangmei; Hongren sends him to the mill. Date inferred from traditional chronology.

    Tradition

  3. c. 661

    Poem contest and transmission of the robe

    He answers Shenxiu's poem, receives the robe at night and flees south.

    Tradition

  4. c. 676

    Ordination at the Faxing temple

    After years in hiding he appears in Canton during the wind-and-banner dispute and is ordained by Yinzong; Wang Wei's stele already mentions Yinzong.

    Tradition

  5. c. 677

    Teaches at Caoxi

    He settles at the Baolin temple (now Nanhua) at Caoxi, near Shaozhou, where he will teach until his death.

    Probable

  6. c. 700

    The sermon at the Dafan temple

    According to the sūtra, he preaches before prefect Wei Qu and over a thousand listeners; Fahai records the sermon. Date unknown.

    Tradition

  7. 713 · age 76

    Death at the Guoen temple

    He dies on the third day of the eighth month of the second Xiantian year, aged seventy-six according to the sūtra; his body is taken to Caoxi.

    Documented

  8. 732

    Shenhui at Huatai

    At a public assembly Shenhui proclaims Huineng sixth patriarch and attacks Shenxiu's school; the construction of the figure begins.

    Documented

  9. c. 780

    Compilation of the Platform Sūtra

    Date proposed by Yampolsky for the composition of the text preserved at Dunhuang.

    Probable

  10. 796

    The court recognises the Southern line

    According to Zongmi, an imperial commission recognises the Southern school as the orthodox transmission and Shenhui as seventh patriarch.

    Probable

  11. c. 816

    Posthumous title Dajian

    Emperor Xianzong grants him the title Chan Master Dajian, “Great Mirror”; Liu Zongyuan composes the stele.

    Probable

  12. 967

    Huixin's version

    Huixin reorganises the sūtra into two fascicles and eleven sections.

    Documented

  13. 1291

    Zongbao's version

    Zongbao publishes the edition that will enter the Ming canon and become canonical.

    Documented

  14. 1589

    Matteo Ricci at the Nanhua temple

    The Jesuit sees the mummified body venerated as Huineng's and describes it in his journals.

    Documented

  15. 1930

    Hu Shi and modern criticism

    Hu Shi publishes Shenhui's works found at Dunhuang and attributes the Platform Sūtra to his circle.

    Documented

  16. 1967

    Yampolsky's edition

    Philip Yampolsky publishes the Dunhuang text with translation and study; the same year Yanagida Seizan's study of early Chan histories appears.

    Documented

Works

Essential works

The works without which their legacy cannot be understood.

The Platform Sūtra of the Sixth Patriarch — Huineng

Later compilation · c. 780

The Platform Sūtra of the Sixth Patriarch

六祖壇經 (Liuzu tanjing) · 六祖大師法寶壇經 (Liuzu dashi fabao tanjing) · título de Dunhuang: 南宗頓教最上大乘摩訶般若波羅蜜經六祖惠能大師於韶州大梵寺施法壇經

The master's autobiography (the woodcutter, the poem contest, the transmission of the robe), a sermon on wisdom (prajñā), the formless precepts, the unity of meditation and wisdom and the triple principle of no-thought, no-form and no-abiding, followed by dialogues with disciples and the account of his death. It is the only text by a Chinese master to bear the title of sūtra and the founding work of all later Chan and Zen.

Buy the book View the book Read the full text

13 editions · amazon.com

Platform Sūtra: the Dunhuang version — Huineng

Manuscript · c. 780

Platform Sūtra: the Dunhuang version

南宗頓教最上大乘摩訶般若波羅蜜經六祖惠能大師於韶州大梵寺施法壇經一卷 (copia Stein 5475 y otras de Dunhuang)

Some twelve thousand characters in a single fascicle, without chapters (Suzuki and Yampolsky divided it into 57 sections). Huineng answers Shenxiu with two stanzas, not with the famous “from the beginning there is not a single thing”; the episodes of the hunters, the banner and the original face are missing. Its language is full of copying errors that scholars have had to correct.

Buy the book View the book

3 editions · amazon.com

Critical edition · 1291

Platform Sūtra: the Zongbao version (1291)

六祖大師法寶壇經 (versión de Zongbao 宗寶, 1291; Taishō n.º 2008)

Ten chapters and over twenty thousand characters: it adds the fifteen years among hunters, the wind-and-banner episode, the question to Huiming about his original face and many dialogues with disciples. It is the basis of the first English translation (Wong Mou-lam, 1930) and of McRae's (2000).

Buy the book View the book Read the full text

3 editions · amazon.com

Complete works (11)

Quotations

Quotations located in a specific work. Each carries its provenance and its level of confidence.

Among people there are northerners and southerners; in buddha-nature there is neither north nor south. A barbarian's body is not like Your Reverence's, but what difference is there in buddha-nature?

人即有南北，佛性即無南北；獵獠身與和尚不同，佛性有何差別？

VerifiedSūtra de la plataforma, versión de Dunhuang, respuesta a Hongren (§3 de Yampolsky). Traducción propia del chino clásico.

1 / 8

Essential ideas (editorial summary)

Out of respect for copyright, these ideas are summarised in our own words and are not presented as literal quotations.

  • Buddha-nature is equally present in everyone, regardless of origin, culture or learning: awakening is not a conquest but the recognition of what one already is.
  • Awakening is sudden because there is nothing to build: what gradual practice tries to polish is already pure; the degrees lie in people, not in the truth.
  • Meditating is not blanking the mind nor staying motionless: it is not being caught in thoughts while thinking, not stopping at any form while perceiving.
  • Meditation and wisdom are not two stages but the substance and function of the same thing, like the lamp and its light.
  • The Pure Land, the Buddha and the precepts are not outside: if the mind is pure, the place where one stands is the Pure Land.
Apocryphal quotes or disputed attributions (1)

  • «From the beginning there is not a single thing.»

    Huineng's most famous line does not appear in the oldest copy of the Platform Sūtra (Dunhuang, ninth century), where the third line says that buddha-nature is always pure; it appears in the Huixin (967) and Zongbao (1291) versions. It is not false as a text of the tradition, but it cannot safely be attributed to the historical Huineng.

Last words

Traditional attribution

«Stay well; now I take leave of you. When I am gone, do not weep after the fashion of the world… When I am gone, simply practise according to the Dharma and it will be as when I was alive; if I remained in the world and you disobeyed the teaching, there would be no use in my staying.»

汝等好住，今共汝別。吾去以後，莫作世情悲泣……吾去以後，但依法修行，共吾在日一種；吾若在世，汝違教法，吾住無益。

Final words that the Dunhuang copy of the Platform Sūtra attributes to Huineng at the Guoen temple in Xinzhou, in the eighth month of the second Xiantian year (713), after reciting the “verse of true liberation in seeing the buddha of one's own nature”; the text adds that he died in the third watch of the night, aged seventy-six. It is an account composed decades later; the Zongbao version expands it. Translation by the researcher from the Chinese.

Source: Wikisource en chino: 南宗頓教最上大乘摩訶般若波羅蜜經六祖惠能大師於韶州大梵寺施法壇經 (texto de la copia de Dunhuang, compilado por Fahai).

Ask

What their work answers

Twelve great human questions and what their texts allow us to answer, with references. We never put words in their mouth.

  • What is the Absolute? Does God exist?

    The buddha is in one's own nature, ever pure, not outside

    An impersonal AbsoluteStated explicitly

    The Platform Sūtra, which presents itself as Huineng's sermon recorded by his disciple Fahai but is a later compilation, locates the ultimate in each person's «own nature» (zixing). In the Dunhuang version it invites listeners to take refuge in the three bodies of the buddha within their own body: the buddha is not outside but in one's own nature, which is ever pure. No creator god appears, nor any being who governs the world; nor an Absolute that could be spoken of as an object, since one's own nature is seen, not defined. The most famous verse, in Zongbao's late version, sums it up by saying that from the beginning there is not a single thing.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • Who am I? Is there a true self?

    Seeing one's own nature is buddhahood: the original face, prior to good and evil

    The Self is the AbsoluteStated explicitly

    The Platform Sūtra turns on one formula: seeing one's own nature (jianxing) and attaining buddhahood. That nature does not distinguish between north and south, between a barbarian and an abbot, as Huineng answers Hongren in the Dunhuang version; it is complete in each person and ever pure. What is taken for the self, the one that clings to thoughts and forms, is the confusion that hides it: when one is confused, the buddha is a living being; when one awakens, the living being is buddha. Zongbao's late version condenses the question in the scene at the Dayu pass: without thinking of good or evil, at this very moment, what is your original face? The true self is not the ego but that awakened nature.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • Why do we suffer?

    Confused, we are suffering beings; awakened, we are buddhas

    Ignorance of what we areInferred from their doctrine

    The Platform Sūtra does not develop a theory of suffering: it locates it in confusion (mi) about one's own nature. In the Dunhuang version, the difference between the ordinary being and the buddha is only one of confusion and awakening; one confused thought suffices to be an ordinary being and one awakened thought to be a buddha. Confusion consists in being caught in thoughts, in stopping at forms and in seeking outside what is within: a buddha, a Pure Land, merit. Hence the method is summed up in no-thought, no-form and no-abiding. We suffer because we do not know what we are and identify with what passes through the mind, not because there is anything to purify in a nature that is already pure.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • What happens after death?

    One's own nature is neither born nor dies; there is no reason to weep

    What I am is never born and never diesStated explicitly

    The Platform Sūtra narrates Huineng's farewell at its end. When he announces his death and some disciples weep, he rebukes them: if they knew where he was going, they would not weep; the nature of the Dharma has neither birth nor extinction, neither going nor coming. He leaves them a verse and asks that after his departure they hold no lamentations and wear no mourning, since that is not in accord with the teaching. Zongbao's version places the same theme at the beginning: on hearing the Diamond Sūtra, Huineng exclaims that one's own nature is pure from the origin and neither arises nor perishes. Death affects what is composed and dissolves; what the sermon invites one to see never began. The text does not dwell on rebirth, which it takes for granted for those who remain confused.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • How is liberation or salvation attained?

    Sudden awakening: seeing one's own nature, with no degrees in the truth

    Through direct knowledgeStated explicitly

    The Platform Sūtra defends sudden awakening against gradual practice. In the verse contest that opens the story, Shenxiu compares the mind to a mirror that must be cleaned ceaselessly, and Huineng answers that buddha-nature is always pure: there is no dust to remove. What liberates is seeing one's own nature, and that happens all at once, because there is nothing to build; the degrees, says the sermon, lie in people, not in the teaching. Meditation and wisdom are one body: meditation is the substance of wisdom and wisdom the function of meditation. It is not a matter of emptying the mind, but of not being caught in thoughts while thinking.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • Is a teacher necessary?

    Confused, the master ferries us across; awakened, we cross alone

    The teacher is withinStated explicitly

    The Platform Sūtra acknowledges the role of the good spiritual friend and at the same time relativises it. The sermon explains that wisdom is in each person from the beginning; if someone cannot awaken by themselves, they should seek a great friend to show them the way to see their nature, but that friend only points to what is already within. Zongbao's version condenses this in the boat scene: when Hongren offers to row him across, Huineng replies that when one is in error the master ferries us to the other shore, and once awakened we cross alone. The story is also a legitimation: Huineng receives Hongren's robe, despite being an illiterate woodcutter, because he has seen his nature.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • Is the world real?

    The myriad phenomena are in one's own nature: not the wind, it is the mind

    Manifestation of the divineStated explicitly

    The Platform Sūtra states that the myriad phenomena are in one's own nature, as the sky contains the sun, moon and stars: the nature of mind is vast as space and embraces everything, good and bad, without clinging to anything. The world is not rejected or considered a deception; it is seen from the nature that contains it. Zongbao's version adds the scene at the Faxing temple, where two monks argue whether the wind or the banner is moving, and Huineng tells them that what moves is their mind. What we call the world depends on how the mind looks at it: confused, it scatters into things; awakened, it sees them arise from its own nature without stopping at them.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • What is love?

    Saving the countless beings of one's own mind: the vow is made within

    Boundless compassionInferred from their doctrine

    The Platform Sūtra incorporates the four great bodhisattva vows, the first of which is to save all beings, but gives them a characteristic twist. In the Dunhuang version, Huineng asks the assembly to make the vow to save the countless beings of one's own mind: confused, deceitful, evil or jealous ideas are the beings to be liberated, and each must be liberated by means of one's own nature. Compassion does not disappear, but becomes inseparable from awakening: whoever sees their nature also liberates others. Zongbao's version goes so far as to say that compassion is Avalokiteśvara and generous joy is Mahāsthāmaprāpta: the bodhisattvas are qualities of the mind, not external figures.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • Are we free, or is everything determined?

    He does not debate free will: confusion and awakening are decided in each thought

    Did not address it

    The Platform Sūtra does not raise the question of free will or determinism, and hardly deals with karma. What it says nearby is something else: the difference between confusion and awakening is decided in each thought. A confused thought makes one an ordinary being; the next, awakened, makes one a buddha. The practice of no-thought does not consist in suppressing thinking but in not being caught in any thought, so that the mind is not swept along by what arises. From this one can infer a form of freedom that is not choosing between alternatives but not being carried away. But it would be forcing the text to attribute to it a doctrine of will or destiny.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • Why meditate or pray?

    Sitting motionless is not meditation: not stopping at any thought is

    Meditation is not a techniqueStated explicitly

    The Platform Sūtra criticises those who believe that meditating is sitting without moving and emptying the mind. According to the sermon, this practice turns meditation into one more form of attachment, and it recalls that Vimalakīrti rebuked Śāriputra for sitting in repose in the forest. Huineng redefines the terms: «sitting» means that no thoughts arise before any external object, and «meditation» means seeing one's own nature within without agitation. Meditation and wisdom are one body, like the lamp and its light. Practice is not a technique repeated to reach another state, but not being caught in thoughts while thinking, in any activity. External prayer does not save either: the Pure Land is in the pure mind.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • Can reason know the ultimate?

    An illiterate woodcutter sees his nature: truth does not depend on letters

    The ultimate lies beyond the mindStated explicitly

    The Platform Sūtra's story is itself an answer: Huineng, a woodcutter from the south who cannot read, hears the Diamond Sūtra recited and awakens; later he dictates his verse because he cannot write it, and surpasses the scholar Shenxiu. The sermon explains that wisdom is in each person from the beginning and that the sūtras are in one's own nature: whoever does not see it, though they recite, does not understand. Zongbao's version formulates it in the dialogue with the nun Wujinzang: the subtle meaning of the buddhas has nothing to do with letters. This does not mean rejecting the scriptures, which the sermon itself comments on; it means that understanding is a direct seeing, not a conclusion of thought.

    Compare this question with other teachers

  • Withdraw from the world or transform it?

    One can practise at home: there is no need to be in a monastery

    Contemplation in actionStated explicitly

    The Platform Sūtra, preached according to the story before an assembly of monks, officials and laypeople, states that whoever wishes to practise can do so at home: it does not depend on being in a monastery. If one practises at home with an upright mind, one is like the people of the east who do good; if one is in the monastery without practising, one is like the people of the west with a crooked heart. The formless verse Huineng teaches the laity translates the path into ordinary life: gratitude to parents, respect between superiors and inferiors, patience, correction of one's own faults. The practice of no-thought is exercised in the midst of things, without stopping at them. Awakening does not require leaving the world but not being caught in it.

    Compare this question with other teachers

Affinities & tensions

Affinities and tensions

Calculated question by question from their positions. The reason for each agreement or clash, on click.

Anecdotes and stories

Anecdotes and stories

Hagiographic accountc. 660

The woodcutter who heard the Diamond Sūtra

Huineng supported his widowed mother by selling firewood in the market of Nanhai, near present-day Canton. A customer bought a bundle and asked him to carry it to the inn; on leaving, money in hand, he heard a guest reciting a text and his mind, says the sūtra, opened at once. He asked what it was: the Diamond Sūtra, he was told, which the fifth patriarch Hongren was teaching to over a thousand disciples on the mountain of Huangmei, assuring them that reciting it was enough to see one's own nature. Later versions add that a stranger gave him ten ounces of silver so that his mother would be provided for while he travelled, and that the line that awakened him was “one should give rise to a mind that rests on nothing”. The episode fixes two traits of the character: awakening does not come from study, and the one who awakens is a poor illiterate from the south.

Origin of the story: Autobiography in the Platform Sūtra, already in the Dunhuang copy (ninth century); there is no independent testimony.

Source: Wikisource en chino: 南宗頓教最上大乘摩訶般若波羅蜜經六祖惠能大師於韶州大梵寺施法壇經 (texto de la copia de Dunhuang, compilado por Fahai).

Hagiographic accountc. 661

The poem contest

Hongren gathered his disciples and asked each to compose a poem showing his understanding: to whoever had it he would give the robe and the teaching, and he would be the sixth patriarch. No one dared except Shenxiu, the head monk, who did not venture to present it in person and wrote it at night on the south corridor wall, where a painter was to depict scenes from the Laṅkāvatāra: the body is the tree of awakening, the mind a bright mirror on its stand; it must be wiped at all times so that no dust settles. Hongren praised it in public and had everyone recite it, but privately told Shenxiu that he had not yet entered the gate. Huineng, treading rice at the mill, heard a boy reciting it, asked to be led to the wall and, since he could not write, dictated his reply. The Dunhuang copy attributes two stanzas to him; later versions a single one, the “not a single thing”. The story is read today as a polemical construction: Shenxiu's verse defends not a gradual path but constant practice, and the opposition served the Southern school to discredit the Northern.

Origin of the story: Autobiography in the Platform Sūtra, already in the Dunhuang copy (ninth century); there is no independent testimony.

Source: McRae, John R. Seeing through Zen: Encounter, Transformation, and Genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. ISBN 0520237986.

Hagiographic accountc. 661

Three knocks on the mortar

In the Zongbao version Hongren rubs out Huineng's poem with his sandal, saying that this one too has not seen the nature, to protect him from the monks' envy. The next day he goes to the mill, where the young man works with a stone tied to his waist to weigh more on the pestle, and asks whether the rice is ready. “It has long been ready,” he answers; “it only needs sifting.” The master knocks three times on the mortar with his staff and leaves. Huineng understands: at the third watch of the night he goes to the master's room, where Hongren, screening them with his robe so that no one sees, expounds the Diamond Sūtra to him; on hearing that one should give rise to a mind that rests on nothing, he attains great awakening and receives the robe and bowl. It is a scene of secret initiation built on a coded language that Chan literature would later cultivate in kōans.

Origin of the story: Only in the late versions of the Platform Sūtra (Huixin 967 and above all Zongbao 1291) and in Song-period case collections (Wumenguan, 1228); absent from the Dunhuang copy.

Source: Wikisource en chino: 六祖大師法寶壇經 (versión de Zongbao, 1291), con una página por capítulo.

Hagiographic accountc. 661

Huiming's original face

Fleeing south with the robe, Huineng was overtaken at the Dayu pass by a band of pursuers; the first to arrive was the monk Huiming, a former general of the fourth rank, a rough man. Huineng laid the robe and bowl on a rock: if faith was transmitted with them, let him take them by force. Huiming could not lift them. Then he asked for the teaching, not the robe. Huineng told him to set aside every thought and, after a long silence, asked him: not thinking of good, not thinking of evil, at this very moment, what is your original face? Huiming awakened on hearing it. The Dunhuang copy knows the pursuer—there he is called Huishun and had also been a general—but not the question, which became one of the most famous kōans of the Wumenguan (case 23).

Origin of the story: Only in the late versions of the Platform Sūtra (Huixin 967 and above all Zongbao 1291) and in Song-period case collections (Wumenguan, 1228); absent from the Dunhuang copy.

Source: Wikisource en chino: 六祖大師法寶壇經 (versión de Zongbao, 1291), con una página por capítulo.

Hagiographic account676 (según la tradición)

The wind and the banner

After years hidden among hunters—cooking his vegetables beside the meat, secretly freeing the animals from the nets—Huineng decided the time to teach had come and went down to Canton, to the Faxing temple, where master Yinzong was commenting on the Nirvāṇa Sūtra. The wind was stirring the temple banner and two monks were arguing: one said the banner moved; the other, the wind. Huineng intervened: neither the wind nor the banner; what moves is your mind. Yinzong, impressed, invited him to the seat of honour, asked him about the teaching of Huangmei and, learning who he was, asked to see the robe, shaved his head and ordained him. The episode exists only in the late versions; Wang Wei's eighth-century stele already names Yinzong as the one who tonsured him, so the name is old even if the scene is not.

Origin of the story: Only in the late versions of the Platform Sūtra (Huixin 967 and above all Zongbao 1291) and in Song-period case collections (Wumenguan, 1228); absent from the Dunhuang copy.

Source: Wikisource en chino: 六祖大師法寶壇經 (versión de Zongbao, 1291), con una página por capítulo.

Hagiographic accountc. 700

The three blows to Shenhui

The Dunhuang copy of the Platform Sūtra itself includes a scene awkward for the man scholars consider its inspirer. A young monk from Xiangyang named Shenhui comes to Caoxi and asks the master whether, when he sits in meditation, he sees or does not see. Huineng gets up, strikes him three times and asks in turn: “When I hit you, does it hurt or not?” Shenhui answers that it both hurts and does not hurt. Huineng replies that he likewise sees and does not see, and rebukes him for worrying about another's seeing instead of looking at his own nature. Shenhui bows, repents and stays to serve him. The scene works as a certificate: the future champion of the Southern school appears as a direct disciple, corrected and accepted by the master. That it is in the oldest text is one of the clues that led Hu Shi to see the hand of Shenhui's circle behind the sūtra.

Origin of the story: Dunhuang copy of the Platform Sūtra (§48–49 in Yampolsky); interpretation by Hu Shi (1930) and Yampolsky (1967).

Source: Wikisource en chino: 南宗頓教最上大乘摩訶般若波羅蜜經六祖惠能大師於韶州大梵寺施法壇經 (texto de la copia de Dunhuang, compilado por Fahai).

Testimony1589

Matteo Ricci before the sixth patriarch's body

In 1589 the Jesuit Matteo Ricci, who was trying to settle in south China, was lodged at the Nanhua temple in Caoxi, Huineng's monastery. There he saw the lacquered body venerated as the sixth patriarch's, seated in meditation, and described it in his journals for European readers, comparing the monk to Christian ascetics. Ricci did not stay: he declined the invitation to live in the temple and settled in nearby Shaozhou. His account is the first Western testimony of the mummy, which survived into the twentieth century and was damaged during the Cultural Revolution. Jorgensen has studied how the body, relics and robe formed part, from the eighth century, of the construction of the patriarch's cult.

Origin of the story: Ricci's journals, published in Latin by Nicolas Trigault (1615) and translated by Gallagher (1953); study by Jorgensen (2005).

Source: Ricci, Matteo y Nicolas Trigault. China in the Sixteenth Century: The Journals of Matthew Ricci, 1583–1610. Trad. Louis J. Gallagher. Nueva York: Random House, 1953.

Teachings

Teachings

The notions that structure their thought, explained in context.

Sudden awakening (dunwu)dunwu
The doctrine by which the Southern school defined itself against the Northern holds that awakening is not reached by accumulating practices but all at once, because one's own nature is already pure and only veiled by delusion: it is enough to recognise it. In the Platform Sūtra the difference between sudden and gradual lies not in the truth, which is one, but in people, some slower and some quicker. Shenhui turned the opposition into a weapon: he accused Shenxiu's school of teaching a gradual path of cleaning the mirror, which McRae and others have shown to be a caricature. From the ninth century the superiority of sudden awakening became common doctrine across Chan, and it remains at the centre of the Japanese Rinzai school, whose great reformer was Hakuin.

Controversy between the Northern and Southern schools (eighth century).

Source: McRae, John R. Seeing through Zen: Encounter, Transformation, and Genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. ISBN 0520237986.

No-thought, no-form, no-abidingwunian
The sermon sums up its method in three negations: no-thought (wunian) as principle, no-form (wuxiang) as substance and no-abiding (wuzhu) as root. None means suppressing experience. No-thought is “not thinking in the midst of thinking”: thoughts arise, but the mind does not stick to them; whoever tries to think nothing at all, the text warns, falls into error. No-form is being among forms without being caught in them. No-abiding is not stopping at any moment of experience, so that past, present and future are not chained into bondage. The formula, rooted in the prajñāpāramitā and akin to the Diamond Sūtra, shifts practice from stillness to freedom in the midst of activity.

Platform Sūtra, section 17 of the Dunhuang copy.

Source: Yampolsky, Philip B. (ed. y trad.). The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch: The Text of the Tun-huang Manuscript. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 1967; reed. 2012 (ISBN 9780231159562).

Unity of meditation and wisdom (dinghui)dinghui
Against the classical sequence in which concentration (ding, samādhi) prepares wisdom (hui, prajñā), the Platform Sūtra holds that both are one body: meditation is the substance of wisdom and wisdom the function of meditation, like the lamp and its light. Whoever says that one first meditates and wisdom then arises, or the reverse, introduces a duality into the teaching. Hence the critique of seated meditation that consists in staying motionless or contemplating the mind or purity: “sitting” means the mind is not stirred by objects and “meditating” means inwardly seeing the immobility of one's own nature. It is the doctrinal basis of Chan's distrust of gradual methods.

A Chinese reinterpretation of the discipline-meditation-wisdom triad.

Source: Wikisource en chino: 南宗頓教最上大乘摩訶般若波羅蜜經六祖惠能大師於韶州大梵寺施法壇經 (texto de la copia de Dunhuang, compilado por Fahai).

Seeing one's nature (jianxing)jianxing
The term Japanese Zen would read as kenshō designates the direct recognition of buddha-nature in oneself. The Platform Sūtra repeats it as the formula of awakening—“seeing the nature and becoming a buddha”—and associates it with the absence of intermediaries: no texts, rites or stages. The expression became the watchword of the Southern school; precisely because of it Dōgen, in the thirteenth century, declared the sūtra apocryphal, since in his view it separated awakening from practice. Hakuin, by contrast, made kenshō the explicit goal of kōan work.

Doctrine of buddha-nature (foxing) in Chan.

Source: Dōgen. Shōbōgenzō, fascículo «Shizen biku» (四禪比丘), en la recensión de doce fascículos; trad. inglesa en Nishijima, Gudo y Chodo Cross, Master Dogen's Shobogenzo, vol. 4, Windbell, 1999.

Formless precepts (wuxiang jie)wuxiang-jie
The full title of the Dunhuang copy says that Huineng not only preached but “conferred the formless precepts”. The sermon includes a liturgy: refuge in the three bodies of the buddha of one's own nature, the four great vows, a formless repentance and the triple refuge understood as refuge in the awakening, rightness and purity of one's own mind. For McRae and Yampolsky this part reveals that the text served as a manual for ordaining lay people and as a certificate of lineage membership: whoever received the sūtra received the transmission.

Mass lay ordinations in eighth- and ninth-century Chan.

Source: Yampolsky, Philip B. (ed. y trad.). The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch: The Text of the Tun-huang Manuscript. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 1967; reed. 2012 (ISBN 9780231159562).

Transmission of the robe and patriarchal lineagechuanyi
The idea of a chain of patriarchs from the Buddha to Bodhidharma and, in China, from Bodhidharma to Huike, Sengcan, Daoxin, Hongren and Huineng, with a robe as physical proof of transmission, is the core of the story. Shenhui used it in 732 to delegitimise the Northern school; the Platform Sūtra reproduces it with the verses of the six patriarchs and at the same time declares that the robe is no longer to be transmitted. Scholars consider it an eighth-century construction modelled on Confucian genealogy; its success was total: all later Chan and Zen lineages, including Dōgen's and Hakuin's, pass through Huineng.

Chan historiography (eighth to eleventh centuries).

Source: McRae, John R. Seeing through Zen: Encounter, Transformation, and Genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. ISBN 0520237986.

Videos

Videos

Recordings, interviews and documentaries. Videos play from YouTube; they are not hosted here.

  • The Platform Sutra of Chan Buddhism - Jun Wang

    Lecture· EN· 2018

    Debashish Banerji

  • Sixth Patriarch's Dharma Jewel Platform Sutra (1) by Rev. Heng Sure from BRF2018

    Lecture· EN· 2019

    DharmaRealmLiveOfficial channel

  • Reflections from the Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch - Ven. Dr Juewei

    Lecture· EN· 2020

    Buddhist Library

  • The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch L1

    Lecture· EN

    Khenpo Sodargye's TeachingsOfficial channel

  • SBZC with Bill Powell "The Platform Sutra" class #1

    Lecture· EN· 2021

    Santa Barbara Zen CenterOfficial channel

  • Class on the Platform Sutra

    Lecture· EN

    kansaszencenterOfficial channel

  • The Mind Has No Stand: Zen, Huineng, Teaching & Text

    Analysis· EN· 2021

    Eric Gerlach

  • Huineng - The 6th Chinese Ancestor of Zen Buddhism

    Lecture· EN

    Great Mountain Zen CenterOfficial channel

  • 【六祖壇經的生活實踐】 主講：慧知法師

    Lecture· ZH

    VIBPS 溫哥華佛光山 Vancouver IBPSOfficial channel

  • 慧知法師紐約佛學講座-《六祖壇經》的生活智慧

    Lecture· ZH

    FGS IBPS New YorkOfficial channel

  • 佛教紀錄片：六祖惠能的最後一年 （智慧東方）

    Documentary· ZH· 2017

    佛弟子

  • ¿Quién fue Hui Neng?

    Third-party recording· ES

    Cosas del Zen

Gallery

Gallery

Images with verified licences. Each keeps its authorship and attribution.

Manuscripts

Manuscripts

Manuscript witnesses and ancient texts, with their custodian and conditions of access.

  • ZH · Chino (escritura regular, copia manuscrita) · c. 780

    南宗頓教最上大乘摩訶般若波羅蜜經六祖惠能大師於韶州大梵寺施法壇經

    Surviving witness
    Copia de hacia 830–860, la más antigua conocida, en formato de cuadernillo
    Custodian
    British Library (Londres) · Or.8210/S.5475
    Digitisation
    idp.bl.uk/…

  • ZH · Chino · c. 780

    六祖壇經 (copia de Dunhuang)

    Surviving witness
    Segunda copia completa de Dunhuang, de mejor calidad textual
    Custodian
    Museo de Dunhuang · Dunbo 077
Manuscripts →

Connections

Connections

Influences, discipleships and affinities. Documented relations are distinguished from similarities identified by analysis.

  • Influenced by

    Bodhidharma

    The sūtra presents him as the sixth link of the lineage beginning with Bodhidharma and records his transmission verse.

    Documented relation

  • Disciple of

    Hongren (601–674), quinto patriarca

    His teacher at Huangmei, according to all sources, including Wang Wei's stele.

    Documented relation

  • Contemporary of

    Shenxiu (c. 606–706)

    Hongren's chief disciple and figure of the Northern school; the poem contest pitting them against each other is legendary.

    Documented relation

  • Teacher of

    Shenhui (684–758)

    He proclaimed himself his disciple and was the architect of his fame; the Dunhuang copy includes him among his ten disciples.

    Documented relation

  • Influenced

    Dōgen

    Heir of a Caodong lineage going back to Huineng; in the Shōbōgenzō (“Shizen biku”) he rejected the Platform Sūtra as apocryphal.

    Documented relation

  • Influenced

    Hakuin Ekaku

    His Rinzai lineage goes back to Huineng through Linji; the kenshō Hakuin demands is the sūtra's “seeing the nature”.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Influenced

    Shunryu Suzuki

    A Sōtō master, of Dōgen's lineage which goes back to Huineng.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Influenced

    Thich Nhat Hanh

    His Vietnamese Lâm Tế (Linji) lineage goes back to Huineng.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Influenced by

    Nāgārjuna

    The sūtra's logic of emptiness—denying tree and mirror—extends the prajñāpāramitā and Madhyamaka; tradition counts Nāgārjuna among the Indian patriarchs.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Contemporary of

    Śāntideva

    Rough contemporaries at the two ends of Asia, both centred on the nature of mind and the wisdom of emptiness.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Ideas akin to

    Laozi

    The sūtra's valuing of flow, non-fixation and immediacy recalls Daoist themes; the influence is debated.

    Similarity identified by analysis

Linked from other profiles

Sources

Sources

Bibliography and catalogues consulted for this profile.

  1. Wikidata, «Huineng», QID Q345012 (VIAF 32007548; LCCN n50078883).
  2. Yampolsky, Philip B. (ed. y trad.). The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch: The Text of the Tun-huang Manuscript. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 1967; reed. 2012 (ISBN 9780231159562).
  3. McRae, John R. Seeing through Zen: Encounter, Transformation, and Genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. ISBN 0520237986.
  4. McRae, John R. (trad.). The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch, translated from the Chinese of Tsung-pao. Berkeley: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, 2000. ISBN 1886439133.
  5. McRae, John R. The Northern School and the Formation of Early Ch'an Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press (Kuroda Institute), 1986.
  6. Schlütter, Morten y Stephen F. Teiser (eds.). Readings of the Platform Sūtra. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 2012. ISBN 9780231158206.
  7. Jorgensen, John. Inventing Hui-neng, the Sixth Patriarch: Hagiography and Biography in Early Ch'an. Leiden: Brill (Sinica Leidensia 68), 2005. ISBN 9004145087.
  8. Thompson, John M. «Huineng (Hui-neng) (638–713)». Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  9. Hu Shi 胡適 (ed.). Shenhui heshang yiji 神會和尚遺集 (Obras conservadas del monje Shenhui). Shanghái: Yadong tushuguan, 1930.
  10. Wang Wei 王維. «Neng chanshi bei» 能禪師碑 (Estela del maestro de chan Neng), mediados del siglo VIII, recogida en el Quan Tang wen; inscripción encargada por Shenhui.
  11. Schlütter, Morten. «A Study in the Genealogy of the Platform Sūtra». Studies in Central and East Asian Religions 2 (1989): 53–114.
  12. Wong Mou-lam (trad.). Sutra Spoken by the Sixth Patriarch, Wei Lang, on the High Seat of the Gem of Law. Shanghái: Yu Ching Press, 1930.
  13. Wikisource en chino: 南宗頓教最上大乘摩訶般若波羅蜜經六祖惠能大師於韶州大梵寺施法壇經 (texto de la copia de Dunhuang, compilado por Fahai).
  14. Wikisource en chino: 六祖大師法寶壇經 (versión de Zongbao, 1291), con una página por capítulo.
  15. Huineng (atrib.), Fahai (comp.). 六祖壇經 (Liuzu tanjing), edición de la dinastía Ming colacionada por Deqing. Project Gutenberg, e-book n.º 23844, 2007.
  16. Ricci, Matteo y Nicolas Trigault. China in the Sixteenth Century: The Journals of Matthew Ricci, 1583–1610. Trad. Louis J. Gallagher. Nueva York: Random House, 1953.
  17. Dumoulin, Heinrich. Zen Buddhism: A History. Vol. 1: India and China. Nueva York: Macmillan, 1988.
  18. Red Pine (Bill Porter) (trad.). The Platform Sutra: The Zen Teaching of Hui-neng. Emeryville (CA): Shoemaker & Hoard, 2006. ISBN 9781593760861.
  19. Dōgen. Shōbōgenzō, fascículo «Shizen biku» (四禪比丘), en la recensión de doce fascículos; trad. inglesa en Nishijima, Gudo y Chodo Cross, Master Dogen's Shobogenzo, vol. 4, Windbell, 1999.
  20. Yanagida Seizan 柳田聖山. Shoki zenshū shisho no kenkyū 初期禅宗史書の研究. Kioto: Hōzōkan, 1967.
  21. Yanagida Seizan (ed.). Rokuso dangyō shohon shūsei 六祖壇經諸本集成. Kioto: Chūbun shuppansha, 1976.
  22. Chan, Wing-tsit (trad.). The Platform Scripture. Nueva York: St. John's University Press, 1963.
Rights holder
Texto chino original en dominio público. Traducciones modernas con derechos: Columbia University Press (Yampolsky), Numata Center/BDK (McRae), Counterpoint (Red Pine), Shambhala (Cleary; Price y Wong), Editorial Kairós (Laureano Ramírez), Edaf.

Pending confirmation

What this profile has not yet been able to settle. We would rather say so than fill it in.

  • Traducción inglesa de Wong Mou-lam (Shanghái, Yu Ching Press, 1930): es de dominio público en EE. UU. (publicada en 1930, libre desde el 1 de enero de 2026), en la UE y en España (Wong Mou-lam, 1886–1934), pero no se ha localizado un escaneo con OCR limpio de la edición de 1930; las de Luzac (1944, 1953) y Shambhala llevan la revisión de Christmas Humphreys (m. 1983), protegida. Buscar en Internet Archive o HathiTrust la edición de 1930.
  • Versión base de la traducción española de Laureano Ramírez (Kairós, 2010; hay ediciones anteriores) — comprobar si es la de Dunhuang o la de Zongbao.
  • Signatura y digitalización de la copia del Museo de Dunhuang (Dunbo 077) y de la de Lüshun; no verificadas en un catálogo accesible.
  • Fecha y circunstancias exactas del título póstumo (815/816) y de las estelas de Liu Zongyuan y Liu Yuxi: se han tomado de la bibliografía secundaria (Dumoulin), no de las fuentes.
  • Vídeos en español: solo se ha encontrado material divulgativo breve; no hay conferencias académicas en español con canal solvente.
  • Las ediciones francesas, alemanas e italianas del sūtra no se han cotejado en catálogo.

Researched on 2026-10-25