Skip to content
The ConsciousLibrary

Hinduism · Advaita Vedanta · Vedic tradition

Uddalaka Aruni

उद्दालक आरुणि

Historicity debated

Vedic sage of Kuru-Pañcāla, of the Gautama lineage, whom the Upaniṣads present as the teacher of his son Śvetaketu and of Yājñavalkya. In the sixth book of the Chāndogya he teaches through experiments — clay, the fig seed, salt dissolved in water — that everything comes from being, "one without a second", and sums it up in the refrain "tat tvam asi". He wrote nothing; his figure, of debated historicity, comes from the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa and the oldest Upaniṣads, from around the seventh to sixth centuries BCE.

works
9works
editions
24editions
quotes
7quotes
videos
12videos
images
4images
Manuscrito de la Chāndogya Upaniṣad (1849)

Manuscrito de la Chāndogya Upaniṣad (1849) · CC BY-SA 4.0

In their words

«In the beginning, my dear, this was being alone, one only, without a second.»

Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.2.1 (traducción propia)

Their central idea

Tat tvam asi ("you are that"): The refrain that closes nine of Uddālaka's lessons to Śvetaketu in the Chāndogya (6.8.7–6.16.3): that subtle essence (aṇiman) is what all this has as its self; that is the real; that is the ātman; tat tvam asi.

Biography

5 min read

A teacher in the lists of teachers

Uddālaka Āruṇi left no writings. He is a name that recurs throughout late Vedic prose — the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa, the Bṛhadāraṇyaka and Chāndogya Upaniṣads, the Kauṣītaki, the Jaiminīya Upaniṣad Brāhmaṇa — as a ritual authority, as a partner in debates and, above all, as a teacher. The texts also call him Gautama after his lineage and give him a father, Aruṇa Aupaveśi, and a son, Śvetaketu Āruṇeya; from these mentions Michael Witzel has reconstructed a four-generation family tree. He was a brahmin of Kuru-Pañcāla, the heartland of the Vedic world on the western Ganges plain, and the Bṛhadāraṇyaka's lists of teachers make him Yājñavalkya's teacher: "Yājñavalkya from Uddālaka; Uddālaka from Aruṇa".

The traveller in the north

The Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa preserves an episode that portrays him as an itinerant priest. Uddālaka was travelling through the northern country as an officiant and carried a gold coin, because in olden times, the text says, whoever travelled in this way offered a prize to challenge others to a disputation. The brahmins of the north, fearing that this Kuru-Pañcāla brahmin would take their territory, sent Svaidāyana Śaunaka. He put to him a series of questions on the hidden meaning of the new- and full-moon offerings; Uddālaka handed him the coin, acknowledged his learning and later returned with firewood in his hand — the gesture of one who asks to become a pupil — so that he might explain them. In another passage it is he who answers, one by one, Śauceya Prācīnayogya's questions about the agnihotra.

Father and teacher

The teaching that made him famous is that of the sixth book of the Chāndogya. His son Śvetaketu, sent to study at twelve, returns at twenty-four, the text says, "swell-headed, arrogant, thinking himself learned". The father asks whether he knows the teaching by which the unheard becomes heard, the unthought thought and the unknown known. Finding him ignorant, he offers it: just as by a single lump of clay everything made of clay is known — and the pots are nothing but "a matter of words, a modification, a name" — so by being (sat) everything that exists is known. "In the beginning, my dear, this was being alone, one only, without a second." From it arise heat, water and food, which combine in all things.

Nine lessons and a refrain

Uddālaka teaches by experiment. He makes his son fast for fifteen days, drinking only water, and shows that he can no longer recite the Vedas; when he eats again his memory returns like an ember fanned with straw. Nine lessons follow: honey that gathers the nectar of many trees without any drop knowing from which tree it came, rivers that lose themselves in the sea, the tree that lives as long as life pervades it, the fig seed that, split open, shows nothing and yet gives rise to the great tree, salt dissolved in water that cannot be seen and is tasted everywhere, the man who, blindfolded, finds his way back to Gandhāra because someone shows him the road. Each lesson ends with the same refrain: that subtle essence is what all this has as its self; that is the real; that is the ātman; tat tvam asi, Śvetaketu.

What "tat tvam asi" means

The Advaita tradition, from Śaṅkara onwards, has read the phrase as an identity — "you are that": the individual ātman is brahman — and counted it among the four "great sayings" of the Upaniṣads. In 1986 Joel Brereton proposed another reading, attentive to grammar and context: the neuter pronoun refers back to the subtle essence just described, and the sentence would mean something like "that's how you are". Patrick Olivelle accordingly translates "and that's how you are, Śvetaketu". Both readings agree on the essential point — the son is made of the same invisible reality as everything else — but differ on whether the text states a metaphysical identity or an explanation of the nature of the person.

A brahmin willing to learn

The texts stress one trait of his character: Uddālaka is not afraid to become a pupil again. At Janaka's court he questions Yājñavalkya about the "thread" that binds the worlds and the "inner controller", recalls what he learned from Patañcala Kāpya in the land of the Madras and, after the answer, falls silent. When King Pravāhaṇa Jaivali humiliates Śvetaketu with five questions about the fate after death, the father goes to court, asks to be instructed and receives the doctrine of the five fires, which the king declares has never before reached a brahmin. When other brahmins ask him about the universal ātman, he admits he cannot fully answer and takes them to King Aśvapati Kaikeya. Brian Black has studied these scenes, in which knowledge passes from kings to priests.

What is known and what is not

There are no dates: Uddālaka's historicity is debated like that of the whole generation of the early Upaniṣads, which Olivelle places around the seventh and sixth centuries BCE and Witzel in the late Vedic period, before the Buddha. Ben-Ami Scharfstein counts him among the first philosophers in history, and the Marxist historian Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya saw in him the first "natural scientist" because of his method of observation and experiment. The Kaṭha Upaniṣad mentions an Auddālaki Āruṇi, father of Naciketas, whom Śaṅkara identified with him; Max Müller warned that the form of the name raises doubts.

The Āruṇi of the epic

The Mahābhārata gave him a legendary youth. Āruṇi of Pañcāla, a pupil of the sage Āyoda Dhaumya, was sent to stop a breach in the dyke of a field; unable to do so, he lay down in it and held back the water with his body. When his teacher called him, he rose, breaking the dyke, and Dhaumya gave him the name Uddālaka, "he who rose from the dyke". The same epic makes his daughter Sujātā the mother of Aṣṭāvakra and credits Śvetaketu with instituting marital fidelity. A late Upaniṣad of renunciation bears his name, the Āruṇi Upaniṣad, and Madhva quoted an "Āruṇi-śruti" now lost. The Chāndogya's refrain, meanwhile, has become one of the most repeated phrases of Indian spirituality.

Sources: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1. · Olivelle, Patrick (trad.). Upaniṣads. Oxford World's Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 (traducción «And that's how you are, Śvetaketu» de Chāndogya 6.8.7 y ss.). · Müller, F. Max (trad.). The Upanishads, Part I (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879 (Khândogya y Kaushîtaki-brâhmaṇa-upanishad); y Part II (SBE 15), 1884, nota a Kaṭha 1.11. · Eggeling, Julius (trad.). The Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa, Part V (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 44). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900. XI.4.1 (Uddālaka Āruṇi y Svaidāyana) y XI.5.3 (Śauceya Prācīnayogya y Uddālaka Āruṇi sobre el agnihotra). · Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad. Science and Society in Ancient India. Calcuta: Research India Publications, 1977.

Timeline

A life, year by year

Each point is a documented event. Click to read it, with its source and degree of certainty.

  1. VIII century BCE – 600 BCE

    Ritual authority of the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa

    His opinions and debates appear in the later books of the Śatapatha (XI.4.1, XI.5.3) and in the Jaiminīya Upaniṣad Brāhmaṇa. The range is an estimate of the period of the texts.

    Probable

  2. VII century BCE

    Svaidāyana's challenge

    Travelling in the north as an officiant, he loses a disputation to Svaidāyana Śaunaka and returns with firewood in hand to be instructed (Śatapatha XI.4.1).

    Tradition

  3. VII century BCE

    The teaching to Śvetaketu

    Chāndogya 6: being, one without a second, the experiments and the refrain "tat tvam asi".

    Tradition

  4. VII century BCE

    Pupil of King Pravāhaṇa Jaivali

    After his son's humiliation at the Pañcāla assembly, he receives from the king the doctrine of the five fires (Chāndogya 5.3–10; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 6.2).

    Tradition

  5. VII century BCE

    He questions Yājñavalkya

    He asks about the "thread" and the "inner controller" and falls silent after the answer (Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7).

    Tradition

  6. II century BCE – 400

    The Āruṇi of the Mahābhārata

    The epic, fixed between the third century BCE and the fourth century CE, tells the episode of the dyke and how his teacher Dhaumya gave him the name Uddālaka.

    Probable

  7. 1862

    First English translation of the Chāndogya

    Rājendralāla Mitra publishes the Chāndogya with extracts from Śaṅkara's commentary in the Bibliotheca Indica.

    Documented

  8. 1879

    The Chāndogya in the Sacred Books of the East

    Max Müller opens the series with the Chāndogya and popularizes the rendering "Thou art that".

    Documented

  9. 1986

    Brereton rereads "tat tvam asi"

    Joel Brereton proposes reading the refrain in its grammatical context as "that's how you are", a reading Olivelle adopts.

    Documented

Works

Essential works

The works without which their legacy cannot be understood.

The teaching to Śvetaketu (Chāndogya Upaniṣad, book VI) — Uddalaka Aruni

Traditional attribution · VII century BCE

The teaching to Śvetaketu (Chāndogya Upaniṣad, book VI)

छान्दोग्योपनिषद् षष्ठोऽध्यायः (Chāndogya Upaniṣad VI)

Sixteen prose sections. Śvetaketu returns conceited after twelve years of study, and his father teaches him what he did not learn: how, by knowing one thing, everything is known. He sets out the origin of the world from being (sat), "one without a second", which produces heat, water and food; the threefold composition of all things; the experiment of fasting; and nine illustrations — honey, rivers, the tree, the fig seed, salt in water, the man from Gandhāra, the dying man, the thief put to the ordeal of the axe — ending with the refrain "tat tvam asi, Śvetaketu". It is one of the founding texts of Vedānta.

9 editions

Later compilation · VII century BCE

Chāndogya Upaniṣad (passages of Uddālaka Āruṇi)

छान्दोग्योपनिषद् (Chāndogya Upaniṣad)

Together with the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, the oldest of the Upaniṣads. Its first books interpret the chants (sāman) and the syllable Om; the following ones contain teachings on the ātman and brahman attributed to various masters. In book 5 Uddālaka receives from King Pravāhaṇa the doctrine of the five fires and the two paths of the dead, and accompanies other brahmins to Aśvapati Kaikeya to learn the universal ātman (vaiśvānara). Book 6 is his teaching to Śvetaketu.

6 editions

Quotations

Quotations located in a specific work. Each carries its provenance and its level of confidence.

In the beginning, my dear, this was being alone, one only, without a second.

सदेव सोम्येदमग्र आसीदेकमेवाद्वितीयम् ।

VerifiedChāndogya Upaniṣad 6.2.1 (traducción propia)

1 / 7

Last words

There are no verifiable records of their last words.

There is no account of his death or last words in the Vedic texts, the epic or the Purāṇas. The only words of his that survive are the teachings and dialogues attributed to him by the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa and the Upaniṣads.

Source: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Ask

What their work answers

Twelve great human questions and what their texts allow us to answer, with references. We never put words in their mouth.

  • What is the Absolute? Does God exist?

    In the beginning there was only being, one without a second

    An impersonal AbsoluteStated explicitly

    In the sixth book of the Chāndogya Upaniṣad, Uddālaka Āruṇi teaches his son Śvetaketu that in the beginning there was only being (sat), one without a second, and rejects those who held that being was born from non-being. From that principle come heat, water and food, and from their mixture all things. He does not describe a god who judges or loves: he describes a single substance, so subtle that it is not perceived, which is the ātman of all that exists. His examples —the clay of which all pots are made, the dissolved salt that is unseen yet present in every sip, the invisible seed from which the fig tree grows— aim to make the disciple recognise that principle in things and in himself.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Who am I? Is there a true self?

    The subtle essence of all is the ātman, «and that's how you are»

    The Self is the AbsoluteStated explicitly

    Nine of Uddālaka's lessons to Śvetaketu in the Chāndogya end with the same refrain: that subtle essence (aṇiman) is what all this has as its ātman; that is the real; that is the ātman; tat tvam asi (6.8.7–6.16.3). Śvetaketu's self is therefore not something apart: like the river that returns to the sea and no longer knows it was that river, or like honey made from different flowers, the individual comes from being and shares its essence. The Advaita tradition read the refrain as the great saying «you are that», a strict identity between the individual and brahman. The lesson is not presented as a theory, but as something the disciple must verify in things and recognise in himself.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Why do we suffer?

    He does not analyse pain; he speaks of one lost who needs guidance

    Did not address it

    The teachings the Chāndogya puts in Uddālaka Āruṇi's mouth contain no diagnosis of suffering. Their subject is the origin and essence of things, not the cause of pain. The closest is a parable (6.14): a man is blindfolded, led far from his land of Gandhāra and abandoned in a deserted place; he cries out that he has been brought there blindfolded, until someone removes the blindfold and points out the way, and he, asking from village to village, returns home. So, says Uddālaka, one who has a teacher knows that he will remain here only as long as he is not set free. The image suggests that the human condition is a disorientation that knowledge corrects, but the text does not formulate it as a theory of suffering.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • What happens after death?

    The body deprived of life dies; life does not die

    What I am is never born and never diesInferred from their doctrine

    Uddālaka explains death to Śvetaketu with the image of a great tree: if its root, trunk or crown is struck, it bleeds but lives, because life pervades it; if life leaves a branch, the branch withers. So, he concludes, it is the body deprived of life that dies; life does not die (Chāndogya 6.11.3). In another passage he describes the process: in the dying person, speech is gathered into the mind, the mind into breath, breath into heat and heat into the highest deity, the being from which all proceeds (6.8.6; 6.15). Death is thus a return to the subtle essence that never ceased to be. Uddālaka also appears, in book V, receiving from a king the doctrine of the five fires and of the paths beyond.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • How is liberation or salvation attained?

    To know that by which the unheard is heard and the unthought is thought

    Through direct knowledgeInferred from their doctrine

    Uddālaka's teaching in the Chāndogya begins with a reproach: Śvetaketu returns proud after twelve years of Vedic study, and his father asks whether he knows the teaching by which the unheard becomes heard, the unthought thought and the unknown known (6.1.2–3). The goal is that knowledge of the being from which everything proceeds, and what follows are the lessons through which it is reached: clay, salt, the fig seed. The parable of the man from Gandhāra shows where it leads: one who has a teacher knows that he will remain here only as long as he is not set free, and then he will arrive (6.14.2). In the last lesson, the one who speaks the truth is not burned when he grasps the red-hot axe (6.16). Known truth protects and frees.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Is a teacher necessary?

    One who has a teacher knows the way home

    IndispensableStated explicitly

    Uddālaka is, in the Chāndogya, the figure of the father who teaches: his entire sixth book is an instruction to his son Śvetaketu, made of questions, examples and small tests. And it is in that book that the need for a teacher is most clearly formulated. A blindfolded man is abandoned far from his land of Gandhāra; only when someone removes the blindfold and points out the direction can he return, asking from village to village. So, Uddālaka concludes, one who has a teacher (ācāryavān) knows: I remain here only as long as I am not set free, and then I shall arrive (6.14.2). The teacher does not replace the path, which the disciple walks himself, but without him one does not know which way to go.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Is the world real?

    Being became many: heat, water and food, and entered into them

    Manifestation of the divineStated explicitly

    For Uddālaka, the world comes from being (sat), which, wishing to be many, emitted heat; heat, water; and water, food (Chāndogya 6.2.3–4). It then entered those three «deities» with the living ātman and made them threefold, so that each thing contains all three: the red of fire is that of heat, the white that of water, the black that of food (6.3–4). His most famous example is clay: by one lump everything made of clay is known, because the modification is «a matter of words», a name, and the real is the substance (6.1.4). The world is not a dream, but being itself under names and forms; what dissolves on understanding it is the belief that things are something apart from their source.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • What is love?

    His lessons concern being, not love; they ask for trust

    Did not address it

    The teachings the Chāndogya and the Bṛhadāraṇyaka put in Uddālaka Āruṇi's mouth do not address love. Their subject is the origin of things, the subtle essence that sustains them and the relation between that essence and the disciple. The closest thing to an affective dimension lies in the tone of the teaching: he is a father instructing his son, calls him «dear one» (somya) again and again and, when Śvetaketu cannot see the invisible essence of the fig seed, asks him for trust (śraddhā). But the trust he asks for is that of a disciple who accepts what he does not yet understand, not a love directed to God or to one's neighbour, and the text does not develop it as a teaching.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Are we free, or is everything determined?

    He does not treat freedom; his last lesson is about truth

    Did not address it

    The teachings ascribed to Uddālaka Āruṇi do not address the question of freedom or fate. Their interest lies in the origin of things and in the subtle essence that sustains them, not in human action or its consequences. The doctrine of rebirth according to deeds, which the Chāndogya sets out in book V, Uddālaka receives from a king, Pravāhaṇa Jaivali, who warns him that this knowledge had not previously reached the brahmins. The closest thing to an ethic in his teaching is the last lesson to Śvetaketu (6.16): a man accused of theft is made to grasp a red-hot axe; if he has lied he is burned, and if he speaks the truth, protected by it, he is not. Truth is what frees, not a choice between alternatives.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Why meditate or pray?

    He teaches no meditation: he teaches looking and verifying

    Did not address it

    Uddālaka's lessons in the Chāndogya contain no practice of meditation or prayer. His method is different: questions, observation and small tests. He has Śvetaketu fast for fifteen days so that he finds that, without food, he cannot recall the Vedas, and that on eating he remembers them again (6.7); he asks him to dissolve salt in water and look for it by sight and by taste (6.13); he has him split a fig fruit and then a seed until he sees nothing inside (6.12). What is sought is not an induced inner state, but that the disciple should see for himself the subtle essence in things. When observation no longer reaches, Uddālaka proposes not a technique, but trust: «have faith, my dear».

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Can reason know the ultimate?

    Observe, compare, verify; and where sight fails, trust

    Faith and reason help each otherInferred from their doctrine

    Uddālaka's method in the Chāndogya is almost experimental. To teach Śvetaketu, who returns proud after twelve years of study, he does not cite texts: he has him fast for fifteen days to verify the relation between food and mind (6.7), dissolve salt in water and taste it (6.13), split a fig seed until he sees nothing (6.12). He reasons by analogies drawn from clay, copper and iron, and argues against those who said that being was born from non-being: how could that happen? (6.2.2). But observation has a limit: when the essence of the seed cannot be seen, Uddālaka asks for trust (śraddhā). Reason prepares and trust completes, in a knowledge the disciple must end up recognising in himself.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Withdraw from the world or transform it?

    A householder who teaches his son; he does not raise renunciation

    Did not address it

    Uddālaka Āruṇi's teachings do not address the choice between withdrawing from the world and transforming it. His figure, as presented by the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa and the Upaniṣads, is that of a brahmin householder, an expert in ritual, who debates in assemblies, travels to learn from others —including kings such as Pravāhaṇa Jaivali and Aśvapati Kaikeya— and passes his knowledge on to his son and his disciples. He sends Śvetaketu to study with a teacher, receives him on his return and instructs him at home. The knowledge of being that he teaches does not require leaving that life, but the text does not raise it as a question either. The renunciation associated with his name belongs to the Āruṇi Upaniṣad, a much later text.

    Compare this question with other teachers

Anecdotes and stories

Anecdotes and stories

Documentedépoca védica tardía (Chāndogya, ss. VII–VI a. C.)

Salt in water

To teach Śvetaketu that the real can be present without being seen, Uddālaka asks him to put a lump of salt into a pot of water and come back the next morning. In the morning he asks him to bring the salt. The son searches and cannot find it: it has dissolved. "Sip from the surface," the father says. "How does it taste?" — "Salty." "Sip from the middle." — "Salty." "Sip from the bottom." — "Salty." "Throw it away and come and sit with me." The salt, the father explains, is always there; in the same way, being is right here, though you do not perceive it. The lesson ends with the refrain repeated nine times in the chapter: "that subtle essence is what all this has as its self; that is the real; that is the ātman; tat tvam asi, Śvetaketu." It is perhaps the most quoted image in all Upaniṣadic literature.

Origin of the story: Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.13. "Documented" indicates that the story is in the text, not that the scene is historical.

Source: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Documentedépoca védica tardía

The fifteen-day fast

Uddālaka teaches his son that a person consists of sixteen parts and that the mind is made of food. To show it, he asks him not to eat for fifteen days and to drink only water, since breath, being made of water, will not be cut off. At the end of that time Śvetaketu returns, and his father asks him to recite the verses of the Ṛgveda, the formulas of the Yajurveda and the chants of the Sāmaveda. "They do not come to me," he answers. The father compares what is left of him to an ember the size of a firefly that survives a great fire and is not enough to burn anything. He tells him to eat, and when he returns Śvetaketu answers everything he is asked: the ember, fed with straw, has blazed up again. Chattopadhyaya saw the episode as one of the first recorded experiments in the history of thought.

Origin of the story: Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.7. The "scientific" reading is Chattopadhyaya's (1977).

Source: Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad. Science and Society in Ancient India. Calcuta: Research India Publications, 1977.

Documentedépoca védica tardía

The gold coin and the firewood

The Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa tells that Uddālaka Āruṇi was travelling through the northern country as a chosen priest and carried a gold coin, because in olden times whoever travelled thus offered a prize to encourage the timid to dispute with him. The brahmins of the north feared that this Kuru-Pañcāla brahmin, son of a brahmin, would take their territory, and chose Svaidāyana Śaunaka as their champion. Svaidāyana greeted him — "Hey, son of Gautama!" — and put to him questions about what the new- and full-moon sacrifices teach: why creatures are born toothless, why they turn grey, why semen is fertile only in middle age. Uddālaka handed him the coin, acknowledging his learning. To the others Svaidāyana said that whoever challenged that man would have his head split. Afterwards Uddālaka came back to him with firewood in hand: "I want to become your pupil." Svaidāyana explained the answers without requiring him to become one.

Origin of the story: Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa XI.4.1.1–10 (Eggeling's translation, SBE 44, pp. 50–54), with a parallel version in Gopatha Brāhmaṇa 1.3.6. The exact meaning of some phrases (the coin, the "head that splits") is disputed, as Eggeling notes.

Source: Eggeling, Julius (trad.). The Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa, Part V (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 44). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900. XI.4.1 (Uddālaka Āruṇi y Svaidāyana) y XI.5.3 (Śauceya Prācīnayogya y Uddālaka Āruṇi sobre el agnihotra).

Documentedépoca védica tardía

The king's five questions

Śvetaketu goes to the assembly of the Pañcālas, and King Pravāhaṇa Jaivali asks whether his father has instructed him. He puts five questions to him: where beings go on leaving this world, how they return, where the path of the gods and that of the ancestors part, why the other world does not fill up, and why at the fifth offering water acquires a human voice. Śvetaketu knows none of them. He returns home furious and reproaches his father for having told him he knew everything. Uddālaka admits that he does not know the answers either and, instead of defending his pride, goes to the court. The king offers him wealth; he asks only for those words. Pravāhaṇa makes him stay a long time and tells him: "This knowledge has never before reached the brahmins; that is why the rule of all the worlds has belonged to the kṣatriyas." And he teaches him the doctrine of the five fires.

Origin of the story: Chāndogya Upaniṣad 5.3 (with another version in Bṛhadāraṇyaka 6.2). Black (2007) analyses these scenes of knowledge passing from kings to brahmins.

Source: Black, Brian. The Character of the Self in Ancient India: Priests, Kings, and Women in the Early Upaniṣads. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007.

Hagiographic accountrelato épico (Mahābhārata, ss. III a. C.–IV d. C.)

The pupil who lay down in the dyke

In the first book of the Mahābhārata, the sage Āyoda Dhaumya had three pupils, and he asked one of them, Āruṇi of Pañcāla, to stop a breach in the dyke of a field. Āruṇi tried without success and, to carry out the order, lay down in the breach and held back the water with his own body. Seeing that he did not return, the teacher went out with his other pupils to look for him and called him by name. Āruṇi rose from the breach and presented himself. Dhaumya, moved by his obedience, gave him a new name — Uddālaka, "he who rose breaking the dyke" — and blessed him: all the Vedas and treatises of law would be revealed to him. The story is an example of devotion to the teacher (gurubhakti) and a popular etymology of the name.

Origin of the story: Mahābhārata 1.3 (Pauṣya-parvan; section 3 of Ganguli's translation). There is no Vedic parallel; the relation between this Āruṇi and the Uddālaka of the Upaniṣads is a traditional identification.

Source: Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trad.). The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa, vol. 1: Adi Parva. Calcuta, 1883–1896; Project Gutenberg n.º 15474 (sección 3, Āruṇi y Dhaumya; sección 122 de la vulgata, Śvetaketu). Para Aṣṭāvakra, Vana Parva 132–134 de la edición crítica.

Oral traditionrelato épico

Śvetaketu and the law of marriage

The Mahābhārata puts in King Pāṇḍu's mouth a story about Uddālaka's family. In olden times, he says, women were not bound to a single man. One day, in the presence of Uddālaka and his son Śvetaketu, a brahmin took the latter's mother by the hand and led her away. Śvetaketu was outraged, but his father explained that this was the ancient custom. Śvetaketu, however, then established the rule that a woman who leaves her husband, and a husband who leaves a faithful wife, commit a sin. The story, which serves in the epic to justify other forms of descent, is often cited in studies on the history of marriage in India.

Origin of the story: Mahābhārata 1.113 of the critical edition (section 122 of Ganguli's translation). It is an epic legend with no basis in the Vedic texts.

Source: Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trad.). The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa, vol. 1: Adi Parva. Calcuta, 1883–1896; Project Gutenberg n.º 15474 (sección 3, Āruṇi y Dhaumya; sección 122 de la vulgata, Śvetaketu). Para Aṣṭāvakra, Vana Parva 132–134 de la edición crítica.

Teachings

Teachings

The notions that structure their thought, explained in context.

Tat tvam asi ("you are that")tat-tvam-asi
The refrain that closes nine of Uddālaka's lessons to Śvetaketu in the Chāndogya (6.8.7–6.16.3): that subtle essence (aṇiman) is what all this has as its self; that is the real; that is the ātman; tat tvam asi. Śaṅkara and the Advaita tradition read it as an identity between the individual ātman ("you") and brahman ("that"), and count it among the four "great sayings" (mahāvākya) of the Upaniṣads. Rāmānuja understood it as a relation of inherence: the Lord is the inner self of the individual. Joel Brereton (1986) showed that, grammatically, the neuter pronoun tat may refer back to the subtle essence or have adverbial force, and proposed translating "that's how you are"; Patrick Olivelle translates "and that's how you are, Śvetaketu". In every reading the sentence asserts that the person is made of the same invisible reality as the rest of the universe.

Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6; Brereton 1986; Olivelle 1996.

Source: Brereton, Joel P. «Tat Tvam Asi in Context». Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 136 (1986): 98–109.

Sat (being, one without a second)sat
Uddālaka asserts that in the beginning there was only being, "one without a second", and explicitly rejects the view of those who said that in the beginning there was non-being and that being was born from non-being: "how could being be born from non-being?". Being, wishing to become many, emitted heat; heat, water; water, food. This cosmology, which derives everything from a single existing principle rather than from chaos or a primordial sacrifice, is the core of Vedāntic ontology and was invoked by all its schools.

Chāndogya 6.2.

Source: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Trivṛtkaraṇa (the triplication of the elements)trivrtkarana
According to Uddālaka, being entered the three "deities" — heat, water and food — with the living ātman and made them threefold, so that each thing contains all three. The red of fire is the colour of heat, white that of water, black that of food; seeing this, he says, the "fire-ness" of fire vanishes, for it is only a name. The same analysis is applied to the human body, in which food becomes flesh and mind, water becomes blood and breath, and heat becomes bone and speech. The doctrine, which Vedānta later developed as "quintuplication" (pañcīkaraṇa), has been noted by Chattopadhyaya as an early attempt at a natural explanation of matter.

Chāndogya 6.3–6.6.

Source: Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad. Science and Society in Ancient India. Calcuta: Research India Publications, 1977.

Aṇiman (the subtle essence)animan
What Uddālaka seeks in his examples is a reality so fine that it cannot be perceived and yet sustains everything: the invisible interior of the fig seed from which the great tree grows, the salt that cannot be seen in the water and is in every sip, the life that pervades the tree and without which it withers. This "fineness" (aṇiman) he calls the self of all, the real and the ātman. The concept unites physical observation and metaphysical speculation, and it is the grammatical subject on which the interpretation of "tat tvam asi" depends.

Chāndogya 6.8–6.16.

Source: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Vācārambhaṇa (modification is only a name)vacarambhana
In the first lesson Uddālaka says that by one lump of clay everything made of clay is known, by one piece of copper everything of copper, by one nail-cutter everything of iron, because the modification (vikāra) is "a matter of words" (vācārambhaṇa), a name, and the real is the substance. The formula became the proof text of the Vedāntic theory of causation: Advaita used it to argue that the world is an appearance (vivarta) on brahman, other schools to hold that the effect pre-exists in the cause (satkāryavāda).

Chāndogya 6.1.4–6; Brahmasūtra 2.1.14 and its commentaries.

Source: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Videos

Videos

Recordings, interviews and documentaries. Videos play from YouTube; they are not hosted here.

  • Tat Tvam Asi (That Thou Art) | Swami Sarvapriyananda

    Lecture· EN· 2021· 101 min

    Vedanta Society of New YorkOfficial channel

  • Talk on Tat Tvam Asi - The Ultimate Equation by Swami Sarvapriyananda

    Lecture· EN· 2026· 115 min

    Ramakrishna Vedanta Centre U.K.Official channel

  • The Story of Svetaketu - Thou Art That - Chandogya Upanishad | Pravrajika Divyanandaprana

    Lecture· EN· 2018· 20 min

    VivekaVani

  • Chandogya Upanishad Chapter-6 01

    Lecture· EN· 2022· 74 min

    Chinmaya Mission San JoseOfficial channel

  • Chandogya Upanishad Ch 6 – An Exposition of Tat Tvam Asi | Swami Ramakrishnananda | Dis 01

    Lecture· EN· 2026· 68 min

    Shravana Mangalam

  • Chandogya Upanishad Lecture - 1 (Chapter 6 - 1 - 1 to 6 - 1 - 4)

    Lecture· EN· 2026· 76 min

    Vedanta Students

  • श्वेतकेतु और उद्दालक, उपनिषद की कहानी, छान्द्योग्यापनिषद

    Lecture· HI· 2020· 35 min

    G.V.B. The University of Veda

  • CHANDOGYA. VER LO INVISIBLE

    Analysis· ES· 2022· 14 min

    Vedanta en Español

  • El pensamiento en la India: Hinduismo

    Documentary· ES· 2017· 25 min

    UNED DocumentosOfficial channel

  • The Upanishads: The Sacred Text that Changed India and the West | Jeffery Long, Ph.D.

    Lecture· EN· 2022· 56 min

    Theosophical SocietyOfficial channel

  • Introduction to the Rig Veda and Upanishads | Kendall Sharp | First Friday Lecture

    Lecture· EN· 2024· 78 min

    The University of Chicago Graham SchoolOfficial channel

  • The Central Doctrines of the Upanishads

    Lecture· EN· 2016· 37 min

    Vidya-mitraOfficial channel

Gallery

Gallery

Images with verified licences. Each keeps its authorship and attribution.

Manuscripts

Manuscripts

Manuscript witnesses and ancient texts, with their custodian and conditions of access.

Manuscripts →

Connections

Connections

Influences, discipleships and affinities. Documented relations are distinguished from similarities identified by analysis.

  • Teacher of

    Yajnavalkya

    The Bṛhadāraṇyaka's lists of teachers make Yājñavalkya Uddālaka's pupil ("Yājñavalkya from Uddālaka; Uddālaka from Aruṇa").

    Documented relation

  • Disagreed with

    Yajnavalkya

    He questions him at Janaka's court about the thread and the inner controller and falls silent after his answer (Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7).

    Documented relation

  • Family of

    Śvetaketu Āruṇeya

    His son and pupil, recipient of the teaching of Chāndogya 6.

    Documented relation

  • Family of

    Ashtavakra

    According to the Mahābhārata (3.132–134), Aṣṭāvakra was the son of Sujātā, Uddālaka's daughter, and of his pupil Kahoḍa; that is, his grandson. A legendary, not Vedic, relationship.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Disciple of

    Pravāhaṇa Jaivali

    The king of the Pañcālas teaches him the doctrine of the five fires (Chāndogya 5.3–10; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 6.2).

    Documented relation

  • Influenced

    Adi Shankara

    Śaṅkara commented on the Chāndogya and made "tat tvam asi" one of the great sayings of Advaita; he analyses it at length in the Upadeśasāhasrī.

    Documented relation

  • Ideas akin to

    Ramana Maharshi

    Inquiry into the self as the substratum of all experience extends the Advaita reading of "tat tvam asi".

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Ideas akin to

    Heraclitus

    Comparative philosophy (Scharfstein) has linked Uddālaka's search for a single principle behind change with that of the first Greek philosophers.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Ideas akin to

    Empedocles

    The theory of three elements combining in all things has been compared with Empedocles' roots.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Ideas akin to

    Parmenides

    The rejection of being arising from non-being (Chāndogya 6.2.2) is a frequent parallel in comparative philosophy.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Influenced

    Gaudapada

    Gauḍapāda's Kārikā develops, in terms of non-origination, the thesis that the effect is not different from its cause, illustrated by the clay of Chāndogya 6.1.

    Similarity identified by analysis

Sources

Sources

Bibliography and catalogues consulted for this profile.

  1. Wikidata, «Aruni» (Uddālaka Āruṇi), QID Q2724299.
  2. Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.
  3. Olivelle, Patrick (trad.). Upaniṣads. Oxford World's Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 (traducción «And that's how you are, Śvetaketu» de Chāndogya 6.8.7 y ss.).
  4. Müller, F. Max (trad.). The Upanishads, Part I (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879 (Khândogya y Kaushîtaki-brâhmaṇa-upanishad); y Part II (SBE 15), 1884, nota a Kaṭha 1.11.
  5. Brereton, Joel P. «Tat Tvam Asi in Context». Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 136 (1986): 98–109.
  6. Eggeling, Julius (trad.). The Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa, Part V (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 44). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900. XI.4.1 (Uddālaka Āruṇi y Svaidāyana) y XI.5.3 (Śauceya Prācīnayogya y Uddālaka Āruṇi sobre el agnihotra).
  7. Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad. Science and Society in Ancient India. Calcuta: Research India Publications, 1977.
  8. Witzel, Michael. «Yājñavalkya as Ritualist and Philosopher, and His Personal Language». En S. Adhami (ed.), Paitimāna: Essays in Iranian, Indo-European, and Indian Studies in Honor of Hanns-Peter Schmidt. Costa Mesa: Mazda, 2003, pp. 103–143 (n. 13: árbol genealógico Upaveśi – Aruṇa Aupaveśi – Uddālaka Āruṇi Gautama – Śvetaketu Āruṇeya).
  9. Black, Brian. The Character of the Self in Ancient India: Priests, Kings, and Women in the Early Upaniṣads. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007.
  10. Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trad.). The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa, vol. 1: Adi Parva. Calcuta, 1883–1896; Project Gutenberg n.º 15474 (sección 3, Āruṇi y Dhaumya; sección 122 de la vulgata, Śvetaketu). Para Aṣṭāvakra, Vana Parva 132–134 de la edición crítica.
  11. Olivelle, Patrick (trad.). The Saṃnyāsa Upaniṣads: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1992 (Āruṇi Upaniṣad).
  12. Scharfstein, Ben-Ami. A Comparative History of World Philosophy: From the Upanishads to Kant. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.
  13. Wikisource en sánscrito, «छान्दोग्योपनिषद्» (texto por adhyāya; adhyāya 5 y 6) y «बृहदारण्यकोपनिषद्» (6.5).
  14. Wikipedia (en inglés), «Uddalaka Aruni», consultada el 26 de octubre de 2026 (Āruṇi Upaniṣad, Āruṇi-śruti citada por Madhva, episodio de Dhaumya).
  15. Hume, Robert Ernest (trad.). The Thirteen Principal Upanishads. Londres: Oxford University Press, 1921.
  16. Ilárraz, Félix G., y Óscar Pujol (trads.). La sabiduría del bosque: antología de las principales Upaniṣad. Madrid: Trotta, 2003.
  17. Wikimedia Commons, ficheros y metadatos de licencia consultados mediante la API (imageinfo/extmetadata).
  18. Mitra, Rājendralāla (trad.). The Chhándogya Upanishad of the Sáma Veda, with Extracts from the Commentary of Śankara Áchárya. Calcuta: Baptist Mission Press (Bibliotheca Indica), 1862.
  19. Gambhirananda, Swami (trad.). Chāndogya Upaniṣad, with the Commentary of Śaṅkarācārya. Calcuta: Advaita Ashrama, 1983 (reimpr. 2006).
  20. Deussen, Paul (trad.). Sechzig Upanishad's des Veda. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1897.
Rights holder
Los textos sánscritos son de dominio público. Las traducciones modernas tienen derechos propios: Oxford University Press (Olivelle; Hume hasta 2029 en España), Trotta (Ilárraz y Pujol), Penguin (Roebuck), Advaita Ashrama (Gambhirananda), Hastinapura (versión española de Nikhilananda). Las de Mitra (1862), Müller (1879), Eggeling (1900) y Deussen (1897) son de dominio público.

Pending confirmation

What this profile has not yet been able to settle. We would rather say so than fill it in.

  • Mahābhārata: comprobar en la edición crítica las referencias 1.3 (Āruṇi y Dhaumya), 1.113 (Śvetaketu) y 3.132–134 (Aṣṭāvakra) frente a la numeración de Ganguli.
  • Kaṭha Upaniṣad 1.11: localizar la nota exacta de Max Müller (SBE 15) sobre «Auddālaki Āruṇi» y la identificación de Śaṅkara.
  • Chattopadhyaya, Science and Society in Ancient India: confirmar paginación del capítulo sobre Uddālaka y la editorial de la primera edición (Calcuta, 1977; reimpresión de B. R. Grüner, Ámsterdam).
  • Āruṇi-śruti citada por Madhva: localizar la referencia en las obras de Madhva o en un estudio especializado.
  • Ediciones: buscar ISBN de traducciones de la Chāndogya al francés, alemán, ruso e hindi; identificar al traductor español de la edición de Hastinapura (ISBN 9789509102699).
  • Relaciones: los slugs svetaketu y pravahana-jaivali no existen en el Atlas.
  • Vídeos: no se ha encontrado un documental de televisión pública ni una clase universitaria monográfica sobre Uddālaka; los vídeos registrados son conferencias de instituciones vedánticas y clases generales sobre las Upaniṣad.

Researched on 2026-10-26