Skip to content
The ConsciousLibrary

Islam · Sufism

Attar

فریدالدین ابوحامد محمد عطار نیشابوری · عطار

c. 1145 – 1221Historically documented person

Persian poet and hagiographer (Nishapur, c. 1145–c. 1221), a druggist by trade and a major figure of Sufi poetry. His Mantiq al-tayr tells of the birds' journey through seven valleys until they discover that the Simorgh is themselves; with the Ilahi-nama, Musibat-nama and Asrar-nama it forms a cycle of mystical masnavis, and his Tadhkirat al-awliya is the great Persian collection of saints' lives. Many works circulating under his name belong to another Attar. Rumi was his heir.

works
29works
editions
32editions
quotes
6quotes
videos
13videos
images
8images
La asamblea de las aves

La asamblea de las aves · CC0

In their words

«Praise to the pure Creator of the soul, who gave the dust a soul and gave it faith.»

Mantiq al-tayr, dístico inicial («Fi al-tawhid»), texto persa según Ganjoor; traducciones propias.

Their central idea

The Simorgh and the thirty birds: The Simorgh is a fabulous bird of Iranian tradition, wise and benevolent, which in the *Shahnameh* raises the hero Zal.

Biography

5 min read

The druggist of Nishapur

Abu Hamid Muhammad, son of Abu Bakr Ibrahim, signed his work with two names: Farid al-Din, 'pearl of religion', and Attar, the trade of one who sells perfumes, drugs and remedies. He lived in Nishapur, the great city of Khorasan, and very little of his life is known for certain. Only two contemporaries mention him: the anthologist Muhammad Awfi, who places him among the poets of the Seljuq period, and the philosopher Nasir al-Din Tusi, who as a student visited him when Attar was already an old man and told his pupil Ibn al-Fuwati years later that he had been impressed by his eloquence. The next notice, Hamdallah Mustawfi's Tarikh-e guzida, dates from 1330.

His own work says little, but it says something precise: that he practised pharmacy and personally attended a very large number of customers, and that he composed the Musibat-nama and the Ilahi-nama while working in the shop. Not depending on poetry for a living, he could despise the craft of the court panegyrist, which he never practised. Bernd Reinert stresses that his existence as pharmacist and Sufi does not seem to have been interrupted by journeys, and that in old age he lived a very retired life; the great travels to Mecca, Damascus or India ascribed to him by later biographies belong to legend.

Uncertain dates

Badiozzaman Foruzanfar calculated that he was born around 540 AH (1145–1146); the only date Attar himself mentions, 573 (1177) as the year he finished the Mantiq al-tayr, appears in a line that is not in all the manuscripts. As for his death, the most widespread opinion, followed by Foruzanfar and Reinert, is that he died in the massacre with which the Mongols destroyed Nishapur in Safar 618, April 1221; Hermann Landolt notes that 1230 remains possible. The 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica, faithful to the late sources, still gave him a hundred and ten years of life, from 1119 to 1229: an example of how the figure grew once his work became famous.

The legends

In his lifetime Attar was hardly known outside Nishapur. His greatness as a mystic and storyteller was discovered in the fifteenth century, and it was then that Jami and Dawlatshah of Samarkand embroidered his biography with fantastic tales. According to Dawlatshah, a dervish gazing into his shop asked him how he expected to die leaving so many goods behind; Attar abandoned the shop and became a Sufi. According to the same author, a Mongol soldier who had captured him refused a thousand dirhams for him and, when another man offered a sack of straw, Attar told him to sell, for he was worth no more; the soldier, enraged, killed him. Foruzanfar showed that the masters ascribed to him (Najm al-Din Kubra, Qutb al-Din Haydar and others) are inventions; only a link with Majd al-Din Baghdadi, whom he says he met, is possible, and perhaps an inward uwaysi affiliation with Abu Sa'id Abu'l-Khayr.

A body of work that grew with his fame

Legend credited him with as many works as there are suras in the Qur'an, and sorting out which are his has occupied specialists for a century. Hellmut Ritter noticed differences of style and confession (some works are Sunni, others Shi'ite) and first thought of an evolution of the poet; in 1941 Sa'id Nafisi proved that the Shi'ite ones, such as the Mazhar al-aja'ib and the Lisan al-ghayb, belong to another Attar, a native of Tun who lived in Mashhad some two hundred and fifty years later. A second group, headed by the Jawhar al-dhat and centred on the figure of al-Hallaj, is not his either on grounds of style, although its author remains unidentified. Attar himself lists his works in his prefaces: the Divan, the Asrar-nama, the Mantiq al-tayr, the Musibat-nama, the Ilahi-nama, the Jawahir-nama and the Sharh al-qalb, and adds that he destroyed the last two with his own hands.

To that list must be added the Mukhtar-nama, a selection of his quatrains, and the Tadhkirat al-awliya, his only prose work. The most disputed case is the Khusraw-nama, a courtly romance also called Gol o Hormoz: Reinert considered it authentic; Mohammad Reza Shafi'i-Kadkani argued that it is a later forgery and that the title by which Attar referred to another work actually belonged to the Ilahi-nama, a thesis Landolt regards as proven; Austin O'Malley reopened the question in 2019 with a manuscript of 1297 that already ascribes it to Attar.

The four mystical masnavis

The Asrar-nama, without a frame story, meditates in twenty-two discourses on the fall of the soul and its release from the bonds of the world. The Mantiq al-tayr, his masterpiece, takes from the Risalat al-tayr ascribed to the Ghazali brothers the assembly of birds seeking a king: led by the hoopoe, they cross seven valleys and only thirty reach the Simorgh, to discover that the Simorgh is themselves, si morgh, 'thirty birds'. The Musibat-nama follows a wayfarer who consults forty beings, from the angel Gabriel to the prophets, until the Universal Soul tells him that what he seeks is within him. In the Ilahi-nama, a caliph answers the worldly wishes of his six sons (the daughter of the king of the fairies, magic, the cup of Jamshid, the water of life, Solomon's ring, alchemy) by showing their inner meaning. The four works say the same thing in four ways: man's goal lies latent within him.

The memorial of the saints

The Tadhkirat al-awliya gathers lives and sayings of the masters of classical Sufism, from Ja'far al-Sadiq, Uways al-Qarani and Hasan of Basra to al-Hallaj, whom Attar regarded as the one who brought Sufism to perfection. The later biographies found in some copies are not his. Attar hardly ever names his sources and reworks the stories in his own way, so the book is of little use as history of the people it portrays but of great value as a document of Sufi sensibility; he also rendered into Persian, very faithfully, sayings transmitted in Arabic. From the second half of the thirteenth century it was widely read; an old Eastern Turkic version in Uyghur script was translated into French by Pavet de Courteille in 1889.

Legacy

Rumi used the metre of the Mantiq al-tayr for his Masnavi and reworked Attar's stories. Tradition wanted more: that the old poet, seeing Baha al-Din Walad's family pass through Nishapur, gave the boy Rumi a copy of the Asrar-nama. Ritter explained the legend as a product of that work's influence on the prologue of the Masnavi, and Franklin Lewis considers it a succession myth. Ali Shir Nava'i adapted the Mantiq al-tayr into Chagatai Turkic and raised the mausoleum at Nishapur, renovated in 1940. Europe came to know him through the Pand-nama translated by Silvestre de Sacy in 1819, now considered apocryphal, and through Garcin de Tassy's edition and translation of the Mantiq al-tayr (1857 and 1863), which so delighted Edward FitzGerald that he rendered it, freely, in his Bird-Parliament, unpublished in his lifetime and issued posthumously in 1889.

Sources: «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource. · FitzGerald, Edward. Letters and Literary Remains of Edward FitzGerald, ed. William Aldis Wright, vol. II. Londres: Macmillan, 1889 (incluye «Bird-Parliament» con la nota de E. B. Cowell sobre su génesis). · Attar, Farid al-Din. The Tadhkiratu 'l-awliya («Memoirs of the saints»), ed. Reynold A. Nicholson, con introducción de Mirza Muhammad Qazvini. 2 vols. Londres y Leiden: Luzac / Brill, 1905–1907 (Persian Historical Texts).

Timeline

A life, year by year

Each point is a documented event. Click to read it, with its source and degree of certainty.

  1. c. 1145 · age 0

    Birth in Nishapur

    Abu Hamid Muhammad, son of Abu Bakr Ibrahim, is born. Foruzanfar calculates c. 540/1145–1146; the 1911 Britannica, following late sources, gave 1119.

    Probable

  2. c. 1170 – 1221

    Druggist and Sufi

    He practises pharmacy in Nishapur and attends many customers; according to his prefaces, he composes the *Musibat-nama* and the *Ilahi-nama* in the shop. The legends of his conversion by a dervish date from the fifteenth century.

    Documented

  3. 1177

    Date of the Mantiq al-tayr

    A closing line of the *Mantiq al-tayr* dates its completion to 573/1177, but it is not found in all manuscripts.

    Disputed

  4. c. 1209

    Meeting with Majd al-Din Baghdadi

    Attar says in the *Tadhkirat al-awliya* that he met Majd al-Din Baghdadi, disciple of Najm al-Din Kubra, who died around 1209; he is the only plausible master among those tradition ascribed to him.

    Probable

  5. c. 1215 – 1221

    Visit of Nasir al-Din Tusi

    The young Tusi visits the aged Attar in Nishapur (between 612/1215 and 618/1221, according to Foruzanfar) and praises his eloquence, as transmitted by his pupil Ibn al-Fuwati.

    Documented

  6. April 1221

    Death in the Mongol sack of Nishapur

    According to the most widespread opinion (Foruzanfar, Reinert), he dies violently in the massacre of Safar 618/April 1221; Landolt considers 1230 possible. The tale of the sack of straw is Dawlatshah's legend.

    Probable

  7. 1297

    Oldest manuscript of the Khusraw-nama

    A copy of 1297, now in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, already contains the romance and its preface under Attar's name: Austin O'Malley adduces it in 2019 against the forgery thesis.

    Documented

  8. 1330

    Mustawfi's mention

    Hamdallah Mustawfi mentions him in the *Tarikh-e guzida*, the third surviving notice after those of Awfi and Tusi.

    Documented

  9. c. 1486

    The legend is born

    In the fifteenth century his work is rediscovered; Jami (*Nafahat al-uns*, 1476–1478) and Dawlatshah (*Tadhkirat al-shu'ara*, 1486) embroider his life with tales of conversion, masters and death. Ali Shir Nava'i raises a mausoleum for him in Nishapur.

    Documented

  10. 1819

    The Pand-nama in Europe

    Silvestre de Sacy publishes in Paris the *Pend-Namèh, ou le Livre des conseils*, the first 'Attar' work translated in Europe; modern scholarship considers it apocryphal.

    Documented

  11. 1857 – 1863

    Garcin de Tassy's edition

    Joseph Garcin de Tassy edits the Persian text of the *Mantiq al-tayr* (1857) and publishes his French translation in 1863; Edward FitzGerald, delighted, composes his free version *Bird-Parliament* (1862, posthumous in 1889).

    Documented

  12. 1905 – 1907

    Nicholson's edition of the Tadhkirat

    Reynold A. Nicholson publishes in London and Leiden, with an introduction by Muhammad Qazvini, the edition of the *Tadhkirat al-awliya* (1905–1907).

    Documented

  13. 1940

    Ilahi-nama edition and renovation of the mausoleum

    Hellmut Ritter publishes the critical edition of the *Ilahi-nama* (Leipzig and Istanbul); the Nishapur mausoleum is fully renovated under Reza Shah.

    Documented

  14. 1941

    Nafisi identifies the 'other Attar'

    Sa'id Nafisi shows in his *Jostoju dar ahval o asar-e Farid al-Din Attar* that the Shi'ite works ascribed to Attar belong to a namesake from Tun who lived in Mashhad some two and a half centuries later.

    Documented

  15. 1984

    Davis and Darbandi translation

    Afkham Darbandi and Dick Davis publish *The Conference of the Birds* in Penguin Classics, the most widely read English verse version.

    Documented

Works

Essential works

The works without which their legacy cannot be understood.

Mantiq al-tayr (The Conference of the Birds) — Attar

Written work · c. 1177

Mantiq al-tayr (The Conference of the Birds)

منطق‌الطیر (Mantiq al-tayr), también مقامات الطیور (Maqamat al-tuyur)

A masnavi of several thousand couplets and Attar's masterpiece. The birds of the world gather to choose a king; the hoopoe, Solomon's messenger, proposes that they seek the Simorgh. Each bird excuses itself with a human weakness (the nightingale's love for the rose, the parrot's longing for immortality, the peacock's paradise) and the hoopoe answers with stories, among them that of Shaykh San'an in love with a Christian girl. Those who set out cross seven valleys: quest, love, knowledge, detachment, unity, bewilderment, and poverty and annihilation. Only thirty arrive, and they discover that the Simorgh is their own reflection: *si morgh*, 'thirty birds'. The frame story comes from the Ghazalis' *Risalat al-tayr*.

14 editions · amazon.com

Written work

Ilahi-nama (The Book of God)

الهی‌نامه (Ilahi-nama)

A masnavi of some 6,500 couplets with a frame story: a caliph asks his six sons what they desire, and each asks for something marvellous (the daughter of the king of the fairies, mastery of magic, Jamshid's world-reflecting cup, the water of life, Solomon's ring, alchemy). The father shows them that, taken literally, these wishes are absurd, but that understood inwardly they can be fulfilled: the princess is the purified soul, the cup is the mystic united with God, the elixir is the divine light that transforms everything. Hundreds of stories, from three to four hundred lines, illustrate the same message as the *Mantiq al-tayr*: what man seeks is within him.

3 editions · amazon.com

Tadhkirat al-awliya (Memorial of God's Friends) — Attar

Written work

Tadhkirat al-awliya (Memorial of God's Friends)

تذکرة الأولیاء (Tadhkirat al-awliya)

Attar's only prose work and the great Persian collection of saints' lives: some seventy biographies of masters of classical Sufism, from Ja'far al-Sadiq, Uways al-Qarani and Hasan of Basra to al-Hallaj, with their sayings and anecdotes, among them those of Rabi'a al-Adawiyya. Attar relies almost solely on written sources he rarely names and reworks the stories with a taste of his own, but he translates the Arabic sayings faithfully. The account of al-Hallaj's execution is its most famous page. Widely read since the thirteenth century, it also matters as a specimen of early Persian prose.

6 editions · amazon.com

Complete works (29)

See all 29 works in the library

Quotations

Quotations located in a specific work. Each carries its provenance and its level of confidence.

Praise to the pure Creator of the soul, who gave the dust a soul and gave it faith.

آفرین جان آفرین پاک را / آن که جان بخشید و ایمان خاک را

VerifiedMantiq al-tayr, dístico inicial («Fi al-tawhid»), texto persa según Ganjoor; traducciones propias.

1 / 6
Apocryphal quotes or disputed attributions (2)
  • «Boundless praise to that pure God who gave faith to a handful of dust.»

    Opening couplet of the *Pand-nama*, which imitates the beginning of the *Mantiq al-tayr*. Ritter considers it apocryphal: there is no trace of the work before the fifteenth century and its language is alien to Attar's, although it was the first work 'of his' translated in Europe (Silvestre de Sacy, 1819).

  • «Praise to the Creator of the soul and soul of the soul, who is both manifest and hidden.»

    Opening of the *Mazhar al-aja'ib*, a fifteenth-century Shi'ite poem composed by the Attar of Tun and ascribed for centuries to Farid al-Din; Sa'id Nafisi showed in 1941 that it belongs to that late namesake.

Last words

Traditional attribution

«Sell me for the sack of straw, for I am worth no more.»

Words put in his mouth by the legend transmitted by Dawlatshah of Samarkand (1486), more than two and a half centuries later: captured by a Mongol soldier, he is said to have refused to be sold for a thousand dirhams and then advised accepting a sack of straw (or fodder), which enraged the soldier, who killed him. It is a Sufi parable on the worth of the self, not a testimony; it is not even certain that he died in 1221.

Source: «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource.

Ask

What their work answers

Twelve great human questions and what their texts allow us to answer, with references. We never put words in their mouth.

  • What is the Absolute? Does God exist?

    The Creator praised is also the mirror where the seeker is lost

    Both personal and impersonalStated explicitly

    Attar opens The Conference of the Birds by praising a personal Creator who gave soul to dust and granted it faith, and in the Memorial of the Saints he gathers prayers addressed to a Thou who answers. But the ending of the same poem shows another face of the divine. The Simurgh, the king the birds seek through seven valleys, turns out to be a mirror: the thirty birds who arrive — si murgh, in Persian — see that those thirty birds are the Simurgh, and the Presence explains to them, without tongue, that whoever arrives sees himself in it. Then they are lost in Him like a shadow in the sun. The Absolute is at once the King who is sought and entreated and the faceless unity in which the seeker is extinguished.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Who am I? Is there a true self?

    The thirty birds discover that they are the Simurgh

    The Self is the AbsoluteStated explicitly

    Attar's answer lies in the ending of The Conference of the Birds. Thousands of birds set out in search of their king, the Simurgh; only thirty survive the seven valleys. On arriving, they see that those thirty birds, si murgh in Persian, are the Simurgh, and the Presence tells them it is a mirror in which whoever arrives sees himself, soul and body. What the seeker finds at the end of the path is not a different object but his own reality in God. To get there one must cross the valley of poverty and annihilation (fana), where the self is consumed like the moth in the flame. The self being sought is not the one that sets out on the journey: it is the one that appears when that one has been extinguished.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Why do we suffer?

    The soul's unrest is longing for the King; its pain is already the path

    Separation from GodStated explicitly

    Attar wrote an entire book on affliction, the Musibat-nama: a restless wayfarer, guided by his master, questions angels, prophets, elements and creatures without anything calming his unrest, until he discovers that what he seeks lies in the ocean of the soul. The root of suffering is separation from the King: the birds of The Conference of the Birds live without a sovereign, scattered and busy with their attachments, and each makes an excuse not to set out. But Attar does not want to suppress this pain. The pain (dard) of the search is precious, because it is what sets one moving: whoever enters the valley of the quest meets a hundred hardships at every moment, and only through them advances. What is truly tragic is not to feel the lack.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • What happens after death?

    Dying to oneself in the valley of annihilation to subsist in God

    Eternal life and resurrectionStated explicitly

    Attar shares the eschatology of Islam, but his attention lies on another death: the one the seeker must pass through in life. The seventh valley of The Conference of the Birds is that of poverty and annihilation (fana), where the self is lost like a drop in the ocean or a moth in the flame; the poem adds that after this extinction the birds are returned to themselves and subsist in God. In the Memorial of the Saints he narrates the death of many masters as the culmination of their path, and his account of the execution of al-Hallaj is one of the most famous. Legend attributes to Attar himself a death at the hands of a Mongol soldier, with a last gesture of detachment, but it is a late account.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • How is liberation or salvation attained?

    Crossing seven valleys with a guide: of thousands of birds, thirty arrive

    Through disciplined practiceStated explicitly

    The Conference of the Birds is an itinerary. The hoopoe announces to the birds that there are seven valleys on the way: the quest, love, knowledge, detachment, unity, bewilderment and, finally, poverty and annihilation; after that lies the King's court. Before setting out, each bird presents its excuse — the nightingale its rose, the hawk its king, the duck its water — and the hoopoe answers each with a story that dismantles its attachment. Liberation thus requires sustained effort, a guide and the progressive renunciation of all that holds one back. Many die on the way or give up; only thirty arrive. What they find at the end, however, is not a reward earned: it is their own annihilation in the Simurgh.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Is a teacher necessary?

    Without the hoopoe, no bird would have set out to seek the King

    IndispensableStated explicitly

    In The Conference of the Birds the birds do not set out on their own: they need the hoopoe, who knows the way, has been with Solomon and knows where the Simurgh lives. Before leaving they cast lots to choose a guide, and the lot falls on her; from then on they follow her, question her and confide their fears to her, and she answers each with a story. In The Book of Affliction the wayfarer also advances accompanied by a master who interprets what each creature tells him. For Attar, without a guide the soul gets lost in its excuses and in the dangers of the journey. The Memorial of the Saints is, at bottom, a gallery of masters whose lives and words serve as a guide to the reader.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Is the world real?

    All the birds are the shadow of the Simurgh

    Manifestation of the divineStated explicitly

    In The Conference of the Birds the hoopoe tells that the Simurgh first manifested itself in China, at midnight, and let fall a feather; all the images and arts of the world arise from the attempt to reproduce it. Later she explains to the birds that when the Simurgh showed its face its shadow fell upon the earth, and from that shadow came the birds: each of them is a shadow of the King it seeks. The world, then, is neither illusion nor autonomous reality but manifestation: reflection, shadow or trace of a beauty that exceeds it. That is why it can lead the seeker to that beauty, and why it can also hold him back, when the shadow is mistaken for the one who casts it.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • What is love?

    Love is a fire that burns reason: the valley of love

    Longing and unionStated explicitly

    In The Conference of the Birds the second valley is that of love: whoever enters it must be all fire, and whoever is not cannot cross it. Love does not calculate, knows neither prudence nor reputation, and that is why Attar constantly sets it against reason, which stops at the threshold. His most famous story shows it to the point of scandal: Shaykh San'an, a venerated master, falls in love with a Christian girl, abandons his faith, tends pigs for her, and returns to Islam only through his disciples' intercession. The story does not approve of apostasy; it teaches that love drags one on to lose everything and that only such total detachment prepares for true Love, in which the lover is finally consumed.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Are we free, or is everything determined?

    No theory of freedom: in the valley of independence, all is God's

    Did not address it

    Attar does not address free will as a theological problem. His poems presuppose both the seeker's decision and God's sovereignty. The birds of The Conference of the Birds choose to set out or to stay, and each is responsible for its excuses; but in the fourth valley, that of independence (istighna), the hoopoe describes a God who needs nothing and no one, before whom a hundred worlds may burn without its mattering. And in the valley of unity everything is discovered to be one, so that the distinction between the one who acts and what happens fades away. Attar lets effort and absolute divine self-sufficiency coexist without trying to reconcile them in a doctrine.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Why meditate or pray?

    The prayer of the saints: intimate converse with God, without calculation

    Friendship with GodInferred from their doctrine

    Attar wrote no treatise on prayer, but his work is full of it. His masnavis open with praises and supplications to God, and the Memorial of the Saints gathers dozens of prayers of the Sufi masters, among them Rabia's famous one, which asks to be burned in hell if she worships from fear and not to be deprived of eternal beauty if she worships for God Himself. In the stories of his poems, the one who truly prays is often God's madman or the beggar, who speaks to the Lord with a frankness that would scandalise the pious. What Attar celebrates is that relationship without intermediaries or calculation, in which the soul addresses God as a Friend, with complaints, entreaties and love.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Can reason know the ultimate?

    Reason stops at the threshold; love and bewilderment go on

    The ultimate lies beyond the mindStated explicitly

    Attar insistently sets love against reason. In the valley of love of The Conference of the Birds reason has no place: love is fire and reason, smoke. In the valley of knowledge each traveller sees according to his capacity, and no knowledge is the same for all. Further on, in the valley of bewilderment (hayrat), the seeker no longer knows anything, not even whether he exists or not, whether he is inside or outside; it is a perplexity worth more than all certainties. The stories of God's madmen that fill his masnavis say the same with humour: the one who has lost his mind sometimes sees more than the sage. For Attar the ultimate is not thought: it is suffered and loved.

    Compare this question with other teachers
  • Withdraw from the world or transform it?

    He wrote his poems in the pharmacy, among hundreds of patients

    Contemplation in actionInferred from their doctrine

    Attar was neither a withdrawn ascetic nor the shaykh of an order, but a pharmacist of Nishapur. In the introduction to the Khusraw-nama he tells that he composed The Book of Affliction and The Divine Book in his pharmacy, where hundreds of patients consulted him every day. His doctrine, however, demands radical detachment: the birds of The Conference of the Birds must abandon wealth, affections and securities, and the fourth valley is that of independence from everything. Attar resolves the tension in a way characteristic of Persian Sufism: detachment is inward and does not require giving up one's trade. One can heal bodies, sell remedies and write verses while the heart travels the valleys of the path.

    Compare this question with other teachers

Anecdotes and stories

Anecdotes and stories

Hagiographic accounts. XII (según la leyenda)

The dervish at the shop

Attar was in his shop in Nishapur, surrounded by jars and goods, when a wandering dervish stopped at the door and gazed sadly inside. The druggist ordered him to move on. "It costs me nothing to go," the dervish replied, "but I pity you: how will you be able to think of death and leave all these goods behind?" The words came at the right moment: Attar closed the shop, became the disciple of a Sufi master and began the life that would make him the great poet of the spiritual path. In some versions the dervish, to show how easy it is to die, lies down on the ground and expires on the spot.

Origin of the story: A story transmitted by Dawlatshah of Samarkand (*Tadhkirat al-shu'ara*, 1486) and summarised by the 1911 *Britannica*; Reinert counts it among the initiation myths created in the fifteenth century. Attar's own work shows that he went on practising as a pharmacist while writing his poems.

Source: «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource.

Hagiographic account1221 (según la leyenda)

A thousand dirhams or a sack of straw

When the Mongols took Nishapur, the legend goes, a soldier captured the aged Attar. Someone offered a thousand dirhams for him, and the poet advised the soldier not to sell, since he would surely be offered more. Soon another man came by and offered a sack of straw, or of horse fodder, for the old man. "Sell me," said Attar, "for I am worth no more." The soldier, enraged at having lost the first offer, killed him on the spot. The tale turns the poet's death into a last lesson on the nothingness of the self, in keeping with the valley of poverty and annihilation in which the *Mantiq al-tayr* culminates.

Origin of the story: Dawlatshah (1486), summarised by the 1911 *Britannica*. That Attar died in the Nishapur massacre of 1221 is the most widespread opinion (Foruzanfar, Reinert), but Landolt allows for 1230; the details of the dialogue are legend.

Source: «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource.

Hagiographic accountc. 1216 (según la leyenda)

The old poet and the boy Rumi

Around 1216 the family of the preacher Baha al-Din Walad left Khorasan heading west. According to tradition, passing through Nishapur they visited the aged Attar, who saw the preacher's son, little Jalal al-Din, and predicted that the child would kindle a fire in the hearts of God's lovers. As a token he gave him a copy of his *Asrar-nama*, the book of secrets. The scene offered Rumi's devotees a perfect chain of transmission between the two great mystical poets of the Persian language, and it is still repeated in almost every popular biography.

Origin of the story: A tradition of the late anthologies. Hellmut Ritter explained it as a reflection of the *Asrar-nama*'s influence on the prologue of the *Masnavi* (Reinert), and Franklin Lewis (2000) considers it a succession myth, as summarised by Landolt. There is no contemporary source for the meeting.

Source: Landolt, Hermann. «Farid al-Din 'Attar». En Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopaedia. Nueva York: Routledge, 2006; versión publicada por The Institute of Ismaili Studies.

Testimony1215–1221

Tusi visits the old druggist

Between 1215 and 1221, a student from Tus who would become one of the great philosophers and astronomers of Islam, Nasir al-Din Tusi, visited Attar in Nishapur when he was already a very old man. Years later he told his pupil Ibn al-Fuwati what had impressed him: the poet's eloquence and his way of interpreting the discourse of the Sufi masters, the knowers of God. Tusi spoke mainly of his 'great divan' and mentioned only one narrative poem, the *Mantiq al-tayr*; he also noted how prolific he was. It is one of only two direct testimonies about Attar that survive.

Origin of the story: Tusi's report transmitted by his pupil Ibn al-Fuwati (d. 1323); dates according to Foruzanfar's reckoning. Recorded by Reinert and Landolt.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Documenteds. XII–XIII

Poems written in the pharmacy

Unlike court poets, Attar did not live by his verse. In the *Asrar-nama* he recalls that he personally attended a great many customers in his pharmacy, and in the second preface of the *Khusraw-nama* he says that he began the *Musibat-nama* and the *Ilahi-nama* while working there. The image of the druggist preparing remedies for the body while composing poems on the healing of the soul is not a later allegory: it is what he himself says. He also tells that, when writing, more ideas came to him than he could use, and that the effort of composition put him in a state that kept him from sleeping.

Origin of the story: Attar's own statements in the *Asrar-nama* (p. 170 and vv. 3146–3151 of Gowharin's edition) and in the second preface of the *Khusraw-nama* (Ritter, 'Philologika X', 1939), recorded by Reinert. Should the *Khusraw-nama* not be his, as Shafi'i-Kadkani argues, this last point would lose support.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Documenteds. XII–XIII

Two books cast into the fire

In the preface to the *Mukhtar-nama*, Attar lists the works he had written and adds an unusual detail: two of them, the *Jawahir-nama* and the *Sharh al-qalb*, he destroyed with his own hands. He does not fully explain his reasons, and nothing but the titles remains of those books. The gesture contrasts with the proud awareness the poet had of his art (he called himself the 'seal of the poets') and with the abundance his contemporaries reproached him for. For modern scholarship it also has a practical value: Attar's list is the starting point for separating his authentic works from the dozens ascribed to him.

Origin of the story: Preface to the *Mukhtar-nama* (text in Ritter, 'Philologika X', pp. 147–153), cited by Reinert and Landolt.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Teachings

Teachings

The notions that structure their thought, explained in context.

The Simorgh and the thirty birdssimurgh
The Simorgh is a fabulous bird of Iranian tradition, wise and benevolent, which in the *Shahnameh* raises the hero Zal. Attar turns it into a symbol of the divine Reality, inaccessible and sovereign, to which all creatures aspire. The outcome of the *Mantiq al-tayr* rests on a pun: *si morgh* means 'thirty birds' in Persian. The thirty birds that survive the journey, now purified, behold the Simorgh and discover that it is their own reflection, and that they are it. The Presence, they are told, is a mirror like the sun: whoever arrives sees himself. Attar thus expresses his deepest conviction, that man finds the supreme Being within himself, but only after measuring the distance between his dependence and the majesty he seeks.

It reworks the motif of the birds' journey to the king from the *Risalat al-tayr* of Avicenna and the Ghazalis.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

The seven valleyshaft-vadi
The hoopoe tells the birds that between them and the Simorgh's court lie seven valleys, from which no one has returned to tell their extent: the quest (*talab*), where everything must be renounced; love (*ishq*), where reason is abandoned; knowledge (*ma'rifat*), in which each wayfarer sees according to his capacity; detachment (*istighna*), where desires and the world lose their worth; unity (*tawhid*), in which all is seen as one; bewilderment (*hayrat*), in which the wayfarer no longer knows anything, not even whether he exists; and poverty and annihilation (*faqr* and *fana*), where the self disappears. Each valley is illustrated with stories. The scheme turns the stations (*maqamat*) of the Sufi path into a narrative itinerary and has become one of the most widespread images of Islamic mysticism.

It turns into an itinerary the stations (*maqamat*) and states (*ahwal*) of the Sufi manuals.

Source: Attar. Obras en persa: Diván, Mantiq al-tayr, Ilahi-nama, Asrar-nama, Musibat-nama, Mujtar-nama, Tadhkirat al-awliya y obras atribuidas (Pand-nama, Bulbul-nama, Ushtur-nama, Yawhar al-dhat, Mazhar al-ayaib, Haylay-nama, Bisar-nama, Waslat-nama, Si fasl, Bayan al-irshad, Nuzhat al-ahbab, Jusraw-nama). Ganjoor.

Love and reasonishq-o-aql
The opposition between reason (*aql*) and love (*ishq*) runs through all of Attar's work, which introduces it as a central theme in the fifth discourse of the *Asrar-nama*. Reason is useful for practical life and for the religious sciences he valued (law, exegesis, prophetic tradition), but it cannot cross the threshold of the divine; love can, because it demands risking everything. Attar distrusted the Aristotelian heritage and never wished to reveal nature's secrets in his poems, not even those of the medicine he knew by trade. His heroes of love are often madmen, beggars or sinners, like Shaykh San'an, who gives up everything for a Christian girl. In the *Mantiq al-tayr*, the valley of love immediately follows that of the quest and precedes that of knowledge.

A common theme of Persian mysticism since Ahmad Ghazali and Sanai; Rumi inherited it from Attar.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Hayrat: bewildermenthayrat
Bewilderment or perplexity (*hayrat*) is for Attar not a failure of knowledge but a necessary stage of the path. In the *Mantiq al-tayr* it is the sixth valley, where the wayfarer, dazzled by the Beloved's beauty, no longer knows whether he exists or not, whether he is inside or outside, lover or beloved. In the *Musibat-nama* the whole poem dramatises inner bewilderment and restlessness: the wayfarer questions forty beings of heaven and earth and all reply that they are as lost as he is. The *Mukhtar-nama* devotes chapters to bewilderment and annihilation. Hellmut Ritter placed this experience at the centre of his study of Attar's 'ocean of the soul'.

A concept present in Islamic mysticism since Dhu'l-Nun and al-Junayd.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Faqr and fana: poverty and annihilationfana
The last of the seven valleys is that of poverty (*faqr*) and annihilation (*fana*): the wayfarer, stripped of everything, vanishes in the divine ocean like a drop in the sea, and only then can permanence (*baqa*) be spoken of. Attar insists that this is not destruction but transformation: in the *Ilahi-nama* he defines true alchemy as the passage of body into heart and of heart into pain, and in the *Musibat-nama* the Universal Soul asks the wayfarer to cast himself into the ocean of the soul and efface himself completely. The legend of his death, in which the poet declares himself worth less than a sack of straw, is the popular staging of this doctrine.

Classical Sufi doctrine formulated by al-Junayd and Bayazid; in al-Hallaj, hero of the *Tadhkirat*, it reaches its extreme expression.

Source: Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.

Videos

Videos

Recordings, interviews and documentaries. Videos play from YouTube; they are not hosted here.

  • The Long Journey Home | Attar's «The Conference of the Birds» | Spotlight

    Analysis· EN· 2022· 7 min

    The MetOfficial channel

  • Attar's «Conference of the Birds» — The Greatest Sufi Masterpiece?

    Analysis· EN· 25 min

    Let's Talk Religion

  • Life-changing power of Attar's Conference of the Birds

    Interview· EN· 3 min

    Sholeh WolpéOfficial channel

  • La quête de l'Autre : «Le cantique des oiseaux» d'Attâr par Leili Anvar

    Lecture· FR· 2014· 59 min

    Résonance[s]

  • Et Dieu dans tout ça : «Le cantique des oiseaux» d'Attâr avec Leili Anvar

    Interview· FR· 2012· 18 min

    Résonance[s]

  • Leili Anvar présente le livre d'art Le Cantique des oiseaux sur Public Sénat

    Interview· FR· 9 min

    Éditions Diane de SelliersOfficial channel

  • Lecture du Cantique des Oiseaux d'Attâr au Festival des Musiques Sacrées de Fès 2014

    Third-party recording· FR· 2014· 68 min

    Transcordancias | Global Music Live

  • Philosophie et Littérature — Attar : La Conférence des Oiseaux (Jeudis Philo)

    Lecture· FR· 106 min

    Ancrages Éditions

  • هفت شهر عشق عطار ۱ (Las siete ciudades del amor de Attar, 1)

    Lecture· FA· 26 min

    Dr Elahi Ghomshei — canal oficialOfficial channel

  • دکتر الهی قمشه‌ای — آشنایی با عطار نیشابوری

    Lecture· FA· 2025· 39 min

    Majalle-ye farhangi-honari-ye Attar

  • حکایت نوشیروان و پیرمرد | الهی نامه عطار نیشابوری

    Third-party recording· FA· 28 min

    Rashid KakavandOfficial channel

  • مختارنامه | رباعیات عطار نیشابوری

    Third-party recording· FA· 2026· 24 min

    Rashid KakavandOfficial channel

  • La conferencia de los pájaros — Farid ud-Din Attar

    Analysis· ES· 2022· 3 min

    Universidad Externado de ColombiaOfficial channel

Gallery

Gallery

Images with verified licences. Each keeps its authorship and attribution.

Manuscripts

Manuscripts

Manuscript witnesses and ancient texts, with their custodian and conditions of access.

  • FA · Nastaliq · c. 1177 (texto)

    منطق‌الطیر (Mantiq al-tayr), manuscrito de Herat

    Surviving witness
    Códice copiado en 892/1487 por Sultán Ali Mashhadi; pinturas timúridas y otras añadidas hacia 1600 por Habiballah de Saveh
    Custodian
    Metropolitan Museum of Art, Nueva York · 63.210
  • FA · Perso-árabe · s. XII–XIII

    خسرونامه (Khusraw-nama), copia de 1297

    Surviving witness
    Manuscrito fechado en 1297 que contiene el romance y su prólogo atribuido a Attar
    Custodian
    Bibliothèque nationale de France, París
  • CHG · Uigur · s. XIII (original persa)

    تذکرة الأولیاء (Tadhkirat al-awliya), versión turca oriental en escritura uigur

    Surviving witness
    Manuscrito de la Biblioteca Nacional de Francia traducido por Pavet de Courteille (*Tezkereh-i-Evliâ*, 1889-1890)
    Custodian
    Bibliothèque nationale de France, París
Manuscripts →

Connections

Connections

Influences, discipleships and affinities. Documented relations are distinguished from similarities identified by analysis.

  • Influenced

    Rumi

    Documented literary influence: Rumi adopted the metre of the *Mantiq al-tayr* for the *Masnavi* and reworked Attar's stories. By contrast, the meeting in Nishapur in which the aged Attar supposedly gave the *Asrar-nama* to the boy Rumi is a late legend: Ritter explained it by that work's influence on the prologue of the *Masnavi*, and Franklin Lewis considers it a succession myth (classification: hagiographic, no contemporary source).

    Documented relation

  • Influenced by

    Al-Ghazali

    The frame story of the *Mantiq al-tayr* comes from the *Risalat al-tayr* ascribed to Ahmad Ghazali or to his brother Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali; Attar expanded and deepened the allegory.

    Documented relation

  • Influenced by

    Al-Hallaj

    Attar closes the *Tadhkirat al-awliya* with the life and martyrdom of al-Hallaj, whom he regarded as the perfecter of Sufism; the apocryphal *Jawhar al-dhat* and other 'second group' works make him their central figure.

    Documented relation

  • Influenced by

    Rabia al-Adawiyya

    Attar devotes a chapter of the *Tadhkirat al-awliya* to Rabi'a, the main source for many of her sayings and anecdotes in the Persian tradition, among them the prayer of disinterested love.

    Documented relation

  • Contemporary of

    Ibn Arabi

    Contemporaries (Ibn Arabi was born in 1165 and Attar died around 1221), at the two ends of the Islamic world; no contact or mutual knowledge of their works is recorded.

    Documented relation

  • Ideas akin to

    Hafez

    Attar's *qalandari* ghazals, with their language of wine and the libertine, anticipate the figure of the *rend* that Hafez brought to its most refined form.

    Similarity identified by analysis

  • Ideas akin to

    Kabir

    Both teach that what is sought lies within the seeker and distrust outward religion; no historical connection is known.

    Similarity identified by analysis

Sources

Sources

Bibliography and catalogues consulted for this profile.

  1. Wikidata, Q194091 «Attar of Nishapur» (P31=Q5; 69 enlaces entre wikis; P569 1145-03; P570 1221-04-26; P1559 فَریدالدّین ابوحامِد محمّد عطّار نِیشابوری).
  2. Reinert, Bernd. «ʿAṭṭār, Farīd-al-Dīn». Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. III, fasc. 1, pp. 20–25. Publicado el 15-12-1987.
  3. Landolt, Hermann. «Farid al-Din 'Attar». En Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopaedia. Nueva York: Routledge, 2006; versión publicada por The Institute of Ismaili Studies.
  4. O'Malley, Austin. «An Unexpected Romance: Reevaluating the Authorship of the Khosrow-nāma». Al-'Usur al-Wusta 27 (2019), pp. 201–232. DOI 10.7916/alusur.v27i1.6785.
  5. «Farīd ud-Dīn ʽAttār». Encyclopædia Britannica, 11.ª ed., vol. 10. Cambridge, 1910–1911 (resume los relatos de Dawlatshah sobre su conversión y su muerte). Texto en Wikisource.
  6. Attar. Obras en persa: Diván, Mantiq al-tayr, Ilahi-nama, Asrar-nama, Musibat-nama, Mujtar-nama, Tadhkirat al-awliya y obras atribuidas (Pand-nama, Bulbul-nama, Ushtur-nama, Yawhar al-dhat, Mazhar al-ayaib, Haylay-nama, Bisar-nama, Waslat-nama, Si fasl, Bayan al-irshad, Nuzhat al-ahbab, Jusraw-nama). Ganjoor.
  7. «Attar of Nishapur». Wikipedia en inglés (mausoleo de Navai y su renovación de 1940; recepción moderna).
  8. FitzGerald, Edward. Letters and Literary Remains of Edward FitzGerald, ed. William Aldis Wright, vol. II. Londres: Macmillan, 1889 (incluye «Bird-Parliament» con la nota de E. B. Cowell sobre su génesis).
  9. Attar, Farid al-Din. The Tadhkiratu 'l-awliya («Memoirs of the saints»), ed. Reynold A. Nicholson, con introducción de Mirza Muhammad Qazvini. 2 vols. Londres y Leiden: Luzac / Brill, 1905–1907 (Persian Historical Texts).
Rights holder
Dominio público (obra de los siglos XII–XIII). Las ediciones críticas (Shafii-Kadkani, Sukhan) y las traducciones modernas (Penguin, Norton, Islamic Texts Society, Paulist Press, Manchester University Press, Cerf, Diane de Selliers, Seuil, Fayard…) están sujetas a los derechos de sus editores y traductores.

Pending confirmation

What this profile has not yet been able to settle. We would rather say so than fill it in.

  • Sala de lectura en inglés: el *Bird-Parliament* de FitzGerald (dominio público) solo se ha encontrado dentro del vol. II de *Letters and Literary Remains* (archive.org/details/lettersliteraryr02fitziala, OCR limpio), que contiene otras obras; no se registra hasta hallar una página propia.
  • Sala de lectura en francés: la traducción de Garcin de Tassy (1863) está en Internet Archive con un OCR inservible (texto francés leído como persa); buscar una transcripción limpia (Wikisource o Gallica en modo texto).
  • No se ha encontrado traducción española del *Ilahi-nama*, del *Musibat-nama* ni del *Asrar-nama* en Open Library; confirmar traductor de las ediciones de Humanitas (2007), Troquel (1994) y de «72 santos sufíes» (Hastinapura, 2000), y si esta última procede del *Tadhkirat*.
  • Localizar ISBN de las ediciones críticas de Shafii-Kadkani del *Ilahi-nama*, *Asrar-nama*, *Musibat-nama*, *Mujtar-nama* y *Tadhkirat* (Sukhan).
  • Imagen: la miniatura de Hossein Behzad (1960) que usa Wikidata como retrato figura en Commons como dominio público por la ley iraní, pero el pintor murió en 1968; no se ha incluido por dudas sobre su situación en la UE.
  • Verificar con la edición impresa (Shafii-Kadkani, introducción al *Ilahi-nama*) la tesis de que el *Jusraw-nama* citado por Attar es el *Ilahi-nama*; aquí se apoya en Landolt (2006). Leer el artículo de O'Malley (2019), del que solo se ha consultado el resumen.
  • Comprobar el enlace de la ficha del Met (63.210) y la signatura del manuscrito de 1297 del *Jusraw-nama* en la BnF.
  • Vídeos en español de canales institucionales: solo uno (Universidad Externado de Colombia); faltan documentales de televisiones públicas.

Researched on 2026-10-25