الانتقال إلى المحتوى
The ConsciousLibrary

المسيحية · التصوف المسيحي · المسيحية الأرثوذكسية

Pavel Florensky

Павел Александрович Флоренский

1882 – 1937شخصية موثّقة تاريخيًا

كاهن أرثوذكسي ولاهوتي وفيلسوف ورياضيّ ومهندس روسي (1882–1937)، يُلقَّب كثيرًا بـ«ليوناردو الروسي». جدّد كتابه «عمود الحقّ وقاعدته» (1914) اللاهوت الأرثوذكسي بصوفيولوجيا ونظرية في النقائض؛ وأسّس كتابا «الإيقونسطاس» و«المنظور المعكوس» فلسفةً للأيقونة. عمل بثوبه الكهنوتي في مشروع الكهربة السوفييتي، ونُفي سنة 1933 إلى معسكرات الغولاغ، وكتب إلى أبنائه من جزر سولوفكي، ثم أعدمته مفوضية الشعب للشؤون الداخلية رميًا بالرصاص في 8 ديسمبر 1937.

مؤلَّفًا
43مؤلَّفًا
طبعة
69طبعة
اقتباسًا
6اقتباسًا
مقطع فيديو
13مقطع فيديو
صورة
7صورة
«Filósofos»: Florenski y Bulgákov, por Mijaíl Nésterov

«Filósofos»: Florenski y Bulgákov, por Mijaíl Nésterov · Public domain

بكلماته

«Living religious experience as the sole legitimate way of knowing dogmas.»

«Столп и утверждение истины» (1914), «К читателю», primera frase: así resume el autor la intención de todo el libro.

فكرته المحورية

Antinomy: For Florensky religious truth is antinomic: it can be stated only through pairs of contradictory propositions, equally true, which discursive reason cannot reconcile.

السيرة

4 دقيقة قراءة

ترجمة مُعانة من الأصل الإسباني، بانتظار مراجعة مترجم من أهل اللغة.

طفل من القوقاز

وُلد بافل ألكسندروفيتش فلورينسكي في 21 يناير 1882 (9 منه بحسب التقويم اليولياني) في يفلاخ، في أذربيجان الحالية، حيث كان أبوه، ألكسندر إيفانوفيتش، وهو مهندس من أسرة إكليريكية لكنه بعيد عن الكنيسة، يعمل في إنشاء سكة حديد ما وراء القوقاز. أمّا أمّه، أولغا (سالومي) بافلوفنا ساباروفا، فكانت من أسرة أرمنية عريقة من قره باغ. كان البكر بين سبعة إخوة، ونشأ بين تفليس وباطومي في بيت مثقّف لا يبالي بالدين. وسيروي بنفسه في «إلى أبنائي» أنّه عاش طفلًا في «جنّة عدن» من ظواهر الطبيعة — البحر والحجارة والنبات —، وأنّ غوته كان غذاءه الفكري قبل أيّ فيلسوف.

رياضيّ في موسكو

في 1900 أنهى دراسته الثانوية في الغيمنازيوم الثاني في تفليس، والتحق بكلية الفيزياء والرياضيات في جامعة موسكو. وهناك تتلمذ على نيكولاي بوغاييف، وصادق أندريه بيلي، وعن طريقه بريوسوف وبالمونت وآل ميريجكوفسكي وبلوك، ونشر في مجلتَي «نوفي بوت» و«فيسي» مقالات من قبيل «في رموز اللانهاية» (1904)، المخصّصة لنظرية المجموعات عند كانتور. وفي تلك السنوات اجتذبه فلاديمير سولوفيوف والأرشمندريت سيرابيون (ماشكين). وفي 1904 تخرّج بشهادة من الدرجة الأولى، لكنه بدل أن يسلك طريق العلم التحق، ببركة الأسقف أنطونيوس (فلورينسوف)، بالأكاديمية اللاهوتية في موسكو، في سيرغييف بوساد.

الأكاديمية اللاهوتية

في مارس 1906، وهو لا يزال طالبًا، ألقى في كنيسة الأكاديمية عظة ضدّ عقوبة الإعدام بعنوان «صرخة الدم»، طُبعت من غير أن تمرّ على الرقابة؛ فاعتُقل وقضى فترة قصيرة في السجن. وأتمّ دراسته سنة 1908، وبقي في الأكاديمية مدرّسًا لتاريخ الفلسفة. وفي 1910 تزوّج آنا ميخايلوفنا غياتسينتوفا، وأنجب منها خمسة أبناء — فاسيلي وكيريل وأولغا وميخائيل وماريا —، ورُسم كاهنًا سنة 1911. ومن 1912 إلى 1917 تولّى رئاسة تحرير مجلة الأكاديمية «بوغوسلوفسكي فيستنيك» (البشير اللاهوتي)، وخدم كاهنًا في كنيسة ملجأ الصليب الأحمر في سيرغييف بوساد.

عمود الحقّ وقاعدته

في 1914 نشر، في صيغة موسّعة، العمل الذي بدأه طالبًا: «عمود الحقّ وقاعدته: محاولة في الثيوديسيا الأرثوذكسية في اثنتي عشرة رسالة». وقد كُتب على هيئة مراسلة مع صديق، ويمزج اللاهوت بالرياضيات وفقه اللغة وتاريخ الفنّ والتجربة الصوفية. وهو يذهب إلى أنّ الحقّ لا يُبرهَن عليه بل يُعاش في الكنيسة، وأنّ العقيدة نقيضيّة — لا يمكن التعبير عنها إلا في قضايا متعارضة لا يوفّق العقل بينها —، وأنّ الحكمة الإلهية، صوفيا، هي جذر الخليقة. وقد فتن الكتاب، الذي كرّمته الأكاديمية بجائزة، بعضَ القرّاء وأثار سخط آخرين: فقد سمّاه بيردياييف «أرثوذكسية مُؤسلَبة».

ظلّ: قضية بيليس

وفي تلك السنوات نفسها خلّف فلورينسكي كتابات يؤثر المعجبون به نسيانها. فخلال محاكمة مناحيم بيليس سنة 1913، وهو يهودي من كييف اتُّهم زورًا بالقتل الطقسي، أرسل إلى فاسيلي روزانوف مقالتين بلا توقيع يسلّم فيهما بصحّة التهمة؛ فنشرهما روزانوف ملحقًا بكتابه عن علاقة اليهود بالدم. وقد رأى فيهما النقّاد انتقالًا من معاداة مسيحية لليهودية إلى معاداة للسامية ذات طابع عرقي.

الثورة والأيقونات والمنظور

استقبل الثورة بوصفها رؤيا أخروية، ومال إلى ملكية ثيوقراطية، لكنه لم يهاجر. ومن 1918 إلى 1920 كان الأمين العلمي للجنة حماية آثار دير الثالوث والقديس سيرغي (اللافرا)، فصنّف أيقوناته ودافع عن ألّا يتحوّل الدير إلى «متحف ميّت». وآنذاك كتب نصوصه في العبادة والفنّ: «المنظور المعكوس» (1919)، الذي يفسّر فيه منظور الأيقونة بوصفه طريقة أخرى لتمثيل فضاء روحي، و«الإيقونسطاس» (1922)، الذي يرى فيه أنّ الأيقونة نافذة، وأنّ الإيقونسطاس هو الحدّ الفاصل بين العالم المنظور والعالم غير المنظور.

الكاهن المهندس

منذ 1919 عمل عالمًا في خدمة الدولة السوفييتية من غير أن يخلع ثوبه الكهنوتي قطّ: في مصنع «كاربوليت» للّدائن، وفي قسم علم المواد في «غلافينيرغو»، وفي خطة الكهربة «غويلرو». وألّف دراسة في العوازل الكهربائية (1924)، وسجّل براءات اختراع، ودرّس من 1921 إلى 1927 في المحترفات الفنية «فخوتيماس»، وكان من محرّري «الموسوعة التقنية» التي كتب لها نحو مئة وخمسين مقالة. وفي 1922 نشر «المتخيَّلات في الهندسة»، الذي استند فيه إلى دانتي وإلى النسبية دفاعًا عن كوسمولوجيا تجعل الأرض مركز الكون، فهوجم بوصفه ظلاميًا.

سيبيريا وجزر سولوفكي

في 1928 نُفي إلى نيجني نوفغورود؛ وبفضل يكاترينا بيشكوفا تمكّن من العودة، وعُرض عليه أن يهاجر إلى براغ، لكنه آثر البقاء. وفي 26 فبراير 1933 اعتُقل في قضية ملفّقة ضدّ منظمة معادية للثورة مزعومة، وفي 26 يوليو حُكم عليه بعشر سنوات في معسكرات العمل. ومرّ بمعسكر سفوبودني في الشرق الأقصى، وبمحطة التجارب الخاصة بالتربة الصقيعية في سكوفورودينو، ثم نُقل في خريف 1934 إلى جزر سولوفكي، حيث بحث في استخلاص اليود والآغار من الطحالب. ومن هناك كتب إلى زوجته وأمّه وأبنائه أكثر من مئة رسالة تفيض علمًا وشعرًا وحنانًا.

8 ديسمبر 1937

في 25 نوفمبر 1937، إبّان الرعب الكبير، حكمت عليه «ترويكا» تابعة لمفوضية الشعب للشؤون الداخلية (NKVD) في مقاطعة لينينغراد بالإعدام. وفي 8 ديسمبر أُعدم رميًا بالرصاص مع سجناء آخرين نُقلوا من سولوفكي؛ ولم يُعرف مكان الإعدام ولا المقبرة الجماعية، ويُذكر ليفاشوفو وميادين رمي أخرى في ضواحي لينينغراد. وظلّت الأسرة سنوات طويلة تُبلَّغ بتاريخ وفاة زائف هو 15 ديسمبر 1943. ثم جاءت وثائق ملفّ القضية، المحفوظة في أرشيف الأجهزة الأمنية والتي فُتحت بعد البيريسترويكا، لتثبت الحكم وتاريخ الإعدام. ورُدّ إليه الاعتبار سنتَي 1958 و1959.

الإرث

أُعيد اكتشاف فلورينسكي في الستينيات والسبعينيات، حين شرعت مجلة بطريركية موسكو في نشر نصوصه غير المنشورة، وصدرت أعماله الكاملة في روسيا ابتداءً من 1994. وقد أثّرت نظريته في المنظور المعكوس وفلسفته في الأيقونة في تاريخ الفنّ وفي السيميائيات، وجعلت منه جمعُه بين العلم والإيمان رمزًا للإنتلجنسيا الدينية التي أبادها النظام السوفييتي. وقد حرّر حفيده، رئيس الدير أندرونيك (تروباتشيوف)، أعماله، وأسّس المتحف الذي يحمل اسمه في سيرغييف بوساد.

المصادر: Pyman, Avril. Pavel Florensky: A Quiet Genius. The Tragic and Extraordinary Life of Russia's Unknown da Vinci. Nueva York y Londres: Continuum, 2010. · Florenski, P. A. Столп и утверждение истины. Опыт православной феодицеи в двенадцати письмах [La columna y el fundamento de la verdad]. Moscú: Put, 1914. Texto en Azbuka. · Florenski, P. A. Иконостас [El iconostasio] (1922). Богословские труды, n.º 9 (1972), pp. 83–148. Texto en Azbuka. · Florenski, P. A. Письма с Соловков [Cartas desde las Solovkí], en Сочинения в 4 томах, t. 4: Письма с Дальнего Востока и Соловков, ed. igumeno Andronik (Trubachov) et al. Moscú: Mysl, 1998, pp. 139–781. Texto en Azbuka. · Florenski, P. A. Детям моим. Воспоминания прошлых дней [A mis hijos. Recuerdos de días pasados] (1916–1926). Moscú: Moskovski rabochi, 1992. Texto en Azbuka.

الخط الزمني

الحياة عامًا بعد عام

كل نقطة حدث موثّق. انقر لتقرأه مع مصدره ودرجة اليقين فيه.

  1. 21 يناير 1882 · أقل من عام

    Birth

    Born (9 January Old Style), the first of seven children of the railway engineer Alexander Florensky and Olga Saparova.

    موثّق

  2. 1900 · 18 عامًا

    Moscow University

    Finishes at the Second Tiflis Gymnasium and enters Physics and Mathematics at Moscow University.

    موثّق

  3. 1904 · 22 عامًا

    From mathematics to theology

    Graduates with a first-class diploma and, with Bishop Antony (Florensov)'s blessing, enters the Moscow Theological Academy. Publishes 'On the Symbols of Infinity'.

    موثّق

  4. مارس 1906 · 24 عامًا

    'The Cry of Blood'

    His sermon against the death penalty, printed without censorship, leads to his arrest and a short spell in prison.

    مرجَّح

  5. 1908 · 26 عامًا

    Academy lecturer

    Completes his studies and begins teaching the history of philosophy at the Theological Academy.

    موثّق

  6. 1910 · 28 عامًا

    Marriage

    Marries Anna Mikhailovna Giatsintova (1889–1973); they will have five children.

    موثّق

  7. 1911 · 29 عامًا

    Ordination

    He is ordained priest; from 1912 to 1917 he edits Bogoslovsky vestnik.

    موثّق

  8. 1913 · 31 عامًا

    The Beilis articles

    Sends Rozanov two anonymous articles that treat as true the ritual-murder accusation against Menahem Beilis.

    موثّق

  9. 1914 · 32 عامًا

    The Pillar and Ground of the Truth

    The Put publishing house issues his major work, an enlargement of his master's thesis.

    موثّق

  10. 1918 – 1920 · 36 عامًا

    The Lavra Commission

    Scientific secretary of the Commission for the Protection of the Monuments of the Trinity–St Sergius Lavra (1918–1920).

    موثّق

  11. 1919 · 37 عامًا

    Reverse Perspective and scientific work

    Writes 'Reverse Perspective' and begins working as a scientist at the Karbolit plant and then at Glavenergo.

    موثّق

  12. 1921 – 1927 · 39 عامًا

    Professor at VKhUTEMAS

    At Vladimir Favorsky's recommendation he teaches at the VKhUTEMAS art workshops until 1927.

    موثّق

  13. 1922 · 40 عامًا

    Iconostasis and Imaginaries in Geometry

    Writes Iconostasis (published 1972) and publishes Imaginaries in Geometry at his own expense.

    موثّق

  14. 1924 · 42 عامًا

    Dielectrics

    Publishes Dielectrics and Their Technical Application.

    موثّق

  15. 1927 · 45 عامًا

    Technical Encyclopedia

    Joins the editorial board of the Technical Encyclopedia, for which he writes some 150 articles.

    موثّق

  16. 1928 · 46 عامًا

    Exile and refusal to emigrate

    Exiled to Nizhny Novgorod; thanks to Ekaterina Peshkova he returns and is offered emigration to Prague, but decides to stay.

    موثّق

  17. 26 فبراير 1933 · 51 عامًا

    Arrest

    Arrested by the OGPU; on 26 July he is sentenced to ten years in a labour camp.

    موثّق

  18. 1 ديسمبر 1933 · 51 عامًا

    Svobodny camp

    Arrives at the BAMLAG camp at Svobodny; in February 1934 he moves to the experimental permafrost station at Skovorodino.

    موثّق

  19. 15 نوفمبر 1934 · 52 عامًا

    Solovki

    Begins work at the iodine factory of the Solovki camp, to which he had been moved in the autumn.

    موثّق

  20. 18 يونيو 1937 · 55 عامًا

    Last surviving letter

    Date of letter no. 103 to his wife, the last of those published in his Letters from Solovki.

    مرجَّح

  21. 25 نوفمبر 1937 · 55 عامًا

    Death sentence

    A special NKVD troika of the Leningrad region sentences him to death.

    موثّق

  22. 8 ديسمبر 1937 · 55 عامًا

    Execution

    Shot by the NKVD; the site of the grave remains unestablished. The family was given a false date (15 December 1943).

    موثّق

  23. 5 مايو 1958

    Rehabilitation

    Rehabilitated for the 1933 conviction; on 5 March 1959, for that of 1937.

    موثّق

  24. 1972

    Iconostasis published

    Bogoslovskie trudy, a journal of the Moscow Patriarchate, publishes Iconostasis, fifty years after it was written.

    موثّق

المؤلَّفات

المؤلَّفات الأساسية

المؤلَّفات التي لا يُفهم إرثه من دونها.

The Pillar and Ground of the Truth: An Essay in Orthodox Theodicy in Twelve Letters — Pavel Florensky

مؤلَّف مكتوب · 1914

The Pillar and Ground of the Truth: An Essay in Orthodox Theodicy in Twelve Letters

Столп и утверждение истины. Опыт православной феодицеи в двенадцати письмах

His capital work, published by Put in 1914. Twelve letters to a friend — doubt, the Trinity, the light of truth, the Comforter, contradiction, sin, Gehenna, the creature, Sophia, friendship and jealousy — with extensive mathematical, philological and iconographic appendices. It holds that truth is reached by living religious experience rather than deduction; that dogma is antinomic; that the Trinity is the foundation of all truth; that Sophia is the root of creation; and that friendship, the 'we' of two, is the cell of the Church. It influenced Bulgakov and Losev and was criticised by Berdyaev and Florovsky.

غير متوفّر اعرض الكتاب

8 طبعات

Iconostasis — Pavel Florensky

مؤلَّف نُشر بعد الوفاة · 1922

Iconostasis

Иконостас

Written in 1922 and published in 1972 in Bogoslovskie trudy. Starting from the experience of dreams, which separate and join two worlds, it defines the icon as a window onto the invisible and the iconostasis as the boundary between the visible and invisible worlds, formed by the saints themselves. It defends the technique of the icon — egg tempera, gold, construction in layers of light — as the expression of an ontology of light, against the oil painting and perspective of Western art.

غير متوفّر اعرض الكتاب

5 طبعات

مؤلَّف مكتوب · 1922

Imaginaries in Geometry

Мнимости в геометрии. Расширение области двухмерных образов геометрии (Опыт нового истолкования мнимостей)

A short treatise published at the author's expense in 1922. It proposes interpreting imaginary numbers as the reverse side of a surface, and applies this to relativity: beyond the speed of light an 'imaginary' space, the invisible world, would begin. Drawing on Dante's Paradiso, it defends a geocentric cosmology and places the boundary between Earth and Heaven between the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. Its cover was designed by Vladimir Favorsky.

غير متوفّر اعرض الكتاب

3 طبعات

Letters from the Far East and Solovki — Pavel Florensky

مراسلات · 1998

Letters from the Far East and Solovki

Письма с Дальнего Востока и Соловков

Letters written between 1933 and 1937 from the camps of Svobodny, Skovorodino and Solovki to his wife, his mother and his five children, to whom he gave lessons in physics, chemistry, botany, poetry and music. Published in part from the 1980s and complete in 1998 (vol. 4 of his Works). They are one of the great spiritual testimonies of the Gulag.

غير متوفّر اعرض الكتاب

6 طبعات

جميع مؤلَّفاته (43)

اطّلع على أعماله الـ43 في المكتبة

الأقوال

أقوال محدَّدة الموضع في مؤلَّف بعينه. كل منها يحمل مصدره ودرجة الثقة به.

Living religious experience as the sole legitimate way of knowing dogmas.

Живой религиозный опыт, как единственный законный способ познания догматов.

متحقَّق منه«Столп и утверждение истины» (1914), «К читателю», primera frase: así resume el autor la intención de todo el libro.

1 / 6

الكلمات الأخيرة

لا توجد سجلات يمكن التحقق منها لكلماته الأخيرة.

His last words are not known. He was shot by the NKVD on 8 December 1937, together with other prisoners transferred from Solovki, at an unestablished place outside Leningrad; there were no witnesses who left an account. His last known letter to his family, no. 103 in the 1998 edition, is dated 18 June 1937: it speaks of the lack of work in the Solovki Kremlin, of his corner with a view of the sea in the monastery museum and of how much he would regret leaving the sea.

المصدر: Florenski, P. A. Письма с Соловков [Cartas desde las Solovkí], en Сочинения в 4 томах, t. 4: Письма с Дальнего Востока и Соловков, ed. igumeno Andronik (Trubachov) et al. Moscú: Mysl, 1998, pp. 139–781. Texto en Azbuka.

اسأل

بماذا يجيب أثره

اثنا عشر سؤالًا كبيرًا من أسئلة الإنسانية، وما تتيح نصوصه الإجابة به عنها، مع المراجع. ولا نقوّله ما لم يقل أبدًا.

  • ما المطلق؟ هل الله موجود؟

    The truth that proves itself is the Trinity, and the icon bears witness to it

    إله شخصييقوله صراحةً

    Florensky starts, in The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, from living religious experience as the only legitimate way of knowing dogmas. In the letter on doubt he follows scepticism to its end and concludes that only a truth that is at once subject and relation, an I that gives itself to a Thou and recognises itself in a He, can stand: the Trinity. His God is personal and tri-personal, and his inner life is self-giving love. To this speculative path he adds an aesthetic one: in Iconostasis he asserts that, since Rublev's Trinity exists, God exists, and presents this as the most convincing proof, one the textbooks never mention. For him the icon does not illustrate an idea: it is a window through which the invisible lets itself be seen.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • من أنا؟ هل توجد ذات حقيقية؟

    The self finds itself only in love and in friendship

    ذات تُصقَل في العلاقةيقوله صراحةً

    Florensky criticises the identity of the self conceived as the logical law A is A. In The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, such closed self-affirmation is the very form of sin and death: a self that only repeats itself becomes empty. True personal identity is reached by going out of oneself, when the self gives itself to another and receives itself from him; its model is Trinitarian life, in which each person is what it is through its relation to the others. That is why he devotes an entire letter to friendship, which he understands from the tradition of spiritual brotherhood in the early Church, as the experience in which two persons become consubstantial without being confused. The self is real and immortal, but it is found only in communion.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • لماذا نتألّم؟

    Sin is self-assertion that disintegrates; the true gift is paid for in pain

    الانفصال عن اللهيقوله صراحةً

    In The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, Florensky defines sin as the self-assertion of an I that shuts itself into its empty identity and breaks communion; its consequence is inner disintegration, the loss of the person's integrity, and its end is gehenna, the loneliness of one who can no longer go out of himself. Suffering is the fruit of that separation, but love also includes it: in the letter on Sophia he writes that love eternally takes away in order eternally to give, and puts to death in order to bring to life. His own life confirmed it: from Solovki, shortly before he was shot, he wrote to his wife that the more selfless the gift, the harsher the persecution and the more severe the suffering, and called this the law of life.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • ماذا يحدث بعد الموت؟

    Before gehenna, an antinomy: salvation of all and eternal damnation at once

    الحياة الأبدية والقيامةيقوله صراحةً

    Florensky addresses what happens after death in the letter on gehenna in The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, and he does so with his method of antinomy. On one hand, God's love demands that all be saved; on the other, the creature's freedom makes eternal damnation possible. Neither thesis can be eliminated without betraying faith, and reason must accept holding them together. His solution points to a distinction within the person: what in it is the image of God is saved, while what sin has built, its caricature, burns and is separated. Beyond speculation, his faith in the resurrection is that of the Orthodox Church, which he lived until his execution in 1937, as his letters from Solovki show.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • كيف يُبلَغ التحرّر أو الخلاص؟

    Salvation is lived in the Church: ascesis, sacrament and transfiguring love

    بالنعمة والمحبةيقوله صراحةً

    Florensky presents salvation as incorporation into the life of truth, reached not by reasoning but by experience: the living religious experience he defines at the start of The Pillar and Ground of the Truth as the only legitimate path to the dogmas. That experience is given in the Church, through ascesis, which restores the integrity of the person broken up by sin, through the sacraments and through brotherly love. Its fruit is transfiguration: in the letter on the light of truth he reproduces the passage where Motovilov sees Seraphim illumined, as an example of what grace does in the flesh. In The Philosophy of Cult he adds that liturgical worship is the place where the human and the divine meet and where the whole of reality is sanctified.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • هل نحتاج إلى معلّم؟

    Truth is received in the Church and in the spiritual fatherhood of an elder

    الجماعة والتقليديقوله صراحةً

    Florensky came to faith as an adult, from science, and his path was marked by concrete figures: Bishop Antony Florensov, whom he regarded as his spiritual father, and the elder Isidore of Gethsemane, to whom he devoted The Salt of the Earth, a portrait of an elder's simple holiness. His theology holds that truth is not passed on as information, but by incorporation into the living experience of the Church, its sacraments, its worship and its saints. In The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, written as letters to a friend, the genre itself expresses this conviction: truth is sought in dialogue and friendship, not in self-sufficient solitude. The teacher is necessary, but within a community of faith that precedes and sustains him.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • هل العالم حقيقي؟

    The creature is rooted in God through Sophia; the visible borders the invisible

    خلقٌ صالح وحقيقييقوله صراحةً

    Florensky, theologian and scientist at once, does not doubt the reality of the created world, but thinks of it as open from above. In The Pillar and Ground of the Truth he devotes one letter to the creature and another to Sophia, which he defines as the great root of all creation, through which the creature enters Trinitarian life and receives eternal life. The world is good because it is rooted in God. In Iconostasis he describes the boundary between the visible and the invisible world, which dreams, art and liturgy allow one to cross, and the icon as its witness. In Imaginaries in Geometry he went so far as to propose, on the basis of relativity, a model of the cosmos in which the visible world borders a space of another nature.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • ما الحب؟

    Love is consubstantiality: it takes in order to give and makes two one unconfused

    محبة الله والقريبيقوله صراحةً

    In The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, love is the key to Trinitarian life and therefore to truth itself: God is love because each divine person gives itself to the others. Florensky describes it with paradoxical formulas: love eternally takes away in order eternally to give, eternally puts to death in order eternally to give life. In the letter on friendship and the letter on jealousy he studies it in its most concrete human form, friendship between two persons, which the early Church blessed with a rite of brother-making of its own, and which makes two one without confusing them, in the image of the Trinity's consubstantiality. Jealousy, in this sense, can be the face of love defending its unique object. Love of neighbour in general is first learned in love for one concrete friend.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • هل نحن أحرار أم أن كل شيء مقدَّر؟

    Freedom and grace form an antinomy that reason does not solve but accepts

    إرادة حرة حقيقيةيُستنتج من تعاليمه

    Florensky does not treat freedom as an isolated problem, but as one of the cases of antinomy he considers proper to all religious truth. In the letter on contradiction in The Pillar and Ground of the Truth he holds that truth, seen from finite reason, appears as a pair of opposed affirmations that must be held together: providence that disposes all things and freedom that responds, grace that saves and human effort. In the letter on gehenna he applies the same scheme: God's love wills the salvation of all, but the creature's freedom can refuse it, and both theses are true. Human freedom is therefore real, and the human being answers for his acts, though his relation to providence cannot be reduced to a formula.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • لماذا نتأمّل أو نصلّي؟

    Worship is the root of culture and the place where reality is sanctified

    الطقس وتهذيب الذاتيقوله صراحةً

    Florensky, a priest as well as a scientist, thought of prayer above all from liturgical worship. In the lectures gathered as The Philosophy of Cult he maintains that worship is the centre from which all culture springs, as the word itself indicates, and that in it material reality, water, bread, oil, word and gesture, is sanctified and opened to the divine. In Church Ritual as a Synthesis of the Arts and in Iconostasis he describes the liturgy as a total work of art involving architecture, candlelight, incense smoke, chant and the icon, and the icon as a window onto the invisible world. His interest in the divine name, in the context of the name-glorifying controversy, shows that personal prayer is not separated from rite.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • هل يستطيع العقل أن يعرف الحقيقة القصوى؟

    Religious truth is antinomic: reason touches it only as contradiction

    الحقيقة القصوى وراء العقليقوله صراحةً

    Florensky was a mathematician by training and never despised reason: he studied Cantor's set theory, wrote on the infinite and worked as an engineer. Precisely for that reason he knew its limits. In The Pillar and Ground of the Truth he holds that reason, governed by the law of identity, cannot by itself find a truth that proves itself: it leads to scepticism. And when it approaches the mysteries of faith, it meets them as antinomies, pairs of contradictory affirmations equally true, such as God's unity and trinity or freedom and grace. The letter on contradiction makes antinomy the seal of religious truth. Knowledge of the ultimate is possible only through living religious experience, in which reason is transfigured without being abolished.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين
  • الانسحاب من العالم أم تغييره؟

    A priest in a cassock at the technical office: serving through science without leaving faith

    التأمّل في الفعليُستنتج من تعاليمه

    Florensky embodied a singular way of living in the world. After the revolution, when the Theological Academy closed, he neither emigrated nor withdrew: he worked on the commission for the protection of the monuments of the Lavra of Saint Sergius and later on the country's electrification plan, where he attended meetings in cassock and pectoral cross. He published studies on dielectrics and wrote articles for the technical encyclopaedia. Deported to Solovki, he researched the extraction of iodine and agar from seaweed. In his letters to his children from the camp he teaches them to observe nature attentively and to work well, as a form of service. Science, art and liturgy were for him expressions of one and the same vision of the world, and none required renouncing the others.

    قارن هذا السؤال مع معلّمين آخرين

حكايات وروايات

حكايات وروايات

موثّقmarzo de 1906

The cry of blood

In March 1906 Russia was still living through the repression that followed the 1905 revolution: courts martial, hangings, summary shootings. Florensky, then a twenty-four-year-old student at the Theological Academy of Sergiev Posad, mounted the pulpit of the Academy church and preached a sermon calling on the people not to follow the path of bloodshed and fratricide and denouncing the death penalty as a godless deed. The text, under the title 'The Cry of Blood', was printed without passing the ecclesiastical censor. The authorities treated it as an illegal political act: the student was prosecuted and sentenced to a prison term that only his superiors' intercession spared him. Thirty-one years later the same man would fall under another machine of death, that of the NKVD.

أصل الرواية: The sermon and the prosecution are recorded in his biographies; the detail of the sentence imposed and its remission comes from the Ekzeget.ru biography. That the sermon responded specifically to the execution of Lieutenant Pyotr Schmidt (March 1906) is held by several biographers but has not been verified here.

المصدر: «Павел Флоренский, священник». Ekzeget.ru (biografía: el sermón de 1906, la detención de 1933, las Solovkí).

تقليد شفهي1919–1946

The head of St Sergius

In April 1919 the Soviet authorities ordered the public opening of the relics of St Sergius of Radonezh at the Trinity Lavra, as part of the campaign against 'false relics'. According to a Florensky family tradition, shortly before, the members of the Commission for the Protection of the Monuments of the Lavra — Florensky, Count Yury Olsufyev and probably Vladimir Komarovsky, Sergei Mansurov and Mikhail Shik — entered the Trinity cathedral by night, prayed at the tomb, opened the shrine and replaced the saint's head with that of a Prince Trubetskoy buried in the Lavra. St Sergius's head was supposedly hidden in the sacristy and, after Florensky's arrest, moved secretly from house to house, until at Easter 1946, when the Lavra reopened, it returned to its place. All were said to have sworn silence. A note survives, in Olsufyev's hand and undated, with 'questions of the priest P. Florensky concerning the relics of St Sergius'.

أصل الرواية: It comes from late memories transmitted in the Florensky family and by Ekaterina Vasilchikova, Olsufyev's niece, and by Archbishop Sergei (Golubtsov); it was published in the 1990s. The opening of the relics on 11 April 1919 is documented; the substitution of the head has no independent documentary confirmation. A later legend even attributes Florensky's death sentence to his refusal to reveal the hiding place, without any evidence.

المصدر: «Флоренский, Павел Александрович». Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, «Столп», caso Beilis, arresto y fusilamiento, publicaciones).

موثّق1928

Staying

In 1928 Florensky was arrested and exiled to Nizhny Novgorod, where he worked at the radio laboratory. Ekaterina Peshkova, Maxim Gorky's first wife and head of the Political Red Cross, the last organisation able to intercede for prisoners, obtained permission for him to return to Moscow and the offer of emigration to Prague, as Berdyaev, Bulgakov and so many others had earlier left, expelled. Florensky declined and decided to stay in the Soviet Union, with his family, his scientific work and his cassock. Five years later, in February 1933, he was arrested again; this time there would be no way out.

أصل الرواية: Recorded in the Russian Wikipedia biography and in A. Pyman's biography, on the basis of the Political Red Cross and family documentation.

المصدر: «Флоренский, Павел Александрович». Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, «Столп», caso Beilis, arresto y fusilamiento, publicaciones).

موثّق1934–1937

Chemistry lessons from Solovki

From the Solovki islands, where he worked at the camp's iodine factory, Florensky wrote his family numbered, censored letters in which he almost never complained. What he did was teach. He wrote to each child according to age and interests: to one about mineralogy and crystals, to another about music, to another about poetry and painting. In one of them he proposes a home experiment to a child: boil a little starch in water, add a drop of tincture of iodine and watch the paste turn blue; heat it and watch it lose its colour; let it cool and watch the blue return. He described the birds, the seaweed, the frozen lakes, the light of the Arctic summer, and in February 1937, writing about the centenary of Pushkin's death, he left one of his most quoted sentences: that giving to the world is possible only at the price of suffering and persecution.

أصل الرواية: The letters themselves, published in full in vol. 4 of his Works (Mysl, 1998).

المصدر: Florenski, P. A. Письма с Соловков [Cartas desde las Solovkí], en Сочинения в 4 томах, t. 4: Письма с Дальнего Востока и Соловков, ed. igumeno Andronik (Trubachov) et al. Moscú: Mysl, 1998, pp. 139–781. Texto en Azbuka.

موثّق1937–1989

An invented date of death

For years Florensky's family did not know what had become of him. The letters stopped arriving in the summer of 1937. When, after the war, Anna Mikhailovna and the children asked for information, the authorities told them he had died on 15 December 1943, without saying where or of what. It was a lie, as in so many other cases of the Great Terror, in which deaths 'from illness' were invented at later dates to conceal the mass executions of 1937–1938. The truth came to light only with the opening of the security-service archives: on 25 November 1937 a special NKVD troika of the Leningrad region had sentenced him to death, and on 8 December he was shot with other prisoners transferred from Solovki. Where his grave lies is not known for certain.

أصل الرواية: The sentence, the date of execution and the falsity of the date given to the family are recorded in the case-file documents published after perestroika; the research on the burial site is that of Anatoly Razumov (Leningradsky martirolog).

المصدر: Razumov, Anatoli Ya. (entrevista). «Соловецкие этапы. Где расстрелян священник Павел Флоренский?». Radio Grad Petrov, 2017 (archivada en Internet Archive). Razumov es el compilador del «Ленинградский мартиролог» de la Biblioteca Nacional de Rusia.

التعاليم

التعاليم

المفاهيم التي ينتظم بها فكره، مشروحة في سياقها.

Antinomyantinomia
For Florensky religious truth is antinomic: it can be stated only through pairs of contradictory propositions, equally true, which discursive reason cannot reconcile. The Trinity is one God and three persons; Christ is fully God and fully man; man is free and everything depends on grace. This is not a flaw in dogma but the sign that truth comes from another plane: 'truth is antinomy', he writes in The Pillar and Ground of the Truth. Reason, which demands identity and non-contradiction, is compelled to a 'feat of faith' that raises it without destroying it. Florensky grounds this thesis in his mathematical training — the antinomies of set theory, imaginaries, discontinuity — and in a reading of Kant's antinomies as revelation of the structure of being. The idea, much debated, influenced Bulgakov and Losev.

Sixth letter ('Contradiction') of The Pillar and Ground of the Truth; antecedents in The Cosmological Antinomies of Kant (1909).

المصدر: Florenski, P. A. Столп и утверждение истины. Опыт православной феодицеи в двенадцати письмах [La columna y el fundamento de la verdad]. Moscú: Put, 1914. Texto en Azbuka.

Sophia and sophiologysofia
In the tenth letter of The Pillar and Ground of the Truth Florensky takes up Solovyov's doctrine of divine Wisdom and reformulates it from Russian liturgy, iconography and piety. Sophia is 'the Great Root of the whole of creation', the ideal creature in God, through which the created participates in the Trinitarian life; she is at once the Guardian Angel of creation, the Church as the body of Christ, the Virgin Mary and virginity as the purity of the person. Florensky draws on the icons and churches of Holy Wisdom in Novgorod and Kiev and on the liturgical offices to show that Russian religious consciousness has always venerated Sophia as something distinct from Christ the Logos. His sophiology, later developed by Bulgakov, was criticised by theologians such as Florovsky and Lossky for blurring the boundary between God and creation; Berdyaev judged it aestheticising.

Heir to Solovyov; in critical dialogue with Böhme's sophiology, which Berdyaev compared with the Russian one in 1930.

المصدر: Florenski, P. A. Столп и утверждение истины. Опыт православной феодицеи в двенадцати письмах [La columna y el fundamento de la verdad]. Moscú: Put, 1914. Texto en Azbuka.

Reverse perspectiveperspectiva-invertida
In 'Reverse Perspective' (1919) Florensky analyses a feature of icons that academic criticism regarded as clumsiness: lines that should converge towards the background diverge, objects are seen from several points at once, the side faces of buildings open out towards the viewer. He holds that this is not a mistake but another conception of space. Renaissance linear perspective, codified as though the world were seen from a single motionless eye, expresses the individualism and naturalism of modernity and turns the picture into theatrical illusion; that of the icon organises space from the spiritual world towards the one who looks, and makes the icon a presence rather than a deceptive window. Florensky examines the history of art — Greek stage design, Giotto, Dürer, Leonardo — to show that epochs oscillate between the two types of representation according to their 'feeling for life'. The essay, published in 1967 in Tartu, became a classic text of art theory and semiotics.

Later developed in the VKhUTEMAS course on spatiality (1924–1925).

المصدر: «Флоренский, Павел Александрович». Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, «Столп», caso Beilis, arresto y fusilamiento, publicaciones).

The icon and the iconostasisicono
Iconostasis (1922) starts from a phenomenology of dreams: in dreams the soul passes from the visible to the invisible world and returns with images that are symbols of it. True art does the same: the icon is the image of a spiritual vision fixed in matter, a window through which one sees — or from which looks out — heavenly reality. The iconostasis, the wall of icons separating the altar from the nave, is not an obstacle but the visible boundary between the two worlds, 'formed by the saints themselves', who bear witness to what lies on the other side. Florensky defends the traditional technique of the icon — the gold ground, the light that builds figures in layers, egg tempera — as the expression of a metaphysics of light, against the oil painting, carnality and perspective of post-Tridentine Western art. Hence his famous 'proof' of God's existence: 'There is Rublev's Trinity; therefore there is God'.

Written in 1922, at the height of the Soviet campaign against the Church; published in 1972.

المصدر: Florenski, P. A. Иконостас [El iconostasio] (1922). Богословские труды, n.º 9 (1972), pp. 83–148. Texto en Azbuka.

Imaginaries and the space beyondimaginarios
In Imaginaries in Geometry (1922) Florensky proposes interpreting imaginary numbers not as abstractions but as the 'reverse side' of a geometric surface: imaginary points would lie on the other side of the plane. He applies the idea to the theory of relativity: when a body exceeds the speed of light its magnitudes become imaginary, and a space of another nature, the invisible world, begins. Drawing on the cosmology of Dante's Paradiso — which the traveller crosses without turning round to emerge 'on the other side' — he defends a geocentric cosmology and places the boundary between Earth and Heaven between the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. The little book, admired for its daring and its design (the cover is by Favorsky), was attacked by the Soviet press as obscurantism and is still debated by historians of science, who read it as metaphysical speculation rather than physics.

It joins his mathematical training with his theology of the icon and of the boundary between worlds.

المصدر: «Флоренский, Павел Александрович». Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, «Столп», caso Beilis, arresto y fusilamiento, publicaciones).

The name and the magic of the wordnombre
In the essays of At the Watersheds of Thought — 'The Magic of the Word', 'The Structure of the Word', 'Onomatodoxy as a Philosophical Premise', 'Names' — Florensky develops a realist philosophy of language: the word is not a conventional sign but the energy of the reality named, a bridge between subject and object in which both meet. That is why he defended the Athonite monks who held that 'the Name of God is God himself' (imyaslavie), condemned by the Synod in 1913, and why he wrote an essay on proper names as spiritual forms or 'types' of the person. His disciple Alexei Losev carried this line on in The Philosophy of the Name (1927).

Part of his 'concrete metaphysics' of the 1920s.

المصدر: «Флоренский, Павел Александрович». Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, «Столп», caso Beilis, arresto y fusilamiento, publicaciones).

مقاطع الفيديو

مقاطع الفيديو

تسجيلات ومقابلات وأفلام وثائقية. تُشغَّل مقاطع الفيديو من YouTube؛ ولا تُستضاف هنا.

  • «Почаще смотрите на звёзды»

    فيلم وثائقي· RU

    ТК ТОНУС

  • Жизнь замечательных семей. Флоренский

    فيلم وثائقي· RU

    Радость мояالقناة الرسمية

  • о. Павел Флоренский

    فيلم وثائقي· RU

    Игорь Штернбергالقناة الرسمية

  • Павел Флоренский. От геометрии мнимостей к топологии духа (часть 1)

    محاضرة· RU· 2018

    Калининградская областная научная библиотекаالقناة الرسمية

  • Обратная перспектива в эстетике и космологии отца Павла Флоренского. Лекция Оксаны Седых

    محاضرة· RU· 2020

    nffedorov

  • Reverse Perspective, the Politics of Space, and Contemporary Art Practice

    محاضرة· EN

    IWMVienna (Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen)القناة الرسمية

  • Philosophy of Love in the Context of Russian Philosophy. V. Solovyov and P. Florensky

    محاضرة· EN

    Studium Europy Wschodniej (Universidad de Varsovia)القناة الرسمية

  • Ciclo de Charlas — Pavel Florenski: filósofo, historiador del arte, matemático y sacerdote ruso

    محاضرة· ES

    cursosoficialesderusoالقناة الرسمية

  • Vita e pensiero di Pavel Florenskij — Prof.ssa A. Marcuccini

    محاضرة· IT

    Filippo Tassi

  • Nulla va perduto. L'esperienza di Pavel Florenskij

    محاضرة· IT· 2013

    Filosofia Tor Vergataالقناة الرسمية

  • Il respiro della vita. Pavel A. Florenskij testimone della verità (con Massimo Cacciari)

    محاضرة· IT

    icaroplay

  • La testimonianza di Pavel Florenskij

    فيلم وثائقي· IT

    12Porteالقناة الرسمية

  • Benedetto XVI cita Florenskij: «Quando avrete un peso nell'animo, guardate le stelle…»

    تسجيل من طرف ثالث· IT

    raffaellablogpapa1

المعرض

المعرض

صور بترخيص متحقَّق منه. كل منها تحتفظ بمؤلّفها ونسبتها.

العلاقات

العلاقات

تأثيرات وتلمذة وتقارب في الأفكار. تُميَّز العلاقة الموثّقة عن التشابه المستخلَص بالتحليل.

  • تأثّر بـ

    Vladimir Solovyov

    In his university years he was drawn to Solovyov's teaching, and his sophiology, in the tenth letter of The Pillar and Ground of the Truth, starts from Solovyov's, which he corrects with Russian liturgy and iconography. He belongs to the generation that made Solovyov its starting point.

    علاقة موثّقة

  • اختلف مع

    Nikolai Berdyaev

    Berdyaev reviewed The Pillar and Ground of the Truth harshly in 'Stylised Orthodoxy' (1914) and argued against 'Around Khomyakov' (1916); in Self-Knowledge he would call him 'alien and hostile', a 'refined reactionary' indifferent to ethics. For him Florensky represented the aesthetic and magical Orthodoxy that freedom had to overcome.

    علاقة موثّقة

  • تأثّر بـ

    Seraphim of Sarov

    In The Pillar and Ground of the Truth he quotes, in the fourth letter, 'The Light of Truth', Seraphim's conversation with Motovilov on the acquisition of the Holy Spirit, and in the tenth, 'Sophia', he recalls that the saint called the icon of Tenderness, the only one in his cell, 'Joy of all joys'.

    علاقة موثّقة

  • تأثّر بـ

    Plato

    He devoted to Plato his lectures 'The Universal Human Roots of Idealism' (1909) and 'The Meaning of Idealism' (1914), in which he interprets the doctrine of ideas as the philosophical elaboration of a universal religious and magical experience. In To My Children he describes his youthful search for Goethe's 'primal phenomenon' in an ontological density 'after Plato'.

    علاقة موثّقة

  • معاصر لـ

    Leo Tolstoy

    In To My Children he recalls that as an adolescent he read Tolstoy's philosophical writings and found them 'mostly tedious', though he was interested in Carpenter's article on science translated by Tolstoy; Merezhkovsky's study of Tolstoy and Dostoevsky marked him more.

    علاقة موثّقة

  • أفكار قريبة من

    Fyodor Dostoevsky

    No detailed influence is recorded, but Florensky draws on Dostoevsky in Iconostasis — Stavrogin's 'mask' as a face petrified by passion — and shares with him the vision of the elder and of Russian holiness as the centre of spiritual life.

    تشابه مستخلَص بالتحليل

  • أفكار قريبة من

    Jakob Böhme

    Berdyaev, in 'The Doctrine of Sophia and the Androgyne in J. Böhme and the Russian Sophiological Currents' (1930), compared Böhme's Sophia with that of Russian sophiology, from Solovyov to Florensky and Bulgakov, and noted their differences: in Böhme Sophia is virginity and freedom; in the Russians, a more cosmic and Platonic idea.

    علاقة موثّقة

المصادر

المصادر

المراجع والفهارس التي رُوجعت لهذه الصفحة.

  1. Wikidata, Q336769: Pavel Florensky (1882–1937). P31=Q5; 47 enlaces entre wikis.
  2. «Флоренский, Павел Александрович». Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, «Столп», caso Beilis, arresto y fusilamiento, publicaciones).
  3. Pyman, Avril. Pavel Florensky: A Quiet Genius. The Tragic and Extraordinary Life of Russia's Unknown da Vinci. Nueva York y Londres: Continuum, 2010.
  4. Florenski, P. A. Столп и утверждение истины. Опыт православной феодицеи в двенадцати письмах [La columna y el fundamento de la verdad]. Moscú: Put, 1914. Texto en Azbuka.
  5. Florenski, P. A. Иконостас [El iconostasio] (1922). Богословские труды, n.º 9 (1972), pp. 83–148. Texto en Azbuka.
  6. Florenski, P. A. Письма с Соловков [Cartas desde las Solovkí], en Сочинения в 4 томах, t. 4: Письма с Дальнего Востока и Соловков, ed. igumeno Andronik (Trubachov) et al. Moscú: Mysl, 1998, pp. 139–781. Texto en Azbuka.
  7. Florenski, P. A. Детям моим. Воспоминания прошлых дней [A mis hijos. Recuerdos de días pasados] (1916–1926). Moscú: Moskovski rabochi, 1992. Texto en Azbuka.
  8. Open Library, autor OL54367A: Pavel Florensky (1882–1937), obras y ediciones.
  9. Berdiáyev, N. A. «Стилизованное православие (о. Павел Флоренский)». Русская мысль, 1914, n.º 1. Texto en la Biblioteca «Vejí».
  10. Razumov, Anatoli Ya. (entrevista). «Соловецкие этапы. Где расстрелян священник Павел Флоренский?». Radio Grad Petrov, 2017 (archivada en Internet Archive). Razumov es el compilador del «Ленинградский мартиролог» de la Biblioteca Nacional de Rusia.
  11. «Павел Флоренский, священник». Ekzeget.ru (biografía: el sermón de 1906, la detención de 1933, las Solovkí).
  12. Berdiáyev, N. A. «Из этюдов о Я. Беме. Этюд II: Учение о Софии и андрогине Я. Беме и русские софиологические течения». Путь, 1930, n.º 21, pp. 34–62.
  13. «Pavel Florensky». Wikipedia en inglés (traslado desde las Solovkí y ejecución, con referencias a A. Maccioni, eSamizdat, 2007).
صاحب الحقوق
Florenski murió en 1937: sus obras publicadas en vida son de dominio público en EE. UU. (anteriores a 1930), en la UE (desde 2008) y en España (desde 2018). Las obras póstumas publicadas desde 1967 pueden estar protegidas en EE. UU.; en Rusia, por su rehabilitación póstuma, el plazo se cuenta desde 1958. Las traducciones pertenecen a sus traductores y editoriales.

في انتظار التأكيد

ما لم تتمكّن هذه الصفحة من حسمه بعد. نفضّل أن نقول ذلك على أن نملأ الفراغ.

  • Edición española de «Los imaginarios en geometría» y de «Los nombres»: no localizadas.
  • Confirmar la vinculación del sermón «El clamor de la sangre» (marzo de 1906) con la ejecución del teniente Piotr Schmidt, y la pena exacta impuesta.
  • Confirmar fechas y revistas de «El sentido del idealismo» (1914), «Razón y dialéctica» (1914), «Signos celestes» y «La acción del templo» (en «Makovets», 1922).
  • Registrar uno por uno sus artículos de la «Enciclopedia técnica» (unos 150), sus escritos teológicos publicados en «Bogoslovskie trudy» (1972–2007) y sus poemas; hoy figuran agrupados o sólo los principales.
  • Lugar de la ejecución y de la fosa: no establecido (Levashovo, polígono de Rzhevka/Koirangakangas o una fosa del campo de Lodéinoye Pole, según las hipótesis de A. Razumov y A. Maccioni).
  • Contenido exacto de «Early Religious Writings, 1903–1909» (Eerdmans, 2017): no se ha asignado a obras concretas.
  • Verificar en el texto de su «Testamento» la frase sobre mirar las estrellas que citó Benedicto XVI (no se ha podido cotejar).
  • Duración y año de la mayoría de los vídeos: oEmbed no los proporciona.

بُحث بتاريخ 2026-10-25