Vai al contenuto
The ConsciousLibrary

Induismo · Advaita Vedanta · Tradizione vedica

Uddalaka Aruni

उद्दालक आरुणि

Storicità dibattuta

Saggio vedico dei Kuru-Pañcāla, della stirpe dei Gautama, che le Upaniṣad presentano come maestro del figlio Śvetaketu e di Yājñavalkya. Nel sesto libro della Chāndogya insegna con esperimenti — l'argilla, il seme del baniano, il sale disciolto nell'acqua — che tutto procede dall'essere, «uno senza secondo», e lo riassume nel ritornello «tat tvam asi». Non scrisse nulla; la sua figura, di storicità discussa, proviene dallo Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa e dalle Upaniṣad più antiche, risalenti all'incirca al VII–VI secolo a.C.

opere
9opere
edizioni
24edizioni
citazioni
7citazioni
video
12video
immagini
4immagini
Manuscrito de la Chāndogya Upaniṣad (1849)

Manuscrito de la Chāndogya Upaniṣad (1849) · CC BY-SA 4.0

Con le sue parole

«In the beginning, my dear, this was being alone, one only, without a second.»

Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.2.1 (traducción propia)

La sua idea centrale

Tat tvam asi ("you are that"): The refrain that closes nine of Uddālaka's lessons to Śvetaketu in the Chāndogya (6.8.7–6.16.3): that subtle essence (aṇiman) is what all this has as its self; that is the real; that is the ātman; tat tvam asi.

Biografia

5 min di lettura

Traduzione assistita dall'originale spagnolo, in attesa di revisione da parte di un traduttore madrelingua.

Un maestro negli elenchi dei maestri

Uddālaka Āruṇi non ha lasciato alcuno scritto. È un nome che ricorre di continuo nella prosa vedica tarda — lo Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa, la Bṛhadāraṇyaka e la Chāndogya Upaniṣad, la Kauṣītaki, il Jaiminīya Upaniṣad Brāhmaṇa — come autorità rituale, come interlocutore nei dibattiti e, soprattutto, come maestro. I testi lo chiamano anche Gautama, dal nome della sua stirpe, e gli assegnano un padre, Aruṇa Aupaveśi, e un figlio, Śvetaketu Āruṇeya; a partire da queste menzioni Michael Witzel ha ricostruito un albero di quattro generazioni. Era un brahmano dei Kuru-Pañcāla, il cuore del mondo vedico nella pianura del Gange occidentale, e gli elenchi dei maestri della Bṛhadāraṇyaka ne fanno il maestro di Yājñavalkya: «Yājñavalkya, da Uddālaka; Uddālaka, da Aruṇa».

Il viaggiatore del nord

Lo Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa conserva un episodio che lo ritrae come sacerdote itinerante. Uddālaka percorreva il paese del nord come officiante e portava con sé una moneta d'oro, perché anticamente, dice il testo, chi viaggiava così offriva un premio per sfidare gli altri a una disputa. I brahmani del nord, temendo che quel brahmano dei Kuru-Pañcāla sottraesse loro il terreno, mandarono Svaidāyana Śaunaka. Costui gli pose una serie di domande sul senso nascosto delle offerte di luna nuova e di luna piena; Uddālaka gli consegnò la moneta, ne riconobbe il sapere e tornò poi con della legna in mano — il gesto di chi chiede di diventare discepolo — perché gliele spiegasse. In un altro passo è lui a rispondere, una per una, alle domande di Śauceya Prācīnayogya sull'agnihotra.

Padre e maestro

L'insegnamento che lo ha reso celebre è quello del sesto libro della Chāndogya. Suo figlio Śvetaketu, mandato a studiare a dodici anni, torna a ventiquattro, racconta il testo, «borioso, presuntuoso, convinto di essere istruito». Il padre gli chiede se conosca l'insegnamento grazie al quale si ode il non udito, si pensa il non pensato e si conosce il non conosciuto. Di fronte alla sua ignoranza, glielo offre: come per mezzo di una sola zolla d'argilla si conosce tutto ciò che è fatto d'argilla — e i vasi non sono altro che «una questione di parole, una modificazione, un nome» —, così per mezzo dell'essere (sat) si conosce tutto ciò che esiste. «In principio, mio caro, questo era l'essere soltanto, uno senza secondo». Da esso sorgono il calore, l'acqua e il cibo, che si combinano in tutte le cose.

Nove lezioni e un ritornello

Uddālaka insegna con esperimenti. Fa digiunare il figlio per quindici giorni, bevendo soltanto acqua, e constata che non riesce a recitare i Veda; quando torna a mangiare, la memoria ritorna come una brace ravvivata con la paglia. Seguono nove lezioni: il miele che riunisce il nettare di molti alberi senza che ogni goccia sappia da quale albero proviene, i fiumi che si perdono nel mare, l'albero che vive finché la vita lo impregna, il seme del baniano che, spaccato, non mostra nulla e da cui tuttavia nasce il grande albero, il sale disciolto nell'acqua, che non si vede e si gusta ovunque, l'uomo bendato che ritrova la strada per il Gandhāra perché qualcuno gliela indica. Ogni lezione si chiude con lo stesso ritornello: quell'essenza sottile è ciò che tutto questo ha per essere; quello è il reale; quello è l'ātman; tat tvam asi, Śvetaketu.

Che cosa significa «tat tvam asi»

La tradizione advaita, a partire da Śaṅkara, ha letto la frase come un'identità — «tu sei quello»: l'ātman individuale è il brahman — e l'ha annoverata tra i quattro «grandi detti» delle Upaniṣad. Joel Brereton ha proposto nel 1986 un'altra lettura, attenta alla grammatica e al contesto: il pronome neutro rimanda all'essenza sottile di cui si è appena parlato, e la frase significherebbe qualcosa come «così sei tu». Patrick Olivelle traduce di conseguenza «e così sei tu, Śvetaketu». Le due letture concordano sull'essenziale — il figlio è fatto della stessa realtà invisibile di cui è fatto tutto il resto —, ma divergono sul punto se il testo formuli un'identità metafisica o una spiegazione della natura della persona.

Un brahmano disposto a imparare

I testi insistono su un tratto del suo carattere: Uddālaka non teme di tornare allievo. Alla corte di Janaka interroga Yājñavalkya sul «filo» che unisce i mondi e sul «reggitore interiore», ricorda ciò che apprese presso Patañcala Kāpya nel paese dei Madra e, dopo la risposta, tace. Quando il re Pravāhaṇa Jaivali umilia Śvetaketu con cinque domande sul destino dopo la morte, il padre si reca a corte, chiede di essere istruito e riceve la dottrina dei cinque fuochi, che il re dichiara non essere mai giunta prima a un brahmano. Ad altri brahmani che lo interrogano sull'ātman universale ammette che non saprà rispondere del tutto e li conduce dal re Aśvapati Kaikeya. Brian Black ha studiato queste scene, in cui il sapere passa dai re ai sacerdoti.

Ciò che si sa e ciò che non si sa

Non ci sono date: la storicità di Uddālaka è discussa come quella dell'intera generazione delle prime Upaniṣad, che Olivelle colloca intorno al VII e al VI secolo a.C. e Witzel nell'epoca vedica tarda, prima del Buddha. Ben-Ami Scharfstein lo annovera tra i primi filosofi della storia, e il marxista Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya vide in lui il primo «scienziato della natura», per il suo metodo di osservazione e di esperimento. La Kaṭha Upaniṣad menziona un Auddālaki Āruṇi, padre di Naciketas, che Śaṅkara identificò con lui; Max Müller osservò che la forma del nome solleva dubbi.

L'Āruṇi dell'epica

Il Mahābhārata gli ha attribuito una giovinezza leggendaria. Āruṇi di Pañcāla, discepolo del saggio Āyoda Dhaumya, fu mandato a tappare una breccia nell'argine di un campo; non riuscendoci, vi si distese e fermò l'acqua con il proprio corpo. Quando il maestro lo chiamò, si alzò rompendo l'argine, e Dhaumya gli diede il nome di Uddālaka, «colui che si è levato dall'argine». La stessa epica fa di sua figlia Sujātā la madre di Aṣṭāvakra e attribuisce a Śvetaketu l'istituzione della fedeltà coniugale. Un'Upaniṣad tarda della rinuncia porta il suo nome, l'Āruṇi Upaniṣad, e Madhva citava una «Āruṇi-śruti» oggi perduta. Il ritornello della Chāndogya, intanto, è diventato una delle frasi più ripetute della spiritualità indiana.

Fonti: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1. · Olivelle, Patrick (trad.). Upaniṣads. Oxford World's Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 (traducción «And that's how you are, Śvetaketu» de Chāndogya 6.8.7 y ss.). · Müller, F. Max (trad.). The Upanishads, Part I (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879 (Khândogya y Kaushîtaki-brâhmaṇa-upanishad); y Part II (SBE 15), 1884, nota a Kaṭha 1.11. · Eggeling, Julius (trad.). The Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa, Part V (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 44). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900. XI.4.1 (Uddālaka Āruṇi y Svaidāyana) y XI.5.3 (Śauceya Prācīnayogya y Uddālaka Āruṇi sobre el agnihotra). · Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad. Science and Society in Ancient India. Calcuta: Research India Publications, 1977.

Cronologia

La vita, anno per anno

Ogni punto è un evento documentato. Fai clic per leggerlo, con la sua fonte e il suo grado di certezza.

  1. VIII secolo a.C. – 600 a.C.

    Ritual authority of the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa

    His opinions and debates appear in the later books of the Śatapatha (XI.4.1, XI.5.3) and in the Jaiminīya Upaniṣad Brāhmaṇa. The range is an estimate of the period of the texts.

    Probabile

  2. VII secolo a.C.

    Svaidāyana's challenge

    Travelling in the north as an officiant, he loses a disputation to Svaidāyana Śaunaka and returns with firewood in hand to be instructed (Śatapatha XI.4.1).

    Tradizione

  3. VII secolo a.C.

    The teaching to Śvetaketu

    Chāndogya 6: being, one without a second, the experiments and the refrain "tat tvam asi".

    Tradizione

  4. VII secolo a.C.

    Pupil of King Pravāhaṇa Jaivali

    After his son's humiliation at the Pañcāla assembly, he receives from the king the doctrine of the five fires (Chāndogya 5.3–10; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 6.2).

    Tradizione

  5. VII secolo a.C.

    He questions Yājñavalkya

    He asks about the "thread" and the "inner controller" and falls silent after the answer (Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7).

    Tradizione

  6. II secolo a.C. – 400

    The Āruṇi of the Mahābhārata

    The epic, fixed between the third century BCE and the fourth century CE, tells the episode of the dyke and how his teacher Dhaumya gave him the name Uddālaka.

    Probabile

  7. 1862

    First English translation of the Chāndogya

    Rājendralāla Mitra publishes the Chāndogya with extracts from Śaṅkara's commentary in the Bibliotheca Indica.

    Documentato

  8. 1879

    The Chāndogya in the Sacred Books of the East

    Max Müller opens the series with the Chāndogya and popularizes the rendering "Thou art that".

    Documentato

  9. 1986

    Brereton rereads "tat tvam asi"

    Joel Brereton proposes reading the refrain in its grammatical context as "that's how you are", a reading Olivelle adopts.

    Documentato

Opere

Opere essenziali

Le opere senza le quali non si comprende la sua eredità.

The teaching to Śvetaketu (Chāndogya Upaniṣad, book VI) — Uddalaka Aruni

Attribuzione tradizionale · VII secolo a.C.

The teaching to Śvetaketu (Chāndogya Upaniṣad, book VI)

छान्दोग्योपनिषद् षष्ठोऽध्यायः (Chāndogya Upaniṣad VI)

Sixteen prose sections. Śvetaketu returns conceited after twelve years of study, and his father teaches him what he did not learn: how, by knowing one thing, everything is known. He sets out the origin of the world from being (sat), "one without a second", which produces heat, water and food; the threefold composition of all things; the experiment of fasting; and nine illustrations — honey, rivers, the tree, the fig seed, salt in water, the man from Gandhāra, the dying man, the thief put to the ordeal of the axe — ending with the refrain "tat tvam asi, Śvetaketu". It is one of the founding texts of Vedānta.

9 edizioni

Raccolta posteriore · VII secolo a.C.

Chāndogya Upaniṣad (passages of Uddālaka Āruṇi)

छान्दोग्योपनिषद् (Chāndogya Upaniṣad)

Together with the Bṛhadāraṇyaka, the oldest of the Upaniṣads. Its first books interpret the chants (sāman) and the syllable Om; the following ones contain teachings on the ātman and brahman attributed to various masters. In book 5 Uddālaka receives from King Pravāhaṇa the doctrine of the five fires and the two paths of the dead, and accompanies other brahmins to Aśvapati Kaikeya to learn the universal ātman (vaiśvānara). Book 6 is his teaching to Śvetaketu.

6 edizioni

Citazioni

Citazioni localizzate in un'opera precisa. Ciascuna porta con sé la sua provenienza e il suo grado di affidabilità.

In the beginning, my dear, this was being alone, one only, without a second.

सदेव सोम्येदमग्र आसीदेकमेवाद्वितीयम् ।

VerificataChāndogya Upaniṣad 6.2.1 (traducción propia)

1 / 7

Ultime parole

Non esistono testimonianze verificabili delle sue ultime parole.

There is no account of his death or last words in the Vedic texts, the epic or the Purāṇas. The only words of his that survive are the teachings and dialogues attributed to him by the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa and the Upaniṣads.

Fonte: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Chiedi

Ciò a cui risponde la sua opera

Dodici grandi domande dell'umanità e ciò che i suoi testi permettono di rispondere, con riferimenti. Non gli mettiamo mai parole in bocca.

  • Che cos'è l'Assoluto? Dio esiste?

    In the beginning there was only being, one without a second

    Un Assoluto impersonaleLo dice espressamente

    In the sixth book of the Chāndogya Upaniṣad, Uddālaka Āruṇi teaches his son Śvetaketu that in the beginning there was only being (sat), one without a second, and rejects those who held that being was born from non-being. From that principle come heat, water and food, and from their mixture all things. He does not describe a god who judges or loves: he describes a single substance, so subtle that it is not perceived, which is the ātman of all that exists. His examples —the clay of which all pots are made, the dissolved salt that is unseen yet present in every sip, the invisible seed from which the fig tree grows— aim to make the disciple recognise that principle in things and in himself.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Chi sono io? Esiste un vero sé?

    The subtle essence of all is the ātman, «and that's how you are»

    Il Sé è l'AssolutoLo dice espressamente

    Nine of Uddālaka's lessons to Śvetaketu in the Chāndogya end with the same refrain: that subtle essence (aṇiman) is what all this has as its ātman; that is the real; that is the ātman; tat tvam asi (6.8.7–6.16.3). Śvetaketu's self is therefore not something apart: like the river that returns to the sea and no longer knows it was that river, or like honey made from different flowers, the individual comes from being and shares its essence. The Advaita tradition read the refrain as the great saying «you are that», a strict identity between the individual and brahman. The lesson is not presented as a theory, but as something the disciple must verify in things and recognise in himself.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Perché soffriamo?

    He does not analyse pain; he speaks of one lost who needs guidance

    Non si è pronunciato

    The teachings the Chāndogya puts in Uddālaka Āruṇi's mouth contain no diagnosis of suffering. Their subject is the origin and essence of things, not the cause of pain. The closest is a parable (6.14): a man is blindfolded, led far from his land of Gandhāra and abandoned in a deserted place; he cries out that he has been brought there blindfolded, until someone removes the blindfold and points out the way, and he, asking from village to village, returns home. So, says Uddālaka, one who has a teacher knows that he will remain here only as long as he is not set free. The image suggests that the human condition is a disorientation that knowledge corrects, but the text does not formulate it as a theory of suffering.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Che cosa accade dopo la morte?

    The body deprived of life dies; life does not die

    Ciò che sono non nasce e non muoreSi deduce dalla sua dottrina

    Uddālaka explains death to Śvetaketu with the image of a great tree: if its root, trunk or crown is struck, it bleeds but lives, because life pervades it; if life leaves a branch, the branch withers. So, he concludes, it is the body deprived of life that dies; life does not die (Chāndogya 6.11.3). In another passage he describes the process: in the dying person, speech is gathered into the mind, the mind into breath, breath into heat and heat into the highest deity, the being from which all proceeds (6.8.6; 6.15). Death is thus a return to the subtle essence that never ceased to be. Uddālaka also appears, in book V, receiving from a king the doctrine of the five fires and of the paths beyond.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Come si raggiunge la liberazione o la salvezza?

    To know that by which the unheard is heard and the unthought is thought

    Con la conoscenza direttaSi deduce dalla sua dottrina

    Uddālaka's teaching in the Chāndogya begins with a reproach: Śvetaketu returns proud after twelve years of Vedic study, and his father asks whether he knows the teaching by which the unheard becomes heard, the unthought thought and the unknown known (6.1.2–3). The goal is that knowledge of the being from which everything proceeds, and what follows are the lessons through which it is reached: clay, salt, the fig seed. The parable of the man from Gandhāra shows where it leads: one who has a teacher knows that he will remain here only as long as he is not set free, and then he will arrive (6.14.2). In the last lesson, the one who speaks the truth is not burned when he grasps the red-hot axe (6.16). Known truth protects and frees.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Serve un maestro?

    One who has a teacher knows the way home

    IndispensabileLo dice espressamente

    Uddālaka is, in the Chāndogya, the figure of the father who teaches: his entire sixth book is an instruction to his son Śvetaketu, made of questions, examples and small tests. And it is in that book that the need for a teacher is most clearly formulated. A blindfolded man is abandoned far from his land of Gandhāra; only when someone removes the blindfold and points out the direction can he return, asking from village to village. So, Uddālaka concludes, one who has a teacher (ācāryavān) knows: I remain here only as long as I am not set free, and then I shall arrive (6.14.2). The teacher does not replace the path, which the disciple walks himself, but without him one does not know which way to go.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Il mondo è reale?

    Being became many: heat, water and food, and entered into them

    Manifestazione del divinoLo dice espressamente

    For Uddālaka, the world comes from being (sat), which, wishing to be many, emitted heat; heat, water; and water, food (Chāndogya 6.2.3–4). It then entered those three «deities» with the living ātman and made them threefold, so that each thing contains all three: the red of fire is that of heat, the white that of water, the black that of food (6.3–4). His most famous example is clay: by one lump everything made of clay is known, because the modification is «a matter of words», a name, and the real is the substance (6.1.4). The world is not a dream, but being itself under names and forms; what dissolves on understanding it is the belief that things are something apart from their source.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Che cos'è l'amore?

    His lessons concern being, not love; they ask for trust

    Non si è pronunciato

    The teachings the Chāndogya and the Bṛhadāraṇyaka put in Uddālaka Āruṇi's mouth do not address love. Their subject is the origin of things, the subtle essence that sustains them and the relation between that essence and the disciple. The closest thing to an affective dimension lies in the tone of the teaching: he is a father instructing his son, calls him «dear one» (somya) again and again and, when Śvetaketu cannot see the invisible essence of the fig seed, asks him for trust (śraddhā). But the trust he asks for is that of a disciple who accepts what he does not yet understand, not a love directed to God or to one's neighbour, and the text does not develop it as a teaching.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Siamo liberi o è tutto determinato?

    He does not treat freedom; his last lesson is about truth

    Non si è pronunciato

    The teachings ascribed to Uddālaka Āruṇi do not address the question of freedom or fate. Their interest lies in the origin of things and in the subtle essence that sustains them, not in human action or its consequences. The doctrine of rebirth according to deeds, which the Chāndogya sets out in book V, Uddālaka receives from a king, Pravāhaṇa Jaivali, who warns him that this knowledge had not previously reached the brahmins. The closest thing to an ethic in his teaching is the last lesson to Śvetaketu (6.16): a man accused of theft is made to grasp a red-hot axe; if he has lied he is burned, and if he speaks the truth, protected by it, he is not. Truth is what frees, not a choice between alternatives.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Perché meditare o pregare?

    He teaches no meditation: he teaches looking and verifying

    Non si è pronunciato

    Uddālaka's lessons in the Chāndogya contain no practice of meditation or prayer. His method is different: questions, observation and small tests. He has Śvetaketu fast for fifteen days so that he finds that, without food, he cannot recall the Vedas, and that on eating he remembers them again (6.7); he asks him to dissolve salt in water and look for it by sight and by taste (6.13); he has him split a fig fruit and then a seed until he sees nothing inside (6.12). What is sought is not an induced inner state, but that the disciple should see for himself the subtle essence in things. When observation no longer reaches, Uddālaka proposes not a technique, but trust: «have faith, my dear».

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Può la ragione conoscere l'ultimo?

    Observe, compare, verify; and where sight fails, trust

    Fede e ragione si aiutanoSi deduce dalla sua dottrina

    Uddālaka's method in the Chāndogya is almost experimental. To teach Śvetaketu, who returns proud after twelve years of study, he does not cite texts: he has him fast for fifteen days to verify the relation between food and mind (6.7), dissolve salt in water and taste it (6.13), split a fig seed until he sees nothing (6.12). He reasons by analogies drawn from clay, copper and iron, and argues against those who said that being was born from non-being: how could that happen? (6.2.2). But observation has a limit: when the essence of the seed cannot be seen, Uddālaka asks for trust (śraddhā). Reason prepares and trust completes, in a knowledge the disciple must end up recognising in himself.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Ritirarsi dal mondo o trasformarlo?

    A householder who teaches his son; he does not raise renunciation

    Non si è pronunciato

    Uddālaka Āruṇi's teachings do not address the choice between withdrawing from the world and transforming it. His figure, as presented by the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa and the Upaniṣads, is that of a brahmin householder, an expert in ritual, who debates in assemblies, travels to learn from others —including kings such as Pravāhaṇa Jaivali and Aśvapati Kaikeya— and passes his knowledge on to his son and his disciples. He sends Śvetaketu to study with a teacher, receives him on his return and instructs him at home. The knowledge of being that he teaches does not require leaving that life, but the text does not raise it as a question either. The renunciation associated with his name belongs to the Āruṇi Upaniṣad, a much later text.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri

Aneddoti e racconti

Aneddoti e racconti

Documentatoépoca védica tardía (Chāndogya, ss. VII–VI a. C.)

Salt in water

To teach Śvetaketu that the real can be present without being seen, Uddālaka asks him to put a lump of salt into a pot of water and come back the next morning. In the morning he asks him to bring the salt. The son searches and cannot find it: it has dissolved. "Sip from the surface," the father says. "How does it taste?" — "Salty." "Sip from the middle." — "Salty." "Sip from the bottom." — "Salty." "Throw it away and come and sit with me." The salt, the father explains, is always there; in the same way, being is right here, though you do not perceive it. The lesson ends with the refrain repeated nine times in the chapter: "that subtle essence is what all this has as its self; that is the real; that is the ātman; tat tvam asi, Śvetaketu." It is perhaps the most quoted image in all Upaniṣadic literature.

Origine del racconto: Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.13. "Documented" indicates that the story is in the text, not that the scene is historical.

Fonte: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Documentatoépoca védica tardía

The fifteen-day fast

Uddālaka teaches his son that a person consists of sixteen parts and that the mind is made of food. To show it, he asks him not to eat for fifteen days and to drink only water, since breath, being made of water, will not be cut off. At the end of that time Śvetaketu returns, and his father asks him to recite the verses of the Ṛgveda, the formulas of the Yajurveda and the chants of the Sāmaveda. "They do not come to me," he answers. The father compares what is left of him to an ember the size of a firefly that survives a great fire and is not enough to burn anything. He tells him to eat, and when he returns Śvetaketu answers everything he is asked: the ember, fed with straw, has blazed up again. Chattopadhyaya saw the episode as one of the first recorded experiments in the history of thought.

Origine del racconto: Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.7. The "scientific" reading is Chattopadhyaya's (1977).

Fonte: Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad. Science and Society in Ancient India. Calcuta: Research India Publications, 1977.

Documentatoépoca védica tardía

The gold coin and the firewood

The Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa tells that Uddālaka Āruṇi was travelling through the northern country as a chosen priest and carried a gold coin, because in olden times whoever travelled thus offered a prize to encourage the timid to dispute with him. The brahmins of the north feared that this Kuru-Pañcāla brahmin, son of a brahmin, would take their territory, and chose Svaidāyana Śaunaka as their champion. Svaidāyana greeted him — "Hey, son of Gautama!" — and put to him questions about what the new- and full-moon sacrifices teach: why creatures are born toothless, why they turn grey, why semen is fertile only in middle age. Uddālaka handed him the coin, acknowledging his learning. To the others Svaidāyana said that whoever challenged that man would have his head split. Afterwards Uddālaka came back to him with firewood in hand: "I want to become your pupil." Svaidāyana explained the answers without requiring him to become one.

Origine del racconto: Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa XI.4.1.1–10 (Eggeling's translation, SBE 44, pp. 50–54), with a parallel version in Gopatha Brāhmaṇa 1.3.6. The exact meaning of some phrases (the coin, the "head that splits") is disputed, as Eggeling notes.

Fonte: Eggeling, Julius (trad.). The Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa, Part V (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 44). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900. XI.4.1 (Uddālaka Āruṇi y Svaidāyana) y XI.5.3 (Śauceya Prācīnayogya y Uddālaka Āruṇi sobre el agnihotra).

Documentatoépoca védica tardía

The king's five questions

Śvetaketu goes to the assembly of the Pañcālas, and King Pravāhaṇa Jaivali asks whether his father has instructed him. He puts five questions to him: where beings go on leaving this world, how they return, where the path of the gods and that of the ancestors part, why the other world does not fill up, and why at the fifth offering water acquires a human voice. Śvetaketu knows none of them. He returns home furious and reproaches his father for having told him he knew everything. Uddālaka admits that he does not know the answers either and, instead of defending his pride, goes to the court. The king offers him wealth; he asks only for those words. Pravāhaṇa makes him stay a long time and tells him: "This knowledge has never before reached the brahmins; that is why the rule of all the worlds has belonged to the kṣatriyas." And he teaches him the doctrine of the five fires.

Origine del racconto: Chāndogya Upaniṣad 5.3 (with another version in Bṛhadāraṇyaka 6.2). Black (2007) analyses these scenes of knowledge passing from kings to brahmins.

Fonte: Black, Brian. The Character of the Self in Ancient India: Priests, Kings, and Women in the Early Upaniṣads. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007.

Racconto agiograficorelato épico (Mahābhārata, ss. III a. C.–IV d. C.)

The pupil who lay down in the dyke

In the first book of the Mahābhārata, the sage Āyoda Dhaumya had three pupils, and he asked one of them, Āruṇi of Pañcāla, to stop a breach in the dyke of a field. Āruṇi tried without success and, to carry out the order, lay down in the breach and held back the water with his own body. Seeing that he did not return, the teacher went out with his other pupils to look for him and called him by name. Āruṇi rose from the breach and presented himself. Dhaumya, moved by his obedience, gave him a new name — Uddālaka, "he who rose breaking the dyke" — and blessed him: all the Vedas and treatises of law would be revealed to him. The story is an example of devotion to the teacher (gurubhakti) and a popular etymology of the name.

Origine del racconto: Mahābhārata 1.3 (Pauṣya-parvan; section 3 of Ganguli's translation). There is no Vedic parallel; the relation between this Āruṇi and the Uddālaka of the Upaniṣads is a traditional identification.

Fonte: Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trad.). The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa, vol. 1: Adi Parva. Calcuta, 1883–1896; Project Gutenberg n.º 15474 (sección 3, Āruṇi y Dhaumya; sección 122 de la vulgata, Śvetaketu). Para Aṣṭāvakra, Vana Parva 132–134 de la edición crítica.

Tradizione oralerelato épico

Śvetaketu and the law of marriage

The Mahābhārata puts in King Pāṇḍu's mouth a story about Uddālaka's family. In olden times, he says, women were not bound to a single man. One day, in the presence of Uddālaka and his son Śvetaketu, a brahmin took the latter's mother by the hand and led her away. Śvetaketu was outraged, but his father explained that this was the ancient custom. Śvetaketu, however, then established the rule that a woman who leaves her husband, and a husband who leaves a faithful wife, commit a sin. The story, which serves in the epic to justify other forms of descent, is often cited in studies on the history of marriage in India.

Origine del racconto: Mahābhārata 1.113 of the critical edition (section 122 of Ganguli's translation). It is an epic legend with no basis in the Vedic texts.

Fonte: Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trad.). The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa, vol. 1: Adi Parva. Calcuta, 1883–1896; Project Gutenberg n.º 15474 (sección 3, Āruṇi y Dhaumya; sección 122 de la vulgata, Śvetaketu). Para Aṣṭāvakra, Vana Parva 132–134 de la edición crítica.

Insegnamenti

Insegnamenti

Le nozioni che articolano il suo pensiero, spiegate nel loro contesto.

Tat tvam asi ("you are that")tat-tvam-asi
The refrain that closes nine of Uddālaka's lessons to Śvetaketu in the Chāndogya (6.8.7–6.16.3): that subtle essence (aṇiman) is what all this has as its self; that is the real; that is the ātman; tat tvam asi. Śaṅkara and the Advaita tradition read it as an identity between the individual ātman ("you") and brahman ("that"), and count it among the four "great sayings" (mahāvākya) of the Upaniṣads. Rāmānuja understood it as a relation of inherence: the Lord is the inner self of the individual. Joel Brereton (1986) showed that, grammatically, the neuter pronoun tat may refer back to the subtle essence or have adverbial force, and proposed translating "that's how you are"; Patrick Olivelle translates "and that's how you are, Śvetaketu". In every reading the sentence asserts that the person is made of the same invisible reality as the rest of the universe.

Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6; Brereton 1986; Olivelle 1996.

Fonte: Brereton, Joel P. «Tat Tvam Asi in Context». Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 136 (1986): 98–109.

Sat (being, one without a second)sat
Uddālaka asserts that in the beginning there was only being, "one without a second", and explicitly rejects the view of those who said that in the beginning there was non-being and that being was born from non-being: "how could being be born from non-being?". Being, wishing to become many, emitted heat; heat, water; water, food. This cosmology, which derives everything from a single existing principle rather than from chaos or a primordial sacrifice, is the core of Vedāntic ontology and was invoked by all its schools.

Chāndogya 6.2.

Fonte: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Trivṛtkaraṇa (the triplication of the elements)trivrtkarana
According to Uddālaka, being entered the three "deities" — heat, water and food — with the living ātman and made them threefold, so that each thing contains all three. The red of fire is the colour of heat, white that of water, black that of food; seeing this, he says, the "fire-ness" of fire vanishes, for it is only a name. The same analysis is applied to the human body, in which food becomes flesh and mind, water becomes blood and breath, and heat becomes bone and speech. The doctrine, which Vedānta later developed as "quintuplication" (pañcīkaraṇa), has been noted by Chattopadhyaya as an early attempt at a natural explanation of matter.

Chāndogya 6.3–6.6.

Fonte: Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad. Science and Society in Ancient India. Calcuta: Research India Publications, 1977.

Aṇiman (the subtle essence)animan
What Uddālaka seeks in his examples is a reality so fine that it cannot be perceived and yet sustains everything: the invisible interior of the fig seed from which the great tree grows, the salt that cannot be seen in the water and is in every sip, the life that pervades the tree and without which it withers. This "fineness" (aṇiman) he calls the self of all, the real and the ātman. The concept unites physical observation and metaphysical speculation, and it is the grammatical subject on which the interpretation of "tat tvam asi" depends.

Chāndogya 6.8–6.16.

Fonte: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Vācārambhaṇa (modification is only a name)vacarambhana
In the first lesson Uddālaka says that by one lump of clay everything made of clay is known, by one piece of copper everything of copper, by one nail-cutter everything of iron, because the modification (vikāra) is "a matter of words" (vācārambhaṇa), a name, and the real is the substance. The formula became the proof text of the Vedāntic theory of causation: Advaita used it to argue that the world is an appearance (vivarta) on brahman, other schools to hold that the effect pre-exists in the cause (satkāryavāda).

Chāndogya 6.1.4–6; Brahmasūtra 2.1.14 and its commentaries.

Fonte: Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.

Video

Video

Registrazioni, interviste e documentari. I video vengono riprodotti da YouTube; non sono ospitati qui.

  • Tat Tvam Asi (That Thou Art) | Swami Sarvapriyananda

    Conferenza· EN· 2021· 101 min

    Vedanta Society of New YorkCanale ufficiale

  • Talk on Tat Tvam Asi - The Ultimate Equation by Swami Sarvapriyananda

    Conferenza· EN· 2026· 115 min

    Ramakrishna Vedanta Centre U.K.Canale ufficiale

  • The Story of Svetaketu - Thou Art That - Chandogya Upanishad | Pravrajika Divyanandaprana

    Conferenza· EN· 2018· 20 min

    VivekaVani

  • Chandogya Upanishad Chapter-6 01

    Conferenza· EN· 2022· 74 min

    Chinmaya Mission San JoseCanale ufficiale

  • Chandogya Upanishad Ch 6 – An Exposition of Tat Tvam Asi | Swami Ramakrishnananda | Dis 01

    Conferenza· EN· 2026· 68 min

    Shravana Mangalam

  • Chandogya Upanishad Lecture - 1 (Chapter 6 - 1 - 1 to 6 - 1 - 4)

    Conferenza· EN· 2026· 76 min

    Vedanta Students

  • श्वेतकेतु और उद्दालक, उपनिषद की कहानी, छान्द्योग्यापनिषद

    Conferenza· HI· 2020· 35 min

    G.V.B. The University of Veda

  • CHANDOGYA. VER LO INVISIBLE

    Analisi· ES· 2022· 14 min

    Vedanta en Español

  • El pensamiento en la India: Hinduismo

    Documentario· ES· 2017· 25 min

    UNED DocumentosCanale ufficiale

  • The Upanishads: The Sacred Text that Changed India and the West | Jeffery Long, Ph.D.

    Conferenza· EN· 2022· 56 min

    Theosophical SocietyCanale ufficiale

  • Introduction to the Rig Veda and Upanishads | Kendall Sharp | First Friday Lecture

    Conferenza· EN· 2024· 78 min

    The University of Chicago Graham SchoolCanale ufficiale

  • The Central Doctrines of the Upanishads

    Conferenza· EN· 2016· 37 min

    Vidya-mitraCanale ufficiale

Galleria

Galleria

Immagini con licenza verificata. Ciascuna conserva la sua paternità e la sua attribuzione.

Manoscritti

Manoscritti

Testimoni manoscritti e testi antichi, con il loro custode e le loro condizioni di consultazione.

Manoscritti →

Relazioni

Relazioni

Influenze, discepolati e affinità. Si distingue la relazione documentata dalla somiglianza individuata per analisi.

  • Maestro di

    Yajnavalkya

    The Bṛhadāraṇyaka's lists of teachers make Yājñavalkya Uddālaka's pupil ("Yājñavalkya from Uddālaka; Uddālaka from Aruṇa").

    Relazione documentata

  • Dissentì da

    Yajnavalkya

    He questions him at Janaka's court about the thread and the inner controller and falls silent after his answer (Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7).

    Relazione documentata

  • Famiglia di

    Śvetaketu Āruṇeya

    His son and pupil, recipient of the teaching of Chāndogya 6.

    Relazione documentata

  • Famiglia di

    Ashtavakra

    According to the Mahābhārata (3.132–134), Aṣṭāvakra was the son of Sujātā, Uddālaka's daughter, and of his pupil Kahoḍa; that is, his grandson. A legendary, not Vedic, relationship.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Discepolo di

    Pravāhaṇa Jaivali

    The king of the Pañcālas teaches him the doctrine of the five fires (Chāndogya 5.3–10; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 6.2).

    Relazione documentata

  • Influenzò

    Adi Shankara

    Śaṅkara commented on the Chāndogya and made "tat tvam asi" one of the great sayings of Advaita; he analyses it at length in the Upadeśasāhasrī.

    Relazione documentata

  • Idee affini a

    Ramana Maharshi

    Inquiry into the self as the substratum of all experience extends the Advaita reading of "tat tvam asi".

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Idee affini a

    Heraclitus

    Comparative philosophy (Scharfstein) has linked Uddālaka's search for a single principle behind change with that of the first Greek philosophers.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Idee affini a

    Empedocles

    The theory of three elements combining in all things has been compared with Empedocles' roots.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Idee affini a

    Parmenides

    The rejection of being arising from non-being (Chāndogya 6.2.2) is a frequent parallel in comparative philosophy.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Influenzò

    Gaudapada

    Gauḍapāda's Kārikā develops, in terms of non-origination, the thesis that the effect is not different from its cause, illustrated by the clay of Chāndogya 6.1.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

Fonti

Fonti

Bibliografia e cataloghi consultati per questa scheda.

  1. Wikidata, «Aruni» (Uddālaka Āruṇi), QID Q2724299.
  2. Olivelle, Patrick (ed. y trad.). The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Chāndogya 5.3–5.24 y 6; Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.7, 6.2, 6.3.7 y 6.5; Kauṣītaki 1.1.
  3. Olivelle, Patrick (trad.). Upaniṣads. Oxford World's Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 (traducción «And that's how you are, Śvetaketu» de Chāndogya 6.8.7 y ss.).
  4. Müller, F. Max (trad.). The Upanishads, Part I (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879 (Khândogya y Kaushîtaki-brâhmaṇa-upanishad); y Part II (SBE 15), 1884, nota a Kaṭha 1.11.
  5. Brereton, Joel P. «Tat Tvam Asi in Context». Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 136 (1986): 98–109.
  6. Eggeling, Julius (trad.). The Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa, Part V (Sacred Books of the East, vol. 44). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900. XI.4.1 (Uddālaka Āruṇi y Svaidāyana) y XI.5.3 (Śauceya Prācīnayogya y Uddālaka Āruṇi sobre el agnihotra).
  7. Chattopadhyaya, Debiprasad. Science and Society in Ancient India. Calcuta: Research India Publications, 1977.
  8. Witzel, Michael. «Yājñavalkya as Ritualist and Philosopher, and His Personal Language». En S. Adhami (ed.), Paitimāna: Essays in Iranian, Indo-European, and Indian Studies in Honor of Hanns-Peter Schmidt. Costa Mesa: Mazda, 2003, pp. 103–143 (n. 13: árbol genealógico Upaveśi – Aruṇa Aupaveśi – Uddālaka Āruṇi Gautama – Śvetaketu Āruṇeya).
  9. Black, Brian. The Character of the Self in Ancient India: Priests, Kings, and Women in the Early Upaniṣads. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007.
  10. Ganguli, Kisari Mohan (trad.). The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa, vol. 1: Adi Parva. Calcuta, 1883–1896; Project Gutenberg n.º 15474 (sección 3, Āruṇi y Dhaumya; sección 122 de la vulgata, Śvetaketu). Para Aṣṭāvakra, Vana Parva 132–134 de la edición crítica.
  11. Olivelle, Patrick (trad.). The Saṃnyāsa Upaniṣads: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1992 (Āruṇi Upaniṣad).
  12. Scharfstein, Ben-Ami. A Comparative History of World Philosophy: From the Upanishads to Kant. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.
  13. Wikisource en sánscrito, «छान्दोग्योपनिषद्» (texto por adhyāya; adhyāya 5 y 6) y «बृहदारण्यकोपनिषद्» (6.5).
  14. Wikipedia (en inglés), «Uddalaka Aruni», consultada el 26 de octubre de 2026 (Āruṇi Upaniṣad, Āruṇi-śruti citada por Madhva, episodio de Dhaumya).
  15. Hume, Robert Ernest (trad.). The Thirteen Principal Upanishads. Londres: Oxford University Press, 1921.
  16. Ilárraz, Félix G., y Óscar Pujol (trads.). La sabiduría del bosque: antología de las principales Upaniṣad. Madrid: Trotta, 2003.
  17. Wikimedia Commons, ficheros y metadatos de licencia consultados mediante la API (imageinfo/extmetadata).
  18. Mitra, Rājendralāla (trad.). The Chhándogya Upanishad of the Sáma Veda, with Extracts from the Commentary of Śankara Áchárya. Calcuta: Baptist Mission Press (Bibliotheca Indica), 1862.
  19. Gambhirananda, Swami (trad.). Chāndogya Upaniṣad, with the Commentary of Śaṅkarācārya. Calcuta: Advaita Ashrama, 1983 (reimpr. 2006).
  20. Deussen, Paul (trad.). Sechzig Upanishad's des Veda. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1897.
Titolare dei diritti
Los textos sánscritos son de dominio público. Las traducciones modernas tienen derechos propios: Oxford University Press (Olivelle; Hume hasta 2029 en España), Trotta (Ilárraz y Pujol), Penguin (Roebuck), Advaita Ashrama (Gambhirananda), Hastinapura (versión española de Nikhilananda). Las de Mitra (1862), Müller (1879), Eggeling (1900) y Deussen (1897) son de dominio público.

In attesa di conferma

Ciò che questa scheda non ha ancora potuto chiarire. Preferiamo dirlo piuttosto che riempirlo.

  • Mahābhārata: comprobar en la edición crítica las referencias 1.3 (Āruṇi y Dhaumya), 1.113 (Śvetaketu) y 3.132–134 (Aṣṭāvakra) frente a la numeración de Ganguli.
  • Kaṭha Upaniṣad 1.11: localizar la nota exacta de Max Müller (SBE 15) sobre «Auddālaki Āruṇi» y la identificación de Śaṅkara.
  • Chattopadhyaya, Science and Society in Ancient India: confirmar paginación del capítulo sobre Uddālaka y la editorial de la primera edición (Calcuta, 1977; reimpresión de B. R. Grüner, Ámsterdam).
  • Āruṇi-śruti citada por Madhva: localizar la referencia en las obras de Madhva o en un estudio especializado.
  • Ediciones: buscar ISBN de traducciones de la Chāndogya al francés, alemán, ruso e hindi; identificar al traductor español de la edición de Hastinapura (ISBN 9789509102699).
  • Relaciones: los slugs svetaketu y pravahana-jaivali no existen en el Atlas.
  • Vídeos: no se ha encontrado un documental de televisión pública ni una clase universitaria monográfica sobre Uddālaka; los vídeos registrados son conferencias de instituciones vedánticas y clases generales sobre las Upaniṣad.

Ricerca effettuata il 2026-10-26