Vai al contenuto
The ConsciousLibrary

Filosofia presocratica

Empedocles

Ἐμπεδοκλῆς ὁ Ἀκραγαντῖνος

ca. 494 a.C. – ca. 434 a.C.Persona storicamente documentata

Filosofo, medico e politico di Akragas, in Sicilia (c. 494-434 a.C.), autore di due poemi in esametri, Sulla natura e le Purificazioni, dei quali restano circa cinquecento versi e il papiro di Strasburgo. Insegnò che tutto si compone di quattro radici eterne, mescolate dall'Amore e separate dalla Contesa, e che l'anima, esiliata per il sangue versato, trasmigra attraverso tutte le forme viventi. La leggenda del suo salto nell'Etna ne fece una figura letteraria.

opere
11opere
edizioni
25edizioni
citazioni
14citazioni
video
10video
immagini
7immagini
Empédocles, grabado de 1580

Empédocles, grabado de 1580 · CC BY 4.0

Con le sue parole

«For straitened are the powers that are spread over their bodily parts.»

DK 31 B2.1, en Sexto Empírico, Contra los matemáticos VII 123. Griego: texto de Fairbanks (1898), basado en la edición de Stein; numeración Diels-Kranz. Inglés: John Burnet, Early Greek Philosophy (1908). Español: traducción propia.

On Nature — Empedocles

Per cominciare, un'opera

On Nature

La sua idea centrale

The four roots (rhizomata): Empedocles accepts with Parmenides that nothing comes from what is not or is annihilated, but he does not give up explaining change.

Biografia

5 min di lettura

Traduzione assistita dall'originale spagnolo, in attesa di revisione da parte di un traduttore madrelingua.

Il filosofo che si disse dio

Di nessun presocratico si conservano tanti versi quanti di Empedocle: quasi cinquecento, ai quali il papiro di Strasburgo ne aggiunse nel 1999 alcune decine. Scrisse, come Parmenide, in esametri, e fu insieme fisico, medico, oratore, politico democratico, profeta della purezza e taumaturgo. La sua teoria delle quattro «radici» — fuoco, aria, acqua e terra — mosse dall'Amore e dalla Contesa dominò la scienza europea per duemila anni; il suo annuncio di essere «un dio immortale, non più un mortale» e la leggenda del suo salto nell'Etna fecero di lui una delle figure più romanzesche dell'Antichità. Aristotele lo chiamò inventore della retorica e, al tempo stesso, gli rimproverò di non avere del poeta altro che il metro.

Akragas

Nacque ad Akragas, l'odierna Agrigento, la città più ricca della Sicilia greca, i cui templi dorici dominano ancora la valle. Suo padre si chiamava Metone e suo nonno, anch'egli Empedocle, vinse la corsa dei cavalli a Olimpia nel 496 a.C., secondo Aristotele citato da Eratostene. Apollodoro fissò la sua akmè al 444-443 a.C., anno della fondazione di Turi, che Glauco di Reggio dice che visitò; Aristotele affermava che morì a sessant'anni. Burnet ha riassunto ciò che si può sapere: era fanciullo sotto il tiranno Terone, era attivo ad Akragas dopo il 472, quando cadde suo figlio Trasideo e la città riconquistò un governo libero, e morì dopo il 444. Da qui le date consuete, intorno al 494-434 a.C.

Il democratico

Lo storico siceliota Timeo, che scrisse un secolo e mezzo dopo raccogliendo tradizioni locali, raccontava che la sua carriera politica cominciò durante un banchetto: un magistrato vi si comportò da aspirante tiranno ed Empedocle, il giorno seguente, lo trascinò in tribunale e ne ottenne la condanna a morte. Si oppose anche a che il consiglio concedesse al medico Acrone un terreno per il sepolcro del padre e sciolse l'assemblea dei Mille, forse un'associazione oligarchica. Aristotele aggiungeva che rifiutò la regalità quando gliela offrirono. Secondo Timeo, i discendenti dei suoi nemici impedirono in seguito il suo ritorno, ed Empedocle morì esule nel Peloponneso.

Medico, oratore e mago

Galeno lo collocò, insieme a Filistione e Pausania, all'origine della scuola medica italica, rivale di quelle di Cos e di Cnido. Il suo discepolo Gorgia di Leontini, il grande sofista, raccontava secondo Satiro di averlo visto praticare la magia; Eraclide Pontico narrò come avesse tenuto in vita per trenta giorni una donna senza respiro né polso. Timeo lo chiamò «colui che ferma i venti» per aver appeso pelli d'asino allo scopo di frenare i venti etesii, e altri gli attribuirono la bonifica delle paludi di Selinunte. Burnet osservò che quasi tutti questi prodigi si ricavano dai suoi stessi versi, nei quali promette al discepolo Pausania rimedi contro la vecchiaia, potere sui venti e sulla pioggia e perfino la facoltà di ricondurre un morto dall'Ade.

Due poemi

Diogene Laerzio attribuisce ai suoi due grandi poemi, Sulla natura e le Purificazioni, circa cinquemila versi. Il primo, dedicato a Pausania, espone una fisica: nulla nasce e nulla muore, soltanto si mescolano e si separano quattro radici eterne, alle quali dà nomi divini — Zeus, Era, Aidoneo e Nesti —, sotto l'azione alterna dell'Amore, che unisce, e della Contesa, che separa. Il cosmo oscilla così tra l'unità perfetta dello Sfero e la dispersione totale, e nelle fasi intermedie sorgono i viventi, dapprima come membra sparse — teste senza collo, braccia senza spalle — che si combinano a caso. Il secondo poema, rivolto ai suoi concittadini di Akragas, parla di un dàimon esiliato per trentamila stagioni per aver versato sangue, che si reincarna in tutte le forme mortali; da qui il divieto di mangiare carne e di sacrificare animali.

La critica moderna discusse per un secolo se i due poemi fossero compatibili — un fisico meccanicista e un profeta religioso — o se fossero in realtà uno solo. Brad Inwood e altri giunsero a proporre che formassero un'unica opera; Catherine Osborne sottolineò la continuità tra fisica e religione.

Il papiro di Strasburgo

Nel 1904 la Bibliothèque nationale et universitaire di Strasburgo acquistò in Egitto alcuni frammenti di papiro provenienti da Panopoli (Akhmim), che rimasero non identificati per novant'anni. Nel 1994 il papirologo Alain Martin vi riconobbe versi di Empedocle, e nel 1999 li pubblicò con Oliver Primavesi. Copiati alla fine del I secolo d.C., contengono resti di circa settantaquattro versi, in parte sconosciuti, del primo libro della fisica, con un segno che indica il trecentesimo verso. La scoperta mostrò che in quel libro il ciclo cosmico compariva accanto a lamenti per il «giorno spietato» in cui si mangiò carne, cioè che la fisica e la dottrina della colpa erano più intrecciate di quanto si credesse.

L'Etna e le altre morti

Diogene Laerzio raccoglie versioni inconciliabili della sua fine. Eraclide Pontico raccontava che, dopo un sacrificio, scomparve di notte; un servo udì una voce che lo chiamava e vide una luce nel cielo, e Pausania ordinò di onorarlo come un dio. Ippoboto aggiungeva che si gettò nel cratere dell'Etna perché lo si credesse immortale, ma il vulcano restituì uno dei suoi sandali di bronzo. Timeo lo negava: Empedocle partì per il Peloponneso e non tornò mai più. Neante diceva che morì per una caduta dal carro, altri che si impiccò. Orazio fissò per i posteri la versione dell'Etna. Ava Chitwood ha mostrato che, come nel caso di Eraclito, queste morti furono fabbricate a partire dai suoi poemi: chi si proclamava dio immortale e faceva del fuoco una radice del mondo doveva morire divinizzato o divorato dal fuoco.

Eredità

Aristotele adottò i suoi quattro elementi, aggiungendovi l'etere, e con essi la medicina dei quattro umori; Platone alluse alle «muse sicule» e Lucrezio lo celebrò come il più grande dei figli della Sicilia. In età moderna Hölderlin scrisse, senza terminarla, la tragedia La morte di Empedocle (1797-1800); Matthew Arnold, il poema drammatico Empedocle sull'Etna (1852), e Freud riconobbe nell'Amore e nella Contesa un precedente della sua opposizione tra Eros e pulsione di morte. Resta l'esempio più chiaro del fatto che, alle sue origini, la filosofia greca non separava la scienza, la poesia e la salvezza.

Fonti: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres VIII 51–77 (Empédocles), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342); trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb, 1925 (Wikisource). · Diels, Hermann y Kranz, Walther. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6.ª ed. Weidmann, Berlín, 1951–1952, cap. 31 (Empedokles), A (testimonios) y B 1–154. · Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. y Schofield, M. The Presocratic Philosophers, 2.ª ed. Cambridge University Press, 1983, cap. X (Empedocles of Acragas). Trad. esp. de Jesús García Fernández, Gredos, 1987. · Burnet, John. Early Greek Philosophy, 2.ª ed. A. and C. Black, Londres, 1908, cap. V (Empedokles of Akragas), §§ 98–105 y traducción de los fragmentos (Project Gutenberg n.º 67097). · Martin, Alain y Primavesi, Oliver. L'Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666): introduction, édition et commentaire. Walter de Gruyter / Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg, Berlín, Nueva York y Estrasburgo, 1999.

Cronologia

La vita, anno per anno

Ogni punto è un evento documentato. Fai clic per leggerlo, con la sua fonte e il suo grado di certezza.

  1. 496 a.C.

    His grandfather's Olympic victory

    His grandfather Empedocles wins the horse race at the 71st Olympiad (496 BCE), according to Eratosthenes citing Aristotle (Diogenes Laertius VIII 51). Years BCE are expressed as negative numbers.

    Probabile

  2. ca. 494 a.C. · 0 anni

    Birth

    Born at Acragas, son of Meton, of a wealthy and distinguished family. The date is inferred from his death at sixty (Aristotle) and his activity after 472; Wikidata records 494, 492 and 490.

    Probabile

  3. ca. 471 a.C. · 23 anni

    Fall of Thrasydaeus and free government

    After Theron's death (472 BCE), his son Thrasydaeus is defeated by Hieron of Syracuse and expelled; Acragas recovers a free government in which Empedocles will be a democratic leader.

    Documentato

  4. ca. 460 a.C.

    Dissolution of the assembly of the Thousand

    According to Timaeus (in Diogenes Laertius VIII 64–66), he prosecutes two magistrates with tyrannical airs, opposes Acron's funerary privilege and dissolves the assembly of the Thousand. He refuses the kingship offered to him (Aristotle). Dates unknown.

    Tradizione

  5. ca. 450 a.C.

    Composition of the poems

    He composes On Nature, dedicated to Pausanias, and the Purifications, addressed to the people of Acragas. The date and order of composition are conjectural.

    Discusso

  6. 444 a.C.

    Visit to Thurii

    Glaucus of Rhegium relates that he came to Thurii shortly after its foundation (444–443 BCE); Apollodorus fixed his prime in that year.

    Probabile

  7. ca. 440 a.C.

    Exile

    According to Timaeus, the descendants of his enemies oppose his return to Acragas and he withdraws to the Peloponnese. Date unknown.

    Tradizione

  8. ca. 434 a.C. · 60 anni

    Death

    Dies at about sixty (Aristotle in Diogenes Laertius VIII 52 and 74). The versions of the manner and place—vanishing after a sacrifice, leaping into Etna, falling from his chariot, dying in the Peloponnese—are contradictory.

    Discusso

  9. 427 a.C.

    Gorgias in Athens

    His pupil Gorgias of Leontini comes to Athens as ambassador and dazzles with an artistic prose that, according to Diels, owed much to Empedocles' style.

    Documentato

  10. ca. 90 a.C.

    Copy of the Strasbourg papyrus

    A scribe copies the first book of Empedocles' physics on a roll; its remains, reused in a funerary ornament, are the only direct witness to the poem.

    Documentato

  11. ca. 55 a.C.

    Lucretius praises him

    In De rerum natura (I 716–733) Lucretius celebrates Empedocles as the most admirable man Sicily produced, though he criticises his theory of elements.

    Documentato

  12. ca. 1798

    Hölderlin's Death of Empedocles

    Friedrich Hölderlin writes three unfinished versions of the tragedy Der Tod des Empedokles (1797–1800).

    Documentato

  13. 1852

    Matthew Arnold's Empedocles on Etna

    Matthew Arnold publishes the dramatic poem Empedocles on Etna, and Other Poems.

    Documentato

  14. 1994

    Identification of the papyrus

    Alain Martin identifies as lines of Empedocles the fragments P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666, acquired in 1904.

    Documentato

  15. 1999

    L'Empédocle de Strasbourg

    Alain Martin and Oliver Primavesi publish the edition of the papyrus, adding some seventy-four lines, partly new, to the corpus.

    Documentato

Opere

Opere essenziali

Le opere senza le quali non si comprende la sua eredità.

On Nature — Empedocles

Opera scritta · ca. 450 a.C.

On Nature

Περὶ φύσεως (Φυσικά)

A didactic poem in hexameters setting out Empedocles' physics. Nothing is born or perishes: four eternal roots—Zeus, Hera, Aidoneus and Nestis, that is, fire, air or earth, and water depending on the interpretation—are only mixed and separated under Love, which unites, and Strife, which separates. The cosmos alternates between the unity of the Sphere and dispersion, and in the intermediate phases living beings arise, first as loose limbs combining at random. It includes a theory of perception through effluences and pores, the comparison of breathing with the clepsydra and a physiology of the blood as the seat of thought.

12 edizioni · amazon.com

Purifications — Empedocles

Opera scritta · ca. 445 a.C.

Purifications

Καθαρμοί

A poem addressed to the "friends who dwell in the great city by yellow Acragas", to whom Empedocles presents himself as "an immortal god, no longer mortal", followed by crowds asking for oracles and cures. It sets out the oracle of Necessity: the daimon who stains his hands with blood is banished for thirty thousand seasons and reborn in every mortal form; the poet himself has been boy, girl, bush, bird and fish. Hence the condemnation of animal sacrifice and meat-eating—the father who kills his transformed son without recognising him—and the evocation of a golden age under Cypris when no altar was stained with bulls' blood. Favorinus relates that the rhapsode Cleomenes recited it at Olympia.

9 edizioni · amazon.com

Strasbourg papyrus (fragments of On Nature, book I) — Empedocles

Manoscritto · ca. 90

Strasbourg papyrus (fragments of On Nature, book I)

P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666

Remains of a papyrus roll from Panopolis (Akhmim, Egypt), acquired in 1904 by the Strasbourg library and reused in antiquity, according to its editors, for a funerary ornament. Its fragments—52, according to the editors—fall into several ensembles; the main one (a) contains lines 233–300 of the first book, identified by a stichometric mark (the letter gamma, 300), and connects with fragment B17. Besides new details of the cosmic cycle and zoogony, it includes first-person lines on the "pitiless day" on which the crime of eating flesh was committed, forcing a rethinking of the separation between the two poems.

4 edizioni · amazon.com

Citazioni

Citazioni localizzate in un'opera precisa. Ciascuna porta con sé la sua provenienza e il suo grado di affidabilità.

For straitened are the powers that are spread over their bodily parts.

στεινωποὶ μὲν γὰρ παλάμαι κατὰ γυῖα κέχυνται.

VerificataDK 31 B2.1, en Sexto Empírico, Contra los matemáticos VII 123. Griego: texto de Fairbanks (1898), basado en la edición de Stein; numeración Diels-Kranz. Inglés: John Burnet, Early Greek Philosophy (1908). Español: traducción propia.

1 / 14
Citazioni apocrife o di attribuzione discussa (3)
  • «Everything is composed of four elements: earth, water, air and fire.»

    The doctrine is his, but not the vocabulary: Empedocles speaks of "roots" (rhizomata) and names them after gods. The term "elements" (stoicheia) comes from Plato and Aristotle.

  • «The nature of God is a circle whose centre is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere.»

    Often ascribed to Empedocles, it comes from the Book of the Twenty-Four Philosophers (12th century), proposition II, and was spread by Alan of Lille, Meister Eckhart, Nicholas of Cusa and Pascal.

  • «The people of Acragas indulge in pleasure as if they were to die tomorrow, and build their houses as if they were to live for ever.»

    Diogenes Laertius (VIII 63) puts it in Empedocles' mouth, but Aelian (Varia Historia XII 29) ascribes an almost identical saying to Plato. It is a wandering apophthegm with no secure source.

Ultime parole

Non esistono testimonianze verificabili delle sue ultime parole.

No record of his last words survives. The versions of his death collected by Diogenes Laertius (VIII 67–75) are contradictory and legendary; in Heraclides of Pontus' version the only thing heard is a voice calling him in the night.

Fonte: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres VIII 51–77 (Empédocles), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342); trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb, 1925 (Wikisource).

Chiedi

Ciò a cui risponde la sua opera

Dodici grandi domande dell'umanità e ciò che i suoi testi permettono di rispondere, con riferimenti. Non gli mettiamo mai parole in bocca.

  • Che cos'è l'Assoluto? Dio esiste?

    A holy and ineffable mind, with neither head nor human limbs

    Un Assoluto impersonaleLo dice espressamente

    Empedocles fills his physics with divine names: the four roots are called Zeus, Hera, Aidoneus and Nestis, and the two forces that join and separate them are Love and Strife. When Love prevails, everything fuses in the Sphere, round and rejoicing in its solitude, which fragments B27–29 treat as a god. But in fragment B134 he explicitly rejects the anthropomorphic image: the divine has no human head upon its limbs, no arms or feet, but is only a holy and ineffable mind that darts through the whole cosmos with swift thoughts. The ultimate is thus divine and intelligent, yet faceless: a principle that thinks the world, not a lord who governs it from outside.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Chi sono io? Esiste un vero sé?

    A daimon exiled from the gods, wandering through many forms

    Un'anima in evoluzioneLo dice espressamente

    In the Purifications Empedocles speaks of himself as one of the long-lived daimons who, for having stained their hands with blood and trusted in Strife, have been exiled far from the blessed for thrice ten thousand seasons, being born in all kinds of mortal forms. He claims to have been already a boy and a girl, a bush, a bird and a mute fish of the sea, and describes the weeping of the newcomer to an unfamiliar place. The end of the journey is return: the best become seers, poets, physicians and leaders, and from there they spring up as gods, table companions of the immortals. The true self is that daimon passing through lives until it recovers its divine condition.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Perché soffriamo?

    We suffer because Strife exiled us from the blessed

    La separazione da DioLo dice espressamente

    In the Purifications suffering has a precise origin. Empedocles counts himself among the daimons who, for having shed blood and trusted in raging Strife, were cast far from the gods and condemned to be born in mortal forms. The world they reach is a joyless place of murder, wrath and disease, and he himself says he wept on seeing the unfamiliar place. The slaughter continues: humans sacrifice and eat animals without seeing that they devour one another, and a father slaughters among prayers his son changed in form. Pain is exile, and its causes are bloodshed and the dominion of Strife over Love.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Che cosa accade dopo la morte?

    There is no birth or death, only mixture; the daimon transmigrates until it returns

    Rinascita secondo il karmaLo dice espressamente

    Empedocles answers in two registers. In On Nature he denies that there is properly birth or death of mortal things: there is only mixture and exchange of what is mixed, and “birth” is a name humans give them. In the Purifications the exiled daimon passes for thrice ten thousand seasons through every kind of form — boy and girl, bush, bird and fish — and that is why eating meat is killing a kinsman. At the end of the cycle, the purified are born as seers, poets, physicians and leaders, and from there rise as gods, free of human pains and table companions of the immortals. Death is a step in the journey home.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Come si raggiunge la liberazione o la salvezza?

    Abstain from blood, purify oneself and reach divine thoughts

    Con una pratica disciplinataLo dice espressamente

    The poem tradition calls the Purifications offers a way for the exiled daimon to return among the gods. Its core is an ethic of non-violence: to stop shedding blood, because the sacrificed animal may be a kinsman changed in form, and to abstain from certain foods, including beans and laurel. Knowledge is added to that discipline: blessed is he who has gained the wealth of divine thoughts, and wretched he who holds a dark opinion about the gods. The purified ascend through the highest callings — seers, poets, physicians, leaders — until they spring up as gods. It is a way of practice and sustained purification.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Serve un maestro?

    A sage who speaks as a god passes a guarded knowledge to his disciple

    IndispensabileSi deduce dalla sua dottrina

    On Nature is addressed to a disciple, Pausanias, and Empedocles asks him to keep what he hears in his silent heart. He promises him knowledge of remedies against ills and old age, of stilling the winds and bringing a dead man back from Hades: a knowledge only he can impart. In the Purifications he presents himself to the citizens of Acragas as an immortal god, followed by crowds asking for oracles and cures. At the same time he acknowledges the limits of mortal knowledge and entreats the Muse. The figure that emerges is that of an inspired sage whose word is the necessary vehicle of truth, though the disciple must test it with all his senses.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Il mondo è reale?

    Four roots that Love unites and Strife divides, in an endless cycle

    Un ordine naturale in trasformazioneLo dice espressamente

    Empedocles accepts from Parmenides that nothing comes from nothing nor is annihilated, but he saves the reality of the sensible world: what there is are four eternal roots — fire, air, earth and water — which mix and separate. Two forces move them: Love, which unites, and Strife, which divides. The account is double: sometimes everything comes together into one through Love, sometimes each thing is borne apart by the hatred of Strife, and this alternating change never ceases. Living beings, including the strange creatures of a primitive zoogony, arise from these combinations. The world is real and is a cyclical process of union and separation.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Che cos'è l'amore?

    Love gathers what is separated until it fuses all in the Sphere

    Anelito e unioneLo dice espressamente

    In Empedocles Love (Philotes, also called Aphrodite or Cypris) is one of the two forces moving the cosmos. It unites the separated roots and, when it rules completely, everything gathers in the Sphere, a round god rejoicing in its solitude, in which there is no strife. Humans know that force in their own limbs, he says, when they think loving thoughts and perform works of concord, but they do not see that it is the same one that whirls in the universe. In the Purifications the reign of Cypris is the golden age when no blood was shed. Love is thus the cosmic force returning what is scattered to the original unity, the exiled soul included.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Siamo liberi o è tutto determinato?

    A decree of Necessity punishes shed blood, but purification is possible

    Karma e sceltaLo dice espressamente

    Empedocles opens fragment B115 with an oracle of Necessity, an ancient decree of the gods, eternal and sealed with broad oaths: when one of the daimons stains his limbs with blood or swears falsely following Strife, he wanders far from the blessed for thrice ten thousand seasons. There is thus a cosmic law binding faults to their consequences over many lives. But that law does not cancel responsibility: Empedocles urges his hearers to leave off slaughter and abstain from the impure, and states that the purified ascend until they become gods. The past conditions; the present can change the course.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Perché meditare o pregare?

    A bloodless worship and a pure mind contemplating what it has learned

    Rito e coltivazione di séLo dice espressamente

    The Purifications propose a reform of worship. In the golden age, when Cypris reigned, humans honoured the goddess with painted images, perfumes, myrrh and incense, and the altar was not drenched with the blood of bulls, which was the greatest abomination. The religious practice Empedocles defends consists in abstaining from slaughter and certain foods, purifying oneself and leading a pure life. In On Nature he adds a form of contemplation: if you fix these teachings in your firm mind and contemplate them with goodwill and pure meditation, they will stay with you all your life and grow. Purified rite and attention to doctrine form a single practice.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Può la ragione conoscere l'ultimo?

    The means of knowing are narrow: the Muse helps the mortal mind

    Fede e ragione si aiutanoLo dice espressamente

    Empedocles opens On Nature with a warning about human limits: narrow are the means of knowing spread through the limbs, many the miseries that blunt thought, and humans, having seen a small part of life, think they have found the whole. He asks the gods to turn madness from his tongue and the Muse to grant him what is lawful for ephemeral beings to hear. And he advises the disciple not to trust one sense more than another, but to consider each thing by every way it becomes evident. Observation, reasoning and divine inspiration cooperate in a knowledge aware of its limits, though it promises divine thoughts.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Ritirarsi dal mondo o trasformarlo?

    Physician, orator and democrat who refused kingship and toured the cities

    Impegnarsi nel mondoSi deduce dalla sua dottrina

    Empedocles lived in the midst of his city. According to Diogenes Laertius, drawing on Timaeus and Aristotle, he championed democracy in Acragas, helped dissolve an oligarchic assembly and refused the kingship offered to him; he was famed as a physician and Aristotle considered him the inventor of rhetoric. His own verses show him touring the cities, followed by thousands asking him the way to profit, oracles and remedies for disease. And the summit he promises the purified is not isolation but the callings that serve humans: seers, poets, physicians and leaders. Wisdom proves itself in service to the community.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri

Aneddoti e racconti

Aneddoti e racconti

Contestatoc. 434 a. C. (tradicional)

The bronze sandal of Etna

Empedocles, Hippobotus relates, got up and set off towards Etna as if to climb to the summit; on reaching the crater he threw himself in and vanished, so that he would be thought to have become a god. But the truth came out because the volcano cast up one of his sandals, which were of bronze. Heraclides of Pontus told it differently: after a sacrifice in the field of Peisianax the guests lay down to sleep, and at dawn Empedocles was gone; a servant had heard at midnight a very loud voice calling him and had seen a light in the sky, and Pausanias ordered the search abandoned and sacrifices made to him as to a god. Timaeus denied all of it: he went to the Peloponnese and never returned; Neanthes said he fell from his chariot and broke his thigh, and some showed his tomb at Megara.

Origine del racconto: Diogenes Laertius VIII 67–75, with the versions of Heraclides of Pontus, Hippobotus, Diodorus of Ephesus, Timaeus, Neanthes and Demetrius of Troezen. Horace (Ars poetica 463–466) fixed the Etna version. Ava Chitwood (2004) analyses how they derive from the poems.

Fonte: Chitwood, Ava. Death by Philosophy: The Biographical Tradition in the Life and Death of the Archaic Philosophers Empedocles, Heraclitus, and Democritus. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2004.

Racconto agiograficos. V a. C. (tradicional)

The breathless woman

Heraclides of Pontus wrote a dialogue, On the Woman without Breath, in which Empedocles explained to Pausanias the case of a woman who had gone thirty days without breathing or pulse, her body uncorrupted, and whom he had brought back to life. Hermippus gave the patient a name, Panthea of Acragas, given up by the doctors, and added that her cure was the occasion of the sacrifice after which Empedocles vanished. Burnet thought it was a case of hysterical suffocation and that the story drew on the lines where Empedocles promises his pupil the power to bring back from Hades the strength of a dead man (B111).

Origine del racconto: Diogenes Laertius VIII 60–61 and 67–69 (Heraclides of Pontus, Hermippus). Heraclides' treatise, lost, was a literary work of a medico-philosophical kind, not a clinical record.

Fonte: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres VIII 51–77 (Empédocles), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342); trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb, 1925 (Wikisource).

Non verificabiles. V a. C. (tradicional)

The wind-stopper

One year, Timaeus relates, the etesian winds blew so hard over Acragas that they ruined the crops. Empedocles had some asses flayed, had their skins sewn into bags and hung them on the hills and high places to catch the wind. The wind ceased, and from then on he was called *kolysanemas*, "wind-stopper". Plutarch tells a more sensible version: he blocked a gorge through which an unhealthy wind came down to the plain. The story refers to fragment 111, where Empedocles promises Pausanias that he will know how to halt the fury of the tireless winds and unleash them again, and perhaps to the mockery of some satirical poet.

Origine del racconto: Diogenes Laertius VIII 60 (Timaeus); Plutarch, Against Colotes 1126b and On Curiosity 515c. Burnet (Early Greek Philosophy, § 100) considers it deduced from B111.

Fonte: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres VIII 51–77 (Empédocles), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342); trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb, 1925 (Wikisource).

Tradizione oralec. 470–460 a. C.

The magistrate's banquet

One of the magistrates of Acragas invited Empedocles to dinner. The meal went on and no wine was served; the others said nothing, but Empedocles, indignant, demanded it be brought. The host replied that he was waiting for the council's secretary, and when he arrived made him master of the feast; the newcomer began to give orders like a tyrant and commanded that all should drink or have the wine poured over their heads. Empedocles said nothing. The next day he brought both before the court and had them condemned to death. "This," Timaeus concludes, "was the beginning of his political career." Later he opposed the physician Acron's obtaining a public plot for his father's tomb and dissolved the assembly of the Thousand.

Origine del racconto: Diogenes Laertius VIII 64–66, quoting Timaeus of Tauromenium (4th–3rd century BCE). Burnet (§ 99) considers them genuine local traditions gathered a century and a half later, though confused in their details.

Fonte: Burnet, John. Early Greek Philosophy, 2.ª ed. A. and C. Black, Londres, 1908, cap. V (Empedokles of Akragas), §§ 98–105 y traducción de los fragmentos (Project Gutenberg n.º 67097).

Testimonianzas. V a. C.

The refused crown

Aristotle, according to Diogenes Laertius, described Empedocles as a free man averse to all ambition to rule, so much so that he refused the kingship when it was offered to him, preferring a simple life. Xanthus of Lydia confirmed it. The contrast with the figure who presented himself as a god, with purple robe, golden girdle, bronze sandals and Delphic crown, already intrigued the ancients: Timaeus noted that his political views seemed at odds with the arrogance of his verses. Burnet resolved it by seeing in him the great democratic leader of Acragas and, at the same time, a religious preacher of the Pythagorean tradition.

Origine del racconto: Diogenes Laertius VIII 63 (Aristotle, probably in the Sophist; Xanthus) and VIII 73 (the attire). It is one of the few reports going back to Aristotle.

Fonte: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres VIII 51–77 (Empédocles), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342); trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb, 1925 (Wikisource).

Contestatos. V a. C. (tradicional)

The marshes of Selinus

The people of Selinus, Diodorus of Ephesus relates, suffered a plague caused by the stench of a nearby river: the men died and the women had difficult births. Empedocles, at his own expense, diverted two other rivers into it and, by mixing their waters, made it wholesome. When the Selinuntines were holding a feast on the bank, Empedocles appeared among them, and they rose and worshipped him as a god; to confirm that belief, the story adds, he threw himself into the fire. Burnet observed that coins of Selinus do commemorate the purification of the marshes, with the river god offering sacrifice, but doubted that the work was ascribed to Empedocles until a late date.

Origine del racconto: Diogenes Laertius VIII 70 (Diodorus of Ephesus). The Selinus coins showing the drainage (Head's Historia Numorum) prove the event, not Empedocles' involvement.

Fonte: Burnet, John. Early Greek Philosophy, 2.ª ed. A. and C. Black, Londres, 1908, cap. V (Empedokles of Akragas), §§ 98–105 y traducción de los fragmentos (Project Gutenberg n.º 67097).

Non verificabiles. V a. C. (tradicional)

Expelled by the Pythagoreans

Timaeus asserted that Empedocles had been a pupil of the Pythagoreans and was expelled from their meetings, as Plato later was, for "stealing discourses", that is, for divulging their doctrines. Neanthes added that until Philolaus and Empedocles the Pythagoreans admitted anyone, but that when Empedocles made their teachings public in verse they decreed to admit no poet. Diogenes Laertius also records some lines about "a man of extraordinary knowledge" which, according to some, refer to Pythagoras and, according to others, to Parmenides. The anecdote reflects a real affinity—transmigration, abstinence from meat, purification—but its form belongs to the repertoire of stories about Pythagorean secrecy.

Origine del racconto: Diogenes Laertius VIII 54–55 (Timaeus, Neanthes). Fragment B129 is quoted by Porphyry (Life of Pythagoras 30) and Iamblichus (On the Pythagorean Life 67) as referring to Pythagoras.

Fonte: Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres VIII 51–77 (Empédocles), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342); trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb, 1925 (Wikisource).

Insegnamenti

Insegnamenti

Le nozioni che articolano il suo pensiero, spiegate nel loro contesto.

The four roots (rhizomata)cuatro-raices
Empedocles accepts with Parmenides that nothing comes from what is not or is annihilated, but he does not give up explaining change. His solution is to posit four eternal and unchanging realities, the "roots of all things": fire, air (aither), water and earth. He names them after gods—shining Zeus, life-bringing Hera, Aidoneus and Nestis—and already in antiquity it was debated which god corresponded to which root (Aetius identifies Hera with air and Aidoneus with earth; Diogenes Laertius the reverse). No root turns into another: everything we call birth and death is mixture and separation, in different proportions, like the colours of a painter mixing pigments (B23). Plato called these principles "elements" (stoicheia), Aristotle adopted them adding the aither, and the theory, joined to humoral medicine, governed European science until modern chemistry.

Fragments B6, B8, B12, B17, B21, B23; reception in Aristotle, Metaphysics A 3–4.

Fonte: Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. y Schofield, M. The Presocratic Philosophers, 2.ª ed. Cambridge University Press, 1983, cap. X (Empedocles of Acragas). Trad. esp. de Jesús García Fernández, Gredos, 1987.

Love (Philotes) and Strife (Neikos)amor-y-discordia
To move the roots Empedocles introduces two powers, also eternal: Love, which he also calls Aphrodite, Cypris, Joy and Harmony, and which unites what is different; and Strife or Hate, which separates what is united. They are not abstract forces but realities that occupy a place among the roots, "equal in length and breadth" (B17.20), and their alternation is the law of the world. The Love that moves the cosmos is the same one men feel in their bodies, though no mortal has seen it whirling among the elements (B17.22–26). Aristotle considered Empedocles the first to posit two opposed causes of motion, though he complained that Love sometimes separates and Strife unites. Freud saw in this pair a precedent for his opposition between Eros and the death drive.

Fragments B17, B20, B22, B26, B35; Aristotle, Metaphysics A 4, 985a21–b4.

Fonte: Kingsley, K. Scarlett y Parry, Richard. «Empedocles». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta y Uri Nodelman; primera publicación el 26 de septiembre de 2019, revisión sustancial del 25 de septiembre de 2024.

The cosmic cycle and the Sphereciclo-cosmico
Under the complete dominion of Love all the roots merge into the Sphere (*Sphairos*), a round, uniform whole that "rejoices in its encircling solitude" (B27–B28), heir to Parmenides' sphere. When, at the time fixed by an oath, Strife enters its limbs, the Sphere breaks apart; Strife comes to separate the roots completely, and then Love gathers them again. The world we live in belongs to one of the intermediate phases. The "twofold tale" of B17 describes this double birth and double death of mortal things. Interpreters debate whether there are two cosmogonies per cycle—one under growing Love and another under growing Strife—or only one; the Strasbourg papyrus has added new lines to the debate without settling it.

Fragments B17, B26–B31, B35; Strasbourg papyrus, ensemble a.

Fonte: Martin, Alain y Primavesi, Oliver. L'Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666): introduction, édition et commentaire. Walter de Gruyter / Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg, Berlín, Nueva York y Estrasburgo, 1999.

The exiled daimon and transmigrationdaimon-y-transmigracion
The Purifications start from an "oracle of Necessity, an ancient decree of the gods": the daimon who stains himself with blood or forswears is banished for three times ten thousand seasons far from the blessed, and is born in every mortal form, rejected by air, sea, earth and sun (B115). "Of these I now am one," Empedocles declares, recalling that he has been boy, girl, bush, bird and fish (B117). The ethical consequence is stark: killing and eating animals is devouring one's kin, and sacrifice may be an unwitting parricide (B136–B137). The doctrine links with the Pythagoreanism and Orphism of Magna Graecia (Zuntz, Kingsley) and with the hope that the wise, purified, will be reborn as prophets, poets, physicians and princes, and finally as gods (B146–B147).

Fragments B112, B115, B117, B136–B137, B146–B147.

Fonte: Zuntz, Günther. Persephone: Three Essays on Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971.

Effluences and pores: perception and thoughtefluvios-y-poros
Empedocles explained perception with a theory that Plato attributes to Gorgias in the Meno: from all things flow effluences (*aporrhoai*) that enter the sense organs through pores of the right size. We know like by like: with earth we see earth, with water water, with love love (B109). The eye is like a lantern in which a fire enclosed in membranes goes out towards objects (B84). Breathing is explained by comparing the entry and exit of air through the skin's pores with a clepsydra, the perforated vessel a girl plays with (B100). Thought resides above all in the blood around the heart, because in it the roots are mixed in the most perfect proportion (B105). The theory shaped the physiology of the Sicilian medical school and reached Plato and Aristotle.

Fragments B84, B89, B100, B105, B109; Plato, Meno 76c–d; Theophrastus, On the Senses 7–24.

Fonte: Platón. Menón 76c–d (efluvios y poros); Sofista 242d–243a (las «musas sicilianas»). Trad. inglesa de Benjamin Jowett, 1892 (Project Gutenberg n.º 1643, Meno).

Zoogony: wandering limbs and combinationszoogonia
In one phase of the cycle the earth sent up loose limbs: heads without necks, arms without shoulders, eyes without foreheads (B57). Meeting by chance, they joined in every possible way, and monsters arose—oxen with human faces, men with oxen's heads, double-faced and double-breasted creatures (B61)—of which only those able to live and reproduce survived. Aristotle, in the Physics (II 8), discussed this explanation of adaptation without purpose and rejected it; in the nineteenth century it was read as a precedent of natural selection, and Darwin himself quoted the Aristotelian passage in a note to On the Origin of Species. The zoogony shows Empedocles' ambition: to explain life too from the roots and the two powers, without recourse to a plan.

Fragments B57–B62; Aristotle, Physics II 8, 198b29–32.

Fonte: Aristóteles. Metafísica A 3, 984a8–11, y A 4, 985a21–b4; Poética 1, 1447b17–20; Física II 8, 198b29–32; Sobre el alma I 2, 404b11–15; fragmentos del Sofista y de Sobre los poetas citados por Diógenes Laercio VIII 57 y 63. Trad. inglesa de W. D. Ross y otros (Internet Classics Archive, MIT).

Video

Video

Registrazioni, interviste e documentari. I video vengono riprodotti da YouTube; non sono ospitati qui.

  • Empedocles – Autobiography of a Demon

    Conferenza· EN· 2020· 19 min

    Jackman Humanities InstituteCanale ufficiale

  • HoP 011 - All You Need Is Love, and Five Other Things - Empedocles

    Conferenza· EN· 2020· 17 min

    history of philosophy without any gapsCanale ufficiale

  • 4) The Pluralists and The Sophists

    Conferenza· EN· 2016· 74 min

    Adam RosenfeldCanale ufficiale

  • 3-5 Empedocles

    Conferenza· EN· 2026· 12 min

    Nicholaos JonesCanale ufficiale

  • Aristotle, Metaphysics (Empedocles, love, and final causes) - Introduction to Philosophy

    Analisi· EN· 2013· 64 min

    Gregory B. Sadler - That Philosophy GuyCanale ufficiale

  • Empédocles de Agrigento

    Documentario· ES· 2018· 27 min

    UNEDCanale ufficiale

  • Conferencia David Hernández Castro "Empédocles"

    Conferenza· ES· 2018· 88 min

    Hercritia-Cátedra de Hermenéutica CríticaCanale ufficiale

  • Heráclito, Empédocles y Anaxágoras | Historia de la filosofía (7/61)

    Conferenza· ES· 2017· 68 min

    Ernesto CastroCanale ufficiale

  • EMPÉDOCLE – De l'un au multiple - Sur les traces du présocratique (France Culture, 1997)

    Documentario· FR· 1997· 85 min

    ÉCLAIR BRUT

  • EMPÉDOCLE d'Agrigente – Un présocratique en terre arabe (France Culture, 2007)

    Intervista· FR· 2007· 46 min

    ÉCLAIR BRUT

Galleria

Galleria

Immagini con licenza verificata. Ciascuna conserva la sua paternità e la sua attribuzione.

Manoscritti

Manoscritti

Testimoni manoscritti e testi antichi, con il loro custode e le loro condizioni di consultazione.

  • GRC · Escritura libraria griega sobre papiro · Poema compuesto en el s. V a. C.; copia de finales del s. I d. C.

    P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666

    Testimone conservato
    Fragmentos de un rollo de papiro (52 según los editores), con restos de unos 74 versos
    Custode
    Bibliothèque nationale et universitaire de Strasbourg · P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666
    Digitalizzazione
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Empedokles_fragm…
Manoscritti →

Relazioni

Relazioni

Influenze, discepolati e affinità. Si distingue la relazione documentata dalla somiglianza individuata per analisi.

  • Ricevette l'influenza di

    Parmenides

    Theophrastus calls him an "emulator and imitator" of Parmenides (Diogenes Laertius VIII 55); he accepts that nothing comes to be or perishes and writes, like him, in hexameters.

    Relazione documentata

  • Ricevette l'influenza di

    Pythagoras

    Timaeus and Neanthes make him a pupil of the Pythagoreans; Porphyry and Iamblichus refer the praise of B129 to Pythagoras. He shares with Pythagoreanism transmigration and abstinence from meat.

    Relazione documentata

  • Ricevette l'influenza di

    Jenófanes

    Hermippus, according to Diogenes Laertius (VIII 56), considered him an imitator of Xenophanes, with whom he supposedly lived; the report is isolated.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Contemporaneo di

    Anaxágoras

    Aristotle (Metaphysics A 3, 984a11) says Anaxagoras was older than Empedocles but later in his works; both explain change as mixture.

    Relazione documentata

  • Contemporaneo di

    Zenón de Elea

    Alcidamas, according to Diogenes Laertius (VIII 56), made them fellow pupils of Parmenides.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Maestro di

    Gorgias de Leontinos

    Satyrus, probably following Alcidamas, makes him Empedocles' pupil (Diogenes Laertius VIII 58); Plato ascribes to Gorgias the Empedoclean theory of effluences (Meno 76c).

    Relazione documentata

  • Maestro di

    Pausanias de Gela

    Physician, pupil and beloved of Empedocles, addressee of On Nature (B1).

    Relazione documentata

  • Influenzò

    Plato

    He alludes to the "Sicilian muses" (Sophist 242d–243a), ascribes his theory of effluences to Gorgias (Meno 76c) and adopts the four elements in the Timaeus.

    Relazione documentata

  • Influenzò

    Aristotle

    He adopts the four roots as elements, calls him the inventor of rhetoric and discusses his zoogony (Physics II 8) and his causes (Metaphysics A 4).

    Relazione documentata

  • Influenzò

    Lucrecio

    In De rerum natura (I 716–733) he praises him as Sicily's most admirable man and takes from him the model of the physical poem.

    Relazione documentata

  • Idee affini a

    Heraclitus

    The alternation of Love and Strife extends, in another key, the Heraclitean tension between harmony and war.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Idee affini a

    Mahāvīra

    Approximate contemporaries: the doctrine of transmigration through all living forms and the refusal to kill animals bring the Purifications close to Jain ethics, without known historical contact.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Influenzò

    Sigmund Freud

    In Analysis Terminable and Interminable (1937) he recognises in Empedocles' Love and Strife a precedent of his theory of Eros and the death drive.

    Relazione documentata

Fonti

Fonti

Bibliografia e cataloghi consultati per questa scheda.

  1. Open Library (Internet Archive): ediciones de los fragmentos de Empédocles verificadas por ISBN.
  2. Wikidata, entidad Q83375 «Empedocles» (107 enlaces entre wikis; P31=Q5). Registra varios años de nacimiento (494, 492, 490 a. C.) y de muerte (444, 434, 432, 430 a. C.), Acragante como lugar de nacimiento y el Etna o el Peloponeso como lugar de muerte.
  3. Diógenes Laercio. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres VIII 51–77 (Empédocles), s. III d. C. Trad. inglesa de C. D. Yonge, Bohn, Londres, 1853 (Project Gutenberg n.º 57342); trad. inglesa de R. D. Hicks, Loeb, 1925 (Wikisource).
  4. Diels, Hermann y Kranz, Walther. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6.ª ed. Weidmann, Berlín, 1951–1952, cap. 31 (Empedokles), A (testimonios) y B 1–154.
  5. Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. y Schofield, M. The Presocratic Philosophers, 2.ª ed. Cambridge University Press, 1983, cap. X (Empedocles of Acragas). Trad. esp. de Jesús García Fernández, Gredos, 1987.
  6. Kingsley, K. Scarlett y Parry, Richard. «Empedocles». The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta y Uri Nodelman; primera publicación el 26 de septiembre de 2019, revisión sustancial del 25 de septiembre de 2024.
  7. Burnet, John. Early Greek Philosophy, 2.ª ed. A. and C. Black, Londres, 1908, cap. V (Empedokles of Akragas), §§ 98–105 y traducción de los fragmentos (Project Gutenberg n.º 67097).
  8. Martin, Alain y Primavesi, Oliver. L'Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666): introduction, édition et commentaire. Walter de Gruyter / Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg, Berlín, Nueva York y Estrasburgo, 1999.
  9. Laks, André y Most, Glenn W. (eds. y trads.). Early Greek Philosophy, vol. V: Western Greek Thinkers, Part 2. Loeb Classical Library 528, Harvard University Press, 2016.
  10. Inwood, Brad. The Poem of Empedocles: A Text and Translation with an Introduction, ed. revisada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2001 (1.ª ed. 1992).
  11. Wright, M. R. Empedocles: The Extant Fragments. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1981 (reed. Bristol Classical Press, 1995).
  12. Chitwood, Ava. Death by Philosophy: The Biographical Tradition in the Life and Death of the Archaic Philosophers Empedocles, Heraclitus, and Democritus. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2004.
  13. Aristóteles. Metafísica A 3, 984a8–11, y A 4, 985a21–b4; Poética 1, 1447b17–20; Física II 8, 198b29–32; Sobre el alma I 2, 404b11–15; fragmentos del Sofista y de Sobre los poetas citados por Diógenes Laercio VIII 57 y 63. Trad. inglesa de W. D. Ross y otros (Internet Classics Archive, MIT).
  14. Kingsley, Peter. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.
  15. Zuntz, Günther. Persephone: Three Essays on Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971.
  16. Lucrecio. De rerum natura I 716–733 (elogio de Empédocles), s. I a. C.
  17. Horacio. Arte poética 463–466 («deus immortalis haberi / dum cupit Empedocles, ardentem frigidus Aetnam / insiluit»).
  18. Hölderlin, Friedrich. Der Tod des Empedokles (tres versiones, 1797–1800); Arnold, Matthew, Empedocles on Etna, and Other Poems, B. Fellowes, Londres, 1852 (Internet Archive).
  19. Leonard, William Ellery (trad.). The Fragments of Empedocles, Translated into English Verse. Open Court, Chicago, 1908 (Internet Archive).
  20. Fairbanks, Arthur (ed. y trad.). The First Philosophers of Greece. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, Londres, 1898, cap. X (Empedokles), texto griego según la edición de H. Stein (1852) (Project Gutenberg n.º 78670).
  21. «Empedocles», Wikipedia en inglés, y «Empédocles», Wikipedia en español (consultadas para contrastar datos y bibliografía; texto propio).
  22. De Smet, Daniel. Empedocles Arabus. Une lecture néoplatonicienne tardive. Paleis der Academiën (Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België), Bruselas, 1998.
  23. Eggers Lan, Conrado (dir.), Cordero, Néstor Luis, Olivieri, Francisco J., La Croce, Ernesto y Santa Cruz, María Isabel. Los filósofos presocráticos II. Biblioteca Clásica Gredos 24, Gredos, Madrid, 1979 (Empédocles, trad. de Ernesto La Croce).
  24. Bollack, Jean. Empédocle, 3 vols. (4 tomos). Éditions de Minuit, París, 1965–1969; reed. Gallimard (Tel), 1992.
  25. Platón. Menón 76c–d (efluvios y poros); Sofista 242d–243a (las «musas sicilianas»). Trad. inglesa de Benjamin Jowett, 1892 (Project Gutenberg n.º 1643, Meno).
  26. Galeno. De methodo medendi I 1 (X 5–6 Kühn): la escuela médica itálica de Filistión, Empédocles y Pausanias.
  27. Primavesi, Oliver. Empedokles Physika I: eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs. Archiv für Papyrusforschung, Beiheft 22, Walter de Gruyter, Berlín, 2008.
  28. Osborne, Catherine. «Empedocles Recycled». The Classical Quarterly, 37 (1987), pp. 24–50; y Trépanier, Simon, Empedocles: An Interpretation, Routledge, Nueva York, 2004.
  29. Freud, Sigmund. «Die endliche und die unendliche Analyse». Internationale Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse, 23 (1937), sección VI (Empédocles, el Amor y la Discordia).
Titolare dei diritti
Textos antiguos en dominio público; cada traducción y edición crítica pertenece a su traductor o editorial

In attesa di conferma

Ciò che questa scheda non ha ancora potuto chiarire. Preferiamo dirlo piuttosto che riempirlo.

  • Fechas: se adopta c. 494–434 a. C. (muerte a los sesenta años según Aristóteles y actividad posterior al 472, Burnet); Apolodoro situaba la madurez en 444–443 y Wikidata registra varios años alternativos.
  • Ediciones españolas específicas de Empédocles (aparte de Gredos, Kirk-Raven-Schofield y Bernabé): no verificadas en catálogo en esta sesión (la API de Google Books agotó su cuota).
  • «La esfera» pseudoempedoclea: verificar la edición de 1898 (probablemente E. Maass, Commentariorum in Aratum reliquiae) antes de citarla con detalle.
  • Papiro de Estrasburgo: comprobar si la BNU de Estrasburgo ofrece digitalización completa y sus condiciones; fecha exacta de adquisición (1904 o 1905).
  • Texto griego de las citas tomado de Fairbanks (edición de Stein, 1852); cotejar con Diels-Kranz (diferencias menores señaladas en B6 y B117).
  • Vídeos: diez verificados; faltan clases universitarias en español dedicadas monográficamente al papiro de Estrasburgo.
  • Programas de afiliación: ninguno verificado. Lista vacía.
  • Año de los vídeos: el de la grabación cuando la descripción lo indica y, si no, el de publicación en YouTube.

Ricerca effettuata il 2026-10-25