Aller au contenu
The ConsciousLibrary

Théosophie · Quatrième Voie

P. D. Ouspensky

Пётр Демьянович Успенский

1878 – 1947Personne historiquement documentée

Piotr Demianovitch Ouspensky (1878-1947), journaliste et penseur russe, passa des spéculations sur la quatrième dimension (Tertium Organum, 1912) au rôle de grand exposant de l'enseignement de G. I. Gurdjieff, auprès de qui il travailla de 1915 à 1924. De Londres, puis du New Jersey, il enseigna pendant vingt-cinq ans la « Quatrième Voie » à des groupes d'où sortirent des disciples comme Maurice Nicoll ou Rodney Collin. Les Fragments d'un enseignement inconnu, parus après sa mort, demeurent l'exposé le plus clair de ce système.

œuvres
17œuvres
éditions
42éditions
citations
8citations
vidéos
11vidéos
images
3images
Placa azul de P. D. Ouspensky en Colet House

Placa azul de P. D. Ouspensky en Colet House · CC BY-SA 4.0

Dans ses propres mots

«Man does not know himself.»

The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution, primera conferencia

Son idée centrale

Ordinary man does not 'do': everything happens to him, just as wars and revolutions happen to nations. Only one who has achieved inner unity and consciousness can act in the proper sense.

Biographie

4 min de lecture

Traduction assistée à partir de l'original espagnol, en attente de relecture par un traducteur natif.

Un autodidacte dans le Moscou du tournant du siècle

Piotr Demianovitch Ouspensky naquit à Moscou en mars 1878, dans une famille de fonctionnaires d'origine modeste : son père servait dans l'administration du cadastre et à l'Hospice des enfants trouvés ; sa mère était fille de marchand. Les sources divergent sur le jour exact, car le calendrier julien était encore en vigueur en Russie. Il étudia au Deuxième Gymnase de Moscou, dont il fut renvoyé vers l'âge de seize ans — rapporte la tradition biographique — pour avoir griffonné une inscription sur un mur sous les yeux d'un inspecteur. Dès lors il se forma seul, avec une passion précoce pour les mathématiques, la psychologie et les phénomènes que la science de son temps laissait de côté.

Journaliste et chercheur

Dans les premières années du siècle, il travailla comme journaliste à Moscou et à Saint-Pétersbourg. Vers 1907, il découvrit la théosophie, alors en pleine expansion en Russie, et en 1908 il entreprit un premier voyage en Orient. L'année suivante, il publia La Quatrième Dimension, une brochure redevable à Charles Howard Hinton, où la quatrième dimension est une extension de l'espace que notre perception ne saisit pas. De cette intuition naquit Tertium Organum (1912), sa première grande œuvre : un « troisième canon de la pensée », après l'Organon d'Aristote et le Novum Organum de Bacon, qui nie la réalité ultime de l'espace et du temps et propose une logique supérieure dans laquelle A est à la fois A et non-A. À la même époque, il publia un essai sur le symbolisme du tarot, deux conférences sur le « cercle intérieur » et le surhomme, une brochure sur le yoga, des Conversations avec le diable et le roman Kinemadrama, qui deviendrait L'Étrange Vie d'Ivan Ossokine.

En 1913-1914, il se rendit en Égypte, en Inde et à Ceylan à la recherche d'une école vivante de connaissance ésotérique ; il visita le siège théosophique d'Adyar, mais le déclenchement de la Première Guerre mondiale l'obligea à rentrer sans l'avoir trouvée. Au printemps 1915, il donna à Saint-Pétersbourg et à Moscou des conférences sur ses voyages qu'il intitulait, précisément, À la recherche du miraculeux.

La rencontre avec Gurdjieff

La même année, après avoir décliné plusieurs invitations, il accepta de rencontrer dans un petit café de Moscou un homme au type oriental, à la moustache noire et au regard perçant, qui lui parut « déguisé » : Georges Ivanovitch Gurdjieff. La conversation changea sa vie. Au cours des années suivantes, Ouspensky fit partie du groupe de Saint-Pétersbourg, prit des notes minutieuses des explications du maître sur l'homme-machine, les centres, la loi de trois et celle de sept, l'ennéagramme et le « rappel de soi », et vécut des expériences qu'il relaterait avec une sobriété scrupuleuse, comme la communication télépathique qu'il dit avoir eue avec Gurdjieff en Finlande en août 1916.

La révolution dispersa le groupe. Ouspensky suivit Gurdjieff à Essentouki en 1917, prit ses distances avec lui en 1918 et survécut à la guerre civile dans le sud de la Russie ; de là, il envoya les chroniques qu'A. R. Orage publia à Londres et qui seraient réunies sous le titre Lettres de Russie, 1919. En 1920, il trouva refuge à Constantinople.

Londres et l'indépendance

Entre-temps, Tertium Organum avait atteint les États-Unis : l'architecte Claude Bragdon le traduisit avec Nicholas Bessaraboff et le publia en 1920, et son succès fit d'un émigré inconnu un auteur célèbre. Avec le soutien de Lady Rothermere, Ouspensky s'installa à Londres en 1921 ; ses conférences y attirèrent écrivains, médecins et journalistes, et les sources citent parmi ses auditeurs Aldous Huxley, T. S. Eliot et Gerald Heard. Il aida à réunir des fonds pour que Gurdjieff puisse ouvrir son Institut à Fontainebleau, mais en 1924 il annonça qu'il poursuivrait seul. Dans le dernier chapitre des Fragments, il explique sa décision par une phrase d'une rare noblesse : la voie de Gurdjieff pouvait être plus juste que la sienne, mais ce n'était pas la sienne.

Pendant quinze ans, il enseigna à Londres — à partir de 1938 également à Colet House — et à Lyne Place (Surrey), où ses groupes associaient l'étude des idées à un travail pratique. En 1931 parut Un nouveau modèle de l'univers, qui rassemblait et développait les essais écrits avant Gurdjieff. Parmi ses disciples figurèrent Maurice Nicoll, Kenneth Walker, Robert S. de Ropp, Rodney Collin et, pendant un temps, J. G. Bennett.

Les États-Unis et la fin

La Seconde Guerre mondiale le conduisit aux États-Unis en 1941 ; il s'y installa avec son épouse, Sofia Grigorievna, dans une ferme du New Jersey et continua de donner des causeries à New York. Gravement malade, il rentra seul en Angleterre en 1947. Lors des réunions de ces mois-là, il déconcerta ses élèves en insistant pour qu'ils recommencent depuis le début et ne se fient pas au « système » appris ; Rodney Collin en conclut qu'il avait abandonné l'enseignement, lecture que les comptes rendus de ces réunions ne confirment pas clairement. Il mourut à Lyne Place le 2 octobre 1947 et repose dans le cimetière de l'église de la Sainte-Trinité de Lyne.

Une œuvre en deux temps

Peu après sa mort parurent les Fragments d'un enseignement inconnu — avec l'aval, selon la tradition, de Gurdjieff lui-même — et L'Homme et son évolution possible, cinq conférences conçues comme une introduction. Suivirent Le Quatrième Chemin (1957) et plusieurs recueils de réunions. L'œuvre d'Ouspensky connaît ainsi deux temps : celui du penseur qui cherchait une logique au-delà du sens commun, et celui du disciple qui mit par écrit, avec une précision de journaliste, l'enseignement d'un autre. La clarté de cette transcription explique que la Quatrième Voie soit aujourd'hui encore connue surtout à travers sa voix. Ses papiers sont conservés à la bibliothèque de l'université Yale.

Sources: Ouspensky, P. D. In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1949; Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950. · Ouspensky, P. D. The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution. Nueva York: Hedgehog Press, 1950. · Lachman, Gary. In Search of P. D. Ouspensky: The Genius in the Shadow of Gurdjieff. Wheaton: Quest Books, 2004. · Webb, James. The Harmonious Circle: The Lives and Work of G. I. Gurdjieff, P. D. Ouspensky, and Their Followers. Nueva York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1980. · Ouspensky, P. D. Tertium Organum: The Third Canon of Thought, a Key to the Enigmas of the World. Trad. de Nicholas Bessaraboff y Claude Bragdon. Rochester (NY): Manas Press, 1920.

Chronologie

La vie, année après année

Chaque point est un événement documenté. Cliquez pour le lire, avec sa source et son degré de certitude.

  1. mars 1878 · 0 ans

    Born in Moscow

    Pyotr Demyanovich Uspensky is born, son of Demyan Petrovich Uspensky, an official, and Ekaterina Semyonovna Borisova. Sources give 4, 5 or 17 March, depending on the calendar used.

    Documenté

  2. v. 1894 · 16 ans

    Expelled from the gymnasium

    He is expelled from the Second Moscow Gymnasium, tradition says for graffiti painted in view of an inspector. From then on he is self-taught.

    Probable

  3. 1907 · 29 ans

    Journalism and Theosophy

    He works as a journalist on the Moscow daily Utro (The Morning) and discovers Theosophy, which will shape his first books.

    Documenté

  4. 1909 · 31 ans

    The Fourth Dimension

    He publishes his first book, on theories of the fourth dimension.

    Documenté

  5. 1912 · 34 ans

    Tertium Organum

    Tertium Organum appears, his first major work, proposing a higher logic and a theory of cosmic consciousness.

    Documenté

  6. 1913 – 1914

    Journey to the East

    He travels to Egypt, India and Ceylon in search of an esoteric school; he visits Adyar. The war forces him back to Russia.

    Documenté

  7. février 1915 · 36 ans

    Lectures 'In Search of the Miraculous'

    In February and March he lectures in St Petersburg on his travels under the titles 'In Search of the Miraculous' and 'The Problems of Death'.

    Documenté

  8. 1915 · 37 ans

    Meeting Gurdjieff

    In a small Moscow café he meets G. I. Gurdjieff and joins his work group.

    Documenté

  9. août 1916 · 38 ans

    The Finland experiences

    By his own account he has telepathic communication with Gurdjieff at a Finnish country house. He himself admits he cannot prove it.

    Contesté

  10. 1918 · 40 ans

    First separation from Gurdjieff

    Having followed him to the Caucasus, he decides to leave Gurdjieff and continue the work independently.

    Documenté

  11. 1919 · 41 ans

    Letters from Russia

    During the civil war he sends dispatches that A. R. Orage publishes in London in The New Age.

    Documenté

  12. 1920 · 42 ans

    Exile in Constantinople; Tertium Organum in English

    A refugee in Constantinople, he is unaware that in Rochester Claude Bragdon has published Tertium Organum in English with great success.

    Documenté

  13. août 1921 · 43 ans

    Arrival in London

    He leaves Constantinople in August and settles in London with Lady Rothermere's support; he begins lecturing.

    Documenté

  14. 1924 · 46 ans

    Final break with Gurdjieff

    He announces in London that he will continue teaching independently, apart from Gurdjieff and his Fontainebleau Institute.

    Documenté

  15. 1931 · 53 ans

    A New Model of the Universe

    The collection of his pre-Gurdjieff essays is published in English.

    Documenté

  16. 1938 · 60 ans

    Colet House

    He teaches at Colet House, later the home of The Study Society, where a blue plaque now commemorates him.

    Documenté

  17. 1941 · 63 ans

    Move to the United States

    Because of the war he moves to the United States; with his wife Sophia Grigorievna he settles on a New Jersey farm and lectures in New York.

    Probable

  18. 2 octobre 1947 · 69 ans

    Death at Lyne Place

    Having returned to England that year, he dies at Lyne Place. He is buried in Holy Trinity churchyard, Lyne.

    Documenté

  19. 1949

    In Search of the Miraculous published

    In Search of the Miraculous is published posthumously and becomes the standard account of Gurdjieff's system.

    Documenté

Œuvres

Œuvres essentielles

Les œuvres sans lesquelles on ne comprend pas son héritage.

Tertium Organum: A Key to the Enigmas of the World — P. D. Ouspensky

Œuvre écrite · 1912

Tertium Organum: A Key to the Enigmas of the World

Tertium Organum. Ключ к загадкам мира

His first major work: after Aristotle's Organon and Bacon's Novum Organum, it proposes a 'third canon of thought' that denies the ultimate reality of space and time, explores cosmic consciousness (Bucke, the mystics) and formulates a higher logic in which A is both A and not-A. It was a success in America in the 1920s.

4 éditions · amazon.com

A New Model of the Universe — P. D. Ouspensky

Œuvre écrite · 1931

A New Model of the Universe

A collection of essays on esotericism, the fourth dimension, the superman, Christianity and the New Testament, the Tarot, yoga, dreams, eternal recurrence, sex and evolution, unified by the 'psychological method': examining each problem from the level of consciousness of the one who thinks it.

4 éditions · amazon.com

In Search of the Miraculous — P. D. Ouspensky

Œuvre posthume · 1949

In Search of the Miraculous

In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching

A first-person chronicle of the years with Gurdjieff in Moscow, St Petersburg and the Caucasus and a systematic account of his teaching: man as a machine, the seven categories of man, the centres, self-remembering, the laws of three and seven, the ray of creation, the enneagram. It is the standard introduction to the Fourth Way.

7 éditions · amazon.fr

The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution — P. D. Ouspensky

Conférences publiées · 1950

The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution

The five lectures Ouspensky read to newcomers: man does not know himself, is a machine capable of knowing it, lives in lower states of consciousness and can evolve only through conscious work on himself. It is the shortest and clearest gateway to his teaching.

4 éditions · amazon.com

Citations

Citations localisées dans une œuvre précise. Chacune porte sa provenance et son degré de fiabilité.

Man does not know himself.

VérifiéeThe Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution, primera conferencia

1 / 8

Idées essentielles (résumé éditorial)

Par respect du droit d'auteur, ces idées sont résumées avec nos propres mots et ne sont pas présentées comme des citations littérales.

  • Ordinary man does not 'do': everything happens to him, just as wars and revolutions happen to nations. Only one who has achieved inner unity and consciousness can act in the proper sense.
  • There are four possible states of consciousness — sleep, ordinary waking state, self-consciousness and objective consciousness — and man lives almost always in the first two while believing he has the last two.
  • Human evolution is neither automatic nor collective: it is an individual possibility requiring knowledge, conscious effort and the guidance of a school.
  • Time is the way we imperfectly perceive a higher dimension of space; hence the possibility that life recurs, an idea he dramatised in Strange Life of Ivan Osokin.
  • Every great question of science, religion or art should be examined with a 'psychological method', asking from what level of consciousness it is posed.

Dernières paroles

Il n'existe aucun témoignage vérifiable de ses dernières paroles.

There is no reliable record of his last words. Accounts of his final months — notably Rodney Collin's and the records of the 1947 meetings — report his insistence that pupils 'start again', but transmit no verifiable final words.

Interroger

Ce que répond son œuvre

Douze grandes questions de l'humanité et ce que ses textes permettent d'y répondre, références à l'appui. Nous ne lui prêtons jamais de paroles.

  • Qu'est-ce que l'Absolu ? Dieu existe-t-il ?

    At the top of the ray of creation, the Absolute, subject to one law

    Un Absolu impersonnelCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    P. D. Ouspensky approached the Absolute in two stages. In Tertium Organum (1912), before meeting Gurdjieff, he speculates on higher dimensions of space and on a cosmic consciousness the human being may attain, without appealing to a personal God. In In Search of the Miraculous (1949), where he records what he learned from Gurdjieff, he sets out the ray of creation: a scale of worlds descending from the Absolute, subject to one law, down to the Moon, subject to ninety-six; each level is more mechanical the further it is from the source. The Absolute appears there as the principle from which everything proceeds and whose will reaches directly only the first level, not as someone with whom one has dealings. His interest is not devotional but cosmological and psychological: to understand where the human being stands on that scale.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qui suis-je ? Existe-t-il un vrai soi ?

    Man has no permanent I, only many I's taking turns

    Il n'y a pas de soi permanentIl le dit expressément

    P. D. Ouspensky sets out in In Search of the Miraculous (1949) and The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution (1950) the central thesis of the Fourth Way: the ordinary human being has no single, permanent I. Each thought, desire or sensation says «I» for a moment and is replaced by another; there are hundreds of small I's, often contradictory, taking turns in command without any of them representing the whole. Man in this state is a machine: everything happens to him, he does nothing. Self-observation reveals this multiplicity, and seeing it is the first step. Unlike Buddhist non-self, however, the teaching holds that a real I can come to be formed through long and conscious work; the point is not to discover a Self already given but to create what does not yet exist.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi souffrons-nous ?

    We suffer from identification, imagination and needless negative emotions

    L'ignorance de ce que nous sommesIl le dit expressément

    P. D. Ouspensky sets out in The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution (1950) and The Fourth Way (1957) a psychological explanation of suffering. Ordinary man lives asleep: he identifies with every thought, emotion or circumstance, loses himself in it and believes he is that. To identification are added imagination, which produces uncontrolled scenarios, and the expression of negative emotions, which Ouspensky regards as unnecessary: they have no centre of their own in the organism, are maintained by habit and justified by reasoning. Much human suffering, he holds, comes from this mechanical functioning, which passes for natural. Self-observation, non-identification and ceasing to express negative emotions make it possible to reduce it. The teaching further distinguishes this useless mechanical suffering from the conscious suffering that work on oneself may demand.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Que se passe-t-il après la mort ?

    Life repeats itself: eternal recurrence, which only consciousness can change

    Renaissance selon le karmaIl le dit expressément

    Ouspensky defended throughout his life an idea of his own, eternal recurrence, which he sets out in A New Model of the Universe and fictionalises in Strange Life of Ivan Osokin. At death, the human being does not pass into another world or a different body: he is born again into the same life, at the same time and with the same circumstances, because time has more dimensions than we perceive. Most people repeat the same things mechanically; only someone who acquires memory and self-consciousness can introduce changes into the repetition. In In Search of the Miraculous he also records Gurdjieff's doctrine: ordinary man does not have an immortal soul already given, but the possibility of forming higher bodies through work, and only what has crystallised can survive the death of the body.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Comment atteint-on la libération ou le salut ?

    Man is a sleeping machine; awakening requires self-remembering within a school

    Par un travail intérieur conscientIl le dit expressément

    Peter D. Ouspensky sets out in In Search of the Miraculous the teaching he received from Gurdjieff between 1915 and 1918, and in The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution the version he himself taught. The starting point is that ordinary human beings live asleep: each is a machine moved by external influences, without a permanent «I» but with a multitude of small I's succeeding one another. Evolution is neither automatic nor guaranteed; it is only possible for those who undertake it consciously. Its tools are self-observation, «self-remembering», effort against mechanicalness and work with others within a school, because no one can awaken alone. The end of that development is higher states of consciousness.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Faut-il un maître ?

    No one awakens alone: a school is needed, with its system and group work

    La communauté et la traditionIl le dit expressément

    In In Search of the Miraculous, Peter D. Ouspensky transmitted the idea, received from Gurdjieff, that a sleeping man cannot wake himself: he needs a system of knowledge and other people to remind him of his sleep. That is the reason for schools, organised groups working with rules, with knowledge coming from a higher source and with common tasks. After separating from Gurdjieff in 1918 and definitively in the 1920s, Ouspensky led his own groups in London for decades, centred on studying the system. His emphasis falls more on the school and collective work than on the personal figure of the teacher.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Le monde est-il réel ?

    The ray of creation: worlds of differing density and number of laws

    Des plans d'existenceIl le dit expressément

    In In Search of the Miraculous, Peter D. Ouspensky sets out the cosmology he received from Gurdjieff: the ray of creation, a scale of worlds running from the Absolute to the Moon through all worlds, our galaxy, the Sun, the planets and the Earth. Each level is subject to an increasing number of laws, so that the Earth, subject to many, is a place of great mechanicalness. Human beings live in one of the worst places in the universe, in the system's expression, and their possible evolution consists in freeing themselves from some of those laws. Before meeting Gurdjieff, in Tertium Organum, he had already argued that the three-dimensional world is a limited perception of a reality of more dimensions.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qu'est-ce que l'amour ?

    Love is a cosmic phenomenon that can open onto higher consciousness

    Le désir ardent et l'unionCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    In Tertium Organum, P. D. Ouspensky treats love as a cosmic phenomenon not made to the measure of human ends: people use it for reproduction, pleasure or possession, but its nature exceeds all of that and belongs to an order of reality of higher dimensions. That is why, he holds, love can momentarily open a higher perception, akin to the mystical consciousness he studies in the same book, and also why it is degraded when shut up in the personal. In A New Model of the Universe, in the chapter on sex and evolution, he examines sexual energy as a force that can serve inner evolution or be wasted. Later, within the Fourth Way, he would add that mechanical man cannot truly love as long as he lacks a permanent I.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Sommes-nous libres ou tout est-il déterminé ?

    Man is a machine: everything happens to him, he does nothing

    Nous sommes des machines jusqu'à l'éveilIl le dit expressément

    *In Search of the Miraculous* (1949) records as the starting point of Gurdjieff's teaching the thesis that ordinary man is a machine: he cannot do, everything happens to him, as it rains or clears up. Ouspensky makes it the axis of his own lectures, published as *The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution*: the human being has no single permanent self but many small «I»s that take turns, and therefore has no will. Freedom is not a given but a possibility. Only through work on oneself, beginning with self-remembering, can a centre capable of doing be formed. Most people, he warns, will never leave mechanicalness.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi méditer ou prier ?

    Self-remembering: being present to oneself while acting

    Être présentIl le dit expressément

    In the Fourth Way Ouspensky sets out in *In Search of the Miraculous* and *The Fourth Way*, the central practice is neither sitting meditation nor prayer but self-remembering: dividing attention so that, while looking at something, one is at the same time aware of oneself looking. Ouspensky recounts that when he tried it he discovered he almost never remembered himself and that most of his life passed in sleep. To that effort are added non-judgemental self-observation and the struggle against identification and the expression of negative emotions. The aim is to wake from mechanicalness and form a permanent self; self-remembering is the first step towards consciousness.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • La raison peut-elle connaître l'ultime ?

    A higher logic and a school knowledge ordinary science cannot reach

    Une connaissance ésotériqueIl le dit expressément

    Ouspensky trained as a mathematician and journalist, and his first answer was intellectual: in *Tertium Organum* (1912) he proposed a «third logic» to surpass those of Aristotle and Bacon in order to think about consciousness and the higher dimensions of space. Meeting Gurdjieff in 1915 convinced him that something more was needed: an esoteric knowledge preserved by schools, which, according to *In Search of the Miraculous*, is not transmitted through books but from teacher to pupil, and only to one who has prepared his being to receive it. That knowledge must be verified personally: nothing is to be accepted on faith. The ordinary, mechanical intellect cannot reach it; one developed by work on oneself can.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Se retirer du monde ou le transformer ?

    The Fourth Way requires no withdrawal: one works in ordinary life

    La contemplation dans l'actionIl le dit expressément

    In In Search of the Miraculous, P. D. Ouspensky sets out Gurdjieff's classification of the traditional ways: that of the fakir, who works on the body; that of the monk, on the emotions; and that of the yogi, on the mind. All three require leaving ordinary life and withdrawing. The Fourth Way, by contrast, does not ask one to go to the desert or the monastery: it is followed in the conditions of ordinary life, which are considered the best possible for work on oneself, and it works at once on body, emotions and mind. The practitioner keeps his trade and his family, but uses them as material for self-remembering and for observing his mechanicalness. Ouspensky led groups for decades, in London and later in the United States, on this basis. As for society, he was sceptical: collective changes, he said, happen mechanically.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres

Affinités et tensions

Affinités et tensions

Calculées question par question à partir de ses positions. La raison de chaque accord ou de chaque désaccord s'affiche d'un clic.

Ils s'opposent surContradiction apparente

P. D. Ouspensky · Ramana Maharshi

Many I's or a single Self: the same word for two levels

Ouspensky holds in In Search of the Miraculous and The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution that ordinary man has no permanent I: every thought or desire says I for a moment and is replaced by another. Ramana holds that what one is, the Self, is the only permanent reality (Who Am I?). The opposition seems head-on. But what Ouspensky describes, a succession of small I's identified with each impulse, is almost literally what Ramana calls the ego: the thought “I” that attaches itself to every object and takes itself for the body. Both agree that the everyday self is unstable and that seeing this clearly is the first step; and both call for an attention turned towards oneself, self-remembering in one, enquiry in the other.

Pourquoi: The contradiction is apparent at the level of diagnosis because they use the word I for different levels: Ouspensky calls I's the psychological states of ordinary man; Ramana reserves the term Self for the awareness that witnesses them all, which is neither a state nor a content. Ramana's ego and Ouspensky's many I's are the same reality seen from two systems. There is a real difference in the goal: the Fourth Way aims to build a permanent I through work, whereas for Ramana the Self is not built but recognised. One starts from a psychology of the machine; the other, from a Vedantic metaphysics.

Ils concordent sur

P. D. Ouspensky · G. I. Gurdjieff

Man is a machine: the master and the disciple who systematised his teaching

They share the thesis that defines the Fourth Way: ordinary man is a machine, he cannot do, everything happens to him, and he lacks a single I, because hundreds of small I's take turns in command (In Search of the Miraculous, chs. 1 and 2). Both hold that freedom and will are not given but a possibility manufactured through work on oneself: self-observation, self-remembering, effort against mechanicalness. And both affirm that no one awakens alone. Gurdjieff expressed it in the mythical and deliberately obscure language of Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson; Ouspensky ordered it as a system in his lectures, The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution. Much of what is known of Gurdjieff's oral teaching comes, in fact, from Ouspensky's version.

Pourquoi: The affinity is that of a master and his most systematic disciple: Ouspensky worked with Gurdjieff in Russia between 1915 and 1918 and transmitted that teaching in In Search of the Miraculous, published posthumously in 1949. The relationship broke down: Ouspensky withdrew in 1918 and definitively in the 1920s, and led his own groups in London, centred on the study of the system rather than on the figure of the master. They agree in doctrine, not in style: Gurdjieff taught in a demanding and disconcerting way, with dances, movements and provoked situations; Ouspensky, intellectually and in an orderly fashion. Hence they part on the question of the master: one deems him indispensable; the other stresses the school.

Ils concordent sur

P. D. Ouspensky · Eckhart Tolle

Waking from automatic pilot: self-remembering and the power of now

Both start from the same diagnosis: the ordinary person lives asleep and what they call decisions are reactions. Ouspensky puts it through the thesis of the man-machine, to whom everything happens (In Search of the Miraculous); Tolle, through identification with a mind that thinks compulsively and repeats inherited patterns (The Power of Now). And both propose as the first step an attention turned towards oneself in the midst of life, not in retreat: self-remembering, being aware of oneself while looking at something, in Ouspensky; presence, watching the thinker and feeling the inner body, in Tolle. For both, freedom does not exist before that awakening, and it begins the moment one sees oneself functioning.

Pourquoi: There is no documented relationship between them, although the vocabulary of awakening and automatic pilot found in contemporary spirituality owes much to the Fourth Way. The affinity has clear limits. Self-remembering demands effort, a deliberate division of attention and a system of group work, and its goal is to form a permanent self that does not yet exist; Tolle's presence is presented as something not manufactured or reached in time but recognised as one's own being. Ouspensky writes for a school with discipline and hierarchy; Tolle, for individual readers without a tradition. They agree on the first step, not on the path or the goal.

Anecdotes et récits

Anecdotes et récits

Témoignage1915

The disguised man in the Moscow café

In 1915 Ouspensky, just back from India and wary of the mystical circles of both capitals, resisted for weeks meeting a certain 'G.'. When he finally agreed, he was taken to a small café in a noisy side street, frequented by petty traders and commission agents. There he saw a man of oriental type with a black moustache and piercing eyes, in a black overcoat with a velvet collar and a bowler hat, who gave him the disquieting impression of someone 'poorly disguised': a raja or sheikh he pictured in a white burnous or gilded turban, sitting among shopkeepers and speaking Russian with a strong Caucasian accent. What the man told him that day completely changed Ouspensky's opinion. The account opens In Search of the Miraculous and has become the founding scene of the Fourth Way.

Origine du récit: In Search of the Miraculous, ch. 1, written by Ouspensky years later from his notes.

Source: Ouspensky, P. D. In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1949; Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950.

Témoignage1915–1916

The cigarettes on the Nevsky

Practising the 'self-remembering' Gurdjieff had taught him, Ouspensky was walking one afternoon along the Liteiny towards the Nevsky Prospekt, determined not to lose his attention. He managed it for several streets and began to feel the inner peace that follows great efforts. On reaching the Nevsky, still 'remembering himself', he thought of calling at the tobacconist's where his cigarettes were made. Two hours later he 'woke up' in a cab on the way to the printers, on the Tavricheskaya. In that time he had done sensible things — gone home, telephoned, written two letters, changed his route — but in complete sleep. The conclusion he drew, with humour and alarm at once, has been quoted countless times: suddenly he remembered that he had forgotten to remember himself. The episode illustrates better than any theory what the system calls waking sleep.

Origine du récit: In Search of the Miraculous, ch. 7. Autobiographical account; there are no other witnesses.

Source: Ouspensky, P. D. In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1949; Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950.

Témoignage1916

The voice in the chest: Finland, August 1916

In August 1916, after fasts and exercises that had left him on edge, Ouspensky met Gurdjieff and about eight pupils at a group member's country house in Finland. That night Gurdjieff called Ouspensky and two other pupils into a small room, showed them certain postures and again asked why they could not tell the story of their lives. 'And with this the miracle began,' Ouspensky writes: he began to hear Gurdjieff's thoughts, and then his voice 'inside me, as it were in the chest near the heart', putting questions he answered aloud, to the astonishment of the other two. That same night, already in bed, he says he held an entirely mental conversation with him. The remarkable thing about the account is its honesty: Ouspensky admits he could obtain no proof and that it all might have been imagination or a waking dream.

Origine du récit: In Search of the Miraculous, ch. 13. Ouspensky deliberately omits the content of the questions.

Source: Ouspensky, P. D. In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1949; Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950.

Documenté1920–1921

The book that travelled to America on its own

Without Ouspensky's knowledge, a Russian émigré, Nicholas Bessaraboff, took a copy of Tertium Organum to America and put it in the hands of the Rochester architect Claude Bragdon, an enthusiast of the fourth dimension and author of designs based on the hypercube. Bragdon translated it with Bessaraboff and published it in 1920 through his small Manas Press; its success was such that Alfred A. Knopf took the book over. Meanwhile its author, ruined by the civil war, was living as a refugee in Constantinople and nobody knew where he was. Bragdon eventually tracked him down and sent him royalties, and the book's unexpected fame eased his settling in London in 1921.

Origine du récit: Documented by the Manas Press edition (1920) and recounted by Wikipedia and Lachman (2004).

Source: Wikipedia (en), «P. D. Ouspensky» (vida, obras y bibliografía).

Contesté1947

'Start again': the 1947 meetings

Back in England in 1947, gravely ill, Ouspensky called several meetings with his London pupils. To general bewilderment he refused to speak of the system in the usual terms and insisted that each must decide what he wanted and start again, without relying on what had been learned. His pupil Rodney Collin read these meetings as an abandonment of the system and an invitation to seek the source directly; other pupils read them as a final teaching demand to break dependence on formulas. The records of those meetings, published later, do not settle the debate, which still divides those who claim his legacy.

Origine du récit: English Wikipedia records Collin's view and qualifies it with A Record of Meetings; the detailed version is in Lachman (2004) and the published records.

Source: Wikipedia (en), «P. D. Ouspensky» (vida, obras y bibliografía).

Enseignements

Enseignements

Les notions qui structurent sa pensée, expliquées dans leur contexte.

Self-rememberingrecuerdo-de-si
The central practice of the system Ouspensky learned from Gurdjieff, and which he placed at the heart of his own teaching. It consists in dividing attention so that, while perceiving what happens outside — 'I am walking', 'I am looking' — one is aware at the same time of oneself as the perceiver. Ouspensky relates in In Search of the Miraculous that on trying it he found he almost never succeeded and that most of his life passed without this second pole of attention; hence the idea that ordinary man lives in 'waking sleep'. When he did sustain it, he experienced perceptions of unusual intensity. He insisted that it should not be confused with the apperception of academic psychology or with mere concentration, and that it cannot be practised without continuous effort and the conditions of a school.

In many respects the functional equivalent of Buddhist mindfulness or the 'watchfulness' of other traditions, though framed in its own psychological vocabulary.

Source: Ouspensky, P. D. In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1949; Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950.

Man as a machinehombre-maquina
The starting thesis of the teaching as Ouspensky presents it: man in his usual state is a machine driven by external influences; he does not 'do', everything 'happens' to him, as wars and revolutions happen to nations. He lacks a permanent 'I': he is a multitude of small I's that succeed and contradict one another. But — as The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution insists — he is a very peculiar machine, able to know that he is a machine and, from that recognition, to find the means to cease being one. Self-observation, without judgement or attempts to change what is observed, is the first step; inner unity and real will are the result, not the starting point.

It comes from Gurdjieff; Ouspensky made it the core of his introductory exposition.

Source: Ouspensky, P. D. The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution. Nueva York: Hedgehog Press, 1950.

The four states of consciousnessestados-de-conciencia
Ouspensky distinguishes four possible states: night sleep; the so-called waking state, which is really sleep with open eyes; self-consciousness, in which man sees himself and which appears only in flashes; and objective consciousness, in which he would see things as they are. The basic error, he holds, is believing one already possesses the third state. Each state has its own functions: the higher ones would work through 'higher centres' that are fully developed in man but disconnected from his ordinary life. The whole practice of the system is directed at prolonging and stabilising moments of self-consciousness.

Ouspensky had already explored 'cosmic consciousness' in Tertium Organum before meeting Gurdjieff.

Source: Ouspensky, P. D. The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution. Nueva York: Hedgehog Press, 1950.

The Fourth Waycuarto-camino
Gurdjieff distinguished three traditional ways of development — the fakir's, working on the body; the monk's, on the emotions; and the yogi's, on the mind — all requiring withdrawal from the world. The fourth way works on all three at once and in the midst of ordinary life, without vows or enclosure, through understanding and conscious effort. Ouspensky made the phrase the very name of the teaching and developed the idea of 'Fourth Way schools', which would appear and disappear throughout history bound to a specific task. His groups in London, Lyne Place and New Jersey combined study of the ideas with shared physical and household work.

It gives its name to the Atlas's fourth-way tradition.

Source: Wikipedia (en), «P. D. Ouspensky» (vida, obras y bibliografía).

Eternal recurrence and the fourth dimensioneterno-retorno
Before Gurdjieff, Ouspensky had already built his own metaphysics: the three-dimensional world would be a section of a reality of more dimensions, and time the way we imperfectly perceive a higher dimension of space. From this he drew the possibility that a whole life recurs: the individual would live the same existence again, with the same mistakes, unless a change of consciousness broke the cycle. Strange Life of Ivan Osokin dramatises the idea and A New Model of the Universe devotes a chapter to it. Ouspensky held this conviction to the end, though Gurdjieff gave it little importance, and he distinguished it from reincarnation in the Theosophical sense.

It is in dialogue with Nietzsche, Hinton and early twentieth-century theories of time.

Source: Ouspensky, P. D. A New Model of the Universe: Principles of the Psychological Method in Its Application to Problems of Science, Religion, and Art. Londres: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1931.

Retraites

Retraites et centres

Lieux et rencontres liés à son enseignement. Nous vous mettons en relation avec ceux qui les organisent.

  • Nueva York (Upper East Side) · Estados Unidos

    Gurdjieff Foundation of New York

    The Gurdjieff Foundation of New York

    The Gurdjieff Foundation of New York belongs to the network of foundations established after Gurdjieff's death by his pupil Jeanne de Salzmann, together with the Institut Gurdjieff in Paris and the Gurdjieff Society in London. Its first president, Lord Pentland, had been a pupil of Ouspensky before working with Gurdjieff, and many of Ouspensky's pupils joined this work. It offers weekly group meetings led by senior students, classes in the Movements, the sacred dances and exercises Gurdjieff taught, meditation and retreats. Access is gradual and begins with introductory events.

  • Barons Court, Londres · Reino Unido

    The Study Society, Colet House (London)

    The Study Society

    The Study Society was registered in 1951, four years after Ouspensky's death, at the initiative of his pupil Dr Francis Roles, to continue his work as a school of the Fourth Way. It is based at Colet House in west London, which presents itself as a spiritual gateway in the centre of the city. Its current programme brings together meditation, the Movements, study groups on the Masnavi and meetings devoted to Rumi, the dervish turning and a Sunday Advaita gathering. Its main website sometimes rejects automated requests; the Colet House site responds normally.

  • Londres · Reino Unido

    Gurdjieff Studies, London

    Gurdjieff Studies Ltd (organización benéfica registrada)

    Gurdjieff Studies is a London charity devoted to the Fourth Way that offers group meetings, reading groups, practical activities, Movements classes and intensive residential stays. It holds that the teaching is passed on from teacher to pupil in direct lines of transmission, and maintains two reference websites: one on Gurdjieff's life and work, with his music, dances and chronology, and another devoted to P. D. Ouspensky, reconstructing his work in England, including the Lyne Place period. It is independent of the network of foundations established by Jeanne de Salzmann.

Voir toutes les retraites →

Vidéos

Vidéos

Enregistrements, entretiens et documentaires. Les vidéos sont lues depuis YouTube ; elles ne sont pas hébergées ici.

  • Gary Lachman - Gurdjieff, Ouspensky, and the Fourth Way

    Conférence· EN· 80 min

    Theosophical Society in England & Wales

  • Gary Lachman on P.D. Ouspensky — Kensington Central Library

    Conférence· EN· 96 min

    Gary Lachman

  • P. D. Ouspensky and the Gurdjieff Work with Gary Lachman

    Entretien· EN· 83 min

    New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove

  • The Philosophy of the Cosmic Dance 2017 pt1. The Story of Colet House

    Conférence· EN· 57 min

    Philip Jacobs

  • The Strange Life of P.D. Ouspensky

    Analyse· EN· 6 min

    Theodore Nottingham

  • С. А. Панин — Семинар: «Эзотерический текст как форма философии. П. Д. Успенский, Tertium Organum»

    Conférence· RU· 2020· 96 min

    АИЭМ · ASEM

  • Шелковников А. Ю. — Пётр Демьянович Успенский — философ эзотеризма

    Conférence· RU· 2026· 27 min

    АИЭМ · ASEM

  • Валерий Бондаренко «Пётр Успенский. Искатель чудесного»

    Conférence· RU· 2019· 127 min

    СМИБС

  • Tertium Organum by P.D. Ouspensky (Book Review)

    Analyse· EN· 2026· 32 min

    Hermitix Podcast

  • Gurdjieff in Finland, Pinpointing the Legendary Ouspensky Telepathy Incident

    Entretien· EN· 2022· 7 min

    Appleknocker Radio

  • ¿Quién fue P.D. Ouspensky?

    Enregistrement de tiers· ES· 2023· 7 min

    Vojo Talks

Galerie

Galerie

Images dont la licence a été vérifiée. Chacune conserve son auteur et son attribution.

Manuscrits

Manuscrits

Témoins manuscrits et textes anciens, avec leur dépositaire et leurs conditions de consultation.

  • RU · Cyrillic / Latin · 1900–1947

    P. D. Ouspensky Memorial Collection

    Témoin conservé
    Papeles, manuscritos y notas de reuniones (1935–1947)
    Dépositaire
    Yale University Library, Manuscripts and Archives · MS 840
    Numérisation
    hdl.handle.net/10079/fa/mssa.ms.0840…
Manuscrits →

Relations

Relations

Influences, filiations et affinités. On distingue la relation documentée de la similitude identifiée par analyse.

  • Disciple de

    G. I. Gurdjieff

    Gurdjieff's pupil from 1915 to 1918 in Russia and intermittent collaborator until 1924; author of the most widely read account of his teaching.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    G. I. Gurdjieff

    He separated from him in 1918 and definitively in 1924; in In Search of the Miraculous he explains that Gurdjieff's way was not his.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Helena Blavatsky

    Ouspensky was interested in Theosophy from 1907 and visited Adyar in 1913–1914; the influence is that of the Theosophical movement generally, not a personal relationship (Blavatsky had died in 1891).

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

  • Contemporain de

    Alice A. Bailey

    Contemporaries from the Theosophical milieu who founded their own esoteric schools in the interwar English-speaking world; no relationship between them is recorded.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

Sources

Sources

Bibliographie et catalogues consultés pour cette fiche.

  1. Ouspensky, P. D. In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1949; Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950.
  2. Wikidata, «Peter Demianovich Ouspensky» (Q434266): fechas y lugares de nacimiento y muerte (registra tres fechas de nacimiento: 4, 5 y 17 de marzo de 1878).
  3. Ouspensky, P. D. The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution. Nueva York: Hedgehog Press, 1950.
  4. Open Library, autor OL2263413A (Uspenskiĭ, Petr Demʹi͡anovich): obras y ediciones con ISBN.
  5. Lachman, Gary. In Search of P. D. Ouspensky: The Genius in the Shadow of Gurdjieff. Wheaton: Quest Books, 2004.
  6. Webb, James. The Harmonious Circle: The Lives and Work of G. I. Gurdjieff, P. D. Ouspensky, and Their Followers. Nueva York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1980.
  7. Ouspensky, P. D. Tertium Organum: The Third Canon of Thought, a Key to the Enigmas of the World. Trad. de Nicholas Bessaraboff y Claude Bragdon. Rochester (NY): Manas Press, 1920.
  8. Ouspensky, P. D. A New Model of the Universe: Principles of the Psychological Method in Its Application to Problems of Science, Religion, and Art. Londres: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1931.
  9. Wikipedia (en), «P. D. Ouspensky» (vida, obras y bibliografía).
  10. Wikipedia (ru), «Успенский, Пётр Демьянович» (familia, primeras publicaciones rusas y bibliografía).
  11. Yale University Library, Manuscripts and Archives. P. D. Ouspensky Memorial Collection (MS 840).
  12. Wikisource en ruso, «Автор:Пётр Демьянович Успенский» (página de autor con la relación de textos de dominio público: Tertium Organum, Символы Таро, Странная жизнь Ивана Осокина, Разговоры с дьяволом).
  13. Wikidata, «Nicholas Bessaraboff» (Q26244034): musicólogo estadounidense, cotraductor de Tertium Organum (1894–1973).
Ayant droit
Herederos de P. D. Ouspensky y editoriales titulares de cada obra (Knopf/Penguin Random House, Routledge, Harcourt). Fallecido en 1947: dominio público en los países con plazo de 70 años post mortem desde 2018; en EE. UU. siguen protegidas las obras publicadas desde 1931.

En attente de confirmation

Ce que cette fiche n'a pas encore pu établir. Nous préférons le dire plutôt que de combler.

  • «Obispon invita», en la transcripción original del encargo, podría referirse a P. D. Ouspensky (posible error de dictado de «Ouspensky»); confirmarlo con quien hizo el encargo.
  • Día exacto de nacimiento: Wikipedia (en) da el 5 de marzo de 1878, Wikipedia (ru) el 17 de marzo (5 de marzo del calendario juliano) y Wikidata registra además el 4; se deja con precisión de mes.
  • Año de la primera edición rusa de Tertium Organum (1911 o 1912) y de El simbolismo del tarot (1912 o 1913); de Kinemadrama / Iván Osokin (1915 o 1917).
  • Edición castellana verificada de Conversaciones con el diablo, La cuarta dimensión y de las recopilaciones póstumas (A Further Record, Cosmology, A Record of Meetings).
  • Fecha y circunstancias exactas de su traslado a EE. UU. (enero de 1941 según algunas biografías) y del regreso a Inglaterra en 1947.
  • Obras menores no registradas como obra: Memory (Stourton Press, 1953), New Horizons (Globe Press, 1990) y las traducciones de Kipling, Bret Harte, Poe, Ouida, Mark Twain, Edward Carpenter y Hinton que Ouspensky hizo al ruso (fuente: Open Library OL2263413A y Wikipedia ru). Los títulos de Kessinger (Superman, What Is Yoga?, etc.) son capítulos sueltos de A New Model of the Universe.
  • No hay en Wikimedia Commons un retrato fotográfico de Ouspensky con licencia libre verificada; buscar fotografías anteriores a 1917 en archivos rusos de dominio público.
  • Sala de lectura (2026-10-25): los seis textos registrados quedan con caution por la regla española de 80 años (Ouspensky †1947, libre en España el 1 de enero de 2028). Además: la traducción inglesa de Tertium Organum lleva derechos de Bessaraboff (†1973) en la UE y en España; falta la fecha de muerte de R. R. Merton, traductor de A New Model of the Universe (en EE. UU. libre el 1 de enero de 2027); y hay que fijar qué redacción reproducen las páginas rusas de Символы Таро y de Iván Osokin. No registrados: Четвёртое измерение (sin texto en línea fiable localizado) y Letters from Russia 1919 (la copia de Internet Archive lleva la introducción de la edición de 1978, con derechos; el texto original está en The New Age, 1919, en el Modernist Journals Project, en números sueltos).
  • Vídeos (2026-10-25): en español solo se ha localizado una semblanza divulgativa breve (Vojo Talks); no hay conferencias académicas en castellano ni documentales de televisión pública sobre Ouspensky en YouTube.

Recherche effectuée le 2026-10-25