Aller au contenu
The ConsciousLibrary

Christianisme · Mystique chrétienne · Christianisme orthodoxe

Ignatius Brianchaninov

Игнатий (Брянчанинов) · Дмитрий Александрович Брянчанинов

1807 – 1867Personne historiquement documentée

Évêque et écrivain ascétique russe (1807-1867). Ingénieur militaire qui refusa la carrière à laquelle le destinaient sa famille et Nicolas Ier, il fut pendant vingt-cinq ans archimandrite de l'ermitage de Saint-Serge près de Saint-Pétersbourg, puis évêque du Caucase et, retiré à Babaïevo, l'auteur des « Essais ascétiques », de l'« Offrande au monachisme contemporain », du « Discours sur la mort » et des écrits sur la prière de Jésus et l'illusion spirituelle (prelest) qui firent de lui le grand maître de la sobriété de l'orthodoxie moderne. Canonisé en 1988.

œuvres
52œuvres
éditions
52éditions
citations
9citations
vidéos
13vidéos
images
7images
Retrato de Ignati Brianchanínov

Retrato de Ignati Brianchanínov · Public domain

Dans ses propres mots

«Delusion is the damaging of human nature by falsehood. Delusion is the state of all human beings without exception, produced by the fall of our forefathers. We are all in delusion. Knowing this is the greatest protection against delusion. The greatest delusion is to consider oneself free from delusion.»

«О молитве Иисусовой», Отдел II, «О прелести» (Аскетические опыты, t. I, cap. 27).

Son idée centrale

Prelest, or spiritual delusion: Prelest (from lest, deceit, seduction) is for Ignatius the damaging of human nature by falsehood: a state in which we have all been since the Fall and from which only the truth, which is Christ, frees us.

Biographie

5 min de lecture

Traduction assistée à partir de l'original espagnol, en attente de relecture par un traducteur natif.

Un jeune homme de la noblesse de Vologda

Dmitri Alexandrovitch Briantchaninov naquit le 5 février 1807 selon le calendrier julien (17 du grégorien) à Pokrovskoïé, le domaine familial du district de Griazovets, dans le gouvernement de Vologda. Les Briantchaninov étaient une ancienne famille noble qui remontait à Mikhaïl Brenko, écuyer du grand-prince Dmitri Donskoï. Il était l'aîné des enfants qui survécurent et fut élevé avec sévérité : la biographie traditionnelle raconte qu'il prit un grave refroidissement, aux séquelles durables, pour n'avoir pas osé sortir de la rivière glacée avant son père. Il apprit le latin et le grec, dessinait, chantait et jouait du violon ; il lisait des vies de saints et priait longuement. Quand il confia à son père qu'il voulait être moine, celui-ci ne le prit pas au sérieux : il le destinait à la carrière militaire et à la cour.

L'ingénieur qui ne voulut pas l'être

En 1822, il entra, avec le meilleur examen de sa promotion, à l'École principale du génie de Saint-Pétersbourg, où il attira l'attention du grand-duc Nicolas, inspecteur de l'arme et futur empereur. Il fréquenta les salons aristocratiques et littéraires ; la biographie de sa communauté cite Krylov, Joukovski, Pouchkine, Batiouchkov et Glinka parmi ses relations. Mais il cherchait chez les Pères de l'Église les réponses que ne lui donnaient ni la science ni la philosophie. Avec son ami Mikhaïl Tchikhatchev, il communiait chaque semaine, chose alors inouïe, et en 1826 il rencontra à la laure Saint-Alexandre-Nevski le hiéromoine Léonide (Naguolkine), futur starets d'Optino, qui le confirma dans sa vocation. Au terme de ses études, il demanda son congé ; Nicolas Ier le refusa, lui envoya ses médecins quand il tomba malade de la tuberculose et lui offrit un régiment sous le climat clément du Sud. Dmitri ne voulait que son congé. On l'affecta à la forteresse de Dünabourg, et en novembre 1827, pour raison de santé, il l'obtint enfin.

Années de noviciat

Il suivit Léonide comme novice au monastère Saint-Alexandre-de-Svir, puis à l'ermitage de Plochtchansk. Il fut boulanger, pêcheur et cocher, mais commença aussi à douter de certaines méthodes de son maître. En 1829, en route vers Optino, il s'arrêta avec Tchikhatchev à l'ermitage de Beloberejsk auprès du hiéroschémamoine Athanase, disciple de Païssi Vélitchkovski et pratiquant de la prière du cœur. Malade, il revint un temps chez ses parents et, en 1830-1831, à l'ermitage de Semigorodnaïa, écrivit la « Lamentation du moine », qu'un contemporain jugea incroyable chez un jeune homme à peine majeur. Le 28 juin 1831, l'évêque de Vologda lui donna l'habit sous le nom d'Ignace, en l'honneur d'Ignace d'Antioche ; en juillet, il fut ordonné diacre et prêtre.

L'ermitage de Saint-Serge

Après avoir restauré le monastère en ruine de Pelchma, dont il fut fait higoumène en 1833, il fut appelé par Nicolas Ier. L'empereur, selon la tradition biographique, lui dit qu'il lui devait l'éducation reçue et que, puisqu'il avait choisi une autre voie, il paierait sa dette sur celle-ci : il lui confia l'ermitage de la Trinité-Saint-Serge, au bord de la route de Peterhof, afin qu'il en fasse un monastère modèle sous les yeux de la capitale. Ignace, archimandrite à partir de 1834 et, dès 1838, doyen des monastères du diocèse, le dirigea pendant près de vingt-cinq ans : il étoffa la communauté, ordonna le culte, bénéficia des conseils de Glinka pour le chœur et de l'amitié du peintre Karl Brioullov. Il subit aussi des calomnies et des sanctions humiliantes. Il intercéda auprès du métropolite Philarète en faveur de Léonide, sanctionné par son évêque, et en 1847, malade, demanda à se retirer ; on ne lui accorda que onze mois de congé, qu'il passa au monastère Saint-Nicolas de Babaïevo, sur les rives de la Volga.

Évêque au Caucase

Le 27 octobre 1857, il fut sacré évêque du Caucase et de la mer Noire, avec siège à Stavropol, un diocèse sans maison épiscopale ni ressources, dont la moitié de la population, cosaque, échappait à sa juridiction, et qui comptait de nombreux vieux-croyants hostiles. En quatre ans, avec l'aide de son frère Piotr, vice-gouverneur, il ordonna le culte, améliora le traitement du clergé et construisit un nouveau séminaire. Il y écrivit l'« Offrande au monachisme contemporain » et des traités sur le salut et la perfection chrétienne, sur la vision des esprits et sur la doctrine orthodoxe de la Mère de Dieu, rédigée face au dogme catholique de l'Immaculée Conception. En 1861, épuisé, il obtint sa retraite.

Babaïevo

Le 13 octobre 1861, il s'installa à Babaïevo. Il y écrivit ou acheva le « Discours sur la mort » (1862), où il soutenait que les âmes et les anges possèdent un corps subtil, éthéré — thèse que contesta Théophane le Reclus —, et, encouragé par l'éditeur Ivan Glazounov, révisa et unifia tous ses écrits. Les deux premiers tomes de ses œuvres, les « Essais ascétiques », parurent en 1865. Il célébra sa dernière liturgie le dimanche de Pâques, 16 avril 1867 ; le 21, il reçut tout juste imprimés les tomes trois et quatre, et il mourut le 30 avril (12 mai du calendrier grégorien). Dans la poche de sa soutane, on trouva quelques kopecks.

Un maître de la sobriété

Le cœur de son œuvre est une mise en garde. Ignace défendit la prière de Jésus et la lecture des Pères, mais insista sur le fait que, sans humilité et sans guide, la vie spirituelle dégénère en prelest, l'illusion spirituelle qui confond l'exaltation des sens et de l'imagination avec la grâce. D'où sa méfiance envers la mystique occidentale — il qualifia de « charmante », au sens du charme qui ensorcelle, l'Imitation de Jésus-Christ et eut des mots très durs pour François d'Assise et Thérèse d'Avila — et son conseil, pour une époque privée de startsy expérimentés, de vivre « par conseil », en se guidant sur l'Écriture et les Pères. Sa prose limpide et sa connaissance de l'âme moderne firent de ses œuvres, sans cesse rééditées, l'une des lectures ascétiques les plus répandues de l'Église russe. Nikolaï Leskov en fit un personnage des « Ingénieurs désintéressés » (1887), et Pavel Florensky le cita comme l'autorité en matière d'illusion spirituelle.

Le concile de l'Église russe le canonisa le 6 juin 1988, en même temps que Théophane le Reclus ; ses reliques sont vénérées au monastère de Tolga, près de Iaroslavl.

Sources: Ignati (Brianchanínov). Аскетические опыты, t. I. San Petersburgo: I. I. Glazunov, 1865; texto según Полное собрание творений и писем, 2.ª ed., Moscú: Palómnik, 2014, t. 1 (ISBN 978-5-88060-031-1). Texto en Azbuka very. · Ignati (Brianchanínov). Приношение современному монашеству. San Petersburgo, 1867; texto según Полное собрание творений и писем, Moscú: Palómnik, 2014, t. 4. Texto en Azbuka very. · Semiónova, T. N., y Redkina, Yu. R. (eds.). Полное жизнеописание святителя Игнатия Кавказского. Moscú–San Petersburgo: Izd-vo im. Sv. Ignatia Stavropolskogo / Biblioteca Nacional de Rusia, 2002. ISBN 5-88904-028-8. · Florenski, Pável. Столп и утверждение истины. Moscú: Put', 1914 (cita a Ignati en las cartas quinta, sexta, novena y décima: prelest, «Imitación de Cristo», monacato). Texto en Azbuka very. · Leskov, Nikolái S. Инженеры-бессребреники (1887). Texto en Wikisource.

Chronologie

La vie, année après année

Chaque point est un événement documenté. Cliquez pour le lire, avec sa source et son degré de certitude.

  1. 17 février 1807 · 0 ans

    Birth

    Dmitry Brianchaninov is born on the family estate (5 February, Julian).

    Documenté

  2. 1822 · 15 ans

    Main Engineering School

    He enters directly into the second year after the best examination of his intake.

    Documenté

  3. 1826 · 19 ans

    Meeting with Leonid (Nagolkin)

    He meets the future Optina elder at the Alexander Nevsky Lavra; Nicholas I refuses his request to resign.

    Documenté

  4. 6 novembre 1827 · 20 ans

    Discharge from the army

    With the rank of engineer lieutenant, he obtains his discharge on grounds of illness against his parents' wishes and enters the Alexander-Svirsky monastery as a novice.

    Documenté

  5. avril 1829 · 22 ans

    With Paisius's disciple

    With Mikhail Chikhachev he visits the hieroschemamonk Athanasius, a disciple of Paisius Velichkovsky, and passes through Optina.

    Documenté

  6. 28 juin 1831 · 24 ans

    Monastic tonsure: Ignatius

    He is tonsured with the name Ignatius; in July he is ordained deacon (5th) and priest (20th).

    Documenté

  7. novembre 1833 · 26 ans

    Superior of the St Sergius hermitage

    Nicholas I entrusts him with the Trinity-St Sergius hermitage; archimandrite on 1 January 1834.

    Documenté

  8. 1838 · 31 ans

    Dean of the monasteries

    Appointed dean (blagochinny) of the monasteries of the St Petersburg diocese.

    Documenté

  9. 1847 · 40 ans

    Leave and first publications

    He spends eleven months at Babayevo monastery; his first articles appear in Biblioteka dlya chteniya.

    Documenté

  10. 27 octobre 1857 · 50 ans

    Bishop of the Caucasus and the Black Sea

    Consecrated in the Kazan Cathedral; he arrives in Stavropol on 4 January 1858.

    Documenté

  11. 13 octobre 1861 · 54 ans

    Retirement to Babayevo

    Retired through illness, he settles at Babayevo monastery in Kostroma province.

    Documenté

  12. 1862 · 55 ans

    Word on Death

    He publishes the Word on Death and The Cup of Christ; in 1863–1864 follow the Word on Salvation, the one on the vision of spirits and the Supplement.

    Documenté

  13. 1865 · 58 ans

    Ascetic Experiences

    The publisher Ivan Glazunov issues the first two volumes of his works.

    Documenté

  14. 12 mai 1867 · 60 ans

    Death

    He dies on 30 April (Julian), the Sunday of the Myrrhbearers, days after receiving volumes III and IV of his works.

    Documenté

  15. 1870

    Posthumous Paterikon

    His annotated collection of sayings of the Desert Fathers, the Otechnik, is published.

    Documenté

  16. 6 juin 1988

    Canonisation

    Proclaimed a saint; on 26 May his relics had been translated to the Tolga monastery (Yaroslavl).

    Documenté

Œuvres

Œuvres essentielles

Les œuvres sans lesquelles on ne comprend pas son héritage.

Ascetic Experiences, vol. I — Ignatius Brianchaninov

Œuvre écrite · 1865

Ascetic Experiences, vol. I

Аскетические опыты. Том I

The first volume of his works, gathered at Babayevo with the publisher Ivan Glazunov: fifty-seven pieces written over thirty years, from the prose poems of his youth ('The Garden in Winter', 'The Tree in Winter before the Cell Window', 'Thought on the Seashore') to the treatises on reading the Gospel and the Fathers, avoiding heterodox books, love of God and neighbour, fasting, prayer, the eight passions and their opposite virtues, tears, humility, patience, monasticism and the Gospel commandments. It includes the three sections 'On the Jesus Prayer' (with the one on spiritual delusion), the 'Rule of Attention to Oneself for Those Living in the World', 'The Cup of Christ' and 'My Lament'. It is the book through which most Russian readers have come to know Ignatius.

4 éditions · amazon.com

On the Prayer of Jesus (a conversation between an elder and his disciple) — Ignatius Brianchaninov

Œuvre écrite · 1867

On the Prayer of Jesus (a conversation between an elder and his disciple)

О молитве Иисусовой. Беседа между старцем и учеником

A treatise in dialogue form, in three parts—the Jesus Prayer in general, spiritual delusion and the practice of the prayer—which belongs to the first volume of the Experiences and was also published separately in 1867. Ignatius maintains that the Jesus Prayer is the duty of every monk and the good of every Christian, recalls that at Sarov it was taught to every novice and that Seraphim recommended it, but insists on practising it with attention and humility, enclosing the mind in the words, without seeking sensations or resorting to the bodily techniques of the ancient hesychasts, which he considers dangerous without an experienced guide. He distinguishes oral prayer, mental prayer and prayer of the heart, which is God's gift and not the fruit of method. It is his most translated text.

6 éditions · amazon.com

An Offering to Contemporary Monasticism (The Arena) — Ignatius Brianchaninov

Œuvre écrite · 1867

An Offering to Contemporary Monasticism (The Arena)

Приношение современному монашеству

His 'spiritual testament' for monks, written largely at Stavropol and published as the last volume of his works. It opens with the 'Rules of Outward Conduct for Novice Monks', continues with fifty chapters of 'Counsels on the Inner Work of the Monk'—study and keeping of the Gospel commandments, reading the Fathers, the dangers of the hermit life, obedience to an elder and life 'by counsel' in an age without experienced guides, prayer and the Jesus Prayer, remembrance of death, sobriety, fasting, almsgiving, fallen angels, dreams—and ends with the 'Lament of a Monk'. It holds that the monasticism of his day must rest on Scripture and the Fathers rather than on charismatic directors, now almost non-existent. Translated into English as The Arena.

4 éditions · amazon.com

Toute son œuvre (52)

Voir ses 52 œuvres dans la bibliothèque

Citations

Citations localisées dans une œuvre précise. Chacune porte sa provenance et son degré de fiabilité.

Delusion is the damaging of human nature by falsehood. Delusion is the state of all human beings without exception, produced by the fall of our forefathers. We are all in delusion. Knowing this is the greatest protection against delusion. The greatest delusion is to consider oneself free from delusion.

Прелесть есть повреждение естества человеческого ложью. Прелесть есть состояние всех человеков, без исключения, произведенное падением праотцов наших. Все мы – в прелести. Знание этого есть величайшее предохранение от прелести. Величайшая прелесть – признавать себя свободным от прелести.

Vérifiée«О молитве Иисусовой», Отдел II, «О прелести» (Аскетические опыты, t. I, cap. 27).

1 / 9
Citations apocryphes ou d'attribution contestée (2)
  • «"He who is careless about prayer is careless about his salvation; he who quits prayer renounces his salvation."»

    It circulates in English under his name (the English Wikipedia quotes it) without reference to a specific work; it has not been located in the chapters on prayer of the Ascetic Experiences consulted. It is consistent with his teaching, but the exact wording remains to be verified.

  • «Prophecies about Russia's destiny and the Antichrist attributed to him in devotional compilations.»

    They have an authentic core—letter 29 to Muravyov-Karsky on Russia's 'enormous significance' and his teachings on the end of the world—but popular anthologies expand and rearrange them without citing the source.

Dernières paroles

Il n'existe aucun témoignage vérifiable de ses dernières paroles.

The sources consulted (Russian Wikipedia, Azbuka very biography) record his last liturgy on Easter Sunday 1867, the arrival of volumes III and IV of his works on 21 April and his death on 30 April, the Sunday of the Myrrhbearers, but give no final words. The full biographies (2002, 2010) have not been consulted directly.

Source: Azbuka very, «святитель Игнатий (Брянчанинов)»: biografía (familia, Escuela de Ingenieros, noviciado, ermita de San Sergio, episcopado, muerte), legado y catálogo de obras y cartas.

Interroger

Ce que répond son œuvre

Douze grandes questions de l'humanité et ce que ses textes permettent d'y répondre, références à l'appui. Nous ne lui prêtons jamais de paroles.

  • Qu'est-ce que l'Absolu ? Dieu existe-t-il ?

    God is known through humility and prayer, not through speculation

    Un Dieu personnelIl le dit expressément

    Ignatius Brianchaninov places God within the frame of Orthodox faith, Trinitarian and creator, and devotes his work not to proving him but to showing how one comes to him. In the Ascetic Essays the way to God is prayer, and its measure the states of prayer through which one who prays steadily advances. The precondition is to recognise oneself as fallen: what belongs to man impoverished by the fall is to pray, as what belongs to a beggar is to ask. He warns insistently against spiritual delusion, which consists in imagining God or feeling him according to one's own fancies; whoever believes himself free of delusion is in the greatest delusion of all. Ignatius's God is therefore personal, but hidden from pride and accessible only to humility, repentance and attentive reading of the Fathers.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qui suis-je ? Existe-t-il un vrai soi ?

    A created, immortal and fallen soul, incorporeal only in comparison with God

    Une âme créée et immortelleIl le dit expressément

    Ignatius Brianchaninov starts from the Orthodox doctrine of the created, immortal soul, but stresses its fallen condition: in the Ascetic Essays and the Word on Man he insists that human nature has been damaged by falsehood since the fall, and that we all live in some degree of delusion about ourselves. In the Word on Death and in his letter on why he called the soul ethereal he held a disputed thesis: that souls and angels, compared with God, the only absolutely incorporeal spirit, possess a subtle corporeality, so that after death the soul keeps a form resembling that of the body. Theophan the Recluse replied to him. What matters to him is practical: to know oneself as fallen is the condition for the self to be healed by grace.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi souffrons-nous ?

    Fallen nature suffers; accepting sorrows is drinking the cup of Christ

    La séparation d'avec DieuIl le dit expressément

    Ignatius Brianchaninov places the origin of suffering in the fall: human nature, damaged by falsehood, lives in a state of sickness that shows itself in the passions, death and delusion about oneself. In his essays he distinguishes several states of human nature with regard to good and evil, from the fallen natural state to the one renewed by grace. In the face of afflictions, his teaching is that of the Fathers he collected on patience in sorrows: they are not sought, but accepted as permitted by God, with thanksgiving and without murmuring, because they heal pride. In The Cup of Christ he presents sufferings as the cup the Lord drank first and offers to his disciples. He rejects every explanation that turns pain into energy or an impersonal law: it is a matter between the fallen creature and its God.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Que se passe-t-il après la mort ?

    The soul passes the aerial trials and awaits judgement: death is prepared for

    Vie éternelle et résurrectionIl le dit expressément

    Ignatius Brianchaninov devoted a specific treatise to the question, the Word on Death of 1862, later enlarged with a supplement. There he sets out, relying on the Fathers and the lives of the saints, that after death the soul, separated from the body but keeping a subtle form, passes through the aerial trials, in which the fallen spirits accuse it of its sins, and receives a particular judgement that determines its state until the resurrection and the last judgement. His intention is not to feed the imagination but to awaken sobriety: the memory of death is for him one of the Christian's fundamental exercises, because it undoes the illusion of an endless earthly life. His teaching on the aerial trials provoked debate within Russian Orthodoxy itself.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Comment atteint-on la libération ou le salut ?

    Christ saves us; man brings repentance, humility and keeping the commandments

    Par la grâce et l'amourIl le dit expressément

    In the Word on Salvation and Christian Perfection, Ignatius Brianchaninov holds that salvation is the work of Christ, received through faith and baptism and kept or recovered through repentance. What falls to man is not to earn it but to dispose himself: to recognise his fall, weep over his sins, keep the Gospel commandments and pray with attention. He warns sharply against the opposite path, that of one who seeks lofty spiritual states, visions or consolations before being purified: it is the way of delusion, which mistakes one's own imagination for grace. That is why he advises his contemporaries, who in his view lack true elders, to be guided by reading the Fathers and by prudent counsel. Perfection is God's gift to the humble.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Faut-il un maître ?

    True elders are lacking: one must live by counsel and be guided by the Fathers

    Utile mais pas indispensableIl le dit expressément

    Ignatius Brianchaninov knew in his youth the elders of the tradition of Paisius Velichkovsky and corresponded with the elders Leonid and Macarius of Optina. Yet his diagnosis of his own age is sober: authentic elders, bearers of the Spirit, have almost entirely disappeared, and surrendering oneself unreservedly to an inexperienced director is dangerous, because it can lead both into spiritual delusion. He therefore proposes, in The Arena: An Offering to Contemporary Monasticism, life by counsel: to be guided by Scripture and the Fathers, whose reading he considers indispensable for making their thought one's own, and to consult experienced brethren prudently, without depending blindly on anyone. The human teacher helps, but the sure authority lies in the Gospel as interpreted by the saints.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Le monde est-il réel ?

    The created world is good; the «world» to be rejected is that of the passions

    Une création bonne et réelleCela se déduit de sa doctrine

    Ignatius Brianchaninov affirms the goodness of creation, but his attention centres on the distinction, classic in ascetic writing, between the world as God's work and the world as the sum of passions that draw away from him. A former military engineer, he knew the science of his time well, and in the Word on the Sensory and Spiritual Vision of Spirits he holds that reality is not exhausted by what the senses perceive: around the human being there are spirits, angels and demons, which fallen nature does not see and which rarely manifest themselves. He warns, however, against the desire to see such realities, which he regards as a gateway to delusion. The visible world is real and good, but it is only part of creation, and fallen man perceives it in a limited way.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Qu'est-ce que l'amour ?

    True love is born from keeping the commandments, not from emotion

    L'amour de Dieu et du prochainIl le dit expressément

    In the Ascetic Essays, Ignatius Brianchaninov devotes chapters to love of neighbour and love of God, and his teaching is characteristically sober. He distinguishes natural love, mixed with passion, preference and attachment, from the spiritual love taught by the Gospel, which sees in each person the image of God and loves it in God. This second love is born not from feeling or exaltation, but from keeping the commandments, from humility and from prayer; whoever seeks to feel an ardent love before being purified risks mistaking for love an emotion of fallen nature. Love of neighbour is the path to love of God, and both culminate in a gift God grants to the humble.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Sommes-nous libres ou tout est-il déterminé ?

    Free but wounded by the fall, man must surrender his will to God

    Un libre arbitre réelIl le dit expressément

    Ignatius Brianchaninov affirms human freedom with Orthodox tradition, but stresses how much the fall has damaged it: the will of natural man is inclined to evil and deceived by delusion, so that its freedom, without grace, tends to choose badly even while believing it chooses well. That is why his ascetic teaching insists on renouncing one's own will and surrendering to God's, by keeping the commandments. In The Judgements of God, written in his last years, he reflects on the providence that governs human events, painful ones included, and advises submitting to it humbly instead of judging it. That surrender, however, is a free act: no one can be saved without willing it, and personal responsibility never disappears.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Pourquoi méditer ou prier ?

    Prayer is what belongs to fallen man: asking with attention and humility

    L'amitié avec DieuIl le dit expressément

    For Ignatius Brianchaninov the way to God is prayer, and the measure of the way travelled is the states of prayer into which one who prays steadily gradually enters. His starting point is the fallen condition: what belongs to the beggar is to ask, and what belongs to man impoverished by the fall is to pray. The soul of every exercise is attention, without which prayer is dead; that is why he teaches enclosing the mind in the words of the prayer, and recommends the Jesus Prayer said slowly and attentively. He warns strongly against seeking sensations, images or mystical warmth, in which he sees the gateway to spiritual delusion, and prefers humble, repentant prayer to any psychophysical method practised without guidance.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • La raison peut-elle connaître l'ultime ?

    Fallen reason deceives itself; it must be formed by the Gospel and the Fathers

    L'Écriture et le raisonnementIl le dit expressément

    Ignatius Brianchaninov, trained as an engineer, does not despise natural reason, but considers it damaged by the fall: the human mind is exposed to delusion and tends to take its own constructions for truth. It therefore cannot be the judge of revelation. The remedy is to form it with the Gospel, to which he devotes chapters of the Ascetic Essays, and with the writings of the holy Fathers, whose thought and spirit he urges making one's own through assiduous reading. With equal firmness he advises keeping away from books on Christianity written by false teachers, and judges severely works such as the Imitation of Christ, which he regards as the fruit of delusion. Reason, healed by humility and guided by tradition, can understand revealed truth.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres
  • Se retirer du monde ou le transformer ?

    Monk means solitary: inner solitude is the condition of prayer

    Se retirer pour trouverIl le dit expressément

    Ignatius Brianchaninov chose monastic life against the will of his family and of Nicholas I himself, who had destined him for military engineering, and he lived for monasticism, to which he devoted The Arena: An Offering to Contemporary Monasticism. His ideal is solitude: monk means solitary, and whoever has not gathered himself within is not yet a monk, even if he lives in the remotest monastery. That solitude is above all inward, which is why he also wrote a rule of attention to oneself for one living in the world, showing lay people how to guard mind and heart amid their occupations. But he does not trust the world: he sees it as a place of distraction and delusion, and considers withdrawal, outward when possible and inward always, the condition of the encounter with God.

    Comparer cette question avec d'autres maîtres

Anecdotes et récits

Anecdotes et récits

Témoignage1833

The debt to the Emperor

Nicholas I had known Dmitry Brianchaninov at the Engineering School, when he was Grand Duke and inspector of the corps, and never quite forgave him for giving up his military career. He refused his first request to resign, sent him his doctors when he fell ill and offered him a guards regiment in the south. Years later, when the young hegumen Ignatius was about to be sent to the Ugresha monastery near Moscow, the Emperor summoned him. According to the biography published by his community, he told him: 'I like you as much as before. You are in my debt for the education I gave you and for my affection. You did not want to serve me where I meant to place you; you chose another road of your own will: pay me your debt on it. I give you the St Sergius hermitage; I want you to live there and make of it a monastery that will be a model of monasteries in the eyes of the capital.' Ignatius governed it for almost twenty-five years.

Origine du récit: The Emperor's words come from the saint's traditional biography, based on the recollections of his circle (Chikhachev and the St Sergius community); the facts—the refused resignation, the offer of the regiment, the appointment in 1833—are documented.

Source: Azbuka very, «святитель Игнатий (Брянчанинов)»: biografía (familia, Escuela de Ingenieros, noviciado, ermita de San Sergio, episcopado, muerte), legado y catálogo de obras y cartas.

Témoignagedécada de 1830

The schemamonk Porphyry and the Ladoga ice

In his treatise on spiritual delusion, Ignatius tells of something he saw with his own eyes at Valaam. In a remote hut lived the schemamonk Porphyry, given to a kind of prayer about which Ignatius could say little, except that his favourite reading was Thomas à Kempis's Imitation of Christ, 'written out of opinion'. One autumn evening Porphyry visited the elders of the skete, separated from his hermitage by a deep inlet of Lake Ladoga that had to be walked around. As he left they warned him: 'Don't think of crossing on the ice: it has only just formed and is very thin.' The schemamonk answered quietly, with outward humility: 'I have become light.' He went. Shortly afterwards a desperate cry was heard. It was dark; it took a long time to find the place and to bring out the body, already lifeless. For Ignatius it was the example of how the delusion of one's own holiness leads to catastrophe.

Origine du récit: Ignatius's own account, who says he knew Porphyry, in 'On Delusion' (Ascetic Experiences, vol. I, ch. 27); there is no other independent source.

Source: Ignati (Brianchanínov). «О молитве Иисусовой» (Отделы I–III: «О молитве Иисусовой вообще», «О прелести», «Об упражнении молитвою Иисусовою»), en Аскетические опыты, t. I, caps. 26–28. Texto en Azbuka very.

Témoignage1822–1826

Communion every week

In the St Petersburg of the 1820s frequent communion was rare among laypeople, who usually received once a year. The cadets Dmitry Brianchaninov and Mikhail Chikhachev, who sought in the Fathers what they did not find in science or philosophy, began to receive communion every week and to frequent the monks of the Valaam podvorye and the Alexander Nevsky Lavra. Dmitry's father, learning of the changes in his son, applied to the management of the Engineering School, which placed him under surveillance. The friendship with Chikhachev lasted all his life: he accompanied him in the novitiate, on the journeys to Optina and at the St Sergius hermitage.

Origine du récit: Azbuka very biography, based on Chikhachev's memoirs and the biography published by his disciples.

Source: Azbuka very, «святитель Игнатий (Брянчанинов)»: biografía (familia, Escuela de Ingenieros, noviciado, ermita de San Sergio, episcopado, muerte), legado y catálogo de obras y cartas.

Documenté1830–1831

A novice's 'Lament of a Monk'

Between 1830 and 1831, ill, not yet tonsured and having left his teacher Leonid, Dmitry Brianchaninov spent some months at the Semigorodnaya hermitage in Vologda province. There he wrote The Lament of a Monk for His Brother Who Has Fallen into Sinful Temptation, composed, the subtitle says, 'by a friend for a friend and by a brother for a brother, for the mutual benefit of author and reader'. It is a penitential meditation in a biblical key on sin as spiritual death and repentance as resurrection. A contemporary remarked that it would hardly be believed that the book had been written by a youth barely of age. Thirty years later Ignatius placed it at the close of his Offering to Contemporary Monasticism.

Origine du récit: The date and place are given by the Russian Wikipedia together with the contemporary's remark; the text appears in the Offering (1867).

Source: «Игнатий (Брянчанинов)», Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, teología —prelest, angelología, apologética—, Briulov, Leskov, bibliografía). Consultada el 25-10-2026.

Contesté1845–1846

Bryullov and the painting from eternity

In 1845–1846 the painter Karl Bryullov, author of The Last Day of Pompeii, was working on a Trinity icon for a church of the St Sergius hermitage and often saw its superior. Ignatius wrote to him that his paintings were 'the expression of a deeply thirsting soul', and that a painting that truly satisfied him would have to be 'a painting from eternity': such is the demand of true inspiration. Some researchers thought the archimandrite considered it possible that the painter might become a monk. The art historian Grigory Goldovsky rules this out, but maintains that Bryullov saw Ignatius as a teacher and that his Christ in the Tomb, painted in those same years, is the painter's answer to that lesson.

Origine du récit: Ignatius's letter to Bryullov survives (Azbuka very); the link between it and Christ in the Tomb is an interpretation by Grigory Goldovsky reported in the Russian Wikipedia.

Source: «Игнатий (Брянчанинов)», Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, teología —prelest, angelología, apologética—, Briulov, Leskov, bibliografía). Consultada el 25-10-2026.

Documentéfinales de la década de 1830

In defence of the elder Leonid

At the end of the 1830s the elder Leonid (Lev) of Optina, the man who had guided Ignatius's vocation, was denounced several times to the Bishop of Kaluga, who moved him from the skete to the monastery and forbade him to wear the great schema or receive visitors. His disciple Macarius wrote a letter in his defence, and Archimandrite Ignatius, by then dean of the St Petersburg monasteries and well connected in the capital, passed it to Metropolitan Philaret of Moscow. Leonid was exonerated. The episode shows Ignatius's loyalty to a teacher whose methods he had come to doubt in his youth.

Origine du récit: Azbuka very biography; the correspondence with Leonid and Macarius survives among his letters.

Source: Azbuka very, «святитель Игнатий (Брянчанинов)»: biografía (familia, Escuela de Ingenieros, noviciado, ermita de San Sergio, episcopado, muerte), legado y catálogo de obras y cartas.

Témoignageabril de 1867

A few kopecks

Ignatius had run for almost twenty-five years one of the most favoured monasteries in St Petersburg, which received generous donations, and had been a bishop. He spent his last years at Babayevo revising his writings, helping the community with its affairs and worship and writing to his spiritual children. On Easter Sunday, 16 April 1867, he celebrated his last liturgy. On the 21st the freshly printed third and fourth volumes of his works reached him. He died on 30 April, the Sunday of the Myrrhbearers. A few kopecks were found in the pocket of his cassock: all his material wealth.

Origine du récit: The facts of the last weeks are recorded by the Russian Wikipedia and the Azbuka very biography; the detail of the kopecks comes from the traditional biography, based on the testimony of those around him.

Source: Azbuka very, «святитель Игнатий (Брянчанинов)»: biografía (familia, Escuela de Ingenieros, noviciado, ermita de San Sergio, episcopado, muerte), legado y catálogo de obras y cartas.

Enseignements

Enseignements

Les notions qui structurent sa pensée, expliquées dans leur contexte.

Prelest, or spiritual delusionprelest
Prelest (from lest, deceit, seduction) is for Ignatius the damaging of human nature by falsehood: a state in which we have all been since the Fall and from which only the truth, which is Christ, frees us. It becomes dangerous when the ascetic mistakes it for grace. He distinguishes two forms. 'Opinion' (mnenie) is a delusion of the mind: one forms a false idea of one's virtues and holiness, and this secret pride, without necessarily leading to madness, turns one away from repentance; from it, in his view, come books such as The Imitation of Christ. 'Fancy' (mechtanie) is a delusion of the imagination and senses: the one who prays seeks visions, lights, fragrances, sweetness, and the demons, taking the form of saints or angels, flatter his self-love until he is lost. The remedy is humility, awareness of being a sinner, repentance, prayer without images and the control of Scripture and the Fathers.

It systematises the teaching of Gregory of Sinai, Symeon the New Theologian and John Climacus; Florensky cited it as the most detailed treatment of this 'spiritual disease'.

Source: Ignati (Brianchanínov). «О молитве Иисусовой» (Отделы I–III: «О молитве Иисусовой вообще», «О прелести», «Об упражнении молитвою Иисусовою»), en Аскетические опыты, t. I, caps. 26–28. Texto en Azbuka very.

Living by counselvida-por-consejo
Ignatius was convinced that in his day the 'Spirit-bearing' elders who in antiquity proclaimed God's will directly to their disciples had almost disappeared. Total obedience to a starets, the classic path, became dangerous if the guide lacked experience. He therefore proposed, as a form of obedience adapted 'to our weakness', life 'by counsel': seeking God's will in Scripture and the writings of the Fathers, and asking advice of virtuous and prudent brethren, receiving it with extreme caution, without being carried away by first impressions. He holds up as a model Antony the Great, who learned from many, temperance from one, meekness from another. Progress is slower, he admits, but that is God's disposition for these times and must be accepted with gratitude.

It contrasts with the revival of eldership at Optina, from which he himself came; developed in An Offering to Contemporary Monasticism, chs. 12–13.

Source: Ignati (Brianchanínov). Приношение современному монашеству. San Petersburgo, 1867; texto según Полное собрание творений и писем, Moscú: Palómnik, 2014, t. 4. Texto en Azbuka very.

Prayer with attentionoracion-con-atencion
For Ignatius prayer is above all 'the weeping of fallen and repentant man before God', and its condition is humility: 'the one spiritual place for offering the sacrifice of prayer is humility'. In the Jesus Prayer he rejects seeking 'the place of the heart' through breathing or posture, techniques he considers dangerous without a guide; he proposes instead enclosing the mind in the words of the prayer, saying them slowly and attentively, because 'the soul of all exercises in the Lord is attention'. Oral prayer becomes mental and, when God grants it, prayer of the heart, which is a gift of grace and not the result of a method. To laypeople he gives a rule of attention for daily life: quality before quantity, the Gospel read to direct conduct, moderation in food.

It follows John Climacus ('enclose the mind in the words of the prayer'); it distances itself from a literal reading of the psychophysical methods of Nicephorus the Solitary and Gregory of Sinai.

Source: Ignati (Brianchanínov). «О молитве Иисусовой» (Отделы I–III: «О молитве Иисусовой вообще», «О прелести», «Об упражнении молитвою Иисусовою»), en Аскетические опыты, t. I, caps. 26–28. Texto en Azbuka very.

Reading the Fatherslectura-de-los-padres
Ignatius made reading the Fathers the axis of modern spiritual life. 'Make the thoughts and spirit of the holy Fathers your own by reading their writings': since heaven has received them, their writings are a guaranteed road, and all flow into the Gospel as rivers into the ocean. But such reading requires discernment: one should prefer authors who wrote for one's own state of life—monks living in community should not simply read what was written for anchorites—and beware of heterodox books, because 'whoever reads the books of false teachers enters into communion with the spirit of falsehood'. Hence his severity towards Western mystical literature, which he regarded as the fruit of delusion.

It partly replaces, for an age without elders, the living guidance of the starets; it gave his works their characteristic density of patristic quotation.

Source: Ignati (Brianchanínov). Аскетические опыты, t. I. San Petersburgo: I. I. Glazunov, 1865; texto según Полное собрание творений и писем, 2.ª ed., Moscú: Palómnik, 2014, t. 1 (ISBN 978-5-88060-031-1). Texto en Azbuka very.

Souls and angels: spirits with an ethereal bodyalmas-y-angeles
In the Word on Death (1862) and its Supplement Ignatius maintains that only God is absolutely incorporeal spirit, because only He is unlimited; angels and human souls, as creatures, are limited in space and time and therefore possess a subtle, 'ethereal' or 'gaseous' body, invisible to bodily eyes. With this thesis, which he based on Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologian, John Chrysostom and other Fathers, he explained how demons can act on man, how the soul is seen and held after death at the aerial 'toll-houses' and where hell and paradise are located. Theophan the Recluse replied that souls and angels are spirits in the proper sense and that this doctrine materialised theology; the controversy remains a subject of study in Russian theology.

In the Supplement he answers Western critics (among them the Abbé Bergier); the thesis also ties in with his response to the spiritualism fashionable in the 1860s.

Source: «Игнатий (Брянчанинов)», Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, teología —prelest, angelología, apologética—, Briulov, Leskov, bibliografía). Consultada el 25-10-2026.

Vidéos

Vidéos

Enregistrements, entretiens et documentaires. Les vidéos sont lues depuis YouTube ; elles ne sont pas hébergées ici.

  • Игнатий Брянчанинов. «Плач инока» / Библейский сюжет / Телеканал Культура

    Voir sur YouTube

    Cette vidéo ne peut pas être intégrée ; elle s'ouvre sur YouTube.

    Игнатий Брянчанинов. «Плач инока» / Библейский сюжет / Телеканал Культура

    Documentaire· RU· 2019· 26 min

    Телеканал КультураChaîne officielle

  • Учитель покаяния. Святитель Игнатий (Брянчанинов)

    Documentaire· RU· 2020· 88 min

    Свято-Елисаветинский монастырьChaîne officielle

  • Film about St. Ignatius Brianchaninov (with participation of A. Osipov)

    Documentaire· RU· 2021· 97 min

    Алексей Ильич ОсиповChaîne officielle

  • Святитель Игнатий Брянчанинов — наставник духовной жизни

    Conférence· RU· 2019· 145 min

    Алексей Ильич ОсиповChaîne officielle

  • Святитель Игнатий Брянчанинов — духовное сокровище Церкви

    Conférence· RU· 2021· 45 min

    Алексей Ильич ОсиповChaîne officielle

  • 150 лет преставления свт. Игнатия Брянчанинова — Осипов А. И.

    Conférence· RU· 2017· 59 min

    Алексей Ильич ОсиповChaîne officielle

  • Конференция «Святитель Игнатий Брянчанинов. 150 лет со дня преставления»

    Conférence· RU· 2017· 215 min

    Алексей Ильич ОсиповChaîne officielle

  • Конференция по наследию святителя Игнатия Брянчанинова. Ч. 1 (Абрамцево, 15.05.2012)

    Conférence· RU· 2012· 41 min

    Алексей Ильич ОсиповChaîne officielle

  • А. И. Осипов. Святитель Игнатий Брянчанинов

    Conférence· RU· 2017· 53 min

    tvsoyuzChaîne officielle

  • Святитель Игнатий (Брянчанинов). Священник Валерий Духанин

    Conférence· RU· 2023· 87 min

    БИБЛИЯ и толкования — Экзегет.руChaîne officielle

  • Святитель Игнатий (Брянчанинов) о прелести 1

    Conférence· RU· 2020· 102 min

    ФИЛЬМИКИ © им. А. Осипова.

  • Book trailer: Harbor for Our Hope: St Ignatius (Brianchaninov) On Acquiring Peace Amidst Suffering

    Enregistrement de tiers· EN· 2020· 5 min

    Holy Trinity PublicationsChaîne officielle

  • Saint Ignatius Brianchaninov — The Field: Cultivating Salvation (Part 1)

    Enregistrement de tiers· EN· 2023· 41 min

    Orthodox Spiritual Heritage

Galerie

Galerie

Images dont la licence a été vérifiée. Chacune conserve son auteur et son attribution.

Relations

Relations

Influences, filiations et affinités. On distingue la relation documentée de la similitude identifiée par analyse.

  • Disciple de

    Leonid (Nagolkin) de Óptina

    His first teacher: he met him in 1826 and followed him as a novice to Svir and Ploshchansk; later he doubted some of his methods but defended him before Metropolitan Philaret at the end of the 1830s.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Paisi Velichkovski

    He was formed in the Paisian tradition through Leonid and the hieroschemamonk Athanasius of Beloberezhsk, Paisius's direct disciple, whom he visited in 1829.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Seraphim of Sarov

    In On the Jesus Prayer he quotes, on the word of old monks, 'the blessed elder Seraphim's' advice to unite outward and inward prayer, and recalls that at Sarov the Jesus Prayer was taught to every novice.

    Relation documentée

  • A correspondu avec

    Theophan the Recluse

    They corresponded; in May 1865 Theophan confided to him his wish to follow him into retirement. They were canonised together in 1988.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Theophan the Recluse

    Theophan refuted his teaching on the ethereal body of souls and angels in The Soul and the Angel Are Not Body but Spirit; even so he valued his works and recommended them.

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    Pavel Florensky

    Florensky cites him in The Pillar and Ground of the Truth (1914) for his definition of prelest, his judgement on The Imitation of Christ, 'The Garden in Winter' and his view of monasticism.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Thomas à Kempis

    In On Delusion he judges The Imitation of Christ to be written 'out of opinion', that is, from the delusion of one's own holiness, and considers it dangerous for the Orthodox reader.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Francis of Assisi

    He cited him, together with Teresa of Ávila, as an example of the spiritual delusion of Western mysticism, in very harsh terms.

    Relation documentée

  • En désaccord avec

    Teresa of Ávila

    He regarded her, with Francis of Assisi, as an example of the spiritual delusion of Western mysticism.

    Relation documentée

  • A influencé

    Nikolái Leskov

    Leskov made him a character in his story The Unmercenary Engineers (1887), about his fellow students at the Engineering School.

    Relation documentée

  • A rencontré

    Karl Briulov

    Acquaintance at the St Sergius hermitage in 1845–1846 and Ignatius's letter to the painter about 'a painting from eternity'.

    Relation documentée

  • A reçu l'influence de

    Padres del desierto

    He gathered and commented on their sayings in the Paterikon and quotes them constantly; he warns, however, against imitating them literally.

    Relation documentée

  • Contemporain de

    Fyodor Dostoevsky

    Contemporaries; no documented relationship has been found.

    Similitude identifiée par analyse

Sources

Sources

Bibliographie et catalogues consultés pour cette fiche.

  1. Wikidata, «Ignatius Bryanchaninov» (Q984143): P31=Q5, nacimiento 5-2-1807 (juliano), muerte 30-4-1867, 24 enlaces entre wikis.
  2. «Игнатий (Брянчанинов)», Wikipedia en ruso (biografía, teología —prelest, angelología, apologética—, Briulov, Leskov, bibliografía). Consultada el 25-10-2026.
  3. «Ignatius Brianchaninov», Wikipedia en inglés (reliquias en Tolga, traducciones inglesas). Consultada el 25-10-2026.
  4. Azbuka very, «святитель Игнатий (Брянчанинов)»: biografía (familia, Escuela de Ingenieros, noviciado, ermita de San Sergio, episcopado, muerte), legado y catálogo de obras y cartas.
  5. Ignati (Brianchanínov). Аскетические опыты, t. I. San Petersburgo: I. I. Glazunov, 1865; texto según Полное собрание творений и писем, 2.ª ed., Moscú: Palómnik, 2014, t. 1 (ISBN 978-5-88060-031-1). Texto en Azbuka very.
  6. Ignati (Brianchanínov). Приношение современному монашеству. San Petersburgo, 1867; texto según Полное собрание творений и писем, Moscú: Palómnik, 2014, t. 4. Texto en Azbuka very.
  7. Wikimedia Commons, «Category:Works of Ignatius Brianchaninov» (facsímiles de las Сочинения, 1886 y 1905, del Отечник de 1891 y de las cartas de 1913).
  8. Semiónova, T. N., y Redkina, Yu. R. (eds.). Полное жизнеописание святителя Игнатия Кавказского. Moscú–San Petersburgo: Izd-vo im. Sv. Ignatia Stavropolskogo / Biblioteca Nacional de Rusia, 2002. ISBN 5-88904-028-8.
  9. Jondzinski, P. V., Bezhanidze, G. V., Sújova, N. Yu., Yákovlev, A. I., y Bolshakova, S. E. «Игнатий (Брянчанинов)», en Православная энциклопедия, t. XXI. Moscú, 2009, pp. 74–89.
  10. Florenski, Pável. Столп и утверждение истины. Moscú: Put', 1914 (cita a Ignati en las cartas quinta, sexta, novena y décima: prelest, «Imitación de Cristo», monacato). Texto en Azbuka very.
  11. Leskov, Nikolái S. Инженеры-бессребреники (1887). Texto en Wikisource.
  12. Holy Trinity Publications, «Collected Works of St Ignatius (Brianchaninov)» (The Field, The Refuge, The Threshold, The Arena; trad. de Nicholas Kotar y del archimandrita Lazarus Moore).
  13. Open Library, registros de «On the Prayer of Jesus», «The Arena», «The Field», «The Refuge», «The Threshold» y «Harbor for Our Hope».
  14. Ignati (Brianchanínov). «О молитве Иисусовой» (Отделы I–III: «О молитве Иисусовой вообще», «О прелести», «Об упражнении молитвою Иисусовою»), en Аскетические опыты, t. I, caps. 26–28. Texto en Azbuka very.
  15. Teófano el Recluso. «Душа и ангел — не тело, а дух» y presentación de la polémica en Azbuka very («Творческое наследие» de Teófano).
Ayant droit
Dominio público: Ignati murió en 1867. Las traducciones y ediciones modernas pertenecen a sus traductores y editoriales.

En attente de confirmation

Ce que cette fiche n'a pas encore pu établir. Nous préférons le dire plutôt que de combler.

  • Ediciones en español con ISBN: no se ha localizado ninguna traducción española de sus obras en Open Library ni en la búsqueda web (ni de «Sobre la oración de Jesús», ni de la «Ofrenda», ni de los «Ensayos»).
  • Traducciones inglesas de dominio público: ninguna localizada (la de Father Lazarus, 1952, está protegida).
  • Fuente primaria de los juicios sobre Francisco de Asís y Teresa de Ávila («западные сумасшедшие») y de la frase inglesa «He who is careless about prayer…»: se han tomado de la Wikipedia rusa e inglesa sin ver el pasaje.
  • Fecha de redacción y primera edición de «Слово о человеке», «Слово об ангелах», «Лютеранизм», «Понятие о ереси и расколе» y «О необходимости Собора».
  • Últimas palabras: consultar las biografías completas («Полное жизнеописание», 2002; «Ищите всюду Духа, а не буквы», 2010) y las memorias de su hermano Piotr y de Chijachov.
  • Programa de afiliación de Holy Trinity Publications: no verificado.
  • Relación con Lev Tolstói, Vladímir Soloviov y Dostoievski: no se ha encontrado ninguna documentada (Ignati murió en 1867); Dostoievski figura sólo como contemporáneo.

Recherche effectuée le 2026-10-25