Vai al contenuto
The ConsciousLibrary

Tantra · Buddismo · Mahayana · Buddismo tibetano

Tsongkhapa

ཙོང་ཁ་པ་བློ་བཟང་གྲགས་པ། · tsong kha pa blo bzang grags pa · རྗེ་རིན་པོ་ཆེ། · 宗喀巴

1357 – 1419Persona storicamente documentata

Monaco, filosofo e riformatore tibetano (1357-1419), nato nell'Amdo e formatosi per due decenni presso maestri di tutte le scuole del Tibet centrale. La sua sintesi di disciplina monastica, studio ragionato, sentiero graduale (lamrim) e tantra, insieme alla sua lettura prāsaṅgika di Nāgārjuna, fondò la scuola Gelug, sorta attorno al monastero di Ganden (1409), alla quale appartengono i Dalai Lama. Le sue opere complete occupano diciotto volumi.

opere
175opere
edizioni
58edizioni
citazioni
5citazioni
video
13video
immagini
7immagini
Tsongkhapa, pintura del siglo XVI (Rubin Museum of Art)

Tsongkhapa, pintura del siglo XVI (Rubin Museum of Art) · Public domain

Con le sue parole

«Without the wisdom that realises how things are, even if you have trained in renunciation and the mind of awakening you cannot cut the root of existence; therefore strive in the means of realising dependent origination.»

Los tres aspectos principales del camino, estrofa 9 (texto tibetano de Lotsawa House; traducción del investigador)

La sua idea centrale

Stages of the path (lamrim): The lamrim is a way of organising all the Buddha's teachings as a graded itinerary for a single person.

Biografia

5 min di lettura

Traduzione assistita dall'originale spagnolo, in attesa di revisione da parte di un traduttore madrelingua.

Un monaco dell'Amdo

Tsongkhapa nacque nel 1357, nel decimo mese dell'anno del gallo di fuoco, a Tsongkha, una contrada di pastori della provincia dell'Amdo, nel nord-est del mondo tibetano; dal nome del luogo deriva l'appellativo con cui lo conosce la storia. Il suo nome monastico fu Losang Drakpa e i discepoli lo chiamarono Je Rinpoche, «il Signore prezioso». Quasi tutto ciò che si sa della sua infanzia proviene dalle biografie scritte da quegli stessi discepoli, soprattutto da Khedrup Gelek Pelzang, negli anni successivi alla sua morte: secondo questi testi, a tre anni ricevette i voti laici dal quarto Karmapa, Rolpe Dorje, e a sette fu ordinato novizio dal suo primo maestro, Chöje Döndrub Rinchen, che lo educò nella tradizione kadampa.

Vent'anni di apprendistato

Nel 1372, a sedici anni, partì per il Tibet centrale, da cui non sarebbe mai tornato. Ne seguì una formazione di ampiezza eccezionale anche per la sua epoca: medicina e pratiche kagyu a Drikung presso Chenga Chökyi Gyalpo, la Perfezione della saggezza nel collegio di Nyethang Dewachen, l'Abhidharma e la Via di mezzo con il sakya Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö, il suo maestro decisivo, e il Kālacakra con maestri della tradizione jonang. A diciannove anni sostenne i primi dibattiti pubblici e verso i venticinque ricevette l'ordinazione completa. Il registro degli insegnamenti ricevuti, conservato nel primo volume delle sue opere, elenca lignaggi di tutte le scuole, e spiega perché la tradizione lo presenti come un grande sintetizzatore piuttosto che come il fondatore di una setta.

Nel 1388-1389 portò a termine la sua prima grande opera, la Ghirlanda d'oro dell'eloquenza, un commento monumentale all'Ornamento della chiara realizzazione che lo consacrò come erudito. Ma il giovane scolastico non era soddisfatto della propria comprensione della vacuità. Verso il 1390 conobbe Lama Umapa, un mistico del Tibet orientale che, secondo le biografie, faceva da intermediario con Mañjuśrī, il bodhisattva della saggezza; per suo tramite, e più tardi — sempre secondo quei racconti — direttamente, Tsongkhapa avrebbe sottoposto i propri dubbi filosofici alla divinità. La risposta fu una consegna pratica: lasciare per un tempo l'insegnamento, ritirarsi e purificarsi.

Il ritiro di Wölkha

Dal 1392 si ritirò con un piccolo gruppo di discepoli, otto secondo la tradizione, nella valle di Wölkha, a sud-est di Lhasa. Lì, raccontano i biografi, compì centinaia di migliaia di prostrazioni davanti ai trentacinque buddha della confessione, restaurò la grande immagine di Maitreya del monastero di Dzingchi e ricevette dal maestro Lhodrak Namkha Gyaltsen le istruzioni kadampa del sentiero graduale. Verso il 1397-1398, dopo aver sognato Nāgārjuna e i suoi discepoli, avrebbe raggiunto la comprensione definitiva della vacuità leggendo il commento di Buddhapālita alle Stanze fondamentali della Via di mezzo. I sogni e le visioni appartengono all'agiografia; ciò che è verificabile è la svolta della sua opera verso la lettura prāsaṅgika di Nāgārjuna, che avrebbe difeso fino alla fine, e il poema che la celebra, la Lode dell'origine dipendente.

I grandi trattati

Nel 1402, nel monastero di Radreng (Reting), fondato nell'XI secolo da Dromtönpa, discepolo di Atiśa, completò il Grande trattato sugli stadi del sentiero verso il risveglio, il Lamrim Chenmo. Lo stesso anno riunì a Namtsé Deng la comunità monastica per ristabilire l'osservanza del vinaya, convinto che la disciplina fosse la condizione di tutto il resto. Seguirono i trattati sull'etica del bodhisattva e sull'etica tantrica (1403), la Grande esposizione del mantra segreto (1405), l'Essenza dell'eloquenza e l'Oceano del ragionamento, composti nell'eremo di Sera Chöding tra il 1407 e il 1408, la Lampada che illumina i cinque stadi (1411), il Lamrim medio (1415) e, nel 1418, l'Illuminazione del pensiero, il suo ultimo grande commento.

Una convinzione attraversa quei libri. Per Tsongkhapa il ragionamento non è nemico della contemplazione, ma il suo strumento: la vacuità va compresa mediante l'analisi, e la semplice sospensione del pensiero non vi conduce. La vacuità, inoltre, non distrugge il mondo convenzionale; è proprio perché nulla esiste di per sé che le cause producono effetti e l'etica ha senso. Di qui la sua insistenza nell'identificare con esattezza l'«oggetto della negazione», per non negare né troppo né troppo poco, e la sua critica a quanti, in Tibet, scambiavano il vuoto per il nulla o la meditazione per l'assenza di pensieri.

Lhasa, 1409

Il suo prestigio giunse fino alla corte cinese. Nel 1407, e di nuovo nel 1413, l'imperatore Yongle della dinastia Ming lo invitò presso di sé; Tsongkhapa declinò, e la sua lettera di risposta si conserva tra gli scritti miscellanei. Al suo posto, anni dopo, si sarebbe recato a corte il discepolo Shakya Yeshe. Nel primo mese del 1409, con il patrocinio del sovrano Phagmodrupa Drakpa Gyaltsen, inaugurò nel Jokhang di Lhasa la Grande Festa della Preghiera (Monlam Chenmo), che si sarebbe celebrata ogni anno fino al 1959. Nello stesso anno fondò sul monte Drok Riwo il monastero di Ganden, «il gioioso», nome della terra pura di Maitreya.

Attorno a Ganden si formò la comunità che i posteri avrebbero chiamato Gelug, «quelli della tradizione virtuosa». I discepoli moltiplicarono le fondazioni: Jamyang Chöje Tashi Palden aprì Drepung nel 1416 e Jamchen Chöje Shakya Yeshe Sera nel 1419. Gyaltsab Darma Rinchen e Khedrup Gelek Pelzang furono i suoi successori intellettuali, e un altro discepolo, Gendun Drub, sarebbe stato riconosciuto in seguito come il primo Dalai Lama.

Morte ed eredità

Tsongkhapa morì a Ganden nel 1419, il venticinquesimo giorno del decimo mese tibetano, data che da allora i monasteri gelug commemorano con la festa delle lampade di Ganden Ngamchö. La tradizione narra che prima di morire consegnò il copricapo e il mantello a Gyaltsab Je, primo detentore del trono di Ganden. Il suo corpo, conservato in uno stūpa d'argento e d'oro, fu venerato per più di cinque secoli; dopo la distruzione del monastero nel 1959 e durante la Rivoluzione culturale venne bruciato e, secondo la testimonianza raccolta da Thomas Laird, si salvarono soltanto il cranio e parte delle ceneri.

Poche figure del buddhismo tibetano sono state tanto rivestite di leggenda. Nel 1845 il missionario francese Évariste Huc trovò a Kumbum, il monastero eretto nel suo luogo natale, un albero le cui foglie, dicevano i monaci, mostravano lettere sacre da quando sua madre vi aveva gettato i propri capelli; Huc lo vide e non seppe spiegarlo. Le biografie parlano di visioni di Mañjuśrī e di segni prodigiosi; i suoi scritti, invece, mostrano un lettore instancabile dei testi indiani, esigente con le fonti, che scriveva perché altri potessero ragionare da sé. Quell'opera, diciotto volumi nell'edizione di Tashilhunpo, resta il nucleo della formazione dei monasteri gelug e degli insegnamenti dell'attuale Dalai Lama.

Fonti: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465. · Thurman, Robert A. F. (ed.). The Life and Teachings of Tsong Khapa. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1982; nueva ed. 2006, ISBN 9788186470442. Incluye la traducción de la biografía tradicional y de varias obras breves. · Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665. · Tsongkhapa. Ocean of Reasoning: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Trad. Geshe Ngawang Samten y Jay L. Garfield. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780195147339. · Thurman, Robert A. F. Tsong Khapa's Speech of Gold in the Essence of True Eloquence: Reason and Enlightenment in the Central Philosophy of Tibet. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. ISBN 9780691072852 (reed. como The Central Philosophy of Tibet, 1991, ISBN 9780691020679).

Cronologia

La vita, anno per anno

Ogni punto è un evento documentato. Fai clic per leggerlo, con la sua fonte e il suo grado di certezza.

  1. 1357 · 0 anni

    Birth

    Born in the tenth month of the fire-bird year at Tsongkha (Amdo), into a herding family.

    Documentato

  2. ca. 1360 · 3 anni

    Lay vows from the fourth Karmapa

    According to his biographies he receives lay vows and the name Kunga Nyingpo from the fourth Karmapa, Rolpe Dorje.

    Tradizione

  3. ca. 1363 · 7 anni

    Novice ordination

    He is ordained a novice by Chöje Döndrub Rinchen, his first teacher, receiving the name Losang Drakpa.

    Tradizione

  4. 1372 · 16 anni

    Departure for central Tibet

    He leaves Amdo to study in central Tibet and will never return home. He reaches Drikung in the autumn of 1373.

    Documentato

  5. 1375 · 19 anni

    First public debates

    He holds his first formal debates on the great treatises.

    Documentato

  6. ca. 1381 · 25 anni

    Full ordination

    He receives full monastic ordination at about twenty-five.

    Probabile

  7. ca. 1389 · 32 anni

    The Golden Garland

    He completes his commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra (1388–1389), his first major work; that year he makes a Cakrasaṃvara retreat in Yarlung.

    Documentato

  8. ca. 1390 · 33 anni

    Meeting Lama Umapa

    He meets the mystic Umapa, through whom, according to the biographies, he consults Mañjuśrī.

    Tradizione

  9. ca. 1392 · 35 anni

    The Wölkha retreat

    He withdraws with eight disciples to Wölkha; prostrations, purification and restoration of the Dzingchi Maitreya.

    Tradizione

  10. ca. 1397 · 40 anni

    Insight into emptiness

    After dreaming of Nāgārjuna and his disciples he attains, according to tradition, a definitive understanding of emptiness while reading Buddhapālita; he composes the Praise of Dependent Origination.

    Tradizione

  11. 1402 · 45 anni

    The Lamrim Chenmo

    He completes the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path and gathers the community at Namtsé Deng to restore the vinaya.

    Documentato

  12. 1405 · 48 anni

    The Ngagrim Chenmo

    He completes the Great Exposition of Secret Mantra.

    Documentato

  13. 1407 · 50 anni

    The Yongle emperor's invitation; the Essence of Eloquence

    He declines the invitation to the Ming court (repeated in 1413) and composes the Essence of Eloquence and the Ocean of Reasoning at Sera Chöding (1407–1408).

    Documentato

  14. 1409 · 52 anni

    Great Prayer Festival and founding of Ganden

    He institutes the Monlam Chenmo at the Jokhang in the first month, with Drakpa Gyaltsen's patronage, and founds Ganden monastery.

    Documentato

  15. 1415 · 58 anni

    The Middle-Length Lamrim

    He composes the middle-length version of the stages of the path.

    Documentato

  16. 1416 · 59 anni

    Founding of Drepung

    His disciple Jamyang Chöje Tashi Palden founds Drepung.

    Documentato

  17. 1418 · 61 anni

    Illuminating the Intent

    He composes his last great commentary, on Candrakīrti's Entering the Middle Way.

    Documentato

  18. 1419 · 62 anni

    Death

    He dies at Ganden on the 25th day of the tenth Tibetan month; that year his disciple Shakya Yeshe founds Sera.

    Documentato

  19. 1845

    Huc at Kumbum

    The missionary Évariste Huc describes Kumbum's 'tree of ten thousand images' and the legend of its origin.

    Documentato

  20. ca. 1966

    Destruction of the tomb

    After Ganden's destruction (1959) and during the Cultural Revolution his preserved body is burned; remains were saved according to testimonies.

    Documentato

Opere

Opere essenziali

Le opere senza le quali non si comprende la sua eredità.

Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment (Lamrim Chenmo) — Tsongkhapa

Opera scritta · 1402

Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment (Lamrim Chenmo)

སྐྱེས་བུ་གསུམ་གྱི་ཉམས་སུ་བླང་བའི་རིམ་པ་ཐམས་ཅད་ཚང་བར་སྟོན་པའི་བྱང་ཆུབ་ལམ་གྱི་རིམ་པ། (skyes bu gsum gyi nyams su blang ba'i rim pa thams cad tshang bar ston pa'i byang chub lam gyi rim pa)

His most widely read work and the founding text of the Geluk school. Finished in 1402 at Radreng (Reting) monastery, it expands Atiśa's Lamp for the Path into a complete course for the 'three types of person': one who seeks a good rebirth, one who seeks liberation and one who aspires to buddhahood for the sake of others. Its last two sections, on calm abiding (śamatha) and special insight (vipaśyanā), contain his mature account of emptiness and of the 'object of negation'. It fills vol. 13 (pa) of the collected works.

Non disponibile Vedi il libro

11 edizioni

Great Exposition of Secret Mantra (Ngagrim Chenmo) — Tsongkhapa

Opera scritta · 1405

Great Exposition of Secret Mantra (Ngagrim Chenmo)

རྒྱལ་བ་ཁྱབ་བདག་རྡོ་རྗེ་འཆང་ཆེན་པོའི་ལམ་གྱི་རིམ་པ་གསང་བ་ཀུན་གྱི་གནད་རྣམ་པར་ཕྱེ་བ། (rgyal ba khyab bdag rdo rje 'chang chen po'i lam gyi rim pa gsang ba kun gyi gnad rnam par phye ba)

The tantric counterpart of the Lamrim Chenmo, completed in 1405. It sets out systematically the four classes of tantra (action, performance, yoga and highest yoga), the difference between the perfection vehicle and the mantra vehicle, the requirements of initiation and vows, deity yoga and the generation and completion stages of Guhyasamāja. Its central thesis is that tantra does not replace renunciation, bodhicitta and the view of emptiness but presupposes them. It fills vol. 3 (ga).

Non disponibile Vedi il libro

7 edizioni

Essence of Eloquence: Treatise Differentiating the Interpretable and the Definitive — Tsongkhapa

Opera scritta · 1407

Essence of Eloquence: Treatise Differentiating the Interpretable and the Definitive

དྲང་བ་དང་ངེས་པའི་དོན་རྣམ་པར་འབྱེད་པའི་བསྟན་བཅོས་ལེགས་བཤད་སྙིང་པོ། (drang ba dang nges pa'i don rnam par 'byed pa'i bstan bcos legs bshad snying po)

Composed in 1407–1408 at the Sera Chöding hermitage above Lhasa, it is his hermeneutical work: how to decide which of the Buddha's teachings are to be taken literally and which require interpretation. It goes through the Mind-Only (Yogācāra) reading of the Saṃdhinirmocana, then those of Bhāviveka and Candrakīrti within Madhyamaka, concluding in favour of the Prāsaṅgika approach. Tradition regards it as the most difficult of his books. Vol. 14 (pha).

Non disponibile Vedi il libro

3 edizioni

The Three Principal Aspects of the Path — Tsongkhapa

Corrispondenza

The Three Principal Aspects of the Path

ལམ་གྱི་གཙོ་བོ་རྣམ་གསུམ། (lam gyi gtso bo rnam gsum)

Fourteen stanzas sent as a letter to his disciple Tsakho Önpo Ngawang Drakpa in Gyalmorong (eastern Tibet), and preserved among the miscellaneous writings (vol. 2, kha). They reduce the whole path to three dispositions: renunciation or the determination to be free, bodhicitta, and the correct view of emptiness understood as compatible with dependent origination. It is probably the most widely taught and memorised text by Tsongkhapa in the Tibetan world.

Non disponibile Vedi il libro

4 edizioni

Tutta la sua opera (175)

Vedi le sue 175 opere nella biblioteca

Citazioni

Citazioni localizzate in un'opera precisa. Ciascuna porta con sé la sua provenienza e il suo grado di affidabilità.

Without the wisdom that realises how things are, even if you have trained in renunciation and the mind of awakening you cannot cut the root of existence; therefore strive in the means of realising dependent origination.

གནས་ལུགས་རྟོགས་པའི་ཤེས་རབ་མི་ལྡན་ན། །ངེས་འབྱུང་བྱང་ཆུབ་སེམས་ལ་གོམས་བྱས་ཀྱང༌། །སྲིད་པའི་རྩ་བ་བཅད་པར་མི་ནུས་པས། །དེ་ཕྱིར་རྟེན་འབྲེལ་རྟོགས་པའི་ཐབས་ལ་འབད། །

VerificataLos tres aspectos principales del camino, estrofa 9 (texto tibetano de Lotsawa House; traducción del investigador)

1 / 5
Citazioni apocrife o di attribuzione discussa (1)
  • «The more you understand emptiness, the more respect you will have for the law of cause and effect.»

    Circulates online as a literal quotation from Tsongkhapa. It has not been located in this form in any of his works; it is a popular paraphrase of an idea he does develop (the compatibility of emptiness and dependent origination in the Three Principal Aspects and the Praise of Dependent Origination).

Ultime parole

Non esistono testimonianze verificabili delle sue ultime parole.

No reliable last words survive. His disciples' biographies describe his death at Ganden, in meditation, on the 25th of the tenth month of 1419, and tradition adds that he handed his hat and cloak to Gyaltsab Je as a sign of succession, but they transmit no final sentence that can be attributed to him.

Fonte: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Chiedi

Ciò a cui risponde la sua opera

Dodici grandi domande dell'umanità e ciò che i suoi testi permettono di rispondere, con riferimenti. Non gli mettiamo mai parole in bocca.

  • Che cos'è l'Assoluto? Dio esiste?

    Nothing escapes emptiness, neither a god nor an Absolute

    Nessun Dio creatoreSi deduce dalla sua dottrina

    Tsongkhapa does not devote a treatise to denying God: together with all the Indian scholasticism he comments on, he takes for granted the Buddhist critique of an eternal creator. What occupies his work is more radical. In the Praise of Dependent Origination he venerates the Buddha precisely for having seen and taught that everything arises dependently, and in the section on special insight in the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path he carefully defines the «object of negation»: intrinsic existence, which nothing possesses. Neither a god nor an impersonal Absolute escapes this analysis; emptiness itself is empty. The buddhas, to whom he addresses prayers and praises, are not creators but beings who have completed the path; taking refuge in them is justified because they teach how to be liberated, not because they govern the world.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Chi sono io? Esiste un vero sé?

    The self exists only as a designation; what is negated is its intrinsic existence

    Non c'è un sé permanenteLo dice espressamente

    Tsongkhapa devoted much of his work to specifying exactly what is negated when one says there is no self. In the section on special insight in the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path he distinguishes the conventional self, which acts, remembers and reaps the fruits of its deeds, from the self that exists by itself, which is the «object of negation». Negating too much leads to nihilism and destroys ethics; negating too little leaves clinging intact. The person exists as a mere designation on the aggregates, and precisely for that reason it functions: if it had its own existence it could not change. The Three Principal Aspects of the Path sums up the consequence: without the wisdom that understands how things are, neither renunciation nor the mind of awakening cuts the root of existence.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Perché soffriamo?

    The root of saṃsāra is clinging to an existence that nothing has

    Brama e attaccamentoLo dice espressamente

    The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path devotes its middle section to contemplating the suffering of cyclic existence in order to awaken renunciation: the suffering of pain, that of change and the one that pervades all that is conditioned. Its origin is the afflictions and the karma they impel, and among them attachment keeps the wheel turning. But Tsongkhapa insists that the root is not cut by renunciation or compassion alone: in the Three Principal Aspects of the Path he warns that, without the wisdom that understands how things are, the root of existence cannot be cut (verse 9). That root is the ignorance that clings to self and things as though they existed intrinsically. We suffer because we cling to what we believe solid.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Che cosa accade dopo la morte?

    Death is certain, its hour uncertain, and only the Dharma helps

    Rinascita secondo il karmaLo dice espressamente

    In the section on the initial scope of the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path, Tsongkhapa arranges the meditation on death around three roots: death is certain, its moment uncertain, and at that moment nothing helps except the Dharma. From there he moves to the sufferings of the lower destinies, to refuge and to the law of karma, because what determines the next birth is one's actions. Rebirth is not for him an inherited, unexamined belief: mind does not arise from matter but from a previous instant of the same nature, which requires a continuity before and after this life. His work also includes tantric instructions for the moment of death, such as the transference of consciousness.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Come si raggiunge la liberazione o la salvezza?

    A path in stages: renunciation, the mind of awakening and correct view

    Con una pratica disciplinataLo dice espressamente

    Tsongkhapa's work is the most systematic exposition of the gradual path in Tibetan Buddhism. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path arranges practice into three scopes: that of one who seeks a good rebirth, that of one who seeks liberation from the cycle and that of one who aspires to buddhahood for the good of all. The Three Principal Aspects of the Path condenses it into renunciation, the mind of awakening and correct view of emptiness, and warns that without the last the other two do not cut the root. Wisdom is not a sudden intuition: it is cultivated by uniting mental calm and special insight, with study, reflection and analytical meditation. Monastic ethics and, at its culmination, tantra complete a path that demands discipline and perseverance.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Serve un maestro?

    Relying on the master is the root of the path; examining him first, too

    IndispensabileLo dice espressamente

    The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path opens its practical exposition with how to rely on the spiritual master, which it presents as the root of the whole path. Tsongkhapa lists the qualities the master must have, drawing on the Ornament of the Sūtras: disciplined, serene, pacified, wiser than the disciple, with knowledge of emptiness and compassion. He asks the disciple to examine him before committing and then to serve him in thought and deed. In the tantric domain, his commentary on the Fifty Verses on the Master regulates the relationship in detail. The figure of the master is indispensable because the path is long and subtle; but it does not cancel critical study, which he himself practised rigorously on the Indian texts.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Il mondo è reale?

    Appearance dispels the extreme of existence; emptiness, that of nothingness

    Una rete di cause senza sostanzaLo dice espressamente

    Tsongkhapa made dependent origination the centre of his work and of his devotion. In the Praise of Dependent Origination he venerates the Buddha for having seen and taught it, and in the Three Principal Aspects of the Path he formulates his most characteristic thesis: as long as the understanding of appearances, which arise dependently and do not deceive, and that of emptiness present themselves separately, one has not yet understood the Buddha's intent (verse 11). The two imply each other: precisely because things arise dependently they are empty, and because they are empty they can arise and function. Hence, he adds, appearance dispels the extreme of existence and emptiness that of non-existence (verse 13). The world is fully valid conventionally and lacks intrinsic existence.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Che cos'è l'amore?

    See all as mothers swept by four rivers and take on their liberation

    Compassione senza limitiLo dice espressamente

    In the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path, Tsongkhapa systematised the two Indian and Tibetan methods for generating the mind of awakening: the seven instructions of cause and effect, which begin by recognising all beings as mothers in previous lives, remembering their kindness and wishing to repay it, and the method of equalising and exchanging self with others, inherited from Śāntideva. From love, which wishes their happiness, arises compassion, which cannot bear their suffering, and from it the extraordinary intention to take their liberation upon oneself. The Three Principal Aspects of the Path condenses it in an image: beings are swept along by the four rivers of birth, ageing, sickness and death, and seeing this awakens the supreme mind.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Siamo liberi o è tutto determinato?

    Karma is certain and grows, but it can be purified and redirected

    Karma e sceltaLo dice espressamente

    In the section on the initial scope of the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path, Tsongkhapa sets out the laws of karma as the Indian tradition records them: it is certain, because happiness arises from virtue and suffering from non-virtue; it multiplies, because a small act can yield a great fruit; one does not meet what one has not done; and what has been done is not lost by itself. But this determinism is not closed: the same treatise teaches how to purify negative karma through regret, the antidote, the resolve not to repeat it and refuge. Emptiness, far from cancelling causality, is what makes it possible, because only what lacks intrinsic existence can change. Present choice is real on the conventional level.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Perché meditare o pregare?

    Unite mental calm and special insight; meditation is also analysis

    Vedere la realtà così com'èLo dice espressamente

    The last two sections of the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path are devoted to mental calm (śamatha) and special insight (vipaśyanā). Tsongkhapa explains how to develop stable concentration, without laxity or agitation, and how to use it to examine the nature of things. His most characteristic thesis is that analytical meditation is not an obstacle to concentration but part of it: whoever merely fixes the mind without examining does not cut the root of cyclic existence. Special insight consists in understanding emptiness with a concentrated mind, until calm and analysis sustain each other. Prayer, supplications to the lineage and tantric practice have their place, but in the service of that understanding.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Può la ragione conoscere l'ultimo?

    Reason decides which scripture is definitive and leads to emptiness

    Scrittura e ragionamentoLo dice espressamente

    Tsongkhapa grants reason a larger role than almost any other Tibetan Buddhist author. In the Essence of Eloquence he addresses a classic problem: the sūtras say different things, and one must distinguish those of interpretable meaning from those of definitive meaning. That distinction cannot be made by appeal to another scripture, which would be circular, but by reasoning. Scripture is a source of knowledge, but reason interprets it. Likewise, emptiness is first understood inferentially, through analysis, and only afterwards, by meditative familiarisation, directly and non-conceptually. Hence he criticises those who scorn analysis in the name of a thought-free experience: without reasoning, meditation does not cut the root of ignorance.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri
  • Ritirarsi dal mondo o trasformarlo?

    Withdraw into solitude and fulfil your purpose soon; then reform the community

    Ritirarsi per trovareLo dice espressamente

    The Three Principal Aspects of the Path ends with an exhortation: when you have understood the essential points for yourself, withdraw into solitude, rouse the strength of effort and soon fulfil your ultimate purpose (verse 14). Tsongkhapa practised what he taught: he spent years in retreat with a small group of disciples before his maturity as a teacher. But his life is not exhausted in retreat. He restored monastic discipline, founded the monastery of Ganden, instituted the Great Prayer of Lhasa in 1409, with rules he himself set, and wrote letters of advice to rulers and to the Ming emperor. Retreat is the condition of realisation; the well-ordered monastic community is the place where that realisation is preserved and transmitted.

    Confronta questa domanda con altri maestri

Aneddoti e racconti

Aneddoti e racconti

Testimonianza1845–1846

The tree of ten thousand images

When Tsongkhapa was three—so runs the legend the monks of Kumbum told the Lazarist missionary Évariste Huc—his mother shaved his head so that he could take up the religious life and threw the hair outside the tent. From it sprang a tree of fragrant wood on whose leaves a letter of Tibet's sacred script appeared, engraved. Centuries later the monastery of Kumbum, whose name means 'a hundred thousand images', was built on the spot. Huc and his companion Joseph Gabet spent several months there from 1845 and set out to see the marvel with sceptical eyes. They found it: an old tree, protected by a wall, on whose leaves, branches and bark well-formed Tibetan characters could be made out, more or less complete according to the age of the leaf. He wrote that they searched in vain for some fraud and gave up trying to explain it. The passage, one of the most quoted in his Souvenirs, made Kumbum known in Europe and was debated by other travellers for decades.

Origine del racconto: Huc, Souvenirs d'un voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet et la Chine (1850), vol. II, chapter on Kumbum; English translation by William Hazlitt (1852), vol. 2, 'The Tree of Ten Thousand Images' (Project Gutenberg no. 33269). The legend of the tree's birth is hagiographic; the description of the tree is Huc's direct testimony. Huc's closing comment is summarised, not quoted.

Fonte: Huc, Évariste-Régis. Souvenirs d'un voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet et la Chine pendant les années 1844, 1845 et 1846. 2 vols. París: Adrien Le Clere, 1850 (descripción de Kumbum y del «árbol de las diez mil imágenes»).

Racconto agiograficoc. 1390–1398

Questions to Mañjuśrī

Around 1390, already a recognised scholar, Tsongkhapa met Lama Umapa, a yogi from eastern Tibet who, it was said, had seen Mañjuśrī, the bodhisattva of wisdom, since childhood. His disciples' biographies relate that Tsongkhapa began to put his hardest questions about emptiness through him and that the answers unsettled him: none of the positions he knew—neither that of the great Sakya masters nor that of the Jonang—was correct. Later, the same accounts say, he no longer needed an intermediary. The deity's advice was surprisingly practical: to stop teaching for a time, withdraw with a few disciples and accumulate merit and purification, for understanding would come from the union of practice, study of the Indian texts and reflection. The episode explains Mañjuśrī's importance in Tsongkhapa's iconography, which shows the deity's sword and book on his shoulders.

Origine del racconto: Khedrup Gelek Pelzang's biographies, especially the 'secret' one (gsang ba'i rnam thar, vol. 1 of the collected works); summarised and analysed in Jinpa 2019, chs. 5–7. Tsongkhapa left a note on the signs seen at Wölkha (bka' 'bum thor bu 02.3.037) and a letter to Umapa (02.3.045).

Fonte: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Racconto agiografico1392–1393

The prostrations of Wölkha

The retreat Tsongkhapa began in 1392 in the Wölkha valley with eight disciples has become the Geluk model of purification. Traditional accounts measure his effort in millions of prostrations before the thirty-five confession buddhas—thirty-five sets of a hundred thousand, it is often said—and nearly two million maṇḍala offerings, until the stone on which he prostrated was marked and his hand wore down the offering base. The figures have the symbolic precision of hagiography: thirty-five echoes the number of confession buddhas, and their function is to teach that philosophical understanding requires a preparation of the heart. What his works do document is the importance he gave to the practice: his tantric writings include a visualisation of the thirty-five buddhas, and during those years he restored the Maitreya image at the nearby monastery of Dzingchi.

Origine del racconto: Traditional biographies (Khedrup) and their oral circulation in Geluk monasteries; Jinpa 2019 discusses the retreat. The specific figures come from oral tradition and later biographies, not from Tsongkhapa's writings.

Fonte: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Racconto agiograficoc. 1397–1398

The dream of Nāgārjuna

According to the biographies, one night in 1397 or 1398, still at Wölkha, Tsongkhapa dreamed of Nāgārjuna and his five Indian disciples discussing emptiness. One of them, Buddhapālita, came up to him and touched his head with a book. The next day, while reading precisely Buddhapālita's commentary on the Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way, he reached chapter eighteen, the examination of the self, and the doubt that had accompanied him for years dissolved: he understood that emptiness is not nothingness but the absence of intrinsic existence in the very things that arise dependently. That same understanding, tradition says, inspired the Praise of Dependent Origination, in which he celebrates the Buddha for teaching dependent origination as the reason that establishes emptiness. The dream is hagiographic; the doctrinal turn towards Buddhapālita and Candrakīrti, by contrast, is visible throughout his later work.

Origine del racconto: Khedrup Gelek Pelzang's biography (dad pa'i 'jug ngogs); Jinpa 2019; Thurman (ed.) 1982. The dating varies between 1397 and 1398 according to the sources.

Fonte: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Documentato1407–1414

The emperor's invitation

In 1407 an embassy from the Yongle emperor, the third Ming sovereign, reached central Tibet with an invitation for Tsongkhapa to visit the Chinese court. It was an offer of enormous prestige: that same year the fifth Karmapa, Deshin Shekpa, had officiated before the emperor in Nanjing. Tsongkhapa declined. His reply, preserved among his miscellaneous writings as a letter 'to the great sovereign of the Ming', courteously pleads that he cannot undertake the journey. The invitation was repeated in 1413, and again he refused; he sent his disciple Shakya Yeshe instead, who was received by the emperor and, on his return, founded Sera monastery in 1419. The episode is one of the best documented of his life and shows the distance he kept from power: he accepted the patronage of Tibetan rulers for the Great Prayer and for Ganden, but would not become an imperial chaplain.

Origine del racconto: Sparham and Ehm (SEP) give the invitations of 1407 and 1413; the letter appears in the bka' 'bum thor bu (BDRC index 02.3.110). Shakya Yeshe's journey to court and the founding of Sera are documented in Geluk historiography and Chinese sources.

Fonte: Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.

Tradizione oralefinales del s. XIV

The prayer that returned to its author

The most recited stanza in Geluk Buddhism, the Migtsema, invokes Tsongkhapa as Avalokiteśvara, source of objectless compassion, as Mañjuśrī, lord of stainless wisdom, and as Vajrapāṇi, destroyer of Māra's hosts. According to tradition, the text was not born for him. Tsongkhapa is said to have composed it in honour of his teacher Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö, placing his name in the last line; Rendawa, on reading it, replied that those qualities better suited his disciple, changed the name and sent it back. Ever since, the stanza has been addressed to 'Tsongkhapa Losang Drakpa'. The story condenses a real, documented relationship—Rendawa was his principal Madhyamaka teacher, and Tsongkhapa dedicated several praises and letters to him—and an ideal: the master who recognises that the disciple has surpassed him.

Origine del racconto: An account from the Geluk tradition, recorded by Jinpa 2019 and by Lotsawa House in its introduction to the 'Prayer to Rendawa'. The praises to Rendawa appear in the bka' 'bum thor bu (02.3.004–006).

Fonte: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Contestato1959–1969

What remained of his body

For more than five centuries Tsongkhapa's body, preserved and covered in gold, rested in a great stūpa at Ganden, the Serdung, a pilgrimage centre for the whole Geluk world. Ganden was razed after the 1959 uprising and its buildings were dynamited during the Cultural Revolution. According to the account gathered by the journalist Thomas Laird, Red Guards forced a monk, Bomi Rinpoche, to carry the body to the pyre; the monk managed to save the skull and part of the ashes, which are kept today in the rebuilt stūpa. Another version, circulated in exile, holds that only a tooth survived, whose clay impressions were secretly distributed among the faithful. The two versions agree in essentials: Tibet's most venerated relic was destroyed and what little was saved was saved by its devotees.

Origine del racconto: Laird, The Story of Tibet (2006), cited in Wikipedia's 'Ganden Monastery' article; the tooth version comes from the same encyclopaedia ('Je Tsongkhapa') and from unverified exile accounts. The exact date of the cremation could not be established.

Fonte: Laird, Thomas. The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama. Nueva York: Grove Press, 2006.

Insegnamenti

Insegnamenti

Le nozioni che articolano il suo pensiero, spiegate nel loro contesto.

Stages of the path (lamrim)lamrim
The lamrim is a way of organising all the Buddha's teachings as a graded itinerary for a single person. Tsongkhapa inherited it from Atiśa's Lamp for the Path (eleventh century) and the Kadam masters, and gave it its classic form in the Lamrim Chenmo: after reliance on the teacher and reflection on the precious human birth, the practitioner goes through the topics proper to three 'types of person'. The small one seeks a good rebirth and meditates on death, the lower realms, refuge and karma; the middling one seeks liberation and meditates on the suffering of saṃsāra and its causes; the great one seeks buddhahood for others and cultivates bodhicitta, the six perfections and, finally, the union of calm abiding and special insight. The key to the method is that each stage becomes experience before moving to the next, and that no teaching is discarded: everything finds its place on one person's path.

Heir to Atiśa's Kadam tradition; the axis of Geluk training, also adopted with variations by other Tibetan schools.

Fonte: Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665.

The three principal aspects of the pathtres-aspectos-principales
Tsongkhapa summed up the whole path in three dispositions. The first is renunciation or the 'determination to emerge' (nges 'byung): a detachment born not of contempt for the world but of understanding that no achievement within conditioned existence is stable. The second is bodhicitta, the aspiration to awaken for the good of all beings, without which renunciation remains individual salvation. The third is the correct view (yang dag pa'i lta ba) of emptiness, without which neither renunciation nor compassion can cut the root of suffering, which is grasping at intrinsic existence. The teaching does not replace the lamrim but shows its skeleton: everything else is a means of generating these three qualities. Its most famous formulation is the fourteen-stanza letter to Tsakho Önpo Ngawang Drakpa, which ends with an exhortation to withdraw and practise.

A synthesis of the lamrim; received according to tradition as an instruction from Mañjuśrī.

Fonte: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

The object of negationdgag-bya
For Tsongkhapa, the most frequent error in meditating on emptiness is not knowing what is being negated. If one negates too much—the very existence of things, or their causal efficacy—one falls into nihilism and destroys the basis of ethics; if one negates too little—only a permanent substance, or a self invented by philosophies—innate grasping remains intact. Hence his insistence on identifying the object of negation (dgag bya) precisely: intrinsic existence, existence from the thing's own side, which the ordinary mind spontaneously projects onto persons and phenomena. What is negated is not the chair, but the chair as existing by itself. This doctrine, developed in the special-insight section of the Lamrim Chenmo, was at the centre of the great controversies with later Sakya authors such as Gorampa and Shākya Chokden, who accused him of negating too little.

Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka; Tibetan scholastic controversy of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.

Fonte: Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.

Emptiness and dependent originationorigen-dependiente-vacuidad
The core of Tsongkhapa's philosophy is the equivalence between emptiness and dependent origination that Nāgārjuna had formulated and that he reads through Buddhapālita and Candrakīrti. Things are empty of intrinsic existence precisely because they arise in dependence on causes, parts and conceptual designation; and because they are empty, they can arise, change and produce effects. Emptiness is therefore neither a reality hidden behind appearances nor nothingness, but the mode of being of appearances themselves. Hence, according to Tsongkhapa, conventional truth retains its full validity: there are correct and incorrect perceptions, virtuous and harmful actions, although nothing exists by itself. The Praise of Dependent Origination celebrates the Buddha precisely for teaching this compatibility, and the Three Principal Aspects places the completion of analysis in it.

Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka in Candrakīrti's Prāsaṅgika interpretation.

Fonte: Tsongkhapa. Ocean of Reasoning: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Trad. Geshe Ngawang Samten y Jay L. Garfield. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780195147339.

The eight difficult pointsocho-puntos-dificiles
Tsongkhapa held that Candrakīrti's Prāsaṅgika school is distinguished from the others by a set of 'difficult' theses which he fixed in a list of eight, recorded by Gyaltsab in his notes and developed in Illuminating the Intent. According to Sparham and Ehm's summary, they concern the bases (rejection, even conventionally, of self-defined particulars; rejection of the storehouse consciousness; conventional acceptance of external objects), the path (rejection of autonomous reasoning as a means to understand reality; rejection of reflexive awareness; the way the two obscurations exist; the understanding of absence of own-nature by śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas) and the result (how a buddha knows conventional things). The list shaped all Geluk teaching of Madhyamaka and was criticised by other schools, which saw in it a construction more Tibetan than Indian.

Tibetan Madhyamaka doxography.

Fonte: Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.

Union of calm abiding and special insightshamatha-vipashyana
The last two sections of the Lamrim Chenmo deal with calm abiding (śamatha), stable and clear concentration, and special insight (vipaśyanā), the analysis that understands emptiness. Tsongkhapa insists that neither suffices on its own: concentration without analysis does not cut grasping, and analysis without concentration does not stabilise. The goal is their union, in which analysis itself induces stability. In this context he sharply criticises the idea that awakening consists in suspending all thought, which Tibetans associated with the Chinese master Heshang Moheyan, protagonist of the eighth-century Samye debate: for Tsongkhapa the mere absence of concepts is a state of concentration, not an understanding, and confusing the two is one of the greatest dangers of the path.

The final section of the Lamrim Chenmo and the Middle-Length Lamrim; Tibetan polemic against the 'sudden' model attributed to Chan.

Fonte: Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665.

Video

Video

Registrazioni, interviste e documentari. I video vengono riprodotti da YouTube; non sono ospitati qui.

  • Thupten Jinpa PhD - "Tsongkhapa: Philosopher, Teacher and Yogi"

    Conferenza· EN· 138 min

    Tse Chen Ling Center

  • Thubten Jinpa | Tsongkhapa: Philosopher, Teacher & Yogi

    Conferenza· EN· 143 min

    Jamyang Buddhist Centre

  • Tsongkhapa's Vision of Manjushri in Wölkha – Thupten Jinpa PhD

    Conferenza· EN· 90 min

    Tse Chen Ling Center

  • Mystical Dimensions of Tsongkhapa with Thupten Jinpa (Full Talk)

    Conferenza· EN· 43 min

    Sacred Stream

  • Thupten Jinpa on Tsongkhapa and Negating Too Much

    Analisi· EN· 8 min

    Wisdom Publications Inc.Canale ufficiale

  • Robert Thurman - "The Life and Legacy of Lama Tsongkhapa"

    Conferenza· EN· 119 min

    Tse Chen Ling Center

  • What is Tsongkhapa's Essence of True Eloquence? Robert A.F. Thurman Exploring Buddhism

    Conferenza· EN· 117 min

    Tibet House US NYC | Menla Resort OnlineCanale ufficiale

  • “Three Principal Aspects of the Path" & "Concise Stages of the Path to Enlightenment"

    Conferenza· EN· 71 min

    Dalai LamaCanale ufficiale

  • «Los Tres Aspectos Principales del Camino» y el «Lamrim Abreviado», de Tsongkhapa

    Conferenza· ES· 71 min

    El Dalái LamaCanale ufficiale

  • Tsongkhapa's "Praise to Dependent Origination"

    Conferenza· EN· 171 min

    Dalai Lama Archive

  • Day6-pm: Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment

    Conferenza· EN· 117 min

    Dalai LamaCanale ufficiale

  • Las cualidades especiales de las enseñanzas de Lama Tsong Khapa

    Conferenza· ES· 80 min

    FPMT EspañolCanale ufficiale

  • La Vida de Lama Tsongkhapa - Dr. Alexander Berzin

    Registrazione di terzi· ES· 22 min

    Narraciones Budismo

Galleria

Galleria

Immagini con licenza verificata. Ciascuna conserva la sua paternità e la sua attribuzione.

Manoscritti

Manoscritti

Testimoni manoscritti e testi antichi, con il loro custode e le loro condizioni di consultazione.

  • BO · Tibetano (dbu can) · 1388–1419

    རྗེ་ཙོང་ཁ་པའི་གསུང་འབུམ། (gsung 'bum, bkras lhun par rnying)

    Testimone conservato
    Xilografía de las planchas antiguas de Tashi Lhunpo, 18 vols.; reimpresión fotográfica de Dharamsala (Sherig Parkhang), 1997
    Custode
    Buddhist Digital Resource Center (BDRC), copia digital · bdr:MW29193 (índice bdr:O2DB2379)
    Digitalizzazione
    library.bdrc.io/show/bdr:MW29193…
Manoscritti →

Relazioni

Relazioni

Influenze, discepolati e affinità. Si distingue la relazione documentata dalla somiglianza individuata per analisi.

  • Ricevette l'influenza di

    Nāgārjuna

    His philosophy is a reading of Nāgārjuna; the Ocean of Reasoning comments chapter by chapter on the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, and he also annotated the Sixty Stanzas of Reasoning.

    Relazione documentata

  • Ricevette l'influenza di

    Śāntideva

    He taught and annotated the wisdom chapter of the Bodhicaryāvatāra and the Śikṣāsamuccaya (vols. 14 and 16 of his works); Śāntideva is one of the sources of the great-scope lamrim.

    Relazione documentata

  • Ricevette l'influenza di

    Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha

    The Praise of Dependent Origination addresses the Buddha as unsurpassed teacher for teaching dependent origination; the Essence of Eloquence is a hermeneutics of his words.

    Relazione documentata

  • Ricevette l'influenza di

    Milarepa

    A lineage relationship, not a personal one: the six yogas of Nāropa that Tsongkhapa expounded in the Book of Three Inspirations are the cycle Marpa transmitted to Milarepa, which he received at Kagyu centres such as Drikung.

    Relazione documentata

  • Influenzò

    The 14th Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso)

    The 14th Dalai Lama, spiritual head of the Geluk lineage descending from Tsongkhapa through his disciple Gendun Drub (1st Dalai Lama), has taught and commented on the Lamrim Chenmo (From Here to Enlightenment, 2012), the Three Principal Aspects and the Great Exposition of Secret Mantra.

    Relazione documentata

  • Dissentì da

    Bodhidharma

    An indirect, not historical, relationship: the Lamrim Chenmo criticises the concept-free meditation that Tibetan tradition attributed to the Chan master Heshang Moheyan (Samye debate, eighth century), heir of the school that claimed descent from Bodhidharma. Tsongkhapa does not mention Bodhidharma.

    Somiglianza individuata per analisi

  • Discepolo di

    Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö (1349–1412)

    His principal teacher of Madhyamaka and Abhidharma; he dedicated praises, letters and an instruction to him (vols. 2, 12 and 14).

    Relazione documentata

  • Ricevette l'influenza di

    Atiśa Dīpaṃkara Śrījñāna

    The Lamrim Chenmo develops Atiśa's Lamp for the Path to Enlightenment and the Kadam tradition.

    Relazione documentata

  • Ricevette l'influenza di

    Candrakīrti

    His principal authority in Madhyamaka; Illuminating the Intent comments on his Entering the Middle Way.

    Relazione documentata

  • Maestro di

    Gyaltsab Darma Rinchen (1364–1432)

    Chief disciple and first holder of the Ganden throne; he recorded several of his teachings in writing.

    Relazione documentata

  • Maestro di

    Khedrup Gelek Pelzang (1385–1438)

    Disciple and author of his principal biographies; retrospectively, the first Panchen Lama.

    Relazione documentata

  • Maestro di

    Gendun Drub (1391–1474)

    Disciple, founder of Tashi Lhunpo and posthumously recognised as the first Dalai Lama.

    Relazione documentata

  • Ebbe corrispondenza con

    Emperador Yongle (dinastía Ming)

    He invited him to court in 1407 and 1413; Tsongkhapa declined by letter.

    Relazione documentata

Fonti

Fonti

Bibliografia e cataloghi consultati per questa scheda.

  1. Wikidata, «Tsongkhapa», QID Q323439 (VIAF 65296968; LCCN n80017690; BDRC bdr:P64; Treasury of Lives 8986).
  2. Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.
  3. Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.
  4. Buddhist Digital Resource Center (BDRC). gsung 'bum/ tsong kha pa (bkras lhun par rnying / d+ha sar bskyar par brgyab pa), reimpresión de las planchas antiguas de Tashi Lhunpo, Dharamsala, 1997, 18 vols., instancia bdr:MW29193, índice bdr:O2DB2379 (contenido volumen por volumen).
  5. Thurman, Robert A. F. (ed.). The Life and Teachings of Tsong Khapa. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1982; nueva ed. 2006, ISBN 9788186470442. Incluye la traducción de la biografía tradicional y de varias obras breves.
  6. Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665.
  7. Tsongkhapa. Ocean of Reasoning: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Trad. Geshe Ngawang Samten y Jay L. Garfield. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780195147339.
  8. Thurman, Robert A. F. Tsong Khapa's Speech of Gold in the Essence of True Eloquence: Reason and Enlightenment in the Central Philosophy of Tibet. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. ISBN 9780691072852 (reed. como The Central Philosophy of Tibet, 1991, ISBN 9780691020679).
  9. Jinpa, Thupten. Self, Reality and Reason in Tibetan Philosophy: Tsongkhapa's Quest for the Middle Way. Londres: RoutledgeCurzon, 2002.
  10. Ary, Elijah S. Authorized Lives: Biography and the Early Formation of Geluk Identity. Somerville (MA): Wisdom Publications, 2015.
  11. Laird, Thomas. The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama. Nueva York: Grove Press, 2006.
  12. Wikipedia (en). «Je Tsongkhapa», «Ganden Monastery» y «Monlam Prayer Festival». Usadas como índice de traducciones y bibliografía secundaria; contrastadas con t2, t3 y t4.
  13. Wikimedia Commons, API imageinfo (licencia, autor, fecha y descripción de cada fichero citado en images[]).
  14. Open Library (Internet Archive). Registros de ISBN de cada edición citada en works[].
  15. Huc, Évariste-Régis. Souvenirs d'un voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet et la Chine pendant les années 1844, 1845 et 1846. 2 vols. París: Adrien Le Clere, 1850 (descripción de Kumbum y del «árbol de las diez mil imágenes»).
  16. Ium, Michael. «Tsongkhapa as a mahāsiddha». Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 45 (2022): 73–117. doi:10.2143/JIABS.45.0.3291577.
  17. Kilty, Gavin (trad.). The Splendor of an Autumn Moon: The Devotional Verse of Tsongkhapa. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2001. ISBN 9780861711925.
  18. Mullin, Glenn H. Tsongkhapa's Six Yogas of Naropa. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 1996. ISBN 9781559390583.
  19. Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso). From Here to Enlightenment: An Introduction to Tsong-kha-pa's Classic Text The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Ed. y trad. Guy Newland. Boston: Snow Lion, 2012. Trad. esp.: De aquí a la iluminación, Madrid: Gaia Ediciones, 2014, ISBN 9788484454854.
  20. YouTube: conferencias y documentales verificados por oEmbed el 2026-10-25 (detalle en videos[]).
  21. Lotsawa House. «Three Principal Aspects of the Path» (lam gyi gtso bo rnam gsum), texto tibetano con colofón; y presentación de «Prayer to Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö».
Titolare dei diritti
Obra original en dominio público (m. 1419). Las traducciones modernas tienen derechos propios: Shambhala Publications/Snow Lion (Lamrim Chenmo; Gran exposición del mantra secreto; Seis yogas), Wisdom Publications (Iluminación del pensamiento, Lamrim medio, Lámpara de las cinco etapas, ética tántrica), Oxford University Press (Océano de razonamiento), Princeton University Press (Esencia de la elocuencia), SUNY Press, Ediciones Dharma (versión española del Lamrim Chenmo), Gaia Ediciones.

In attesa di conferma

Ciò che questa scheda non ha ancora potuto chiarire. Preferiamo dirlo piuttosto che riempirlo.

  • Sala de lectura: no se ha encontrado ningún texto de Tsongkhapa en dominio público con texto completo en Gutenberg, Wikisource (inglés, chino, multilingüe) ni Internet Archive con OCR limpio. Todas las traducciones occidentales son posteriores a 1970 y la china de Fazun (m. 1980) tiene derechos en la UE y en España. El texto tibetano original (libre en todas partes) solo está en BDRC, que el importador no lee. Revisar si BDRC o el ACIP ofrecen e-textos importables.
  • Ediciones españolas: solo se han verificado en catálogo las de Ediciones Dharma (Lamrim Chenmo, 2000, 2007, 2011; el catálogo no indica qué volumen es cada una) y el comentario del Dalái Lama (Gaia, 2014). No se ha localizado con ISBN una edición española de Los tres aspectos principales, la Alabanza del origen dependiente ni de la Gran exposición del mantra secreto.
  • Las obras secundarias de las obras completas (vols. 1–12, 14–18) se han registrado a partir del índice de BDRC; sus títulos se han traducido y descrito según el título y el género, sin lectura del texto. Algunas identificaciones quedan por confirmar: 01.09 (zhu lan sman mchog), 07.6 («Los cuatrocientos cincuenta»), 11.07 (a tsa la gar b+ha), 14.4 (relación con el Lamrim medio) y 02.3.056 (identificación con Yon tan gzhir gyur ma).
  • Los textos del vol. 1 que son biografías de Tsongkhapa escritas por discípulos (01.01–01.04, entre ellas las de Khedrup) y el colofón de impresión del vol. 13 no se registran como obras suyas; se mencionan en la entrada «gsung-bum».
  • Fechas: ordenación completa (c. 1381) y novicio (c. 1363) proceden de la tradición biográfica resumida en Jinpa 2019; no se ha podido leer el libro directamente. Treasury of Lives (8986) devuelve 403 a clientes automáticos.
  • Citas: el texto tibetano de Los tres aspectos principales se ha cotejado con Lotsawa House; las traducciones al español e inglés son del investigador. La primera estrofa de la Alabanza del origen dependiente se da de memoria y está marcada como «probable»: cotejar con una edición.
  • Relación con Padmasambhava: no se ha documentado ninguna relación directa entre ambos (separados por seis siglos y escuelas distintas); no se registra.
  • Duraciones de vídeo tomadas de la página de resultados de YouTube; el año de publicación no se ha registrado (la API oEmbed no lo devuelve).

Ricerca effettuata il 2026-10-25