Zum Inhalt springen
The ConsciousLibrary

Tantra · Buddhismus · Mahayana · Tibetischer Buddhismus

Tsongkhapa

ཙོང་ཁ་པ་བློ་བཟང་གྲགས་པ། · tsong kha pa blo bzang grags pa · རྗེ་རིན་པོ་ཆེ། · 宗喀巴

1357 – 1419Historisch belegte Person

Tibetischer Mönch, Philosoph und Reformer (1357–1419), geboren in Amdo und zwei Jahrzehnte lang bei Meistern aller Schulen Zentraltibets ausgebildet. Seine Synthese aus klösterlicher Disziplin, begründendem Studium, dem Stufenweg (Lamrim) und dem Tantra sowie seine Prāsaṅgika-Deutung Nāgārjunas begründeten die Gelug-Schule, die um das 1409 gegründete Kloster Ganden entstand und der auch die Dalai Lamas angehören. Seine gesammelten Werke umfassen achtzehn Bände.

Werke
175Werke
Ausgaben
58Ausgaben
Zitate
5Zitate
Videos
13Videos
Bilder
7Bilder
Tsongkhapa, pintura del siglo XVI (Rubin Museum of Art)

Tsongkhapa, pintura del siglo XVI (Rubin Museum of Art) · Public domain

In eigenen Worten

«Without the wisdom that realises how things are, even if you have trained in renunciation and the mind of awakening you cannot cut the root of existence; therefore strive in the means of realising dependent origination.»

Los tres aspectos principales del camino, estrofa 9 (texto tibetano de Lotsawa House; traducción del investigador)

Der zentrale Gedanke

Stages of the path (lamrim): The lamrim is a way of organising all the Buddha's teachings as a graded itinerary for a single person.

Biografie

5 Min. Lesezeit

Unterstützte Übersetzung aus dem spanischen Original, Durchsicht durch einen muttersprachlichen Übersetzer ausstehend.

Ein Mönch aus Amdo

Tsongkhapa wurde 1357 im zehnten Monat des Feuer-Hahn-Jahres in Tsongkha geboren, einer Hirtenlandschaft der Provinz Amdo im Nordosten der tibetischen Welt; nach diesem Ort trägt er den Namen, unter dem ihn die Geschichte kennt. Sein Mönchsname lautete Losang Drakpa, seine Schüler nannten ihn Je Rinpoche, „der kostbare Herr“. Fast alles, was man über seine Kindheit weiß, stammt aus den Lebensbeschreibungen, die eben diese Schüler, allen voran Khedrup Gelek Pelzang, in den Jahren nach seinem Tod verfassten: Ihnen zufolge empfing er mit drei Jahren die Laiengelübde vom vierten Karmapa, Rolpe Dorje, und wurde mit sieben von seinem ersten Lehrer, Chöje Döndrub Rinchen, der ihn in der Kadampa-Tradition erzog, zum Novizen ordiniert.

Zwanzig Lehrjahre

1372, mit sechzehn Jahren, brach er nach Zentraltibet auf, aus dem er nie zurückkehren sollte. Es folgte eine Ausbildung von selbst für jene Zeit außergewöhnlicher Breite: Medizin und Kagyü-Praktiken in Drikung bei Chenga Chökyi Gyalpo, die Vollkommenheit der Weisheit am Kolleg von Nyethang Dewachen, Abhidharma und Mittleren Weg bei dem Sakya-Gelehrten Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö, seinem maßgeblichen Lehrer, und das Kālacakra bei Meistern der Jonang-Tradition. Mit neunzehn bestritt er seine ersten öffentlichen Debatten, um das fünfundzwanzigste Lebensjahr empfing er die volle Ordination. Das Verzeichnis der Unterweisungen, die er erhielt, im ersten Band seiner Werke überliefert, zählt Linien aller Schulen auf – und erklärt, warum die Tradition ihn eher als großen Synthetiker denn als Gründer einer Sekte darstellt.

1388/89 vollendete er sein erstes großes Werk, den Goldenen Kranz der Beredsamkeit, einen monumentalen Kommentar zum Schmuck der klaren Erkenntnis, der ihn als Gelehrten bekannt machte. Doch der junge Scholastiker war mit seinem Verständnis der Leerheit nicht zufrieden. Um 1390 begegnete er Lama Umapa, einem Mystiker aus Osttibet, der den Biographien zufolge als Mittler zu Mañjuśrī, dem Bodhisattva der Weisheit, wirkte; durch ihn und später – immer diesen Berichten nach – unmittelbar soll Tsongkhapa der Gottheit seine philosophischen Zweifel vorgetragen haben. Die Antwort war eine praktische Weisung: das Lehren eine Zeitlang ruhen zu lassen, sich zurückzuziehen und sich zu läutern.

Die Klausur von Wölkha

Ab 1392 zog er sich mit einer kleinen Schar von Schülern, der Überlieferung nach acht, in das Tal von Wölkha südöstlich von Lhasa zurück. Dort, so erzählen seine Biographen, vollzog er Hunderttausende Niederwerfungen vor den fünfunddreißig Buddhas der Beichte, restaurierte die große Maitreya-Statue des Klosters Dzingchi und empfing von dem Meister Lhodrak Namkha Gyaltsen die Kadampa-Unterweisungen über den Stufenweg. Um 1397/98 soll er, nachdem er von Nāgārjuna und dessen Schülern geträumt hatte, bei der Lektüre von Buddhapālitas Kommentar zu den Grundversen vom Mittleren Weg zum endgültigen Verständnis der Leerheit gelangt sein. Träume und Visionen gehören der Hagiographie an; nachprüfbar ist die Wendung seines Werkes zur Prāsaṅgika-Deutung Nāgārjunas, die er bis zuletzt verteidigen sollte, und das Gedicht, das sie feiert, das Lob des abhängigen Entstehens.

Die großen Traktate

1402 vollendete er im Kloster Radreng (Reting), im 11. Jahrhundert von Dromtönpa, einem Schüler Atiśas, gegründet, die Große Darlegung der Stufen des Weges zum Erwachen, das Lamrim Chenmo. Im selben Jahr versammelte er in Namtsé Deng die Mönchsgemeinde, um die Befolgung des Vinaya wiederherzustellen – überzeugt, dass die Disziplin die Bedingung alles Übrigen sei. Es folgten die Traktate über die Ethik des Bodhisattva und die tantrische Ethik (1403), die Große Darlegung des geheimen Mantra (1405), die Essenz der Beredsamkeit und der Ozean der Logik, 1407 und 1408 in der Einsiedelei Sera Chöding verfasst, die Lampe, die die fünf Stufen erhellt (1411), das Mittlere Lamrim (1415) und 1418 die Erhellung des Gedankens, sein letzter großer Kommentar.

Eine Überzeugung durchzieht diese Bücher. Für Tsongkhapa ist das Denken nicht der Feind der Kontemplation, sondern ihr Werkzeug: Die Leerheit muss durch Analyse erkannt werden, und das bloße Anhalten des Denkens führt nicht zu ihr. Die Leerheit zerstört zudem die konventionelle Welt nicht; gerade weil nichts aus sich selbst heraus existiert, bringen Ursachen Wirkungen hervor und hat die Ethik einen Sinn. Daher sein Beharren darauf, das „Objekt der Negation“ genau zu bestimmen, um weder zu wenig noch zu viel zu verneinen, und seine Kritik an jenen, die in Tibet die Leere mit dem Nichts oder die Meditation mit der Abwesenheit von Gedanken verwechselten.

Lhasa, 1409

Sein Ansehen reichte bis an den chinesischen Hof. 1407 und erneut 1413 lud ihn der Yongle-Kaiser der Ming-Dynastie zu sich ein; Tsongkhapa lehnte ab, und sein Antwortschreiben ist unter seinen vermischten Schriften erhalten. An seiner Stelle reiste Jahre später sein Schüler Shakya Yeshe an den Hof. Im ersten Monat des Jahres 1409 eröffnete er unter der Schirmherrschaft des Phagmodrupa-Herrschers Drakpa Gyaltsen im Jokhang von Lhasa das Große Gebetsfest (Mönlam Chenmo), das bis 1959 jedes Jahr begangen werden sollte. Im selben Jahr gründete er auf dem Berg Drok Riwo das Kloster Ganden, „das Freudvolle“, benannt nach dem Reinen Land des Maitreya.

Um Ganden bildete sich die Gemeinschaft, die die Nachwelt Gelug nennen sollte, „die der tugendhaften Tradition“. Seine Schüler vermehrten die Gründungen: Jamyang Chöje Tashi Palden eröffnete 1416 Drepung, Jamchen Chöje Shakya Yeshe 1419 Sera. Gyaltsab Darma Rinchen und Khedrup Gelek Pelzang wurden seine geistigen Nachfolger, und ein weiterer Schüler, Gendün Drub, sollte später als erster Dalai Lama anerkannt werden.

Tod und Erbe

Tsongkhapa starb 1419 in Ganden, am fünfundzwanzigsten Tag des zehnten tibetischen Monats, einem Datum, das die Gelug-Klöster seither mit dem Lichterfest Ganden Ngamchö begehen. Die Überlieferung berichtet, er habe vor seinem Tod Mütze und Mantel an Gyaltsab Je übergeben, den ersten Inhaber des Throns von Ganden. Sein Leichnam, in einem Stupa aus Silber und Gold bewahrt, wurde mehr als fünf Jahrhunderte lang verehrt; nach der Zerstörung des Klosters 1959 und während der Kulturrevolution wurde er verbrannt, und nach dem von Thomas Laird aufgezeichneten Zeugnis wurden nur der Schädel und ein Teil der Asche gerettet.

Wenige Gestalten des tibetischen Buddhismus sind so sehr von Legenden umrankt worden. 1845 fand der französische Missionar Évariste Huc in Kumbum, dem an seinem Geburtsort errichteten Kloster, einen Baum, dessen Blätter, wie die Mönche sagten, heilige Schriftzeichen zeigten, seit seine Mutter dort ihr Haar hingeworfen hatte; Huc sah ihn und wusste ihn nicht zu erklären. Die Biographien sprechen von Visionen Mañjuśrīs und wunderbaren Zeichen; seine eigenen Schriften hingegen zeigen einen unermüdlichen Leser der indischen Texte, anspruchsvoll gegenüber den Quellen, der schrieb, damit andere selbst denken konnten. Dieses Werk, achtzehn Bände in der Ausgabe von Tashilhünpo, bildet bis heute den Kern der Ausbildung in den Gelug-Klöstern und der Lehren des gegenwärtigen Dalai Lama.

Quellen: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465. · Thurman, Robert A. F. (ed.). The Life and Teachings of Tsong Khapa. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1982; nueva ed. 2006, ISBN 9788186470442. Incluye la traducción de la biografía tradicional y de varias obras breves. · Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665. · Tsongkhapa. Ocean of Reasoning: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Trad. Geshe Ngawang Samten y Jay L. Garfield. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780195147339. · Thurman, Robert A. F. Tsong Khapa's Speech of Gold in the Essence of True Eloquence: Reason and Enlightenment in the Central Philosophy of Tibet. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. ISBN 9780691072852 (reed. como The Central Philosophy of Tibet, 1991, ISBN 9780691020679).

Zeitleiste

Das Leben, Jahr für Jahr

Jeder Punkt ist ein belegtes Ereignis. Klicken Sie, um es mit Quelle und Grad der Gewissheit zu lesen.

  1. 1357 · 0 Jahre

    Birth

    Born in the tenth month of the fire-bird year at Tsongkha (Amdo), into a herding family.

    Belegt

  2. um 1360 · 3 Jahre

    Lay vows from the fourth Karmapa

    According to his biographies he receives lay vows and the name Kunga Nyingpo from the fourth Karmapa, Rolpe Dorje.

    Überlieferung

  3. um 1363 · 7 Jahre

    Novice ordination

    He is ordained a novice by Chöje Döndrub Rinchen, his first teacher, receiving the name Losang Drakpa.

    Überlieferung

  4. 1372 · 16 Jahre

    Departure for central Tibet

    He leaves Amdo to study in central Tibet and will never return home. He reaches Drikung in the autumn of 1373.

    Belegt

  5. 1375 · 19 Jahre

    First public debates

    He holds his first formal debates on the great treatises.

    Belegt

  6. um 1381 · 25 Jahre

    Full ordination

    He receives full monastic ordination at about twenty-five.

    Wahrscheinlich

  7. um 1389 · 32 Jahre

    The Golden Garland

    He completes his commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra (1388–1389), his first major work; that year he makes a Cakrasaṃvara retreat in Yarlung.

    Belegt

  8. um 1390 · 33 Jahre

    Meeting Lama Umapa

    He meets the mystic Umapa, through whom, according to the biographies, he consults Mañjuśrī.

    Überlieferung

  9. um 1392 · 35 Jahre

    The Wölkha retreat

    He withdraws with eight disciples to Wölkha; prostrations, purification and restoration of the Dzingchi Maitreya.

    Überlieferung

  10. um 1397 · 40 Jahre

    Insight into emptiness

    After dreaming of Nāgārjuna and his disciples he attains, according to tradition, a definitive understanding of emptiness while reading Buddhapālita; he composes the Praise of Dependent Origination.

    Überlieferung

  11. 1402 · 45 Jahre

    The Lamrim Chenmo

    He completes the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path and gathers the community at Namtsé Deng to restore the vinaya.

    Belegt

  12. 1405 · 48 Jahre

    The Ngagrim Chenmo

    He completes the Great Exposition of Secret Mantra.

    Belegt

  13. 1407 · 50 Jahre

    The Yongle emperor's invitation; the Essence of Eloquence

    He declines the invitation to the Ming court (repeated in 1413) and composes the Essence of Eloquence and the Ocean of Reasoning at Sera Chöding (1407–1408).

    Belegt

  14. 1409 · 52 Jahre

    Great Prayer Festival and founding of Ganden

    He institutes the Monlam Chenmo at the Jokhang in the first month, with Drakpa Gyaltsen's patronage, and founds Ganden monastery.

    Belegt

  15. 1415 · 58 Jahre

    The Middle-Length Lamrim

    He composes the middle-length version of the stages of the path.

    Belegt

  16. 1416 · 59 Jahre

    Founding of Drepung

    His disciple Jamyang Chöje Tashi Palden founds Drepung.

    Belegt

  17. 1418 · 61 Jahre

    Illuminating the Intent

    He composes his last great commentary, on Candrakīrti's Entering the Middle Way.

    Belegt

  18. 1419 · 62 Jahre

    Death

    He dies at Ganden on the 25th day of the tenth Tibetan month; that year his disciple Shakya Yeshe founds Sera.

    Belegt

  19. 1845

    Huc at Kumbum

    The missionary Évariste Huc describes Kumbum's 'tree of ten thousand images' and the legend of its origin.

    Belegt

  20. um 1966

    Destruction of the tomb

    After Ganden's destruction (1959) and during the Cultural Revolution his preserved body is burned; remains were saved according to testimonies.

    Belegt

Werke

Grundlegende Werke

Die Werke, ohne die sich das Vermächtnis nicht verstehen lässt.

Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment (Lamrim Chenmo) — Tsongkhapa

Schriftliches Werk · 1402

Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment (Lamrim Chenmo)

སྐྱེས་བུ་གསུམ་གྱི་ཉམས་སུ་བླང་བའི་རིམ་པ་ཐམས་ཅད་ཚང་བར་སྟོན་པའི་བྱང་ཆུབ་ལམ་གྱི་རིམ་པ། (skyes bu gsum gyi nyams su blang ba'i rim pa thams cad tshang bar ston pa'i byang chub lam gyi rim pa)

His most widely read work and the founding text of the Geluk school. Finished in 1402 at Radreng (Reting) monastery, it expands Atiśa's Lamp for the Path into a complete course for the 'three types of person': one who seeks a good rebirth, one who seeks liberation and one who aspires to buddhahood for the sake of others. Its last two sections, on calm abiding (śamatha) and special insight (vipaśyanā), contain his mature account of emptiness and of the 'object of negation'. It fills vol. 13 (pa) of the collected works.

Nicht verfügbar Das Buch ansehen

11 Ausgaben

Great Exposition of Secret Mantra (Ngagrim Chenmo) — Tsongkhapa

Schriftliches Werk · 1405

Great Exposition of Secret Mantra (Ngagrim Chenmo)

རྒྱལ་བ་ཁྱབ་བདག་རྡོ་རྗེ་འཆང་ཆེན་པོའི་ལམ་གྱི་རིམ་པ་གསང་བ་ཀུན་གྱི་གནད་རྣམ་པར་ཕྱེ་བ། (rgyal ba khyab bdag rdo rje 'chang chen po'i lam gyi rim pa gsang ba kun gyi gnad rnam par phye ba)

The tantric counterpart of the Lamrim Chenmo, completed in 1405. It sets out systematically the four classes of tantra (action, performance, yoga and highest yoga), the difference between the perfection vehicle and the mantra vehicle, the requirements of initiation and vows, deity yoga and the generation and completion stages of Guhyasamāja. Its central thesis is that tantra does not replace renunciation, bodhicitta and the view of emptiness but presupposes them. It fills vol. 3 (ga).

Nicht verfügbar Das Buch ansehen

7 Ausgaben

Essence of Eloquence: Treatise Differentiating the Interpretable and the Definitive — Tsongkhapa

Schriftliches Werk · 1407

Essence of Eloquence: Treatise Differentiating the Interpretable and the Definitive

དྲང་བ་དང་ངེས་པའི་དོན་རྣམ་པར་འབྱེད་པའི་བསྟན་བཅོས་ལེགས་བཤད་སྙིང་པོ། (drang ba dang nges pa'i don rnam par 'byed pa'i bstan bcos legs bshad snying po)

Composed in 1407–1408 at the Sera Chöding hermitage above Lhasa, it is his hermeneutical work: how to decide which of the Buddha's teachings are to be taken literally and which require interpretation. It goes through the Mind-Only (Yogācāra) reading of the Saṃdhinirmocana, then those of Bhāviveka and Candrakīrti within Madhyamaka, concluding in favour of the Prāsaṅgika approach. Tradition regards it as the most difficult of his books. Vol. 14 (pha).

Nicht verfügbar Das Buch ansehen

3 Ausgaben

The Three Principal Aspects of the Path — Tsongkhapa

Briefwechsel

The Three Principal Aspects of the Path

ལམ་གྱི་གཙོ་བོ་རྣམ་གསུམ། (lam gyi gtso bo rnam gsum)

Fourteen stanzas sent as a letter to his disciple Tsakho Önpo Ngawang Drakpa in Gyalmorong (eastern Tibet), and preserved among the miscellaneous writings (vol. 2, kha). They reduce the whole path to three dispositions: renunciation or the determination to be free, bodhicitta, and the correct view of emptiness understood as compatible with dependent origination. It is probably the most widely taught and memorised text by Tsongkhapa in the Tibetan world.

Nicht verfügbar Das Buch ansehen

4 Ausgaben

Das gesamte Werk (175)

Alle 175 Werke in der Bibliothek ansehen

Zitate

Zitate, die in einem bestimmten Werk nachgewiesen sind. Jedes trägt seine Herkunft und seinen Grad an Verlässlichkeit.

Without the wisdom that realises how things are, even if you have trained in renunciation and the mind of awakening you cannot cut the root of existence; therefore strive in the means of realising dependent origination.

གནས་ལུགས་རྟོགས་པའི་ཤེས་རབ་མི་ལྡན་ན། །ངེས་འབྱུང་བྱང་ཆུབ་སེམས་ལ་གོམས་བྱས་ཀྱང༌། །སྲིད་པའི་རྩ་བ་བཅད་པར་མི་ནུས་པས། །དེ་ཕྱིར་རྟེན་འབྲེལ་རྟོགས་པའི་ཐབས་ལ་འབད། །

GeprüftLos tres aspectos principales del camino, estrofa 9 (texto tibetano de Lotsawa House; traducción del investigador)

1 / 5
Apokryphe Zitate oder Zitate umstrittener Zuschreibung (1)
  • «The more you understand emptiness, the more respect you will have for the law of cause and effect.»

    Circulates online as a literal quotation from Tsongkhapa. It has not been located in this form in any of his works; it is a popular paraphrase of an idea he does develop (the compatibility of emptiness and dependent origination in the Three Principal Aspects and the Praise of Dependent Origination).

Letzte Worte

Es gibt keine überprüfbaren Aufzeichnungen der letzten Worte.

No reliable last words survive. His disciples' biographies describe his death at Ganden, in meditation, on the 25th of the tenth month of 1419, and tradition adds that he handed his hat and cloak to Gyaltsab Je as a sign of succession, but they transmit no final sentence that can be attributed to him.

Quelle: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Fragen

Was das Werk beantwortet

Zwölf große Fragen der Menschheit und was sich aus den Texten darauf antworten lässt, mit Belegen. Wir legen niemandem Worte in den Mund.

  • Was ist das Absolute? Gibt es Gott?

    Nothing escapes emptiness, neither a god nor an Absolute

    Kein SchöpfergottAus der Lehre abgeleitet

    Tsongkhapa does not devote a treatise to denying God: together with all the Indian scholasticism he comments on, he takes for granted the Buddhist critique of an eternal creator. What occupies his work is more radical. In the Praise of Dependent Origination he venerates the Buddha precisely for having seen and taught that everything arises dependently, and in the section on special insight in the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path he carefully defines the «object of negation»: intrinsic existence, which nothing possesses. Neither a god nor an impersonal Absolute escapes this analysis; emptiness itself is empty. The buddhas, to whom he addresses prayers and praises, are not creators but beings who have completed the path; taking refuge in them is justified because they teach how to be liberated, not because they govern the world.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Wer bin ich? Gibt es ein wahres Selbst?

    The self exists only as a designation; what is negated is its intrinsic existence

    Es gibt kein bleibendes SelbstAusdrücklich gesagt

    Tsongkhapa devoted much of his work to specifying exactly what is negated when one says there is no self. In the section on special insight in the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path he distinguishes the conventional self, which acts, remembers and reaps the fruits of its deeds, from the self that exists by itself, which is the «object of negation». Negating too much leads to nihilism and destroys ethics; negating too little leaves clinging intact. The person exists as a mere designation on the aggregates, and precisely for that reason it functions: if it had its own existence it could not change. The Three Principal Aspects of the Path sums up the consequence: without the wisdom that understands how things are, neither renunciation nor the mind of awakening cuts the root of existence.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Warum leiden wir?

    The root of saṃsāra is clinging to an existence that nothing has

    Begehren und AnhaftenAusdrücklich gesagt

    The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path devotes its middle section to contemplating the suffering of cyclic existence in order to awaken renunciation: the suffering of pain, that of change and the one that pervades all that is conditioned. Its origin is the afflictions and the karma they impel, and among them attachment keeps the wheel turning. But Tsongkhapa insists that the root is not cut by renunciation or compassion alone: in the Three Principal Aspects of the Path he warns that, without the wisdom that understands how things are, the root of existence cannot be cut (verse 9). That root is the ignorance that clings to self and things as though they existed intrinsically. We suffer because we cling to what we believe solid.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Was geschieht nach dem Tod?

    Death is certain, its hour uncertain, and only the Dharma helps

    Wiedergeburt nach dem KarmaAusdrücklich gesagt

    In the section on the initial scope of the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path, Tsongkhapa arranges the meditation on death around three roots: death is certain, its moment uncertain, and at that moment nothing helps except the Dharma. From there he moves to the sufferings of the lower destinies, to refuge and to the law of karma, because what determines the next birth is one's actions. Rebirth is not for him an inherited, unexamined belief: mind does not arise from matter but from a previous instant of the same nature, which requires a continuity before and after this life. His work also includes tantric instructions for the moment of death, such as the transference of consciousness.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Wie erlangt man Befreiung oder Erlösung?

    A path in stages: renunciation, the mind of awakening and correct view

    Durch disziplinierte ÜbungAusdrücklich gesagt

    Tsongkhapa's work is the most systematic exposition of the gradual path in Tibetan Buddhism. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path arranges practice into three scopes: that of one who seeks a good rebirth, that of one who seeks liberation from the cycle and that of one who aspires to buddhahood for the good of all. The Three Principal Aspects of the Path condenses it into renunciation, the mind of awakening and correct view of emptiness, and warns that without the last the other two do not cut the root. Wisdom is not a sudden intuition: it is cultivated by uniting mental calm and special insight, with study, reflection and analytical meditation. Monastic ethics and, at its culmination, tantra complete a path that demands discipline and perseverance.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Braucht es einen Lehrer?

    Relying on the master is the root of the path; examining him first, too

    UnverzichtbarAusdrücklich gesagt

    The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path opens its practical exposition with how to rely on the spiritual master, which it presents as the root of the whole path. Tsongkhapa lists the qualities the master must have, drawing on the Ornament of the Sūtras: disciplined, serene, pacified, wiser than the disciple, with knowledge of emptiness and compassion. He asks the disciple to examine him before committing and then to serve him in thought and deed. In the tantric domain, his commentary on the Fifty Verses on the Master regulates the relationship in detail. The figure of the master is indispensable because the path is long and subtle; but it does not cancel critical study, which he himself practised rigorously on the Indian texts.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Ist die Welt wirklich?

    Appearance dispels the extreme of existence; emptiness, that of nothingness

    Ein Geflecht von Ursachen ohne SubstanzAusdrücklich gesagt

    Tsongkhapa made dependent origination the centre of his work and of his devotion. In the Praise of Dependent Origination he venerates the Buddha for having seen and taught it, and in the Three Principal Aspects of the Path he formulates his most characteristic thesis: as long as the understanding of appearances, which arise dependently and do not deceive, and that of emptiness present themselves separately, one has not yet understood the Buddha's intent (verse 11). The two imply each other: precisely because things arise dependently they are empty, and because they are empty they can arise and function. Hence, he adds, appearance dispels the extreme of existence and emptiness that of non-existence (verse 13). The world is fully valid conventionally and lacks intrinsic existence.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Was ist Liebe?

    See all as mothers swept by four rivers and take on their liberation

    Grenzenloses MitgefühlAusdrücklich gesagt

    In the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path, Tsongkhapa systematised the two Indian and Tibetan methods for generating the mind of awakening: the seven instructions of cause and effect, which begin by recognising all beings as mothers in previous lives, remembering their kindness and wishing to repay it, and the method of equalising and exchanging self with others, inherited from Śāntideva. From love, which wishes their happiness, arises compassion, which cannot bear their suffering, and from it the extraordinary intention to take their liberation upon oneself. The Three Principal Aspects of the Path condenses it in an image: beings are swept along by the four rivers of birth, ageing, sickness and death, and seeing this awakens the supreme mind.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Sind wir frei, oder ist alles vorherbestimmt?

    Karma is certain and grows, but it can be purified and redirected

    Karma und WahlAusdrücklich gesagt

    In the section on the initial scope of the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path, Tsongkhapa sets out the laws of karma as the Indian tradition records them: it is certain, because happiness arises from virtue and suffering from non-virtue; it multiplies, because a small act can yield a great fruit; one does not meet what one has not done; and what has been done is not lost by itself. But this determinism is not closed: the same treatise teaches how to purify negative karma through regret, the antidote, the resolve not to repeat it and refuge. Emptiness, far from cancelling causality, is what makes it possible, because only what lacks intrinsic existence can change. Present choice is real on the conventional level.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Wozu meditieren oder beten?

    Unite mental calm and special insight; meditation is also analysis

    Die Wirklichkeit sehen, wie sie istAusdrücklich gesagt

    The last two sections of the Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path are devoted to mental calm (śamatha) and special insight (vipaśyanā). Tsongkhapa explains how to develop stable concentration, without laxity or agitation, and how to use it to examine the nature of things. His most characteristic thesis is that analytical meditation is not an obstacle to concentration but part of it: whoever merely fixes the mind without examining does not cut the root of cyclic existence. Special insight consists in understanding emptiness with a concentrated mind, until calm and analysis sustain each other. Prayer, supplications to the lineage and tantric practice have their place, but in the service of that understanding.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Kann die Vernunft das Letzte erkennen?

    Reason decides which scripture is definitive and leads to emptiness

    Schrift und DenkenAusdrücklich gesagt

    Tsongkhapa grants reason a larger role than almost any other Tibetan Buddhist author. In the Essence of Eloquence he addresses a classic problem: the sūtras say different things, and one must distinguish those of interpretable meaning from those of definitive meaning. That distinction cannot be made by appeal to another scripture, which would be circular, but by reasoning. Scripture is a source of knowledge, but reason interprets it. Likewise, emptiness is first understood inferentially, through analysis, and only afterwards, by meditative familiarisation, directly and non-conceptually. Hence he criticises those who scorn analysis in the name of a thought-free experience: without reasoning, meditation does not cut the root of ignorance.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen
  • Sich von der Welt zurückziehen oder sie verwandeln?

    Withdraw into solitude and fulfil your purpose soon; then reform the community

    Sich zurückziehen, um zu findenAusdrücklich gesagt

    The Three Principal Aspects of the Path ends with an exhortation: when you have understood the essential points for yourself, withdraw into solitude, rouse the strength of effort and soon fulfil your ultimate purpose (verse 14). Tsongkhapa practised what he taught: he spent years in retreat with a small group of disciples before his maturity as a teacher. But his life is not exhausted in retreat. He restored monastic discipline, founded the monastery of Ganden, instituted the Great Prayer of Lhasa in 1409, with rules he himself set, and wrote letters of advice to rulers and to the Ming emperor. Retreat is the condition of realisation; the well-ordered monastic community is the place where that realisation is preserved and transmitted.

    Diese Frage mit anderen Meistern vergleichen

Anekdoten und Erzählungen

Anekdoten und Erzählungen

Zeugnis1845–1846

The tree of ten thousand images

When Tsongkhapa was three—so runs the legend the monks of Kumbum told the Lazarist missionary Évariste Huc—his mother shaved his head so that he could take up the religious life and threw the hair outside the tent. From it sprang a tree of fragrant wood on whose leaves a letter of Tibet's sacred script appeared, engraved. Centuries later the monastery of Kumbum, whose name means 'a hundred thousand images', was built on the spot. Huc and his companion Joseph Gabet spent several months there from 1845 and set out to see the marvel with sceptical eyes. They found it: an old tree, protected by a wall, on whose leaves, branches and bark well-formed Tibetan characters could be made out, more or less complete according to the age of the leaf. He wrote that they searched in vain for some fraud and gave up trying to explain it. The passage, one of the most quoted in his Souvenirs, made Kumbum known in Europe and was debated by other travellers for decades.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Huc, Souvenirs d'un voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet et la Chine (1850), vol. II, chapter on Kumbum; English translation by William Hazlitt (1852), vol. 2, 'The Tree of Ten Thousand Images' (Project Gutenberg no. 33269). The legend of the tree's birth is hagiographic; the description of the tree is Huc's direct testimony. Huc's closing comment is summarised, not quoted.

Quelle: Huc, Évariste-Régis. Souvenirs d'un voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet et la Chine pendant les années 1844, 1845 et 1846. 2 vols. París: Adrien Le Clere, 1850 (descripción de Kumbum y del «árbol de las diez mil imágenes»).

Hagiographische Erzählungc. 1390–1398

Questions to Mañjuśrī

Around 1390, already a recognised scholar, Tsongkhapa met Lama Umapa, a yogi from eastern Tibet who, it was said, had seen Mañjuśrī, the bodhisattva of wisdom, since childhood. His disciples' biographies relate that Tsongkhapa began to put his hardest questions about emptiness through him and that the answers unsettled him: none of the positions he knew—neither that of the great Sakya masters nor that of the Jonang—was correct. Later, the same accounts say, he no longer needed an intermediary. The deity's advice was surprisingly practical: to stop teaching for a time, withdraw with a few disciples and accumulate merit and purification, for understanding would come from the union of practice, study of the Indian texts and reflection. The episode explains Mañjuśrī's importance in Tsongkhapa's iconography, which shows the deity's sword and book on his shoulders.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Khedrup Gelek Pelzang's biographies, especially the 'secret' one (gsang ba'i rnam thar, vol. 1 of the collected works); summarised and analysed in Jinpa 2019, chs. 5–7. Tsongkhapa left a note on the signs seen at Wölkha (bka' 'bum thor bu 02.3.037) and a letter to Umapa (02.3.045).

Quelle: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Hagiographische Erzählung1392–1393

The prostrations of Wölkha

The retreat Tsongkhapa began in 1392 in the Wölkha valley with eight disciples has become the Geluk model of purification. Traditional accounts measure his effort in millions of prostrations before the thirty-five confession buddhas—thirty-five sets of a hundred thousand, it is often said—and nearly two million maṇḍala offerings, until the stone on which he prostrated was marked and his hand wore down the offering base. The figures have the symbolic precision of hagiography: thirty-five echoes the number of confession buddhas, and their function is to teach that philosophical understanding requires a preparation of the heart. What his works do document is the importance he gave to the practice: his tantric writings include a visualisation of the thirty-five buddhas, and during those years he restored the Maitreya image at the nearby monastery of Dzingchi.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Traditional biographies (Khedrup) and their oral circulation in Geluk monasteries; Jinpa 2019 discusses the retreat. The specific figures come from oral tradition and later biographies, not from Tsongkhapa's writings.

Quelle: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Hagiographische Erzählungc. 1397–1398

The dream of Nāgārjuna

According to the biographies, one night in 1397 or 1398, still at Wölkha, Tsongkhapa dreamed of Nāgārjuna and his five Indian disciples discussing emptiness. One of them, Buddhapālita, came up to him and touched his head with a book. The next day, while reading precisely Buddhapālita's commentary on the Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way, he reached chapter eighteen, the examination of the self, and the doubt that had accompanied him for years dissolved: he understood that emptiness is not nothingness but the absence of intrinsic existence in the very things that arise dependently. That same understanding, tradition says, inspired the Praise of Dependent Origination, in which he celebrates the Buddha for teaching dependent origination as the reason that establishes emptiness. The dream is hagiographic; the doctrinal turn towards Buddhapālita and Candrakīrti, by contrast, is visible throughout his later work.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Khedrup Gelek Pelzang's biography (dad pa'i 'jug ngogs); Jinpa 2019; Thurman (ed.) 1982. The dating varies between 1397 and 1398 according to the sources.

Quelle: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Belegt1407–1414

The emperor's invitation

In 1407 an embassy from the Yongle emperor, the third Ming sovereign, reached central Tibet with an invitation for Tsongkhapa to visit the Chinese court. It was an offer of enormous prestige: that same year the fifth Karmapa, Deshin Shekpa, had officiated before the emperor in Nanjing. Tsongkhapa declined. His reply, preserved among his miscellaneous writings as a letter 'to the great sovereign of the Ming', courteously pleads that he cannot undertake the journey. The invitation was repeated in 1413, and again he refused; he sent his disciple Shakya Yeshe instead, who was received by the emperor and, on his return, founded Sera monastery in 1419. The episode is one of the best documented of his life and shows the distance he kept from power: he accepted the patronage of Tibetan rulers for the Great Prayer and for Ganden, but would not become an imperial chaplain.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Sparham and Ehm (SEP) give the invitations of 1407 and 1413; the letter appears in the bka' 'bum thor bu (BDRC index 02.3.110). Shakya Yeshe's journey to court and the founding of Sera are documented in Geluk historiography and Chinese sources.

Quelle: Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.

Mündliche Überlieferungfinales del s. XIV

The prayer that returned to its author

The most recited stanza in Geluk Buddhism, the Migtsema, invokes Tsongkhapa as Avalokiteśvara, source of objectless compassion, as Mañjuśrī, lord of stainless wisdom, and as Vajrapāṇi, destroyer of Māra's hosts. According to tradition, the text was not born for him. Tsongkhapa is said to have composed it in honour of his teacher Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö, placing his name in the last line; Rendawa, on reading it, replied that those qualities better suited his disciple, changed the name and sent it back. Ever since, the stanza has been addressed to 'Tsongkhapa Losang Drakpa'. The story condenses a real, documented relationship—Rendawa was his principal Madhyamaka teacher, and Tsongkhapa dedicated several praises and letters to him—and an ideal: the master who recognises that the disciple has surpassed him.

Herkunft der Erzählung: An account from the Geluk tradition, recorded by Jinpa 2019 and by Lotsawa House in its introduction to the 'Prayer to Rendawa'. The praises to Rendawa appear in the bka' 'bum thor bu (02.3.004–006).

Quelle: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

Umstritten1959–1969

What remained of his body

For more than five centuries Tsongkhapa's body, preserved and covered in gold, rested in a great stūpa at Ganden, the Serdung, a pilgrimage centre for the whole Geluk world. Ganden was razed after the 1959 uprising and its buildings were dynamited during the Cultural Revolution. According to the account gathered by the journalist Thomas Laird, Red Guards forced a monk, Bomi Rinpoche, to carry the body to the pyre; the monk managed to save the skull and part of the ashes, which are kept today in the rebuilt stūpa. Another version, circulated in exile, holds that only a tooth survived, whose clay impressions were secretly distributed among the faithful. The two versions agree in essentials: Tibet's most venerated relic was destroyed and what little was saved was saved by its devotees.

Herkunft der Erzählung: Laird, The Story of Tibet (2006), cited in Wikipedia's 'Ganden Monastery' article; the tooth version comes from the same encyclopaedia ('Je Tsongkhapa') and from unverified exile accounts. The exact date of the cremation could not be established.

Quelle: Laird, Thomas. The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama. Nueva York: Grove Press, 2006.

Lehren

Lehren

Die Begriffe, die das Denken gliedern, in ihrem Zusammenhang erklärt.

Stages of the path (lamrim)lamrim
The lamrim is a way of organising all the Buddha's teachings as a graded itinerary for a single person. Tsongkhapa inherited it from Atiśa's Lamp for the Path (eleventh century) and the Kadam masters, and gave it its classic form in the Lamrim Chenmo: after reliance on the teacher and reflection on the precious human birth, the practitioner goes through the topics proper to three 'types of person'. The small one seeks a good rebirth and meditates on death, the lower realms, refuge and karma; the middling one seeks liberation and meditates on the suffering of saṃsāra and its causes; the great one seeks buddhahood for others and cultivates bodhicitta, the six perfections and, finally, the union of calm abiding and special insight. The key to the method is that each stage becomes experience before moving to the next, and that no teaching is discarded: everything finds its place on one person's path.

Heir to Atiśa's Kadam tradition; the axis of Geluk training, also adopted with variations by other Tibetan schools.

Quelle: Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665.

The three principal aspects of the pathtres-aspectos-principales
Tsongkhapa summed up the whole path in three dispositions. The first is renunciation or the 'determination to emerge' (nges 'byung): a detachment born not of contempt for the world but of understanding that no achievement within conditioned existence is stable. The second is bodhicitta, the aspiration to awaken for the good of all beings, without which renunciation remains individual salvation. The third is the correct view (yang dag pa'i lta ba) of emptiness, without which neither renunciation nor compassion can cut the root of suffering, which is grasping at intrinsic existence. The teaching does not replace the lamrim but shows its skeleton: everything else is a means of generating these three qualities. Its most famous formulation is the fourteen-stanza letter to Tsakho Önpo Ngawang Drakpa, which ends with an exhortation to withdraw and practise.

A synthesis of the lamrim; received according to tradition as an instruction from Mañjuśrī.

Quelle: Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.

The object of negationdgag-bya
For Tsongkhapa, the most frequent error in meditating on emptiness is not knowing what is being negated. If one negates too much—the very existence of things, or their causal efficacy—one falls into nihilism and destroys the basis of ethics; if one negates too little—only a permanent substance, or a self invented by philosophies—innate grasping remains intact. Hence his insistence on identifying the object of negation (dgag bya) precisely: intrinsic existence, existence from the thing's own side, which the ordinary mind spontaneously projects onto persons and phenomena. What is negated is not the chair, but the chair as existing by itself. This doctrine, developed in the special-insight section of the Lamrim Chenmo, was at the centre of the great controversies with later Sakya authors such as Gorampa and Shākya Chokden, who accused him of negating too little.

Prāsaṅgika Madhyamaka; Tibetan scholastic controversy of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.

Quelle: Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.

Emptiness and dependent originationorigen-dependiente-vacuidad
The core of Tsongkhapa's philosophy is the equivalence between emptiness and dependent origination that Nāgārjuna had formulated and that he reads through Buddhapālita and Candrakīrti. Things are empty of intrinsic existence precisely because they arise in dependence on causes, parts and conceptual designation; and because they are empty, they can arise, change and produce effects. Emptiness is therefore neither a reality hidden behind appearances nor nothingness, but the mode of being of appearances themselves. Hence, according to Tsongkhapa, conventional truth retains its full validity: there are correct and incorrect perceptions, virtuous and harmful actions, although nothing exists by itself. The Praise of Dependent Origination celebrates the Buddha precisely for teaching this compatibility, and the Three Principal Aspects places the completion of analysis in it.

Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka in Candrakīrti's Prāsaṅgika interpretation.

Quelle: Tsongkhapa. Ocean of Reasoning: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Trad. Geshe Ngawang Samten y Jay L. Garfield. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780195147339.

The eight difficult pointsocho-puntos-dificiles
Tsongkhapa held that Candrakīrti's Prāsaṅgika school is distinguished from the others by a set of 'difficult' theses which he fixed in a list of eight, recorded by Gyaltsab in his notes and developed in Illuminating the Intent. According to Sparham and Ehm's summary, they concern the bases (rejection, even conventionally, of self-defined particulars; rejection of the storehouse consciousness; conventional acceptance of external objects), the path (rejection of autonomous reasoning as a means to understand reality; rejection of reflexive awareness; the way the two obscurations exist; the understanding of absence of own-nature by śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas) and the result (how a buddha knows conventional things). The list shaped all Geluk teaching of Madhyamaka and was criticised by other schools, which saw in it a construction more Tibetan than Indian.

Tibetan Madhyamaka doxography.

Quelle: Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.

Union of calm abiding and special insightshamatha-vipashyana
The last two sections of the Lamrim Chenmo deal with calm abiding (śamatha), stable and clear concentration, and special insight (vipaśyanā), the analysis that understands emptiness. Tsongkhapa insists that neither suffices on its own: concentration without analysis does not cut grasping, and analysis without concentration does not stabilise. The goal is their union, in which analysis itself induces stability. In this context he sharply criticises the idea that awakening consists in suspending all thought, which Tibetans associated with the Chinese master Heshang Moheyan, protagonist of the eighth-century Samye debate: for Tsongkhapa the mere absence of concepts is a state of concentration, not an understanding, and confusing the two is one of the greatest dangers of the path.

The final section of the Lamrim Chenmo and the Middle-Length Lamrim; Tibetan polemic against the 'sudden' model attributed to Chan.

Quelle: Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665.

Videos

Videos

Aufnahmen, Gespräche und Dokumentarfilme. Die Videos werden von YouTube wiedergegeben; sie werden nicht hier gespeichert.

  • Thupten Jinpa PhD - "Tsongkhapa: Philosopher, Teacher and Yogi"

    Vortrag· EN· 138 min

    Tse Chen Ling Center

  • Thubten Jinpa | Tsongkhapa: Philosopher, Teacher & Yogi

    Vortrag· EN· 143 min

    Jamyang Buddhist Centre

  • Tsongkhapa's Vision of Manjushri in Wölkha – Thupten Jinpa PhD

    Vortrag· EN· 90 min

    Tse Chen Ling Center

  • Mystical Dimensions of Tsongkhapa with Thupten Jinpa (Full Talk)

    Vortrag· EN· 43 min

    Sacred Stream

  • Thupten Jinpa on Tsongkhapa and Negating Too Much

    Analyse· EN· 8 min

    Wisdom Publications Inc.Offizieller Kanal

  • Robert Thurman - "The Life and Legacy of Lama Tsongkhapa"

    Vortrag· EN· 119 min

    Tse Chen Ling Center

  • What is Tsongkhapa's Essence of True Eloquence? Robert A.F. Thurman Exploring Buddhism

    Vortrag· EN· 117 min

    Tibet House US NYC | Menla Resort OnlineOffizieller Kanal

  • “Three Principal Aspects of the Path" & "Concise Stages of the Path to Enlightenment"

    Vortrag· EN· 71 min

    Dalai LamaOffizieller Kanal

  • «Los Tres Aspectos Principales del Camino» y el «Lamrim Abreviado», de Tsongkhapa

    Vortrag· ES· 71 min

    El Dalái LamaOffizieller Kanal

  • Tsongkhapa's "Praise to Dependent Origination"

    Vortrag· EN· 171 min

    Dalai Lama Archive

  • Day6-pm: Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment

    Vortrag· EN· 117 min

    Dalai LamaOffizieller Kanal

  • Las cualidades especiales de las enseñanzas de Lama Tsong Khapa

    Vortrag· ES· 80 min

    FPMT EspañolOffizieller Kanal

  • La Vida de Lama Tsongkhapa - Dr. Alexander Berzin

    Aufnahme Dritter· ES· 22 min

    Narraciones Budismo

Galerie

Galerie

Bilder mit geprüfter Lizenz. Jedes bewahrt seine Urheberschaft und seinen Herkunftsnachweis.

Handschriften

Handschriften

Handschriftliche Zeugen und alte Texte, mit ihrer verwahrenden Einrichtung und ihren Einsichtsbedingungen.

  • BO · Tibetano (dbu can) · 1388–1419

    རྗེ་ཙོང་ཁ་པའི་གསུང་འབུམ། (gsung 'bum, bkras lhun par rnying)

    Erhaltener Textzeuge
    Xilografía de las planchas antiguas de Tashi Lhunpo, 18 vols.; reimpresión fotográfica de Dharamsala (Sherig Parkhang), 1997
    Verwahrende Einrichtung
    Buddhist Digital Resource Center (BDRC), copia digital · bdr:MW29193 (índice bdr:O2DB2379)
    Digitalisierung
    library.bdrc.io/show/bdr:MW29193…
Handschriften →

Beziehungen

Beziehungen

Einflüsse, Schülerschaften und Verwandtschaften. Die belegte Beziehung wird von der durch Analyse ermittelten Ähnlichkeit unterschieden.

  • Beeinflusst von

    Candrakīrti

    His principal authority in Madhyamaka; Illuminating the Intent comments on his Entering the Middle Way.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Beeinflusst von

    Nāgārjuna

    His philosophy is a reading of Nāgārjuna; the Ocean of Reasoning comments chapter by chapter on the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, and he also annotated the Sixty Stanzas of Reasoning.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Beeinflusst von

    Śāntideva

    He taught and annotated the wisdom chapter of the Bodhicaryāvatāra and the Śikṣāsamuccaya (vols. 14 and 16 of his works); Śāntideva is one of the sources of the great-scope lamrim.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Beeinflusst von

    Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha

    The Praise of Dependent Origination addresses the Buddha as unsurpassed teacher for teaching dependent origination; the Essence of Eloquence is a hermeneutics of his words.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Beeinflusst von

    Milarepa

    A lineage relationship, not a personal one: the six yogas of Nāropa that Tsongkhapa expounded in the Book of Three Inspirations are the cycle Marpa transmitted to Milarepa, which he received at Kagyu centres such as Drikung.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Beeinflusste

    The 14th Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso)

    The 14th Dalai Lama, spiritual head of the Geluk lineage descending from Tsongkhapa through his disciple Gendun Drub (1st Dalai Lama), has taught and commented on the Lamrim Chenmo (From Here to Enlightenment, 2012), the Three Principal Aspects and the Great Exposition of Secret Mantra.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Widersprach

    Bodhidharma

    An indirect, not historical, relationship: the Lamrim Chenmo criticises the concept-free meditation that Tibetan tradition attributed to the Chan master Heshang Moheyan (Samye debate, eighth century), heir of the school that claimed descent from Bodhidharma. Tsongkhapa does not mention Bodhidharma.

    Durch Analyse ermittelte Ähnlichkeit

  • Schüler von

    Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö (1349–1412)

    His principal teacher of Madhyamaka and Abhidharma; he dedicated praises, letters and an instruction to him (vols. 2, 12 and 14).

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Beeinflusst von

    Atiśa Dīpaṃkara Śrījñāna

    The Lamrim Chenmo develops Atiśa's Lamp for the Path to Enlightenment and the Kadam tradition.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Lehrer von

    Gyaltsab Darma Rinchen (1364–1432)

    Chief disciple and first holder of the Ganden throne; he recorded several of his teachings in writing.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Lehrer von

    Khedrup Gelek Pelzang (1385–1438)

    Disciple and author of his principal biographies; retrospectively, the first Panchen Lama.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Lehrer von

    Gendun Drub (1391–1474)

    Disciple, founder of Tashi Lhunpo and posthumously recognised as the first Dalai Lama.

    Belegte Beziehung

  • Stand im Briefwechsel mit

    Emperador Yongle (dinastía Ming)

    He invited him to court in 1407 and 1413; Tsongkhapa declined by letter.

    Belegte Beziehung

Von anderen Einträgen aus verknüpft

Quellen

Quellen

Für diesen Eintrag herangezogene Bibliografie und Kataloge.

  1. Wikidata, «Tsongkhapa», QID Q323439 (VIAF 65296968; LCCN n80017690; BDRC bdr:P64; Treasury of Lives 8986).
  2. Jinpa, Thupten. Tsongkhapa: A Buddha in the Land of Snows. Boulder: Shambhala Publications, 2019. ISBN 9781611806465.
  3. Sparham, Gareth, y Chandra Chiara Ehm. «Tsongkhapa». En Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Primera publicación 18 de julio de 2011; revisión sustancial 17 de abril de 2024.
  4. Buddhist Digital Resource Center (BDRC). gsung 'bum/ tsong kha pa (bkras lhun par rnying / d+ha sar bskyar par brgyab pa), reimpresión de las planchas antiguas de Tashi Lhunpo, Dharamsala, 1997, 18 vols., instancia bdr:MW29193, índice bdr:O2DB2379 (contenido volumen por volumen).
  5. Thurman, Robert A. F. (ed.). The Life and Teachings of Tsong Khapa. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1982; nueva ed. 2006, ISBN 9788186470442. Incluye la traducción de la biografía tradicional y de varias obras breves.
  6. Tsong-kha-pa. The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Trad. Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee; ed. Joshua W. C. Cutler y Guy Newland. 3 vols. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 2000–2004. ISBN 9781559391528, 9781559391689, 9781559391665.
  7. Tsongkhapa. Ocean of Reasoning: A Great Commentary on Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Trad. Geshe Ngawang Samten y Jay L. Garfield. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 9780195147339.
  8. Thurman, Robert A. F. Tsong Khapa's Speech of Gold in the Essence of True Eloquence: Reason and Enlightenment in the Central Philosophy of Tibet. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. ISBN 9780691072852 (reed. como The Central Philosophy of Tibet, 1991, ISBN 9780691020679).
  9. Jinpa, Thupten. Self, Reality and Reason in Tibetan Philosophy: Tsongkhapa's Quest for the Middle Way. Londres: RoutledgeCurzon, 2002.
  10. Ary, Elijah S. Authorized Lives: Biography and the Early Formation of Geluk Identity. Somerville (MA): Wisdom Publications, 2015.
  11. Laird, Thomas. The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama. Nueva York: Grove Press, 2006.
  12. Wikipedia (en). «Je Tsongkhapa», «Ganden Monastery» y «Monlam Prayer Festival». Usadas como índice de traducciones y bibliografía secundaria; contrastadas con t2, t3 y t4.
  13. Wikimedia Commons, API imageinfo (licencia, autor, fecha y descripción de cada fichero citado en images[]).
  14. Open Library (Internet Archive). Registros de ISBN de cada edición citada en works[].
  15. Huc, Évariste-Régis. Souvenirs d'un voyage dans la Tartarie, le Thibet et la Chine pendant les années 1844, 1845 et 1846. 2 vols. París: Adrien Le Clere, 1850 (descripción de Kumbum y del «árbol de las diez mil imágenes»).
  16. Ium, Michael. «Tsongkhapa as a mahāsiddha». Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 45 (2022): 73–117. doi:10.2143/JIABS.45.0.3291577.
  17. Kilty, Gavin (trad.). The Splendor of an Autumn Moon: The Devotional Verse of Tsongkhapa. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2001. ISBN 9780861711925.
  18. Mullin, Glenn H. Tsongkhapa's Six Yogas of Naropa. Ithaca (NY): Snow Lion, 1996. ISBN 9781559390583.
  19. Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso). From Here to Enlightenment: An Introduction to Tsong-kha-pa's Classic Text The Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path to Enlightenment. Ed. y trad. Guy Newland. Boston: Snow Lion, 2012. Trad. esp.: De aquí a la iluminación, Madrid: Gaia Ediciones, 2014, ISBN 9788484454854.
  20. YouTube: conferencias y documentales verificados por oEmbed el 2026-10-25 (detalle en videos[]).
  21. Lotsawa House. «Three Principal Aspects of the Path» (lam gyi gtso bo rnam gsum), texto tibetano con colofón; y presentación de «Prayer to Rendawa Zhönnu Lodrö».
Rechteinhaber
Obra original en dominio público (m. 1419). Las traducciones modernas tienen derechos propios: Shambhala Publications/Snow Lion (Lamrim Chenmo; Gran exposición del mantra secreto; Seis yogas), Wisdom Publications (Iluminación del pensamiento, Lamrim medio, Lámpara de las cinco etapas, ética tántrica), Oxford University Press (Océano de razonamiento), Princeton University Press (Esencia de la elocuencia), SUNY Press, Ediciones Dharma (versión española del Lamrim Chenmo), Gaia Ediciones.

Bestätigung ausstehend

Was dieser Eintrag noch nicht klären konnte. Wir sagen es lieber, als es aufzufüllen.

  • Sala de lectura: no se ha encontrado ningún texto de Tsongkhapa en dominio público con texto completo en Gutenberg, Wikisource (inglés, chino, multilingüe) ni Internet Archive con OCR limpio. Todas las traducciones occidentales son posteriores a 1970 y la china de Fazun (m. 1980) tiene derechos en la UE y en España. El texto tibetano original (libre en todas partes) solo está en BDRC, que el importador no lee. Revisar si BDRC o el ACIP ofrecen e-textos importables.
  • Ediciones españolas: solo se han verificado en catálogo las de Ediciones Dharma (Lamrim Chenmo, 2000, 2007, 2011; el catálogo no indica qué volumen es cada una) y el comentario del Dalái Lama (Gaia, 2014). No se ha localizado con ISBN una edición española de Los tres aspectos principales, la Alabanza del origen dependiente ni de la Gran exposición del mantra secreto.
  • Las obras secundarias de las obras completas (vols. 1–12, 14–18) se han registrado a partir del índice de BDRC; sus títulos se han traducido y descrito según el título y el género, sin lectura del texto. Algunas identificaciones quedan por confirmar: 01.09 (zhu lan sman mchog), 07.6 («Los cuatrocientos cincuenta»), 11.07 (a tsa la gar b+ha), 14.4 (relación con el Lamrim medio) y 02.3.056 (identificación con Yon tan gzhir gyur ma).
  • Los textos del vol. 1 que son biografías de Tsongkhapa escritas por discípulos (01.01–01.04, entre ellas las de Khedrup) y el colofón de impresión del vol. 13 no se registran como obras suyas; se mencionan en la entrada «gsung-bum».
  • Fechas: ordenación completa (c. 1381) y novicio (c. 1363) proceden de la tradición biográfica resumida en Jinpa 2019; no se ha podido leer el libro directamente. Treasury of Lives (8986) devuelve 403 a clientes automáticos.
  • Citas: el texto tibetano de Los tres aspectos principales se ha cotejado con Lotsawa House; las traducciones al español e inglés son del investigador. La primera estrofa de la Alabanza del origen dependiente se da de memoria y está marcada como «probable»: cotejar con una edición.
  • Relación con Padmasambhava: no se ha documentado ninguna relación directa entre ambos (separados por seis siglos y escuelas distintas); no se registra.
  • Duraciones de vídeo tomadas de la página de resultados de YouTube; el año de publicación no se ha registrado (la API oEmbed no lo devuelve).

Recherchiert am 2026-10-25